Skip to main content
NCBI home page
International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research logoLink to International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
. 2006 Mar 24;14(4):203–212. doi: 10.1002/mpr.8

The development and initial validation of the Terminally Ill Grief or Depression Scale (TIGDS)

Vyjeyanthi S Periyakoil 1,2,✉, Helena C Kraemer 3, Art Noda 3, Rudolf Moos 1,3, James Hallenbeck 1,2, Maria Webster 1, Jerome A Yesavage 1,3
PMCID: PMC6878415  PMID: 16395873

Abstract

Patients often experience ‘preparatory‐grief’ as they cope with the dying process. Some may be depressed. The Terminally Ill Grief or Depression Scale (TIGDS), comprising grief and depression sub‐scales, is a new self‐report measure designed to differentiate between preparatory‐grief and depression in adult inpatients.

The initial 100‐item inventory was assembled based on literature review, interviews with clinicians and dying patients and then shortened to 42 items based on consensus expert opinion. Validity and reliability were tested in a sample of 55 terminally ill adults. The consensus clinical opinion was used as the gold standard to differentiate between preparatory grief and depression. The intra‐class correlation coefficient was high (it was calculated to estimate the test‐retest reliability for the 47 patients who had completed the TIGDS twice – retest was administered 2 to 7 days after the initial test), ranging from 0.86 (grief) to 0.97 (depression). The validity of TIGDS was assessed using a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, comparing the first test with the clinical criterion. The first and only variable and cut‐point was the depression score (chi‐square = 18.4,p < 0.001, cut point = 3). The sensitivity of the TIGDS was 0.727 and specificity was 0.886 for the depression = 3 cutoff score. The construct validity of the TIGDS was tested by comparing with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The TIGDS depression subscale showed strong convergent validity and the TIGDS grief subscale showed strong discriminant validity with the HADS total score. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords: grief, depression, psychometrics, palliative

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (192.4 KB).

References

  1. Andrews B, Qian M, Valentine JD. Predicting depressive symptoms with a new measure of shame. The Experience of Shame Scale. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 2002; 41(1):29–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Block SD. For the ACP‐ASIM End‐of‐Life Care Consensus Panel. Assessing and managing depression in the terminally ill patient. Annals Intern Med 2000; 132: 209–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bonanno G, Kaltman S. Toward an integrative perspective on bereavement. Psych Bull 1999; 125: 760–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bowlby J, Parkes CM. Separation and loss within the family In Anthony EJ. (ed.) The Child in his Family. New York: Wiley; pp. 197–216. [Google Scholar]
  5. Callahan J. The ethics of assisted suicide. Health and Social Work 1994; 19: 237–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chochinov HM, Wilson KG, Enns M, Lander S. Hopelessness and suicidal ideation in the terminally ill. Psychosomatics 1998; 39(4): 366–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cook A, Oltjenbruns K. Dying and Grieving: Lifespan and Family Perspectives. Fort Worth TX: Harcourt Brace, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  8. Efron B. The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans. Philadelphia PA: SIAM Press, 1982. [Google Scholar]
  9. Fleiss JL. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1981. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ghatavi K, Nicolson R, MacDonald C, Osher S, Levitt A. Defining guilt in depression: a comparison of subjects with major depression, chronic medical illness and healthy controls. J Affect Disord 2002; 68(2–3): 307–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Goodkin K, Baldewicz TT, Blaney NT, Asthana D, Kumar M, Shapshak P, et al. Physiological effects of bereavement and bereavement support group interventions In Stroebe MS, Hansson RO, Stroebe W, Schut H. (eds) Handbook of Bereavement Research. Washington DC: American Psychological Association, 2001, pp. 671–703. [Google Scholar]
  12. Hamilton M. A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1960; 23: 56–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hamlin M, Hammersley D. Benzodiazepines following bereavement. Paper presented at the International Conference on Grief and Bereavement in Contemporary Society, London, July 12–15, 1988.
  14. Higgins ES. A review of unrecognized mental illness in primary care. Prevalence, natural history, and efforts to change the course. Arch Fam Med 1994; 3: 908–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hollister L. Psychotherapeutic drugs in the dying and bereaved. J Thanatol 1972; 2: 623–9. [Google Scholar]
  16. Hotopf M, Chidgey J, Addington‐Hall J, Ly KL. Depression in advanced disease: a systematic review – Part I. Prevalence and case finding. Palliat Med 2002; 16(2): 81–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kessler RC, McGonagle KA, Zhao S, Nelson CB, Hughes M, Eshleman S, et al. Lifetime and 12 month prevalence of DSM III‐R psychiatric disorders in the United States: Results from the National Comorbidity Survey. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1994; 51(1): 8–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Klein DF, Blank HR. Psychopharmacological treatment of bereavement and its complications In Kutscher AH, Thomas CC. (eds). Death and Bereavement. Springfield IL, 1969, pp. 299–305. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kraemer HC. Evaluating Medical Tests: Objective and Quantitative Guidelines. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1992, pp. 76–85. [Google Scholar]
  20. Kraemer HC, Periyakoil VS, Noda A. Tutorial in bio‐statistics: Kappa coefficients in medical research. Stat Med 2002; 21: 2109–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kubler‐Ross E. On Death and Dying. New York: Simon Schuster, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  22. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159–74. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lloyd‐Williams, M . Criterion validation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale as a screening tool for depression in patients with advanced metastatic cancer, J Pain and Symptom Management 2000; 20(4): 259–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lloyd‐Williams, M . An analysis of the validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale as a screening tool in patients with advanced metastatic cancer, J Pain and Symptom Management 2001; 22(6): 990–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Maguire P. The use of antidepressants in patients with advanced cancer. Supp Care Cancer 2000; 8: 265–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Martin A, Jackson K. Depression in palliative care patients. Hospice J 2000; 7: 71–89. [Google Scholar]
  27. McDaniel JS, Musselman DL, Porter MR, Reed DA, Nemeroff CB. Depression in patients with cancer Diagnosis, biology and treatment. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1995; 52(2): 89–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. McNair BG, Highet NJ, Hickie IB, Davenport, TA Exploring the perspectives of people whose lives have been affected by depression. Med J Australia 2002; 176(Suppl): S69–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Minagawa H, Uchitomi Y, Yamawaki S, Ishitani K, Psychiatric morbidity in terminally ill cancer patients. A prospective study. Psycho‐oncology 1997; 7: 112–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Noda AM, Kraemer HC, Yesavage JA. How many raters are needed for a reliable diagnosis? International Journal of Methods in Psychiatry Research 2001; 10: 119–25. [Google Scholar]
  31. Nutt D. Management of patients with depression associated with anxiety symptoms. J Clin Psychiat 1997; 58(Suppl 8): 11–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Osterweis M, Solomon F, Green M. (eds) Bereavement: Reactions, Consequences and Care. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 1984. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Periyakoil VS, Hallenbeck JL. Identification and managing preparatory grief and depression at the end of life. Am Fam Physician 2002; 65(5): 883–90. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Plumb M, Holland J. Comparative studies of psychological function in patients with advanced cancer – 1. Self reported depressive symptoms. Psychosom Med 1997; 39: 254–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Radloff LS. The CES‐D scale: a self report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Measurement 1977; 1: 385–401. [Google Scholar]
  36. Sirey JA, Bruce ML, Alexopoulos GS, Perlick DA, Friedman SJ, Meyers BS. Stigma as a barrier to recovery: perceived stigma and patient‐rated severity of illness as predictors of antidepressant drug adherence. Psychiatr Serv 2001; 52(12):1615–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Sheehan B, Banerjee S. Review: somatization in the elderly. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 1999; 14(12):1044–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Strobe MS, Schut H. Models of coping and bereavement – a review In Stroebe MS, Hansson RO, Stroebe W, Schut H. (eds) Handbook of Bereavement Research. Washington DC: American Psychological Association, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  39. Tyrer P. The place of tranquilisers in the management of stress. J Psychosom Res 1983; 27: 385–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Von Korff M, Katon W, Unutzer J, Wells K, Wagner EH. Improving depression care: barriers, solutions, and research needs. J Fam Pract 2001; 50(6): E1. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Worden W. Grief Counseling and Grief Therapy: Handbook for the Mental Health Practitioner. NewYork: Springer, 1982/1991. [Google Scholar]
  42. Yesavage JA, Brink TL, Rose TL, Lum O, Huang V, Adey M, et al. Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. Psychiatr Res 1983; 17(1): 37–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES