Skip to main content
PMC home page
International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research logoLink to International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
. 2006 Mar 24;12(3):139–150. doi: 10.1002/mpr.150

A modelling strategy for the analysis of clinical trials with partly missing longitudinal data

Ian R White 1,✉, Erica Moodie 2, Simon G Thompson 1, Tim Croudace 3
PMCID: PMC6878453  PMID: 12953141

Abstract

Standard statistical analyses of randomized controlled trials with partially missing outcome data often exclude valuable information from individuals with incomplete follow‐up. This may lead to biased estimates of the intervention effect and loss of precision. We consider a randomized trial with a repeatedly measured outcome, in which the value of the outcome on the final occasion is of primary interest. We propose a modelling strategy in which the model is successively extended to include baseline values of the outcome, then intermediate values of the outcome, and finally values of other outcome variables. Likelihood‐based estimation of random effects models is used, allowing the incorporation of data from individuals with some missing outcomes. Each estimated intervention effect is free of non‐response bias under a different missing‐at‐random assumption. These assumptions become more plausible as the more complex models are fitted, so we propose using the trend in estimated intervention effects to assess the nature of any non‐response bias. The methods are applied to data from a trial comparing intensive case management with standard case management for severely psychotic patients. All models give similar estimates of the intervention effect and we conclude that non‐response bias is likely to be small. Copyright © 2003 Whurr Publishers Ltd.

Keywords: random effects modelling, multilevel modelling, incomplete data, missing values, MAR, longitudinal data, clinical trials

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (24.9 MB).

References

  1. Anderson TW. Maximum likelihood estimates for a multivariate normal distribution when some observations are missing. J Am Stat Assoc 1957; 52: 200–3. [Google Scholar]
  2. Arbuckle JL. Full information estimation in the presence of incomplete data In Marcoulides GA, Schumacker RE. (eds) Advanced Structural Equation Modeling: Issues and Techniques. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishing, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  3. Asberg M, Montgomery S, Perris C, Schalling D, Sedvall G. A comprehensive psychopathological rating scale. Acta Psych Scand (Supplement) 1978; 271: 5–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Burns T, Creed F, Fahy T, Thompson S, Tyrer P, White I. Intensive versus standard case management for severe psychotic illness: a randomised trial. Lancet 1999; 353: 2185–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cook N. Restricted Maximum Likelihood In Armitage P, Colton T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Biostatistics. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  6. Everitt BS. Analysis of longitudinal data: Beyond MANOVA. Br J Psych 1998;172: 7–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Frison L, Pocock SJ. Linearly divergent treatment effects in clinical trials with repeated measures: efficient analysis using summary statistics. Stat Med 1997;16: 2855–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gibbons RD, Hedeker D, Elkin I, Waternaux C, Kraemer HC, Greenhouse JB, Shea T, Imber SD, Sotsky SM, Watkins JT. Some conceptual and statistical issues in analysis of longitudinal psychiatric data. Arch Gen Psych 1993; 50: 739–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Goldstein H. Multilevel Statistical Models, 2 edn. London: Edward Arnold, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  10. Greenland S, Finkle W. A critical look at methods for handling missing covariates in epidemiologic regression analyses. Am J Epidemiol 1995; 142:1255–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hedeker D, Gibbons RD. MIXREG: a computer program for mixed‐effects regression analysis with autocorrelated errors. Comput Meth Programs Biomed 1996; 49: 229–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hollis S, Campbell F. What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trials. Br Med J 1999; 319: 670–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Laird NM, Ware JH. Random‐effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics 1982; 38: 963–74. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD. SAS system for mixed models. SAS institute: Cary, NC, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  15. Little R, Rubin D. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  16. Molenberghs G, Goetghebeur EJT, Lipsitz SR, Kenward MG, Lesaffre E, Michiels B. Missing data perspectives of the fluvoxamine data set: a review. Stat Med 1999; 18: 2449–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Molenberghs G, Kenward MG, Goetghebeur E. Sensitivity analysis for incomplete contingency tables: the Slovenian plebiscite case. Applied Statistics 2001; 50: 15–29. [Google Scholar]
  18. Murray GD, Findlay JG. Correcting for the bias caused by drop‐outs in hypertension trials. Stat Med 1988; 7: 941–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus User's Guide. Los Angeles CA: Muthén & Muthén, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  20. Rasbash J, Browne W, Goldstein H. A User's Guide to MLwiN. London: Institute of Education, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  21. Robins JM, Gill RD. Non‐response models for the analysis of non‐monotone ignorable missing data. Stat Med 1997; 16: 39–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Rubin DB. Multiple imputation after 18+ years. J Am Stat Assoc 1996; 91: 473–89. [Google Scholar]
  23. Schafer J. Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data. London: Chapman & Hall, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  24. Shadish WR, Hu X, Glaser RR, Kownacki RJ, Wong T. A method for exploring the effects of attrition in randomized experiments with dichotomous outcomes. Psychol Methods 1998; 3: 3–22. [Google Scholar]
  25. Stat Corp . Intercooled STATA 7.0 for Windows. College Station, Texas: Stata Corporation, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  26. Tyrer P, Remington M. Controlled comparison of day‐hospital and outpatient treatment for neurotic disorders. Lancet 1979; (i): 1014–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Verbeke G, Molenberghs G. (eds). Linear Mixed Models in Practice. New York: Springer‐Verlag, 1997. [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES