Skip to main content
PMC home page
International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research logoLink to International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
. 2006 Dec 11;16(1):11–22. doi: 10.1002/mpr.197

Structure analysis of Antonovsky's sense of coherence from an epidemiological mental health survey with a brief nine‐item sense of coherence scale

Olav Martin Klepp 1,5,✉, Arne Mastekaasa 2, Tom Sørensen 1, Inger Sandanger 3, Robert Kleiner 1,4
PMCID: PMC6878461  PMID: 17425244

Abstract

Antonovsky has proposed the sense of coherence (SOC) as a crucial factor that protects against symptoms of mental disease. A central issue in research on the SOC construct is whether this is most appropriately considered as one‐dimensional or three‐dimensional with comprehensibility (C), manageability (Ma) and meaningfulness (Me) as separate dimensions. In this paper we address this issue by means of confirmatory factor analysis of a shortened nine‐item version of Antonovsky's original 29‐ and 13‐items Sense of Coherence Scale (SOCS‐29), using epidemiological data from a mental health survey of adults in local communities (N = 1,062). In addition to analysing the internal structure of the SOC items, we examine the association between estimated factor scores and variables expected to be statistically related to SOC. Goodness‐of‐fit indices were very good for the three‐factor model but acceptable even for the one‐factor model. In the three‐factor model, however, the factors were found to be very highly or, with regard to Ma and C, even perfectly correlated. Moreover, the factor scores had very similar correlations with measures of psychological wellbeing, depression and anxiety and they are also very similarly related to age (and none of them are related to gender). We therefore conclude in favour of a one‐factor model. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords: sense of coherence, Sense of Coherence Scale, mental health promotion, confirmatory factor analysis, dimensionality

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (217.0 KB).

REFERENCES

  1. Andrews FM, Withey SB. Social Indicators of Wellbeing: America's Perception of Life Quality. New York: Plenum, 1976. [Google Scholar]
  2. Antonovsky A. Health, Stress, and Coping: New Perspectives on Mental and Physical Wellbeing. San Francisco: Jossey‐Bass Publishers, 1979. [Google Scholar]
  3. Antonovsky A. The sense of coherence. An historical and future perspective. Isr J Med Sci 1996; 32: 170–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Antonovsky A. The structure and properties of the Sense of Coherence Scale. Soc Sci Med 1993; 36(6): 725–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Antonovsky A. Unravelling the Mystery of Health: How People Manage Stress and Stay Well. San Francisco: Jossey‐Bass Publishers, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  6. Antonovsky A, Sagy S. The development of a sense of coherence scale and its impact on responses to stress situations. J Soc Psy 1986; 126: 213–25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bandura A. Self‐efficacy in human agency. Am Psychol 1982; 37: 122–147. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bandura A. Self‐efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 1977; 84: 191–215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bradburn NM. The Structure of Psychological Wellbeing. Chicago: Aldine, 1969. [Google Scholar]
  10. Campell A, Converse PE, Rodgers WL. The Quality of American Life. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1976. [Google Scholar]
  11. Cantril H. The Pattern of Human Concerns. New York: Rutgers University Press, 1965. [Google Scholar]
  12. Cederblad M. Fifty years of epidemiologic studies in child and adolescent psychiatry in Sweden. Nord J Psychiatry 1996; 244: 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  13. Compton WC, Smith ML, Cornish KA, Qualls DL. Factor structure of mental health measures. J Pers Soc Psychol 1996; 71: 406–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Derogatis LR. SCL‐90R: Administrative, Scoring and Procedure Manual I for the R Version. Baltimore: John Hopkins University School of Medicine, Psychometrics Research Unit, 1977. [Google Scholar]
  15. Derogatis LR, Lipman RS, Rickels K, Uhlenhuth EH, Covi L. The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL): a self‐report symptom inventory. Behav Sci 1974; 19: 1–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Dudek B, Makowska Z. Psychometric characteristics of the Orientation to Life Questionnaire for measuring the sense of coherence. Polish Psych Bull 1993; 24: 309–18. [Google Scholar]
  17. Feldt T, Rasku A. The structure of Antonovsky's Orientation to Life Questionnaire. Pers Indiv Dif 1998; 25: 505–16. [Google Scholar]
  18. Flannery RB, Flannery GJ. Sense of coherence, life stress, and psychological distress: a prospective methodological inquiry. J Clin Psychol 1990; 46: 415–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Foa UG. New developments in facet design and analysis. Psychol Rev 1965; 72: 262–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Freire P. Education for Critical Consciousness. New York: Seabury Press, 1973. [Google Scholar]
  21. Frenz AW, Carey MP, Jörgensen RS. Psychometric evaluation of Antonovsky's Sense of Coherence Scale. Psychol Assess 1993; 5: 145–53. [Google Scholar]
  22. Friborg O, Hjemdal O, Rosenvinge JH, Martinussen M. A new rating scale for adult resilience: what are the central protective resources behind healthy adjustment? IJMPR 2003; 12: 65–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Gana K, Garnier S. Latent structure of the sense of coherence scale in a French sample. Pers Individ Dif 2001; 31: 1079–90. [Google Scholar]
  24. Garmezy N. Children in poverty: resilience despite risk. Psychiatry 1993; 56: 127–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Garmezy N. Children under stress: perspectives on antecedents and correlates of vulnerability and resistance to pathology In Rabin AL, Arnoff J, Barclay AM, Zuckers RA. (eds) Further Explorations in Personality. New York: Wiley, 1981, pp. 196–296. [Google Scholar]
  26. Johansson I, Larsson G, Hamrin E. Sense of coherence, quality of life, a function among elderly hip fracture. Aging (Milano) 1998; 10: 377–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D. LISREL 8 User's Reference Guide. Chicago: Scientific Software, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  28. Kline, RB. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 2 edn. New York: Guilford, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kobasa SC. Stressful life events, personality and health: an inquiry in hardiness. J Pers Soc Psychol 1979; 34: 839–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Languis A, Björvell H, Antonovsky A. The sense of coherence concept and its relation to personality traits in Swedish samples. Scand J Caring Sci 1992; 6: 165–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Larsson G, Kallenberg K. Dimensional analysis of sense of coherence using structural equation modelling. Eur J Pers 1999; 13: 51–61. [Google Scholar]
  32. Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York: Springer, 1984. [Google Scholar]
  33. Lindström B. The meaning of resilience. Int J Adolesc Med Health 2001; 13(1): 7–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Lundquist T. Chronic cannabis use and the sense of coherence. Life Sci 1995; 56: 2145–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Poppius E, Tenkanen L, Kalimo R, Heinsalmi P. The sense of coherence, occupation, and the risk of coronary heart disease in the Helsinki Heart Study. Soc Sci Med 1999; 49: 109–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Rotter JB. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs 1966; 80: 1–28. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Rotter JB. Some problems and misconceptions related to the construct of internal versus external control of reinforcement. J Consult Clin Psychol 1975; 43: 149–55. [Google Scholar]
  38. Rutter M. Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms In Rolf JE, Masten AS. (eds) Risk and Protective Factors in the Development of Psychopathology. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990: 181–214. [Google Scholar]
  39. Rutter M. Resilience in the face of adversity. Br J of Psychiatry 1985; 147: 598–611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Sandanger I. Occurrence of Psychiatric Disorders‐ An Epidemiological Study, Conceptual, Methodological, and Empirical issues. Oslo: Institute of General Practice and Community Medicine, and Institute Group of Psychiatry, University of Oslo, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  41. Sandell R, Blomberg J, Lazar A. The factor structure of Antonovsky's sense of coherence scale in Swedish clinical and nonclinical samples. Pers Individ Dif 1998; 5: 701–11. [Google Scholar]
  42. Scheier MF, Carver CS. Dispositional optimism and physical wellbeing: the influence of generalized outcome expectancies on health. J Pers 1987; 55: 169–210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Scheier MF, Carver CS. Optimism, coping, and health: assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies. Health Psychol 1985: 219–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Schumacher J, Wilz G, Gunzelmann T, Brähler E. Die sense of coherence scale von Antonovsky. Psychoter Psychosom Med Psychol 2000; 50: 472–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Sørensen T, Næss S. To measure quality of life. Relevance and use in the psychiatric domain. Nord J Psychiatry 1996; 50: Suppl 37: 29–39. [Google Scholar]
  46. Wallston BS, Wallston KA. Locus of control and health: a review of the literature. Health Educ Monog 1978; 6: 107–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Werner EE. High‐risk children in young adulthood: a longitudinal study from birth to 32 years. Am J Orthopsychiatry 1989; 59: 72–81. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Werner EE. Journeys from Childhood to Midlife: Risk, Resilience and Recovery. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press, 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Werner EE. Risk, resilience and recovery: perspectives from the Kauai longitudinal study. Dev Psychopathol 1993; 5: 503–15. [Google Scholar]
  50. WHO. Ottawa Charter 1986 . An international conference on health promotion. Health Promot 1986; 1: iii–462. [Google Scholar]
  51. Winokur A, Winokur DF, Rickels K, Cox DC. Symptoms of emotional distress in a family planning service: stability over a four‐week period. Br J Psychiatry 1984; 144: 395–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES