Skip to main content
NCBI home page
International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research logoLink to International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
. 2006 Jan 6;14(1):29–42. doi: 10.1002/mpr.15

Resilience in relation to personality and intelligence

Oddgeir Friborg 1,✉, Dag Barlaug 2, Monica Martinussen 1,2, Jan H Rosenvinge 1, Odin Hjemdal 3
PMCID: PMC6878482  PMID: 16097398

Abstract

Resilience is a construct of increasing interest, but validated scales measuring resilience factors among adults are scarce. Here, a scale named the Resilience Scale for Adults (RSA) was crossvalidated and compared with measures of personality (Big Five/5PFs), cognitive abilities (Raven's Advanced Matrices, Vocabulary, Number series), and social intelligence (TSIS). All measures were given to 482 applicants for the military college.

Confirmatory factor analyses confirmed the fit of the five‐factor model, measuring ‘personal strength’, ‘social competence’, ‘structured style’, ‘family cohesion’ and ‘social resources’. Using Big Five to discriminate between well adjusted and more vulnerable personality profiles, all resilience factors were positively correlated with the well adjusted personality profile. RSA‐personal strength was most associated with 5PFs‐emotional stability, RSA‐social competence with 5PFs‐extroversion and 5PFs‐agreeableness, as well as TSIS‐social skills, RSA‐structured style with 5PFs‐conscientiousness. Unexpectedly but interestingly, measures of RSA‐family cohesion and RSA‐social resources were also related to personality. Furthermore, the RSA was unrelated to cognitive abilities.

This study supported the convergent and discriminative validity of the scale, and thus the inference that individuals scoring high on this scale are psychologically healthier, better adjusted, and thus more resilient. Copyright © 2005 Whurr Publishers Ltd.

Keywords: resilience, validation, personality, cognitive abilities, social intelligence

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (226.6 KB).

References

  1. Asendorpf JB, Borkenau P, Ostendorf F, van Aken MAG. Carving personality description at its joints: confirmation of three replicable personality prototypes for both children and adults. Eur J Pers 2001; 15: 169–98. [Google Scholar]
  2. Block J. A contrarian view of the five‐factor approach to personality description. Psychol Bull 1995; 117: 187–215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cederblad M, Dahlin L, Hagnell O, Hansson K. Intelligence and temperament as protective factors for mental health: A cross‐sectional and prospective epidemiological study. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 1995; 245: 11–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Clausen JA. American Lives: Looking Back at the Children of the Great Depression. New York: Free Press, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  5. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences. New York: Academic Press, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  6. Costa PT, McCrae RR. Domains and facets: hierarchical personality assessment using the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. J Pers Ass 1995; 64: 21–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cowen E, Work W. Resilient children, psychological wellness, and primary prevention. Am J Community Psychol 1988; 16: 591–607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cronbach LJ. Essentials of Psychological Testing. New York: HarperCollins, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  9. Davey M, Eaker DG, Walters LH. Resilience processes in adolescents: personality profiles, self‐worth, and coping. J Adolesc Res 2003; 18: 347–62. [Google Scholar]
  10. DiStefano C. The impact of categorization with confirmatory factor analysis. Struct Equation Model 2002; 9: 327–346. [Google Scholar]
  11. Egeland BR, Carlson E, Sroufe LA. Resilience as process. Dev Psychopathol 1993; 5: 517–28. [Google Scholar]
  12. Egeland BR, Sroufe LA, Erickson M. The developmental consequence of different patterns of maltreatment. Child Abuse Negl 1983; 7: 459–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Engvik H. ‘Big Five’ in Norwegian. J Norw Psychol Ass 1993; 30: 884–96. [Google Scholar]
  14. Engvik H. 5PFmil 2.0 [Computer software]. Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Norway, 1997.
  15. Engvik H, Hjerkinn O, Seim S. Handbook of Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. Jaren: Vigga trykk, 1978. [Google Scholar]
  16. Friborg O. A prospective study of resilience, vulnerability, negative life events and psychiatric symptomatology. Unpublished raw data, 2004.
  17. Friborg O, Hjemdal O, Rosenvinge JH, Martinussen M. A new rating scale for adult resilience: what are the central protective resources behind healthy adjustment? Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 2003; 12: 65–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Friborg O, Martinussen M, Rosenvinge J. Likert‐based versus semantic differential‐based scorings of positive psychological constructs: a psychometric comparison of two versions of a scale measuring resilience. Submitted for publication, 2004.
  19. Furnham A, Crump J, Whelan J. Validating the NEO personality inventory using assessor's ratings. Pers Individual Diff 1997; 22: 669–75. [Google Scholar]
  20. Garmezy N. Children under stress: perspectives on antecedents and correlates of vulnerability and resistance to pathology In Rabin AI, Arnoff J, Barclay AM, Zuckers RA. (eds) Further Explorations in Personality. New York: Wiley Interscience, 1981, pp. 196–269. [Google Scholar]
  21. Hjemdal O, Friborg O, Martinussen M, Rosenvinge JH. Preliminary results from the development and validation of a Norwegian scale for measuring adult resilience. J Norw Psychol Ass 2001; 38: 310–17. [Google Scholar]
  22. Hu L, Bentler PM. Evaluating model fit In Hoyle RH. (ed.) Structural Equation Modeling. Concepts, Issues, and Applications. Thousands Oaks CA: Sage, 1995, pp. 76–99. [Google Scholar]
  23. Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equation Model 1999; 6: 1–55. [Google Scholar]
  24. Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D. LISREL 8: Users' Reference Guide. Mooresville IN: Scientific Software Inc, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  25. Luthar SS. Vulnerability and resilience: A study of high‐risk adolescents. Child Dev 1991; 62: 600–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Luthar SS, D'Avanzo K, Hites S. Maternal drug abuse versus other psychological disturbances: Risks and resilience among children In Luthar SS. (ed.) Resilience and Vulnerability: Adaptation in the Context of Childhood Adversities. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003, pp. 104–29. [Google Scholar]
  27. Martinussen M, Torjussen T. Pilot selection in the Norwegian Air Force: a validation and meta‐analysis of the test battery. Int J Aviat Psychol 1997; 8: 33–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. McCrae RR. Controlling neuroticism in the measurement of stress (special issue: II–IV. Advances in measuring life stress). Stress Med 1990; 6: 237–41. [Google Scholar]
  29. McCrae RR, Costa PT. Personality trait structure as a human universal. Am Psychol 1997; 52: 509–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Murphy LB, Moriarty AE. Vulnerability, coping and growth. New Haven CT: Yale University Press, 1976. [Google Scholar]
  31. Nezlek JB. Daily psychological adjustment and the planfulness of day‐to‐day behavior. J Soc Clin Psychol 2001; 20: 452–75. [Google Scholar]
  32. Radke‐Yarrow M, Sherman T. Hard growing: children who survive In Rolf RE, Masten AS, Cicchetti D, Nuechterlein KH, Weintraub S. (eds) Risk and Protective Factors in the Development of Psychopathology. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990: 97–119. [Google Scholar]
  33. Rammstedt B, Riemann R, Angleitner A, Borkenau P. Resilients, overcontrollers, and undercontrollers: the replicability of the three personality prototypes across informants. Eur J Pers 2004; 18: 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  34. Raven JC. Advanced Progressive Matrices. Oxford: Psychologist Press, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  35. Raykov T. Estimation of congeneric scale reliability using covariance structure analysis with constraints. Br J Math Stat Psychol 2001; 54: 315–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Riggio RE. Assessment of basic social skills. J Pers Soc Psychol 1986; 51: 649–60. [Google Scholar]
  37. Riolli L, Savicki V, Cepani A. Resilience in the face of catastrophe: optimism, personality and coping in the Kosovo crisis. J Appl Soc Psychol 2002; 32: 1604–27. [Google Scholar]
  38. Ross RT. Behavioral correlates of levels of intelligence. Am J Ment Defic 1972; 76: 545–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Rutter M. Resilience in the face of adversity. Br J Psychiatry 1985; 147: 598–611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Silvera DH, Martinussen M, Dahl TI. The Tromsø Social Intelligence Scale, a self‐report measure of social intelligence. Scand J Psychol 2001; 42: 313–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Sternberg RJ. Applying the triarchic theory of human intelligence in the classroom In Sternberg RJ, Williams WM. (eds) Intelligence, Instruction, and Assessment: Theory into Practice. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 1998, pp. 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  42. Sullivan HS. Psychiatry: Introduction to the study of interpersonal relations. Psychiatry: J Stud Interpers Process 1938; 1: 121–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Vaillant GE, Davis, JT . Social/emotional intelligence and midlife resilience in schoolboys with low tested intelligence. Am J Orthopsychiatry 2000; 70: 215–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Werner EE. Risk, resilience, and recovery: Perspectives from the Kauai Longitudinal Study. Dev Psychopathol 1993; 5: 503–15. [Google Scholar]
  45. Werner EE. Journeys from childhood to midlife: risk, resilience, and recovery. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press, 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Werner EE, Smith RS. Overcoming the Odds. High Risk Children from Birth to Adulthood. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1992. [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES