Abstract
The validity of diagnostic psychiatric instruments for depression and anxiety disorders may be compromised among patients with complex physical illness and disability. The objective of this study was to determine the effect on the prevalence rate of depression and anxiety in a nursing home population of attributing somatic symptoms of depression and anxiety to either somatic or psychiatric disorder. Symptoms of major depression (MD), generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and panic disorder (PD) were measured using the Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN). Somatic symptoms of MD, GAD and PD were attributed to somatic causes when the interviewer was not sure about a psychiatric cause. To analyse the effect of this attribution on the prevalence rate of MD, GAD and PD, a sensitivity analysis was undertaken in which symptoms that were attributed to somatic causes were recoded as symptoms attributed to psychiatric disorder. Prevalence rates of MD, GAD and PD were calculated before and after recoding.
The prevalence of MD after recoding rose from 7.5% to 8.1%. The prevalence of GAD did not change. The prevalence of PD rose from 1.5% to 1.8%. Attribution of somatic symptoms to either somatic or psychiatric disorder when the interviewer was not sure about a psychiatric cause of the somatic symptoms had only a very modest effect on the prevalence rate of major depression, generalized anxiety disorder and panic disorder in a nursing home population. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Keywords: symptom attribution, prevalence, depression, anxiety, nursing home
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (88.5 KB).
References
- American Psychiatric Association : Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4 edn Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Fogel BS, Fretwell M. Reclassification of depression in the medically ill elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc 1985; 33: 446–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. Mini‐Mental State. a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975; 12: 189–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harper RG, Kotik‐Harper D, Kirby H. Psychometric assessment of depression in an elderly general medical population: over‐ or underassessment? J Nerv Ment Dis 1990; 178: 113–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heithoff K. Does the ECA underestimate the prevalence of late‐life depression? J Am Geriatr Soc 1995; 43: 2–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jongenelis K, Pot AM, Eisses AMH, Beekman ATF, Kluiter H, Ribbe MW. Prevalence and risk indicators of depression in elderly nursing home patients: the AGED Study. J Affect Disord 2004; 83: 135–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Knauper B, Wittchen H‐U. Diagnosing major depression in the elderly: evidence for response bias in standardized diagnostic interviews? J Psychiatr Res 1994; 28: 147–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Robins LN, Helzer JE, Croughan J, Ratcliff KS. National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule: history, characteristics, and validity. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1981; 38: 381–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Snowdon J. The prevalence of depression in old age: an editorial. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 1990; 5: 141–4. [Google Scholar]
- World Health Organization (WHO) : Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN). Geneva, WHO, 1999 Dutch edition (eds: Giel R, Nienhuis FJ.) SCAN 2.1 vragenschema's voor de klinische beoordeling in de neuropsychiatrie. Groningen: Swets & Zeitlinger, 1999. [Google Scholar]