Skip to main content
International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research logoLink to International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
. 2006 Mar 24;11(2):68–74. doi: 10.1002/mpr.124

Graphing survival curve estimates for time‐dependent covariates

Lonni R Schultz 1,, Edward L Peterson 1, Naomi Breslau 2
PMCID: PMC6878542  PMID: 12459796

Abstract

Graphical representation of statistical results is often used to assist readers in the interpretation of the findings. This is especially true for survival analysis where there is an interest in explaining the patterns of survival over time for specific covariates. For fixed categorical covariates, such as a group membership indicator, Kaplan‐Meier estimates (1958) can be used to display the curves. For time‐dependent covariates this method may not be adequate. Simon and Makuch (1984) proposed a technique that evaluates the covariate status of the individuals remaining at risk at each event time. The method takes into account the change in an individual's covariate status over time. The survival computations are the same as the Kaplan‐Meier method, in that the conditional survival estimates are the function of the ratio of the number of events to the number at risk at each event time. The difference between the two methods is that the individuals at risk within each level defined by the covariate is not fixed at time 0 in the Simon and Makuch method as it is with the Kaplan‐Meier method. Examples of how the two methods can differ for time dependent covariates in Cox proportional hazards regression analysis are presented. Copyright © 2002 Whurr Publishers Ltd.

Keywords: Kaplan‐Meier estimates, time dependent covariates, graphing procedures

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (80.5 MB).

References

  1. Anthony JC, Petronis KR. Early‐onset drug use and risk of later drug problems. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 1995; 40: 9–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Breslau N, Schultz L, Peterson E. Sex differences in depression: a role for pre‐existing anxiety. Psychiatry Research 1995; 58: 1–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Breslau N, Peterson EL, Schultz LR, Andreski P, Chilcoat H. Are smokers with alcohol disorders less likely to quit? American Journal of Public Health 1996; 86: 985–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Breslau N, Peterson EL, Schultz LR, Chilcoat H, Andreski P. Major depression and stages of smoking. Archives of General Psychiatry 1998; 55: 161–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Breslau N, Schultz LR, Stewart WF, Lipton RB, Lucia VC, Welch KMA. Headache and major depression: is the association specific to migraine? Neurology 2000; 54: 308–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Breslau N, Johnson EO, Hiripi E, Kessler R. Nicotine dependence in the United States: prevalence, trends and smoking persistence. Archives of General Psychiatry 2001; 58: 810–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chilcoat H, Breslau N. Investigations of causal pathways between PTSD and drug use disorders. Addictive Behaviors 1998; 23: 827–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. Journal of American Statistical Association 1958; 53: 457–81. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kessler RC, Sonnega A, Bromet E, Hughes M, Nelson CB. Posttraumatic stress disorder in the National Comorbidity Survey. Archives General Psychiatry 1995; 52: 1048–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Simon R, Makuch RW. A non‐parametric graphical representation of the relationship between survival and the occurrence of an event: application to responder versus non‐responder bias. Statistics in Medicine 1984; 3: 35–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. StataCorp 2001 . Stata Statistical Software: Release 7.0 College Station, TX: Stata Corporation.

Articles from International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES