Skip to main content
International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research logoLink to International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
. 2006 Mar 24;13(3):184–191. doi: 10.1002/mpr.174

The Homeless Supplement to the Diagnostic Interview Schedule: test‐retest analyses

Carol S North 1,, Karin M Eyrich 1,2, David E Pollio 2, Douglas A Foster 1, Linda B Cottler 1, Edward L Spitznagel 3
PMCID: PMC6878567  PMID: 15297902

Abstract

This study sought to extend previous work on reliability of self‐reported residential history in a homeless population with high rates of drug abuse. The latest version of the Homeless Supplement to the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS/HS) was used to achieve reliability on homelessness experience, use of shelters, transience, and recent residential patterns.

Homeless study volunteers were recruited for a test‐retest study from a drop‐in day centre for mentally ill homeless people (N = 25) and a substance abuse day programme (N = 30). They were administered the instrument approximately one to two days apart. Kappa and intraclass correlation analyses were performed to assess reliability.

Overall, the reliabilities of most variables were acceptable, ranging from fair to excellent. Six items were reconstructed to achieve reliability and two were dropped. Substance dependence and adult antisocial behaviour patterns did not affect reliability on most items.

This study has developed a reliable self report instrument for measuring residential history that can be used with homeless and drug abusing populations. Replication is needed in larger, more representative samples and comparison of reliability with other psychiatric and cognitive characteristics. Copyright © 2004 Whurr Publishers Ltd.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (143.4 KB).

References

  1. Calsyn RJ, Allen G, Morse GA, Smith R, Tempelhoff B. Can you trust self‐report data provided by homeless mental ill individuals? Eval Rev 1993; 17: 353–66. [Google Scholar]
  2. Calsyn RJ, Morse GA, Klinkenberg WD, Trusty ML. Reliability and validity of self‐report data of homeless mentally ill individuals. Eval Program Plan 1997; 20: 47–54. [Google Scholar]
  3. Conrad KJ, Yagelka JR, Matters MD, Rich AR, Williams V, Buchanan M. Reliability and validity of a modified Colorado Symptom Index in a national homeless sample. Ment Health Serv Res 2001; 3: 141–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cottler LB, Compton WM, Ridenour TA, Ben Abdallah A, Gallagher T. Reliability of self‐reported antisocial personality disorder symptoms aomng substance abusers. Drug Alc Dep 1998; 49: 189–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Drake RE, McHugo GJ, Biesanz JC. The test‐retest reliability of standardized instruments among homeless persons with substance use disorders. J Stud Alc 1995; 56: 161–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hser Y, Anglin MD, Chou C. Reliability of retrospective self‐report by narcotics addicts. Psychol Ass 1992; 4: 207–13. [Google Scholar]
  7. North CS, Eyrich KM, Pollio DE, Spitznagel EL. Are rates of psychiatric disorders in the homeless population changing? Am J Public Health 2004; 94: 103–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sacks JA, Drake RE, Williams VF, Banks SM, Herrell JM. Utility of the time‐line follow‐back to assess substance use among homeless adults. J Nerv Ment Dis 2003; 191: 145–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Smith EM, North CS, Spitznagel EL. A systematic study of mental illness, substance abuse, and treatment in 600 homeless men. Ann Clin Psychiat 1992; 4:111–20. [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES