Skip to main content
International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research logoLink to International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
. 2008 Jan 10;16(4):230–236. doi: 10.1002/mpr.226

The Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology: German translation and psychometric validation

T Drieling 1, LO Schärer 1, JM Langosch 1,
PMCID: PMC6878575  PMID: 18200596

Abstract

The Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS) is a rating scale for depression, widely used in international multicentre studies. There are two corresponding versions: a self‐rated (IDS‐SR) and a clinician‐rated (IDS‐C) scale. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the German versions of the IDS‐SR and IDS‐C in comparison to the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) and to the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). The sample consisted of 59 inpatients and outpatients treated for unipolar or bipolar disorders. Internal consistency of the IDS‐SR and IDS‐C was found highly acceptable (α = 0.94 and α = 0.93). Item‐total‐correlations of the IDS‐SR revealed that 68% of the items were strongly correlated with the sum score (0.50). This was in the same range with the IDS‐C (54%), the HRSD (53%) and the BDI (76%). Furthermore, there is a high concurrent validity (r ≥ 0.88) of the IDS‐SR with the IDS‐C, the BDI and the HRSD. Substantial score‐differences between inpatients and outpatients indicate a good discriminant validity. It is concluded that the German version of the IDS is a useful instrument for the assessment of depressive symptoms and that it has the same highly acceptable psychometric properties as the original English version. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords: BDI, bipolar disorder, depression, HRSD, IDS, rating scale, reliability, validity

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (133.3 KB).

REFERENCES

  1. American Psychiatric Association (APA) . Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM‐IV). Washington, DC: APA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  2. Beck AT, Steer RA, Ball R, Ranieri WF. Comparison of Beck Depression Inventories‐IA and ‐II in psychiatric out‐patients. J Pers Assess 1996; 67: 588–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh J. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1961; 4: 53–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences. New York: Erlbaum, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  5. Corruble E, Legrand JM, Duret C, Charles G, Guelfi JD. IDS‐C and IDS‐SR: psychometric properties in depressed in‐patients. J Affect Disord 1999; 56: 95–101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dilling H, Mombour W, Schmidt MH, Schulte‐Markwort E. Internationale Klassifikation psychischer Störungen. IDC‐10, Kapitel V (F); Dignostische Kriterien für Forschung und Praxis. Bern: Huber, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  7. Fava M, Rush AJ, Trivedi MH, Nierenberg AA, Thase ME, Sackeim HA, Quitkin FM, Wisniewski S, Lavori PW, Rosenbaum JF, Kupfer DJ. Background and rationale for the sequenced treatment alternatives to relieve depression (STAR*D) study. Psychiatr Clin North Am 2003; 26: 457–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hamilton M. A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1960; 23: 56–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Montgomery SA, Asberg MA. A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry 1979; 134: 382–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Post RM, Nolen WA, Kupka RW, Denicoff KD, Leverich GS, Keck PE, McElroy SL, Rush AJ, Suppes T, Altshuler LL, Frye MA, Grunze H, Walden J. The Stanley foundation bipolar network. I. Rationale and methods. Br J Psychiatry 2001; 41: 169–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rush AJ, Hiser W, Gilles DE. A comparison of self‐reported versus clinician‐rated symptoms in depression. J Clin Psychiatry 1987; 48: 246–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rush AJ, Guillion CM, Basco MR, Jarret RB, Trivedi MH. The Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS): psychometric properties. Psychol Med 1996; 26: 477–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rush AJ, Gilles DE, Schlesser MA, Fulton CL, Weissenburger J, Burns C. The Inventory for Depressive Symptomatology (IDS): preliminary findings. Psychiatry Res 1986; 18: 65–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Rush AJ, Trivedi MH, Ibrahim HM, Carmody TJ, Arnow B, Klein DN, Markowitz JC, Ninan PT, Kornstein S, Manber R, Thase ME, Kocsis JH, Keller MB. The 16‐item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS), clinician rating (QIDS‐C), and self‐report (QIDS‐SR): a psychometric evaluation in patients with chronic major depression. Biol Psychiatry 2003; 54: 573–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Svanborg P, Asberg M. A comparison between the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and the self‐rating version of the Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). J Affect Disord 2001; 64: 203–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Tondo L, Carmody TJ, Weissenburger J, Rush J. Comparison between clinician‐rated and self‐reported depressive symptoms in Italian psychiatric patients. Neuropsychobiology 1988; 19: 1–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Trivedi MH, Rush AJ, Ibrahim HM, Carmody TJ, Biggs MM, Suppes T, Crismon ML, Shores‐Wilson K, Toprac MG, Dennehy EB, Witte B, Kashner TM. The Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, clinician rating (IDS‐C) and self‐report (IDS‐SR), and the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, clinician rating (QIDS‐C) and self‐report (QIDS‐SR) in public sector patients with mood disorders: a psychometric evaluation. Psychol Med 2004; 34: 73–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Zimmerman M, Coryell W. The Inventory to Diagnose Depression (IDD): a self‐report scale to diagnose major depressive disorder. J Consult Clin Psychol 1987; 55: 55–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Zimmerman M, Posternak MA, Chelminski I. Is it time to replace the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale as the primary outcome measure in treatment studies of depression? J Clin Psychopharmacol 2005; 25: 105–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES