Abstract
An enhancement to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM‐V) is currently under consideration, one that would enhance both the reliability and validity of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) diagnoses: the addition of a dimensional adjunct to each of the traditional categorical diagnoses of the DSM. We first review the history and context of this proposal and define the concepts on which this dimensional proposal is based. The advantages of dimensional measures over categorical measures have long been known, but we here illustrate what is known with a theoretical and a practical demonstration of the potential effects of this addition. Possible objections to the proposal are discussed, concluding with some general criteria for implementing this proposal. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Keywords: DSM, categorical, dimensional, diagnosis, power, precision
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (177.5 KB).
REFERENCES
- Borenstein M. Hypothesis testing and effect size estimation in clinical trials. Annal Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology 1997; 78: 5–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Caplan PJ. They say you're crazy: how the world's most powerful psychiatrists decide who's nomal. Cambridge, MA: Da Capo Press, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Cohen J. The cost of dichotomization. Appl Psychological Measurement 1983; 7(3): 249–53. [Google Scholar]
- Cohen J. The Earth is round (p < 0.05). Am Psychologist 1995; 49: 997–1003. [Google Scholar]
- Dar R, Serlin RC, Omer H. Misuse of statistical tests in three decades of psychotherapy research. J Consulting Clin Res 1994; 62: 75–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Donner A, Eliasziw M. Statistical implications of the choice between a dichotomous or continuous trait in studies of interobserver agreement. Biometrics 1994; 50: 550–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- First MB. Clinical utility: a prerequisite for the adoption of a dimensional approach in DSM. J Abnorm Psychol 2005; 114(4): 560–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hunter JE. Needed: a ban on the significance test. Psychological Sci 1997; 8(1): 3–7. [Google Scholar]
- Jacobson NS, Truax P. Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. J Consulting Clin Psychol 1991; 59(1): 12–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kirk SA, Kutchins H. The Selling of the DSM: The Rhetoric of Science in Psychiatry. New York: Aldine De Gruyter; 1992. [Google Scholar]
- Kraemer HC. Reporting the size of effects in research studies to facilitate assessment of practical or clinical significance. Psychoneuroendocrinology 1993; 17: 527–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kraemer HC. To increase power without increasing sample size. Psychopharmacology Bulletin, Special Feature: ACNP Proceedings 1991; 27(3): 217–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kraemer HC, O'Hara R. Categorical versus dimensional approaches to diagnosis: methodological challenges. J Psychiatric Res 2004; 38(1): 17–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kraemer HC, Thiemann S. How Many Subjects? Statistical Power Analysis in Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1987. [Google Scholar]
- Kraemer HC, Thiemann SA. A strategy to use ‘soft’ data effectively in randomized clinical trials. J Consulting Clin Psychol 1989; 57: 148–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kraemer HC, Frank E, Kupfer DJ. Moderators of treatment outcomes: clinical, research, and policy importance. J Am Med Assoc 2006; 296(10): 1–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kraemer HC, Periyakoil VS, Noda A. Tutorial in biostatistics: Kappa coefficients in medical research. Statistics in Medicine 2002; 21: 2109–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kraemer HC, Kazdin AE, Offord DR, Kessler RC, Jensen PS, Kupfer DJ. Measuring the potency of a risk factor for clinical or policy significance. Psychological Methods 1999; 4(3): 257–71. [Google Scholar]
- Kupfer DJ, Thase ME. Laboratory studies and valdity of psychiatric diagnosis: has there been progress? In Robbins LN, Barrett JE. (eds) The Validity of Psychiatric Diagnosis. New York: Raven Press, 1989, pp. 177–201. [Google Scholar]
- Lord FM, Novick MR. Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Reading, MA: Addison‐Wesley Publishing Company, 1968. [Google Scholar]
- Robins LN, Barrett JE (eds). The Validity of Psychiatric Diagnosis. New York: Raven Press, 1989. [Google Scholar]
- Robins E, Guze SB. Establishment of diagnostic validity in psychiatric illness: its application to schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 1970; 126: 983–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schmidt FL. Statistical significance testing and cumulative knowledge in psychology: implications for training of researchers. Psychological Methods 1996; 1(2): 115–29. [Google Scholar]
- Shrout PE. Should significance tests be banned? Introduction to a special section exploring the pros and cons. Psychological Sci 1997; 8(1): 1–2. [Google Scholar]
- Thompson B. Journal editorial policies regarding statistical significance tests: heat is to fire as p is to importance. Educat Psychol Rev 1999; 11: 157–69. [Google Scholar]
- Truett J, Cornfield J, Kannel WA. A multivariate analysis of the risk of coronary heart disease in Framingham. J Chronic Dis 1967; 20: 511–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilkinson L. The Task Force on statistical inference. Statistical methods in psychology journals: guidelines and explanations. Am Psychologist 1999; 54: 594–604. [Google Scholar]