Skip to main content
NCBI home page
International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research logoLink to International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
. 2008 Jun 10;17(Suppl 1):S83–S87. doi: 10.1002/mpr.243

Key future research questions on mediators and moderators of behaviour change processes for substance abuse

Jürgen Rehm 1,2,3,4,✉
PMCID: PMC6879073  PMID: 18543369

Abstract

In summarizing the key themes and results of the second meeting of the German Addiction Research Network ‘Understanding Addiction: Mediators and Moderators of Behaviour Change Process’, the following concrete steps forward were laid out to improve knowledge.

The steps included pleas to (1) redefine substance abuse disorders, especially redefine the concept of abuse and harmful use; (2) increase the use of longitudinal and life‐course studies with more adequate statistical methods such as latent growth modelling; (3) empirically test more specific and theoretically derived common factors and mechanisms of behavioural change processes; (4) better exploit cross‐regional and cross‐cultural differences.

Funding agencies are urged to support these developments by specifically supporting interdisciplinary research along the lines specified above. This may include improved forms of international funding of groups of researchers from different countries, where each national group conducts a specific part of an integrated proposal. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords: substance use disorders, behavioural change, mechanism, research

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (90.2 KB).

REFERENCES

  1. American Psychiatric Association . Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, text revision. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  2. Arminger G, Clogg CC, Sobel ME. Handbook of Statistical Modeling for the Social and Behavioural Sciences. New York: Plenum, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  3. Babor T, Caetano R, Casswell S, Edwards G, Giesbrecht N, Graham K et al. Alcohol: No Ordinary Commodity. Research and Public Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  4. Campbell DT. Reforms as experiments. Am J Psychol 1969; 24: 409–29. [Google Scholar]
  5. Campbell DT. Assessing the Impact of Planned Social Change. Hanover, NH: Dartmouth College, 1976. [Google Scholar]
  6. Chisholm D, Rehm J, van Ommeren M, Monteiro M. Reducing the global burden of hazardous alcohol use: a comparative cost‐effectiveness analysis. J Stud Alcohol 2004; 65: 782–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Compton WM, Cottler LB, Dorsey KB, Spitznagel L, Mager DE. Comparing assessments of DSM‐IV substance dependence disorders using CIDI‐SAM and SCAN. Drug Alcohol Depend 1996; 41: 179–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Degenhardt L, Hall W, Warner‐Smith M, Lynskey M. Illiicit drug use In Ezzati M, Lopez A, Rodgers A, Murray CJL. (eds) Comparative Quantification of Health Risks: Global and Regional Burden of Disease Attributable to Selected Major Risk Factors. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  9. Demyttenaere K, Bruffaerts R, Posada‐Villa J, Gasquet I, Kovess V, Lepine JP et al. Prevalence, severity, and unmet need for treatment of mental disorders in the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys. JAMA 2004; 291: 2581–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) . National Prevalence Estimates of Problem Drug Use in the European Union, 1995–2000. Lisbon: EMCDDA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  11. Grant BF, Harford TC, Muthen BO, Yi HY, Hasin DS, Stinson FS. DSM‐IV alcohol dependence and abuse: Further evidence of validity in the general population. Drug Alcohol Depend 2007; 86: 154–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Grant BF, Compton WM, Crowley TJ, Hasin DS, Helzer JE, Li T, Rounsaville BJ, Volkow ND, Woody GE. Errors in assessing DSM‐IV substance use disorders. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2007; 64: 379–380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Greenland S. Basic problems in interaction assessment. Environ Health Perspect 1993; 101: 59–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hasin DS, Liu X, Adlerson D, Grant BF. DSM‐IV alcohol dependence: a categorical or dimensional phenotype? Psychol Med 2006; 1–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hser Y, Hoffman V, Grella C, Anglin M. A 33‐year follow‐up of narcotics addicts. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2001; 58: 503–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lachman HM. An overview of the genetics of substance use disorders. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2006; 8: 133–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Muthen B. Latent variable modeling with longitudinal and multilevel data In Raftery A. (ed.) Sociological Methodology. Boston, MA: Blackwell Publishers, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  18. Muthen B. Should substance use disorders be considered as categorical or dimensional? Addiction 2006; 101: 6–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Muthen B, Asparouhov T. Item response mixture modeling: application to tobacco dependence criteria. Addict Behav 2006; 31: 1050–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Muthen B, Muthen L. The development of heavy drinking and alcohol‐related problems from ages 18 to 37 in a U.S. national sample. J Stud Alcohol 2000; 61: 290–300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Muthen B, Asparouhov T, Rebollo I. Advances in behavioural genetics modelling using Mplus: applications of factor mixture modeling to twin data. Twin Res Hum Genet 2006; 9: 313–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Pull CB, Saunders JB, Mavreas V, Cottler LB, Grant BF. Concordance between ICD‐10 alcohol and drug use disorder criteria and diagnoses as measured by the AUDADIS‐ADR, CIDI and SCAN: results of a cross‐national study. Drug Alcohol Depend 1997; 47: 207–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Rehm J. Gesellschaftsreform als soziales experiment – Ein unzetgemabes projekt oder der Ausweg aus erstarrten Sachzwangen in der alkoholpolitik [The effects of Nordic alcohol policies. What happens to drinking and harm when alcohol control change]. Sucht 2003; 49: 129–30. [Google Scholar]
  24. Rehm J, Room R, van den Brink W, Jacobi F. Alcohol use disorders in EU countries and Norway: an overview of the epidemiology. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2005a; 15: 377–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Rehm J, Room R, van den Brink W, Kraus L. Problematic drug use and drug use disorders in EU countries and Norway: an overview of the epidemiology. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2005b; 15: 389–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Rehm J, Room R, Graham K, Monteiro M, Gmel G, Sempos CT. The relationship of average volume of alcohol consumption and patterns of drinking to burden of disease – an overview. Addiction 2003; 98: 1209–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Room R. Alcohol and drug disorders in the International Classification of Diseases: a shifting kaleidoscope. Drug Alcohol Rev 1998; 17: 305–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Rounsaville BJ, Kendall B, Babor T, Kranzler H, Kadden R. Cross system agreement for substance use ddisorders: DSM‐III‐R, DSM‐IV and ICD‐10. Addiction 1993; 88: 337–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Singer JD, Willett JB. Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  30. United Nations Drug Control Programme (UNDCP) . Global Illicit Drug Trends 2000. Vienna: UNDCP, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  31. Üstün BT, Compton W, Mager D, Babor T, Baiyewu O, Chatterji S et al. WHO study on the reliability and validity of the alcohol and drug use disorder instruments. Overview of methods and results. Drug Alcohol Depend 1997; 47: 161–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Vaillant GE. Natural History of Alcoholism Revisited. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  33. Vaillant GE. Natural history of addiction and pathways to recovery In Graham AW, Schultz TK, Wilford BB. (eds) Principles of Addiction Medicine. Chevy Chase, MD: American Society of Addiction Medicine, Inc., 1998. [Google Scholar]
  34. Vaillant GE. 60‐year follow‐up of alcoholic men. Addiction 2003; 98: 1043–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. World Health Organization (WHO) . The ICD‐10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders: Diagnostic Criteria for Research. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1993. [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES