Abstract
This article describes two major studies (i.e. Project MATCH and the US Department of Veterans Affair Effectiveness Study) of mediators and moderators of drinking behavior change following treatment, and considers alternatives to the dominant paradigm that has guided treatment research for more than two decades. Both studies were designed to test the “Technology Model” of therapeutic change, which postulates that patient attributes and treatment process elements, respectively, constitute mediators and moderators of change in drinking and drug use following treatment. The studies show that matching to therapeutic orientation is not an essential ingredient to substantially enhanced outcomes, as previously believed. They also indicate that the mediational mechanisms underlying several of the most popular therapies are different than what is suggested by their proponents. The inability of the Technology Model to explain, much less improve, the effectiveness of addiction treatment suggests the need for a new paradigm. It may be more fruitful to look for matching in larger populations at the level of communities or treatment systems, where a wider range of settings and therapeutic interventions can be evaluated. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Keywords: mediators, moderators, drug abuse, alcohol abuse, treatment
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (90.3 KB).
REFERENCES
- Babor TF, Del Boca FK (eds). Treatment Matching in Alcoholism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Bühringer G. Allocating treatment options to patient profiles: clinical art or science? Addiction 2006; 101: 646–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cooney NL, Babor TF, DiClemente CC, Del Boca FK. Clinical and scientific implications of Project MATCH In Babor TF, Del Boca FK. (eds) Treatment Matching in Alcoholism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003, pp. 222–37. [Google Scholar]
- Donovan DM. Efficacy and effectiveness: complementary findings from two multisite trials evaluating outcomes of alcohol treatments differing in theoretical orientations. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1999; 23: 564–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Finney JW. Enhancing substance abuse treatment evaluations: examining mediators and moderators of treatment effects. Special Issue: Substance abuse treatment programs and processes. J Sub Abuse 1995; 7: 135–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ouimette PC, Finney JW, Gima K, Moos RH. A comparative evaluation of substance abuse treatment III. Examining mechanisms underlying patient‐treatment matching hypotheses for 12‐step and cognitive behavioral treatments for substance abuse. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1999a; 23: 545–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ouimette PC, Gima K, Moos RH, Finney JW. A comparative evaluation of substance abuse treatment: IV. The effect of comorbid psychiatric diagnoses on amount of treatment, continuing care, and 1‐year outcomes. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1999b; 23: 552–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Project MATCH Research Group . Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity: Project MATCH post treatment drinking outcomes. J Stud Alcohol 1997a; 58: 7–29. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Project MATCH Research Group . Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity: tests of the Project MATCH secondary a priori hypotheses. Addiction 1997b; 92: 1671–98. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]