Skip to main content
PMC home page
International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research logoLink to International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
. 2007 Jun 6;16(Suppl 1):S24–S33. doi: 10.1002/mpr.210

A dimensional option for the diagnosis of substance dependence in DSM‐V

John E Helzer 1,✉, Kathleen K Bucholz 2, Michael Gossop 3
PMCID: PMC6879089  PMID: 17623392

Abstract

In this paper we discuss the creation of dimensional equivalents for categorically defined substance use disorders (SUDs) in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM‐V), which now is being created. We begin with a review of the considerable literature that has accumulated on the dimensional properties of the SUDs. These studies have primarily examined the alcohol use disorders, but work relevant to other substances is reviewed as well. The weight of evidence indicates that SUDs fit well into a unidimensional concept.

We next discuss potential advantages, drawbacks, and challenges in developing a dimensional alternative for the SUDs and highlight some issues for an ongoing research agenda to further explore the challenges.

Finally we offer a specific proposal for a SUDs dimensional option for DSM‐V. The model we propose is based on, and would relate directly back to, the categorical criteria that will be created for the SUDs by the substance use diagnostic workgroup. It is our contention that offering a dimensional equivalent for the DSM‐V categories would be of great value, but that the categorical and dimensional definitions should be based on the same symptoms and closely linked. A dimensional scale that does not related directly to the categorical definition would be counterproductive. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords: DSM‐V, substance disorders, dimensional diagnosis

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (194.1 KB).

REFERENCES

  1. American Psychiatric Association (APA) . Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM‐III, 3rd edition Washington, DC: APA, 1980. [Google Scholar]
  2. American Psychiatric Association (APA) . Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM‐III‐R, revised 3rd edition Washington, DC: APA, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  3. American Psychiatric Association (APA) . Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM‐IV, 4th edition Washington, DC: APA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bryant KJ, Rounsaville BJ, Babor TF. Coherence of the dependence syndrome in cocaine users. Br J Addict 1991; 86: 1299–1310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bucholz KK, Heath AC, Reich T, Hesselbrock VM, Kramer JR, Nurnberger JI Jr, Schuckit MA. Can we subtype alcoholism? A latent class analysis of data from relatives of alcoholics in a multicenter family study of alcoholism. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1996; 20: 1462–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Edwards G. The alcohol dependence syndrome: usefulness of an idea In Edwards G, Grant M. (eds) Alcoholism, Medicine, and Psychiatry: New Knowledge and New Responses. London: Croom Helm, 1977. [Google Scholar]
  7. Edwards G. The alcohol dependence syndrome: a concept as stimulus to enquiry. Br J Addict 1986; 81: 171–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Edwards G, Gross MM. Alcohol dependence: provisional description of a clinical syndrome. Br Med J 1976; 1: 1058–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Feingold A, Rounsaville B. Construct validity of the dependence syndrome as measured by DSM‐IV for different psychoactive substances. Addiction 1995; 90: 1661–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gossop M, Darke S, Griffiths P, Hando J, Powis B, Hall W, Strang J. The Severity of Dependence Scale (SDS): psychometric properties of the SDS in English and Australian samples of heroin, cocaine and amphetamine users. Addiction 1995; 90: 607–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gossop M, Stewart D, Marsden J. Effectiveness of drug and alcohol counselling during methadone treatment: content, frequency, and duration of counselling and association with substance use outcomes. Addiction 2006; 101: 404–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Grant BF, Moore TC, Shepard J, Kaplan K. Source and accuracy statement: Wave I National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC). Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  13. Grant BF, Stinson FS, Dawson DA, Chou SP, Dufour MC, Compton W, Pickering RP, Kaplan K. Prevalence and co‐occurrence of substance use disorders and independent mood and anxiety disorders: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2004; 61: 807–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hall W, Saunders JB, Babor TF, Aasland OG, Amundsen A, Hodgson R, Grant M. The structure and correlates of alcohol dependence: WHO collaborative project on the early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption – III. Addiction 1993; 88: 1627–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Harford TC, Muthen BO. The dimensionality of alcohol abuse and dependence: a multivariate analysis of DSM‐IV symptom items in the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth. J Stud Alcohol 2001; 62: 150–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hasin DS, Grant BF, Harford TC, Endicott J. The drug dependence syndrome and related disabilities. Br J Addict 1988; 83: 45–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hasin DS, Liu X, Alderson D, Grant BF. DSM‐IV alcohol dependence: a categorical or dimensional phenotype? Psychol Med 2006; 36: 1695–1705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hasin DS, Muthuen B, Wisnicki KS, Grant B. Validity of the bi‐axial dependence concept: a test in the U.S. general population. Addiction 1994; 89: 573–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Heath AC, Bucholz KK, Slutske WS, Madden PAF, Dinwiddie SH, Dunne MP, Statham DB, Whitfield JB, Martin NG, Eaves LJ. The assessment of alcoholism in surveys of the general community: what are we measuring? Some insights from the Australian twin panel interview survey. Int Rev Psychiatry 1994; 6: 295–307. [Google Scholar]
  20. Helzer JE, Robins LN, McEvoy LT, Spitznagel EL, Stoltzman RK, Farmer A, Brockington IF. A comparison of clinical diagnostic interview schedule diagnoses. Physician reexamination of lay‐interviewed cases in the general population. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1985; 42: 657–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hughes JR, Oliveto AH, Riggs R, Kenny M, Liguori A, Pillitteri JL, MacLaughlin MA. Concordance of different measures of nicotine dependence: two pilot studies. Addict Behav 2004; 29: 1527–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Jellinek EM. The disease concept of alcoholism. New Brunswick, NY: Hillhouse Press, 1960. [Google Scholar]
  23. Johnson EO, Breslau N, Anthony JC. The latent dimensionality of DIS/DSM‐III‐R nicotine dependence: exploratory analyses. Addiction 1996; 91: 583–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kahler CW, Strong DR. A Rasch model analysis of DSM‐IV Alcohol abuse and dependence items in the National Epidemiological Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2006; 30: 1165–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kahler CW, Strong DR, Hayaki J, Ramsey SE, Brown RA. An item response analysis of the Alcohol Dependence Scale in treatment‐seeking alcoholics. J Stud Alcohol 2003; 64: 127–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kahler CW, Strong DR, Read JP, Palfai TP, Wood MD. Mapping the continuum of alcohol problems in college students: a Rasch model analysis. Psychol Addict Behav 2004; 18: 322–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kalivas PW, Volkow ND. The neural basis of addiction: a pathology of motivation and choice. Am J Psychiatry 2005; 162: 1403–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kirisci L, Tarter RE, Vanyukov M, Martin C, Mezzich A, Brown S. Application of item response theory to quantify substance use disorder severity. Addict Behav 2006; 31: 1035–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kirisci L, Vanyukov M, Dunn M, Tarter R. Item response theory modeling of substance use: an index based on 10 drug categories. Psychol Addict Behav 2002; 16: 290–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kosten TR, Rounsaville BJ, Babor TF, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. Substance‐use disorders in DSM‐III‐R. Evidence for the dependence syndrome across different psychoactive substances. Br J Psychiatry 1987; 151: 834–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kraemer HC, Noda A, O'Hara R. Categorical versus dimensional approaches to diagnosis: methodological challenges. J Psychiatr Res 2004; 38: 17–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kraemer HC. DSM categories and dimensions in clinical and research contexts. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Krueger RF, Nichol PE, Hicks BM, Markon KE, Patrick CJ, Iacono WG, McGue M. Using latent trait modeling to conceptualize an alcohol problems continuum. Psychol Assess 2004; 16: 107–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Langenbucher JW, Labouvie E, Martin CS, Sanjuan PM, Bavly L, Kirisci L, Chung T. An application of item response theory analysis to alcohol, cannabis, and cocaine criteria in DSM‐IV. J Abnorm Psychol 2004; 113: 72–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Lanza ST, Flaherty BP, Collins LM. Latent class and latent transition analysis In Schinka JA, Velicer WF. (eds) Handbook of Psychology: Vol 2. Research Methods in Psychology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2003, pp. 663–85. [Google Scholar]
  36. Lynskey MT, Nelson EC, Neuman RJ, Bucholz KK, Madden PAF, Knopik VS, Slutske W, Whitfield JB, Martin NG, Heath AC. Limitations of DSM‐IV operationalizations of alcohol abuse and dependence in a sample of Australian twins. Twin Res Hum Genet 2005; 8: 574–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Martin CS, Chung T, Kirisci L, Item Langenbucher JW. Response Theory analysis of diagnostic criteria for alcohol and cannabis use disorders in adolescents: implications for DSM‐V. J Abnorm Psychol 2006; 115: 807–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Morey LC, Skinner HA. Empirically derived classifications of alcohol related problems In Galanter M. (ed.) Recent developments in alcoholism, Volume IV. New York: Plenum Publishing, 1986, pp. 145–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Morey LC, Skinner HA, Blashfield RK. A typology of alcohol abusers: correlates and implications. J Abnorm Psychol 1984; 93: 408–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Morgenstern J, Langenbucher J, Labouvie EW. The generalizability of the dependence syndrome across substances: an examination of some properties of the proposed DSM‐IV dependence criteria. Addiction 1994; 89: 1105–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Morley KC, Teesson M, Reid SC, Sannibale C, Thomson C, Phung N, Weltman M, Bell JR, Richardson K, Haber PS. Naltrexone versus acamprosate in the treatment of alcohol dependence: a multi‐centre, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial. Addiction 2006; 101: 1451–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Muthen BO. Factor analysis of alcohol abuse and dependence symptom items in the 1988 National Health Interview Survey. Addiction 1995; 90: 637–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Muthen BO. Psychometric evaluation of diagnostic criteria: application to a two‐dimensional model of alcohol abuse and dependence. Drug Alcohol Depend 1996; 41: 101–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Muthen B, Asparouhov T. Item response mixture modeling: application to tobacco dependence criteria. Addict Behav 2006; 31: 1050–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Muthen BO, Grant B, Hasin D. The dimensionality of alcohol abuse and dependence: factor analysis of DSM‐III‐R and proposed DSM‐IV criteria in the 1988 National Health Interview Survey. Addiction 1993a; 88: 1079–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Muthen BO, Hasin D, Wisnicki KS. Factor analysis of ICD‐10 symptom items in the 1988 National Health Interview Survey on Alcohol Dependence. Addiction 1993b; 88: 1071–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Nelson CB, Rehm J, Ustun TB, Grant B, Chatterji S. Factor structures for DSM‐IV substance disorder criteria endorsed by alcohol, cannabis, cocaine and opiate users: results from the WHO reliability and validity study. Addiction 1999; 94: 843–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Proudfoot H, Baillie AJ, Teesson M. The structure of alcohol dependence in the community. Drug Alcohol Depend 2006; 81: 21–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Radzius A, Gallo J, Gorelick DA, Cadet JL, Uhl G, Henningfield JE, Moolchan ET. Nicotine dependence criteria of the DIS and DSM‐III‐R: a factor analysis. Nicotine Tob Res 2004; 6: 303–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Rohan WP. Quantitative dimensions of alcohol use for hospitalized problem drinkers. Dis Nerv Syst 1976; 37: 154–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Saha TD, Chou SP, Grant BF. Toward an alcohol use disorder continuum using item response theory: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Psychol Med 2006; 36: 931–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Saha TD, Stinson FS, Grant BF. The role of alcohol consumption in future classifications of alcohol use disorders. Drug Alcohol Depend 2007; 89: 82–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Strong DR, Kahler CW, Ramsey SE, Brown RA. Finding order in the DSM‐IV nicotine dependence syndrome: a Rasch analysis. Drug Alcohol Depend 2003; 72: 151–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Teesson M, Lynskey M, Manor B, Baillie A. The structure of cannabis dependence in the community. Drug Alcohol Depend 2002; 68: 255–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. World Health Organization (WHO) . Severity of Dependence Scale (SDS). Available online: http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/research_tools/severitydependencescale/en (12 December 2006). ; Adapted from: Gossop M, Darke S, Griffiths P, Hando J, Powis B, Hall W, Strang J. The Severity of Dependence Scale (SDS): psychometric properties of the SDS in English and Australian samples of heroin, cocaine and amphetamine users. Addiction 1995; 90: 607–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES