Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 15.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE Photonics Technol Lett. 2019 Feb 1;31(6):423–426. doi: 10.1109/LPT.2019.2896840

Fabry-Pérot optical sensor and portable detector for monitoring high-resolution ocular hemodynamics

Jeong Oen Lee 1, Vinayak Narasimhan 2, Ashwin Balakrishna 3, Marcus R Smith 4, Juan Du 5, David Sretavan 5, Hyuck Choo 6
PMCID: PMC6879107  NIHMSID: NIHMS1523979  PMID: 31772487

Abstract

Our understanding of ocular hemodynamics and its role in ophthalmic disease progression remains unclear due to the shortcomings of precise and on-demand biomedical sensing technologies. Here, we report high-resolution in vivo assessment of ocular hemodynamics using a Fabry-Pérot cavity-based micro-optical sensor and a portable optical detector. The designed optical system is capable of measuring both static intraocular pressure and dynamic ocular pulsation profiles in parallel. Through a dynamic intensity variation analysis method which improves sensing resolution by 3–4 folds, our system is able to extract systolic/diastolic phases from a single ocular pulsation profile. Using a portable detector, we performed in vivo studies on rabbits and verified that ophthalmic parameters obtained from our optical system closely match with traditional techniques such as tonometry, electrocardiography, and photo-plethysmography.

Index Terms: optical sensing, portable detector, Fabry-Pérot interferometer, implantable sensor, intraocular pressure sensor, ocular hemodynamics

I. Introduction

AS AN organ, the eye requires constant perfusion during dynamic changes in blood pressure. While intraocular pressure (IOP) and ocular pulsation amplitude (OPA) are key ophthalmic parameters in glaucoma research, increasing evidence suggests that vascular abnormality and altered ocular hemodynamics also play important roles in the progression of open angle glaucoma[1],[2]. To date, various engineering efforts and clinical studies are underway to create an adequate examination platform for investigating ocular hemodynamics from a pathological point-of-view[3].

Typical ocular assessment and early studies on ocular hemodynamics were performed by using the Pascal Dynamic Contour Tonometer (DCT)[4]. Other techniques for monitoring ocular hemodynamics include high-resolution imaging instruments such as the Color Doppler imager[5], Laser Doppler Flowmeter[6] and Fourier-Domain Ocular Coherent Tomorgraphy[7]. However, these techniques require highly skilled, experienced technicians, and they are unsuitable for on-demand, continual, point-of-care (PoC) or self-monitoring applications [8].

In contrast, implantable device technologies [912] are able to collect detailed physiological data such as IOP from patients on-demand and have received growing attention in clinical ophthalmology[13]. Furthermore, significant advances have been made in the development of implantable photonic device technologies[14] thereby demonstrating unique advantages including battery-free operation, compact size, and high-sensitivity in biomedical applications. One way to achieve a miniaturized optical pressure sensor is combining a micro Fabry-Pérot (FP) interferometer [1518] with pressure sensitive membrane and subsequently mapping the spectral-shift to the different pressure states. Similarly, photonic crystals[19],[20] and optical strain sensors[21] were also suggested for optical IOP sensing applications[22],[23].

However, while most of emerging implantable sensors and optical readout approaches focus on the measurement of static IOP, they have never demonstrated the detection of (i) dynamic ocular pulsation profiles and (ii) multiple ophthalmic parameters such as IOP, OPA and arterial parameters in parallel through implantable system platform. In order to obtain clinically important information included in ocular hemodynamics, optically-driven implantable ocular devices should provide sufficiently high pressure-sensitivity and time-resolution coupled with efficient signal processing.

II. System Overview

To address the aforementioned needs, we have used an implantable FP cavity-based micro-optomechanical sensor (Fig. 1a) and a convenient handheld detector (Fig. 1b) for fast and accurate measurements of dynamic ocular pulsation. Previously, we reported only static IOP monitoring for glaucoma through a wavelength-shift (Δλ) method[24, 25] that relies on the shift of the FP cavity resonance based on IOP. In this work, however, exploiting a newly developed dynamic intensity variation (DIVA) analysis technique, the pressure sensitivity is improved 3–4-folds compared to our previous method. As a result, the system allows us to accurately discern the ocular pulsation pattern in the spectral measurements and subsequently extract the systolic and diastolic phases from each ocular pulse. As the ocular pulse represents blood pressure fluctuations that propagate through the ophthalmic artery (Fig. 1c), we validated our ocular hemodynamic assessment through a comparison with conventional cardiovascular monitoring devices such as ECG and PPG (Fig. 1d). In parallel, static IOP and OPA were concurrently extracted with the Δλ method, enabling multi-parameter monitoring from a single optical spectral acquisition.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

In vivo ocular pulsation monitoring system. (a) Schematic of an implantable optomechanical cavity-based sensor (top) and a tilted 3D illustration of the sensor (bottom). (b) Simplified diagram of the remote optical detector. (c) A test subject with (d) the detection system.

III. Device and Detection System

The implantable microscale optical sensor consists of two halves – (i) a flexible and deformable silicon nitride (Si3N4) membrane and (ii) a reflective mirror-like silicon (Si) surface both fabricated through silicon micromachining techniques (Fig. 2a)[24]. The two halves are separated by a recess and hermetically sealed together to form a FP cavity with diameters range from 600–900 μm. When the ambient pressure changes, i.e. IOP spikes, the flexible Si3N4 membrane deforms, thereby shifting the resonance spectrum of the cavity. This shift is detected through reflection spectroscopy by illuminating the sensor with noninvasive broadband light (Fig. 2b).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

All-optical intraocular sensor implant and assessment system. (a) Implantable optomechanical sensor. (b) Optical spectrum of the optomechanical sensor in low and high pressures. (c) Handheld optical detector. (d) Design scheme and components of the handheld detector.

The miniaturized handheld and portable optical detector is shown in Fig. 2c. The compact handheld framework is inspired by a monocular ophthalmoscope. The schematic of the detecting system is shown in Fig. 2d. Powered by commercial batteries (AAA 1.5V, Duracell Inc., USA), it incorporates miniaturized, low-cost optical components, including a dichroic short pass filter (<750nm, Edmund Optics Inc., USA), an objective lens (f = 35.0 mm, Ø1”, Thorlabs Inc., USA), and a tungstenfilament light source, all housed in a lightweight plastic casing weighing 159 g. An optical fiber connected to the detector relays the reflected light to a commercial broadband VISNIR mini-spectrometer (780–1180 nm, MAYA 2000 Pro-NIR, Ocean Optics, USA) that collects the resonance spectra of the sensor implant. The manipulation of the portable detector is simple, similar to using magnifying lenses that are commonly available in clinics and home, and a user can easily locate the implanted sensor through either an eyepiece or an attached camera.

IV. Results and Analysis

We characterized the fabricated micro-optical sensor under a pressure-ramp (0 – 40 mmHg) on a benchtop test[24]. After the benchtop characterization and surgical implantation, we validated in vivo functionality of the system using the Δλ method first. Then, a comparison study between the Δλ method and the DIVA technique was carried out.

Reflected spectra were obtained from the sensor implanted in the anterior chamber of a New Zealand white rabbit using the portable handheld detector (Fig. 3a and b). High signal-to-noise ratio (SNR ~ 17 dB) in vivo resonance spectra from the sensor are shown in Fig. 3c. In the measurement corresponding to Fig. 3c, we processed collected spectra (n=37) with high SNR and obtained a mean IOP value of 14.1 mmHg. This IOP baseline was consistent with rebound tonometry measurements taken concurrently for reference (14 mmHg ± 1.8 mmHg, TonoVet, Icare, USA). Next, by tracking the dynamic Δλ over time with the sampling frequency of 100 Hz, a periodically fluctuating waveform upon the time-variant IOP profile can be plotted as shown in Fig. 3d. The OPA is the pressure difference between the minimum (or diastolic) and maximum (or systolic) values of the pulsatile IOP pattern[4]. The pulsatile waveform indicates an OPA of 1.8 – 2.2 mmHg. The OPA frequency of 4.9 Hz is obtained using Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) analysis (Fig. 3e). To confirm if this frequency component is induced by cardiac activities, we conducted a reference blood-flow measurement using a photoplethysmography (PPG) device. Fig. 3f and g show that the OPA frequency is in good agreement with the cardiac hemodynamics.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

In vivo ocular pulsation measurement produced using wavelength-shift (Δλ). (a) In vivo sensor measurement using the portable detector. (b) An implanted optomechanical sensor delivered into an anterior chamber of an awaken rabbit eye. A diameter of IOP sensor is 900 μm; dotted line showing the boundary of transparent silicone haptic (2 mm × 10 mm × 0.1 mm). The flexible haptic with our IOP sensor is placed on the iris. (c) Representative optical spectra showing cavity resonance shift in two different IOPs. SNR is 17 dB. Fig.4 (d) IOP and OPA profile computed from the optical resonance detection. Black dots indicate raw data and solid-red line indicates the fitted curve. (e) FFT spectra of the OPA profile measured by optical detecting system. (f) Reference PPG measurement indicating cardiac-driven hemodynamics. (g) FFT spectra of the PPG profile.

Further resolution improvement can be achieved by the DIVA method which measures relative intensity fluctuation (ΔI) in the resonance profile instead of detecting the wavelength location. The substantial sensitivity improvement using the intensity-based analysis can be understood with an illustration of the cavity resonance shift (Fig. 4a). This plot represents the resonance wavelength-shift property of the IOP sensor. Normally, the optical resonance spectrum of the sensor cavity shifts in the transverse direction along the x-axis as a function of pressure, and the blue and red curves indicate two different pressure states driven by ocular perfusion. Given our spectrometer-based detection scheme, the DIVA method can offer higher a detection resolution (DR, resolution/mmHg) than the wavelength-shift method for a given pressure change. This is attributed to Δ IP (photon count/mmHg) per minimum intensity resolution of the spectrometer (NI ≈ 150 photon counts corresponding to the floor noise) being greater than ΔλP (nm/mmHg) per minimum wavelength resolution of spectrometer (Nλ = 0.2 nm).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

High-resolution ocular pulsation profiling using the DIVA method. (a) Cavity resonance shift: the intensity change provides higher DR than the wavelength shift for a given pressure change. (b) ECG measurement setup. (c) recorded ECG profile for 1 second. (d) Low-resolution discretized cavity resonance detection through wavelength-shift in the sub-1-nm wavelength regime. (e) High-resolution continuous intensity detection with the same raw data used in (b). Note that the baseline intensity (I0) and the wavelength (λ0) are set at the local maximum pressure point (Phigh). Thus, the relative intensity-shift (ΔI = II0) and the wavelength-shift (Δλ = λλ0) are positive (ΔI > 0 and Δλ > 0) when the relative pressure decreases from Phigh to Plow.

To compare the proposed DIVA method to the original Δλ method, we performed the same optical spectrum measurements with a synchronized electrocardiogram (ECG) recording (Fig. 4b). The ECG profile representing the electrical signal of the heart was recorded by attaching three probing electrodes on the rabbit’s chest and collecting the data using a microcontroller (AD8232, Arduino, USA). The rabbit was anesthetized to minimize artifacts due to motion for reliable ECG recording (Fig. 4c). For a fair comparison, the optical spectra were first acquired, and the same raw data was analyzed using the DIVA ΔI and the Δλ methods, as shown in Fig. 4d and e respectively. The oscillatory pattern within both optical measurements corresponded to the ocular pulsation profile had an amplitude of ~1 mmHg and a frequency of 4 Hz. The frequency of this oscillation agrees with that of the concurrently taken ECG measurements that directly relates to cardiac cycles.

In the sub-1-nm regime of the Δλ detection method (Fig. 4d), the acquired data points become highly discretized, making the wavelength detection scheme ineffective for visualizing subtle fluidic fluctuations that arise as a result of ocular hemodynamics. The best mini-spectrometer available today offers a wavelength resolution Δλ of 0.2 nm (roughly the size of the diffraction grating). As shown in Fig. 4d and e, the Δλ detection scheme offered only 4–5-levels of resolution per 1.0 mmHg, while the DIVA method provides 12–20 levels, resulting in a 3–4-fold resolution improvement. In addition, the DIVA method allows for near real-time data processing of the same optical spectra.

Next, we applied the DIVA method to analyze in vivo resonance spectra, and we were able to clearly observe the periodic pulsation patterns in intensity for 10 seconds without any post signal processing (Fig. 5a). In the intensity profile, the low-frequency saw-tooth-like pattern (or the pattern with a pseudo-periodic dip that appears almost every 2.5 s) was attributed to the respiratory motion of the animal. The high-frequency component (~4 Hz) occurring between adjacent respiratory motions corresponds to the ocular pulsation profile. After removing the low-frequency components using a digital bandpass filter (pass band: 3–12 Hz), the ocular pulsation profile becomes distinguishable as shown in Fig. 5b. In the zoomed-in plot (Fig. 5c), systolic and diastolic phases of the ocular pulse are clearly discernible. The average time difference between the systolic and diastolic peak is 0.061 ± 0.022 sec (number of pulses n = 52). As a result, following the digital volume pulse method[26], the arterial stiffness index was calculated to be 4.53 ± 0.58 m/s, and the critical error was 1.5%. These values match well with those reported in literature[27].

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Systolic and diastolic phase classification using DIVA method. (a) Time-dependent in vivo intensity fluctuation during ocular assessment at the probing wavelength of 850 nm. (b) Filtered intensity profile processed by a digital bandpass filter (3–12Hz). The negative intensity change (ΔI < 0) indicates a pressure increase from Plow to PhighP > 0). (c) Zoomed-in intensity profile for 1.5 second presenting in vivo ocular pulsation profile and systolic/diastolic phases.

V. Conclusion

In this work, we report an all-optical approach for monitoring ocular hemodynamics at high-resolution. The system consists of a micro-optomechanical sensor and a portable hand-held detector. Compared with traditional ophthalmic examination tool, such as DCT, our approach allows comfortable characterization of fast-paced IOP fluctuations in detail and collection of various vital ophthalmic parameters. To faithfully characterize ocular hemodynamics that manifest as small-amplitude IOP fluctuations with fast temporal variations, we developed a DIVA method to improve the detection sensitivity of the system by 3–4-fold over the wavelength-shift-based IOP mapping algorithm, thereby resolving and enabling the proper analysis of systolic and diastolic phases within a single ocular pulsation profile. During in vivo testing, we successfully obtained multiple physiological parameters including IOP, OPA, and cardiac phases on ocular pulsation profile. Through this multi-parameter analysis and with advantages in accuracy, robustness, portability and cost-effectiveness, we hope to use this platform to better elucidate role of ocular hemodynamics fluctuations in the progression of glaucoma.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (No. EY024582), the Heritage Medical Research Institute, and Powell Foundation Award.

Contributor Information

Jeong Oen Lee, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA and now with the National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20852 USA (jeongoen.lee@nih.gov)..

Vinayak Narasimhan, Department of Medical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA (vnarasim@caltech.edu)..

Ashwin Balakrishna, Department of Electrical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125 (abalakri@caltech.edu)..

Marcus R. Smith, Microsmith Inc., Pine Grove, CA 95665, USA (ismith9999@aol.com).

Hyuck Choo, Department of Electrical Engineering and Department of Medical Engineering at California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125. He is also affiliated with Samsung Advanced Institute of Technology, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do 16678, Republic of Korea (hchoo@caltech.edu).

References

  • [1].Yüksel N, Karaba VL, Arslan A, Demirci A, and Çağlar Y, “Ocular hemodynamics in pseudoexfoliation syndrome and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma,” Ophthalmology, vol. 108, no. 6, pp. 1043–1049, 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Caprioli J and Coleman AL, “Blood pressure, perfusion pressure, and glaucoma,” American journal of ophthalmology, vol. 149, no. 5, pp. 704–712, 2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Hoffmann EM, Grus F-H, and Pfeiffer N, “Intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude using dynamic contour tonometry and contact lens tonometry,” BMC ophthalmology, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 4, 2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Robert YC, and Thiel MA, “Ocular pulse amplitude in healthy subjects as measured by dynamic contour tonometry,” Archives of ophthalmology, vol. 124, no. 8, pp. 1104–1108, 2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Kaiser HJ, SCHÖTZAU A, and Flammer J, “Blood-flow velocities in the extraocular vessels in normal volunteers,” American journal of ophthalmology, vol. 122, no. 3, pp. 364–370, 1996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Kimura I, Shinoda K, Tanino T, Ohtake Y, Mashima Y, and Oguchi Y, “Scanning laser Doppler flowmeter study of retinal blood flow in macular area of healthy volunteers,” British journal of ophthalmology, vol. 87, no. 12, pp. 1469–1473, 2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Li P et al. , “Visualization of the ocular pulse in the anterior chamber of the mouse eye in vivo using phase-sensitive optical coherence tomography,” Journal of Biomedical Optics, vol. 19, no. 9, p. 090502, 2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Harris A, Kagemann L, Ehrlich R, Rospigliosi C, Moore D, and Siesky B, “Measuring and interpreting ocular blood flow and metabolism in glaucoma,” Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology/Journal Canadien d’Ophtalmologie, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 328–336, 2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Chen G et al. , “A cubic-millimeter energy-autonomous wireless intraocular pressure monitor,” in Solid-State Circuits Conference Digest of Technical Papers (ISSCC), 2011 IEEE International, 2011, pp. 310–312: IEEE. [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Chow EY, Chlebowski AL, and Irazoqui PP, “A Miniature-Implantable RF-Wireless Active Glaucoma Intraocular Pressure Monitor,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 340–349, 2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Melki S, Todani A, and Cherfan G, “An implantable intraocular pressure transducer: initial safety outcomes,” JAMA ophthalmology, vol. 132, no. 10, pp. 1221–1225, 2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Shin K-S et al. , “Development of Novel Implantable Intraocular Pressure Sensors to Enhance the Performance in in vivo Tests,” Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 1896–1905, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Mansouri K and Shaarawy T, “Continuous intraocular pressure monitoring with a wireless ocular telemetry sensor: initial clinical experience in patients with open angle glaucoma,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 95, no. 5, pp. 627–629, 2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Humara M, Kwoka SJJ, Choi M, Yetisen AK, Cho S, and Yun S-H, “Toward biomaterial-based implantable photonic devices,” Nanophotonics, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 414–434, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Zhu Y and Wang A, “Miniature fiber-optic pressure sensor,” IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 447 – 449, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Bai Y, Qi Y, Dong Y, and Jian S, “Highly Sensitive Temperature and Pressure Sensor Based on Fabry–Perot Interference,” IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, vol. 28, no. 21, pp. 2471–2474, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Tian Y, Wu N, Zou X, Zhang Y, Barringhaus K, and Wang X, “A Study on Packaging of Miniature Fiber Optic Sensors for In-Vivo Blood Pressure Measurements in a Swine Model,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 3396–3402, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Li M, Wang M, and Li H, “Optical MEMS pressure sensor based on Fabry-Perot interferometry,” Optics Express, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 1497–1504, 2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Wong Y-P, Lorenzo S, and Solgaard O, “Design and Fabrication of Monolithic Photonic Crystal Fiber Acoustic Sensor,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 18, no. 19, pp. 7826 – 7832, 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Karrock T and Martina G, “Pressure sensor based on flexible photonic crystal membrane,” Biomedical optics express, vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 4901–491, 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Fernandes J, Kwon YH, Kim J-J, Liu H, Jiang H, and Jiang H, “High Contrast Grating Based Strain Sensor for Intraocular Applications,” Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 599–601, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Phan A, Truong P, Trumpp J, and Talke FE, “Design of an Optical Pressure Measurement System for Intraocular Pressure Monitoring,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 61–68. [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Chen P-J et al. , “Implantable micromechanical parylene-based pressure sensors for unpowered intraocular pressure sensing,” Journal of Micro-mechanics and Microengineering, vol. 17, pp. 1931–1938, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Lee JO et al. , “A microscale optical implant for continuous in vivo monitoring of intraocular pressure,” Microsystems & Nanoengineering, vol. 3, p. 17057, 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Narasimhan V et al. , “Multifunctional biophotonic nanostructures inspired by the longtail glasswing butterfly for medical devices,” Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 13, pp. 512–519, 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Simonetti GD, Eisenberger U, Bergmann IP, Frey FJ, and Mohaupt MG, “Pulse contour analysis: a valid assessment of central arterial stiffness in children?,” Pediatric nephrology, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 439–444, 2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Hayashi S, Obara S, Murakawa M, Hazama A, Kusanagi M, and Katsuda S.-i., “To what extent does aortic pulse wave velocity estimate early atherosclerosis in Kurosawa and Kusanagi-hypercholesterolemic rabbits?,” Hypertension Research, vol. 34, no. 5, p. 559, 2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES