Botulism is caused by botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT), the most poisonous substance known. BoNTs are also classified as tier 1 biothreat agents due to their high potency and lethality. The existence of seven BoNT serotypes (A to G), which differ by 35% to 68% in amino acid sequences, necessitates the development of serotype-specific countermeasures.
KEYWORDS: botulinum neurotoxin, safety, pharmacokinetics, monoclonal antibody, antibody combinations, phase 1 clinical trial, antitoxin, oligoclonal antibodies, recombinant antibodies
ABSTRACT
Botulism is caused by botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT), the most poisonous substance known. BoNTs are also classified as tier 1 biothreat agents due to their high potency and lethality. The existence of seven BoNT serotypes (A to G), which differ by 35% to 68% in amino acid sequences, necessitates the development of serotype-specific countermeasures. We present results of a phase 1 clinical study of an anti-toxin to BoNT serotypes C and D, NTM-1634, which consists of an equimolar mixture of four fully human IgG1 monoclonal antibodies (MAbs), each binding to nonoverlapping epitopes on BoNT serotypes C and D, resulting in potent toxin neutralization in rodents. This first in-human study evaluated the safety and pharmacokinetics of escalating doses of NTM-1634 administered intravenously to healthy adults. Three cohorts of eight healthy subjects received single intravenous doses of NTM-1634 at 0.33 mg/kg, 0.66 mg/kg, or 1 mg/kg or placebo. Follow-up examinations and pharmacokinetics evaluations were continued up to 121 days postinfusion. Subjects were monitored by using physical examinations, hematology and chemistry blood tests, and electrocardiograms. Pharmacokinetics parameters were estimated using noncompartmental methods. The results demonstrated that the materials were safe and well tolerated with the expected half-lives for human MAbs and with minimal antidrug antibodies detected over the dose ranges and duration of the study. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT03046550.)
INTRODUCTION
Botulism, an acute life-threatening flaccid paralysis affecting both humans and animals, is caused by botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) produced by the bacterium Clostridium botulinum and additional Clostridia species (1, 2). Naturally occurring botulism is an orphan disease, with approximately 120 cases/year in the United States. BoNTs are also classified as tier 1 biothreat agents, the highest level of classification, due to their high potency and lethality (3). As such, the U.S. government has funded the development of botulinum antitoxins, including those reported here.
Of the seven immunologically distinct types of BoNTs (A to G) (4–6), serotypes A, B, E, and F cause most of the naturally occurring human disease, including foodborne, wound, and intestinal botulism. Sequence analysis of BoNT/C and BoNT/D strains reveals the existence of mosaic toxins that contain portions of both BoNT/C and BoNT/D as well as sequences unique to the mosaics (7, 8). BoNT C/D has the sequence of BoNT/C for the amino-terminal two-thirds of the toxin but is 95% identical to the sequence of BoNT/D for the carboxy-terminal one-third. BoNT D/C has high identity with the BoNT/D amino terminus but shares a lower identity with the BoNT/C and BoNT/D carboxy termini (8). BoNT/C and BoNT/D most frequently intoxicate nonhumans, with BoNT/C and C/D causing botulism in avian species (9, 10) as well as feline and canine species; BoNT/D and D/C most frequently cause botulism in cattle (11, 12). BoNT/C and BoNT/D, however, can also cause botulism in humans (13). Two cases of foodborne botulism and one case of infant botulism have been attributed to BoNT/C (14). BoNT/D organisms have also been found in tainted ham that caused botulism in several individuals (15). BoNT/C blocks neuromuscular transmission in human neuromuscular junction preparations and causes prolonged inhibition of exocytosis in cerebellar granular neurons. Both BoNT/C and BoNT D/C cause lethal botulism in nonhuman primates exposed via the aerosol route. Finally, BoNT C/D is therapeutically active in treating dystonia in humans (16). These studies indicate that BoNT/C and BoNT/D and their mosaic toxins pose a similar biothreat as other BoNT serotypes. Thus, the development of countermeasures for all seven serotypes is a high priority of the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and the Department of Health and Human Services (17).
The only treatment for botulism is antitoxin. As a result, the Public Health Emergency Medical Countermeasure Enterprise (PHEMCE) has a requirement for polyclonal BoNT antitoxin for the national stockpile for intentional botulism (17). The current treatment for adult botulism is heptavalent (serotypes A to G) equine botulism antitoxin (BAT) (18). BAT is immunogenic, and hypersensitivity reactions have been reported, including serum sickness and asystole (18). BAT is an F(ab′)2 product with short serum half-lives (7.5 to 34.2 h), which eliminates its use for prevention of botulism and limits its effectiveness as a treatment. Relapses of human botulism after treatment have been noted presumably due to the short half-life of BAT and poorer potency against some BoNT subtypes (19). BAT requires slow intravenous (i.v.) infusion after dilution into a total volume of 200 ml. This combined with hypersensitivity reactions makes it a challenge to administer in mass casualty scenarios. As an alternative, we have been developing serotype-specific monoclonal antibody combinations (three monoclonal antibodies [MAbs]/serotype) that potently and neutralize BoNT by eliciting first-pass clearance through the liver. Combining the three MAbs increases the potency of BoNT/C neutralization by at least 3 orders of magnitude over that of individual antibodies (C. Garcia-Rodriguez, unpublished data). In addition, we have reported the generation of three-MAb combinations to BoNT/A (20–22), BoNT/B (23), BoNT/E (24), BoNT/F (25), and BoNT/H (26) that are effective in mouse models of botulism and where the three-MAb combinations are more potent than single MAbs by 2 to 3 orders of magnitude. The products for botulism due to serotype A (NTM-1631, formerly XOMA 3AB) have completed a phase 1 clinical trial with no serious adverse effects (27). Phase 1 clinical trials for three-antibody combinations to treat botulism due to BoNT/B (ClinicalTrials registration number NCT02779140) and BoNT/E (ClinicalTrials registration number NCT03603665) are ongoing.
For the treatment and prevention of BoNT/C and BoNT/D botulism, we have developed a four-MAb combination, NTM-1634, that consists of an equimolar coformulated mixture of four fully human IgG1 monoclonal antibodies (MAbs), all with the same constant regions, referred to as XCD-a, XCD-b, XCD-c, and XCD-d. These MAbs bind nonoverlapping epitopes on BoNT/C, BoNT/D, and their mosaic toxins with high affinity and neutralize each of these BoNTs in the mouse neutralization assay. Here, we report the results of a phase 1, single-center, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized dose escalation study whose purpose was to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics properties of NTM-1634.
RESULTS
Antibody characteristics.
NTM-1634 consists of four human MAbs isolated from yeast display libraries constructed from the antibody variable region genes of humans immunized with pentavalent botulinum toxoid (C. Garcia-Rodriquez et al, unpublished data). Each MAb binds a nonoverlapping BoNT epitope with high affinity (Table 1). Three of the MAbs bind all four BoNTs with an equilibrium dissociation constant (KD) of <10−9 M, while MAb XCD-b only binds BoNT/C and BoNT D/C. A combination of the four parental MAbs from which MAbs XCD-a, XCD-b, XCD-c, and XCD-d were derived had effective doses that protected 50% of mice (ED50s) challenged with 40,000 50% lethal doses (LD50s) of BoNT/C of 5.0 μg/mouse, of BoNT C/D of 7.5 μg/mouse, and of BoNT D/C of 7.5 μg/mouse (C. Garcia-Rodriquez et al, unpublished data).
TABLE 1.
Antibody name | No. of amino acids | Mol wt (kDa) |
KD (10−12 M) |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BoNT/C | BoNT C/D | BoNT D/C | BoNT/D | |||
XCD-a | 1,332 | 145,899 | 1.10 | 2.43 | 15.34 | 16.93 |
XCD-b | 1,338 | 146,476 | 35.79 | NBa | 0.80 | NB |
XCD-c | 1,338 | 146,463 | 11.79 | 37.81 | 83.95 | 96.20 |
XCD-d | 1,334 | 145,788 | 130.37 | 37.90 | 22.44 | 11.63 |
NB, no detectable binding at a BoNT concentration of 1 μM.
Subject demographic characteristics.
The use of 24 research participants was planned for these studies (Fig. 1). Twenty-five were enrolled, randomized, and included in the study. Randomized participants were administered either the NTM-1634 or placebo intravenously. No deaths or adverse events (AEs) leading to study discontinuation were reported. A summary of subject disposition is presented in Table 2. Two subjects from cohort B (0.66 mg/kg) were lost to follow-up. One subject who received placebo was lost to follow-up after day 2 and the other was lost to follow-up after day 57. The subject that was lost to follow-up after day 2 was replaced in cohort B at the time of cohort C (Fig. 1). A total of 18 research participants, six per cohort, received NTM-1634 (0.33 mg/kg, 0.66 mg/kg, or 1 mg/kg), and two research participants per cohort, six in total, received placebo. The doses were chosen to (i) deliver a dose of BoNT antitoxin that exceeded the current dose of BAT, (ii) achieve a serum concentration greater than the MAb KD for BoNT, and (iii) allow measurement of the concentration of each component MAb. For example, for a 70-kg subject, these doses would provide a total neutralizing capacity of 1.85 × 108, 3.70 × 108, and 5.6 × 108 mouse LD50s of BoNT/C based on the preclinical data described above. This compares to a single dose BoNT/C neutralizing capacity for BAT of 3.0 × 107 mouse LD50s.
TABLE 2.
Disposition | No. (%) treated with (mg/kg): |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.33 (n = 6) | 0.66 (n = 6) | 1 (n = 6) | Placebo (n = 7) | Total (n = 25) | |
All subjects randomized | 6 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 25 |
Subjects who were dosed (safety population) | 6 (100) | 6 (100) | 6 (100) | 7 (100) | 25 |
Subjects who completed study | 6 (100) | 5 (83) | 6 (100) | 6 (85.7) | 23 (92) |
Subjects who discontinued early from study | 0 | 1 (16.7) | 0 | 1 (14.3) | 2 (8) |
Lost to follow-up | 0 | 1 (16.7) | 0 | 1 (14.3) | 2 (8) |
The study participants ranged in age from 19 to 44 years. The majority of study subjects were white (17 [68%]), of Hispanic or Latino background (13 [52%]), and female (19 [74%]). The demographic characteristics were similar across the treatment groups except cohort C, where all the participants who received active compound were female. The demographic characteristics are summarized in Table 3.
TABLE 3.
Parameter | Value for group treated with (mg/kg): |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.33 (n = 6) | 0.66 (n = 6) | 1 (n = 6) | Placebo (n = 7) | Total (n = 25) | |
Age (yr) | |||||
Mean | 33.7 | 30.0 | 34.7 | 32.9 | 32.8 |
SD | 7.53 | 7.95 | 9.29 | 6.82 | 7.59 |
Minimum | 25 | 19 | 21 | 23 | 19 |
Maximum | 42 | 42 | 44 | 40 | 44 |
Sex (n [%]) | |||||
Male | 2 (33.3) | 2 (33.3) | 0 | 2 (28.6) | 6 (24.0) |
Female | 4 (66.7) | 4 (66.7) | 6 (100.0) | 5 (71.4) | 19 (76.0) |
Ethnicity (n [%]) | |||||
Hispanic or Latino | 4 (66.7) | 3 (50.0) | 3 (50.0) | 3 (42.9) | 13 (52.0) |
Not Hispanic or Latino | 2 (33.3) | 3 (50.0) | 3 (50.0) | 4 (57.1) | 12 (48.0) |
Race (n [%]) | |||||
Black or African American | 0 | 1 (16.7) | 3 (50.0) | 2 (28.6) | 6 (24.0) |
White | 5 (83.3) | 5 (83.3) | 2 (33.3) | 5 (71.4) | 17 (68.0) |
Other | 1 (16.7) | 0 | 1 (16.7) | 0 | 2 (8.0) |
Safety profile.
No deaths or AEs leading to study discontinuation were reported. Overall, two non-drug-related serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported. One subject in cohort B (0.66 mg/kg) had an SAE of exacerbation of schizophrenia and one subject in cohort C (1 mg/kg) had and SAE of wrist fracture. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 19 of 25 subjects (76%), with a total of 69 TEAEs reported over the course of the study (Table 4). Cohort A (0.33 mg/kg) had four of six (66.7%) reporting 18 TEAEs. Cohort B (0.66 mg/kg) had five of six (83.3%) reporting 21 TEAEs. Cohort C (1 mg/kg) had six of six (100%) subjects reporting 20 TEAEs. The placebo group had four of seven (57.1%) subjects reporting 10 TEAEs. The most frequently reported TEAE was blood creatine phosphokinase increase, which occurred in 5 (20%) of the subjects. The next most frequently reported TEAEs (reported in two or more subjects overall) were hemoglobin decreases, hematuria, hematocrit decreases, viral upper respiratory tract infection, white blood cell count decreases, blood calcium decreases, blood potassium increases, blood sodium increases, cough, hypernatremia, myalgia, neutrophil count decreases, and proteinuria. There were no clinically significant abnormal electrocardiograms (ECGs) nor were there clinically meaningful trends identified comparing baseline vital and ECG values to those at subsequent time points. All TEAEs were considered by the investigator to be “not related” to the study drug. Antidrug antibody (ADA) results were negative for all participants with the exception of one subject who had a positive ADA result with a titer of 1.2 ng/ml for MAb XCD-b predose on day 1. All postdose ADA results were negative for this participant. The significance of this finding is unknown, but it may be due to the setting of the cut point for ADA detection. The subject did not report any past medical history and experienced no AEs during the study.
TABLE 4.
TEAE | 0.33 mg/kg (n = 6) |
0.66 mg/kg (n = 6) |
1 mg/kg (n = 6) |
All active (n = 18) |
Placebo (n = 7) |
Total (n = 25) |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No. (%) of subjects | No. of events | No. (%) of subjects | No. of events | No. (%) of subjects | No. of events | No. (%) of subjects | No. of events | No. (%) of subjects | No. of events | No. (%) of subjects | No. of events | |
Blood creatine phosphokinase increased | 1 (16.7) | 1 | 1 (16.7) | 1 | 3 (50.0) | 3 | 5 (27.8) | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 (20.0) | 5 |
Hemoglobin decreased | 1 (16.7) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 (33.3) | 2 | 3 (16.7) | 3 | 1 (14.3) | 1 | 4 (16.0) | 4 |
Hematuria | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (16.7) | 1 | 1 (5.6) | 1 | 2 (28.6) | 3 | 3 (12.0) | 4 |
Hematocrit decreased | 1 (16.7) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 (33.3) | 2 | 3 (16.7) | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 (12.0) | 3 |
Viral upper respiratory tract infection | 2 (33.3) | 2 | 1 (16.7) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 (16.7) | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 (12.0) | 3 |
White blood cell count decreased | 1 (16.7) | 1 | 1 (16.7) | 1 | 1 (16.7) | 1 | 3 (16.7) | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 (12.0) | 3 |
Blood calcium decreased | 1 (16.7) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (5.6) | 1 | 1 (14.3) | 1 | 2 (8.0) | 2 |
Blood potassium increased | 2 (33.3) | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 (11.1) | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 (8.0) | 2 |
Blood sodium increased | 1 (16.7) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (5.6) | 1 | 1 (14.3) | 1 | 2 (8.0) | 2 |
Cough | 0 | 0 | 1 (16.7) | 1 | 1 (16.7) | 1 | 2 (11.1) | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 (8.0) | 2 |
Hypernatremia | 0 | 0 | 2 (33.3) | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 (11.1) | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 (8.0) | 2 |
Myalgia | 1 (16.7) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 (16.7) | 1 | 2 (11.1) | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 (8.0) | 2 |
Neutrophil count decreased | 0 | 0 | 1 (16.7) | 1 | 1 (16.7) | 1 | 2 (11.1) | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 (8.0) | 2 |
Proteinuria | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 (28.6) | 2 | 2 (8.0) | 2 |
Total TEAEs | 11 | 7 | 12 | 8 | 38 |
Pharmacokinetics analysis.
A summary of the pharmacokinetics data is presented in Table 5. Peak concentrations for each of the antibodies, regardless of dose, were generally observed 1 to 2 h after the 1-h infusion. The peak concentrations of each of the four antibodies were also similar. After the peak, the concentrations of all four antibodies declined in a log-linear fashion, with a distinct distribution and terminal elimination phase (Fig. 2). Serum concentrations for XCD-a were quantifiable up to day 29 in 5 of 6 subjects, day 43 in 3 of 6 subjects, and day 57 in 1 of 6 subjects who received NTM-1634 0.33, 0.66, and 1 mg/kg, respectively. Serum concentrations of XCD-b were quantifiable up to day 91 in 2 of 6 subjects, day 121 in 2 of 6 subjects, and day 121 in 3 of 6 subjects who received NTM-1634 0.33, 0.66, and 1 mg/kg, respectively. Serum concentrations of XCD-c were quantifiable up to day 91 in 1 of 6 subjects, day 121 in 1 of 6 subjects, and day 121 in 1 of 6 subjects who received NTM-1634 0.33, 0.66, and 1 mg/kg, respectively. Serum concentrations of XCD-d were quantifiable up to day 57 in 2 of 6 subjects, day 91 in 2 of 6 subjects, and day 91 in 1 of 6 subjects who received NTM-1634 0.33, 0.66, and 1 mg/kg, respectively.
TABLE 5.
MAb | Cohort (dose [mg/kg]) | Cmax (ng/ml)/GeoCV% | Tmax (h [min, max]) | AUC0–t (μg·h/ml)/GeoCV% | AUC0–∞ (μg·h/ml)/GeoCV% | t1/2 (days)/GeoCV% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCD-a | A (0.33) | 1,762/11.2 | 1.00 (1.00, 2.00) | 207/16.4 | 2,745/8.8 | 10.9/11.4 |
B (0.66) | 3,805/19.3 | 1.50 (1.00, 2.00) | 525/28.1 | 635/11.1 | 10.6/17.5 | |
C (1) | 6,347/14.0 | 2.00 (1.00, 4.02) | 961/14.3 | 1,001/14.2 | 10.2/9.3 | |
XCD-b | A (0.33) | 1,969/10.7 | 2.00 (1.00, 2.08) | 591/28.9 | 739/17.5 | 24.3/16.6 |
B (0.66) | 4,296/21.3 | 1.00 (1.00, 2.00) | 1,530/21.4 | 1,674/21.3 | 24/28.4 | |
C (1) | 7,226/10.2 | 2.00 (1.00, 4.00) | 2,508/14.1 | 2,612/14.3 | 23.4/15.0 | |
XCD-c | A (0.33) | 1,877/10.0 | 1.00 (1.00, 2.00) | 542/22.6 | 624/22.3 | 20.2/18.1 |
B (0.66) | 4,149/23.6 | 1.00 (1.00, 2.00) | 1,339/23.8 | 1,492/20.7 | 22.3/27.5 | |
C (1) | 7,151/12.0 | 2.00 (1.00, 4.02) | 2,193/15.9 | 2,281/16.3 | 21.4/14.9 | |
XCD-d | A (0.33) | 1,830/14.0 | 2.00 (2.00, 4.00) | 403/15.6 | 463/17.8 | 15.9/19.1 |
B (0.66) | 4,080/17.7 | 1.00 (1.00, 4.00) | 990/25.4 | 1,083/25.2 | 17.8/35.0 | |
C (1) | 6,829/10.5 | 1.00 (1.00, 4.00) | 1,553/15.6 | 1,662/13.3 | 15.8/16.4 |
The dose-adjusted maximum concentrations of drug in serum (Cmaxs) for all four antibodies were similar across all three dose cohorts. In addition, the areas under the concentration-time curves from 0 to infinity (AUC0–∞s) for XCD-b and XCD-c were not different across all three dose cohorts, indicating dose proportionality over the 3-fold dose range. The areas under the concentration-time curves from 0 to infinity (AUC0–∞s) for XCD-a and XCD-d were lower than for XCD-b and XCD-c, with XCD-a having the lowest AUC0–∞ across all three dose cohorts. Each of the four MAb had long half-lives that varied from 10.2 to 24 days. XCD-b and XCD-c had longer half-lives (t1/2s) than either XCD-a or XCD-d, with XCD-a having the shortest t1/2 at 263 h. The basis for the differences in half-lives between MAbs is unclear, since the MAbs have similar pIs and have the same antibody constant regions. The overall pharmacokinetics of each of the four individual antibodies were roughly similar to each other, with the rank order of XCD-b having the longest half-life and AUC followed by XCD-c, XCD-d, and then XCD-a.
DISCUSSION
BoNTs are classified by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) as one of the highest-risk threat agents for bioterrorism due to their extreme potency and lethality, ease of production and transport, and need for prolonged intensive care (3). Thus, the development of countermeasures for all seven serotypes, including BoNT/C and BoNT/D, is a high research priority. Both Iraq and the former Soviet Union produced BoNT for use as weapons, and at least three additional countries (Iran, North Korea, and Syria) have developed or are believed to be developing BoNT as instruments of mass destruction (3, 28, 29). Iraq produced 19,000 liters of concentrated BoNT, more than any other biothreat agent, of which 10,000 liters were weaponized in missile warheads or bombs. The 19,000 liters represent an amount of toxin capable of killing the world’s population three times over. The Japanese cult Aum Shinrikyo attempted to use BoNT for bioterrorism by dispersing toxin aerosols at multiple sites in Tokyo (3).
Botulism causes significant morbidity and mortality, and exposure of even a small number of civilians would paralyze the health care delivery system of any metropolitan area. Treatment of botulism requires prolonged hospitalization in an intensive care unit (ICU) and mechanical ventilation for up to 6 weeks. There are no current logistically feasible prophylactic agents available in the United States as medical countermeasures. Antitoxin is the only effective treatment for botulism and has been shown to reduce the duration of hospitalization, duration of mechanical ventilation, and cost of hospitalization (30). The current treatment for adult botulism is heptavalent (serotypes A to G) equine botulism antitoxin (BAT) (18). BAT is immunogenic, and hypersensitivity reactions have been reported, including serum sickness and asystole (18, 31).
As an alternative and potentially safer and more effective product, we have been developing serotype-specific human or humanized MAb combinations that stoichiometrically neutralize BoNT by eliciting first-pass clearance through the liver (20, 27). In addition, these antibodies are being used in diagnostic tests to identify the specific serotype of botulinum neurotoxin that was causing the symptoms and provide guidance for treatment (32, 33). This study was the first in-human assessment of NTM-1634, a four-MAb combination which potently neutralizes BoNT/C, C/D, D/C, and D in rodents. The results demonstrate that single escalating doses of NTM-1634 administered intravenously into healthy subjects were well tolerated and safe. In addition, these doses also demonstrated acceptable immunogenicity profiles, with little ADA detected over the dose ranges and duration of the study. No dose-related SAEs were observed, and the AEs that were observed between the three cohorts and placebo group were similar in frequency, character, and severity. These results indicate that NTM-1634 may be a safer product than the equine polyclonal antibody BAT (18).
Previous studies with NTM-1634 have demonstrated that the effectiveness of NTM-1634 in neutralizing BoNT C/D is dependent on the presence of all four antibodies (C. Garcia-Rodriquez et al, unpublished data). This is consistent with observations for other anti-BoNT antibody combinations in development (20, 24, 25). It therefore follows that the duration of effectiveness of the combination will be determined by the monoclonal antibody that falls below the minimal effective levels most rapidly. The terminal t1/2s were similar across the range of doses for each antibody. At all doses given, however, XCD-a was cleared more rapidly than the other three, with XCD-d being the next most rapidly cleared. However, all antibodies were detectable for a minimum of 4 weeks, with the most rapidly clearing MAb, XCD-a, having a serum half-life of 11 days. This contrasts with BAT, which is an F(ab′)2 product with short serum half-lives for BoNT/C and BoNT/D (30 and 7.5 h, respectively). The long half-life of NTM-1634 may reduce the likelihood of a relapse of botulism that has been reported with BAT (19).
While we have not directly compared the potency of NTM-1634 to BAT for BoNT/C or BoNT/D, the potency of a BoNT/A MAb combination (NTM-1631) under development is 400- to 600-fold more potent than BAT in mouse protection studies with BoNT/A1, and a three-MAb combination to BoNT/F more than 150 to 450 times more potent than BAT (25, 27) on a weight basis. The lowest dose of NTM-1634 studied (0.33 mg/kg) would deliver a total BoNT/C neutralizing capacity of 1.85 × 108 mouse LD50s of BoNT/C based on the preclinical data described above. This compares to a single dose BoNT/C neutralizing capacity for BAT of 3.0 × 107 mouse LD50s, or more than 6-fold more. This greater potency is expected, since polyclonal antisera rarely have more than 1% of the total IgG directed against the target antigen, compared to ∼100% for recombinant IgG. The combined safety, potency, and long half-life of NTM-1634 make it possible for potential intramuscular or subcutaneous administration after exposure and prior to the development of symptoms, which is not possible with BAT. These features would make NTM-1634 simpler to administer in a mass casualty scenario. The high potency and long half-life would also permit administration of NTM-1634 for the prevention of botulism as an alternative to vaccination. This is important, since there is no longer a vaccine available to prevent types C and D botulism.
In summary, this study provides an early evaluation of the pharmacokinetics and safety profile of NTM-1634. The highly potent protection in animal models and the safety profile and long half-life of >1 month in humans demonstrate the potential utility of NTM-1634 for treatment of botulism due to serotypes C and D. Thus, further clinical development of NTM-1634 for the treatment and prevention of BoNT intoxication due to serotypes C and D is warranted.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This was a phase 1, single-center, placebo-controlled, double-blind dose escalation study to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics characteristics, and immunogenicity of NTM-1634 in healthy adults. This first in-human study consisted of three cohorts (A, 0.33 mg/kg; B, 0.66 mg/kg; C, 1 mg/kg) of eight subjects each. Each subject received a single i.v. infusion of NTM-1634 or placebo administered over 1 h. The placebo was normal saline.
NTM-1634.
NTM-1634 consists of four human single-chain Fv (scFv) MAbs isolated from yeast display libraries constructed from the antibody variable region genes of humans immunized with pentavalent botulinum toxoid (C. Garcia-Rodriquez et al, in preparation). The heavy- and light-chain variable region genes of the scFv were inserted into vectors containing the human kappa and IgG1 constant region genes to create human IgG1/kappa MAbs, and four separate stable CHO-K1 cell lines were established. The IgG1 isotype was selected on the basis of studies showing the importance of Fc receptor engagement for the synergy in potency seen when the MAbs are combined (J. D. Marks, unpublished data). Each MAb (XCD-a, XCD-b, XCD-c, and XCD-d) was expressed and purified individually using protein A and ion-exchange chromatography and then combined in equimolar amounts to create NTM-1634.
Subjects.
The study enrolled a total of 25 healthy adult volunteers. Subjects in all cohorts participated in the study for approximately 21 weeks, including a 4-week screening period, a 3-day inpatient stay, and approximately 17-week follow-up study after drug administration. Eligible research participants were healthy male or healthy, nonpregnant, nonlactating females between the ages of 18 and 45 years. Subjects had body mass indices of between 18.5 and 30 kg/m2, negative illicit drug screens, and adequate venous access for the infusion. Subjects were considered study ineligible if they had a history of a chronic medical condition that would interfere with the accurate assessment of the objectives of the study, a history of severe allergic reaction to any type of medications, bee stings, food, or environmental factor or reaction to immunoglobulins, positive serology for HIV, HBsAg, or hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibodies, were pregnant or breastfeeding, were previously exposed to BoNT and active drug, or have alcohol dependence. Research subjects who had received any monoclonal antibody in the past or any antibody or blood products, treatment with another investigational drug within 28 days of dosing, donated blood within 56 days of enrollment, or use of H1 antihistamines or beta-blockers within 5 days of dosing were also excluded. Additional exclusion criteria included a marked baseline prolongation of QT/QTc interval, clinically significant electrocardiogram, systolic blood pressure of >140 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure >90 mm Hg, resting heart rate <50 or >100 beats per min, or oral temperature of ≥38°C.
Study design.
Subjects were randomized into three cohorts of eight subjects and admitted to the study unit on day −1. Infusion occurred on day 1, and subjects remained at the clinic until discharge on day 2 (25 h after the infusion had ended). Follow-up visits occurred on days 3, 4, 8, 15, 29, 43, 57, 91, and 121. Safety parameters included physical examination, 12-lead ECG, vital signs, and clinical laboratory values. Pharmacokinetics samples were collected predose, at the end of infusion, 1, 3, 7, 23, 47, and 71 h postinfusion, and on days 8, 15, 29, 43, 57, 91, and 121 for all cohorts. Dose escalation did not occur until safety data from at least 7 subjects per cohort through day 8 were reviewed by the Safety Review Committee comprising the principal investigator (D. M. Snow), Ology Bioservices Medical Representative (C. N. Kraus), and the NIAID Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Medical Monitor.
For each dosing cohort, the first two subjects were randomized 1:1 active/placebo so that one of the first two subjects received active treatment and the other control. The treatment assignment of the remaining six subjects in each cohort was 3:1 active/placebo. The randomization list was generated by the unblinded study biostatistician and transferred to the unblinded study pharmacist prior to the start of the study. The study staff participating in the administration of the study product and assessment of subjects were not aware of the contents of the i.v. bag. Drug and placebo appeared identical.
The study drug was manufactured by XOMA Corporation (Berkeley, CA) and filled by Althea Technologies (San Diego, CA). Assays developed for NTM-1643 characterization and release were qualified using biological testing, including a MAb-specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent binding assay (ELISA) which used recombinant BoNT/C protein domains (22, 34 and G. Manzanarez et al., unpublished data), developed and qualified by Ology Bioservices, and an in vivo quadruple antibody protection assay in mice, developed and qualified in collaboration with SRI International (Menlo Park, CA). The investigational product was formulated as a 5-mg/ml, clear colorless, sterile aqueous solution in a pH 6.0 buffered vehicle without any preservatives. The drug product was supplied in 2-ml, pyrogen-free, type 1 glass vials. Placebo was a sterile, nonpyrogenic isotonic solution of 0.9% sodium chloride injection, USP grade, and water for injection. The placebo did not contain preservatives, bacteriostatic or antimicrobial agents, or added buffer. Normal saline was used to dilute the NTM-1634 for i.v. infusion and was supplied in single-dose plastic containers.
Safety analyses.
The safety endpoints were the occurrence of serious adverse events (SAEs) following administration of NTM-1634 to the final follow-up visit, the occurrence of adverse events (AEs) from administration of NTM-1634 to day 57, the occurrence of changes from baseline in physical examination, vital signs, and clinical safety laboratory values following administration of NTM-1634 to the final follow-up visit, and the occurrence of changes from baseline in ECG parameters after administration of NTM-1634 on day 1 (day of infusion). Immunogenicity was assessed by determining the presence of human anti-human antibodies.
Pharmacokinetics analyses.
Four immunoassays were developed to measure the concentrations of XCD-a, XCD-b, XCD-c, and XCD-d in serum samples. A bridging electrochemiluminescence (ECL) assay was used (22, 27, 34). Biotinylated (b) and ruthenylated (ru) BoNT/C domains were used in the assay as the capturing and detecting reagents, respectively. The assay uses the bivalent binding capability of the antibodies to form a bridging complex with biotinylated-domain and ruthenylated-domain to generate ECL signals for the measurement of the target antibody concentration in serum. Six assays were developed using the same format for each antibody assay. ECL signals generated from captured immune complexes formed when one arm of the MAb bound to a biotinylated domain and the other arm to the ruthenylated domain were detected by a Meso-Scale Discovery (MSD)SECTOR Imager 6000 and reported in ECL units. Calibration standards and quality control samples were prepared by spiking known amounts of each MAb into human serum. With the minimum required dilution of 1:10, the lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) was 10 ng/ml, with a quantifiable range of 10 to 2,000 ng/ml.
Immunogenicity assays were developed and validated to detect anti-XCD-a, XCD-b, XCD-c, and XCD-d antibodies in human serum. Bridging ECL assays used labeled MAbs for the capture and detection of antidrug antibodies (ADAs) in serum. A mixture of biotinylated and ruthenylated XCD-a, XCD-b, XCD-c, and XCD-d MAbs were incubated with human serum, and ECL signals were generated when one arm of an ADA bound to a b-MAb and the other arm bound to a ru-MAb. Samples that generated a signal above the screening cut point (SCP) were considered positive and confirmed with the use of a competitive assay in which the serum samples were incubated with and without nonlabeled MAbs. Samples with ECL signals above the confirmation cut point were considered positive and further analyzed for titers.
Statistical analyses.
Pharmacokinetics (PK) parameters for each of the four monoclonal antibodies of NTM-1634 (XCD-a, XCD-b, XCD-c, and XCD-d) were calculated from the serum concentration-time data using noncompartmental techniques (Phoenix-WinNonlin version 6.3.0; Pharsight Corporation, St. Louis, MO) and actual sampling times based on the start of the infusion. The following PK parameters were reported: area under the concentration time-curve (AUC) to the last concentration above the lower limit of quantitation (AUC0–t), maximum observed concentration (Cmax), time that Cmax was observed (Tmax), terminal elimination rate constant (λz), AUC from time zero extrapolated to infinity (AUC0–∞), terminal elimination half-life (t1/2), total clearance (CL), and volume of distribution (Vz). Summary of Tmax included the number of non-missing observations (n), median, minimum, and maximum values only. For all other PK parameters and concentrations, n, mean, standard deviation (SD), median, minimum, and maximum values are presented. In addition, geometric mean (GeoMean) and geometric coefficient of variation (GeoCV%) are presented for serum concentrations, Cmax, AUC0–t, AUC0–∞, t1/2, CL, and Vz.
The overall incidence of treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) (number and percentage of subjects) was summarized by dose cohort, and overall for categories of degree of severity, SAEs, causally related TEAEs, and SAEs by causality. The TEAEs were summarized and tabulated at both the subject (number [percentage] of subjects) and event (number of events) level for each dose cohort and overall. Treatment-emergent laboratory abnormalities by toxicity grades are summarized for each cohort and overall. Observed values and change from baseline of continuous ECG measurements (heart rate, QRS duration [milliseconds], PR interval [milliseconds], QT interval [milliseconds], and QTcF interval [milliseconds]) are summarized by cohort and overall. The overall ECG interpretation is summarized as “normal,” “abnormal, not clinically significant,” and “abnormal, clinically significant.”
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) under contract number HHSN27220160009C to XOMA Corp. (M.T.T.).
REFERENCES
- 1.Hatheway CL. 1995. Botulism: the present status of the disease. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 195:55–75. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-85173-5_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 1998. Botulism in the United States, 1899–1996. Handbook for epidemiologists, clinicians, and laboratory workers, CDC, Atlanta, GA. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Arnon SS, Schechter R, Inglesby TV, Henderson DA, Bartlett JG, Ascher MS, Eitzen E, Fine AD, Hauer J, Layton M, Lillibridge S, Osterholm MT, O'Toole T, Parker G, Perl TM, Russell PK, Swerdlow DL, Tonat K. 2001. Botulinum toxin as a biological weapon: medical and public health management. JAMA 285:1059–1070. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.8.1059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lacy DB, Stevens RC. 1999. Sequence homology and structural analysis of the clostridial neurotoxins. J Mol Biol 291:1091–1104. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.2945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Barash JR, Arnon SS. 2014. A novel strain of Clostridium botulinum that produces type B and type H botulinum toxins. J Infect Dis 209:183–191. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jit449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hill KK, Smith TJ. 2013. Genetic diversity within Clostridium botulinum serotypes, botulinum neurotoxin gene clusters and toxin subtypes, p 1–20. In Rummel A, Binz T (ed), Botulinum neurotoxins, vol 364 Springer, Hanover, Germany. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Webb RP, Smith TJ, Wright PM, Montgomery VA, Meagher MM, Smith LA. 2007. Protection with recombinant Clostridium botulinum C1 and D binding domain subunit (Hc) vaccines against C and D neurotoxins. Vaccine 25:4273–4282. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.02.081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Moriishi K, Koura M, Fujii N, Fujinaga Y, Inoue K, Syuto B, Oguma K. 1996. Molecular cloning of the gene encoding the mosaic neurotoxin, composed of parts of botulinum neurotoxin types C1 and D, and PCR detection of this gene from Clostridium botulinum type C organisms. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:662–667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Borland E, Moryson C, Smith G. 1977. Avian botulism and the high prevalence of Clostridium botulinum in the Norflok broads. Vet Rec 100:106–109. doi: 10.1136/vr.100.6.106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Takeda M, Tsukamoto K, Kohda T, Matsui M, Mukamoto M, Kozaki S. 2005. Characterization of the neurotoxin produced by isolates associated with avian botulism. Avian Dis 49:376–381. doi: 10.1637/7347-022305R1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Abbitt B, Murphy M, Ray A, Reagor J, Eugster A, Gayle L, Whitford H, Sutherland R, Fiske R, Pusok J. 1984. Catastrophic death losses in a dairy herd attributed to type D botulism. J Am Vet Med Assoc 185:798–801. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Relun A, Dorso L, Douart A, Chartier C, Guatteo R, Mazuet C, Popoff M, Assie S. 2017. A large outbreak of bovine botulism possibly linked to a massive contamination of grass silage by type D/C Clostridium botulinum spores on a farm with dairy and poultry operations. Epidemiol Infect 145:3477–3485. doi: 10.1017/S0950268817002382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Middlebrook JL, Franz DR. 1997. Botulinum toxins, p 643–654. In Zajtchuk R, Bellamy RF (ed), Medical aspects of chemical and biological warfare. Office of the Surgeon General, Department of the Army, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Oguma K, Yokota K, Hayashi S, Takeshi K, Kumagai M, Itoh N, Tachi N, Chiba S. 1990. Infant botulism due to Clostridium botulinum type C toxin. Lancet 336:1449–1450. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)93157-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Demarchi J, Mourgues C, Orio J, Prevot AR. 1958. Existence of type D botulism in man. Bull Acad Natl Med 142:580–582. (In French.) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Eleopra R, Tugnoli V, Quatrale R, Rossetto O, Montecucco C. 2004. Different types of botulinum toxin in humans. Mov Disord 19 Suppl 8:S53–S59. doi: 10.1002/mds.20010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Anonymous. 2017. 2017–2018 Public Health Emergency Medical Countermeasures Enterprise (PHEMCE) strategy and implementation plan. https://www.phe.gov/Preparedness/mcm/phemce/Documents/2017-phemce-sip.pdf.
- 18.Cangene Corp. 2013. BAT (botulism antitoxin heptavalent) (A, B, C, D, E, F, G) - (equine). Sterile solution for injection. https://www.fda.gov/downloads/.../UCM345147.pdf. Accessed 11 October 2017.
- 19.Fagan RP, Neil KP, Sasich R, Luquez C, Asaad H, Maslanka S, Khalil W. 2011. Initial recovery and rebound of type F intestinal colonization botulism after administration of investigational heptavalent botulinum antitoxin. Clin Infect Dis 53:e125. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Nowakowski A, Wang C, Powers DB, Amersdorfer P, Smith TJ, Montgomery VA, Sheridan R, Blake R, Smith LA, Marks JD. 2002. Potent neutralization of botulinum neurotoxin by recombinant oligoclonal antibody. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:11346–11350. doi: 10.1073/pnas.172229899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lou J, Wen W, Conrad F, Meng Q, Dong J, Sun Z, Garcia-Rodriguez C, Farr-Jones S, Cheng LW, Henderson TD, Brown JL, Smith TJ, Smith LA, Cormier A, Marks JD. 2018. A single tri-epitopic antibody virtually recapitulates the potency of a combination of three monoclonal antibodies in neutralization of botulinum neurotoxin serotype A. Toxins (Basel) 10:84. doi: 10.3390/toxins10020084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Meng Q, Li M, Silberg MA, Conrad F, Bettencourt J, To R, Huang C, Ma J, Meyer K, Shimizu R, Cao L, Tomic MT, Marks JD. 2012. Domain-based assays of individual antibody concentrations in an oligoclonal combination targeting a single protein. Anal Biochem 421:351–361. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2011.09.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Fan Y, Dong J, Lou J, Wen W, Conrad F, Geren IN, Garcia-Rodriguez C, Smith TJ, Smith LA, Ho M, Pires-Alves M, Wilson BA, Marks JD. 2015. Monoclonal antibodies that inhibit the proteolytic activity of botulinum neurotoxin serotype/B. Toxins (Basel) 7:3405–3423. doi: 10.3390/toxins7093405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Garcia-Rodriguez C, Razai A, Geren IN, Lou J, Conrad F, Wen WH, Farr-Jones S, Smith TJ, Brown JL, Skerry JC, Smith LA, Marks JD. 2018. A Three monoclonal antibody combination potently neutralizes multiple botulinum neurotoxin serotype E subtypes. Toxins (Basel) 10:105. doi: 10.3390/toxins10030105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Fan Y, Garcia-Rodriguez C, Lou J, Wen W, Conrad F, Zhai W, Smith TJ, Smith LA, Marks JD. 2017. A three monoclonal antibody combination potently neutralizes multiple botulinum neurotoxin serotype F subtypes. PLoS One 12:e0174187. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Fan Y, Barash JR, Lou J, Conrad F, Marks JD, Arnon SS. 2016. Immunological characterization and neutralizing ability of monoclonal antibodies directed against botulinum neurotoxin type H. J Infect Dis 213:1606–1614. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiv770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Nayak SU, Griffiss JM, McKenzie R, Fuchs EJ, Jurao RA, An AT, Ahene A, Tomic M, Hendrix CW, Zenilman JM. 2014. Safety and pharmacokinetics of XOMA 3AB, a novel mixture of three monoclonal antibodies against botulinum toxin A. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:5047–5053. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02830-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Anonymous. 1995. United Nations Security Council. Tenth report of the executive committee of the special commission established by the secretary-general pursuant to paragraph 9(b)(I) of security council resolution 687 (1991), and paragraph 3 of resolution 699 (1991) on the activities of the Special Commission. United Nations Security Council, New York, NY. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zilinskas RA. 1997. Iraq’s biological weapons: the past as future? Jama 278:418–424. doi: 10.1001/jama.1997.03550050080037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Arnon SS. 1993. Clinical trial of human botulism immune globulin, p 477–482. In DasGupta BR. (ed), Botulinum and tetanus neurotoxins: neurotransmission and biomedical aspects. Plenum Press, New York, NY. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Richardson JS, Parrera GS, Astacio H, Sahota H, Anderson DM, Hall C, Babinchak T. 15 June 2019. Safety and clinical outcomes of an equine-derived heptavalent botulinum antitoxin treatment for confirmed or suspected botulism in the United States. Clin Infect Dis doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wang D, Krilich J, Baudys J, Barr JR, Kalb SR. 2015. Enhanced detection of type C botulinum neurotoxin by the Endopep-MS assay through optimization of peptide substrates. Bioorg Med Chem 23:3667–3673. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2015.04.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kalb SR, Krilich JC, Dykes JK, Lúquez C, Maslanka SE, Barr JR. 2015. Detection of botulinum toxins A, B, E, and F in foods by Endopep-MS. J Agric Food Chem 63:1133–1141. doi: 10.1021/jf505482b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Meng Q, Garcia-Rodriguez C, Manzanarez G, Silberg MA, Conrad F, Bettencourt J, Pan X, Breece T, To R, Li M, Lee D, Thorner L, Tomic MT, Marks JD. 2012. Engineered domain-based assays to identify individual antibodies in oligoclonal combinations targeting the same protein. Anal Biochem 430:141–150. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2012.08.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]