Skip to main content
Biomicrofluidics logoLink to Biomicrofluidics
. 2019 Nov 26;13(6):069901. doi: 10.1063/1.5134802

Erratum: “Low frequency cyclical potentials for fine tuning insulator-based dielectrophoretic separations” [Biomicrofluidics 13, 044114 (2019)]

Cody J Lentz 1, Samuel Hidalgo-Caballero 1,2,1,2, Blanca H Lapizco-Encinas 1,a)
PMCID: PMC6879374  PMID: 31803339

In the publication “Low frequency cyclical potentials for fine tuning insulator-based dielectrophoretic separations,”1 Table I had the zeta potential, EK mobility, and DEP mobility for particle 1 listed under particle 2 and vice versa. A corrected table is shown below.

TABLE I.

List of particles used for this study with the associated particle properties. The particle zeta potential, EK mobility, and DEP mobility were found experimentally. Reported uncertainties for ζparticle and μEK are one standard deviation. Reported uncertainties for μDEP are based on the accuracy of the image based determination of trapping distance and the uncertainty of μEK.

No. Brand Color Diameter (μm) Surface functionalization ζparticle (mV) μEK (m2 V−1 s−1) μDEP (m4 V−2 s−1)
1 Magsphere Green 9.7 Carboxylated −19.1 ± 11 5.66 ± 0.20 × 10−8 −7.58 ± 0.031 × 10−18
2 Invitrogen Red 10 Carboxylated −60.9 ± 6 2.40 ± 0.30 × 10−8 −2.80 ± 0.40 × 10−18
3 Magsphere Green 2 Carboxylated −58.2 ± 15 2.61 ± 0.26 × 10−8 −1.70 ± 0.19 × 10−18
4 Magsphere Red 5.1 Carboxylated −48.3 ± 5 3.38 ± 0.35 × 10−8 −4.63 ± 0.56 × 10−18
5 Magsphere Red 5.1 Carboxylated 0.0 ± 8.1 7.58 ± 0.61 × 10−8 −5.93 ± 0.47 × 10−18
6 Magsphere Green 5.1 Nonfunctional −35.5 ± 7.6 4.81 ± 0.63 × 10−8 −3.14 ± 0.41 × 10−18

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support provided by the National Science Foundation (NSF) (No. CBET-1705895).

REFERENCES


Articles from Biomicrofluidics are provided here courtesy of American Institute of Physics

RESOURCES