Abstract
Sugars are essential for plant metabolism, growth and development. Plants must therefore manage their growth and developmental processes in response to sugar availability. Sugar signaling pathways constitute a complicated molecular network and are associated with global transcriptional regulation. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying sugar signaling remain largely unclear. This study reports that the protein basic-region leucine zipper 3 (bZIP3) is a novel sugar-responsive transcription factor in Arabidopsis plants. The expression of bZIP3 was rapidly repressed by sugar. Genetic analysis indicated that bZIP3 expression was modulated by the SNF1-RELATED KINASE 1 (SnRK1) pathway. Moreover, transgenic plants overexpressing bZIP3 and dominant repressor form bZIP3-SRDX showed aberrant shaped cotyledons with hyponastic bending. These findings suggest that bZIP3 plays a role in plant responses to sugars and is also associated with leaf development.
Keywords: Arabidopsis, leaf development, SnRK1, sugar signaling
Sugars play fundamental roles in plants, not only as metabolites but also as signaling molecules that modulate plant metabolism, growth, and development (Rolland et al. 2006; Smeekens et al. 2010). Thus, plants have evolved systems in which their growth and developmental processes are tightly controlled by cellular sugar availability (Eveland and Jackson 2012; León and Sheen 2003). HEXOKINASE1 (HXK1) is a glucose sensor, mediating photosynthetic and glucose-related regulation of transcription (Moore et al. 2003; Xiao et al. 2000). SNF1-RELATED KINASE 1 (SnRK1) and TARGET OF RAPAMYCIN (TOR) kinases function as master regulators of plant responses to cellular energy status associated with deprivation of nutrients, including sugars, thereby regulating growth and development (Li and Sheen 2016; Smeekens et al. 2010). SnRK1 acts at two different levels, modulating the activity of key metabolic enzymes and massively reprogramming transcription (Baena-González and Sheen 2008; Emanuelle et al. 2016). Transcription factors play crucial roles in many biological processes, including sugar signal transduction. The basic-region leucine zipper (bZIP) transcription factors contain a basic region that binds to DNA and a leucine zipper domain for dimerization. The Arabidopsis thaliana genome encompasses 75 genes for putative bZIP transcription factors, which can be subdivided into 10 groups (Jakoby et al. 2002). Groups C and S1 bZIP transcription factors have been reported to be partially responsible for transcriptional regulation in SnRK1-mediated signaling in response to low energy stress (Baena-González et al. 2007; Mair et al. 2015). The functions of some of these bZIPs, such as bZIP63 from group C and bZIP1/11 from group S1, are regulated transcriptionally and/or post-transcriptionally by sugar and energy status (Mair et al. 2015; Matiolli et al. 2011; Wiese et al. 2004). Nevertheless, the detailed mechanisms by which sugar signals mediate plant growth and development remain unclear. To understand these mechanisms, it is necessary to identify key transcription factors in sugar signaling and to determine their function. This study reports our identification of a novel sugar-responsive transcription factor bZIP3.
Arabidopsis thaliana ecotype Columbia-0 (Col-0) plants, designated wild type (WT), were grown on MS medium containing various sugar concentrations under long day growth conditions (16 h light/ 8 h dark) at 22°C after seeds were surface-sterilized and incubated for 2 days at 4°C in the dark. To generate transgenic plants overexpressing bZIP3, the full-length bZIP3 coding sequence in Col-0 cDNA was amplified using the primers listed in Supplementary Table S1. The amplified cDNA fragment was cloned into the pENTR/D-TOPO vector (Invitrogen, Massachusetts, USA) and transferred to pDEST_35S_HSPH binary vectors (Oshima et al. 2011), according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Invitrogen). The constructed vector was introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101 (pMP90) by electroporation, followed by Arabidopsis transformation using the floral dip method (Clough and Bent 1998). For gene expression analysis, total RNA was extracted from Arabidopsis seedlings as described (Aoyama et al. 2017), followed by quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) using SYBR premix EX Taq (TaKaRa) and gene-specific primers (Supplementary Table S1), with Mx3000P (Agilent Technologies, California, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
To explore novel transcription factors mediating sugar signaling, the transcriptome profile of Arabidopsis transcription factors was searched with Genevestigator, an available microarray database (https://www.genevestigator.com). The bZIP3 (At5g15830) gene was identified as a candidate sugar-responsive transcription factor in Arabidopsis. According to the database, bZIP3 expression was down-regulated by glucose treatment. Sugar-responsive bZIP3 expression was assessed by qRT-PCR analysis. Briefly, WT Arabidopsis seedlings were grown for 8 days on the sugar-free medium and then transiently treated with 0 mM or 200 mM glucose at 0 h after light on (Zeitgeber time 0). Seedlings were collected at 1 h, 4 h, 8 h, and 24 h after treatment, and their total RNA was extracted for qRT-PCR analysis. bZIP3 expression showed a diurnal pattern, with a significant reduction at 1 h after treatment with glucose (Figure 1A). The level of expression of bZIP3 was also reduced by sucrose and fructose and, to a lesser extent, by osmotic stress treatment with mannitol (Figure 1B), confirming that bZIP3 expression is regulated by sugar availability. RT-PCR analysis of the tissue-specific expression pattern of bZIP3 showed that bZIP3 is broadly expressed in all plant tissues, especially in older leaves and roots (Figure 2).
Figure 1. Sugar effect on bZIP3 expression. (A) Expression of bZIP3 in response to glucose over time, calculated as relative to bZIP3 expression level in the sample collected at Zeitgeber time 0 without glucose treatment and normalized to IPP2 levels. Results are reported as means±SD (n=4), and significant differences between samples incubated in the presence and absence of glucose were determined at each point by Student’s t-tests (* p<0.05, ** p<0.01). (B) Expression of bZIP3 in response to various sugars. Seedlings were incubated with 200 mM glucose, sucrose, fructose or mannitol for 1 h and bZIP3 expression was assayed by qRT-PCR. Levels of expression were calculated relative to that of untreated seedlings. Results are reported as means±SD (n=3). Letters indicate significant differences (p<0.05), as determined by one-way ANOVA with Turkey’s post hoc test.
Figure 2. Semi-quantitative RT-PCR analysis of bZIP3 gene expression in tissues of 5-week-old WT Arabidopsis plants. 18S rRNA was used as an internal control.
To understand the upstream regulation of sugar-responsive bZIP3 expression, we assessed the involvement of the SnRK1 signaling pathway. Because complete loss-of-function mutants of SnRK1 exhibit embryonic lethality (Baena-González et al. 2007), we generated an inducible RNAi knockdown mutant of SnRK1α1 in the background of a SnRK1α2 knockout mutant (WiscDsLox320B03) (snrk1α1i/1α2) utilizing the pOpOff2 system (Wielopolska et al. 2005). WT seedlings and two independent snrk1α1i/1α2 lines (#2 and #3) were grown for 7 days on sugar-free medium, in the presence or absence of dexamethasone (DEX). RT-PCR analysis showed that expression of bZIP3 and DORMANCY ASSOCIATED GENE 2 (DRM2), a target marker gene of SnRK1 (Baena-González et al. 2007), in the snrk1α1i/1α2 mutant were dramatically repressed in the presence of DEX (Figure 3), suggesting that sugar-responsive bZIP3 expression is mediated via SnRK1.
Figure 3. bZIP3 expression level in snrk1α mutants. WT and two lines (#2 and #3) of snrk1α1i/1α2 seedlings were grown for 7 days on sugar-free half MS medium. Total RNA was isolated and bZIP3 expression analyzed by RT-PCR. ACT7 was used as a reference gene for the expression of all genes assayed and DRM2 was used as a marker for SnRK1 function.
To clarify the physiological function of bZIP3 in plants, we investigated the phenotypes of loss-of-function mutant and transgenic plants overexpressing bZIP3 under the control of the CaMV 35S promoter (bZIP3 OX). A null mutant line of bZIP3 (bzip3-1, SAIL_261_F01) was identified in a T-DNA insertion population provided by the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center (Figure 4A). bZIP3 OX lines were generated using the pDEST_35S_HSPH binary vector (Oshima et al. 2011) (Figure 4B). WT, bzip3-1 and bZIP3 OX seedlings were grown for 7 days on MS medium containing 1% sucrose. bZIP3 OX showed abnormal cotyledons with hyponastic bending and uneven surfaces (Figure 4D). In contrast, these characteristics were not observed in bzip3-1 and WT cotyledons, both of which exhibited epinasty (Figure 4D). Because some single knock-out mutants of a transcription factor do not exhibit markedly different phenotypes because of genetic redundancy, we also generated transgenic plants expressing bZIP3 fused with the Superman repression domain X (SRDX) (bZIP3-SRDX), a fusion that converts a transcription factor to a strong repressor dominantly suppressing the target genes (Hiratsu et al. 2003). bZIP3-SRDX transgenic lines were created using a pDEST_35S_SRDX_HSPH binary vector (Oshima et al. 2011), and the expression of bZIP3-SRDX was confirmed by qRT-PCR analysis (Figure 4C). The bZIP3-SRDX seedlings had abnormally shaped cotyledons, similar to those of the bZIP3 OX seedlings (Figure 4D). It should be examined whether bZIP3 functions as transcriptional repressor because both of the bZIP3 OX and bZIP3-SRDX exhibited hyponastic bending of cotyledons. Leaf shape is determined by various factors at several stages of development, including leaf initiation, outgrowth, expansion, and maturation (Moon and Hake 2011; Sinha 1999). After leaf initiation, the polarity at three axes, the proximal/distal, adaxial/abaxial and medial/lateral axes, contribute to the shaping of the leaf (Moon and Hake 2011; Sinha 1999). Although little has been reported on the relationship between sugars and leaf morphogenesis, some mutants have aberrant cotyledons, similar to bZIP3 OX and bZIP3-SRDX seedlings. A loss of function mutant of UDP-L-RHAMNOSE SYNTHASE (RHM1), called rol1-2, showed hyponastic growth and aberrant pavement cells in cotyledons (Ringli et al. 2008). These phenotypes were caused by an alteration in the flavonol conjugation profile through auxin-induced or auxin-independent processes in Arabidopsis (Ringli et al. 2008). Rhamnose is an important component of pectin, and rol1 mutants exhibited a modification in pectin structure (Diet et al. 2006). Recently, bZIP3 was identified as a gene that could putatively increase enzymatic saccharification efficiency (Ohtani et al. 2017), suggesting that bZIP3 is involved in altering secondary cell wall properties. In contrast, a previous study (Matiolli et al. 2011) suggested that the sugar-responsive bZIP3 expression pattern is similar to that of bZIP63, which mediates energy starvation signaling to modulate central metabolism and leaf senescence (Mair et al. 2015). Further investigations of bZIP3 function may provide new insights into the interplay between sugar signaling and plant development, including the regulation of leaf shape.
Figure 4. Shape of cotyledons in bZIP3 OX and bZIP3-SRDX plants. (A) Gene structure of bZIP3 and the location of the T-DNA insertion in the bzip3-1 mutant. The positions of the primers used for RT-PCR are indicated by arrowheads. (B) and (C) qRT-PCR analysis of bZIP3 OX and bZIP3-SRDX plants. Total RNA was extracted from seedlings of indicated plants grown on MS medium. 18S rRNA was used as an internal control for RT-PCR and qRT-PCR analyses. Relative expression levels were compared with that of WT seedlings. Results are reported as means±SD (n=3). (D) Seedlings of WT, bzip3-1, bZIP3 OX and bZIP3-SRDX grown for 7 days on MS medium containing 1% sucrose. The photographs show the top (upper panels) and side (lower panels) views of each cotyledon. Bars=1 mm.
Supplementary Data
References
- Aoyama S, Terada S, Sanagi M, Hasegawa Y, Lu Y, Morita Y, Chiba Y, Sato T, Yamaguchi J (2017) Membrane-localized ubiquitin ligase ATL15 functions in sugar-responsive growth regulation in Arabidopsis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 491: 33–39 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baena-González E, Rolland F, Thevelein JM, Sheen J (2007) A central integrator of transcription networks in plant stress and energy signalling. Nature 448: 938–942 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baena-González E, Sheen J (2008) Convergent energy and stress signaling. Trends Plant Sci 13: 474–482 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clough SJ, Bent AF (1998) Floral dip: A simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 16: 735–743 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Diet A, Link B, Seifert GJ, Schellenberg B, Wagner U, Pauly M, Reiter WD, Ringli C (2006) The Arabidopsis root hair cell wall formation mutant lrx1 is suppressed by mutations in the RHM1 gene encoding a UDP-L-rhamnose synthase. Plant Cell 18: 1630–1641 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Emanuelle S, Doblin MS, Stapleton DI, Bacic A, Gooley PR (2016) Molecular insights into the enigmatic metabolic regulator, SnRK1. Trends Plant Sci 21: 341–353 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eveland AL, Jackson DP (2012) Sugars, signalling, and plant development. J Exp Bot 63: 3367–3377 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hiratsu K, Matsui K, Koyama T, Ohme-Takagi M (2003) Dominant repression of target genes by chimeric repressors that include the EAR motif, a repression domain, in Arabidopsis. Plant J 34: 733–739 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jakoby M, Weisshaar B, Dröge-Laser W, Vicente-Carbajosa J, Tiedemann J, Kroj T, Parcy F (2002) bZIP transcription factors in Arabidopsis. Trends Plant Sci 7: 106–111 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- León P, Sheen J (2003) Sugar and hormone connections. Trends Plant Sci 8: 110–116 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li L, Sheen J (2016) Dynamic and diverse sugar signaling. Curr Opin Plant Biol 33: 116–125 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mair A, Pedrotti L, Wurzinger B, Anrather D, Simeunovic A, Weiste C, Valerio C, Dietrich K, Kirchler T, Nägele T, et al. (2015) SnRK1-triggered switch of bZIP63 dimerization mediates the low-energy response in plants. eLife 4: e05828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Matiolli CC, Tomaz JP, Duarte GT, Prado FM, Del Bem LE, Silveira AB, Gauer L, Corrêa LG, Drumond RD, Viana AJ, et al. (2011) The Arabidopsis bZIP gene AtbZIP63 is a sensitive integrator of transient abscisic acid and glucose signals. Plant Physiol 157: 692–705 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moon J, Hake S (2011) How a leaf gets its shape. Curr Opin Plant Biol 14: 24–30 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moore B, Zhou L, Rolland F, Hall Q, Cheng WH, Liu YX, Hwang I, Jones T, Sheen J (2003) Role of the Arabidopsis glucose sensor HXK1 in nutrient, light, and hormonal signaling. Science 300: 332–336 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ohtani M, Ramachandran V, Tokumoto T, Takebayashi A, Ihara A, Matsumoto T, Hiroyama R, Nishikubo N, Demura T (2017) Identification of novel factors that increase enzymatic saccharification efficiency in Arabidopsis wood cells. Plant Biotechnol 34: 203–206 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oshima Y, Mitsuda N, Nakata M, Nakagawa T, Nagaya S, Kato K, Ohme-Takagi M (2011) Novel vector systems to accelerate functional analysis of transcription factors using chimeric repressor gene-silencing technology (CRES-T). Plant Biotechnol 28: 201–210 [Google Scholar]
- Ringli C, Bigler L, Kuhn BM, Leiber RM, Diet A, Santelia D, Frey B, Pollmann S, Klein M (2008) The modified flavonol glycosylation profile in the Arabidopsis rol1 mutants results in alterations in plant growth and cell shape formation. Plant Cell 20: 1470–1481 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rolland F, Baena-González E, Sheen J (2006) Sugar sensing and signaling in plants: Conserved and novel mechanisms. Annu Rev Plant Biol 57: 675–709 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sinha N (1999) Leaf development in angiosperms. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 50: 419–446 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smeekens S, Ma J, Hanson J, Rolland F (2010) Sugar signals and molecular networks controlling plant growth. Curr Opin Plant Biol 13: 274–279 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wielopolska A, Townley H, Moore I, Waterhouse P, Helliwell C (2005) A high-throughput inducible RNAi vector for plants. Plant Biotechnol J 3: 583–590 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wiese A, Elzinga N, Wobbes B, Smeekens S (2004) A conserved upstream open reading frame mediates sucrose-induced repression of translation. Plant Cell 16: 1717–1729 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xiao W, Sheen J, Jang JC (2000) The role of hexokinase in plant sugar signal transduction and growth and development. Plant Mol Biol 44: 451–461 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.




