Current understanding of flagellum biogenesis during the cell cycle in trypanosomatids is limited to a few pathogenic species, including Trypanosoma brucei, Trypanosoma cruzi, and Leishmania spp. The most notable characteristics of trypanosomatid flagella studied so far are the extreme stability and lack of ciliary disassembly/absorption during the cell cycle. This is different from cilia in Chlamydomonas and mammalian cells, which undergo complete absorption prior to cell cycle initiation. In this study, we examined flagellum duplication during the cell cycle of Leptomonas pyrrhocoris. With the shortest duplication time documented for all Trypanosomatidae and its amenability to culture on agarose gel with limited mobility, we were able to image these cells through the cell cycle. Rapid, cell cycle-specific flagellum disassembly different from turnover was observed for the first time in trypanosomatids. Given the observed length-dependent growth rate and the presence of different disassembly mechanisms, we proposed a min-max model that can account for the flagellar length variation observed in L. pyrrhocoris.
Keywords: flagellar length regulation, Leptomonas pyrrhocoris, trypanosomatids, flagellum disassembly, flagellar length regulation
ABSTRACT
Current understanding of flagellum/cilium length regulation focuses on a few model organisms with flagella of uniform length. Leptomonas pyrrhocoris is a monoxenous trypanosomatid parasite of firebugs. When cultivated in vitro, L. pyrrhocoris duplicates every 4.2 ± 0.2 h, representing the shortest doubling time reported for trypanosomatids so far. Each L. pyrrhocoris cell starts its cell cycle with a single flagellum. A new flagellum is assembled de novo, while the old flagellum persists throughout the cell cycle. The flagella in an asynchronous L. pyrrhocoris population exhibited a vast length variation of ∼3 to 24 μm, casting doubt on the presence of a length regulation mechanism based on a single balance point between the assembly and disassembly rate in these cells. Through imaging of live L. pyrrhocoris cells, a rapid, partial disassembly of the existing, old flagellum is observed upon, if not prior to, the initial assembly of a new flagellum. Mathematical modeling demonstrated an inverse correlation between the flagellar growth rate and flagellar length and inferred the presence of distinct, cell cycle-dependent disassembly mechanisms with different rates. On the basis of these observations, we proposed a min-max model that could account for the vast flagellar length range observed for asynchronous L. pyrrhocoris. This model may also apply to other flagellated organisms with flagellar length variation.
OBSERVATION
Recent comparative genomic analyses of Leptomonas pyrrhocoris, a monoxenous parasite (one host in the life cycle), provide profound insights into the evolution of parasitism, particularly compared to closely related dixenous (two hosts in the life cycle) Leishmania spp. (1). The presence of a full set of genes responsible for RNA interference also makes L. pyrrhocoris a promising model for functional studies. In this study, we examined flagellum duplication during the L. pyrrhocoris cell cycle, considering its importance in trypanosomatid physiology and pathogenesis (2).
L. pyrrhocoris proliferated robustly in Schneider Drosophila medium. The cells replicated every 4.2 ± 0.2 h, with exponential growth observed over a range of 2 × 104 to 2 × 107 cells/ml (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). The L. pyrrhocoris cell cycle is the shortest reported for trypanosomatids that we are aware of, compared to 8 to 10 h for Trypanosoma brucei, ∼7 h for Leishmania mexicana, ∼10 h for Leishmania major, ∼12 h for Trypanosoma lewisi, ∼25 h for Trypanosoma cruzi, and ∼7 h for Crithidia fasciculata. Of note, the vast majority of monoxenous species have not been investigated in this regard (3).
To analyze the flagellum, L. pyrrhocoris cells were labeled with antibodies against PFR2, which is a highly conserved component of the paraflagellar rod (PFR) present along the trypanosomatid axoneme (4), and anti-α-tubulin antibodies that mark the axoneme microtubules (Fig. 1A). The PFR in T. brucei is found along the axoneme, ending at the same distal point as the axoneme microtubules. In L. pyrrhocoris, however, a gap between the PFR and axoneme tip was consistently observed. Similar observations were also made with antibodies against PFR1, another conserved PFR component (Fig. S2). In trypanosomes, the PFR has been proposed to act as a structural framework to mediate flagellar signaling events (5) and regulate axonemal waveform (6, 7). The absence of PFR at the distal tip of L. pyrrhocoris flagella implies a different signaling mechanism or motility modulation at the flagellar tip in this parasite.
In addition to the flagellar axoneme, the anti-α-tubulin antibodies also label the subpellicular microtubules that demarcate the trypanosomatid cell bodies. L. pyrrhocoris cells with a single flagellum are mostly rod shaped, but replicating cells with two flagella are more rounded (Fig. 1A), similar to the previously reported cases of L. mexicana and L. major (8, 9). Such morphological remodeling of the mother cell was not observed during the T. brucei cell cycle. When L. pyrrhocoris was stained with YL1/2, a monoclonal antibody directed against tyrosinated tubulin in newly synthesized microtubules (10), increased staining was observed in replicating cells (Fig. S3), suggesting increased subpellicular microtubule turnover in cells that were producing a new flagellum.
Flagellar length (marked by anti-PFR2) was measured in a log-phase, asynchronous population of L. pyrrhocoris cells. A total of 762 cells were measured, with 604 cells containing a single flagellum and 158 cells with duplicating flagella (Fig. 1B). Similar to L. mexicana, but unlike T. brucei, L. pyrrhocoris displayed a vast variation in flagellar length. In cells containing a single flagellum, the flagellar length varied between 3 and 24 μm, with ∼10% of the flagella longer than 15 μm and ∼35% longer than 10 μm. Length variation (3 to 17 μm) was also observed for the longer, old flagellum in replicating cells. However, only 1.3% of the old flagella were longer than 15 μm and 21.5% were longer than 10 μm. This length variation is consistent with continuous flagellum growth after cell division, as has been previously reported for T. brucei and L. mexicana (8, 11). It also raises an intriguing possibility that the existing old L. pyrrhocoris flagellum undergoes partial disassembly at the time of new flagellum biogenesis. Flagellum disassembly/absorption is well documented in green algae and mammalian cells, where complete disassembly occurs prior to cell division (12, 13). In trypanosomatids, flagellar disassembly has been observed during the differentiation (14, 15), but not during the cell cycle (16).
To visualize flagellum length dynamics during the cell cycle, partially immobilized L. pyrrhocoris cells were imaged every 1 min for ∼4 h (see Text S1 in the supplemental material). Flagellar length was measured in five cells that underwent flagellum duplication and cell division during the imaging time (Fig. 2; see also Fig. S4 and Movie S1 in the supplemental material). In all cells, shortening of the old flagellum was observed prior to the emergence of a new flagellum protruding from the cell body. As the new flagellum was assembled, the old flagellum continued to shorten until cell division began. Flagellar shortening ended, and old flagellum resumed growth only after cell division was completed. Best-fit models of the disassembly process in the old flagellum and the growth phase in the new flagellum were generated separately using linear regression (Fig. 2B; Text S1).
The flagellar disassembly rate was found to be highly constant throughout the shortening phase in different L. pyrrhocoris cells at ∼0.089 μm/min (R2 = 100%, root mean square error [RMSE] = 0). This rate is lower than the absorption rate of 0.31 ± 0.07 μm/min reported for Chlamydomonas flagella (17), but nearly 20 times higher than a turnover rate at ∼0.28 μm/h (i.e., ∼0.0047 μm/min) predicted by previous modeling of L. mexicana (8). L. pyrrhocoris flagella grew at various rates following an inverse relationship to flagellar length, which can be described as follows: dL/dT = A − BL, where dL/dT is the rate of net growth, and L is flagellar length. By averaging the best-fit models from four of the five cells (one was discarded due to poor R2 value), we found constant A = 0.108 μm/min, which represents the theoretical maximum growth rate when L = 0, and the flagellum assembly rate constant B = 0.004/min.
Eukaryotic flagellar length regulation has been best studied in cells with relatively fixed flagellar length. As flagellar components are constantly added and removed at the distal tip, flagellar length is the balanced result of both assembly and disassembly processes. In Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, flagellum disassembly has been found to be constant and length independent. Assembly, however, is inversely proportional to length (Fig. 2C). At the balance point, where the assembly rate equals the disassembly rate, an equilibrium flagellar length (Leq) is achieved. How flagellar growth rate decreases over length is not fully understood, and several different mechanisms have been proposed to explain this phenomenon (17–20). In T. brucei, mature flagellum is highly stable. A grow-and-lock model posits that a lock mechanism takes effect around the time of cell division, preventing the newly synthesized flagellum from further growth or shortening (16).
However, not all flagellated organisms have flagella of uniform length. Flagellar length variation in L. mexicana was explained as a result of continuous elongation throughout several cell cycles. Flagellar turnover was also predicted by previous modeling of L. mexicana (8). However, flagellum shortening was not directly observed in live-cell imaging of L. mexicana, likely due to its long(er) cell cycle. In L. pyrrhocoris, the old flagellum disassembled at a constant rate of ∼0.089 μm/min at the time of new flagellum synthesis. For the new flagella, an inverse correlation was found between the assembly rate and flagellar length. Combining these two observations, we would expect a balance point with a flagellar length of ∼4μm (Fig. 2C), correlating with the shortest length measured for L. pyrrhocoris flagella (Fig. 1B). On the other hand, the longest flagellar length observed was ∼24 μm, corresponding to a disassembly rate of ∼0.012 μm/min that is ∼7 times lower than the observed ∼0.089 μm/min disassembly rate. To unify these observations, we proposed that L. pyrrhocoris has two distinct disassembly mechanisms, one at ∼0.089 μm/min that initiates around the time of new flagellum synthesis and ends at cytokinesis, and the other one at ∼0.012 μm/min and is a constitutive, cell cycle-independent turnover rate.
The observed length-dependent growth rate, together with the presence of two distinct disassembly processes, predict two possible balance points that correspond to the maximum and the minimum length a flagellum can achieve. We term this a min-max model (Fig. 2C). Rapid shortening of the old flagellum occurs during new flagellum biogenesis. After cell division, the disassembly rate decreases to the turnover rate, allowing both the old flagellum and the newly assembled flagellum to continue to grow in their respective daughter cells (e.g., cell 3 in Movie S1 and Fig. S4), and some reach maximum length before the initiation of the next cell cycle.
The min-max model could explain flagellar length variation in L. pyrrhocoris and perhaps also other organisms. Disassembly mechanisms involving evolutionarily conserved molecules and pathways have been reported (21–23). Homologs to key molecules, such as kinesin 13, have also been found in the L. pyrrhocoris genome. With further development of molecular genetic tools, the fast-replicating L. pyrrhocoris would be a useful model to understand flagellar length regulation in organisms containing flagella of variable lengths. It is generally accepted that flagellum length is important for its functions (24). Whether shortening of the old flagellum is required for new flagellum assembly calls for further understanding of the expression and regulation of flagellar components in L. pyrrhocoris. How swimming behavior of L. pyrrhocoris cells might be affected by different flagellar lengths and how the cells cope with such differences during the cell cycle also remain to be investigated.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are grateful to members of the He and Yurchenko groups for critical reading of this paper.
This work was funded by Singapore Ministry of Education Tier 2 research grant (R-154-000-B04-112) to C.Y.H. and by ERD Funds project (OPVVV 16_019/0000759) and Russian Science Foundation (19-15-00054, growth of Leptomonas pyrrhocoris) to V.Y. A.S. is a recipient of the Amgen Research Scholarship.
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Footnotes
Citation He CY, Singh A, Yurchenko V. 2019. Cell cycle-dependent flagellar disassembly in a firebug trypanosomatid Leptomonas pyrrhocoris. mBio 10:e02424-19. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.02424-19.
REFERENCES
- 1.Flegontov P, Butenko A, Firsov S, Kraeva N, Eliáš M, Field MC, Filatov D, Flegontova O, Gerasimov ES, Hlaváčová J, Ishemgulova A, Jackson AP, Kelly S, Kostygov AY, Logacheva MD, Maslov DA, Opperdoes FR, O’Reilly A, Sádlová J, Ševčíková T, Venkatesh D, Vlček Č, Volf P, Votýpka J, Záhonová K, Yurchenko V, Lukeš J. 2016. Genome of Leptomonas pyrrhocoris: a high-quality reference for monoxenous trypanosomatids and new insights into evolution of Leishmania. Sci Rep 6:23704. doi: 10.1038/srep23704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Maslov DA, Opperdoes FR, Kostygov AY, Hashimi H, Lukeš J, Yurchenko V. 2019. Recent advances in trypanosomatid research: genome organization, expression, metabolism, taxonomy and evolution. Parasitology 146:1–27. doi: 10.1017/S0031182018000951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lukeš J, Butenko A, Hashimi H, Maslov DA, Votýpka J, Yurchenko V. 2018. Trypanosomatids are much more than just trypanosomes: clues from the expanded family tree. Trends Parasitol 34:466–480. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2018.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Maharana BR, Tewari AK, Singh V. 2015. An overview on kinetoplastid paraflagellar rod. J Parasit Dis 39:589–595. doi: 10.1007/s12639-014-0422-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Portman N, Gull K. 2010. The paraflagellar rod of kinetoplastid parasites: from structure to components and function. Int J Parasitol 40:135–148. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2009.10.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Koyfman AY, Schmid MF, Gheiratmand L, Fu CJ, Khant HA, Huang D, He CY, Chiu W. 2011. Structure of Trypanosoma brucei flagellum accounts for its bihelical motion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:11105–11108. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1103634108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hughes LC, Ralston KS, Hill KL, Zhou ZH. 2012. Three-dimensional structure of the trypanosome flagellum suggests that the paraflagellar rod functions as a biomechanical spring. PLoS One 7:e25700. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wheeler RJ, Gluenz E, Gull K. 2011. The cell cycle of Leishmania: morphogenetic events and their implications for parasite biology. Mol Microbiol 79:647–662. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07479.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ambit A, Woods KL, Cull B, Coombs GH, Mottram JC. 2011. Morphological events during the cell cycle of Leishmania major. Eukaryot Cell 10:1429–1438. doi: 10.1128/EC.05118-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sherwin T, Gull K. 1989. Visualization of detyrosination along single microtubules reveals novel mechanisms of assembly during cytoskeletal duplication in trypanosomes. Cell 57:211–221. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90959-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Farr H, Gull K. 2009. Functional studies of an evolutionarily conserved, cytochrome b5 domain protein reveal a specific role in axonemal organisation and the general phenomenon of post-division axonemal growth in trypanosomes. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 66:24–35. doi: 10.1002/cm.20322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Plotnikova OV, Pugacheva EN, Golemis EA. 2009. Primary cilia and the cell cycle. Methods Cell Biol 94:137–160. doi: 10.1016/S0091-679X(08)94007-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rieder CL, Jensen CG, Jensen L. 1979. Resorption of primary cilia during mitosis in a vertebrate (Ptk1) cell line. J Ultrastruct Res 68:173–185. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(79)90152-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Peacock L, Kay C, Bailey M, Gibson W. 2018. Shape-shifting trypanosomes: flagellar shortening followed by asymmetric division in Trypanosoma congolense from the tse-tse proventriculus. PLoS Pathog 14:e1007043. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wiese M, Kuhn D, Grünfelder CG. 2003. Protein kinase involved in flagellar-length control. Eukaryot Cell 2:769–777. doi: 10.1128/ec.2.4.769-777.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bertiaux E, Morga B, Blisnick T, Rotureau B, Bastin P. 2018. A grow-and-lock model for the control of flagellum length in trypanosomes. Curr Biol 28:3802–3814. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.10.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Marshall WF, Qin HM, Brenni MR, Rosenbaum JL. 2005. Flagellar length control system: testing a simple model based on intraflagellar transport and turnover. Mol Biol Cell 16:270–278. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e04-07-0586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wilson NF, Iyer JK, Buchheim JA, Meek W. 2008. Regulation of flagellar length in Chlamydomonas. Semin Cell Dev Biol 19:494–501. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2008.07.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Goehring NW, Hyman AA. 2012. Organelle growth control through limiting pools of cytoplasmic components. Curr Biol 22:R330–R339. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.03.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Craft JM, Harris JA, Hyman S, Kner P, Lechtreck KF. 2015. Tubulin transport by IFT is upregulated during ciliary growth by a cilium-autonomous mechanism. J Cell Biol 208:223–237. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201409036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sanchez I, Dynlacht BD. 2016. Cilium assembly and disassembly. Nat Cell Biol 18:711–717. doi: 10.1038/ncb3370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.McInally SG, Kondev J, Dawson SC. 2019. Length-dependent disassembly maintains four different flagellar lengths in Giardia. BioRxiv doi: 10.1101/647115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 23.Wang Q, Peng Z, Long H, Deng X, Huang K. 2019. Polyubiquitylation of alpha-tubulin at K304 is required for flagellar disassembly in Chlamydomonas. J Cell Sci 132:jcs229047. doi: 10.1242/jcs.229047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ishikawa H, Marshall WF. 2011. Ciliogenesis: building the cell’s antenna. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 12:222–234. doi: 10.1038/nrm3085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.