Abstract
Introduction:
Reproductive health of women is of special concern, especially during their reproductive years where the reproductive morbidity is very high, especially in countries like India.
Aims:
This study was carried out to find the reproductive health status of rural married women and identify those suffering from reproductive morbidity to provide appropriate guidance and treatment.
Methodology:
This community-based cross-sectional descriptive study was carried among rural married women above 18 years of age in the field practice areas of a medical college. By simple random sampling method, the required sample size of 650 was identified. Data collected by female investigators using a pretested structured questionnaire was analyzed using SPSS version 22.
Results:
Most of the study participants were in the age group of 21–40 years. About 32% of married women delivered by cesarean section and exclusive breastfeeding was followed by 88.9% of the mothers. Around 78% of the participants used contraceptive methods and the major reason given was for economic reasons (48%). About 67% of study participants suffered from one or more gynecological problems such as menorrhagia, lower abdominal pain, dysmenorrhea, and abnormal vaginal discharge. UTI (14%) and RTI (11.6%) were the most commonly diagnosed gynecological morbidity. Pallor was present in 45.5% of the study participants and 6.9% had clinical goiter.
Conclusion:
High prevalence of gynecological morbidity in this study shows that there is a dire need to plan and implement health education and awareness creation programs to complement the existing programs targeting women.
Keywords: Contraceptive morbidity, gynecological morbidity, obstetrical morbidity
Introduction
Reproductive health is a state of complete physical, mental, and social well-being, and not merely the absence of reproductive disease or infirmity. Reproductive health is one of the crucial components of general health and well-being and one among the central features of human development. Reproductive health is most important for women, especially during their reproductive years as most of their reproductive health problems arise during that period. Women form an equal proportion of the population and they have their own social and medical problems.[1]
The morbidity and the mortality profile of the women in any country are specific to their sociodemographic and other environmental-related conditions.[1] The morbidity problems of the women are basically complicated because they have to bear the gynecological as well as obstetrical problems apart from the other health-related issues. The general health and well-being of a woman greatly depends on a healthy reproductive life. The leading cause of ill health in women of reproductive age group worldwide can be attributed to reproductive health problems, especially to those in the developing countries.[1,2]
Any morbidity or dysfunction of the reproductive tract or any morbidity which is a consequence of reproductive behavior including pregnancy, abortion, and childbirth or sexual behaviors are included as part of reproductive morbidity. Reproductive morbidity can be broadly classified into three categories: obstetrical, gynecological, and contraceptive morbidity. Obstetric morbidity refers to any ill health in relation to pregnancy and childbirth.[3] Gynecological morbidity is the disorders of the genital tract, which are not directly related to pregnancy, delivery, and puerperium.[4] Contraceptive morbidity refers to morbidity caused by use of specific contraceptives. Quantifying all of these morbidities as a whole will give us the overall reproductive health status of women.
Studies conducted in various parts of the World during the past few years have shown that the reproductive morbidities including menstrual, obstetrics, and gynecological morbidities vary widely from 40% to 80%. Studies conducted in India showed that the percentage of women complaining on gynecological problems varied from 35% to 58.9%.[5,6] These reports just touch the tip of the iceberg and much need to be done to screen and assess the reproductive health status of women.
The health-seeking behavior of women in our country is to be blamed for this high prevalence of reproductive morbidity because the health care of the women is the last priority among the family members. Community-based assessment of reproductive health status including the various gynecological morbidities will serve as an important tool for epidemiological surveillance, health service planning, and policy advocacy.[7]
One of the basic components of primary health care in India was maternal and child health care service.[8] The Reproductive and Child Health [RCH] Program was launched by the Govt. of India in 1997, which concentrated on reducing the fertility and maternal mortality and morbidity rates, but failed to understand that the women's health is also affected by problems that are not related to pregnancy or childbirth. This contributed to a marked difference in the prevalence of reported reproductive morbidity from 24.4% to 74.1% at various regions of India.[9]
Women seeks medical care and intervention when the problem they suffer becomes too much to tolerate and often when in the advanced stages of the disease or illness. They also tend to hide the reproductive system-related problems because of the highly sensitive nature and are hesitant to share with their own family members. There are very few published studies on prevalence of reproductive/gynecological morbidities among the women, especially in the study area, and their health-seeking behavior is not documented because the women suffer these morbidities silently without seeking proper institutional care for early diagnosis and treatment.
Objectives of the study
With this background, this study was planned and conducted with the following objectives:
To study the reproductive health status of rural married women in Kancheepuram district of Tamil Nadu.
To perform a detailed assessment of those identified to be suffering from reproductive morbidity and quantify them in order to provide appropriate guidance and treatment for those affected.
Methodology
Study design
This is a community-based cross-sectional descriptive study.
Study area and population
This study was conducted in the rural field practice areas of a Medical College and Hospital in Kancheepuram district, Tamil Nadu. The field practice areas are located partly in Sripuram and Padappai areas. Out of the total population of 58,235, women comprises of about 48.92%.
Sample size and sampling technique
Based on the study conducted by Mathew et al. in 2017 in a rural area of Karnataka,[10] the prevalence of gynecological morbidity was found to be 66.4%, the sample size was calculated by applying the formula 4pq/d2 with precision of 6% at 95% confidence interval. The sample size calculated was 563. Adding 10% for non-response, the total sample was found out to be 619, which was rounded off to 650. Married women in the age group of 18 years and above formed the study population.
Details of women above 18 years of age in the respective study areas were obtained from the website of Chief electoral officer, Tamil Nadu. From each study area, a list was prepared with the names of women arranged in alphabetical order. By simple random sampling, 325 women were chosen randomly from each of the study area to obtain the required sample size of 650.
Study tool
The data collection was done by using a pretested, structured questionnaire consisting of sociodemographic details, various reproductive morbidity details, anthropometry measurements, and clinical examination findings. Pretesting was carried out for standardizing the questionnaire. The results of the pilot study were not included in the final analysis.
Data collection
Married women above 18 years age residing in the field practice area were interviewed by trained female investigators by house-to-house visits and collected data regarding the sociodemographic details and the various reproductive morbidities like signs and symptoms of menstrual, obstetric, and gynecological problems in the past 6 months. Anthropometric measurements and clinical examinations findings were also noted down.
Ethical clearance and informed consent
Ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional Ethical Committee to carry out this study (Ethical committee approval obtained dated 21-03-2018). The purpose and objectives of this study were explained to the participant in detail and informed consent were obtained from those who were willing to participate in the study. Confidentiality of the study subjects was maintained.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
The inclusion criteria for the study was those married women aged 18 years and above residing with their families in the study area and were willing to participate in the study. The exclusion criteria for not including in the study was those who are unwilling to participate in the study and those who are not permanent residents of the study area.
Statistical analysis
Data entry was done by using MS Excel software and analyzed by using SPSS Software Version 22 (manufactured by SPSS Inc. Chicago, USA). Applying appropriate descriptive statistical methods, the results were tabulated.
Results
The study carried out among rural married women in Kancheepuram district to find out the reproductive health status yielded interesting results, which are presented in tables and graphs.
In this study, most of the study participants were in the age group of 21–40 years and nearly 49.2% of the participants had education up to high school level. High percentages (77.1%) of the participants were unemployed owing to their housewife status and 78% of the participants belonged to nuclear families [Table 1].
Table 1.
Sociodemographic characteristics of the study participants
| S. No | Characteristic | Frequency (n=650) | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age in years | |||
| 1 | < 20 | 22 | 3.4 |
| 2 | 21-40 | 358 | 55.1 |
| 3 | 41-60 | 207 | 31.8 |
| 4 | > 61 | 63 | 9.7 |
| Education | |||
| 1 | Illiterate | 96 | 14.8 |
| 2 | Primary School | 87 | 13.4 |
| 3 | Middle School | 94 | 14.5 |
| 4 | High School | 320 | 49.2 |
| 5 | Diploma | 7 | 1.1 |
| 6 | Graduate/PG | 46 | 7.1 |
| Occupation | |||
| 1 | Unemployed | 501 | 77.1 |
| 2 | Unskilled | 57 | 8.8 |
| 3 | Semiprofessional | 68 | 10.5 |
| 4 | Professional | 24 | 3.7 |
| Type of family | |||
| 1 | Nuclear | 507 | 78.0 |
| 2 | Joint | 123 | 18.9 |
| 3 | Three Generation | 20 | 3.0 |
| History of substance abuse | |||
| 1 | Yes | 18 | 2.8 |
| 2 | No | 632 | 97.2 |
It was found that 72.3% of the study participants attained menarche in the age group of 13–15 years. Nearly 90% of the study participants had regular menstrual cycles with duration of 21–35 days and menstrual flow lasting for 2–7 days. Around 16.8% of the participants were passing clots and 37.2% had pain during their menstrual period [Table 2].
Table 2.
Menstrual details of the study participants
| S. No | Characteristic | Frequency (n=650) | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age at menarche | |||
| 1 | <12 years | 108 | 16.6 |
| 2 | 13-15 years | 470 | 72.3 |
| 3 | >16 years | 72 | 11.1 |
| Regularity of the menstrual cycles | |||
| 1 | Regular | 573 | 88.2 |
| 2 | Irregular | 77 | 11.8 |
| Duration of the menstrual cycle | |||
| 1 | Less than 21 days | 22 | 3.4 |
| 2 | 21-35 days | 589 | 90.6 |
| 3 | More than 35 days | 39 | 6 |
| Duration of menstrual flow | |||
| 1 | Less than 2 days | 49 | 7.5 |
| 2 | 2-7 days | 588 | 90.5 |
| 3 | More than 7 days | 13 | 2 |
| Passing clots during menstrual flow | |||
| 1 | Yes | 109 | 16.8 |
| 2 | No | 541 | 83.2 |
| Presence of pain during menstruation | |||
| 1 | Yes | 242 | 37.2 |
| 2 | No | 408 | 62.8 |
From this study, it was found that 10.2% of the study participants had no children while the rest of them had at least one child and 6.4% of the participants were having four of more children. Most of the mothers had their child delivered by normal delivery (68%). Exclusive breastfeeding was followed by 88.9% of mothers. Among the study participants, 30.5% (198) had a history of abortion and among them, 79.7% (158) had at least one abortion, and among those having history of abortion, 70.7% (140) were found to be had a spontaneous abortion [Table 3].
Table 3.
Obstetric details of the study participants
| S. No | Characteristic | Frequency (n=650) | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of children | |||
| 1 | Nil | 66 | 10.2 |
| 2 | One | 143 | 22.0 |
| 3 | Two | 292 | 44.9 |
| 4 | Three | 107 | 16.5 |
| 5 | ≥Four | 42 | 6.4 |
| Type of delivery [n=584] | |||
| 1 | Cesarean Section | 187 | 32.0 |
| 2 | Normal Delivery | 397 | 68.0 |
| Number of abortions [n=198] [30.5%] | |||
| 1 | One | 158 | 79.7 |
| 2 | Two | 32 | 16.1 |
| 3 | ≥Three | 8 | 4.0 |
| Type of abortion [n=198] | |||
| 1 | Spontaneous | 140 | 70.7 |
| 2 | Induced | 58 | 29.3 |
| Exclusive breast feeding [n=584] | |||
| 1 | Given | 519 | 88.9 |
| 2 | Not Given | 65 | 11.1 |
Table 4 shows the contraceptive details of the study participants. Around 78% of the study participants have used contraceptive methods to prevent pregnancy and among them, 66.6% had permanent sterilization like tubectomy, 6.9% took oral contraceptive pills, 19.9% of them used condom, and 6.5% had intrauterine contraceptive device like Copper-T inserted. About 72.6% of the study group utilized government hospitals for their contraceptive needs. The major reason for using contraceptives was for economic reasons (48%), followed by the reasons related to health (20%) and compulsion from family members (22%).
Table 4.
Contraceptive details of the study participants
| No | Contraceptive Characteristic | Frequency | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Use of contraceptives [n=650] | |||
| 1 | Yes | 507 | 78.0 |
| 2 | No | 143 | 22.0 |
| Type of contraceptive used [n=507] | |||
| 1 | Oral Contraceptive pills | 35 | 6.9 |
| 2 | Condom | 101 | 19.9 |
| 3 | IUCD | 33 | 6.5 |
| 4 | Permanent (Sterilization) | 338 | 66.6 |
| Reasons for following contraceptive practices [n=507] | |||
| 1 | Economic reasons | 243 | 48.0 |
| 2 | Social reasons | 51 | 10.0 |
| 3 | Health reasons | 101 | 20.0 |
| 4 | Compulsion | 112 | 22.0 |
| Any complications due to contraception use [n=507] | |||
| 1 | Yes | 76 | 15.0 |
| 2 | No | 431 | 85.0 |
| Source of contraceptives [n=507] | |||
| 1 | Government hospitals | 368 | 72.6 |
| 2 | Health workers | 82 | 16.2 |
| 3 | Shops | 57 | 11.2 |
The major motivating factors for contraceptive use were influenced by health workers (59%) followed by family members (46%), husbands (44%), and the media (44%) [Figure 1].
Figure 1.

Motivating factors for contraceptive use among the study participants: [Multiple responses]
Table 5 shows the clinical characteristics of gynecological morbidity among the study participants. It was found that 67% of the study participants had one or more symptoms related to gynecological problems in the past 6 months. The most common symptoms reported were menorrhagia (14.1%), lower abdominal pain (14.1%), dysmenorrhea (12%), and abnormal vaginal discharge (13.1%). One or more diagnosed gynecological morbidity was present in 31.8% of the study participants, among which, 14% had urinary tract infection, 11.6% had reproductive tract infection, and 3.6% had fibroids.
Table 5.
Clinical characteristics of gynecological morbidity among the study participants
| S. No | Clinical characteristics | Frequency (n=650) | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Presence of any symptom related to gynecological morbidity | 436 | 67.0 | |
| Commonly reported symptom related to gynecological problem | |||
| 1 | Menorrhagia | 92 | 14.1 |
| 2 | Dysmenorrhea | 78 | 12.0 |
| 3 | Lower abdominal pain | 92 | 14.1 |
| 4 | Abnormal Discharge per vaginum | 85 | 13.1 |
| 5 | History of Burning micturition | 38 | 5.8 |
| 6 | History of constipation | 21 | 3.2 |
| 7 | Intermenstrual bleeding | 18 | 1.2 |
| 8 | Dyspareunia | 12 | 1.8 |
| Presence of any diagnosed gynecological morbidity | 207 | 31.8 | |
| Type of Diagnosed gynecological morbidity (n=207) | |||
| 1 | Urinary tract infection | 91 | 14.0 |
| 2 | Reproductive tract infection (Cervicitis/Vaginitis) | 76 | 11.6 |
| 3 | Fibroids | 24 | 3.6 |
| 4 | Endometriosis | 6 | 1.0 |
| 5 | DUB | 5 | 0.7 |
| 6 | Ovarian Cyst | 3 | 0.4 |
| 7 | History of infertility | 2 | 0.3 |
Body mass index of the study participants were calculated using their height and weight. It was found that 30.2% were found to be overweight, 17.1% were in obese Category I, 16.2% were in obese category II, and 6.9% were found to be underweight [Figure 2].
Figure 2.

Nutritional status of the study group (BMI)
Regarding the health-seeking behavior of the study participants, it was found that 62.5% of them seek medical treatment from government hospitals and 92.6% prefer allopathic medical treatment. On physical and clinical examination of the study participants, the diagnosed co-morbidities were found to be pallor (45.5%), breast abnormalities (21%), hypertension (15.5%), diabetes (11.4%), both hypertension and diabetes (4.4%), and clinical goiter (6.9%). Only 10.6% of the study participants had no diagnosed co-morbidity [Table 6].
Table 6.
Health seeking behavior and co-morbidity details of the study participants
| S. No | Health seeking behavior and co-morbidity details | Frequency (n=650) | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seeks medical treatment from | |||
| 1 | Government hospitals | 406 | 62.5 |
| 2 | Private hospitals | 244 | 37.5 |
| Type of Treatment seeking | |||
| 1 | Allopathic | 602 | 92.6 |
| 2 | AYUSH | 23 | 3.5 |
| 3 | Others | 25 | 3.9 |
| Diagnosed co-morbidities | |||
| 1 | Hypertension | 101 | 15.5 |
| 2 | Diabetes | 74 | 11.4 |
| 3 | Both Hypertension and Diabetes | 29 | 4.4 |
| 4 | Pallor | 296 | 45.5 |
| 5 | Breast Abnormalities on examination | 81 | 21.8 |
| 6 | No diagnosed morbidity | 69 | 10.6 |
| Thyroid Problems [Goiter] | |||
| 1 | Grade 0 | 605 | 93.1 |
| 2 | Grade 1 | 35 | 5.4 |
| 3 | Grade 2 | 10 | 1.5 |
Discussion
The reproductive health problems of women are on Global Social agenda for the forthcoming century. Although maternal mortality is an important indicator of women's health, reproductive health status of women serves as an important tool to identify, diagnose, and treat the health issues of the target population so that, they can lead a healthy productive life. This study done in Kancheepuram district of Tamil Nadu has given varied and interesting results regarding the reproductive health status of the study group which are discussed below.
From this study, it was found that 67% of the study participants had one or more symptom related to gynecological problems. Similar results were obtained in a study done by Matthew et al. among married rural women in Karnataka.[10] In a study done by Garg et al., the prevalence of gynecological problems was found to be higher (88%),[11] whereas, in studies done by Indra D Kambo et al., Abraham et al., and Rani et al.,[5,9,12] the prevalence of gynecological problems were found to be comparatively lower (24.4%, 36.85%, and 46.76% respectively). These variations may be attributed to various factors such as educational status, health services available in respective study areas, and health-seeking behavior of the study population.
The most commonly reported gynecological problems were menstrual disorders such as menorrhagia and dysmenorrhea. Similar results were obtained in studies done by Mathew et al. and Mathur et al.[10,13] Urinary tract infections and reproductive tract infections [UTI and RTI] were the most commonly diagnosed gynecological morbidity with prevalence of 14% and 11.6%, respectively. Studies done by Srikala et al. and Muthulakshmi et al., the prevalence of UTI was found to be 12.4% and 20.4%, respectively.[14,15] Abnormal vaginal discharge was found in 13.1% of the study participants and history of RTI was present in 11.6% of study participants. Study done by Mansi et al. found the prevalence of RTI to be 8.1%.[13] This shows that UTI and RTI are more common among married women when compared with other gynecological problems.
Regarding the obstetric details of the study participants, 68% of those who had children delivered by normal delivery, while 32% delivered by cesarean section. A hospital-based study done by Shalini et al. found that 48% mothers had normal delivery while 52% had undergone cesarean section.[16] Similar results were obtained in a study by Priyanka et al.[17] The high cesarean section rate indicates that elective cesarean section was performed along with emergency indications in most of the situations.
The prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding in the present study was found to be 88.9%. Similar results were obtained in a study done by Gopalakrishnan et al.[18] The prevalence was found to be comparatively lower in studies conducted by Chedarla et al. (64%) and Umadevi et al. (38.8%).[19,20] This may be attributed to the increased awareness of the study population on the benefits of exclusive breastfeeding.
The prevalence of contraceptive use among the study participants was found to be comparatively high at 78% while studies done by Qazi et al. and Thulaseedharan found the prevalence of contraceptive use to be 60% and 57.1%, respectively.[21,22] Among the study participants, 64.1% of the study participants were found to be overweight/obese while in studies done by Karthik et al. and Prasad et al., the prevalence of obesity was found to be 49.8% and 62%, respectively.[23,24] This higher prevalence of obesity may be attributed to the fact that majority of the study participants (77.1%) were housewives who might be having a sedentary lifestyle. The high prevalence of obesity among women in reproductive age group increases the risk of developing ovulatory problems, poor compliance to oral contraceptive pills, miscarriage, urinary incontinence, fibroids, and menstrual problems.[25]
It was found that 62.5% of the study participants preferred government hospitals for their medical treatment. These findings are contradictory to findings in studies done by Abraham et al. and Mathew et al.[9,10] This preference may have been due to easy accessibility and availability of government health services in the study area when compared to private hospitals. Pallor, diabetes, and hypertension were the most prevalent co-morbidities among the study population. The high prevalence of menstrual problems among the study participants could have been one among the causes of increased presence of pallor and the participants have to be further evaluated for grading of anemia. Diabetic women are vulnerable to develop urinary tract infections and reproductive tract infections and, hence, early diagnosis and treatment is mandatory to prevent occurrence of associated co-morbidities.
Relevance of this study to the practice of primary health care
This study and its finding are very much relevant to the practicing primary health care physicians and family physicians in our country. Primary health care/family physicians play a major role in the early identification and diagnosis of gynecological problems among women, as they are the first level of contact of patients with the healthcare facilities. It is imperative that all the primary health care/family physicians should be trained and sensitized adequately to provide holistic medical care to all women, so that, most of their reproductive morbidities can be screened for early diagnosis and treated adequately to help them lead a better quality of life.
Conclusion
This study shows the reproductive health status of the study population and their health-seeking behavior with the major finding of high prevalence of gynecological morbidities among them. This necessitates planning and implementing various health education and awareness creation activities along with the existing programs to be directed against the target population. Therefore, women will be empowered to take care of their health problems at an earlier stage. Women's active participation in their health-seeking behavior has to be encouraged further so that proper preventive and curative women-centric services can be provided to improve their overall reproductive health and general well-being.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgments
The authors hereby acknowledge profusely the contribution and support given by the Medical officers and the Field Staff of the Rural Health Training Center and the Interns and Postgraduate students for successful completion of this study. Special thanks are due to Dr. M. Muthulakshmi MD for helping us in the data analysis.
References
- 1.UNITED NATIONS POPULATION INFORMATION NETWORK (POPIN). Guidelines on Reproductive Health. [Last accessed on 2019 Jun 05]. Available from: https://www.un.org/popin/unfpa/taskforce/ guide/iatfreph.gdl.html .
- 2.United Nations Population Fund. Sexual and Reproductive Health. [Last accessed on 2019 Jun 06]. Available from: https://www.unfpa.org/sexual-reproductive-health .
- 3.WHO. Measuring Reproductive Morbidity. Geneva: 1989. [Last accessed on 2019 Jun 06]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/61306/WHO_MCH_90.4.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y . [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sajan F, Fikree FF. Perceived gynecological morbidity among young ever-married women living in squatter settlements of Karachi, Pakistan. JPMA. 1999;49:92–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kambo IP, Dhillon BS, Singh P, Saxena BN, Saxena NC. Self reported gynecological problems from twenty-three districts of India. Indian J Community Med. 2003;28:67–72. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gosalia VV, Verma PB, Doshi VG, Singh M, Rathod SK, Parmar MT. Gynecological morbidities in women of reproductive age group in urban slums of Bhavnagar city. Natl J Commun Med. 2012;3:657–60. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Dheresa M, Assefa N, Berhane Y, Worku A, Mingiste B, Dessie Y. Gynecological morbidity among women in reproductive age: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Womens Health Care. 2017;6:367. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Pandurang S, Reshmi RS, Daliya S. Obstetric morbidity among currently married women in selected states of India. J Fam Welf. 2009;55:17–26. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Abraham A, Varghese S, Satheesh M, Vijayakumar K, Gopakumar S, Mendez AM. Pattern of gynecological morbidity, its factors and Health seeking behaviour among reproductive age group women in a rural community of Thiruvananthapuram district, South Kerala. Indian J Community Health. 2014;26:230–7. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mathew L, Francis J, Alma L. Prevalence of gynaecological morbidity and treatment seeking behaviour among married women in rural Karnataka: A cross sectional survey. JKIMSU. 2017;6:85–93. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Garg S, Sharma N, Bhalla P, Sahay R, Saha R, Raina U, et al. Reproductive morbidity in an Indian urban slum: Need for health action. Sex Transm Infect. 2002;78:68–9. doi: 10.1136/sti.78.1.68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rani V, Dixit AM, Kumar S, Singh NP, Jain PK, Peeyush K. Reproductive morbidity profile among ever married women (15-44) years of rural Etawah District, Uttar Pradesh: A cross-sectional study. Community Med. 2015;7:35–40. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mathur M, Das R, Vibha Common gynecological morbidities among married women in a resettlement colony of East Delhi. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017;6:5330–5. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Srikala PT, Jessima S. Prevalence of urinary tract infection among school going adolescent girls in rural part of Chennai. IAIM. 2019;6:278–82. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Muthulakshmi M, Gopalakrishnan S. Study on urinary tract infection among females of reproductive age group in a rural area of Kancheepuram district, Tamil Nadu. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2017;4:3915–21. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Shalini S, Gopalakrishnan S. Breastfeeding practices of nursing mothers in Tamil Nadu: A hospital based cross sectional study. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2018;5:4441–9. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Singh P, Hashmi G, Swain PK. High prevalence of cesarean section births in private sector health facilities-analysis of district level household survey-4 (DLHS-4) of India. BMC Public Health. 2018;18:613. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5533-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gopalakrishnan S, Eashwar VM, Muthulakshmi M. Health-seeking behaviour among antenatal and postnatal rural women in Kancheepuram District of Tamil Nadu: A cross-sectional study. J Family Med Prim Care. 2019;8:1035–42. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_323_18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Cheedarla V, Bhavani K, Vemuri JLN, Reshaboyina LRL. A study on breast feeding practices among mothers in urban field practice area of tertiary care center, Hyderabad. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2019;6:870–4. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Umadevi R, Rashmi GP. Prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding among rural women in Kancheepuram District, Tamil Nadu. Indian J Forensic Community Med. 2017;4:277–9. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Qazi M, Saqib N, Gupta S. Knowledge, attitude and practice of family planning among women of reproductive age group attending outpatient department in a tertiary centre of Northern India. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2019;8:1775–83. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Thulaseedharan JV. Contraceptive use and preferences of young married women in Kerala, India. Open Access J Contracept. 2018;9:1–10. doi: 10.2147/OAJC.S152178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Karthik RC, Gopalakrishnan S. Evaluation of obesity and its risk factors among rural adults in Tamil Nadu, India. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2018;5:3611–7. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Prasad A, Shylajakumari NR, Kandasamy K, Nallasamy V, Rajagopal SS, Ramanathan SK. Prevalence of obesity and its co-morbidities: A study among Thattankuttai population of Namakkal District, India. Indian J Pharm Pract. 2017;10:121. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Pandey S, Bhattacharya S. Impact of obesity on gynecology. Women's Health. 2010;6:107–17. doi: 10.2217/whe.09.77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
