Abstract
The emergence and prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) in livestock animals have become a worldwide public health concern. While the prevalence and genetic profiles of MRSA strains in pigs and pork meat have been actively studied, livestock-associated MSSA strains have only been characterized in a few small-scale studies. In this investigation, we assessed the nationwide prevalence of MSSA in the Korean pig production chain, including pig farms, slaughterhouses, and retail markets. Among the 41 MSSA strains, the predominant clonal lineages were sequence type (ST) 398 (n = 15, 37%) and ST5 (n = 13, 32%). Although the overall prevalence of MSSA (2.58%) was low and mostly restricted to pig farms, ST398 MSSA strains showed higher level of multidrug resistance phenotype versus non-ST398 MSSA strains. In addition to the MDR phenotype, all of the ST398 MSSA strains exhibited resistance to tetracycline as they harbored the tet(K), tet(L), and/or tet(M) genes. However, ST398 MSSA strains did not exhibit increased resistance to zinc compared with the non-ST398 strains. This study is the first to provide evidence of ST398 MSSA emergence in livestock animals in Korea. Further studies are necessary to elucidate the potential of ST398 MSSA strains for human transmission. Our findings suggest that the MDR phenotype and high levels of tetracycline resistance may have played an important role in the emergence and prevalence of ST398 MSSA in pig farms in Korea.
Keywords: MSSA, ST398, pig, antimicrobial resistance, zinc resistance
INTRODUCTION
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a major cause of septicemia in hospital-associated (HA) and community-associated settings [1]. Recently, an increase in the incidence of livestock-associated (LA)-MRSA infections has been reported in various animal species, particularly in the incidence of sequence type (ST) 398 MRSA in pigs in European countries and North America [2,3]. ST398 LA-MRSA strains have also been isolated from people in close contact with pigs, indicating the transmission of LA-MRSA between pigs and humans [2]. The prevalence of ST398 LA-MRSA strains in pig farms seems to be associated with the use of antibiotics, particularly tetracycline compounds [4,5]. ST398 LA-MRSA isolates tend to exhibit multidrug resistance (MDR) phenotypes to various antimicrobial agents [6,7]. Over the past decade, increased number of infections caused by ST398 methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) has also been reported in humans [8,9]. Bouiller et al. [10] reported that clonal complex (CC) 398 MSSA bloodstream infections were more highly associated with fatal outcomes than non-CC398 MSSA infections.
Although the prevalence of ST398 MRSA in pigs and pork meat samples has been investigated extensively [11,12,13], limited information is available on the prevalence and characteristics of ST398 MSSA isolates in the pork production chain in Korea. In this study, we investigated national prevalence of MSSA in the pork production chain, including pig farms, slaughterhouses, and retail markets. In addition, we analyzed the multilocus sequence types (MLST), accessory gene regulator (agr) types, staphylococcal protein A (spa) types, and staphylococcal enterotoxin (SE) types to genetically characterize the MSSA strains. Furthermore, antimicrobial resistance and zinc resistance profiles were examined to identify potential correlations with the prevalence of the ST398 MSSA isolates.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
S. aureus strains and culture conditions
The 41 MSSA isolates used in this study are listed in Table 1. A total of 1587 swab samples were obtained from pig farms (n = 19), slaughterhouses (n = 7), and retail markets (n = 35) in 8 different provinces of Korea over the period of 14-months between 2017 and 2018. Pig farm samples were obtained from finishing pigs (n = 760), the farm environment (n = 114), and farm workers (n = 135); slaughterhouse samples were obtained from pig carcasses (n = 280), the facility environments (n = 18), and slaughterhouse workers (n = 13); and retail market samples were obtained from fresh pork meat samples (n = 260), the facility environments (n = 3), and market workers (n = 4) were collected.
Table 1. Summary of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus investigated in this study.
| Strain | MLST | Source | Staphylococcal protein A type | Accessory gene regulator type | Antimicrobial resistance | tet-R genes* | TET MICs (µg/mL)† | czrC | Zinc MICs (mM/mL)‡ | SEs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PJFA-443 | ST398 | Pig | t1451 | I | AMP, CHL, CIP, CLI, ERY, GEN, STX, SYN, TET | tet(K), tet(L) | 16 | − | 4 | - |
| PJFA-463 | ST398 | Pig | t1451 | I | AMP, CHL, CIP, CLI, ERY, TET | tet(M) | 16 | + | 4 | - |
| PJFA-493 | ST398 | Pig | t1451 | I | AMP, CHL, CIP, CLI, ERY, TET | tet(M) | 16 | − | 5 | - |
| PJFA-413 | ST398 | Pig | NT | I | AMP, CHL, CIP, CLI, ERY, TET | tet(M) | 16 | − | 5 | - |
| PJFA-514 | ST398 | Pig | t664 | I | AMP, CHL, CLI, ERY, GEN, SYN, TET | tet(L) | 16 | + | 8 | - |
| PCFH-311 | ST398 | Farm worker | t571 | I | AMP, TET | tet(M) | 16 | − | 2 | - |
| PSFH-111 | ST398 | Farm worker | t571 | I | AMP, CHL, CIP, TET | tet(M) | 16 | − | 2 | - |
| PSFH-121 | ST398 | Farm worker | t571 | I | AMP, CHL, CIP, TET | tet(M) | 16 | − | 2 | - |
| PSFH-321 | ST398 | Farm worker | t571 | I | AMP, CHL, CIP, CLI, ERY, GEN, SYN, TET | tet(M), tet(L) | 16 | − | 4 | - |
| PSFH-331 | ST398 | Farm worker | t571 | I | AMP, CHL, CIP, CLI, ERY, GEN, SYN, TET | tet(M), tet(L) | 16 | − | 4 | - |
| PSFH-341 | ST398 | Farm worker | t571 | I | AMP, CHL, CIP, CLI, ERY, GEN, SYN, TET | tet(M), tet(L) | 16 | − | 4 | - |
| PSFH-351 | ST398 | Farm worker | t571 | I | AMP, CHL, CIP, CLI, ERY, GEN, STX, SYN, TET | tet(M), tet(L) | 16 | − | 4 | - |
| PJFH-511 | ST398 | Farm worker | t571 | I | AMP, CHL, CIP, CLI, ERY, MUP, STX, TET | tet(M), tet(K) | 16 | + | 4 | sec |
| PSFH331 | ST398 | Farm worker | t18103 | I | AMP, CHL, CIP, CLI, ERY, GEN, STX, SYN, TET | tet(K), tet(L) | 16 | − | 4 | - |
| PJFE-306 | ST398 | Farm environment | t571 | I | AMP, CHL, CIP, CLI, ERY, TET | tet(M) | 16 | + | 2 | - |
| PKFA-581 | ST5 | Pig | t002 | I | AMP, CHL, GEN, SYN | - | 1 | − | 4 | - |
| PCFA-241 | ST5 | Pig | t002 | III | AMP, CHL, CLI | - | 0.5 | + | 4 | - |
| PKFA-521 | ST5 | Pig | t002 | II | AMP, CHL | - | 1 | − | 4 | - |
| PKFA-512 | ST5 | Pig | t002 | II | AMP, CHL | - | 1 | − | 4 | - |
| PKFA-532 | ST5 | Pig | t002 | II | AMP, CHL | - | 1 | − | 4 | - |
| PKFA-592 | ST5 | Pig | t010 | II | AMP, CHL | - | 1 | − | 4 | - |
| PKFA-513 | ST5 | Pig | t002 | II | AMP, CHL, GEN | - | 2 | − | 4 | - |
| PKFA-523 | ST5 | Pig | t002 | II | AMP, CHL | - | 1 | − | 4 | - |
| PKFA-563 | ST5 | Pig | t002 | II | AMP, CHL | - | 1 | − | 4 | - |
| PKFA-584 | ST5 | Pig | t7083 | II | AMP, CHL | - | 1 | − | 4 | - |
| PGFH-222 | ST5 | Farm worker | t899 | II | AMP | - | 1 | + | 4 | - |
| PJSH-311 | ST5 | Slaughterhouse worker | t5440 | II | AMP | - | 1 | − | 4 | - |
| PKFE-503 | ST5 | Farm environment | t002 | II | AMP, CHL, GEN | - | 8 | − | 4 | - |
| PKFH-511 | ST9 | Farm worker | t1939 | II | AMP, CHL, CLI, GEN, TET | tet(L) | 64 | − | 4 | - |
| PKFH-521 | ST9 | Farm worker | t1939 | II | AMP, CHL, CLI, GEN, TET | tet(L) | 64 | − | 4 | - |
| PKFH-531 | ST9 | Farm worker | t1939 | II | AMP, CHL, CLI, GEN, TET | tet(L) | 64 | − | 4 | - |
| PGSM131 | ST9 | Slaughterhouse carcass | t337 | II | AMP, CHL, MUP | tet(L) | 4 | − | 2 | - |
| PCFH-351 | ST188 | Farm worker | t8275 | I | AMP, CHL | - | 1 | − | 4 | - |
| PSMH-616 | ST188 | Retail market worker | t189 | I | AMP | - | 1 | − | 4 | - |
| PCFH-211 | ST433 | Farm worker | t021 | II | AMP | - | 1 | − | 4 | - |
| PSFH-211 | ST433 | Farm worker | t021 | III | AMP | - | 1 | + | 4 | - |
| PKFA-542 | ST403 | Pig | t002 | II | AMP, CHL | - | 2 | − | 4 | - |
| PGFH-221 | ST554 | Farm worker | t002 | II | AMP, TET | tet(L) | 32 | + | 4 | - |
| PSMH-611 | ST1 | Retail market worker | t18104 | III | AMP, ERY | - | 2 | − | 4 | - |
| PKFA552 | ST2115 | Pig | t002 | II | AMP, CHL, MUP | tet(L) | 4 | − | 4 | - |
| PKFA-553 | NT | Pig | t664 | II | AMP, CHL, CLI, STX, TET | tet(L) | 64 | + | 4 | - |
AMP, ampicillin; CHL, chloramphenicol; CIP, ciprofloxacin; CLI, clindamycin; ERY, erythromycin; GEN, gentamicin; MUP, mupirocin; SXT, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; SYN, quinupristin-dalfopristin; TET, tetracycline; NT, non-typeable.
*Tetracycline resistance genes; tet(K), tet(L), tet(M), tet(O) and tet(S); †Tetracycline MICs ≥ 16 μg/mL indicate resistance; ‡MIC values of > 2 mM indicate zinc resistance.
Within 24-h of sampling, all swab samples were inoculated into 5 mL of tryptic soy broth (TSB; Difco Laboratories, USA) supplemented with 10% NaCl and cultured at 37°C. Pork meat samples (25 g) were homogenized in 225 mL of 10% NaCl-TSB and incubated at 37°C. After 24 h, 10 µL aliquots of the pre-enriched media were streaked onto Baired Parker agar (BPA; Difco Laboratories) and incubated for 16–18 h at 37°C. All S. aureus strains were identified using the Vitek 2 system (bioMérieux, France) and 16S rRNA sequencing [14]. All MSSA strains were mecA-negative and susceptible to cefoxitin and oxacillin (data not shown).
Susceptibility assays
Susceptibilities to antimicrobial agents were determined using the disk diffusion methods according to the 2017 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines [15]. The antimicrobial agents used were chloramphenicol (30 μg), clindamycin (2 μg), erythromycin (15 μg), ampicillin (10 μg), cefoxitin (30 μg), gentamicin (30 μg), sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (23.73–1.25 μg), dalfopristin (15 μg), rifampin (5 μg), tetracycline (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), and mupirocin (200 μg, Oxoid, UK). All antibiotic discs were purchased from BD BBL, unless stated otherwise. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) to oxacillin, tetracycline, linezolid, vancomycin, and teicoplanin were determined using the standard E-test (bioMérieux) on Meuller-Hinton agar (MHA) plates. The MICs to zinc chloride were determined using the standard agar dilution assay (range, 0.25–16 mM) as described previously [16]. All the susceptibility tests were repeated three times.
Molecular characterization and typing
Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) was performed on all confirmed MSSA strains as described previously [17]. Briefly, 7 PCR-amplified housekeeping genes (arcC, aroE, glpF, gmk, pta, tpi, and yqiL) were sequenced and the sequence types (STs) were assigned according to the S. aureus MLST database (http://pubmlst.org/saureus/). The agr types (I-IV) of the MSSA strains were determined by multiplex PCR assays, as described previously [18]. Determinations of the spa types on all MSSA strains were performed using a specific primer set [19]. The PCR products were sequenced, and the spa type was determined based on the variable number tandem repeats in the SpaServer database (http://spa.ridom.de/). Sequencing of all PCR products was performed at Cosmo Genetech (Korea).
Tetracycline resistance (tetK, tetL, tetM, tetO, and tetS) and zinc resistance (czrC) genes were detected by PCR with specific primer sets, as described previously [16,20].
Detection of SE and Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) genes
The presence of five different staphylococcal enterotoxin genes (sea, seb, sec, sed, and see), PVL gene, and the toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 gene (tst1) in all MSSA strains was examined by using multiplex-PCR assays as described previously [21]. Genomic DNA samples from reference S. aureus strains were included as positive controls (FRI913: sea, sec, see, tst1; COL: seb; and FRI472: sed) [22].
Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test (GraphPad Software Inc., USA, www.Graph Pad.com), with a p values of < 0.05 considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
Prevalence of MSSA in pig farms, slaughterhouses, and retail outlets
A total of 41 MSSA strains (2.58%) were isolated from 1,587 samples collected from pig farms, slaughterhouses, and retail markets during the 14-months of study period (Table 1). As shown in Fig. 1, 37 of the MSSA strains (90%) were isolated from pig farms and 4 MSSA strains were isolated from slaughterhouses and retail markets (2 strains each). Among the 37 MSSA strains isolated from pig farms, 19 and 16 strains were isolated from pigs and farm workers, respectively, whilst 2 strains were isolated from the environment (one from a pig pen and one from a toilet). No MSSA strains were isolated from pork meat samples.
Fig. 1. Prevalence and genetic profiles of MSSA isolates recovered from pig farms, slaughterhouses, and retail markets. Each square represents an individual MSSA isolate.
NT, non-typeable for MLST; MSSA, methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus.
Genetic profiles of the MSSA strains
MLST analyses of the 41 MSSA strains revealed 9 different ST types, with one non-typeable strain isolated from a pig (Fig. 1). The most significant clonal lineage among the 9 ST types was ST398 (n = 15, 37%), followed by ST5 (n = 13, 32%), ST9 (n = 4, 10%), ST188 (n = 2, 4.9%), ST433 (n = 2, 4.9%), ST403 (n = 1, 2.4%), ST554 (n = 1, 2.4%), ST1 (n = 1, 2.4%), and ST2115 (n = 1, 2.4%). All ST398 MSSA strains were isolated only from pig farms (pigs, farm workers, and farm environment), with none isolated from the slaughterhouse or retail market samples. Similarly, all 12 ST5 MSSA strains were isolated from pig farms, except for one which was isolated from a slaughterhouse worker. Sequence analyses of spa in the 41 MSSA strains revealed 15 different spa types (Table 1). Interestingly, 3/5 ST398 MSSA strains isolated from pigs had t451 type, while 9/10 ST398 MSSA strains isolated from farm workers/farm environment were t571 type. This difference in spa types between the swine-associated MSSA strains and the MSSA strains from farm/slaughterhouse workers was also observed in the ST5 MSSA strains (t002 vs. t899/t5440). Conversely, all ST398 MSSA strains belonged to agr type I regardless of the sample source, and no differences were observed in the agr type of the ST5 MSSA strains depending on the sample sources.
Antimicrobial resistance profiles of the MSSA strains
All 41 MSSA strains displayed resistance to ampicillin, and they were all susceptible to rifampin (Fig. 2). As shown in Table 1, ST398 MSSA strains tended to have higher level of multidrug resistance (MDR) phenotype (resistant to more than three antimicrobial classes) than the other ST types of strains. Specifically, as demonstrated by the results in Fig. 2A and B, 14/15 ST398 MSSA strains (93%) and 10/26 non-ST398 MSSA strains (38.5%) exhibited an MDR phenotype. The ST389 MSSA strains displayed higher levels of resistance to chloramphenicol, clindamycin, erythromycin, gentamycin, sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim, quinupristin-dalfopristin, tetracycline, and ciprofloxacin (Fig. 2C and D). Notably, all the ST398 MSSA strains harbored one or two tetracycline resistance genes (tetM, tetK, or tetL) and displayed 100% resistance to tetracycline (Table 1). However, none of the 41 MSSA strains harbored tetO or tetS for tetracycline resistance phenotype. All the MSSA strains were susceptible to linezolid, vancomycin, teicoplanin, and daptomycin based on the E-test results (data not shown).
Fig. 2. Antimicrobial susceptibility and frequency of MDR phenotype. Antimicrobial susceptibility of (A) the CC398 and (B) non-CC398 MSSA isolates and frequency of MDR phenotype in (C) the CC398 and (D) non-CC398 MSSA isolates. Susceptibility assays were performed using the disc diffusion methods according to the 2017 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines [15].
AMP, ampicillin; CHL, chloramphenicol; CLI, clindamycin; ERY, erythromycin; CEF, cefoxitin; GEN, gentamicin; RIF, rifampicin; SXT, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; SYN, quinupristin-dalfopristin; TET, tetracycline; CIP, ciprofloxacin; MUP, and mupirocin; MDR, multidrug resistance.
Detection of czrC and zinc chloride MICs
It has been proposed that zinc resistance is associated with specific clonal lineages of MRSA, such as the ST398 and ST541 MRSA strains [23]. Although only 9 of the MSSA strains (22%) were positive for czrC gene, all 41 MSSA strains displayed zinc chloride MICs of > 2 mM, indicating a czrC-independent zinc resistance phenotype. Among the nine MSSA strains, czrC carriage was not associated with specific ST types, spa types, or agr types.
Staphylococcal enterotoxin genes
None of the MSSA strains carried genes for SEs or TSST-1, except for a single ST398 MSSA strain from a pig farm worker, which was positive for sec (Table 1). All MSSA strains were negative for the PVL gene.
DISCUSSION
ST398 MRSA has frequently been reported in livestock animals, particularly in pigs [24], and a growing number of incidents are being reported in which humans are infected with ST398 MRSA via direct or indirect exposure [9,25]. Although still at a significantly lower prevalence than in most European countries, the ST398 clonal lineage has become a major LA-MRSA clone in Korea [26,27,28]. Furthermore, recent studies have demonstrated that ST398 MSSA is an emerging zoonotic pathogen, able to colonize both humans and animals [2,8,9]. Although the detailed mechanisms of pathogenicity in ST398 MSSA remain to be elucidated, this clonal lineage of MSSA has been reported to cause fatal infections in humans with/without direct animal contact [29,30].
In the current study, we investigated the genotypic and phenotypic characteristics of MSSA strains isolated from the pork production chain, including pig farms, slaughterhouses, and retail markets.
The overall carriage of MSSA in pigs, farm workers, and the farm environment was 2.4%, 50%, and 1.6%, respectively. The prevalence of MSSA in pigs observed in this study was somewhat lower than the MRSA prevalence (3.2%–4.4%) reported by previous studies in Korea [27,28]. However, 17/34 (50%) of the pig farm workers carried MSSA in their anterior nasal cavity, higher than the previously reported MRSA prevalence (16.7%) in pig farm workers [28]. This study is the first to investigate the prevalence and molecular characteristics of MSSA strains from pigs and pig farm workers in Korea. Therefore, continuous surveillance programs are required to monitor prevalence of MSSA as well as MRSA in the pork production chain.
MLST analyses revealed that ST398 (37%) and ST5 (32%) were the two major clonal lineages in Korean pig farms (Table 1 and Fig. 1). ST398 MSSA has been identified as a predominant clone in pigs from other Asian countries, such as Japan and China [31,32]. In agreement with these previous reports [31,32,33], ST398 MSSA with spa type t571 (ST398 MSSA-t571) was mainly associated with human hosts (Table 1). Unlike these previous studies, which reported the prevalence of ST398 MSSA-t034 in pigs and pork meat samples, the ST398 MSSA strains isolated from pigs in this study had spa types of t1451 (n = 4) or t664 (n = 1) spa types. ST398 MSSA-t1451 has previously been reported in human bloodstream infections in New York [34]. In addition to t571, t1451, and t664, an ST398 MSSA-t18103 strain was isolated from a pig farm worker, suggesting that a rapid evolutionary change occurred in response to the new host environment. As shown in Table 1, the second most prevalent clonal lineage in the MSSA strains was ST5, in particular ST5 MSSA-t002 (n = 9). ST5 MRSA has been well recognized as one of the most globally disseminated HA-MRSA and LA-MRSA lineages [35]. However, little attention has been paid to its prevalence in livestock animals. The ST5 MSSA-t002 clone was identified among MSSA strains collected from hospitals in Denmark and UK in 1957 [36], indicating that this clonal type has successfully adapted to both human and pig populations. Interestingly, although nine different spa types (t1451, t664, t571, t18103, t002, t010, t7083, t899, and t5440) were identified in the two most prevalent ST types, ST398 and ST5, none of the spa types were shared by the two ST types. Importantly, the spa types of the ST398 and ST5 MSSA strains differed depending on whether the strains were isolated from humans or pigs, indicating rapid evolutionary adaptation to different hosts. Furthermore, all ST398 and ST5 MSSA strains were isolated from pig farms except for one ST5 strain isolated from a slaughterhouse worker, suggesting that the two major ST types of MSSA strains are mostly associated with pigs, farm workers, or the farm environment.
Recent studies have shown that ST398 MRSA tends to exhibit an MDR phenotype with 100% resistance to tetracycline [5,37]. Similarly, we found that more ST398 MSSA strains exhibited an MDR phenotype than the non-ST398 MSSA strains (93% and 38.5%, respectively; Fig. 2A-D). Importantly, all of the ST398 MSSA strains were resistant to tetracycline by harboring one or two of tet(K), tet(L), and/or tet(M) genes. This high level of tetracycline resistance phenotype mediated by tet(K), tet(L), and/or tet(M) genes has been well recognized in CC398 (ST398 and ST541) LA-MRSA strains [38]. In addition to the ST398 MSSA strains, all four ST9 MSSA strains and the three other MSSA strains (one ST544, one ST2115, and one non-typeable strain) carried tet(L), although one of the ST9 MSSA strains and the ST2115 strain did not exhibit a tetracycline resistance phenotype. These data combined with the MDR phenotype in ST398 MSSA suggest that ST398 MSSA strains may have been selected for by various antimicrobial agents, especially tetracycline. In contrast, all the ST5 MSSA strains were susceptible to tetracycline and did not possess the tetracycline resistance genes, warranting further characterization of ST5 MSSA to elucidate how these MSSA strains are transmitted between pigs despite exhibiting lower antimicrobial resistance than the ST398 MSSA strains.
Previous studies have suggested that resistance to zinc and other metals may co-select for CC398 MRSA strains carrying the czrC gene in staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) type V [16,23]. The 41 MSSA strains displayed zinc chloride MICs of 2–8 mM, and nine of them were positive for the czrC gene. Neither the zinc chloride MIC nor presence of the czrC gene was associated with specific genotypes of the MSSA strains. Unlike the previous studies of CC398 MRSA [39,40], these data suggested that the use of zinc in animal feed might not contribute towards the prevalence of the ST398 and ST5 MSSA strains in pig farms in Korea.
It should be noted that our current study has several limitations. Firstly, since our data were generated based on a limited number of MSSA strains; therefore, further studies with a larger number of MSSA strains are required. Secondly, information on antibiotic usage in pig farms, particularly tetracycline usage, was not available; however, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to characterize MSSA strains collected from the Korean pork production chain and report the prevalence of ST398 LA-MSSA in pig farms in Korea.
In conclusion, the two major clonal lineages of MSSA in the pork production chain in Korea were ST398 and ST9 MSSA, which were mainly isolated from pig farms (pigs and farm workers). The prevalence of ST398 MSSA in pig farms appears to be associated with their MDR phenotype, especially their resistance to tetracycline. Since the increasing number of fatal infections caused by ST398 MSSA has posed a major public health concern, comprehensive surveillance should be continued for MSSA in livestock animals.
Footnotes
Funding: This research was supported by a fund from Research of Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2017NER54060 to S.J.Y.).
- Conceptualization: Yang SJ.
- Data curation: Yang SJ, Eom HS.
- Formal analysis: Eom HS, Yang SJ.
- Funding acquisition: Yang SJ.
- Investigation: Eom HS, Back SH, Lee HH, Lee GY.
- Methodology: Eom HS, Back SH, Lee HH, Lee GY, Yang SJ.
- Project administration: Eom HS, Back SH, Yang SJ.
- Writing - original draft: Yang SJ, Eom HS.
- Writing - review & editing: Yang SJ.
References
- 1.Schlievert PM, Strandberg KL, Lin YC, Peterson ML, Leung DY. Secreted virulence factor comparison between methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, and its relevance to atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;125:39–49. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.10.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sahibzada S, Abraham S, Coombs GW, Pang S, Hernández-Jover M, Jordan D, Heller J. Transmission of highly virulent community-associated MRSA ST93 and livestock-associated MRSA ST398 between humans and pigs in Australia. Sci Rep. 2017;7:5273. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04789-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Reynaga E, Navarro M, Vilamala A, Roure P, Quintana M, Garcia-Nuñez M, Figueras R, Torres C, Lucchetti G, Sabrià M. Prevalence of colonization by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 in pigs and pig farm workers in an area of Catalonia, Spain. BMC Infect Dis. 2016;16:716. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-2050-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sørensen AI, Toft N, Boklund A, Espinosa-Gongora C, Græsbøll K, Larsen J, Halasa T. A mechanistic model for spread of livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (LA-MRSA) within a pig herd. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0188429. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Larsen J, Clasen J, Hansen JE, Paulander W, Petersen A, Larsen AR, Frees D. Copresence of tet(K) and tet(M) in livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clonal complex 398 is associated with increased fitness during exposure to sublethal concentrations of tetracycline. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;60:4401–4403. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00426-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Vanderhaeghen W, Cerpentier T, Adriaensen C, Vicca J, Hermans K, Butaye P. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) ST398 associated with clinical and subclinical mastitis in Belgian cows. Vet Microbiol. 2010;144:166–171. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.12.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ge B, Mukherjee S, Hsu CH, Davis JA, Tran TT, Yang Q, Abbott JW, Ayers SL, Young SR, Crarey ET, Womack NA, Zhao S, McDermott PF. MRSA and multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in U.S. retail meats, 2010–2011. Food Microbiol. 2017;62:289–297. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2016.10.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Pantosti A. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus associated with animals and its relevance to human health. Front Microbiol. 2012;3:127. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Witte W, Strommenger B, Stanek C, Cuny C. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 in humans and animals, Central Europe. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:255–258. doi: 10.3201/eid1302.060924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bouiller K, Gbaguidi-Haore H, Hocquet D, Cholley P, Bertrand X, Chirouze C. Clonal complex 398 methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections are associated with high mortality. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016;22:451–455. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.01.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Smith TC, Male MJ, Harper AL, Kroeger JS, Tinkler GP, Moritz ED, Capuano AW, Herwaldt LA, Diekema DJ. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strain ST398 is present in midwestern U.S. swine and swine workers. PLoS One. 2009;4:e4258. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.de Boer E, Zwartkruis-Nahuis JT, Wit B, Huijsdens XW, de Neeling AJ, Bosch T, van Oosterom RA, Vila A, Heuvelink AE. Prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in meat. Int J Food Microbiol. 2009;134:52–56. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Köck R, Harlizius J, Bressan N, Laerberg R, Wieler LH, Witte W, Deurenberg RH, Voss A, Becker K, Friedrich AW. Prevalence and molecular characteristics of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) among pigs on German farms and import of livestock-related MRSA into hospitals. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009;28:1375–1382. doi: 10.1007/s10096-009-0795-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Forsman P, Tilsala-Timisjärvi A, Alatossava T. Identification of staphylococcal and streptococcal causes of bovine mastitis using 16S-23S rRNA spacer regions. Microbiology. 1997;143:3491–3500. doi: 10.1099/00221287-143-11-3491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Weinstein MP. Performance standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. CLSI document M100-S27. Wayne: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2017. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Cavaco LM, Hasman H, Stegger M, Andersen PS, Skov R, Fluit AC, Ito T, Aarestrup FM. Cloning and occurrence of czrC, a gene conferring cadmium and zinc resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus CC398 isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54:3605–3608. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00058-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Enright MC, Day NP, Davies CE, Peacock SJ, Spratt BG. Multilocus sequence typing for characterization of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible clones of Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:1008–1015. doi: 10.1128/jcm.38.3.1008-1015.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gilot P, Lina G, Cochard T, Poutrel B. Analysis of the genetic variability of genes encoding the RNA III-activating components Agr and TRAP in a population of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from cows with mastitis. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40:4060–4067. doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.11.4060-4067.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Harmsen D, Claus H, Witte W, Rothgänger J, Claus H, Turnwald D, Vogel U. Typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a university hospital setting by using novel software for spa repeat determination and database management. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:5442–5448. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.12.5442-5448.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ng LK, Martin I, Alfa M, Mulvey M. Multiplex PCR for the detection of tetracycline resistant genes. Mol Cell Probes. 2001;15:209–215. doi: 10.1006/mcpr.2001.0363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Becker K, Roth R, Peters G. Rapid and specific detection of toxigenic Staphylococcus aureus: use of two multiplex PCR enzyme immunoassays for amplification and hybridization of staphylococcal enterotoxin genes, exfoliative toxin genes, and toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 gene. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:2548–2553. doi: 10.1128/jcm.36.9.2548-2553.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Park JY, Fox LK, Seo KS, McGuire MA, Park YH, Rurangirwa FR, Sischo WM, Bohach GA. Detection of classical and newly described staphylococcal superantigen genes in coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from bovine intramammary infections. Vet Microbiol. 2011;147:149–154. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.06.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hau SJ, Frana T, Sun J, Davies PR, Nicholson TL. Zinc resistance within swine-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates in the United States is associated with multilocus sequence type lineage. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017;83:e00756–e17. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00756-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sharma M, Nunez-Garcia J, Kearns AM, Doumith M, Butaye PR, Argudín MA, Lahuerta-Marin A, Pichon B, AbuOun M, Rogers J, Ellis RJ, Teale C, Anjum MF. Livestock-Associated Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (LA-MRSA) Clonal Complex (CC) 398 Isolated from UK Animals belong to European Lineages. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:1741. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Cuny C, Wieler LH, Witte W. Livestock-associated MRSA: the impact on humans. Antibiotics (Basel) 2015;4:521–543. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics4040521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Moon DC, Tamang MD, Nam HM, Jeong JH, Jang GC, Jung SC, Park YH, Lim SK. Identification of livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates in Korea and molecular comparison between isolates from animal carcasses and slaughterhouse workers. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2015;12:327–334. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2014.1868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lim SK, Nam HM, Jang GC, Lee HS, Jung SC, Kwak HS. The first detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 in pigs in Korea. Vet Microbiol. 2012;155:88–92. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Moon DC, Jeong SK, Hyun BH, Lim SK. Prevalence and characteristics of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates in pigs and pig farmers in Korea. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2019;16:256–261. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2018.2509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Uhlemann AC, Porcella SF, Trivedi S, Sullivan SB, Hafer C, Kennedy AD, Barbian KD, McCarthy AJ, Street C, Hirschberg DL, Lipkin WI, Lindsay JA, DeLeo FR, Lowy FD. Identification of a highly transmissible animal-independent Staphylococcus aureus ST398 clone with distinct genomic and cell adhesion properties. MBio. 2012;3:e00027–e12. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00027-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Valentin-Domelier AS, Girard M, Bertrand X, Violette J, François P, Donnio PY, Talon D, Quentin R, Schrenzel J, van der Mee-Marquet N Bloodstream Infection Study Group of the Réseau des Hygiénistes du Centre (RHC) Methicillin-susceptible ST398 Staphylococcus aureus responsible for bloodstream infections: an emerging human-adapted subclone? PLoS One. 2011;6:e28369. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Asai T, Hiki M, Baba K, Usui M, Ishihara K, Tamura Y. Presence of Staphylococcus aureus ST398 and ST9 in Swine in Japan. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2012;65:551–552. doi: 10.7883/yoken.65.551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Yan X, Yu X, Tao X, Zhang J, Zhang B, Dong R, Xue C, Grundmann H, Zhang J. Staphylococcus aureus ST398 from slaughter pigs in northeast China. Int J Med Microbiol. 2014;304:379–383. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2013.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.David MZ, Siegel J, Lowy FD, Zychowski D, Taylor A, Lee CJ, Boyle-Vavra S, Daum RS. Asymptomatic carriage of sequence type 398, spa type t571 methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus in an urban jail: a newly emerging, transmissible pathogenic strain. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51:2443–2447. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01057-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Mediavilla JR, Chen L, Uhlemann AC, Hanson BM, Rosenthal M, Stanak K, Koll B, Fries BC, Armellino D, Schilling ME, Weiss D, Smith TC, Lowy FD, Kreiswirth BN. Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus ST398, New York and New Jersey, USA. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012;18:700–702. doi: 10.3201/eid1804.111419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Stefani S, Chung DR, Lindsay JA, Friedrich AW, Kearns AM, Westh H, Mackenzie FM. Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): global epidemiology and harmonisation of typing methods. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2012;39:273–282. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2011.09.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Crisóstomo MI, Westh H, Tomasz A, Chung M, Oliveira DC, de Lencastre H. The evolution of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: similarity of genetic backgrounds in historically early methicillin-susceptible and -resistant isolates and contemporary epidemic clones. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:9865–9870. doi: 10.1073/pnas.161272898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Sieber RN, Skov RL, Nielsen J, Schulz J, Price LB, Aarestrup FM, Larsen AR, Stegger M, Larsen J. Drivers and dynamics of methicillin-resistant livestock-associated Staphylococcus aureus CC398 in pigs and humans in denmark. MBio. 2018;9:e02142-18. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02142-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Argudín MA, Tenhagen BA, Fetsch A, Sachsenröder J, Käsbohrer A, Schroeter A, Hammerl JA, Hertwig S, Helmuth R, Bräunig J, Mendoza MC, Appel B, Rodicio MR, Guerra B. Virulence and resistance determinants of German Staphylococcus aureus ST398 isolates from nonhuman sources. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77:3052–3060. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02260-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Argudín MA, Lauzat B, Kraushaar B, Alba P, Agerso Y, Cavaco L, Butaye P, Porrero MC, Battisti A, Tenhagen BA, Fetsch A, Guerra B. Heavy metal and disinfectant resistance genes among livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates. Vet Microbiol. 2016;191:88–95. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2016.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Slifierz MJ, Friendship RM, Weese JS. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in commercial swine herds is associated with disinfectant and zinc usage. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015;81:2690–2695. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00036-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


