Abstract
Pemphigus foliaceus is an autoimmune disease that is sporadic around the world but endemic in Brazil, where it is known as fogo selvagem (FS). Characterized by autoantibodies against the desmosomal cadherin desmoglein 1, FS causes painful erosions, and crusts that may be widespread. The recognition of antigens, including exposed sugar moieties, activates the complement system. Complement receptor 1 (CR1, CD35), which is responsible for the Knops blood group on erythrocytes (York and McCoy antigens), is also expressed by antigen-presenting cells. This regulates the complement system by removing opsonized antigens, blocking the final steps of the complement cascade. Membrane-bound CR1 also fosters antigen presentation to B cells, whereas soluble CR1 has anti-inflammatory properties. CR1 gene polymorphisms have been associated with susceptibility to complex diseases. In order to investigate the association of CR1 polymorphisms with FS susceptibility, we developed a multiplex sequence-specific assay to haplotype eleven polymorphisms in up to 367 FS patients and 242 controls from an endemic area and 289 from a non-endemic area. We also measured soluble CR1 (sCR1) in the serum of 53 FS patients and 27 controls and mRNA levels in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells of 63 genotyped controls. The haplotypes CR1*3B2B (with the York antigen–encoded by p.1408Met) and CR1*3A2A (with p.1208Arg) were associated with protection against FS (OR = 0.57, P = 0.027, and OR = 0.46, P = 0.014, respectively). In contrast, the CR1*1 haplotype (with the McCoy antigen – encoded by p.1590Glu) was associated with FS susceptibility (OR = 4.97, P < 0.001). Heterozygote rs12034383*A/G individuals presented higher mRNA expression than homozygotes with the G allele (P = 0.04). The lowest sCR1 levels occurred in patients with active disease before treatment (P = 0.036). Patients in remission had higher levels of sCR1 than did healthy controls (P = 0.013). Among those under treatment, patients with localized lesions also presented higher sCR1 levels than those with generalized lesions (P = 0.0073). In conclusion, the Knops blood group seems to modulate susceptibility to the disease. Furthermore, corticosteroid treatment might increase sCR1 serum levels, and higher levels may play an anti-inflammatory role in patients with FS, limiting the distribution of lesions. Based on these results, we suggest CR1 as a potential new therapeutic target for the treatment of FS.
Keywords: pemphigus foliaceus, complement receptor 1, CR1, CD35, polymorphism, York blood antigen, McCoy blood antigen, fogo selvagem
Introduction
Pemphigus foliaceus (PF) is an autoimmune blistering skin disease presenting with erosions and crusts that may be widespread and painful (1). Around the world, PF occurs sporadically, with an incidence of 0.75–5 cases/million per year (2, 3). In Brazil, it reaches up to 3% prevalence and is also known as fogo selvagem (FS, meaning “wild fire” in Portuguese) (2–6). While major immunopathological and histological characteristics are similar in both endemic and sporadic forms, the clinical presentation may differ (3, 7). The etiology of FS is little understood, but environmental factors are being considered. The bites of black mosquitoes (Simuliidae) and sand flies (Phlebotominae) are associated with an almost five times increased susceptibility to FS. Elements delivered in the saliva of these hematophagous insects are thought to trigger a cross-reaction against keratinocyte surface epitopes in genetically susceptible individuals living in endemic regions (8–10).
The intraepidermal blisters of PF are due to keratinocyte detachment, a process known as acantholysis (11). FS patients generate pathogenic IgG4 autoantibodies against desmoglein 1 (Dsg1) and occasionally and to a much lesser extent, against Dsg3, which are important structural components of desmosomes (1, 12). Altered cell-associated molecular patterns activate the complement system, and this is responsible for the recurrent observation of C3 component deposits along the basement membrane zone and in intercellular spaces of the perilesional and lesional epidermis of FS patients (13–16). Deposits of complement membrane attack complexes, in contrast, were only found in injured skin, whereas pathogenic IgG4 anti-desmoglein 1 autoantibodies—which cannot activate complement—were also abundant in apparently healthy tissue in FS patients (14, 17).
Although not required to initiate blister formation (18, 19), complement activation enhances acantholysis in cell culture (20, 21). Furthermore, FS patients with active disease present enhanced expression of the C1QA gene (an initiator molecule of the classical pathway) and increased serum levels of C3 and C-reactive protein (opsonins), of the cleaved factors resulting from the activation of the alternative pathway (Ba factor), or of the classical/lectin complement pathways (C4d factor), as well as a trend to decreased mannose-binding lectin serine protease 2 levels, reflecting activation of the lectin pathway (14, 22–24).
Complement receptor 1 (CR1, CD35) is a glycoprotein with ~200 kDa encoded by the CR1 gene (on chromosome region 1q32). The extracellular domain of the most common form of CR1 is composed of a series of 30 repeating units named short consensus repeats (SCRs). The SCRs are distributed in four long homologous repeats (LHRs A, B, C, and D), arising from duplication of a seven-SCR unit (Figure 1) (26–28). CR1 is primarily expressed in erythrocytes, B and T cells, neutrophils, monocytes, and dendritic cells, as well as in neurons, microglia, and the choroid plexus of the brain, in the membrane or in soluble form (29). The soluble CR1 (sCR1) form results from proteolytic cleavage in terminal secretory vesicles or in the cell membrane (30, 31). Both CR1 forms act to regulate complement activity by binding cleaved C3b and C4b components as well as the complement cascade initiation molecules mannose-binding lectin (MBL-2), ficolins (FCN1, FCN2, and FCN3), and C1q deposited in altered cell components or pathogens. CR1 competes with serine proteases (MASPs) for the same binding sites on the collagenous tails of MBL and FCNs, inhibiting the initiation of the lectin pathway of complement (32). Upon binding, the membrane-bound form of CR1 internalizes the opsonized elements or presents them to other immune cells, preventing the formation of the C5 convertase. This blocks the formation of the membrane attack complex (MAC). CR1 might also prevent excessive complement activation, acting as a cofactor for the Factor I-mediated cleavage of soluble/bound C3b and C4b (33). On the other hand, binding of opsonized elements fosters antigen presentation to lymphocytes, increasing antibody production, and the humoral response (29, 34). In the presence of excess interleukin 2, CR1 expressed on activated T lymphocytes generates regulatory T cells in secondary lymphoid organs, where they may interact with B cells (35). In fact, CR1 ligation inhibits B cell receptor-mediated activation and differentiation to plasma cells (36).
In a recent study by our group that encompassed polymorphisms of all genes encoding complement components, we found evidence for an association with gene variants of almost all complement elements previously detected in the epidermis or with altered serum levels in FS patients. In addition, we identified the association of four opsonin-binding complement receptors (CR1-4, encoded by CR1, CR2, ITGAM, and ITGAX) (37). Among them, we found that a CR1 haplotype with the major rs6656401*G allele was associated with increased susceptibility to FS (37). This prompted us to thoroughly investigate the CR1 gene for other polymorphisms, including those encoding blood group antigens that may affect the binding of C1q, MBL, and FCNs, as well as to measure the expression of this gene at the mRNA and soluble protein levels.
Materials and Methods
Ethics Statement
This transversal case-control study was approved by the National Committee for Ethics in Research (CONEP 02727412.4.0000.0096, protocol 505.988). All study participants were informed about the research and signed a term of informed consent.
Research Participants
For the association study, a total of 367 FS patients and 242 controls from an endemic area and 289 individuals from a non-endemic area (among accompanying persons, health workers, and other volunteers) were analyzed. The participants were recruited from four centers: Hospital Adventista do Pênfigo (Campo Grande-MS, Central Western Brazil), Lar da Caridade (Uberaba-MG, Southwestern Brazil), Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto (Ribeirão Preto-SP, Southwestern Brazil), and Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) (Curitiba-PR, South Brazil). Data for both patients and controls were collected through interviews and medical records. Inclusion criteria were: written informed consent, being a resident in the endemic region, and for the patients, FS diagnosis based on clinical evidence and positive anti-Dsg1 serology. Exclusion criteria were: consanguinity with a control or a patient and a familial history of autoimmune diseases. All subjects were classified according to ancestral origin, based on physical characteristics and self-reported ancestry, as previously described (38, 39). The demographic characteristics of the participants in this study are listed in Table 1.
Table 1.
Controls | FS patients | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Endemic n = 204 | Non-endemic n = 256 | Patients n = 265 | Localized lesions n = 44 | Generalized lesions n = 80 | |
Epidemiologic data | |||||
Male (%) | 99 (48.5) | 106 (41.4) | 121 (45.7) | 18 (40.9) | 32 (40.0) |
Average age (min-max) | 44.75 (13–86) | 33.64 (17–66) | 37.42 (12–88) | 28.5 (16–73) | 38.55 (14–85) |
Demographic data | |||||
Central-Western (%) | 177 (86.8) | 0 | 206 (77.7) | 31 (70.5) | 57 (71.3) |
Southwestern (%) | 5 (2.5) | 0 | 56 (21.1) | 12 (27.3) | 21 (26.3) |
South (%) | 22 (10.8) | 256 (100) | 3 (1.1) | 1 (2.3) | 2 (2.5) |
N, number of individuals; Central-Western, Campo Grande-MS; Southwestern, Ribeirão Preto-SP. South, Curitiba-PR.
The total number of patients with localized or generalized lesions did not sum 265 due to lack of proper diagnostic classification of some individuals.
For the analysis of sCR1 levels in serum, we selected 53 FS patients and 27 healthy controls, matched for sex, age, and previously genotyped for CR1 polymorphisms. Eighteen of the patients were in complete remission, nine were without treatment and nine were under immunosuppressive treatment; 35 patients presented with active fogo selvagem, six of whom were still untreated and 29 of whom were already being treated. Among all treated patients with known information regarding the distribution of lesions, five had localized lesions, and 21 had generalized lesions.
In order to evaluate a possible correlation between CR1 polymorphisms and mRNA levels from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), we also genotyped 158 healthy unrelated Euro-Brazilian volunteers, resident in Curitiba, Brazil, and surrounding areas. We selected 63 individuals from this group with the following inclusion criteria: no previous history of an autoimmune disease, an obvious skin disease, and presenting CR1 alleles and haplotypes associated with the disease (to quantify mRNA levels).
CR1 Genotyping
Blood was collected with anticoagulant EDTA, and DNA was extracted from PBMC as previously described, using phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (40).
We selected 11 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) based on [1] being previously associated with a disease, [2] being a tag SNP with r2 ≥ 0.8 in the European (Utah—USA), Mexican, Colombian, or Yoruba populations of the 1000 Genomes Project (41); and/or [3] by presenting a minor allele frequency higher than 0.05. The CR1 SNPs evaluated were: rs6656401*a>G (intron 4); rs3849266*c>T (intron 21); rs2274567*a>G (exon 22, p.His1208Arg); rs12034598*a>G (intron 24), rs1746659*t>A (intron 24), rs3737002*c>T (exon 26, p.Thr1408Met, responsible for the York blood group antigen); rs11118131*c>T (intron 26); rs11118167*t>C (intron 28); rs17047660*a>G (exon 29, p.Lys1590Glu, responsible for the McCoy blood group antigen); rs4844610*a>C (intron 37); rs12034383*g>A (intron 37).
We developed two multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction-Sequence Specific Primer (PCR-SSP) reactions for simultaneous identification of four SNPs and two simple PCR-SSPs for one SNP each. All PCRs co-amplified a Human Growth Hormone (HGH) or Human Leukocyte E antigen (HLA-E) fragment as internal control. The sequences of specific and control primers are shown in Table 2. All reactions were carried out in a final volume of 8 μl, containing 20 ng of genomic DNA, 0.2 mM each of dNTP and 1x Coral Buffer (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, USA) (Supplementary Table 1). Thermal cycling began with 95°C for 5 min, followed by 33 (PCR-SSP-1) or 30 (PCR-SSP-2, 3 and 4) cycles, for which each cycle began with 94°C for 20 s and ended with 72°C (extension step) for 40 s (Supplementary Table 1). We submitted the amplified fragments to an electrophoretic run on 1% agarose gel, stained with Sybersafe (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, USA).
Table 2.
Forward Primers | Reverse primers | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNP | Localization | 5′ → 3′ Sequence | SNP | Localization | 5′ → 3′ Sequence | Fragment | |
Simple PCR 1 | rs6656401 | Intron 4 | CTCTGTCTCCATCTTCTCA | Generic Primer | Intron 4 | CATAGTTGTAGTTGGGGATTG | 257 bp |
CTCTGTCTCCATCTTCTCG | |||||||
Multi 1 | rs3849266 | Intron 21 | CTGATGGCTTGGGGTAT | rs2274567 | Exon 22 | CTCAATCTGCATTGATCCAC | 667 bp |
CTGATGGCTTGGGGTAC | CTCAATCTGCATTGATCCAT | ||||||
Simple PCR 1 | rs12034598 | Intron 24 | GCCTGGCATCATCAAGAAAA | rs1746659 | Intron 24 | GGTTAGTGTTCAGAGGCAGA | 1068 bp |
GCCTGGCATCATCAAGAAAG | GGTTAGTGTTCAGAGGCAGT | ||||||
Multi 2 | rs3737002 | Exon 26 | CCATTTGCCAGTCCTAC | rs11118131 | Intron 26 | CAAGAAGAAGGGGTGATG | 457 bp |
CCATTTGCCAGTCCTAT | CAAGAAGAAGGGGTGATA | ||||||
Multi 2 | rs11118167 | Intron 28 | GCCAATATGTGAATATTATTATCTTAT | rs17047660 | Exon 29 | TTCTGGAGCTGTGCATTT | 746 bp |
GCCAATATGTGAATATTATTATCTTAC | TTCTGGAGCTGTGCATTC | ||||||
Multi 1 | rs4844610 | Intron 37 | CTACACAAAACAGCCTTGTA | rs12034383 | Intron 37 | AGATGTCCATGCCTTAAC | 1080 bp |
CTACACAAAACAGCCTTGTC | AGATGTCCATGCCTTAAT | ||||||
Control primers | |||||||
Simple PCR 1, 2 and muli 1 | HGHf | TGCCTTCCCAACCATTCCCTTA | HGHr | CCACTCACGGATTTCTGTTGTGTTTC | 431 bp | ||
Multi 2 | HLA-Ef | CGGGACTGACTAAGGGGCGG | HLA-Er | GTAGCCCTGTGGACCCTCTTAC | 324 bp |
In bold: variant nucleotide. SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; bp, base pairs; HGH, human growth hormone; HLA-E, Human leukocyte E antigen; f, forward; r, reverse; Multi, multiplex PCR-SSP.
Genotyping of the rs6656401, rs3849266, rs3737002, rs11118131, rs11118167, rs17047660, and rs12034383 polymorphisms was performed with the iPLEX platform of the MassARRAY system (Agena Bioscience, San Diego, USA) at the Insitut für Klinische Molekularbiologie (IKMB), Christian-Albrechts-Universität, Kiel, Germany (42), in order to technically validate the results obtained by PCR-SSP. Genotypes were called using the software MassARRAY Typer (v4.0) (Agena Bioscience, San Diego, USA) with standard settings. The sequences of specific and control primers are shown in Table 3.
Table 3.
SNP | Localization | 5′ → 3′ Forward Primer Sequence | 5′ → 3′ Reverse Primer Sequence | 5′ → 3′ Extended Primer Sequence |
---|---|---|---|---|
rs6656401 | Intron 4 | ACGTTGGATGGCATCATTTCCTTCTCTGTC | ACGTTGGATGGACAGAAGAGCAAAGGACAC | GTTTTTTCTCTGTCTCCATCTTCTC |
rs3849266 | Intron 21 | ACGTTGGATGATAACTCGCCCCTCAATCTG | ACGTTGGATGGCAGGCAACTGTGTTTATAC | ACCTCAATCTGCATTGATCCA |
rs3737002 | Exon 26 | ACGTTGGATGTCCAGGTCACTGTAAAACCC | ACGTTGGATGAAGATGTCCCGACTGGAAAC | CTATCAGTTTCCATTTGCCAGTCCTA |
rs11118131 | Intron 26 | ACGTTGGATGGATGTCTATATTTGCCCAAG | ACGTTGGATGGCATCTAGTCAAGGTTCAGG | GGTATAAAGGAAAGGATGGTCTTGTA |
rs11118167 | Intron 28 | ACGTTGGATGATGTGTGTAGTCACTTAGCC | ACGTTGGATGATAATGGCAGATTTAAGGGC | GCCAATATGTGAATATTATTATCTTA |
rs17047660 | Exon 29 | ACGTTGGATGCAAGTTGGTGTTTGGAGCAG | ACGTTGGATGGCATTTTCAACTTCTGGAGC | TCACCTTCTGGAGCTGTGCATT |
SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism.
sCR1 Quantification
We measured sCR1 levels in the serum (collected without anticoagulant) by using a SEB123Hu ELISA kit (USCN Life Science Inc., Wuhan, China) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Anti-Dsg1 and anti-Dsg3 levels were previously measured using commercial ELISA kits (RG-M7593-D and RG-7680-EC-D, respectively) (MBL, Woburn, USA) (43).
mRNA Quantification
Total RNA was isolated from PBMC lysed in TRIzol (Ambion, Austin, USA) and reverse-transcribed with a High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, USA). Gene expression levels were quantified by qPCR using TaqMan (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, USA) chemistry for the CR1 (Hs00559348_m1, the most common CR1 transcript) and the housekeeping Glucuronidase Beta (GUSB) gene (4333767F). All assays were performed in triplicate, and the relative mRNA levels were normalized for mRNA expression of the GUSB gene. Cq values (threshold cycle) were calculated using the Viia 7 Software v1.2 Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, USA), and gene expression was calculated via the comparative Cq method 2-ΔΔCq (44).
Statistical and Bioinformatics Analysis
We obtained allele, genotype and two-SNP haplotype frequencies by direct counting, and the hypothesis of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was calculated with the exact test of Guo & Thompson. We also compared haplotype distribution between the investigated groups, using the exact test of population differentiation of Raymond and Rousset. All tests were performed in Arlequin v.5.1, a population genetics software package (45).
We reconstructed extended haplotypes based on linkage disequilibrium (LD) and phase information about the two-SNP haplotypes obtained by PCR-SSP amplification, compared the results with the haplotypes estimated using the EM algorithm (Expectation-Maximization) implemented in PLINK software (46), and found 2.9% of haplotypes with discrepant results in accordance with the literature (47). We also used PLINK for analysis of possible SNP interactions and evaluated LD with Haploview 4.2 (48). We used Mega Software v.6 to name the haplotypes according to the phylogenetic nomenclature suggested by the literature (49) and adapted them for recombinant haplotypes (Figure 2). We further compared the distribution of polymorphisms and haplotypes in patients and controls adjusted for the proportion of ancestry groups using the Fisher exact test in the online software VassarStats (VassarStats: Website for Statistical Computation; available at: http://vassarstats.net). We adjusted all associations for the possible effects of confounding factors (age, sex, ancestry group) by logistic regression in total patient and control groups using the software STATA v.9.2 (Statacorps, Lakeway Drive, USA). To check for false discovery rate, we used the correction of Benjamini and Hochberg (50) on all significant results (“q” values lower than 0.05 were considered significant).
Normality tests (D'Agostino & Pearson and Shapiro-Wilk), correlation tests (Spearman), and non-parametric comparisons of CR1 mRNA and sCR1 levels (Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests) were carried out using GraphPad Prism v.5.01 (GraphPad Software). The use of different dosages of corticosteroids was evaluated in the group of patients undergoing treatment in order to verify whether there were differences between them.
To predict the functional effects of associated SNPs, we explored data from the ENCODE project contained in the Regulome-DB (51) and Haploreg (52) databases. To evaluate the effect of non-synonymous SNPs, we used Polyphen-2 (53) and SNiPA (54).
Results
CR1 Polymorphisms and Susceptibility to Fogo Selvagem
None of the groups had genotype distributions that deviated from those predicted under Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. The allele frequencies for each SNP did not differ between controls and the Iberian population from the 1,000 Genomes Project. In contrast, CR1 haplotype distributions differed between the endemic and non-endemic controls, even within each ancestry group (P < 0.0001). This led us to compare the patient group with endemic and non-endemic control groups separately. We found differences between the allelic distributions of isolated SNPs of non-endemic controls and patients.
Comparing these two groups (Table 4, Supplementary Table 2), we found evidence for a disease association with the minor allele of rs17047660*G in exon 29. This variant encodes p.1590Glu, which is responsible for positive McCoy blood group antigen. Its allelic frequency was higher among FS patients [OR = 3.77 (95%CI = 1.52–9.35), q = 0.005]. rs17047660*A/G heterozygote individuals were more frequent among those with generalized lesions [OR = 3.06 (95%CI = 1.09–8.56), q = 0.025]. The rs3849266 within intron 21 occurs in a region with enhancer histone H3K4me1 marks, binding at least 23 different regulatory proteins, according to the ENCODE Database. rs3849266*C/T presented an association with increased susceptibility to the disease [OR = 1.54 (95%CI = 1.03–2.31), q = 0.030]. We also found an additive effect of carrying the “wild type” haplotype with rs3737002*C in exon 26 (p.1408Thr, York negative) and rs11118131*C in intron 26 [OR = 1.5 (95%CI = 1.00–2.26), q = 0.049] with susceptibility to severe FS. The minor allele rs2274567*G, encoding p.1208Arg, occurred more frequently among non-endemic controls than among patients [OR = 0.58 (95%CI = 0.38–0.87), q = 0.035].
Table 4.
Controls | FS patients | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CR1 genetic variants | Iberian n = 214 (%) | Endemic control n (%) | Non-endemic control n (%) | Patient n (%) | Localized lesion n (%) | Generalized lesion n (%) | Patient vs. Non-endemic control | |
rs6656401 A>G | n = 203 | n = 234 | n = 265 | N = 44 | N = 81 | OR [95% CI] | P (q) value | |
A | 27 (12.60) | 46 (11.33) | 63 (13.46) | 59 (11.13) | 8 (9.09) | 20 (12.35) | ||
AA | 2 (1.90) | 2 (0.99) | 1 (0.43) | 2 (0.75) | 1 (2.27) | 0 | ||
AG | 23 (21.50) | 42 (20.69) | 61 (26.07) | 55 (20.75) | 6 (13.64) | 20 (24.69) | ||
GG | 82 (76.60) | 159 (78.33) | 172 (73.50) | 208 (78.49) | 37 (84.09) | 61 (75.31) | ||
A+ | 44 (21.67) | 62 (26.50) | 57 (21.51) | 7 (15.91) | 20 (24.69) | |||
rs3849266 C>T | n = 182 | n = 238 | n = 233 | n = 41 | n = 76 | |||
T | 68 (31.80) | 103 (28.30) | 122 (25.63) | 125 (26.82) | 19 (23.17) | 38 (25.00) | ||
CC | 50 (46.70) | 90 (49.45) | 134 (56.30) | 120 (51.50) | 24 (58.54) | 41 (53.95) | ||
CT | 46 (43.00) | 81 (44.51) | 86 (36.13) | 101 (43.35) | 15 (36.59) | 32 (42.11) | 1.54 [1.03–2.31] | 0.036 (0.030) |
TT | 11 (10.30) | 11 (6.04) | 18 (7.56) | 12 (5.15) | 2 (4.88) | 3 (3.95) | ||
T+ | 92 (50.55) | 104 (43.70) | 113 (48.50) | 17 (41.46) | 35 (46.05) | |||
rs2274567 A>G (p.His1208Arg) | n = 148 | n = 232 | n = 158 | n = 28 | n = 54 | |||
G | 36 (16.80) | 65 (21.96) | 138 (29.74) | 73 (23.10) | 15 (26.79) | 22 (20.37) | 0.70 [0.51–0.98] | 0.048 (0.035) |
AA | 73 (68.20) | 94 (63.51) | 110 (47.41) | 93 (58.86) | 14 (50.00) | 32 (59.26) | ||
AG | 32 (29.90) | 43 (29.05) | 106 (45.69) | 57 (36.08) | 13 (46.43) | 22 (40.74) | ||
GG | 2 (1.90) | 11 (7.43) | 16 (6.90) | 8 (5.06) | 1 (3.57) | 0 | ||
G+ | 54 (36.49) | 122 (52.59) | 65 (41.14) | 14 (50.00) | 22 (40.74) | |||
rs3737002 C>T (p.Thr1408Met) | n = 192 | n = 246 | n = 253 | n = 43 | n = 79 | |||
T | 68 (31.80) | 109 (28.39) | 134 (27.24) | 127 (25.10) | 18 (20.93) | 36 (22.78) | ||
CC | 50 (46.70) | 103 (53.65) | 133 (54.07) | 144 (56.92) | 27 (62.79) | 47 (59.49) | ||
CT | 46 (43.00) | 69 (35.94) | 92 (37.40) | 91 (35.97) | 14 (32.56) | 28 (35.44) | ||
TT | 11 (10.30) | 20 (10.42) | 21 (8.54) | 18 (7.11) | 2 (4.65) | 4 (5.06) | ||
T+ | 89 (46.35) | 113 (45.93) | 109 (43.08) | 16 (37.21) | 32 (40.51) | |||
rs11118131 C>T | n = 177 | n = 208 | n = 225 | n = 49 | n = 71 | |||
T | 35 (16.40) | 75 (21.19) | 103 (24.76) | 89 (19.78) | 15 (19.23) | 26 (18.31) | 0.74 [0.54–1.03] | 0.08 |
CC | 74 (69.20) | 114 (64.41) | 120 (57.69) | 147 (65.33) | 25 (64.10) | 45 (63.38) | ||
CT | 31 (29.00) | 51 (28.81) | 73 (35.10) | 67 (29.78) | 13 (33.33) | 26 (36.62) | ||
TT | 2 (1.90) | 12 (6.78) | 15 (7.21) | 11 (4.89) | 1 (2.56) | 0 | ||
T+ | 63 (35.59) | 88 (42.31) | 78 (34.67) | 14 (35.90) | 26 (36.62) | |||
rs11118167 T>C | n = 179 | n = 232 | n = 234 | n = 41 | n = 77 | |||
C | 35 (16.40) | 65 (18.16) | 91 (19.61) | 82 (17.52) | 18 (21.95) | 28 (18.18) | ||
CC | 2 (1.90) | 4 (2.23) | 5 (2.16) | 7 (2.99) | 2 (4.88) | 2 (2.60) | ||
CT | 31 (29.00) | 57 (31.84) | 81 (34.91) | 68 (29.06) | 14 (34.15) | 24 (31.17) | ||
TT | 74 (69.20) | 118 (65.92) | 146 (62.93) | 159 (67.95) | 25 (60.98) | 51 (66.23) | ||
C+ | 61 (34.08) | 86 (37.07) | 75 (32.05) | 16 (39.02) | 26 (33.77) | |||
rs17047660 A>G (p.Lys1590Glu) | n = 185 | n = 235 | n = 247 | n = 42 | n = 77 | |||
G | 3 (1.40) | 10 (2.70) | 6 (1.28) | 23 (4.66) | 4 (4.76) | 9 (5.84) | 3.77 [1.52–9.35] | 0.002 (0.005) |
AA | 104 (97.20) | 175 (94.59) | 229 (97.45) | 224 (90.69) | 38 (90.48) | 68 (88.31) | ||
AG | 3 (2.80) | 10 (5.41) | 6 (2.55) | 23 (9.31) | 4 (9.52) | 9 (11.69) | 3.56 [1.37–9.27] | 0.009 (0.015) |
GG | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.38 [1.01–5.62] | 0.048 (0.035) |
G+ | 10 (5.41) | 6 (2.55) | 23 (9.31) | 4 (9.52) | 9 (11.69) | 2.93 [1.18–7.24] | 0.020 (0.020) | |
rs4844610 A>C | n = 203 | n = 234 | n = 265 | n = 44 | n = 81 | |||
A | 23 (10.70) | 47 (11.58) | 63 (13.46) | 59 (11.13) | 8 (9.09) | 20 (12.35) | ||
AA | 1 (0.90) | 2 (0.99) | 1 (0.43) | 2 (0.75) | 1 (2.27) | 0 | ||
AC | 21 (19.60) | 43 (21.18) | 61 (26.07) | 55 (20.75) | 6 (13.64) | 20 (24.69) | ||
CC | 85 (79.40) | 158 (77.83) | 172 (73.50) | 208 (78.49) | 37 (84.09) | 61 (75.31) | ||
A+ | 45 (22.17) | 62 (26.50) | 57 (21.51) | 7 (15.91) | 20 (24.69) | |||
rs12034383 G>A | n = 191 | n = 242 | n = 252 | n = 43 | n = 78 | |||
G | 71 (33.20) | 188 (49.21) | 231 (47.73) | 249 (49.40) | 46 (53.49) | 82 (52.56) | 3.95 [1.08–14.34] | 0.029 |
AA | 44 (41.10) | 50 (26.18) | 70 (28.93) | 69 (27.38) | 10 (23.26) | 17 (21.79) | ||
AG | 55 (51.40) | 94 (49.21) | 113 (46.69) | 117 (46.43) | 20 (46.51) | 40 (51.28) | ||
GG | 8 (7.50) | 47 (24.61) | 59 (24.38) | 66 (26.19) | 13 (30.23) | 21 (26.92) | ||
G+ | 141 (73.82) | 172 (71.07) | 183 (72.62) | 33 (76.74) | 61 (78.21) |
All genotype distributions were in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. Associations were corrected for age, sex, and, if independent, for ancestry group distribution. P values were checked for false discovery rate using the correction of Benjamini and Hochberg (“q” statistical significance level remained 0.05). n, number of individuals; OR, odds ratio in binary logistic regression; CI, confidence interval; q, Benjamini-Hochberg corrected p-value.
There was strong pairwise LD between the SNPs in intron 21 (rs3849266), exon 22 (rs2274567), exon 26 (rs3737002), and intron 37 (rs12034383) (Supplementary Figure 1). Based on LD and phase information, we haplotyped all SNPs in a subset of 146 FS patients and 126 controls from an endemic area and 156 from a non-endemic area and identified 21 haplotypes (Figure 2). In fact, we obtained the most conspicuous association results with CR1 haplotypes (Table 5), revealing synergistic, additive/epistatic effects between variants located on the same DNA string. The carrier status of the *3B2B haplotype (GTHMCTKCA), the most common haplotype encoding the York blood group antigen (rs3737002, p.1408Met), protects against FS [OR = 0.57 (95%CI = 0.35–0.93), q = 0.042] as well as against the localized form of the disease [OR = 0.25 (95%CI = 0.089–0.72), q = 0.01]. In contrast with all other results, this association agreed for comparisons with both endemic and non-endemic controls. A similar protective effect was observed from carrying the *3A2A (GCRTTTKCG) haplotype, presenting p.1208Arg and p.1408Thr [OR = 0.46 (95%CI = 0.25–0.85), q = 0.033]. This protective effect agreed with the aforementioned association results of rs2274567 (p.His1208Arg). In contrast, the frequency of the *1 haplotype (GCHTCTKCG) was higher among FS patients with both localized and generalized distributions of cutaneous lesions than in controls (OR = 5.50 [95%CI = 1.84–16.45], q = 0.016 and OR = 4.33 [95%CI = 1.74–10.77], q = 0.002, respectively).
Table 5.
Phylogenetic Haplotype | Nucleotide sequence | Patient groups n/n total (%) | Control groups n/n total (%) | OR | 95% CI | P (q) | Model |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
*3B2B | GTHMCTKCA | Patient 57/292 (19.5) |
Endemic 66/252 (26.2) |
0.57 | 0.35–0.93 | 0.027 (0.042) | Dominant |
Localized lesion 5/25 (20) |
Endemic 66/252 (26.2) |
0.25 | 0.089–0.72 | 0.010 (0.025) | Dominant | ||
Localized lesion 5/25 (20) |
Endemic 66/252 (26.2) |
0.26 | 0.093–0.72 | 0.010 (0.029) | Additive | ||
Localized lesion 5/25 (20) |
Non-endemic 71/312 (22.8) |
0.35 | 0.12–1.00 | 0.052 (0.050) | Dominant | ||
Localized lesion 5/25 (20) |
Non-endemic 71/312 (22.8) |
0.35 | 0.12–0.99 | 0.049 (0.045) | Additive | ||
*1 | GCHTCTKCG | Patient 36/292 (12.3) |
Non-endemic 32/252 (12.7) |
4.97 | 2.13–11.59 | <103 (0.004) | Dominant |
Patient 36/292 (12.3) |
Non-endemic 32/252 (12.7) |
4.76 | 2.08–10.87 | <103 (0.008) | Additive | ||
Generalized lesion 9/52 (17.3) |
Non-endemic 32/252 (12.7) |
4.33 | 1.74–10.77 | 0.002 (0.012) | Dominant and additive | ||
Localized lesion 3/25 (12) |
Non-endemic 32/252 (12.7) |
5.50 | 1.84–16.45 | 0.002 (0.016) | Dominant | ||
Localized lesion 3/25 (12) |
Non-endemic 32/252 (12.7) |
5.32 | 1.85–15.24 | 0.002 (0.021) | Additive | ||
*3A2A | GCRTTTKCG | Patient 25/292 (8.6) | Non-endemic 43/252 (12.8) | 0.46 | 0.25–0.85 | 0.014 (0.033) | Dominant |
Patient 25/292 (8.6) | Non-endemic 43/252 (12.8) | 0.49 | 0.27–0.89 | 0.020 (0.037) | Additive |
Haplotypes represented nine investigated CR1 SNPs (rs6656401, rs3849266, rs2274567, rs3737002, rs11118131, rs11118167, rs17047660, rs4844610, and rs12034383). One-letter, underlined amino acid symbols are given instead of nucleotide substitutions, where appropriate. n, number of chromosomes; OR, odds ratio, corrected for age, ancestry group, and sex distribution; CI, confidence interval.
Fisher's exact test. Dominant model: individuals with the haplotype were more frequent in one of the groups, regardless of whether homozygous or heterozygous. Additive model: homozygote individuals were overrepresented in one of the groups, followed by heterozygotes, meaning that the haplotype presents an additive effect for increasing resistance/protection against the disease.
sCR1 Levels and Susceptibility to Fogo Selvagem
sCR1 levels differed according to treatment and disease manifestations but not according to the genotypes of the investigated SNPs and haplotypes (Figure 3). Patients in complete remission on treatment had higher sCR1 levels (median 1.82 ng/mL) than did controls and patients that had not yet initiated therapy (medians 1.23 and 0.61 ng/mL, P = 0.013 and 0.036, respectively). On the other hand, there was no difference between sCR1 levels in controls and patients with active fogo selvagem on treatment (medians 1.2 ng/mL vs. 1.39 ng/mL, respectively, P = 0.188). However, those with localized lesions revealed higher sCR1 levels than did patients with generalized lesions (medians 2.39 ng/mL vs. 1.24 ng/mL, respectively, P = 0.0073). The sCR1 levels of patients with localized lesions on immunosuppressive treatment were also significantly higher than in controls (P = 0.0112). Of note, no difference in sCR1 levels was found between patients treated with low and high corticosteroid doses (P = 0.1897, data not shown).
CR1 mRNA Expression Levels
One out of eleven CR1 SNPs analyzed (rs12034383) was associated with differential mRNA expression levels. Controls with the rs12034383*A/G genotype had higher mRNA levels than controls with the rs12034383*G/G genotype (median fold changes 0.96 vs. 0.62, respectively, P = 0.04) (Figure 4). Carriers of the protective GTHMCTKCA haplotype, which includes the rs12034383*A allele, presented instead lower mRNA expression (P = 0.03) (Figure 5).
Discussion
CR1 plays a major role in inhibiting the complement system, removing immune complexes, and activating B cells, important events that are deregulated in autoimmune diseases (35, 55, 56). Polymorphisms that alter CR1 gene expression or protein activity are also common worldwide (57–60) and have been associated with different infectious, autoimmune, and neurological/neurodegenerative diseases (61–67). Those in exon 29 encode antigens of the Knops blood group system, the 22nd system recognized by the International Society of Blood Transfusion (68): e.g., rs3737002 (p.Thr1408Met) defines the York blood antigen and rs17047660 (p.Lys1590Glu), the McCoy blood antigen (69, 70). These polymorphisms may modulate the success of Plasmodium falciparum and Leishmania major, as well as mycobacteria that invade erythrocytes and macrophages, respectively (71–75). Most of the time, however, disease associations are related to complement subversion/deregulation and consequent alterations in phagocytosis and cytokine release, even in infectious diseases (29, 76–78). For example, in HIV infection, CR1 molecules expressed on erythrocytes bind C3b-opsonized HIV particles. They act as cofactors for factor I conversion of C3b to inactivated iC3b. This allows the virus to survive anti-retroviral therapy and spread as iC3b-opsonized particles, captured by CR2 on B cells, and presented to other lymphocytes (79). In systemic lupus erythematosus, a low CR1 density on neutrophils and other phagocytes causes excessive C3 activation, the release of proinflammatory cytokines, and immune-complex overload (80–82). The risk for Alzheimer's disease increases with the preferential, low expression of a long CR1 isoform, which is ineffective in the removal of beta-amyloid plaques (83–86). Furthermore, CR1 polymorphisms also modulate the response to eculizumab therapy, which targets complement protein C5 (87).
Here, the York blood group, encoded by the CR1*3B2B haplotype, was associated with higher protection against FS. The p.1408Met amino acid substitution (rs3737002*T) is responsible for this antigen and is considered as “probably damaging” (a Polyphen-2 score of 0.9 or higher and a CADD score of 19.52). This substitution modifies the first SCR in the LHR-D module (SCR 22), responsible for the recognition of the initiation molecules of the classical (C1q) and lectin (MBL and FCNs) pathways, and may reduce the recognition of IgG1-bound C1q as well as of MBL/FCNs (32) bound to exposed glycosilated/acetylated residues on desmosomes and epithelial cells, decreasing internalization of neoantigens by antigen-presenting cells (Figure 6).
As expected, the most ancestral *1 haplotype, encoding p.1408Thr, seems to increase susceptibility to FS. Interestingly, although this association was found by comparing patients with non-endemic controls, a CR1 haplotype with p.1408Thr was found to increase FS susceptibility 1.4x within the endemic population in our previous study (37). Furthermore, the same haplotype has recently been associated with increased susceptibility to the more severe multibacillary clinical forms of leprosy (25).
On the other hand, the p.1408Met amino acid substitution was also recently associated with susceptibility to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (88). Affected patients present an increase of serum proteins of the complement cascade and higher complement activation in the lung (89). The same allele was also reported to increase the susceptibility to late-onset Alzheimer's disease in Han Chinese (90). Compared to the York antigen, the opposite is expected to occur with the amino acid substitution that creates the McCoy “b” antigen in SCR25, namely p.Lys1590Glu (rs17047660*G). This SNP is also deemed to be damaging (although with a low Polyphen score: 0.597) or deleterious, according to SIFT (score of 0.02). It increases the amount of glutamic acid residues in a sequence of only 10 residues, strengthening the negative charge already provided by Glu at the 1595 and 1597 positions and thus most probably increasing the affinity of this LHR-D domain for C1q/MBL/FCNs (91). This could explain the association found with increased susceptibility to FS, since it could potentially increase the capture of complement-opsonized elements, their internalization, and consequent B cell activation (Figure 6). The association found with the McCoy antigen (p.1590Glu), however, did not resist correction for demographic factors, which may stem from its higher frequency in African-derived populations and the small sample size of this study. Interestingly, homozygosity for p.1590Glu was also associated with higher susceptibility to repetitive malaria-associated seizures in patients with cerebral malaria (66). The susceptibility associations found for the intronic polymorphisms rs6656401*G and rs3849266*T are in accordance with our previous results (37), but the latter may also result from strong linkage disequilibrium with rs3737002.
Last, but not least, we found a protective association with the *3A2A haplotype, containing the p.1208Arg (rs2274567*G) amino acid substitution. Among the investigated SNPs, this allele was, as expected, also associated with FS resistance. However, both associations only occurred when comparing patients with non-endemic controls. Thus, we recommend caution in interpreting these results until they are replicated in an independent sample.
In accordance with the proposed anti-inflammatory role of the York antigen in disease resistance, we found an association of higher levels of sCR1, a molecule known for its anti-inflammatory properties (92), with less severe clinical presentation of FS, disease remission, and corticoid therapy. This leads us to suggest that sCR1 plays a protective role in the evolution of the disease. The soluble CR1 molecule shares all LHR domains with exosomal-bound CR1 and cell membrane-bound CR1, as well as all functions mediated by LHRs A-C, including the ability to cleave C4b, accelerating the decay of C3 and C5 convertases, and to cleave C3b, reducing opsonization and phagocytosis (27, 93). Nevertheless, sCR1 and exosomal-bound CR1 are unable to mediate the LHR-D-mediated internalization of opsonized complexes by phagocytes, thus acting as a “sink” for initiation molecules of the complement cascade and inhibiting both complement activation and complement-driven phagocytosis (92). Taking into account that human sCR1 has been demonstrated to reduce acute inflammation and autoimmunity, even preventing disease progression in a rat arthritis model (94, 95), and as the potential application of sCR1 in therapeutic settings has been shown (96), its role in susceptibility to pemphigus and its clinical evolution might be highly relevant. A longitudinal follow-up study would be necessary to find out whether patients with localized lesions that have progressed to the generalized form also present a decline in sCR1 concentration. In the present study, CR1 genotypes were not correlated with sCR1 serum levels, which might rely on the fact that the sCR1 form does not result from alternative splicing of the gene but from proteolytic cleavage (31).
CR1 gene expression was higher in healthy individuals with the genotype A/G (rs12034383) than in G/G homozygotes. This latter genotype is also associated with impaired removal of amyloid Aß in the cerebrospinal fluid of Alzheimer patients compared with A/A homozygotes (83). Interestingly, the recombinant *1.3B2B (GCHMCTKCA) haplotype, containing the proposed protective York antigen (p.1408Met), was associated with lower gene expression, lending support to the hypothesis that low CR1 levels would protect against the production of autoantibodies, as previously discussed.
In conclusion, our data lead us to suggest that CR1 polymorphisms of the Knops blood group modulate susceptibility to FS. Furthermore, higher sCR1 levels may limit FS lesions and promote/accelerate disease remission. CR1 may thus be regarded as a candidate for new therapeutic interventions in the disease.
Data Availability Statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this manuscript will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation, to any qualified researcher.
Ethics Statement
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by The National Committee for Ethics in Research (CONEP 02727412.4.0000.0096, protocol 505.988). Written informed consent to participate in this study was provided by the participants' legal guardian/next of kin.
Author Contributions
AB administered the project and supervised this work. AB and LO contributed to the conception of the work and curated and analyzed the data. LO, GK, AS, RN, TF, AF, and MW performed the investigation. CC obtained and prepared samples. LO and GK further provided methodological input by developing the multiplex PCR-SSP method used in this study. MP-E provided the samples, and ES and HB provided resources for analysis. AB, MP-E, ES, and HB acquired the funding. LO drafted the manuscript, which was further edited by AB. All authors revised the work critically for intellectual content and approved the final version of the work.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
We thank the patients and healthy controls for volunteering for this study, and the staff of the Hospital Adventista do Pênfigo, Lar da Caridade (Uberaba, MG), Hospital das Clínicas at the Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, and Hospital de Clínicas at the Federal University of Paraná for their support. Deep thanks also to the staff of the Laboratório de Genética Molecular Humana/UFPR and to Mariana Basso Spadoni, Gabriel Adelman Cipolla, Liana Alves de Oliveira, and Danillo Gardenal Augusto for technical assistance and helpful discussions.
Footnotes
Funding. This work was supported by grants from the following funding agencies: Fundação Araucária (FA protocol 39894.413.43926.1904/2013), Programa de Apoio a Núcleos de Excelência (PRONEX-protocol 24652) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq protocol 470483/2014-8). LO, GK, TF, and CC received a scholarship from Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES). TF received a scholarship under the International Sandwich Doctorate Program (PDSE) from CAPES (PDSE process 88881.132221/2016-01) and housing assistance from the German exchange program (DAAD). ES and HB were supported by general grants from the Schleswig-Holstein Cluster of Excellence Inflammation at Interfaces (EXC 306/2).
Supplementary Material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2019.02585/full#supplementary-material
References
- 1.Schmidt E, Kasperkiewicz M, Joly P. Pemphigus. Lancet. (2019) 394:882–94. 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31778-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Meyer N, Misery L. Geoepidemiologic considerations of auto-immune pemphigus. Autoimmun Rev. (2010) 9:A379–82. 10.1016/j.autrev.2009.10.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Alpsoy E, Akman-Karakas A, Uzun S. Geographic variations in epidemiology of two autoimmune bullous diseases: pemphigus and bullous pemphigoid. Arch Dermatol Res. (2015) 307:291. 10.1007/s00403-014-1531-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Castro R, Roscoe J, Sampaio S. Brazilian pemphigus foliaceus. Clin Dermatol. (1983) 1:22–41. 10.1016/0738-081X(83)90021-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bastuji-Garin S, Souissi R, Blum L, Turki H, Nouira R, Jomaa B, et al. Comparative epidemiology of pemphigus in Tunisia and France: unusual incidence of pemphigus foliaceus in young Tunisian women. J Invest Dermatol. (1995) 104:302–5. 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12612836 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Diaz L, Sampaio SA, Rivitti E, Martins C, Cunha P, Lombardi C, et al. Endemic pemphigus foliaceus. (Fogo Selvagem) II. Current and historic epidemiologic studies. J Invest Dermatol. (1989) 92:4–12. 10.1111/1523-1747.ep13070394 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Baum S, Sakka N, Artsi O, Trau H, Barzilai A. Diagnosis and classification of autoimmune blistering diseases. Autoimmun Rev. (2014) 13:482–9. 10.1016/j.autrev.2014.01.047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lombardi C, Borges PC, Chaul A, Sampaio SA, Rivitti E, Friedman H, et al. Environmental risk factors in the endemic pemphigus foliaceus. (fogo selvagem). J Invest Dermatol. (1992) 98:847–5. 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12456932 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Vernal S, Pepinelli M, Casanova C, Goulart TM, Kim O, Paula NA De, et al. Insights into the epidemiological link between biting flies and pemphigus foliaceus in southeastern Brazil. Acta Tropica. (2017) 176:455–62. 10.1016/j.actatropica.2017.09.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Qian Y, Culton DA, Jeong JS, Trupiano N, Valenzuela JG, Diaz LA. Non-infectious environmental antigens as a trigger for the initiation of an autoimmune skin disease. Autoimmun Rev. (2016) 15:923–30. 10.1016/j.autrev.2016.07.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Amagai M, Stanley JR. Desmoglein as a target in skin disease and beyond. J Invest Dermatol. (2012) 132:776–84. 10.1038/jid.2011.390 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Culton DA, Qian Y, Li N, Rubenstein D, Aoki V, Filhio GH, et al. Advances in pemphigus and its endemic pemphigus foliaceus. (Fogo Selvagem) phenotype: a paradigm of human autoimmunity. J Autoimmun. (2008) 31:311–24. 10.1016/j.jaut.2008.08.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Messias IT, von Kuster LC, Santamaria J, Kajdacsy-Balla A. Complement and antibody deposition in Brazilian pemphigus foliaceus and correlation of disease activity with circulating antibodies. Arch Dermatol. (1988) 124:1664–8. 10.1001/archderm.124.11.1664 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pegas JRP, dos Reis VMS. Direct immunofluorescence on uninvolved, lesional and perilesional skin in patients with endemic pemphigus foliaceus. (fogo selvagem). Med Sci Monitor. (2004) 10:CR657–61. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Odo M, Rodrigues R, Miyauchi L. Direct immunofluorescence in skin biopsy of Brazilian pemphigus foliaceus. An Bras Dermatol. (1981) 56:1–5. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hernandez C, Amagai M, Chan L. Pemphigus foliaceus : preferential binding of IgGl and C3 at the upper epidermis. Br J Dermatol. (1997) 136:249–52. 10.1046/j.1365-2133.1997.d01-1180.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Abreu-Velez AM, Upegui-Zapata YA, Valencia-Yepes CA, Upegui-Quiceno E, Mesa-Herrera N-R, Jiménez-Echavarria AM, et al. Membrane attack complex. (C5b-9 complex or Mac), is strongly present in lesional skin from patients with endemic pemphigus foliaceus in El Bagre, Colombia. J Cuton Pathol. (2019) 1–5. 10.1111/cup.13565 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Rock B, Labib RS, Diaz LA. Monovalent Fab′ immunoglobulin fragments from endemic pemphigus foliaceus autoantibodies reproduce the human disease in neonatal Balb/c mice. J Clin Invest. (1990) 85:296–9. 10.1172/JCI114426 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.España A, Diaz LA, Mascaró JM, Giudice GJ, Fairley JA, Till GO, et al. Mechanisms of acantholysis in pemphigus foliaceus. Clin Immunol Immunopathol. (1997) 85:83–9. 10.1006/clin.1997.4407 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Xia P, Jordon RE, Geoghegan WD. Complement fixation by pemphigus Antibodt. Science. (1988) 82:1939–47. 10.1172/JCI113813 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hashimoto K, Shafran K, Webber P, Lazarus G, Singer K. Anti-cell surface pemphigus autoantibody stimulates plasminogen activator activity of human epidermal cells – a mechanism for the loss of epidermal cohesion and blister formation. J Exp Med. (1983) 157:259–72. 10.1084/jem.157.1.259 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ablin R. Levels of C'3 in the serum of patients with pemphigus. J Invest Dermatol. (1971) 56:450–3. 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12261375 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Franquini J, Adad S, Murta A, de Morais C, Teixeira Vde P, Júnior V. Tests of inflammatory activity in endemic pemphigus foliaceus. Rev Soc Bras. (1994) 27:25–9. 10.1590/S0037-86821994000100006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Messias-Reason I, Bosco DG, Nisihara RM, Jakobsen LH, Petzl-Erler ML, Jensenius JC. Circulating levels of mannan-binding lectin. (MBL) and MBL-associated serine protease 2 in endemic pemphigus foliaceus. Clin Exp Dermatol. (2008) 33:495–7. 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2008.02743.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kretzschmar GC, Oliveira LC, Nisihara RM, Velavan TP, Stinghen ST, Stahlke ERS, et al. Complement receptor 1 (CR1, CD35) association with susceptibility to leprosy. PLoS Neglected Trop Dis. (2018) 12:1–16. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006705 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Klickstein BYLB, Wong WW, Smith JA, Weis JH, Wilson JG, Fearon DT. HUMAN C3b/C4b RECEPTOR. (CR1) - demonstration of long homologous repeating domains that are composed of the short consensus repeats characteristic of C3/C4 binding proteins. J Exp. (1987) 165:1095–112. 10.1084/jem.165.4.1095 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wong WW, Cahill JM, Rosen MD, Kennedy CA, Bonaccio ET, Morris MJ, et al. Structure of the human CR1 gene. Molecular basis of the structural and quantitative polymorphisms and identification of a new CR1-like allele. J Exp Med. (1989) 169:847–63. 10.1084/jem.169.3.847 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Moulds JM, Zimmerman PA, Doumbo OK, Kassambara L, Sagara I, Diallo DA, et al. Molecular identification of Knops blood group polymorphisms found in long homologous region D of complement receptor 1. Blood. (2001) 97:2879–85. 10.1182/blood.V97.9.2879 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Khera R, Das N. Complement Receptor 1: disease associations and therapeutic implications. Mol Immunol. (2009) 46:761–72. 10.1016/j.molimm.2008.09.026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Danielsson C, Pascual M, French L, Steiger G, Schifferli JA. Soluble complement receptor type 1. (CD35) is released from leukocytes by surface cleavage. Eur J Immunol. (1994) 24:2725–31. 10.1002/eji.1830241123 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hamer I, Paccaud J, Belin D, Maeder C, Carpentier J. Soluble form of complement C3b/C4b receptor. (CR1) results from a proteolytic cleavage in the C-terminal region of CR1 transmembrane domain. Biochem J. (1998) 190:183–90. 10.1042/bj3290183 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Furtado PB, Huang CY, Ihyembe D, Hammond R, Marsh HC, Perkins SJ. The partly folded back solution structure arrangement of the 30 SCR domains in human complement receptor type 1. (CR1) permits access to its C3b and C4b ligands. J Mol Biol. (2008) 375:102–18. 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.09.085 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Liu D, Niu Z-X. The structure, genetic polymorphisms, expression and biological functions of complement receptor type 1. (CR1/CD35). Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. (2009) 31:524–35. 10.3109/08923970902845768 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Anna S, Heyman B. Specific IgM and regulation of antibody responses. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. (2017) 408:67–87. 10.1007/82_2017_24 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Török K, Dezso B, Bencsik A, Uzonyi B, Erdei A. Complement receptor type 1 (CR1/CD35) expressed on activated human CD4+ T cells contributes to generation of regulatory T cells. Immunol Lett. (2015) 164:117–24. 10.1016/j.imlet.2015.02.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Jozsi M, Prechl J, Bajtay Z, Erdei a. Complement receptor type 1 (CD35) mediates inhibitory signals in human B lymphocytes. J Immunol. (2002) 168:2782–8. 10.4049/jimmunol.168.6.2782 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bumiller-Bini V, Cipolla GA, Almeida RC De, Ludwig RJ, Beate A, Boldt W. Sparking fire under the skin? Answers from the association of complement genes with pemphigus foliaceus. Front Immunol. (2018) 9:1–9. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00695 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Probst CM, Bompeixe EP, Pereira NF. HLA polymorphism and evaluation of European, African, and Amerindian contribution to the white and mulatto populations from Paraná, Brazil. Hum Biol. (2000) 72:597–617. 10.1590/S0001-37652000000400010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Braun-Prado K, Vieira Mion AL, Farah Pereira N, Culpi L, Petzl-Erler ML. HLA class I polymorphism, as characterised by PCR-SSOP, in a Brazilian exogamic population. Tissue Antigens. (2000) 56:417–27. 10.1034/j.1399-0039.2000.560504.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Sambrook JR. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual Cold Spring, NY: CSHL Press; (2001). [Google Scholar]
- 41.Durbin RM, Abecasis GR, Altshuler DL, Bentley DR, Chakravarti A, Clark AG, et al. A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing. Nature. (2010) 467:1061–73. 10.1038/nature09534 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Gabriel S, Ziaugra L, Tabbaa D. SNP genotyping using the sequenom massARRAY iPLEX Platform. Curr Protocols Hum Genet. (2009) Chapter 2:Unit 2.12. 10.1002/0471142905.hg0212s60 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Oliveira LA, Marquart-filho A, Trevilato G, Timóteo RP, Mukai M, Roselino AMF, et al. Anti-desmoglein 1 and 3 autoantibody levels in endemic pemphigus foliaceus and pemphigus vulgaris from Brazil. Clin Lab. (2016) 62:1209–16. 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2015.150628 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and 2CT Method. Methods. (2001) 25:402–8. 10.1006/meth.2001.1262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Excoffier L, Lischer HE. Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol Ecol Resour. (2010) 10:564–7. 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02847.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MAR, Bender D, et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet. (2007) 81:559–75. 10.1086/519795 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Boldt ABW, Messias-Reason IJ, Meyer D, Schrago CG, Lang F, Lell B, et al. Phylogenetic nomenclature and evolution of mannose-binding lectin (MBL2) haplotypes. BMC Genet. (2010) 11:38. 10.1186/1471-2156-11-38 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Barrett JC, Fry B, Maller J, Daly MJ. Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics. (2005) 21:263–5. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth457 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Nebert DW. Proposal for an allele nomenclature system based on the evolutionary divergence of haplotypes. Hum Mutat. (2002) 20:463–72. 10.1002/humu.10143 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate : a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. JR Statist Soc. (1995) 57:289–300. 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Boyle AP, Hong EL, Hariharan M, Cheng Y, Schaub MA, Kasowski M, et al. Annotation of functional variation in personal genomes using RegulomeDB. Genome Res. (2012) 22:1790–1797. 10.1101/gr.137323.112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Ward LD, Kellis M. HaploReg: a resource for exploring chromatin states, conservation, and regulatory motif alterations within sets of genetically linked variants. Nucl Acids Res. (2012) 40:930–4. 10.1093/nar/gkr917 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Adzhubei IA, Schimidt S, Peshkin L, Ramensky VE, Gerasimova A, et al. A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat Methods. (2010) 7:248–9. 10.1038/nmeth0410-248 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Arnold M, Raffler J, Pfeufer A, Suhre K, Kastenmüller G. SNiPA: an interactive, genetic variant-centered annotation browser. Bioinformatics. (2015) 31:1334–6. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu779 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Arora V, Grover R, Kumar A, Anand D, Das N. Relationship of leukocyte CR1 transcript and protein with the pathophysiology and prognosis of systemic lupus erythematosus: a follow-up study. Lupus. (2011) 20:1010–8. 10.1177/0961203311400112 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Donius LR, Handy JM, Weis JJ, Weis JH. Optimal germinal center B cell activation and T-dependent antibody responses require the expression of the mouse complement receptor Cr1. J Immunol. (2013) 191:434–47. 10.4049/jimmunol.1203176 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Birmingham DJ, Irshaid F, Gavit KF, Nagaraja HN, Yu CY, Rovin BH, et al. A polymorphism in the type one complement receptor (CR1) involves an additional cysteine within the C3b/C4b binding domain that inhibits ligand binding. Mol Immunol. (2007) 44:3510–6. 10.1016/j.molimm.2007.03.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Duru KC, Noble JA, Guindo A, Yi L, Imumorin IG, Diallo DA, et al. Extensive genomic variability of Knops blood group polymorphisms is associated with sickle cell disease in Africa. Evol Bioinform. (2015) 11:25–34. 10.4137/EBO.S23132 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Yoon JH, Oh S, Shin S, Park JS, Roh EY, Song EY, et al. The polymorphism of Knops blood group system in Korean population and their relationship with HLA system. Hum Immunol. (2013) 74:196–8. 10.1016/j.humimm.2012.10.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Xiang L, Rundles JR, Hamilton DR, Wilson JG. Quantitative alleles of CR1: coding sequence analysis and comparison of haplotypes in two ethnic groups. J Immunol. (1999) 1:4939–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Luo J, Li S, Qin X, Song L, Peng Q, Chen S, et al. Meta-analysis of the association between CR1 polymorphisms and risk of late-onset Alzheimer's disease. Neurosci Lett. (2014) 578:165–70. 10.1016/j.neulet.2014.06.055 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Fontes AM, Kashima S, Bonfim-Silva R, Azevedo R, Abraham KJ, Roberto S, et al. Association between Knops blood group polymorphisms and susceptibility to malaria in an endemic area of the Brazilian Amazon. Genet Mol Biol. (2011) 34:539–45. 10.1590/S1415-47572011005000051 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Sweet RA, Seltman H, Emanuel JE, Lopez OL, Becker JT, Bis JC, et al. Effect of Alzheimer' s disease risk genes on trajectories of cognitive function in the cardiovascular health study. Am J Psychiatr. (2012) 169:954–62. 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.11121815 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Keenan BT, Shulman JM, Chibnik LB, Raj T, Tran D, Sabuncu MR, et al. A coding variant in CR1 interacts with APOE-ε4 to influence cognitive decline. Hum Mol Genet. (2012) 21:2377–88. 10.1093/hmg/dds054 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Arakelyan A, Zakharyan R, Khoyetsyan A, Poghosyan D, Aroutiounian R, Mrazek F, et al. Functional characterization of the complement receptor type 1 and its circulating ligands in patients with schizophrenia. BMC Clin Pathol. (2011) 11:1–7. 10.1186/1472-6890-11-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Kariuki SM, Rockett K, Clark TG, Reyburn H, Agbenyega T, Taylor TE, et al. The genetic risk of acute seizures in African children with falciparum malaria. Epilepsia. (2013) 54:990–1001. 10.1111/epi.12173 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Shen N, Chen B, Jiang Y, Feng R, Liao M, Zhang L, et al. An updated analysis with 85,939 samples confirms the association between CR1 rs6656401 polymorphism and Alzheimer's disease. Mol Neurobiol. (2014) 1–7. 10.1007/s12035-014-8761-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Daniels GL, Fletcher A, Garratty G, Henry S, Jørgensen J, Judd WJ, et al. Blood group terminology 2004 : from the International Society of Blood Transfusion committee on terminology for red cell surface antigens. Vox Sanguinis. (2004) 87:304–16. 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2004.00564.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Moulds JM, Thomas BJ, Doumbo O, Diallo DA, Lyke KE, Plowe CV, et al. Identification of the Kna / Knb polymorphism and a method for Knops genotyping. Transfusion. (2010) 44:164–9. 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2004.00615.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Veldhuisen B, Ligthart PC, Vidarsson G, Roels I, Folman CC, van der Schoot CE, et al. Molecular analysis of the York antigen of the Knops blood group system. Transfusion. (2011) 51:1389–96. 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02999.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Awandare GA, Spadafora C, Moch JK, Dutta S, Haynes JD, Stoute JA. Plasmodium falciparum field isolates use complement receptor 1 (CR1) as a receptor for invasion of erythrocytes. Mol Biochem Parasitol. (2011) 177:57–60. 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2011.01.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Schlesinger LS, Horwitz MA. Phagocytosis of leprosy bacilli is mediated by complement receptors CR1 and CR3 on human monocytes and complement component C3 in serum. J Clin Invest. (1990) 85:1304–14. 10.1172/JCI114568 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Bermudez LE, Young LS, Enkel H. Interaction of Mycobacterium avium complex with human macrophages : roles of membrane receptors and serum proteins. Infect Immun. (1991) 59:1697–702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Noumsi GT, Tounkara A, Diallo H, Billingsley K, Moulds JJ. Knops blood group polymorphism and susceptibility to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Transfusion. (2011) 51:2462–9. 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03161.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Rosenthal LA, Sutterwala FS, Kehrli ME, Mosser DM. Leishmania major - Human Macrophage Interactions: cooperation between Mac-1 (CD11b/CD18) and Complement Receptor Type 1 (CD35) in Promastigote Adhesion. Infect Immun. (1996) 64:2206–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Fernandez-Arias C, Lopez JP, Hernandez-Perez JN, Bautista-Ojeda MD, Branch O, Rodriguez A. Malaria inhibits surface expression of complement receptor-1 in monocyte/macrophages causing decreased immunecomplex internalization. J Immunol. (2014) 190:3363–72. 10.4049/jimmunol.1103812 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Teeranaipong P, Ohashi J, Patarapotikul J, Kimura R, Nuchnoi P, Hananantachai H, et al. A functional single-nucleotide polymorphism in the CR1 promoter region contributes to protection against cerebral malaria. J Infect Dis. (2008) 198:1880–91. 10.1086/593338 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Gomes JAS, Campi-Azevedo AC, Teixeira-Carvalho A, Silveira-Lemos D, Vitelli-Avelar D, Sathler-Avelar R, et al. Impaired phagocytic capacity driven by downregulation of major phagocytosis-related cell surface molecules elicits an overall modulatory cytokine profile in neutrophils and monocytes from the indeterminate clinical form of Chagas disease. Immunobiology. (2012) 217:1005–16. 10.1016/j.imbio.2012.01.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Bánki Z, Wilflingseder D, Ammann CG, Pruenster M, Müllauer B, Holländer K, et al. Factor I-mediated processing of complement fragments on HIV immune complexes targets HIV to CR2-expressing B cells and facilitates B cell-mediated transmission of opsonized HIV to T cells. J Immunol. (2006) 177:3469–76. 10.4049/jimmunol.177.5.3469 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Arora V, Verma J, Dutta R, Marwah V, Kumar A, Das N. Reduced complement receptor 1 (CR1, CD35) transcription in systemic lupus erythematosus. Mol Immunol. (2004) 41:449–56. 10.1016/j.molimm.2004.03.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Arora V, Matin A, Grover R, Kumar A, Chattopadhyay P, Das N. Modulation of CR1 transcript in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) by IFN- y and immune complex. Mol Immunol. (2007) 44:1722–8. 10.1016/j.molimm.2006.07.300 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Kavai M. Immune complex clearance by complement receptor type 1 in SLE. Autoimmun Rev. (2008) 8:160–4. 10.1016/j.autrev.2008.06.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Brouwers N, Van Cauwenberghe C, Engelborghs S, Lambert J-C, Bettens K, Le Bastard N, et al. Alzheimer risk associated with a copy number variation in the complement receptor 1 increasing C3b/C4b binding sites. Mol Psychiatr. (2012) 17:223–33. 10.1038/mp.2011.24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Hazrati L-N, Van Cauwenberghe C, Brooks PL, Brouwers N, Ghani M, Sato C, et al. Genetic association of CR1 with Alzheimer's disease: a tentative disease mechanism. Neurobiol Aging. (2012) 33:2949.e5–e12. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.07.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Mahmoudi R, Kisserli A, Novella J-L, Donvito B, Dramé M, Réveil B, et al. Alzheimer's disease is associated with low density of the long CR1 isoform. Neurobiol Aging. (2015) 36:1766.e5–12. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2015.01.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Mahmoudi R, Feldman S, Kisserli A, Tabary T, Bertholon L, Badr S, et al. Inherited and Acquired Decrease in Complement Receptor 1 (CR1) density on red blood cells associated with high levels of soluble CR1 in alzheimer's disease. Int J Mol Sci. (2018) 19:1–18. 10.3390/ijms19082175 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Rondelli T, Risitano AM, Latour RP De, Sica M, Peruzzi B, Barcellini W, et al. Polymorphism of the complement receptor 1 gene correlates with the hematologic response to eculizumab in patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria. Hematologica. (2014) 9:262–6. 10.3324/haematol.2013.090001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Deng Y, Li Z, Liu J, Wang Z, Cao Y, Mou Y, et al. Targeted resequencing reveals genetic risks in patients with sporadic idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Hum Mutat. (2018) 39:1238–45. 10.1002/humu.23566 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Gu H, Mickler EA, Cummings OW, Sandusky GE, Weber DJ, Gracon A, et al. Crosstalk between TGF-β1 and complement activation augments epithelial injury in pulmonary fibrosis. FASEB J. (2014) 28:4223–34. 10.1096/fj.13-247650 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Ma XY, Yu JT, Tan MS, Sun FR, Miao D, Tan L. Missense variants in CR1 are associated with increased risk of Alzheimer' disease in Han Chinese. Neurobiol Aging. (2014) 35:443:e17–21. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.08.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Jacquet M, Lacroix M, Ancelet S, Gout E, Gaboriaud C, Thielens NM, et al. Deciphering complement receptor type 1 interactions with recognition proteins of the lectin complement pathway. J Immunol. (2013) 190:3721–31. 10.4049/jimmunol.1202451 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Hess C, Sadallah S, Hefti A, Landmann R, Schifferli JA. Ectosomes Released by human neutrophils are specialized functional units. J Immunol. (1999) 163:4564–73. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Krych-goldberg M, Atkinson JP. Structure-function relationships of complement receptor type 1. Immunol Rev. (2001) 180:112–22. 10.1034/j.1600-065X.2001.1800110.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Goodfellow RM, Williams AS, Levin JL, Williams BD, Morgan BP. Local therapy with soluble complement receptor 1 (sCR1) suppresses inflammation in rat mono-articular arthritis. Clin Exp Immunol. (1997) 110:45–52. 10.1046/j.1365-2249.1997.5111408.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Dreja H, Annenkov A, Chernajovsky Y. Soluble complement receptor 1 (CD35) delivered by retrovirally infected syngeneic cells or by naked DNA injection prevents the progression of collagen-induced arthritis. Arthr Rheumat. (2000) 43:1698–709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Keshavjee S, Davis RD, Zamora MR, de Perrot M, Patterson GA. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of complement inhibition in ischemia-reperfusion injury after lung transplantation in human beings. J Thor Cardiovascul Surg. (2005) 129:423–8. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.06.048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this manuscript will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation, to any qualified researcher.