Abstract
Objective
This study aimed to determine the prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections and associated factors among school-age children in Sebeya primary school, northern Ethiopia, 2017.
Results
The prevalence of intestinal parasites in school-age children was (29.9%). A total of six parasites were detected in this study. E. histolytica/dispar 19.43% (82/422) and G. lamblia 8.29% (35/422) were the predominant ones. Unclean fingernail (AOR = 1.72), defecating in the open field (AOR = 2.82), and being barefooted (AOR = 1.72) were the determinant factors for intestinal parasitic infections. Frequently washing hands reduced the chance of infections by 68%. Furthermore, children in grade 1–4 and 5–6 had higher odds developing the infections than those in grade 7–8 (AOR = 8.21 and AOR = 2.50, respectively).
Keywords: Intestinal parasitic infections, Children, Prevalence, Polyparasitism, School
Introduction
Helminths and protozoa species, causing intestinal parasitic infections, are endemic worldwide. It is considered the pressing public health issues, predominantly in tropical and subtropical countries. About 3.5 billion individuals are impacted, of which and 450 million people suffering from the diseases [1]. In resource limited parts of the world, the problem of intestinal parasite diseases is deep [2]. The intestinal parasites are extremely common in crowded or unhealthy circumstances such as refuse heaps, gutters and wastewater units in and around people’s dwelling and living circumstances [3].
Children are disproportionately at risk for the infections, amongst others, owing to their increased nutritional requirements and less developed immune systems [4]. Intestinal parasite diseases linked with intestinal bleeding, nutrient malabsorption, nutrient deficiency, and cell and tissue destruction, anemia, intestinal obstruction, and mental and physical development retardation among children. Overall, these results in delayed growth, decreased mental development, school absenteeism, low academic achievement, prone to malnutrition and infection [5–7].
In Ethiopia, infections with intestinal parasites are toping the morbidity list in different health facilities. A. lumbricoides, T. trichiura, H. nana, histolytica/dispar, and S. mansoni are highly spread in the country [8–11]. There are, however, still several locations for which epidemiological data, including the research region, is not accessible. Poor environmental and personal hygiene, food contamination, unsafe drinking water, and improper management of urine and faeces led to the occurrence of the infection [12]. Poverty, analphabetism, bad sanitation, water inaccessibility, and warm and humid tropical climate have also been correlated with parasitic intestinal diseases in Ethiopia [10].
Determining the status of intestinal parasitic diseases and its correlates is crucial not only to formulate appropriate control strategies but also to envisage the risk to considered groups. Existing knowledge indicated the problem is differing from location to location based on the different variables enlisted in Ethiopia and there is scanty of information in the study area. This study, therefore, aimed to determine the prevalence and risk factors of intestinal parasites among schoolchildren in Northern Ethiopia.
Main text
Methods
Study setting and period
The study was conducted in Sebeya primary school from January to February 2017. It is located in Glomekeda district, northern Ethiopia, which 915 km far from Addis Ababa, the capital city of Ethiopia. The school is located in altitude of 2528 m above sea level and geographically it is located 14° 28′ 14.15′′ N latitude and 39° 29′ 40.5′′ E longitude.
Study design
Institution based cross-sectional study was employed.
Study population
School-age children from grade 1 to 8 who were available during the period of data collection, whose parents/guardians have given assent and who agreed to participate were included.
Sample size determination and sampling technique
The sample size was determined using a single population proportion formula, considering the proportion of intestinal parasitic infection 47.1% [13], a margin of error 5%, confidence interval of 95%, as assumptions. The final sample size was 422 including a 10% non-response rate students. Samples were selected by simple random sampling technique. Proportional allocation was made to select the study subjects from each grade level based on the number of students at each grade level.
Operational definitions
Intestinal parasitic infection (IPs): The participant was recorded positive for IPs if the stool sample examined by microscopy becomes positive to cyst or trophozoite of any parasite.
Washing hands at critical times: Washing hands after visiting the toilet, before a meal, after touching the bottom of the child, after touching animal pets, before food preparation.
Knowledge: Participants were asked to answer 10 knowledge questions about transmission and prevention methods of intestinal parasitic infection. Graded as having “Good knowledge” if they had answered correctly (≥ 80%) 8–10 questions, medium if they had answered (50–70%) 5–7 questions, and < 5 questions as “Poor knowledge”.
Data collection tools and procedure
To collect appropriate data from each student, a structured questionnaire was prepared. Parents and guardians of the chosen learners were traced and interviewed for socio-demographic variables, environmental factors, and hygienic behavior. Meanwhile, data collectors verified the accessibility of the bathroom and the fingernail cleanliness of each student.
Stool sample collection and processing
Two gram of new fecal samples were gathered from children and put in separately labeled containers of smooth plastic stools. The nature of the stool sample was observed and the date of sampling was also noted. The specimens were preserved with 10% formalin and transported to the Mekelle University Medical Parasitology Laboratory. To identify parasitic organisms, a method of formol-ether concentration was employed as described by the standard method [14].
Quality control
Data collectors and supervisors have been trained on the methods of data collection. On the spot checking of the completeness of the data was done. The stool specimen examination was done following standard laboratory procedures and few randomly selected samples were re-checked for verification.
Data processing and analysis
Data were entered into EPI Info 7 and exported to SPSS 20 for analysis. Mean, frequency and percentage were used for description. A binary logistic regression model was used to identify significantly associated variables at a p value < 0.05. During bivariate analysis, variables with a p-value < 0.2 were candidates for multivariable logistic regression for the final model. Hosmer and Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test were performed.
Results
Socio-demographic characteristics
This research involved a total of 422 school children, which yields 100% response rate. About 227 (53.79%) were females. The mean (± SD) age of study participants was 11.5 (± 2.31) years. Half of the parents (50.24%) receive less than 500 ETB of monthly income (Additional file 1: Table S1).
Environmental and behavioral characteristics
Two-thirds of children’s parents (63.6%) collected water from well water and 258 (61.1%) washing their hands at critical moments. Two hundred and forty-three (57.6%) of children frequently brushed their teeth and 183 (43.8%) clean their fingernail. More than two-thirds of children (65.4%) always had to wear shoes. Two hundred and thirty-nine (56.6%) children had little knowledge on prevention and control of intestinal parasite infection (Table 1).
Table 1.
Variables | Frequency (n) | Percent (%) |
---|---|---|
Type of water source | ||
Pipe | 58 | 13.7 |
Spring | 96 | 22.7 |
Hand dug well | 268 | 63.6 |
Open field defecation | ||
Yes | 35 | 8.3 |
No | 387 | 91.7 |
Washing hands at critical times | ||
Yes | 258 | 61.1 |
No | 164 | 38.9 |
Frequency of taking bath | ||
Once a week | 84 | 19.9 |
Once in a month | 61 | 14.5 |
Twice a month | 277 | 65.6 |
Brushing teeth regularly | ||
Yes | 243 | 57.6 |
No | 179 | 42.4 |
Frequency of washing cloth | ||
Once a week | 42 | 10.0 |
Twice a month | 134 | 31.8 |
Once a month | 246 | 58.2 |
Clean finger nail | ||
Yes | 185 | 43.8 |
No | 237 | 56.2 |
Shoe wearing habit | ||
Regular | 276 | 65.4 |
Irregular | 146 | 34.6 |
Knowledge | ||
Knowledgeable | 103 | 24.4 |
Not knowledgeable | 319 | 75.6 |
Prevalence of the intestinal parasite infection
The prevalence of intestinal parasite infection was 29.9% (95% CI 27.7–32.1%). About 31.3% (61/195) of males were infected with at least one parasite and 28.6% (65/227) of females had the infection. The rate of single, double, and triple parasite infections was 73.02% (92/126), 20.63% (26/126), and 6.35% (8/126), respectively. A total of six parasites were detected and E. histolytica/dispar 19.43% (82/422) and G. lamblia 8.29% (35/422) were the predominant ones (Table 2).
Table 2.
Type of intestinal parasite | Number of male +ve (%) | Number of female +ve (%) | Total number of +ve (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Single infection (n = 92) | |||
E. histolytica/dispar | 26 (6.2) | 24 (5.7) | 50 (11.8) |
G. lamblia | 8 (1.9) | 12 (2.8) | 20 (4.7) |
A. lumbricoides | 8 (1.9) | 6 (1.4) | 14 (3.3) |
H. nana | 2 (0.5) | 1 (0.2) | 3 (0.7) |
Hookworm | 1 (0.2) | 2 (0.5) | 3 (0.7) |
T. trichiura | 1 (0.2) | 1 (0.2) | 2 (0.5) |
Double infection (n = 26) | |||
E. histolytica/dispar and G.lamblia | 6 (1.4) | 4 (0.9) | 10 (2.4) |
E. histolytica/dispar and A. lumbricoides | 4 (0.9) | 3 (0.7) | 7 (1.7) |
E. histolytica/dispar and H. nana | 2 (0.5) | 5 (1.2) | 7 (1.7) |
G. lamblia and A. lumbricoides | 0 (0.0) | 2 (0.5) | 2 (0.5) |
Triple infection (n = 8) | |||
E. histolytica/dispar, G. lamblia and H. nana | 2 (0.5) | 1 (0.2) | 3 (0.7) |
E. histolytica/dispar, H. nana and Hookworm | 0 (0.0) | 3 (0.7) | 3 (0.7) |
E. histolytica/dispar, Hookworm and T. trichiura | 1 (0.2) | 1 (0.2) | 2 (0.5) |
Total | 61 (14.5) | 65 (15.4) | 126 (29.9) |
Factors associated with intestinal parasitic infection
In multivariable analysis; grade level, father occupation, clean fingernail, open field defecation, hand washing at critical times, and shoe wearing habit were discovered to be statistically associated with parasitic intestinal diseases (p-value < 0.05) (Table 3).
Table 3.
Risk factor | Status of intestinal parasitic infections | COR (95% CI) | AOR (95% CI) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Positive, n (%) | Negative, n (%) | |||
Grade level | ||||
1–4 | 90 (50.6) | 88 (49.4) | 9.29 (4.78, 18.06)** | 8.21 (3.88, 17.48)** |
5–6 | 24 (19.5) | 99 (80.5) | 2.20 (1.05, 4.64)** | 2.51 (1.14, 5.540)* |
7–8 | 12 (9.9) | 109 (90.1) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Father occupation | ||||
Farmer | 88 (28.5) | 221 (71.5) | 1.25 (0.66, 2.35) | 1.26 (0.62, 2.53) |
Daily labourer | 16 (51.6) | 15 (48.4) | 3.34 (1.34, 8.33)** | 2.96 (1.07, 8.18)* |
Trader | 7 (35.0) | 13 (65.0) | 1.69 (0.57, 5.00) | 1.28 (0.38, 4.22) |
Civil servant | 15 (24.2) | 47 (75.8) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Clean finger nail | ||||
Yes | 43 (23.2) | 142 (76.8) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
No | 83 (35.0) | 154 (65.0) | 1.78 (1.15, 2.74)** | 1.72 (1.04, 2.85)** |
Open field defecation | ||||
Yes | 21 (60.0) | 14 (40.0) | 4.03 (1.98, 8.21)** | 2.82 (1.21, 7.45)** |
No | 105 (27.1) | 282 (72.9) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Washing hands at critical times | ||||
Yes | 71 (27.5) | 187 (72.5) | 0.45 (0.29, 0.69)** | 0.32 (0.16, 0.65)* |
No | 55 (33.5) | 109 (66.5) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Shoe wearing habit | ||||
Regular | 57 (31.5) | 124 (68.5) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Irregular | 82 (32.3) | 172 (67.7) | 3.44 (2.22, 5.33)** | 1.72 (1.02, 2.91)** |
1.00 = Reference, *significant at p value < 0.05, **significant at p value < 0.001
According to this study, children in grade 1–4 and 5–6 were 8.21 and 2.5 times more likely than their counterparts to have intestinal parasitic diseases [AOR = 8.21, 95% CI 3.88, 17.47, and AOR = 2.50, 95% CI 1.14, 5.54]. Children whose father’s work was a daily worker were 2.96 times more likely than children whose father’s job was a civil servant to develop intestinal parasitic diseases [AOR = 2.96, 95% CI 1.07, 8.18].
Children with unclean fingernails were 1.72 times more probable than children with clean fingernails to develop parasitic intestinal infections [AOR = 1.72, 95% CI 1.04, 2.85]. On the other side, children who were washing hands at critical moments were 68% less probable than their counterparts to develop intestinal parasite infection [AOR = 0.32, 95% CI 0.16, 0.65]. Children who defecate in the open field were 2.82 times higher odds of developing intestinal parasite infections compared to children who did not practice open field defecation [AOR = 2.82, 95% CI 1.21, 7.45]. Besides, the prevalence of intestinal parasite diseases was 72% greater in children with uneven shoe habit [AOR = 1.72, 95% CI 1.02, 2.91].
Discussion
The purpose of this research was to evaluate the prevalence of parasitic intestinal diseases among school-age children. In the current research, the prevalence of intestinal parasite diseases was discovered to be 29.9%. This finding is comparable with other studies that reported 27.2% in Babile [9], and 29.3% in Mekelle [15]. On the other hand, the prevalence was greater than the study conducted in Tilili, Ethiopia, which was reported to be 26.2% [11], and in Butajira, Ethiopia, which was 23.3% [16]. To the contrary, higher prevalence of intestinal parasites disease was found from 58 to 83.8% in different towns of Ethiopia [17–20]. Similarly, a higher prevalence of the disease compared to the current finding was reported in sub-Saharan Africa; e.g. 48.7% in Tanzania [23], and 90.4% in Central Sudan [24]. The distinction in parasitological diagnostic techniques used, level of environmental sanitation, source of drinking water, family education and personal hygiene may be correlated with the discrepancy [21].
Grade level of school children was found to be a significant predictor of intestinal parasitic infections; lower-grade school children had higher probability of developing the infections when compared to their counterparts. Children of lesser grade tend to play in the open field and generally touch their mouth with their dirty fingers may explain the result. Their understanding of disease prevention and control mechanisms could be small, further predisposing to diseases with parasites. The finding is consistent with comparable research in Ethiopia showing that children in lower grade had a greater prevalence of intestinal parasite diseases [22, 23].
Interventions in public health including access to safely managed drinking water, community health education, food hygiene, functional sanitation systems are key for long-term intestinal parasite control [21, 24–26]. In this research, the main modifiable predictors’ hygiene behavior such as the cleanliness of fingernail and not handwashing, and open defecation. Chances of infection with intestinal parasites have risen by 72% among children with unclean fingernails compared to children with smooth fingernails, which is consistent with other research [21, 23, 27, 28]. Because the fecal–oral path is the primary pathway for the spread of parasite diseases, unclean fingernails can increase the incidence and intensity of intestinal parasite diseases [27]. Because their habitat is unclean fingers, the life-cycle of soil-borne intestinal parasites can cause direct feco-oral transmission of intestinal parasites.
This research showed that the risk of intestinal parasite infection among children who commonly washed their hands at critical moments was lowered by 68% compared to children who did not wash. This finding is comparable with the study conducted in different parts of Ethiopian [21, 23, 27]. This can be because children get germs when they touch infected items, which increases the probability of disease. Hand washing is, therefore, the most efficient way to prevent infection from spreading [27, 29, 30]. Similarly, among children who used protective shoes irregularly compared to their counterparts, the chance of affected by intestinal parasite infections increased by 72%. The finding is in agreement with comparable research in developing nations [17, 21, 28]. Possible explanations of shoe-wearing habit link and enhanced infection with parasites may be due to enhanced potential for infection with hookworm. Lack of protective shoes is known to boost the likelihood of infection with hookworms [21].
This study revealed that there was a higher probability of parasite illnesses among children defecating in the open field. This was in agreement with other studies [31, 32]. The possible explanation might be improper management of human feaces led to disease-causing pathogens, particularly infectious eggs and helminth larvae would litter the atmosphere. As these illnesses are transferred through the fecal–oral route or direct skin penetration, the risk of infection with such environmental contamination will increase [25, 26].
Conclusion
In the studied area, the prevalence of intestinal parasite diseases among school-age children was high. Infection with polyparasitism was also a concern. Improving socioeconomic status, enhancing sanitation services, instilling health education and encouraging methods to maintain personal hygiene, constantly developing shoe habit can be excellent strategies for controlling these infections in the region. It is suggested to create a school-based understanding of how intestinal parasites are transmitted.
Limitations
The study’s main limitation was that we did not measure the intensity of the parasite infection, which might better illustrate the degree of infection in the study area. Due to the lack of laboratory equipment, opportunistic infections were not evaluated.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
The authors are pleased to acknowledge the data collectors, field supervisors, study participants, laboratory technologists, Glomekeda District Health Office, Sebeya Primary School principal, Tigray Regional Health Bureau for their unreserved contributions to the success of this study. The authors would also like to extend their gratitude to the Glomekeda District administrators for their facilitation.
Abbreviations
- AOR
adjusted odds ratio
- CI
confidence interval
- COR
crude odds ratio
- SD
standard deviation
- SPSS
statistical package for social sciences
Authors’ contributions
All the authors actively participated during the conception of the research issue, development of a research proposal, data collection, analysis and interpretation, and writing various parts of the research report. AD, TGG and BK had designed the study protocol and had supervised the quality of data, analyzed the data and had written the manuscript. SDW and DHC had analyzed the data and had written the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
Not applicable.
Availability of data and materials
Data will be made available upon request the primary author.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study was conducted after approval of the project by an ethical review committee of college of health science, Mekelle University. Students were involved in the study after receiving written informed consent from their family/guardians and school principal. Children positive for intestinal parasitic infection were treated free of charge and brief health education is given.
Consent for publication
This manuscript does not contain any person’s data.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Awrajaw Dessie, Email: awrajawdss@gmail.com.
Tesfay Gebregzabher Gebrehiwot, Email: tesfig@yahoo.com.
Berihu Kiros, Email: berihukiros@gmail.com.
Sintayehu Daba Wami, Email: sintayehudaba2004@gmail.com.
Daniel Haile Chercos, Email: daniel.haile7@gmail.com.
Supplementary information
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1186/s13104-019-4759-1.
References
- 1.Okyay P, Ertug S, Gultekin B, Onen O, Beser E. Intestinal parasites prevalence and related factors in school children, a western city sample-Turkey. BMC Public Health. 2004;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-4-64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mahfouz AA, El-Morshedy H, Farghaly A, Khalil A. Ecological determinants of intestinal parasitic infections among pre-school children in an urban squatter settlement of Egypt. J Trop Pediatr. 1997;43(6):341–344. doi: 10.1093/tropej/43.6.341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Korkes F, Kumagai FU, Belfort RN, Szejnfeld D, Abud TG, Kleinman A, et al. Relationship between intestinal parasitic infection in children and soil contamination in an urban slum. J Trop Pediatr. 2008;55(1):42–45. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmn038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Awasthi S, Bundy DA, Savioli L. Helminthic infections. BMJ. 2003;327(7412):431–433. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7412.431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dickson R, Awasthi S, Williamson P, Demellweek C, Garner P. Effects of treatment for intestinal helminth infection on growth and cognitive performance in children: systematic review of randomised trials. BMJ. 2000;320(7251):1697–1701. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7251.1697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Taylor-Robinson DC, Maayan N, Soares-Weiser K, Donegan S, Garner P. Deworming drugs for soil-transmitted intestinal worms in children: effects on nutritional indicators, haemoglobin, and school performance. The Cochrane Library. 2015 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000371.pub6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Haque R. Human intestinal parasites. J Health Popul Nutr. 2007;25:387–391. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gelaw A, Anagaw B, Nigussie B, Silesh B, Yirga A, Alem M, et al. Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections and risk factors among schoolchildren at the University of Gondar Community School, Northwest Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):304. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tadesse G. The prevalence of intestinal helminthic infections and associated risk factors among school children in Babile town, eastern Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Dev. 2005;19(2):140–147. doi: 10.4314/ejhd.v19i2.9983. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Legesse M, Erko B. Prevalence of intestinal parasites among schoolchildren in a rural area close to the southeast of Lake Langano, Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Dev. 2004;18(2):116–120. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Abera A, Nibret E. Prevalence of gastrointestinal helminthic infections and associated risk factors among schoolchildren in Tilili town, northwest Ethiopia. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2014;7(7):525–530. doi: 10.1016/S1995-7645(14)60088-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Organization WH. Prevention and control of intestinal parasitic infections: report of a WHO Expert Committee [meeting held in Geneva from 3 to 7 March 1986]; 1987. [PubMed]
- 13.Yami A, Mamo Y, Kebede S. Prevalence and predictors of intestinal helminthiasis among school children in Jimma zone; a cross-sectional study. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2011;21(3):167–174. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yimer M, Hailu T, Mulu W, Abera B. Evaluation performance of diagnostic methods of intestinal parasitosis in school age children in Ethiopia. BMC Res Notes. 2015;8(1):820. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1822-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Alemu M, Bedemo H, Bugssa G, Bayissa S, Tedla K. Epidemiology of intestinal parasite infections among kindergarten children in Mekelle Town, Northern Ethiopia. Int J Pharma Sci Res. 2015;6(11):1392–1396. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Shumbej T, Belay T, Mekonnen Z, Tefera T, Zemene E. Soil-transmitted helminths and associated factors among pre-school children in Butajira Town, South-Central Ethiopia: a community-based cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(8):e0136342. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sitotaw B, Mekuriaw H, Damtie D. Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections and associated risk factors among Jawi primary school children, Jawi town, north-west Ethiopia. BMC Infect Dis. 2019;19(1):341. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-3971-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Legesse M, Erko B. Prevalence of intestinal parasites among schoolchildren in a rural area close to the southeast of Lake Langano, Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Dev. 2004;18(116):120. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mengistu A, Gebre-Selassie S, Kassa T. Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections among urban dwellers in southwest Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Dev. 2007;21(1):12–17. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Workneh T, Esmae A, Ayichiluhm M. Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections and associated factors among Debre Elias primary schools children, East Gojjam Zone, Amhara Region, North West Ethiopia. J Bacteriol Parasitol. 2014;15:1–5. doi: 10.4172/2155-9597.1000181. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hailegebriel T. Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections and associated risk factors among students at Dona Berber primary school, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia. BMC Infect Dis. 2017;17(1):362. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2466-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Tefera E, Mohammed J, Mitiku H. Intestinal helminthic infections among elementary students of Babile town, eastern Ethiopia. Pan African Med J. 2015;20(1):50. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2015.20.50.5251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Fentahun AA, Asrat A, Bitew A, Mulat S. Intestinal parasitic infections and associated factors among mentally disabled and non-disabled primary school students, Bahir Dar, Amhara regional state, Ethiopia, 2018: a comparative cross-sectional study. BMC Infect Dis. 2019;19(1):549. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4165-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Anuar TS, Al-Mekhlafi HM, Ghani MKA, Osman E, Yasin AM, Nordin A, et al. Prevalence and risk factors associated with Entamoeba histolytica/dispar/moshkovskii infection among three Orang Asli ethnic groups in Malaysia. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(10):e48165. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Mara D, Lane J, Scott B, Trouba D. Sanitation and health. PLoS Med. 2010;7(11):e1000363. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lewin S, Norman R, Nannan N, Thomas E, Bradshaw D, Collaboration SACRA Estimating the burden of disease attributable to unsafe water and lack of sanitation and hygiene in South Africa in 2000. South Afr Med J. 2007;97(8):755–762. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Mahmud MA, Spigt M, Bezabih AM, Pavon IL, Dinant G-J, Velasco RB. Efficacy of handwashing with soap and nail clipping on intestinal parasitic infections in school-aged children: a factorial cluster randomized controlled trial. PLoS Med. 2015;12(6):e1001837. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Alamir M, Awoke W, Feleke A. Intestinal parasites infection and associated factors among school children in Dagi primary school, Amhara National Regional State, Ethiopia. Health. 2013;5(10):1697. doi: 10.4236/health.2013.510228. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bloomfield SF, Aiello AE, Cookson B, O’boyle C, Larson EL. The effectiveness of hand hygiene procedures in reducing the risks of infections in home and community settings including handwashing and alcohol-based hand sanitizers. Am J Infect Control. 2007;35(10):S27–S64. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2007.07.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Haas JP. Handwashing and nail clipping reduce risk of intestinal parasite infection in school-age children. Evid Based Nurs. 2016;19(2):49. doi: 10.1136/eb-2015-102202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ayalew A, Debebe T, Worku A. Prevalence and risk factors of intestinal parasites among Delgi school children, North Gondar, Ethiopia. J Parasitol Vector Biol. 2011;3(5):75–81. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Asemahagn MA. Parasitic infection and associated factors among the primary school children in Motta town, western Amhara, Ethiopia. Am J Pub Health. 2014;2:248–254. doi: 10.12691/ajphr-2-6-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Data will be made available upon request the primary author.