Skip to main content
Frontiers in Immunology logoLink to Frontiers in Immunology
. 2019 Nov 22;10:2697. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02697

Cathelicidin Contributes to the Restriction of Leishmania in Human Host Macrophages

Peter Crauwels 1,2,3, Elena Bank 1,3, Bianca Walber 1, Ulf Alexander Wenzel 3,4, Birgitta Agerberth 5, Menberework Chanyalew 6, Markos Abebe 6, Renate König 7, Uwe Ritter 8, Norbert Reiling 9, Ger van Zandbergen 1,3,10,11,*
PMCID: PMC6883804  PMID: 31824492

Abstract

In cutaneous Leishmaniasis the parasitic control in human host macrophages is still poorly understood. We found an increased expression of the human cathelicidin CAMP in skin lesions of Ethiopian patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis. Vitamin D driven, Cathelicidin-type antimicrobial peptides (CAMP) play an important role in the elimination of invading microorganisms. Recombinant cathelicidin was able to induce cell-death characteristics in Leishmania in a dose dependent manner. Using human primary macrophages, we demonstrated pro-inflammatory macrophages (hMDM1) to express a higher level of human cathelicidin, both on gene and protein level, compared to anti-inflammatory macrophages (hMDM2). Activating the CAMP pathway using Vitamin D in hMDM1 resulted in a cathelicidin-mediated-Leishmania restriction. Finally, a reduction of cathelicidin in hMDM1, using a RNA interference (RNAi) approach, increased Leishmania parasite survival. In all, these data show the human cathelicidin to contribute to the innate immune response against Leishmaniasis in a human primary cell model.

Keywords: Leishmania, human macrophages, vitamin D, cathelicidin (LL-37), human primary immune cells, antimicrobial activity

Introduction

The disease Leishmaniasis is still affecting 12 million people worldwide, of which up to 30,000 cases die yearly (1, 2). Up to date, no vaccine is available and treatment is not always evident due to the socioeconomic conditions in the affected countries (3, 4). Our knowledge regarding the interaction of Leishmania with its human host cell, the macrophage, is still fragmentary, as little is known with respect to antimicrobial mechanisms restricting Leishmania growth in human primary macrophages. Moreover, few data is available demonstrating which macrophage phenotype is the most superior for Leishmania survival or killing. The human body comprises a broad spectrum of different macrophage phenotypes, related to distinct functional properties (5). Herein, the M1/M2 polarization has been the main framework for years in the field of immunology. In the murine system, “alternatively activated” type 2 macrophages are shown to support Leishmania parasite replication and persistence via an increased arginase I activity, which negatively correlates to the expression of nitric oxide synthase II (610). In contrast, “classically activated” M1 inflammatory macrophages enhance the production of free nitric oxide (NO) radicals, hereby eliminating intracellular parasites (11, 12). In human macrophages however, NO-mediated killing of Leishmania is still under debate, underlying the controversy of extrapolating immunological aspects from mouse to man (1316). Nevertheless, antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), comprising defensins and cathelicidins, are key players in the human host's immune defense. In humans, only the cathelicidin antimicrobial protein hCAP18, encoded by the gene CAMP, has been identified. The CAMP gene product is cleaved to form the amphipathic, active LL37 peptide. LL37 can be found in various cell types, body fluids and tissues, such as the skin, where an increased production has been described to correlate with disease pathologies (17, 18). As a key molecule in host defense, LL37 exerts antimicrobial properties toward bacteria (Staphylococcus spp., Pseudomonas spp., Mycobacteria spp.), viruses, fungi, as well as parasites (1926). Dos Santos et al. could demonstrate cathelicidin to exert anti-leishmanial activity in L. donovani infected macrophages, in line with data of Dos Santos et al. showing an IL-32/cathelicidin-mediated control of L. braziliensis in THP-1 cells (27). This AMP, LL37, able to create pores, hereby disrupting membranes. Although the exact mode of action is unknown, two models have been widely accepted being the “carpet” and “toroidal” model (17, 28). The toroidal model defines a pore architecture, formed by peptide channels, whereas the carpet model describes a more severe membrane perturbation, as seen for detergent-induced membrane destruction (29). In this study, we aimed to identify a role for the human cathelicidin during Leishmania infection. We could demonstrate CAMP to be upregulated in lesion material from Ethiopian individuals suffering from cutaneous Leishmaniasis. Using a human primary macrophage in vitro model, we identified CAMP to be upregulated specifically in pro-inflammatory macrophages and rLL37 was demonstrated to kill Leishmania in a dose dependent manner. By modulating the vitamin D pathway, we demonstrated CAMP expression to be upregulated, enhancing the macrophage's parasite killing capacity. In contrast, using a RNA interference (RNAi) approach in human primary macrophages targeting CAMP mRNA, the expression of hCAP18 was strongly reduced, enabling Leishmania parasites to survive better. In all, these data suggest an anti-parasitic activity of cathelicidin in a human primary in vitro cell model for cutaneous leishmaniasis and patient skin lesions.

Results

An Increased Expression of Cathelicidin in Skin Biopsies of African Patients With Cutaneous Leishmaniasis

In search for antimicrobial mechanisms in self-healing cutaneous Leishmaniasis (CL), we investigated the expression of human cathelicidin hCAP18. In Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, clinical samples from patients with CL and controls were collected and tested using RT-PCR. Patients varied in age, ethnicity, disease duration, and wound location, as depicted (Figures 1A,B). All patients were tested positive for the presence of Leishmania aethiopica by PCR. Interestingly, a significantly higher transcript abundance of the human cathelicidin hCAP18 was detected in skin biopsies of patients with CL, compared to control samples (Figure 1C).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Increased expression of cathelicidin in skin biopsy of patients with cutaneous Leishmaniasis (CL). (A,B) Samples were collected from CL patients, with cutaneous lesions (B), derived from people with a different ethnicity (A). (C) Skin biopsies, from healthy (n = 10) or CL patients (n = 10), were collected from which CAMP gene expression was assessed by qRT-PCR. Relative gene expression was normalized against GAPDH and presented as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis (Mann–Whitney test) was used to compare groups using GraphPad statistical software (*p < 0.05).

Dose Dependent Killing of Leishmania Parasites by Recombinant LL37

LL-37 and its precursor, hCAP18, are found in different tissue and cell types, playing an important role in innate immunity against diverse pathogens, e.g., S. aureus, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, L. monocytogenes (17). To define whether the hCAP18-derived peptide, LL37, is contributing to clearance of Leishmania parasites, we treated the promastigote and amastigote life stage of both Leishmania major (Lm) and L. aethiopica (Lae) with human recombinant LL37 (hrLL37). After treatment with hrLL37, DNA fragmentation and phosphatidylserine (PS) exposure, two hallmarks of apoptosis, were assessed. Treatment with increasing concentrations of hrLL37 resulted in a dose-dependent increase in TUNEL positivity for both Lae (15.5 ± 8.3%; 21.1 ± 2.3%) and Lm (20.2 ± 0.7%; 22.9 ± 3.1%), compared to untreated Lae (13.3 ± 1.2%) and Lm (6.24 ± 1.9%) promastigotes (Figures 2A,B). In addition, hrLL37 treatment induced a round-shaped morphology, as was described for apoptotic parasites (Figure 2C) (30). In line, hrLL37 treatment of promastigotes resulted in significant increase in AnnexinA5-binding parasites, in a dose-dependent manner, for Lae (27.1 ± 14.3%; 31.3 ± 26%) and Lm (51.5 ± 20.5%; 74.8 ± 23.2%), compared to untreated Lae (8.0 ± 4.5%) and Lm (14.7 ± 11.1%) (Figures 2D,E).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Dose dependent killing of Leishmania by human recombinant LL-37. Both logarithmic phase Lm and Lae promastigotes and axenic amastigotes were treated with different concentrations of rLL-37 or 25 μM staurosporine (+). After 24–72 h, DNA fragmentation was assessed by flow cytometry (A,B) for Lae and Lm promastigotes, respectively, and microscopy (C) and for Lae and Lm amastigotes (H,I). Using flow cytometry Annexin binding was assessed by promastigotes (D,E) and axenic amastigotes (F,G) from Lae and Lm, respectively. Data are presented as mean ± SD of at least 3 independent experiments (paired t-test; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ns, not significant; pro, promastigotes; ama, amastigotes).

Treatment of Lae amastigotes also resulted in a significant increase in AnnexinA5 binding (71.3 ± 12.6%) and TUNEL positivity (87.0 ± 6.1%) compared to the untreated controls (18.7 ± 6.1%; 32.3 ± 13.3%) (Figures 2F–H). Interestingly, treatment of Lm amastigotes with rhLL37, resulted in only a minor but significant increase of AnnexinA5 binding (8.3 ± 3.0%), however TUNEL positivity (12.1 ± 2.1%) did not significantly increase, compared to the respective controls (3.3 ± 2.3%; 12.0 ± 6.6%) (Figures 2G–I). In all, we demonstrated hrLL37 to induce cell death characteristics, restricting parasites viability in a dose-dependent manner.

Expression of Cathelicidin Is More Prominent in Pro-inflammatory Than in Anti-inflammatory Human Macrophages

Human macrophages are key players during Leishmania infection. In a next step, the suitability of both human primary monocyte derived macrophages type 1 (hMDM1) and type 2 (hMDM2) as host for Leishmania parasites was assessed. From human blood, monocytes were isolated and differentiated using rhGM-CSF (10 ng/ml) or rhM-CSF (30 ng/ml), to generate hMDM1 or hMDM2, respectively. The hMDM1 were characterized by their fried-egg shaped morphology and CD14+MHCII+CD163 phenotype (Figure 3A, upper lane). In contrast, anti-inflammatory hMDM2 have more elongated cell bodies and were phenotyped as CD14+MHCII+CD163+ (Figure 3A, lower lane). Interestingly, gene expression analysis demonstrated the gene CAMP, which encodes cathelicidin, to be significantly higher expressed in hMDM1, compared to hMDM2 (Figure 3B). Also a significant elevated cathelicidin protein amount was present in hMDM1 (0.25 ± 0.85) compared to hMDM2 (0.01 ± 0.04) (Figure 3C). In a next step, both hMDM phenotypes were infected with transgenic Lm promastigotes or axenic amastigotes, after which parasite infection rate (LmdsRed+ hMDM) was assessed. Of note, the dsRed protein is constitutively expressed, in viable Leishmania parasites, as described previously (31). At early (24–48 hpi) and late time points (6–7 dpi) after promastigote infection, a significantly higher infection rate was observed in hMDM2 (52.7 ± 15.6%; 57.4 ± 16.4%), compared to hMDM1 (40.8 ± 11.5%; 50.4 ± 13.4%) (Figures 3D,E). Infection with amastigotes resulted in a high infection rate, which however did not differ significantly between early and late time points in hMDM1 (83.2 ± 19.5%; 75.0 ± 22.4%) and hMDM2 (82.9 ± 10.8%; 74.2 ± 16.6%), respectively (Figure 3F). Of note, the transgenic Lm promastigotes transformed into amastigotes in vitro, as the expression of dsRed increased (increase in mean fluorescent intensity, MFI) (Figure 3G). Altogether, pro-inflammatory human macrophages were demonstrated to express cathelicidin to a higher extent, which may contribute to an impaired parasite survival.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Expression of cathelicidin is more prominent in pro-inflammatory hMDM1 then in anti-inflammatory hMDM2. (A) Live cell imaging DIC micrographs of inflammatory hMDM1 and anti-inflammatory hMDM2, characterized by flow cytometry for CD14, CD163, and MHC-II surface expression (black line) in line with the isotype controls (gray). (B,C) CAMP gene expression (n = 17) (B) and cathelicidin protein expression (n = 21) (C) were assessed in hMDM1 and hMDM2 by qRT-PCR and western blot. CAMP expression was normalized against the house keeping gene GAPHD. Western blots were analyzed by densitometry (ImageJ analysis), normalizing cathelicidin against ß-actin protein expression. (D–F) Both hMDM1 and hMDM2 were infected with either transgenic Lm pro (n = 22–24) (D,E) or ama (n = 3–4) (F) (MOI of 10). After 3 h, extracellular parasites were removed by washing following incubation at 37°C, 5% CO2. After 24–48 hpi (early infection) or 6–7 dpi (late infection) infection rate was assessed by flow cytometry. (G) Lm dsRed pro transform into ama over time, indicated by an increased fluorescent intensity. Micrographs, histograms and data, presented as mean ± SD, are representative for at least 3 independent experiments (Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ns, not significant; pro, promastigotes; ama, amastigotes).

Vitamin-D Derivatives Induce Cathelicidin-Mediated-Leishmania Restriction in Human Primary Macrophages

To investigate the role of cathelicidin in Leishmania restriction further, we increased expression of cathelicidin using Vitamin D derivatives. Upon activating the Vitamin-D pathway in hMDM1, using 1α, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (calcitriol, CCT, 100 nM) and calcipotriol (CPT, 100 nM), a synthetic VitD3 analog, we assessed Leishmania parasite survival (32). Already 24 h post infection (early), assessment of CAMP gene expression showed Lm-infected hMDM1 to have a slightly increased CAMP expression (2.1 ± 1.8-fold), compared to the uninfected control (normalized to 1; dashed line) (Figure 4A). Treatment with CCT and CPT resulted in a 199- (± 41.1) fold and 181- (± 164) fold increase of CAMP. After 6 days (late), an even higher expression of CAMP was detectable after treatment with CCT (587 ± 173-fold), CPT (282-fold) or during Lm infection (3.2 ± 2.1-fold) (Figure 4A). In line, protein expression was assessed by Western blot, demonstrating an increased cathelicidin protein expression during Leishmania infection (early: 1.8 ± 1.0-fold; late: 4.8 ± 4.0-fold). Furthermore, both CCT and CPT induced a significant increase in cathelicidin protein expression at early (25.5 ± 22.2-fold; 101.9 ± 125.4-fold) and at late time points (152.5 ± 149.6-fold; 101.9 ± 125.4-fold), respectively (Figure 4B). In a next step, hMDM1 were pretreated with CCT or CPT, followed by infection with transgenic dsRed-expressing L. major or L. aethiopica. Using flow cytometry, infection rates and parasite survival, as mean fluorescent intensity (MFI), were assessed. Remarkably, treatment with CCT and CPT significantly reduced L. major parasite survival (0.60 ± 0.25; 0.74 ± 0.23) compared to the control (1.00 ± 0.46) (Figures 4C,D). However, the percentage of hMDM1 infected cells, indicated as infection rate, did not change significantly (Figure 4E). Regarding L. aethiopica, similar findings were acquired (data not shown). These data demonstrate that targeting the Vitamin D pathway strongly compromises Leishmania parasite survival, as cathelicidin is strongly upregulated.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Vitamin-D derivatives induce LL37 mediated Leishmania restriction in human primary macrophages. hMDM-1 were generated and treated with calcitriol (CCT) or calcipotriol (CPT) for 24 h, or left untreated. Subsequently, hMDM-1 were infected with transgenic dsRed expressing Lm or Lae (MOI10). After 3 h, extracellular parasites were removed by washing, following incubation at 37°C, 5% CO2. After 24 h (early; black bars) or 6 d (late; white bars) CAMP gene (n = 1–5) (A) and cathelicidin protein expression (n = 5–7) (B) were by qRT-PCR and western blot analysis. CAMP expression was normalized against the house keeping gene GAPHD. Western blots were analyzed by densitometry (ImageJ analysis), normalizing cathelicidin against ß-actin protein expression. Gene and protein expression were normalized to the untreated control, which was set to 1 (dashed line). In addition, parasite survival (C,D) and infection rates of Lm dsRed (E), analyzed by the mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) of the dsRed protein, was assessed by flow cytometry. Western blots, FACS histograms and data, presented as mean ± SD, are representative for at least 3 independent experiments (Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01).

Reduction of Endogenous Cathelicidin in Human Primary Macrophages Promotes Leishmania Infection

The human cathelicidin is expressed by monocytes, macrophages as well as neutrophils (17, 33). We already demonstrated (i) cathelicidin to be higher expressed in skin biopsies of patients with the self-healing cutaneous leishmaniasis compared to healthy controls, (ii) hrLL37 to facilitate apoptosis among promastigotes and amastigotes and (iii) hMDM1 to express cathelicidin to a higher extent comparted to hMDM2. To demonstrate a role for the intracellular, endogenous cathelicidin of macrophages in the elimination of Leishmania parasites, knockdown (KD) experiments were performed. Using an RNAi approach, we could significantly reduce CAMP gene expression (0.15 ± 0.13), compared to the control (1.0 ± 0.0) and non-sense siRNA control (1.04 ± 0.74) (Figure 5A). We were not able to show a clear cathelicidin protein decrease in siRNA treated cells by western blot (data not shown), as cathelicidin is expressed at low levels under steady state conditions. Therefore, we assessed cathelicidin protein expression in knockdown cells by triggering the Vitamin-D pathway first with CPT and CCT, including β-actin as loading control, demonstrating a strong reduction of cathelicidin protein amount, upon CCT and CPT treatment, in the KD cells compared to the control cells (Figure 5B). Next, KD and control cells were infected with Leishmania promastigotes, after which intracellular survival was investigated using an end-point titration assay. We could demonstrate that the number of viable Leishmania in control (284 ± 228 Lm) and non-sense siRNA treated cells (421 ± 303 Lm) did not significantly differ. However, KD of CAMP resulted in a higher parasite survival (544 ± 388 Lm) (Figure 5C), although the level of significance was not reached. In all, these data show cathelicidin to play a role in the restriction of Leishmania promastigote survival.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Knockdown of CAMP in human primary macrophages promotes Leishmania infection. Human pro-inflammatory macrophages, hMDM-1, were treated with non-sense or anti-CAMP siRNA for 7 h. After 2 d cells were harvested and CAMP gene expression and protein expression was assessed by qRT-PCR (n = 9–15) (A) and western blot upon inducing cathelicidin expression using calcitriol (CCT) or calcipotriol (CPT) (B). CAMP expression was normalized against the house keeping gene GAPHD. Western blots were analyzed by densitometry (ImageJ analysis), normalizing cathelicidin against ß-actin protein expression. (C) Subsequently, cells were infected with Lm (MOI10) for 48 h followed by an end-point titration assay (see methods) to assess parasite survival (n = 8–13). Data are presented as mean ± SD and are representative for at least 3 independent experiments (Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ns, not significant).

Discussion

In the present study, we were able to define a role for the human cathelicidin in human leishmaniasis, based on data from clinical samples. In addition, a human primary in vitro cell model was designed to better mimic the in vivo interaction between Leishmania parasites and their host cell, the human macrophage. The two phenotypes of macrophages were demonstrated to interact differently with Leishmania parasites, as in anti-inflammatory macrophages are more susceptible compared to pro-inflammatory human macrophages. Furthermore, the latter pro-inflammatory phenotype expressed the cathelicidin CAMP gene transcript and protein more strongly, which we demonstrated to contribute in controlling Leishmania infection.

Cathelicidin's Antimicrobial Activity

Cathelicidins have already been described to play a role during infection with e.g., M. tuberculosis, Candida albicans, and Cryptosporidum parvum (34). For Leishmania infection animal studies, numerous reports are present. Ramos et al. demonstrated a reduced disease spreading in Leishmania mexicana infected BALB/c mice, which were supplemented with calcitriol (35). Ehrchen et al. reported vitamin D receptor KO mice to be more susceptible to infection then control mice (36). In line, CAMP was demonstrated to be crucial for the local control of cutaneous lesion development and parasite growth, using CAMP KO mice (25). Furthermore, progression of visceral Leishmaniasis was demonstrated to be associated with vitamin D deficiency in dogs (37). Few data however, evaluate the effect of cathelicidin and/or the vitamin D pathway in human patients and/or a human cell model. Das et al. could show cathelicidin to augment anti-leishmanial macrophage activating properties of Amphotericin B (38). In line, we identified a strong upregulation of the human CAMP mRNA transcript in clinical samples from African patients with cutaneous Leishmaniasis, suggesting cathelicidin to play a role in human CL in vivo.

Cathelicidin-Induced Apoptotic Death of Leishmania

We could demonstrate the human cathelicidin to induce an apoptosis-like phenotype in Leishmania parasites, in a dose dependent manner in both L. major and L. aethiopica promastigotes as well as in L. aethiopica amastigotes. Although the underlying mode of action remains elusive, rLL37 was demonstrated to induce phosphatidylserine exposure, a round shaped cell morphology and DNA fragmentation, all characteristics of apoptosis (39). Presumably, the amphipathic α-helical peptide LL37 interacts with the negatively charged phospholipids within the parasitic membrane by electrostatic forces, as described for the carpet and toroidal-pore model (17). Surprisingly, recombinant LL37 did not exert apoptosis-inducing effect on the L. major amastigote life stage, when looking at TUNEL positivity and DNA degradation. Of note, Kulkarni et al. could show antimicrobial peptides to differently induce parasitic cell death, by means of non-apoptotic (class I) or apoptotic (class II) mediated killing (26). One could speculate these mechanisms to be also applicable in our model, which will be the focus of future research.

Amastigotes also differ in their surface charge compared to promastigotes, as Pimenta et al. could show transformation of Leishmania mexicana amazonensis promastigotes to amastigotes to be associated with a shift in the electrophoretic mobility (40). Of general acceptance, is the fact that cationic antimicrobial peptides strongly bind negatively charged phospholipid moieties. Due to the different surface charge between Leishmania life stages, we speculate LL37 to only bind Lm promastigotes resulting in killing, whereas LL37 to be ineffective in binding Lm amastigotes. Overall, our data indicate rLL37 to induce cell death in Leishmania promastigotes.

Cathelicidin in Mammalian Innate Immune Defense

Cathelicidins have gained increasing attention, as being an important mediator during innate immunity. Although cathelicidins are primarily present in human neutrophils, also keratinocytes, monocytes and macrophages harbor this antimicrobial peptide (17, 33, 4143). These cells may indicate where the cathelicidin is originating from upon Leishmania infection. Whether macrophages and keratinocytes exert synergistic effects with regard to cathelicidin production and Leishmania elimination is yet to be defined. Focusing on human primary macrophages, we could demonstrate different macrophage phenotypes to express cathelicidin to a different extent. The human cathelicidin is more abundant in pro-inflammatory macrophages, which may not be surprising as it drives macrophages polarization to a pro-inflammatory phenotype (44). The anti-inflammatory macrophages were more susceptible for infection, a finding in agreement with previous data and studies (45, 46). To define an active role for cathelicidin during Leishmania infection, we modulated its expression. In concordance with previous studies, we could show CAMP expression to be highly enhanced upon activating the vitamin D pathway, using calcitriol or calcipotriol (4750). Interestingly, the intracellular survival of Leishmania parasites was significantly impaired. The group of Agerberth could show LL37 induced expression to be associated with the control of M. tuberculosis in human macrophages (51). Furthermore, phenyl butyrate/vitamin D3 treatment, induced LL37-mediated elimination of M. tuberculosis by macrophages, strengthening the data of the Modlin's group, showing cathelicidin to be required for the 1,25D(3)-triggered antimicrobial activity against intracellular M. tuberculosis (52, 53). In all, triggering the vitamin D pathway in human macrophages, hereby inducing cathelicidin expression, restricts Leishmania survival.

Cathelicidin Contributes to a Reduced Parasite Survival

Vitamin D derivatives induce expression of diverse immune modulators, such as cathelicidin, IL-1ß, etc. (54). To target the CAMP gene more specifically, a RNA interference (RNAi) approach was chosen. Our data showed Leishmania parasite survival to be enhanced. Of note, no significant difference was observed between non-target and anti-CAMP siRNA treatment. One should keep in mind, that all human macrophages were derived from human blood donors, which may differ in gender, immune status, etc., having an impact on host pathogen interactions (55). Furthermore, also transfection as a treatment, may result in RNAi associated immune stimulation through activation of IFN signaling cascades (31). Both aspects, might “bias” our results, with regard to the comparison to the untreated control, as type I interferons have been demonstrated to increase superoxide dismutase (SOD) expression in macrophages, favoring parasite survival (56). Besides the restrictions of the employed methodology, a stronger tendency toward parasite survival, upon CAMP RNAi was observed, suggesting cathelicidin to contribute in restricting Leishmania parasite survival. Indeed, McGwire's group could show the corresponding murine cathelicidin (CRAMP) to control Leishmania parasite infection in a mouse infection model (25). Knockout mice for CRAMP were reported to develop exacerbated lesions combined with a higher parasites distribution upon L. major infection as compared to wild type mice (25). Of note, Gombart et al. showed a vitamin D response element (VDRE) to be conserved in the CAMP promotor of primates. The absence of the VDRE region in the genomes of mouse, rat and canine makes the expression of CRAMP not tunable by the vitamin D pathway (57). In humans, the great potential of cathelicidin is also highlighted in other disease pathologies. A deficiency of cathelicidin may impede the outcome of inflammation in the lungs of patients with severe sarcoidosis (58). Furthermore, Searing et al. propose an increased production of LL37 to prevent patients with atopic dermatitis from herpes infection (59).

Conclusion

In the current study, we revealed the CAMP transcript to be strongly upregulated in skin lesion material from cutaneous leishmaniasis patients. Using an in vitro model, we demonstrated pro-inflammatory human macrophages to be able to control Leishmania infection more efficiently compared to anti-inflammatory macrophages, to which cathelicidin expression is contributing. In addition to the NO-based anti-leishmanial mouse effector mechanism, we propose that vitamin D-inducible cathelicidin expression in combination with GM-CSF polarized macrophages to be a unique mechanism, which contributes to the restriction of Leishmania in human macrophages.

Materials and Methods

Leishmania Strains

L. major (Lm, MHOM_IL_81_FEBNI), L. aethiopica (Lae, MHOM/ET/72/L100 Z14), and the transgenic Lm dsRed (construct pSSUint-DsRed was a kind gift from Dr. Toni Aebischer, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany) and Lae dsRed promastigotes were cultured at 27°C in biphasic Novy-Nicolle-McNeal blood agar medium as described (60). Of note, all viable promastigotes express the transgenic dsRed protein. Upon transformation into the amastigote life stage, a 1 log-scale higher dsRed fluorescence is present, due to the high-level expression in the amastigote life stage (31). Logarithmic-phase or stationary-phase promastigotes were obtained after 2 (log-phase) or 7 (stat-phase) days of culture, respectively. Lm and Lae axenic amastigotes were generated by incubating log-phase promastigotes in pH 5.5 at 33°C and isolated using a discontinuous Histopaque® 1119 (Sigma Aldrich, Germany) density gradient as described (61).

Assessing Apoptosis

To assess apoptosis, Lm and Lae promastigotes, which resided in a logarithmic growth phase, were treated with 30 and 60 ng/ml hrLL37 (PeptaNova GmbH, Sandhausen, Germany) for 72 h. Leishmania axenic amastigotes were treated with 10 and 100 ng/ml hrLL37 or 25 μM staurosporine for 24 h. Subsequently, DNA fragmentation was assessed by flow cytometry or immunofluorescence imaging using an in situ cell-death detection kit, based on terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL), as described (30). Exposure of phosphatidylserine (PS) was assessed by AnnexinA5 binding using flow cytometry.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

The study was approved by National Ethical Clearance Committee at Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Ministry of Science and Technology with ethical approval No. 310/227/2007, approved on 30/05/2011. The ethical approval was renewed by the National Ethical Clearance Committee at Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Ministry of Science and Technology on 26/03/2016 with Ref. number 3.10/003/2015. Written informed consent was obtained from study participants.

Sample Collection

Clinically suspected CL patients, who visited the Ankesha and Kela health centers consented to participate in the study, were clinically examined for CL. Ankesha and Kela health centers are found in the leishmaniasis endemic regions in East Gojam Zones of Amhara region and in Gurage zone of Southern regional state of Ethiopia, respectively. Patients, diagnosed for active CL, were recruited to this study prior to treatment. Diagnosis was confirmed by microscopy or culture from skin lesion scraping. After the skin lesion was cleaned, the boarder of lesion was collected for microscopy analysis. Healthy controls were recruited from patients admitted for minor surgery ALERT hospital. All study participants were seronegative for HIV. Skin biopsies from CL patients were taken from the border site of the lesion, using a disposable punch (3 mm in diameter). Local anesthesia with 2% lidocaine was applied. Control skin biopsies were obtained from the leftover samples taken for skin graft of selected individuals (without infection or immunological disorder) visiting the ALERT hospital surgery department.

In addition, from skin samples Leishmania promastigotes were cultivated. DNA was extracted from culture and biopsy samples using QIAamp® DNA Mini Kit according to manufacturer's procedure. PCR amplification was performed with 100 ng template and the HotStarTaq Plus Master Mix Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) using the primers Lae species-specific primers V5F 5′-GGTGATGTGCCCGAGTGCA-3′ and V10R 5′-CGTGCACATCAGCACATGGG-3′.

Generation of Human Monocyte-Derived Macrophages

Human peripheral mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from buffy coats (DRK-Blutspendedienst Hessen GmbH) by passage over a Leukocyte Separation Medium gradient as described previously (30). Monocytes, obtained by plastic adherence or CD14 selection were incubated either with 10 ng/ml rhGM-CSF (Leukine® Sanofi-Aventis, Bridgewater, US) or 30 ng/ml rhM-CSF (R&D Systems, Abingdon, UK) for a period of 5 to 7 d at 37°C, 5% CO2 to generate hMDM1 or hMDM2, respectively. Cells were generated in 6 w plates or in 25 cm2 culture flasks and were detached by cooling cells down on ice, following detachment with a cell scraper. Experimental data, conducted with monocytes obtained from human donors, are depicted as dot plots, in which each dot presents data from a single donor.

Infection of hMDM With Leishmania Parasites

HMDM were harvested and transferred into 1.5 ml micro-centrifuge tubes, to which cells do not attach. The cells were co-incubated with stationary phase Lm or Lae promastigotes or axenic amastigotes at a MOI ratio of 1:10 in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% heat inactivated fetal calf serum, 50 μM β-mercaptoethanol (all from Sigma Aldrich), 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin, 10 mM HEPES (all from Biochrom) for 3 h at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere in a CO2 incubator. Extracellular parasites were removed by centrifugation and washing the cells. During infection experiments, cathelicidin expression was induced by incubation of hMDM with 100 nM calcitriol or calcipotriol for 24 h. For transgenic LmdsRed flow cytometry was used to analyze infection rates. These transgenic parasites can also be used as a model to follow the parasite propagation, which is based on the development and replication of amastigotes. The LmdsRed promastigotes increase their fluorescence intensity when transforming into amastigotes, which enables the quantification of the parasite propagation by measuring the dsRed mean fluorescence intensity using FACS (62, 63).

Flow Cytometry

  1. FACS analysis of Leishmania parasites was performed as described Wenzel et al. (61). Apoptosis, among parasites, was assessed by staining with AnnexinA5-Alexa Fluor 647 using a Ca2+ rich buffer.

  2. For phenotyping hMDM by flow cytometry, hMDM were washed in FACS-Buffer (PBS supplemented with 1% FCS, 1% human serum and 1% BSA) and incubated with anti-CD14-FITC (1:100, IgG2b), anti-CD163-PE (1:50, IgG1, GHI/61), or anti-MHC II-PerCP (1:100, IgG2a, L243) for 30 min on ice in the dark. Corresponding isotype controls were used in the same dilution (all antibodies and isotype controls were from BD Pharmingen, Heidelberg, Germany). The cells were washed in FACS-Buffer and analyzed by flow cytometry.

  3. To assess parasite survival, Leishmania (dsRed+) infected hMDM were washed in FACS-buffer and infection rate (% of dsRed+ hMDM) and the parasite load (mean fluorescent intensity) were assessed by flow cytometry. Upon analyzing, at least 10,000 events (human cells) or 20,000 (parasites) were recorded using a BD LSR II flow cytometer (BD Bioscience, Heidelberg, Germany). Data were analyzed by BD FACS Diva or FlowJo software (Treestar).

Transfection of Primary Human Cells With siRNA

CD14 selected monocytes were differentiated into hMDM1 by addition of hrGM-CSF over a period of 6 days. On day 3, the medium was refreshed with new growth factors. At day 6, cells were washed with RPMI, without supplements, and 1 ml prewarmed RPMI was given to the hMDM. For transfection 80 pmole of 20 μM siRNA (LL-37-siRNA: ON-TARGET plus SMART pool Human CAMP (LL-37) from Thermo Scientific Dharmacon, Bonn, Germany; nonsense siRNA: Stealth RNAi siRNA Negative Control from Invitrogen, Darmstadt, Germany) were mixed with 20 μl of Stemfect Buffer and 4.6 μl of Stemfect Reagent were mixed with 20 μl Stemfect Buffer (Stemfect RNA Transfection kit from Stemgent, San Diego, USA). Within 5 min, both compounds were mixed and subsequently incubated for 20 min at room temperature. The transfection mixture was added to the cells for 7 h at 37°C. Cells were subsequently washed and further incubated 2 days at 37°C in Complete Medium before harvesting.

RNA Isolation, Reverse-Transcription PCR, and qRT-PCR

RNA extraction and reverse-transcription, of either human primary cells or skin tissue, were performed using the RNeasy Plus Mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and the ImProm-II Reverse Transcription system (Promega, Mannheim, Germany), respectively, according to the manufacturers' instructions. Differential gene expression in primary macrophages was analyzed by quantitative real-time PCR using the LightCycler® 2.0 instrument (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) and LightCycler® FastStart DNA MasterPLUS SYBR Green I kit (Roche Applied Science, Mannheim, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Differential gene expression in skin tissue was analyzed by quantitative real-time PCR using the Rotor Gene-3000 system and Rotor-Gene SYBR Green I kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The LL-37 gene (5′-GGA CCC AGA CAC GCC AAA-3′; 3′-GCA CAC TGT CTC CTT CAC TGT GA-5′) expression was normalized to the housekeeping gene GAPDH (5′-GAG TCA ACG GAT TTG GTC GT-3′; 3′-TTG ATT TTG GAG GGA TCT CG-5′) using the ΔΔCT–method.

Western Blot

A total number of 0.5 × 106 hMDM were lysed in Lämmli-Buffer (A. bidest supplemented with 0.7 M Glycerol, 1.7% SDS, 0.1 M DTT and 30 μM Bromphenol blue), denaturated at 95°C for 10 min and loaded onto a 15% SDS-polyacrylamide gel. The separated proteins were blotted onto a nitrocellulose transfer membrane at 145 mA constant voltage for 1 h. The membrane was blocked with WB-Block-Solution (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom) washed with WB-Wash-Buffer (A. bidest supplemented with 0.5% Tween, 0.14 M NaCl, 10 mM Tris, 1 mM NaN3; pH 8) and subsequently incubated with an anti-LL37 primary antibody (kindly provided by Prof. B. Agerberth) overnight at 4°C. After extensive washing, the membrane was incubated with a HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (1:1000, from Cell Signaling, Danvers, USA) for 1 h at room temperature. The membrane was washed once more and the protein bands were detected using an ECL substrate (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom). Using ImageJ, densitometry analysis was performed to quantify the intensities of the protein bands.

End-Point Titration Assay

The amount of viable intracellular parasites inside hMDM1 (control, non-sense siRNA or anti-CAMP treated) was determined. After 3 h of infection, MOI10, cells were washed to remove extracellular parasites. After 48 h of infection, the end-point titration assay was carried out. Therefore, cell scraper detached hMDM1 were counted and 2000 hMDM1 were seeded, in quadruplicates, in a 96 w plate containing biphasic Novy-Nicolle-McNeal blood agar medium. Wells were serial diluted (factor 1.5) for 24 times. Plates were incubated for 7–10 days at 27°C. By microscopical analysis, plates were analyzed to assess at which dilution growth was seen. Based on the dilution factor and the amount of hMDM1 that were seeded in the first well, the amount of parasites per 1,000 hMDM1 was calculated (63). The formula applied to calculate the amount of parasites per 1,000 macrophages is 1.5x/2 were x is the dilution step in which still parasite growth was observed.

Statistical Analysis

Numerical data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). For statistical analysis, data were tested for their normal distribution, using the D'Agostino and Pearson omnibus normality test. If passed, statistical analysis was determined by a paired Student t-test. If data were not normally distributed or in case to few biological replicates were present to test normal distribution, a non-parametric test (Mann–Whitney test or Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test) was used. The software Graph-Pad Prism version 4 was used, by which * indicates statistically difference at p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

Data Availability Statement

All datasets generated for this study are included in the article/supplementary material.

Ethics Statement

The study was approved by National Ethical Clearance Committee at Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Ministry of Science and Technology with ethical approval No. 310/227/2007, approved on 30/05/2011. The ethical approval was renewed by the National Ethical Clearance Committee at Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Ministry of Science and Technology on 26/03/2016 with Ref. number 3.10/003/2015. Written informed consent was obtained from study participants.

Author Contributions

GZ, PC, EB, BW, UW, MC, and MA helped with substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work, or the acquisition, analysis or interpretation of data for the work. GZ, PC, BA, RK, NR, and UR helped drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank K. Strele and S. Diebold for excellent technical assistance.

Footnotes

Funding. Our research was supported by grants from the German Research Foundation ZA533 5-1 (GZ) the Carl Zeiss Foundation (GZ) and was supported by the LOEWE Center DRUID [Novel Drug Targets against Poverty-Related and Neglected Tropical Infectious Diseases (project D3 GZ)].

References

  • 1.Dietze R, Carvalho SF, Valli LC, Berman J, Brewer T, Milhous W, et al. Phase 2 trial of WR6026, an orally administered 8-aminoquinoline, in the treatment of visceral leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania chagasi. Am J Trop Med Hyg. (2001) 65:685–9. 10.4269/ajtmh.2001.65.685 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.WHO WHO 2014 Leishmaniasis. Fact sheet N°375. (2014). Available online at: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs375/en/
  • 3.Kumar R, Engwerda C. Vaccines to prevent leishmaniasis. Clin Transl Immunol. (2014) 3:e13. 10.1038/cti.2014.4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Boelaert M, Meheus F, Robays J, Lutumba P. Socio–economic aspects of neglected diseases: sleeping sickness and visceral leishmaniasis. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. (2010) 104:535–42. 10.1179/136485910X12786389891641 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Benoit M, Desnues B, Mege J-L. Macrophage polarization in bacterial infections. J Immunol. (2008) 181:3733–9. 10.4049/jimmunol.181.6.3733 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Green SJ, Meltzer MS, Hibbs JB, Nacy CA. Activated macrophages destroy intracellular Leishmania major amastigotes by an L-arginine-dependent killing mechanism. J Immunol. (1990) 144:278–83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Iniesta V, Carcelén J, Molano I, Peixoto PM, Redondo E, Parra P, et al. Arginase I induction during Leishmania major infection mediates the development of disease. Infect Immun. (2005) 73:6085–90. 10.1128/IAI.73.9.6085-6090.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wanasen N, Soong L. L-arginine metabolism and its impact on host immunity against Leishmania infection. Immunol Res. (2008) 41:15–25. 10.1007/s12026-007-8012-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.El-Gayar S, Thüring-Nahler H, Pfeilschifter J, Röllinghoff M, Bogdan C. Translational control of inducible nitric oxide synthase by IL-13 and arginine availability in inflammatory macrophages. J Immunol. (2003) 171:4561–8. 10.4049/jimmunol.171.9.4561 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rutschman R, Lang R, Hesse M, Ihle JN, Wynn TA, Murray PJ. Cutting edge: Stat6-dependent substrate depletion regulates nitric oxide production. J Immunol. (2001) 166:2173–7. 10.4049/jimmunol.166.4.2173 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Liew FY, Millott S, Parkinson C, Palmer RM, Moncada S. Macrophage killing of Leishmania parasite in vivo is mediated by nitric oxide from L-arginine. J Immunol. (1990) 144:4794–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Green SJ, Nacy CA, Meltzer MS. Cytokine-induced synthesis of nitrogen oxides in macrophages: a protective host response to Leishmania and other intracellular pathogens. J Leukoc Biol. (1991) 50:93–103. 10.1002/jlb.50.1.93 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mestas J, Hughes CCW. Of mice and not men: differences between mouse and human immunology. J Immunol. (2004) 172:2731–8. 10.4049/jimmunol.172.5.2731 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mossalayi MD, Arock M, Mazier D, Vincendeau P, Vouldoukis I. The human immune response during cutaneous leishmaniasis: NO problem. Parasitol Tdy. (1999) 15:342–5. 10.1016/S0169-4758(99)01477-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Amorim FM, Rodrigues YK, Barbosa TP, Néris PL, Caldas JP, Sousa SC, et al. Morita-Baylis-Hillman adduct shows in vitro activity against Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis associated with a reduction in IL-6 and IL-10 but independent of nitric oxide. Parasitology. (2013) 140:29–38. 10.1017/S0031182012001291 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lima-Junior DS, Costa DL, Carregaro V, Cunha LD, Silva AL, Mineo TW, et al. Inflammasome-derived IL-1β production induces nitric oxide–mediated resistance to Leishmania. Nat Med. (2013) 19:909–915. 10.1038/nm.3221 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Dürr UH, Sudheendra US, Ramamoorthy A. LL-37, the only human member of the cathelicidin family of antimicrobial peptides. Biochim Biophys Acta. (2006) 1758:1408–25. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2006.03.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Schittek B, Paulmann M, Senyürek I, Steffen H. The role of antimicrobial peptides in human skin and in skin infectious diseases. Infect Disord Drug Targets. (2008) 8:135–43. 10.2174/1871526510808030135 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bals R, Wang X, Zasloff M, Wilson JM. The peptide antibiotic LL-37/hCAP-18 is expressed in epithelia of the human lung where it has broad antimicrobial activity at the airway surface. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (1998) 95:9541–6. 10.1073/pnas.95.16.9541 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hancock RE, Lehrer R. Cationic peptides: a new source of antibiotics. Trends Biotechnol. (1998) 16:82–8. 10.1016/S0167-7799(97)01156-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Travis SM, Anderson NN, Forsyth WR, Espiritu C, Conway BD, Greenberg EP, et al. Bactericidal activity of mammalian cathelicidin-derived peptides. Infect Immun. (2000) 68:2748–55. 10.1128/IAI.68.5.2748-2755.2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Dorschner RA, Pestonjamasp VK, Tamakuwala S, Ohtake T, Rudisill J, Nizet V, et al. Cutaneous injury induces the release of cathelicidin anti-microbial peptides active against group A Streptococcus. J Invest Dermatol. (2001) 117:91–7. 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2001.01340.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Howell MD, Jones JF, Kisich KO, Streib JE, Gallo RL, Leung DY. Selective killing of vaccinia virus by LL-37: implications for eczema vaccinatum. J Immunol. (2004) 172:1763–7. 10.4049/jimmunol.172.3.1763 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sonawane A, Santos JC, Mishra BB, Jena P, Progida C, Sorensen OE, et al. Cathelicidin is involved in the intracellular killing of mycobacteria in macrophages. Cell Microbiol. (2011) 13:1601–17. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2011.01644.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kulkarni MM, Barbi J, McMaster WR, Gallo RL, Satoskar AR, McGwire BS. Mammalian antimicrobial peptide influences control of cutaneous Leishmania infection. Cell Microbiol. (2011) 13:913–23. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2011.01589.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kulkarni MM, McMaster WR, Kamysz W, McGwire BS. Antimicrobial peptide-induced apoptotic death of leishmania results from calcium-dependent, caspase-independent mitochondrial toxicity. J Biol Chem. (2009) 284:15496–504. 10.1074/jbc.M809079200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Dos Santos JC, Heinhuis B, Gomes RS, Damen MS, Real F, Mortara RA, et al. Cytokines and microbicidal molecules regulated by IL-32 in THP-1-derived human macrophages infected with New World Leishmania species. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. (2017) 11:e0005413. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005413 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ramos R, Domingues L, Gama M. LL37, a human antimicrobial peptide with immunomodulatory properties. In: Science Against Microbial Pathogens: Communicating Current Research and Technological Advances. (2011). p. 915–25. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zeth K, Sancho-Vaello E. The human antimicrobial peptides dermcidin and LL-37 show novel distinct pathways in membrane interactions. Front Chem. (2017) 5:86. 10.3389/fchem.2017.00086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Crauwels P, Bohn R, Thomas M, Gottwalt S, Jäckel F, Krämer S, et al. Apoptotic-like Leishmania exploit the host's autophagy machinery to reduce T-cell-mediated parasite elimination. Autophagy. (2015) 11:285–97. 10.1080/15548627.2014.998904 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Meng Z, Lu M. RNA Interference-induced innate immunity, off-target effect, or immune adjuvant? Front Immunol. (2017) 8:331 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00331 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kulkarni NN, Yi Z, Huehnken C, Agerberth B, Gudmundsson GH. Phenylbutyrate induces cathelicidin expression via the vitamin D receptor: linkage to inflammatory and growth factor cytokines pathways. Mol Immunol. (2015) 63:530–9. 10.1016/j.molimm.2014.10.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Xhindoli D, Pacor S, Benincasa M, Scocchi M, Gennaro R, Tossi A. The human cathelicidin LL-37–A pore-forming antibacterial peptide and host-cell modulator. Biochim Biophys Acta. (2016) 1858:546–66. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2015.11.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Nizet V, Gallo RL. Cathelicidins and innate defense against invasive bacterial infection. Scand J Infect Dis. (2003) 35:670–6. 10.1080/00365540310015629 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ramos-Martínez E, Villaseñor-Cardoso MI, López-Vancell MR, García-Vázquez FJ, Pérez-Torres A, Salaiza-Suazo N, et al. Effect of 1,25(OH)2D3 on BALB/c mice infected with Leishmania mexicana. Exp Parasitol. (2013) 134:413–21. 10.1016/j.exppara.2013.05.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ehrchen J, Helming L, Varga G, Pasche B, Loser K, Gunzer M, et al. Vitamin D receptor signaling contributes to susceptibility to infection with Leishmania major. FASEB J. (2007) 21:3208–18. 10.1096/fj.06-7261com [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Rodriguez-Cortes A, Martori C, Martinez-Florez A, Clop A, Amills M, Kubejko J, et al. Canine leishmaniasis progression is associated with vitamin D deficiency. Sci Rep. (2017) 7:3346. 10.1038/s41598-017-03662-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Das S, Sardar AH, Abhishek K, Kumar A, Rabidas VN, Das P. Cathelicidin augments VDR-dependent anti-leishmanial immune response in Indian Post-Kala-Azar Dermal Leishmaniasis. Int Immunopharmacol. (2017) 50:130–8. 10.1016/j.intimp.2017.06.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Elmore S. Apoptosis: a review of programmed cell death. Toxicol Pathol. (2007) 35:495–516. 10.1080/01926230701320337 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Pimenta PF, de Souza W. Leishmania mexicana amazonensis: surface charge of amastigote and promastigote forms. Exp Parasitol. (1983) 56:194–206. 10.1016/0014-4894(83)90063-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Braff MH, Zaiou M, Fierer J, Nizet V, Gallo RL. Keratinocyte production of cathelicidin provides direct activity against bacterial skin pathogens. Infect Immun. (2005) 73:6771–81. 10.1128/IAI.73.10.6771-6781.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Braff MH, Di Nardo A, Gallo RL. Keratinocytes store the antimicrobial peptide cathelicidin in lamellar bodies. J Invest Dermatol. (2005) 124:394–400. 10.1111/j.0022-202X.2004.23443.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Agier J, Efenberger M, Brzezinska-Błaszczyk E. Cathelicidin impact on inflammatory cells. Cent J Immunol. (2015) 40:225–35. 10.5114/ceji.2015.51359 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.van der Does AM, Beekhuizen H, Ravensbergen B, Vos T, Ottenhoff TH, van Dissel JT, et al. LL-37 directs macrophage differentiation toward macrophages with a proinflammatory signature. J Immunol. (2010) 185:1442–9. 10.4049/jimmunol.1000376 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Neu C, Sedlag A, Bayer C, Förster S, Crauwels P, Niess JH, et al. CD14-dependent monocyte isolation enhances phagocytosis of listeria monocytogenes by proinflammatory, GM-CSF-derived macrophages. PLoS ONE. (2013) 8:e66898. 10.1371/journal.pone.0066898 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Bayer C, Varani S, Wang L, Walther P, Zhou S, Straschewski S, et al. Human cytomegalovirus infection of M1 and M2 macrophages triggers inflammation and autologous T-cell proliferation. J Virol. (2013) 87:67–79. 10.1128/JVI.01585-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Wang TT, Nestel FP, Bourdeau V, Nagai Y, Wang Q, Liao J, et al. Cutting edge: 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 is a direct inducer of antimicrobial peptide gene expression. J Immunol. (2004) 173:2909–12. 10.4049/jimmunol.173.5.2909 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Segaert S. Vitamin D regulation of cathelicidin in the skin: toward a renaissance of vitamin D in dermatology? J Invest Dermatol. (2008) 128:773–5. 10.1038/jid.2008.35 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Gombart AF, O'Kelly J, Saito T, Koeffler HP. Regulation of the CAMP gene by 1,25(OH)2D3 in various tissues. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. (2007) 103:552–7. 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2006.12.095 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Gombart AF. The vitamin D-antimicrobial peptide pathway and its role in protection against infection. Future Microbiol. (2009) 4:1151–65. 10.2217/fmb.09.87 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Bowdish DM, Davidson DJ, Scott MG, Hancock RE. Immunomodulatory activities of small host defense peptides. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. (2005) 49:1727–32. 10.1128/AAC.49.5.1727-1732.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Mily A, Rekha RS, Kamal SM, Akhtar E, Sarker P, Rahim Z, et al. Oral intake of phenylbutyrate with or without vitamin D3upregulates the cathelicidin LL-37 in human macrophages: a dose finding study for treatment of tuberculosis. BMC Pulm Med. (2013) 13:23. 10.1186/1471-2466-13-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Liu PT, Stenger S, Tang DH, Modlin RL. Cutting edge: vitamin D-mediated human antimicrobial activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis is dependent on the induction of cathelicidin. J Immunol. (2007) 179:2060–3. 10.4049/jimmunol.179.4.2060 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Verway M, Bouttier M, Wang TT, Carrier M, Calderon M, An BS, et al. Vitamin D induces interleukin-1β expression: paracrine macrophage epithelial signaling controls M. tuberculosis infection. PLoS Pathog. (2013) 9:e1003407. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003407 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Garelnabi M, Taylor-Smith LM, Bielska E, Hall RA, Stones D, May RC. Quantifying donor-to-donor variation in macrophage responses to the human fungal pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans. PLoS ONE. (2018) 13:e0194615. 10.1371/journal.pone.0194615 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Rossi M, Fasel N. How to master the host immune system? Leishmania parasites have the solutions! Int Immunol. (2018) 30:103–11. 10.1093/intimm/dxx075 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Gombart AF, Borregaard N, Koeffler HP. Human cathelicidin antimicrobial peptide (CAMP) gene is a direct target of the vitamin D receptor and is strongly up-regulated in myeloid cells by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. FASEB J. (2005) 19:1067–77. 10.1096/fj.04-3284com [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Barna BP, Culver DA, Kanchwala A, Singh RJ, Huizar I, Abraham S, et al. Alveolar macrophage cathelicidin deficiency in severe sarcoidosis. J Innate Immun. (2012) 4:569–78. 10.1159/000339149 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Searing DA, Leung DY. Vitamin D in atopic dermatitis, asthma and allergic diseases. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. (2010) 30:397–409. 10.1016/j.iac.2010.05.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.van Zandbergen G, Bollinger A, Wenzel A, Kamhawi S, Voll R, Klinger M, et al. Leishmania disease development depends on the presence of apoptotic promastigotes in the virulent inoculum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2006) 103:13837–42. 10.1073/pnas.0600843103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Wenzel UA, Bank E, Florian C, Förster S, Zimara N, Steinacker J, et al. Leishmania major parasite stage-dependent host cell invasion and immune evasion. FASEB J. (2012) 26:29–39. 10.1096/fj.11-184895 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Misslitz A, Mottram JC, Overath P, Aebischer T. Targeted integration into a rRNA locus results in uniform and high level expression of transgenes in Leishmania amastigotes. Mol Biochem Parasitol. (2000) 107:251–61. 10.1016/S0166-6851(00)00195-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Stenger S, van Zandbergen G. Measuring the killing of intracellular pathogens: Leishmania. Curr Protoc Essent Lab Tech. (2011) 2011:Chapter 14:Unit14.23. 10.1002/0471142735.im1423s93 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All datasets generated for this study are included in the article/supplementary material.


Articles from Frontiers in Immunology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES