Impact of Endemic Infections on HIV Susceptibility in Sub-Saharan Africa

Abstract

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) remains a leading cause of global morbidity with the highest burden in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). For reasons that are incompletely understood, the likelihood of HIV transmission is several fold higher in SSA than in higher income countries, and most of these infections are acquired by young women. Residents of SSA are also exposed to a variety of endemic infections, such as malaria and various helminthiases that could influence mucosal and systemic immunology. Since these immune parameters are important determinants of HIV acquisition and progression, this review explores the possible effects of endemic infections on HIV susceptibility and summarizes current knowledge of the epidemiology and underlying immunological mechanisms by which endemic infections could impact HIV acquisition. A better understanding of the interaction between endemic infections and HIV may enhance HIV prevention programs in SSA.

Introduction and overview

Despite the ability of antiretroviral therapy (ART) to reduce HIV infection at an individual level, its impact on HIV transmission at a population level has been limited. In 2017 the global number of new HIV infections remained at 1.8 million, which lags far behind the pace needed to reach the UNAIDS Fast-Track Target of fewer than 500,000 new infections per year by 2020 [1]. Notably, over 36 million people are currently living with HIV [1], underscoring the importance of developing new and affordable HIV prevention strategies with the potential for broad scale up.

Individuals from lower-income countries, particularly those in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), exhibit a nearly 4-fold elevated risk of male-to-female HIV transmission per sexual contact compared to higher income countries (0.3% versus 0.08%) [2]. The reason for this difference is not clear, but likely relates to numerous factors that may include circulating virus characteristics, socio-behavioral patterns and environmental factors. Additional parameters that have been linked to HIV transmission risk and may be more common in individuals from SSA include the use of injectable hormonal contraceptives [3], alterations in the vaginal microbiome including bacterial vaginosis (BV) [4], and a higher population prevalence of sexually transmitted infections such as herpes simplex type 2 (HSV-2) [5, 6].

Even within SSA there is tremendous regional heterogeneity in HIV transmission. For example, in East African countries the incidence of HIV is increased almost ten-fold near Lake Victoria [5]. A possible reason for this regional heterogeneity may be the biological impact on HIV susceptibility of common non-genital infections, such as malaria, helminthiases, tuberculosis and others [6]. The prevalence of these infections can vary considerably within a region, and they have been previously demonstrated to increase the blood HIV viral load in infected, ART-naïve people, rendering it more likely that co-infected individuals will transmit HIV to their partners [7, 8].

To date, the effect of such endemic diseases on HIV transmission has been explored mainly in the context of co-infection in HIV-infected individuals and predominantly by looking at the impact of co-infections and their treatment on blood HIV load [7–9], because viral load is the key determinant of HIV transmission probability from an HIV-infected person to their HIV-uninfected sexual partner [10]. However, much less is understood about the potential impact of endemic infections on an HIV-uninfected individual’s HIV susceptibility, despite accumulating epidemiological and biological evidence for such effects. Given that endemic pathogens in SSA infect many HIV at-risk individuals, a clear understanding of their potential influence on HIV susceptibility may aid in the development of better disease prevention strategies, as is envisioned in recent proposals for integrated disease control in high disease burden regions [11–14].

This review focuses on the effects of non-STI endemic pathogens (Table 1), many of which cause chronic and asymptomatic infection, on HIV susceptibility in SSA. First, we review the biological characteristics that define HIV susceptibility, specifically focusing on the sexual acquisition of HIV in the genital tract and rectum. Secondly, we discuss the evidence available to date on the relationship between select endemic infections and HIV susceptibility using malaria and helminth infections as examples. Finally, we discuss whether and how treatment and prevention of endemic infections could help reduce HIV acquisition and ultimately alleviate HIV burden in SSA.

Table 1.

Endemic infections that may enhance HIV susceptibility in Sub-Saharan Africa

Infection	Main causative agent (s) in SSA	Primary tissue site(s) involved
Malaria	Plasmodium spp.- mainly P. falciparum	Blood, liver
Soil transmitted helminthiases	Ascaris, Trichuris, hookworms (e.g. Necator americanus)	Gut lumen
Lymphatic filariasis	Wuchereria bancrofti	Lymphatic system, blood
Schistosomiasis	Schistosoma spp.
Intestinal schistosomiasis	S. mansoni	Blood vessels surrounding gut, gut mucosa
Genitourinary schistosomiasis	S. haematobium	Blood vessels surrounding genitourinary tract, genitourinary mucosa

Biological characteristics that define HIV susceptibility

Mucosal HIV acquisition: sites of exposure and immunological correlates of risk

HIV is most commonly (85%) acquired via contact with virus-containing bodily fluids through unprotected sex [15], and heterosexual sex accounts for the majority of sexual HIV transmission in SSA [15–21]. In many SSA countries young women are at especially high risk of HIV acquisition, with an incidence 3-4 times higher than their male peers [22–24]. The high incidence of HIV in women from SSA is difficult to reconcile with the relatively low per-contact probability of male-to-female HIV transmission, which is estimated to range from 1/250 to 1/2500 [2]. While this low transmission likelihood is attributable to several effective defense mechanisms in the female genital tract [25], community-wide factors that modify HIV susceptibility can still result in a high population HIV incidence. These modifying factors are discussed below.

HIV acquisition in the female genital tract

The female genital tract (FGT) is often sub-divided into the lower genital tract (the vagina and ectocervix), which is covered by a squamous epithelium, and the upper genital tract, which is covered with columnar epithelium (the endocervix, uterus, fallopian tubes and ovaries). The lower genital tract and the “transition zone” between the lower and upper genital mucosa have traditionally been thought of as the main sites of HIV acquisition, although studies in the macaque model suggest that both the entire upper and lower genital mucosa may be susceptible to HIV [26–28].

In primate models [15, 29, 30], virus crosses the genital epithelium within several hours of exposure to an infectious inoculum, either through breaches in the mucosa or by diffusing across an intact stratified squamous epithelium, and can be found in proximity to target cells in the lamina propria [31], although in theory direct dissemination to the bloodstream is possible if the viral challenge dose is high. Next, a “founder” population of infected cells, composed mainly of CD4+ T cells, expands within the mucosa for approximately the first week after challenge, followed by dissemination to tissue draining lymph nodes; once here, host infection has been irreversibly established and the virus rapidly spreads throughout the body, replicating at particularly high levels within gut-associated lymph tissues [28, 32–34]. Notably, some studies suggest an even rapider scenario of viral dissemination to distal organs occurring within a few hours after exposure [35].

Thus, the first week after exposure, also termed the “window of HIV vulnerability”, is likely to be critical for the success of preventive strategies that could be deployed to stop viral infection and spread [36]. Some of these strategies, such as ART-based pre-exposure and post-exposure prophylaxis, which limit local virus replication, have already shown efficacy in humans [37, 38]. Other approaches, such as mucosal induction of antiviral pathways [39], blockade of target cell migration [40–42], induction of broadly neutralizing antibodies [43] and stimulation of T cell-mediated responses [44] so far have shown promising results and could potentially exert a strong impact on the HIV window of vulnerability. Antiviral pathway functionality and target cell migration mechanisms can be modified by various biological factors, such as co-infections, and are therefore important contributors to changes in HIV susceptibility.

HIV acquisition in the male genital tract

Among heterosexual men, the penis is the key organ at which virtually all HIV infections are acquired. Throughout the penile tissue, abundant macrophages and Langerhans cells comprise the main antigen presenting cells and together with plasma and T cells mediate adaptive immune responses [45–52]. In heterosexual men, circumcision reduces HIV incidence by 50-60% [22–24], suggesting that the foreskin is an important site of HIV acquisition, although other penile tissues such as the urethra may also play a role in HIV acquisition [53, 54]. Since the foreskin tissues are not mucosal in the traditional sense because they lack mucus-secreting capacity and are keratinized, it is possible that the effects of endemic mucosal infections on penile HIV susceptibility might be quite different to vaginal and rectal tissues. In addition to the anatomical differences, differences in CD4+ T cell trafficking to the foreskin versus the female genital tissues may also explain differences in HIV susceptibility of men versus women [48, 55].

HIV acquisition in the rectum

Both men and women may acquire HIV across the rectal mucosa during receptive anal intercourse (AI). Unprotected AI is common in SSA [56] and is a high risk factor for HIV infection [57]. The rectal mucosa is a gateway to a large pool of HIV target cells, such as CCR5+ macrophages and CD4 T cells, with high proportions of Th17 cells [58, 59]. Notably, recent research indicates that compared to people who had never engaged in AI, the rectal mucosa of individuals engaging in unprotected AI also exhibits a phenotype indicative of elevated inflammation and mucosal injury [58]. This is important, since multiple endemic infections in SSA involve the gut and could therefore enhance HIV susceptibility via this route.

Cellular correlates of HIV susceptibility

At the cellular level, some of the major determinants of susceptibility to HIV infection include the surface expression of the primary HIV receptor (CD4), expression of the co-receptors CCR5 or CXCR4, the production of various innate antiviral factors, and the physical localization of the cell. HIV transmission via mucosal routes is almost always mediated by CCR5-tropic rather than CXCR4-tropic viral variants, despite the frequent presence of both variants in the genital secretions of an infected person and the expression of both CXCR4 and CCR5 on mucosal CD4+ T cells from an uninfected sex partner [60–62]. The reason for such strong selection bias in favour of CCR5-tropism is likely multifactorial [60, 61], and is beyond the scope of this review. The activation state of mucosal CD4 T cells is a critical determinant of HIV susceptibility, with activated effector and memory CD4 T cells constituting preferential targets [59, 63, 64], and is often assessed experimentally through the surface expression of CD38, HLA-DR, Ki-67 and/or CD69 [65, 66].

In addition to their activation status and co-receptor expression, CD4 T helper (Th) cells can be classified into multiple subsets based on their immune functions and the expression of specific transcription factors and surface receptors, and there are clear subset differences in susceptibility to HIV [59, 67]. The main mucosal target for HIV infection is Th17 cells, which abundantly express HIV receptors/co-receptors and integrin α4β7, but lack CCR5 ligand expression and exhibit reduced intrinsic capacity to inhibit HIV replication [68]. Th17 cells are primarily involved in host mucosal defense against bacteria and yeast, and are defined based on expression of the transcription factors retinoic acid related orphan receptor (ROR)-γt/RORC and ROR-α, the surface expression of the chemokine receptor CCR6, and the production of IL-17 [69, 70]. In a macaque SIV infection model up to 85% of early virus-infected cells in the genital tract are CCR6+ [71], and in humans cervical IL-17+ cells are dramatically depleted very early in the course of human HIV infection [72], with preferential HIV infection of genital CCR6+ cells in vitro [73].

T cell integrins, the common mucosal immune system, and HIV susceptibility

Another correlate of cellular HIV susceptibility is the expression of integrin heterodimers, particularly the mucosal homing integrin α4β7, which both homes cells to mucosal sites through binding to MAdCAM [74] and can also facilitate binding of HIV to target cells [75]. Integrins are transmembrane glycoproteins that enable cell adhesion to the extracellular matrix and direct cell trafficking and retention in various anatomical sites [76]. Together with their ligands, integrins play a key role in the “common mucosal immune system” [77–79], which facilitates linkage and cross-talk between the immune cells of the gastrointestinal, respiratory and urogenital mucosae. As a result, an immune response generated at one mucosal site may in some cases induce a response in an anatomically distinct mucosal site via tissue homing through common mucosal pathways. For instance, oral immunization can generate an antibody response in the small intestine [77], and nasal immunization can induce host immune responses in the respiratory and reproductive tracts [77, 80–82]. Furthermore, systemic vaccination can induce high levels of mucosal homing T cells in the blood, with subsequent protection seen against genital virus challenge [83]. The three integrins α4β7 (CD49d/β7), α4β1 (CD49d/CD29) and αEβ7 (CD103/β7) appear to be especially important for mucosal T cell localization [84], which has implications for HIV pathogenesis, and since these parameters are also influenced by parasitic infections [85, 86], this could have important implications for the effect of endemic infections on HIV transmission.

Antiviral defense mechanisms, mucosal microbiota and HIV susceptibility

Intact mucosal surfaces present multiple lines of defense against viral invasion, such as an intact cervicovaginal epithelium, low pH mucus containing immunoglobulins, antimicrobial peptides and tissue resident immune cells that drive innate and adaptive antiviral responses [87]. The cervicovaginal mucus, for example, presents a physical obstruction for pathogens like HIV, as it can trap the virus at acidic pH [88]. Acidification of the cervicovaginal milieu is caused by lactic acid production by commensal lactobacilli and is thought to play an important role in HIV susceptibility [88].

Genital microbiota influence both genital immunology and HIV susceptibility. Bacterial vaginosis (BV), for example, is a commonly encountered alteration of the vaginal microbiome causing vaginal discharge. BV is associated with an augmented risk of acquiring sexually transmitted infections (STIs) including HIV [4, 89]. In line with this, research from South and East Africa shows that the genital abundance of dysbiosis-associated bacteria is associated with elevated odds of HIV acquisition [90, 91], while HIV-uninfected women with lactobacillus-predominant microflora are less likely to acquire HIV [91, 92] and have an improved efficacy of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis [93].

Systemically and in mucosae multiple innate antiviral defense mechanisms are effectively regulated by the interferon (IFN) system [94, 95]. Resistance to type I IFNs is recognized as a key characteristic of some early-transmitted HIV strains [96], while both IFN-II and III are recognized for their direct antiviral activity and ability to modulate antiviral immune responses [97–99]. Since parasitic infections can alter both mucosal microbial environment [100–105] and innate antiviral signalling [106–108], this could have implications for anti-HIV defense mechanisms.

Inflammation and HIV susceptibility

Inflammation is a complex immunological response to tissue damage and/or pathogen invasion, which ultimately aims to restore tissue integrity and eliminate the infection. A typical proinflammatory response involves cytokine production by epithelial, innate and adaptive immune cells, which leads to extravasation and further activation of immune cells at the tissue site. While an effective antiviral response involves immune activation, as seen for example during the induction of IFN-I signalling- where despite an increase in the number of target cells HIV infection is reduced [39, 109], chronic inflammation is thought to enhance HIV acquisition risk through various mechanisms. In the genital mucosa, persistent inflammation may disrupt cellular junctions and thus increase epithelial barrier permeability, which could facilitate HIV access to mucosal target cells [110]. At the same time, persistently elevated numbers of activated CD4 T cells at HIV exposure sites, as seen, for example, in sexually transmitted infections, would supply more cell targets for the virus [59]. Importantly, chronic inflammation also suppresses antiviral defenses and dysregulates interferon signaling [94]. In keeping with the detrimental effects of chronic inflammation on HIV immunity, pre-existing genital [111, 112] and systemic [113, 114] immune activation has been associated with subsequent HIV acquisition. On the other hand, HIV-exposed seronegative individuals (HESN), who may be less susceptible to HIV acquisition after sexual exposure, appear to have lowered systemic and mucosal immune activation compared to HIV-uninfected controls [52, 115–118]. Although some other studies have found that HESN have elevated levels of circulating HLA-DR+ T cells and CCR5+ CD4+ T cells [119] and increased CCR5 expression in cervical biopsies [120], as well as a high prevalence of genital co-infections acquired due to shared sexual risk factors.

Soluble immune mediators as biomarkers of HIV susceptibility

The impact of a pathogen on the genital or blood levels of soluble immune mediators can shed light on the likely influence of this pathogen on HIV susceptibility in human cohorts. However, it is important to remember that co-infections and behavioural factors may have differential effects on the immune parameters in the systemic and mucosal compartments [112, 121–123], and it is the immune milieu at the site of HIV exposure that is most relevant to HIV susceptibility [124].

The detection and/or level of several systemic and mucosal cytokines have been associated with HIV susceptibility in both human and macaque studies [112–114, 125, 126]. For example, HIV acquisition in South African women was associated with increased levels of vaginal genital macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1α, MIP-1β and IFN-γ-induced protein (IP)-10 [112], as well as increased mucosa-to-blood ratios of IP-10, MIP-1β, IL-8, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1 [125]. Another study found that blood levels of TNF, IL-2, IL-7 and IL-12 were increased in women who subsequently acquired HIV, compared with their female peers who remained HIV-uninfected [113]. Interestingly, a study of HIV-discordant couples from six different African countries reported an association of elevated circulating IL-10 and IP-10 with HIV seroconversion [114], although in South African women systemic IP-10 was inversely associated with HIV risk [125]. The reasons for these discrepancies are unclear, but this emphasizes the importance of studying immune factors at the actual mucosal site of HIV exposure rather than in blood, where associations may be confounded by genetic or environmental factors. Lastly, in a model of rectal simian HIV infection, systemic IL-8, RANTES (regulated on activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted) and eotaxin concentrations were associated with resistance to viral infection, while detectable blood IL-6 was associated with elevated susceptibility [126].

Despite some study-to-study variability, overall these data suggest that increased levels of mucosal proinflammatory cytokines are associated with elevated HIV susceptibility, in keeping with the association of these cytokines with mucosal epithelial barrier perturbations and influx of HIV target cells [110]. On the other hand, the relationship of systemic immune mediators with HIV susceptibility is distinct and less consistent than that of mucosal cytokines.

The relationship between endemic infections and HIV susceptibility

In this part of the review we will discuss the epidemiological and experimental data available on the relationship between endemic infections and HIV susceptibility using two fundamentally different but frequently ecologically overlapping examples of endemic infections: i) a protozoan infection (malaria) and ii) infections by multicellular parasites (helminths).

Malaria and HIV susceptibility

Malaria is caused by protozoan parasites of genus Plasmodium transmitted via a bite of Anopheles mosquito. Most malaria-associated morbidity in SSA is due to Plasmodium falciparum, the most prevalent malarial parasite in the region [127]. Plasmodium infects red blood cells and causes a febrile response in the infected individual. Without timely treatment, the disease can result in severe manifestations and even death. Residents of regions with stable malaria transmission rates over time become partially immune, are able to maintain low levels of infection and exhibit “asymptomatic” or “sub-clinical” malaria [128]. According to the WHO, in 2016 more than 190 million cases of malaria caused over 400,000 deaths in Africa [129]. Since the infection is more likely to cause severe manifestations in children than in adults, true malaria cases in adults are under-reported resulting in inaccurate estimations of disease burden [127]. Moreover, due to the difficulties encountered with maintaining high standards of diagnostic testing, malaria is frequently misdiagnosed resulting in high rates of false positivity in the absence of true infection, which can present barriers for clinical trials [130–132].

Impact of malaria on HIV susceptibility: epidemiological evidence

With the exception of South Africa where malaria transmission is infrequent, there is considerable ecological overlap between malaria and HIV transmission in SSA [133]. A cross-sectional study of 907 Tanzanian adults with and without HIV or malaria, found a significant association between malaria and HIV infection in a region with HIV and P. falciparum prevalence of 7.9% and 12.3%, respectively [134], providing evidence for an interaction between malaria and HIV transmission in a population with mixed HIV status. Аnother study based on the HIV and P. falciparum distribution in East Africa found that the residents of regions with high P. falciparum rates (Pf parasite rate (PfPR) >0.42) have a 2.44 fold risk of being HIV-infected compared to individuals living in low P. falciparum transmission settings (PfPR<0.01) after adjusting for social and biological risk factors associated with both infections [135]. Notably, this effect of malaria was not gender-specific (adjusted p<0.001 in both men and women), suggesting a biological mechanism that is dominated by systemic effects of malaria on HIV susceptibility. Further, the effect seen in the study was similar in magnitude to the association seen for genital ulcers in the same study [135]. Interestingly, the same group reported a lack of association between malaria and HIV in West African countries, attributing this discrepancy to region-specific HIV dynamics and the lower HIV prevalence in West Africa (≤5.0 %) compared to East Africa (≤10%) [136] and due to differences in the replicative capacity and infectiousness of the HIV subtypes dominant in these regions [137], while additional important factors could be the difference in circumcision rates between East and West Africa as well as other behavioural and environmental differences between the regions.

The mechanism for malaria-HIV interaction has been assumed to be the effect of malaria on HIV viral load and infectiousness in a co-infected person. A study from Malawi demonstrated that in co-infected individuals febrile malaria caused a ten-fold increase in HIV load [138], which translates into a roughly 2.5-fold increase in HIV transmission probability [10]. Applying these data and mathematical modelling to the western Kenyan community of Kisumu, Abu-Raddad and colleagues estimated that over 8500 HIV infections occurred in a Kenyan community of ~200,000 people because of malaria-HIV viral load interaction over a period of a decade [139], making the population attributable fraction of HIV cases attributable to malaria roughly 20%.

Impact of malaria on HIV susceptibility: potential immunological mechanisms

How malaria, a predominantly systemic condition, could influence mucosal HIV transmission is not completely clear, although several lines of evidence suggest that elevated immune activation is a major underlying cause. Thus, plasmodial antigens [140] and parasitized red blood cells [141] induce production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF), in blood mononuclear cells leading to increased T cell activation and elevated HIV replication in vitro [140]. In HIV-infected individuals malaria-induced immune activation drives elevation of blood viral load [138, 142], substantially enhancing viral transmission to HIV-uninfected partners [139].

While the effects of malaria on HIV susceptibility have not been assessed in HIV-negative people, there is compelling evidence from a murine model that malaria-associated systemic immune activation also translates into inflammation at mucosal interfaces. In particular, a study by Chege et al. found that malaria-infected mice had a more than four-fold increase in the number of activated/CCR5+ CD4 T cells in the genital tract, as well as substantial increases in the blood and gut mucosa [86]. Moreover, infected animals exhibited increased frequencies of circulating α4β7+ CD4 T cells, suggesting that malaria-induced systemic inflammation was enhancing the mucosal homing of activated immune cells [86].

There is also evidence for malaria’s direct pathogenic effects in mucosa. For example, P. falciparum-infected individuals show signs of gut epithelial barrier damage leading to increased gastrointestinal permeability [143] and elevated blood levels of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) [144]. These effects appear to be mediated through cytoadherence of infected red blood cells in the gut microvasculature [145], followed by mast cell invasion of intestinal villi and subsequent histamine release affecting intercellular tight junctions [146, 147]. The evidence of intestinal immune perturbations suggests that malaria may result in the induction of shared mucosal pathways, triggering activated immune cells trafficking to other mucosal sites, such as the genital tract. Cumulatively, the data from mouse models and human populations point to a plausible mechanism for malaria-induced elevated HIV susceptibility, which could underpin the malaria-associated HIV infections seen in East African populations.

Helminth infections and HIV susceptibility

Helminths are multicellular organisms that inhabit different anatomical sites in the human host, have complex life cycles. Human infection with worms typically occurs upon contact with contaminated food, water or soil. If left untreated, many helminths cause chronic infection that lasts for many years and results in delayed-onset pathology [148]. Most human morbidity in SSA is associated with three major helminth groups: soil transmitted helminths (STH), schistosomes and filarial nematodes (Fig. 1) [148], all of which are also classified as neglected tropical diseases [148].

Figure 1.

The most common groups of helminths globally. Numbers (in millions, M) refer to the approximate global burden of disease caused by each helminth group. Based on material from http://www.thiswormyworld.org/ and images adapted from Wikimedia. A. lumbricoides: Ascaris lumbricoides, T. trichiura: Trichuris trichiura, N. americanus: Necator americanus, S. mansoni: Schistosoma mansoni, S. haematobium: Schistosoma haematobium, S. japonicum: Schistosoma japonicum, L. loa: Loa loa, O. volvulus: Onchocerca volvulus, W. bancrofti: Wuchereria bancrofti, B. malayi: Brugia malayi

In the early 1990s it was proposed that helminthiases could contribute to elevated immune activation and increased HIV susceptibility in African communities [149, 150]. Subsequently, a study compared circulating T cell profiles of Ethiopian immigrants in Israel and found that the recent immigrants, who were heavily infected with helminths, exhibited elevated levels of activated CD4 and CD8 T cells compared to the immigrants who had lived in Israel for several years and were presumably free of helminths [151, 152]. Notably, in these studies the bulk of the recent immigrants were positive for Schistosoma mansoni (40.8-51%), followed by soil-transmitted hookworm Necator americanus (27.9-49%) and roundworm Ascaris lumbricoides (19.3-35.3%) [151, 152].

In support of these early studies, more recent research identified significant associations between blood T cell activation and soil transmitted helminths Trichuris and Ascaris [153] as well as evidence for elevated immune activation due to Wuchereria bancrofti infection [154]. Microbial translocation in the gut appears responsible for the immune activation linked to intestinal helminth infections [155–158]. Interestingly, helminthiasis treatment was associated with reversal of some immunologic parameters such as circulating dendritic cells in participants who cleared hookworm infection [156], but only moderate changes were observed in participants treated for other helminths [153]. Although the area of helminth-HIV interaction remains controversial, the most compelling evidence for the association of helminths and HIV infection comes from several studies of lymphatic filariasis and schistosomiasis (see below).

Immune response to helminths

Helminth infections are associated with both proinflammatory mucosal immune activation in response to the localized tissue damage due to parasite invasion and strong systemic immune suppression in part mediated by the worms’ own signaling molecules that mimic those found in the host's immunoregulatory apparatus [159].

The two discrete components of the systemic immune system induced by helminths are Th2 and immune regulatory responses, which evolve over time and dominate other effector responses. A Th2 response is marked by elevations in IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, while the hallmark cytokines of the regulatory response are IL-10 and TGFβ [160]. The helminth-induced systemic type 2 and regulatory responses are thought to help helminths escape the host’s proinflammatory responses and reduce tissue damage in chronic infection. For example, the severity of S. mansoni-induced granulomatous inflammation is correlated with levels of TNF, soluble TNF receptors and IFNγ, the effects of which are counterbalanced by IL-10 and type 2 cytokines and can lead to severe organ damage in individuals with low Th2 and regulatory responses [161, 162]. The multidimensionality of anti-helminth immune responses is thought to impact immunity to bystander pathogens, such as HIV, and vaccine responses in helminth-infected individuals [163].

Interestingly, the helminth-induced Th2-Treg bias is reminiscent of that observed in chronic HIV infection, where it is thought to favour chronic viral replication [164]; a similar profile is also seen in the genital mucosa of HIV+ women, who exhibit elevated levels of genital IL-4, IL-5 and IL-10 but low levels of IL-2 compared to HIV-uninfected women [165]. Therefore, among the earliest proposed mechanisms to explain helminth effects on HIV infection was helminth-driven shift of Th cell populations to be more Th2-like. It was initially postulated that the Th2 shift on the one hand yields highly HIV-susceptible Th2 cells, and on the other hand suppresses the antiviral Th1 immunity [166]. With advances in cell phenotyping it became clear that Th2 cells are mainly susceptible to CXCR4-tropic HIV [67], rather than the CCR5-tropic strains that are largely responsible for sexual transmission, suggesting that a host Th2 immune bias is unlikely to play a major role in enhanced genital HIV susceptibility; however, helminths induce robust tissue Th17 responses (as described below) [167, 168], providing a more plausible mechanism for helminth-enhanced HIV susceptibility.

Helminth effects on the host antiviral defense mechanisms and microbiota

Several lines of evidence indicate that parasitic worms may exert profound effects on systemic and mucosal antiviral defenses. Depending on the stage of helminth infection, these effects can promote or suppress the host’s antiviral defense mechanisms. For example, studies in murine models of acute S. mansoni and hookworm Heligmosmoides polygyrus infection have reported protective effects of these intestinal helminths on antiviral immunity in the lungs [169]. In the case of S. mansoni infection this effect was seen in the context of Katayama fever, the highly proinflammatory Th1/Th17 environment that is induced at 10-12 weeks post-helminth infection, and reduced infection by pneumonia and influenza viruses via TNF-mediated mechanisms [170]. In the instance of hookworm infection, the antiviral effects were seen in animals challenged with respiratory syncitial virus 10 days after the helminth infection and were mediated through IFN-I production in both the gut and lung mucosae [169].

In contrast to acute helminth infections, chronic helminthiases appear to dampen host antiviral responses, both via host Treg-Th2 signaling and through the immune-modulatory molecules secreted by the parasites [171]. In line with this, a study of CD4 T cell transcriptomic responses in a murine model of S. japonicum infection demonstrated that a significant proportion of schistosome-downregulated host genes belonged to the interferon-inducible gene cluster [172]. The helminth-triggered interferon pathway down-regulation appears to be mediated by the Th2 cytokine IL-4 [173]. In keeping with the latter, infection with intestinal helminth Trichinella spiralis diminished immunity to norovirus through IL-4 signaling and STAT6-dependent alternative activation of macrophages with subsequent inhibition of antiviral Th1 function [174].

The role of the microbiome in helminth infection-mediated elevated HIV susceptibility deserves attention in the light of several recently published studies. For example, a study of S. haematobium-infected children reported an association of genitourinary schistosomiasis with the gram-negative Prevotella genus in the gut, an observation that persisted three months after anthelminthic therapy [100]. Since Prevotella has been associated with mucosal inflammation along with Th17 polarisation in the gut and genital tract [175], this association could suggest a mechanism for enhanced HIV susceptibility at the mucosal interface. Interestingly, another study performed in India found a negative association between STH infections and intestinal Lactobacillus species [103]- also suggesting a shift toward a more proinflammatory microbial environment in the presence of STH, which could enhance HIV susceptibility.

Lymphatic filariasis and HIV susceptibility

Lymphatic filariasis (LF), or elephantiasis, affects 37 African countries and is caused by the nematode W. bancrofti [176], a parasite that is transmitted by several different mosquito species. The W. bancrofti adult stage (a worm) resides in the lymphatic system of various organs, including the genital tract, while the larval stage (microfilariae) circulates in the blood [176]. Most LF-infected individuals remain asymptomatic, with a minority developing severe pathology, the hallmark of which is profound lymphoedema of affected organs [148, 176].

The first experimental evidence of LF-associated effects on HIV transmission was an in vitro study demonstrating that peripheral blood mononuclear cells from W. bancrofti-infected individuals sustained higher levels of HIV replication than cells from LF-free persons [177]. Subsequent cross-sectional studies in SSA reported conflicting associations between W. bancrofti and HIV prevalence [134, 178, 179]. However, a recent prospective study of >1000 initially HIV-uninfected Tanzanian adults of known LF infection status [180] demonstrated that LF-infected individuals were twice as likely to become HIV infected as their LF-uninfected peers after controlling for several sociobehavioural HIV risk factors [180]. Moreover, W. bancrofti infection has now been linked to elevated frequencies of circulating HLA-DR+ and HLA-DR+CD38+ as well as effector memory CD4 T cells, suggesting that the helminth-induced systemic CD4 T cell activation could be at least in part responsible for enhanced HIV susceptibility associated with this helminth [154].

Schistosomiasis and HIV susceptibility

Schistosomiasis, also known as bilharzia or snail fever, is a neglected tropical disease transmitted via contact with contaminated freshwater and caused by flat worms of the genus Schistosoma. Schistosomiasis is highly prevalent across SSA [181] and in recent years schistosomiasis infection rates have increased due to dramatic environmental changes affecting water systems [182]. The mature schistosomes dwell in the blood vessels surrounding internal organs. The worms form couples consisting of a male and a female schistosome, in a permanent state of copulation and egg production [183]. Each egg secretes proteolytic enzymes that facilitate its migration into the internal organ lumen for subsequent excretion in either urine or feces (reviewed in [184, 185]).

A few weeks to months after primary infection with schistosomes, some individuals develop a systemic hypersensitivity reaction, known as Katayama fever, typically lasting 2-10 weeks [183]. The manifestations of this acute inflammatory response during the schistosomula migration include flu-like symptoms and hypereosinophilia, followed by abdominal symptoms caused by the settling of the mature worms [183]. Katayama fever is typically seen after primary infection in previously unexposed travelers to disease endemic regions, while in chronically exposed populations this acute response is not observed due to pre-existing tolerance induced during in utero exposure to helminth antigens [183]. After infection has been established, the tissue-trapped eggs are responsible for most of the damage to the host tissues. In particular, the eggs induce formation of pro-inflammatory granulomas, which become smaller as the infection enters a chronic phase [186]. These granulomas contain a variety of immune cells, including macrophages, dendritic cells, eosinophils, neutrophils, T and B cells, and their composition changes depending on disease severity [187].

The two forms of schistosomiasis in SSA

The two main species responsible for schistosomiasis in SSA are: (i) S. haematobium, which is transmitted by Bulinus snails, and which resides within the perivesical veins where it causes genitourinary schistosomiasis; and (ii) S. mansoni, which is transmitted by Biomphalaria snails, and which dwells predominantly in the mesenteric veins where it causes intestinal and hepatic schistosomiasis [183] (Fig. 1). Fresh water bodies such as the River Nile and Lake Victoria in East Africa are typical sources of schistosomes, and schistosomiasis prevalence tends to be inversely proportional to the distance that a person lives from these water bodies [188]. The infection prevalence and intensity increase gradually with age, peaking around age 10-20 years and decreasing later in life, while high schistosomiasis burdens are typically seen only in a small proportion of infected individuals [183, 189]. The latter characteristics of schistosomiasis epidemiology appear to be guided by the exposed individuals’ water-contact patterns and anti-schistosomal immunity.

S. haematobium and HIV susceptibility

S. haematobium, the cause of genitourinary schistosomiasis, is a WHO-recognized risk factor for HIV infection in women [190]. The prevalence of S. haematobium and HIV strongly correlate across SSA, after adjusting for multiple known HIV risk factors [191], while mathematical modelling indicates that exposure to the parasite elevates the odds of female HIV-positivity in Mozambique [192]. Notably, until recently S. haematobium was considered rare in South Africa, the country with the largest HIV epidemic in the world, but several recent surveys found substantial S. haematobium presence within multiple South African provinces, with an infection prevalence as high as 70% [193–196].

Cross-sectional epidemiological studies from Zimbabwe, Malawi and Tanzania reported that S. haematobium-infected women were are up to four-fold more likely to be HIV-infected compared to their peers without genitourinary schistosomiasis [189, 197, 198]. However, although a recent prospective study found S. haematobium infection to be associated with incident HIV transmission among Zambian couples [199], another recent study from East Africa showed no link between S. haematobium and HIV acquisition (unpublished data presented by Dr. Aaron Bochner and Dr. Ruanne Barnabas, University of Washington, [200]).

At the organ level, S. haematobium eggs can cause substantial damage to the pelvic tissues, involving the bladder, ureters, cervix and vagina. This leads to mucosal edema, open bleeding and an altered genital epithelium [201, 202], and directly increases HIV susceptibility through loss of epithelial integrity, increased vascularity and enhanced inflammation [189, 203]. Indeed, the host immune response to S. haematobium ova has been shown to recruit HIV target cells to the genital mucosa, including CD4+ T cells and macrophages [204].

Interestingly, recent reports describe distinct transcriptional profiles linked with S. haematobium infection in cross-sectional studies of whole blood- and cervical cytobrush-derived transcriptomes of individuals with and without schistosomiasis [205, 206]. While S. haematobium+ women also had reduced cervicovaginal IL-15 levels in these studies, the impact of this finding on HIV susceptibility is unclear, since IL-15 both stimulates anti-HIV immunity by enhancing the functionality of NK and CD8 T cells [207, 208] but also augments early HIV entry into CD4 T cells [209]. Nonetheless, these findings demonstrate that S. haematobium has substantial impact on both systemic and mucosal immunity.

Far less studied than in women, S. haematobium also causes male genital schistosomiasis (MGS), which may manifest as haematospermia and increased levels of seminal leukocytes in men [210]. However, it is thought that S. haematobium plays a lesser role in enhanced HIV susceptibility in men compared to women, because S. haematobium-affected male genital tissues are relatively proximal and so do not come into direct contact with HIV during condomless insertive penile sex [189]. Recent systematic reviews stress the urgent need for high quality clinical, randomized and epidemiological studies on MGS and HIV [189, 211].

S. mansoni and HIV susceptibility

In most individuals S. mansoni infection is asymptomatic and does not lead to severe pathological sequelae. Like other schistosome species, S. mansoni are long-lived (up to 30 years) and are generally not cleared by the host immune system in the absence of anthelminthic therapy [212]. Post-mortem studies of S. mansoni infected individuals report the presence of extensive granulomatous inflammation, pseudopolyposis, ulcerations and bleeding in the colon and rectum [213, 214]. In some individuals the eggs trapped in the liver can cause hepatic schistosomiasis, the cause of abdominal organomegaly mainly in children and adolescents. Later in life, egg deposition in the periportal space can result in chronic hepatic schistosomiasis that causes portal hypertension and organomegaly [183].

The epidemiology of S. mansoni-HIV interaction

The overlap of S. mansoni infection with HIV prevalence in regions with very low S. haematobium infection has generated the hypothesis that S. mansoni might also increase HIV susceptibility. However, epidemiological studies performed so far have produced evidence both for and against this hypothesis. Studies performed in Tanzania reported that S. mansoni-infected women were six-fold more likely to be HIV-infected compared to their female peers without schistosomiasis [188], and subsequently a prospective study from the same group found that S. mansoni-infected women had a 2.8-fold increased risk of HIV acquisition [215]. Notably, these effects of S. mansoni on HIV acquisition in the Tanzanian studies were only seen in women, but not men [215, 216]. Furthermore, a study from Uganda reported that people with detectable antibodies against S. mansoni soluble egg antigens (SmSEA) were more likely to be HIV-positive compared to SmSEA-negative individuals [217], while a prospective study from Zambia found a trend to elevated HIV risk in women positive for S.mansoni-specific antibodies [199].

On the other hand, research in a separate cohort residing on the Ugandan shores of Lake Victoria did not find an association between prevalent or incident HIV and S. mansoni infection [218, 219]. However, this study recruited fewer females (88/200), and only 18 women (versus 84 men) were infected by S. mansoni [219]. Therefore, if S. mansoni only increases HIV susceptibility in women, the Ugandan studies may have been underpowered to detect an HIV association, and interestingly these studies did observe an association between S. mansoni treatment and decreased HIV prevalence [218, 219]. In addition, emerging data from a nested case-control study in Kenya and Uganda also show no association between S. mansoni infection and HIV risk (unpublished data presented by Dr. Aaron Bochner and Dr. Ruanne Barnabas, University of Washington [200]).

The reasons for these discrepant findings are not clear. In the earliest studies, region-specific HIV transmission dynamics could have played a role in the different outcomes seen by Tanzanian and Ugandan researchers, since the HIV prevalence in Uganda (17.3%) was about 3-fold higher than Tanzania (5.6-6.1%). Furthermore, neither the early Uganda or Tanzania-based studies assessed injectable contraceptive use, which varies substantially across East African countries [220, 221], is linked with both altered genital immunology [222] and HIV acquisition [3], and which was inversely correlated with S. mansoni infection in Ugandan women [223]. However, more recent studies that do control for these parameters still generate conflicting results, making it important to consider biological mechanisms by which S. mansoni infection might enhance HIV susceptibility in the FGT.

The biology of S. mansoni-HIV interaction

It is not well understood how S. mansoni infection could increase HIV susceptibility, and why this effect appears only in women. Acute S. mansoni infection in rhesus macaques increases their susceptibility to a rectal SHIV challenge, with mucosal infection requiring 17-fold less virus compared to schistosoma-free animals, but vaginal challenge was not performed in these studies [224, 225]. Furthermore, individuals with intestinal schistosomiasis exhibited elevated levels of TLR2 and 4 expressing B cells [155] and high levels of blood LPS [155, 157], indicating helminth-induced bacterial translocation due to decreased integrity of the gut mucosal barrier.

While it is logical that intestinal schistosomiasis would have a direct effect on HIV transmission after sexual exposure in the rectal mucosa, helminth-induced gut mucosal inflammation could theoretically involve other mucosal sites (such as the female lower genital tract) through activation of the common mucosal immune system [79]. In keeping with this, S. mansoni-infected women with a higher parasite burden demonstrated elevated expression of the mucosal homing integrin α4β7 on blood CD4+ T cells [226], which would be expected to home these CD4 cells to the gut and cervical mucosa. However, this integrin does not appear to home T cells to the foreskin, the predominant site of HIV acquisition in heterosexual men from SSA, since the predominant integrin expressed on T cells in foreskin tissues is cutaneous lymphocyte antigen (CLA) [48]. The latter could at least partly explain the differential impact of S. mansoni infection on HIV susceptibility in women versus men.

Curiously, a recent study found cervical gene expression to be unaltered by S. mansoni infection [206], however transcriptional analysis in this study was done using unfractionated cervical samples, which would detect changes in the most common mucosal cells (especially epithelial cells) but might not detect changes occurring at the level of less frequent mucosal cell subsets, such as CD4+ T cells.

HIV target cells in S. mansoni infection

At the cellular level, schistosomiasis has been associated with increased expression of CD4+ T cell parameters that enhance HIV susceptibility, including increased CCR5+ expression and a Th17 phenotype. Secor and colleagues reported elevated expression of CCR5 and CXCR4 on circulating CD4 T cells of S. mansoni-infected Kenyan men, and their expression dropped after schistosomiasis treatment [227]. Furthermore, studies in murine models indicate that the parasite-driven granuloma formation is mediated by Th17 cells. Specifically, schistosomiasis immunopathology in internal organs is strongly associated with Th17-inducing cytokines such as IL-23, and Th17-produced cytokines such as IL-17 and IL-22 [167]. Th17 cells appear to control granulomatous inflammation by regulating neutrophil infiltration [167]. Interestingly, the profiles of circulating Th17 cells have been shown to correlate well with those seen in tissues of S. mansoni-infected mice [168] and Th17 cells were present at higher frequencies in the blood of S. mansoni-infected Ugandans [228]. Given that Th17 cells are a primary target of HIV [71], the elevated levels of these cells may be important contributors to enhanced HIV acquisition in S. mansoni-infected individuals.

Evidence for direct urogenital effects of “intestinal” S. mansoni infection

The recent findings of elevated HIV acquisition in women with S. mansoni infection in some studies raise the possibility that this helminth infection may have direct urogenital effects [215]. Although classically considered a mesenteric infection, early autopsy studies in S. mansoni-infected individuals found that 24% of all eggs were lodged in the urogenital tract [213]. Further, studies in Tanzanian women found S. mansoni eggs in cervical biopsies to be associated with cervical lesions [201]. Based on several other reports [229, 230], Feldmeier and colleagues postulated that due to both host and parasite-dependent factors, up to 27% of women with intestinal schistosomiasis show pathological signs due to S. mansoni eggs trapped in their urogenital tract [231]. Therefore, Downs and colleagues proposed that the effects of S. mansoni on HIV susceptibility could be attributed to the direct effects of helminth eggs on the urogenital mucosa [215].

This mechanism could thus explain the sex-biased effects of S. mansoni, due to the differences in the anatomical structure of the genital tract in men versus women. Specifically, the genitourinary organs most affected by the eggs of S. haematobium and S. mansoni in men are the prostate and seminal vesicles [213, 232, 233], but not the penis, the primary site of HIV acquisition in heterosexual men [53]. In keeping with this, schistosome-infected women also shed fewer parasite eggs than schistosome+ men for a given worm burden [234], suggesting that schistosome eggs in women are more frequently trapped inside the body compared to men. This finding also has implications for the overall levels of inflammation and HIV susceptibility: at a similar worm burden, more trapped eggs would translate into elevated mucosal inflammation and HIV susceptibility in schistosome+ women compared to men.

Could the treatment of endemic infections reduce HIV susceptibility?

If endemic infections do elevate HIV susceptibility, then their treatment and/or prophylaxis could be an effective addition to the HIV prevention toolbox. While a meta-analysis of studies in HIV-infected individuals indicated substantial changes in HIV blood viral load after the treatment of co-infections [8]. However, data about any effects of endemic infection treatment on HIV susceptibility are lacking, due to the paucity of prospective studies [189].

Deworming could theoretically reduce HIV susceptibility by lowering helminth-induced inflammation in tissues, lifting systemic immune suppression and down-regulating HIV co-receptor expression. For instance, schistosomiasis therapy reduces circulating Tregs and innate immune cells involved in granulomatous inflammation [235, 236], thus lifting suppression of antiviral immunity and reducing HIV infection-enhancing inflammation (although removal of Tregs might also favour HIV susceptibility by increasing the number of activated cells [118, 237]. Furthermore, S. mansoni treatment in Kenyan men decreased HIV co-receptor CCR5/CXCR4 density on circulating CD4 T cells [227] and a reduction of CCR5 expression was reported after treatment of Trichuris in Tanzania [153]. Similar observations were made in South African women treated for S. haematobium, whereby CCR5 expression by CD4+ T cells decreased significantly in blood and reductions were seen for monocyte CCR5 expression in both blood and the cervix 7-8 months after treatment [203].

Based on the epidemiological evidence of S. haematobium-amplified HIV transmission, mathematical modeling forecasts that treatment of genitourinary S. haematobium infections in school-age children could be a highly cost-effective intervention for preventing HIV infection in schistosome-endemic areas [238, 239]. According to these models, over a decade of annual praziquantel administration, an amount of $52-260 would be spent per every HIV case averted- a more cost-effective HIV prevention strategy compared to STI treatment or male circumcision. Given that S. mansoni infection has been associated with an HIV risk similar to that seen for S. haematobium [189] and that in S. mansoni-endemic Uganda a history of schistosomiasis treatment was linked to lower HIV risk [218, 219], it is plausible that “intestinal” S. mansoni infection treatment would also be a cost-effective strategy for HIV prevention.

In keeping with the earlier studies, our recent work [226] provides support for future clinical studies of S. mansoni treatment as an HIV prevention strategy. Specifically, we found that S. mansoni treatment resulted in an over two- fold reduction of ex vivo HIV entry into genital and blood CD4 T cells, but surprisingly this reduced virus entry after praziquantel therapy was accompanied by transient immune activation in the cervix and blood. Traditionally, immune activation is thought to elevate HIV susceptibility [59], and to increase HIV entry into CD4 T cells [240]. However, in some contexts immune activation can accompany a strong antiviral immune response incapacitating multiple HIV infection stages, from cellular entry to production of virus progeny [241–243]. Based on these studies, we hypothesized that S. mansoni treatment resulted in the induction of antiviral signaling. Subsequent experiments provided evidence of elevated mucosal IFN-α2a and a systemic transcriptomic signature of interferon signaling induction after S. mansoni treatment. Remarkably, untreated S. mansoni infection was associated with antiviral gene down-regulation and praziquantel therapy partially reversed this helminth-induced immune suppression [226].

Lastly, the effects of chronic infections can be long-lasting even after successful clearance of parasites, as observed, for example, after S. haematobium treatment, whereby parasite DNA was still detectable in the genital tract along with anatomical abnormalities six months post-deworming [244]. This means that it will be important to choose an appropriate time-frame for future studies that aim to investigate the effects of deworming on HIV susceptibility.

Conclusion

HIV continues to exert a substantial toll on the lives of people in SSA, and recent evidence suggests that there is considerable interaction between parasitic infections and HIV transmission in this region. Previously, the impact of endemic infections on HIV transmission had been explored mainly in the context of co-infection in HIV+ individuals. In this review we summarized the evidence for and against the effects of parasitic infections on HIV susceptibility in HIV-uninfected individuals. The paucity of data in this field, and the contradictory nature of the results from the few studies that have been performed, emphasizes the need for well-designed clinical trials to investigate the effects of parasitic infections and their treatment on HIV incidence in endemic communities. Ultimately, effective control of parasitic infections might not only reduce widespread morbidity directly caused by these infections, but might also reduce HIV transmission among the millions of at-risk individuals exposed to the endemic infections in SSA.

Authors’ contributions

SY, RK: conceived the review, drafted the manuscript. VJ, RMG, SVG, BO: contributed to the contents of the review. All authors critically reviewed the draft of the paper and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

RK is supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), SY by CIHR Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarship and RMG by the Fogarty HIV Research Training Program of the National Institutes of Health (4D43TW009578-04).

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.