Skip to main content
PMC home page
Horticulture Research logoLink to Horticulture Research
. 2019 Dec 1;6:131. doi: 10.1038/s41438-019-0221-8

RhMYB108, an R2R3-MYB transcription factor, is involved in ethylene- and JA-induced petal senescence in rose plants

Shuai Zhang 1,2,#, Qingcui Zhao 1,2,#, Daxing Zeng 1,2, Jiehua Xu 1,2, Hougao Zhou 3, Fenglan Wang 3, Nan Ma 4, Yonghong Li 1,2,✉
PMCID: PMC6885062  PMID: 31814984

Abstract

Rose (Rosa hybrida) plants are major ornamental species worldwide, and their commercial value greatly depends on their open flowers, as both the quality of fully open petals and long vase life are important. Petal senescence can be started and accelerated by various hormone signals, and ethylene is considered an accelerator of petal senescence in rose. To date, however, the underlying mechanism of signaling crosstalk between ethylene and other hormones such as JA in petal senescence remains largely unknown. Here, we isolated RhMYB108, an R2R3-MYB transcription factor, which is highly expressed in senescing petals as well as in petals treated with exogenous ethylene and JA. Applications of exogenous ethylene and JA markedly accelerated petal senescence, while the process was delayed in response to applications of 1-MCP, an ethylene action inhibitor. In addition, silencing of RhMYB108 alter the expression of SAGs such as RhNAC029, RhNAC053, RhNAC092, RhSAG12, and RhSAG113, and finally block ethylene- and JA-induced petal senescence. Furthermore, RhMYB108 was identified to target the promoters of RhNAC053, RhNAC092, and RhSAG113. Our results reveal a model in which RhMYB108 functions as a receptor of ethylene and JA signals to modulate the onset of petal senescence by targeting and enhancing senescence-associated gene expression.

Subject terms: Plant signalling, Plant hormones

Introduction

Petals are a key component of flowers, and by attracting pollinators, they play a vital role in ensuring successful pollination1. Petal senescence is a natural and irreversible process that occurs at the terminal stage of flower development and is tightly controlled by environmental and developmental signals. Many physiological activities occur together with petal senescence, such as the breaking down of intracellular structures, the degrading of membrane systems and macromolecules, and the recycling of nutrients, all of which similarly occur together with leaf senescence2,3. Many excellent studies have reported that multiple vital activities are involved in petal senescence, such as programmed cell death (PCD)4–6, sugar metabolism7, hormone regulation8,9, and the regulatory activity of associated gene networks10–12.

The onset of petal senescence is initiated by external and internal cues, and phytohormones have been revealed to act as essential signals in initiating and modulating the senescence process. Among the hormones involved, ethylene and abscisic acid (ABA) function as inducers, and salicylic acid (SA), cytokinin (CTK), and gibberellic acid (GA) function as inhibitors13–16. The role of jasmonic acid (JA) and auxin in petal senescence is still unknown10.

Ethylene is considered a major endogenous signal of fruit ripening and leaf and petal senescence. Exogenous applications of ethylene can significantly accelerate petal senescence13 and floral organ abscission17. ETHYLENE INSENSITIVE 2 (EIN2), which functions as the core member of ethylene signaling, acts as a key component in ethylene signaling. In ein2-1 mutant plants, petal senescence and floral organ abscission are unaffected by exogenous ethylene applications. During petal senescence in rose, expression of the ethylene biosynthesis genes 1-AMINOCYCLOPROPANE-1-CARBOXYLIC ACID SYNTHASE 1 and 1-AMINOCYCLOPROPANE-1-CARBOXYLIC ACID SYNTHASE 2 (ACS1 and ACS2, respectively) strongly increases, coupled with an accelerated increase in ethylene content18. It has been widely reported that JA functions in leaf senescence19–22, but its function in petal senescence is largely unclear. Some research has confirmed that applications of methyl jasmonate (MeJA), either as an aqueous solution or as a gas, accelerate petal senescence in Petunia and Dendrobium23; additional evidence has shown that, by completely suppressing tepal wilting, MeJA delays senescence in cut Iris flowers24.

Recent research on the ethylene and JA signaling pathways has shed light on the functional relationship of these two hormones in floral organ abscission17 and leaf senescence25. Floral organ abscission is a typical characteristic that occurs in response to ethylene. In ein2-1 mutants, floral organ abscission was shown to be unaffected by applications of exogenous ethylene, whereas applications of JA could rescue the ethylene response of those mutants17. These results suggest that interplay between JA and ethylene occurs. In Arabidopsis leaf senescence, the function of JA in accelerated senescence depends on the ethylene signaling pathway, especially the key molecular components ETHYLENE INSENSITIVE 3 (EIN3) and ETHYLENE INSENSITIVE 3-LIKE 1 (EIL1). Studies have shown that the ein3 mutant displays delay JA-induced leaf senescence25. EIN3/EIL1 are the direct targets of JAZ repressors, which inhibit EIN3 and EIL1 transcriptional activities via physical interactions. Moreover, JASMONATE-ZIM DOMAIN (JAZ) proteins recruit HISTONE DEACETYLASE 6 (HDA6), a positive regulator of JA signaling, which subsequently inhibits EIN3/EIL1-dependent transcription and JA signaling because of acetylation modification26. However, understanding of the signaling crosstalk between ethylene and JA during petal senescence is unclear. In Dendrobium and Petunia, the effects of JA-induced tepal/petal senescence are accompanied by a massive production of ethylene, and the effects on senescence can be abolished by treatment with antagonists of ethylene synthesis or ethylene action23. This evidence reveals that the JA signal appears to be dragged in the ethylene pathway to modulate senescence.

Typical signs of petal senescence include color change, wilting, and petal abscission8,10,18. In this study, we identified a MYB transcription factor, RhMYB108, as being involved in the interplay between ethylene and JA signaling and thus regulating petal senescence in rose. According to their number of conserved MYB structural motifs, MYB proteins are classified into R1-MYB, R2R3-MYB, R3-MYB, and R4-MYB subfamilies27,28 and function in the regulation of plant growth, hormone signal transduction, stress and disease resistance, and secondary metabolism29–33. Here, we show that RhMYB108, which belongs to the R2R3-MYB family, is intensely expressed in rose petals. Silencing of RhMYB108 delayed petal senescence by directly regulating the expression of senescence-associated genes (SAGs), including RhNAC053, RhNAC092, and RhSAG113, by physically interacting with their promoter; thus, RhMYB108 functions in petal senescence. In brief, our findings highlight the importance of RhMYB108 in the onset of petal senescence and imply that its function may integrate ethylene and JA signaling crosstalk during petal senescence.

Materials and methods

Plant materials and treatments

R. hybrida cv. Samantha plantlets were propagated as previously described15,34. Rooted rose and tobacco (Nicotiana benthamiana) plants were transplanted into pots and then grown in a growth chamber whose conditions included a 22 ± 1 °C temperature, a 16 h/8 h photoperiod and ~60% relative humidity.

With respect to JA treatment, flower buds of rose plantlets or petal discs were sprayed with 100 μM MeJA, after which they were untouched for 24 h; the control samples were placed in 0.1% ethanol. With respect to ethylene or 1-MCP treatment, rose plantlets or petal discs were exposed to 10 μL/L gaseous ethylene or 2 µL/L 1-MCP, respectively, in an airtight growth container for 24 h, and NaOH solution (1 M) was also added to the container to prevent CO2 accumulation, as previously described15,18,35.

Measurement of ion leakage rates

Detached rose petals or petal discs were placed in 50 -mL tubes that contained 20 mL of deionized water. After the tubes were shaken at 28 °C for 30 min, the initial conductivity of the solution (C1) was measured using a conductivity meter (DDBJ-350, Precision & Scientific Instruments Co., Shanghai, China). The tubes were subsequently boiled in the same deionized water for 15 min, and the conductivity of the resulting solution (C2) was determined after the tubes cooled. The ion leakage rates were calculated by the C1:C2 ratios.

RNA extraction and quantitative real-time PCR

RNA was extracted from the roots, stems, leaves, petals, sepals, and receptacles of rose plants as previously described36. The total RNA of the stamens and pistils was isolated using an RNA extraction kit (RN38-EASY, Aidlab Biotech, Beijing, China). The RNA was then reverse-transcribed using QRT SuperMix for qPCR (R233-01, Vazyme Biotech Co., Nanjing, China) and oligo (dT) primers. In conjunction with 2 μL of cDNA used as a template, qRT-PCR was performed via a Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA) together with a Kapa SYBR Fast Universal qPCR Kit (Kapa Biosystems, Boston, MA, USA). RhUBI2 was used as an internal control.

Protein subcellular localization assays

With respect to subcellular localization assays, the open-reading frame (ORF) of RhMYB108 without the stop codon was amplified by PCR and then fused into the N-terminal region of a GFP label; the fusion protein was driven by the Super promoter. On the 3rd day after infiltration of Agrobacterium carrying the corresponding plasmid, the tobacco leaves were monitored by laser confocal fluorescence microscopy (Olympus Fluoview FV1000). pSuper::GFP served as a negative control, and pSuper::NF-YA4-mCherry was used as a nuclear marker.

Transactivation and dual-luciferase reporter assays

Transcriptional activity assays of RhMYB108 were performed in tobacco leaves. The ORF of RhMYB108 was amplified and inserted into a pBD vector, which served as an effector. A double-reporter vector, which contained a GAL4-LUC and an internal control REN gene driven by the 35S promoter, was also used.

To analyze the interaction between RhMYB108 and the SAG promoter in N. benthamiana, we constructed two vectors: pGreenII 0800-LUC and pGreenII 0029 62-SK37–39. The SAG promoters were amplified and inserted into the pGreenII 0800-LUC vector at the BamHI and NcoI sites to drive the expression of the LUC reporter gene, and the RhMYB108 ORF was inserted into the pGreenII 0029 62-SK vector at the BamHI and KpnI sites. The pGreenII 0800-LUC vector carries a renilla luciferase (REN) gene driven by the 35S promoter to serve as an internal control.

The effector construct and reporter plasmid were cotransformed into tobacco leaves by Agrobacterium infiltration as previously described40. At 48 h after transformation, the leaves were maintained in darkness for 5 min to measure LUC fluorescence.

Yeast one-hybrid assays

Y1H assays were performed as described in the Yeast Protocols Handbook (Clontech Laboratories, USA). Two vectors were constructed for use in this system: pLacZi and pJG4-5. SAG promoters were inserted into the pLacZi vector, and the RhMYB108 ORF sequence was inserted into the pJG4-5 vector. The plasmid construct was subsequently transformed into yeast strain EGY48, which was then grown on SD plates that lacked uracil and tryptophan, but contained X-β-gal for blue/white colony screening.

Virus-induced gene silencing

VIGS of RhMYB108 in rose petal discs and plantlets was performed as previously described15,41. A specific fragment of RhMYB108 (437 bp in length) was amplified and inserted into a pTRV2 vector by XbaI and KpnI. The vectors were transformed into A. tumefaciens strain GV3101, and the transformed A. tumefaciens cells were cultured in LB medium (supplemented with 50 μg/mL kanamycin and 50 μg/mL rifampicin) on a rocking platform (200 rpm) at 28 °C for 18 h. The cells were harvested and resuspended in infiltration buffer (10 mM MgCl2, 200 mM acetosyringone, 10 mM MES, pH 5.6) to a final OD600 of ~1.5. The culture mixtures contained pTRV1- and pTRV2-RhMYB108 at a ratio of 1:1 (v/v) or pTRV1 and pTRV2 (the negative control). The culture mixtures were incubated in the dark at room temperature for 3–4 h before infiltration.

With respect to VIGS in rose petal discs, the petals were collected at stage 2 of flower opening, and two 1 cm diameter discs were isolated from symmetrical locations of the petals using a hole punch. The plantlets were subsequently placed in deionized water for 1 day to equilibrate after multiplication by tissue culture as previously described15. The discs and plantlets were submerged in infiltration buffer and then exposed to a vacuum (−25 kPa) twice (each for 60 s). After the release of the vacuum, the discs and plantlets were briefly washed with deionized water and then incubated in the dark at 8 °C for 3 days. The phenotypes of the discs were observed daily until necrosis, and the flowers of the rose plantlets were monitored at various time points from stages 1 to 6.

Sequence analysis

With respect to multiple sequence alignment, the amino acid sequences were aligned using ClustalW with the default parameters (https://www.genome.jp/tools-bin/clustalw), and figures were created using the BioEdit software package (version 7.2.5)42. With respect to phylogenetic tree analysis, the alignment results were computed using MEGA software (version 5.05) based on the neighbor-joining algorithm and the following parameters: 1000 bootstrap replicates, Poisson correction, pairwise deletion, and uniform rates.

Statistical analyses

Statistical analysis of the data was performed via GraphPad Prism 8.0 (GraphPad Software Inc., USA; http://www.graphpad.com/). Two groups of data were compared using two-sided Student’s t tests (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001). The means of multiple groups of data were compared via one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni’s post hoc test, with P < 0.05 considered significant.

Results

Ethylene and JA accelerate the senescence of rose petals

The function of ethylene and JA in the acceleration of leaf senescence has been widely reported21,25, but the interaction and crosstalk between these hormones during flower senescence has not been studied in detail. To determine the effects of ethylene and JA during flower senescence, we introduced a rose petal disc system13,43. As shown in Fig. 1a, the control petal discs at 10 days after incubation displayed slight color fading. After ethylene or JA treatment, the color fading started at 5 days, and nearly all discs showed severe color loss after 10 days of incubation. The color fading rate and ion permeability were markedly higher in the treated petals than in the control petals (Fig. 1b, c). Furthermore, the transcript levels of SAG RhSAG12, a molecular marker of rose petal senescence progression, were also significantly higher in the hormone-treated petal discs than in the control discs (Fig. 1d). In addition, compared with those treated with ethylene or JA, the petal discs treated with 1-MCP, a powerful antagonist of ethylene action, presented a slight color loss (Fig. 1a), and this result was supported by the experimental data concerning the color fading rate (Fig. 1b), ion leakage rate (Fig. 1c), and RhSAG12 expression (Fig. 1d). Briefly, these results indicate that ethylene and JA accelerate the senescence process of rose petals and that the role of JA in petal senescence at least partly depends on ethylene signaling.

Fig. 1. Effects of ethylene and JA on the senescence of rose petal discs.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

a Color fading phenotypes; b color fading rate; c ion leakage rate; and d RhSAG12 expression levels in rose flower discs in response to ethylene, JA and 1-MCP treatment. ETH, 10 μL/L ethylene; JA, 100 μM MeJA; 1-MCP, 2 μL/L. The error bars represent the means of three biological replicates, and the letters indicate significant differences according to Duncan’s multiple range test (P < 0.05).

Expression of RhMYB108 increased with petal senescence and was induced by ethylene and JA

Analysis of the information within the expressed sequence tag (EST) database of rose petals treated with exogenous ethylene (http://bioinfo.bti.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/rose_454/index.cgi.)44 revealed a transcript, RU04450, that encodes a putative MYB family transcription factor whose expression was markedly induced in response to the application of exogenous ethylene. The cDNA sequence of RU04450 is 1129 bp in length, with a 1032 bp ORF that encodes 343 amino acid residues. Phylogenetic analysis and sequence alignment revealed that RU04450 is closely related to AtMYB108 from Arabidopsis thaliana (AT3G06490) (Supplementary Fig. 1a) and belongs to the R2R3-MYB family (Supplementary Fig. 1b); hence, the gene corresponding to RU04450 was named RhMYB108.

To further investigate the function of RhMYB108 during flower senescence, the transcripts of RhMYB108 in all rose organs were measured by qRT-PCR. As shown in Fig. 2a, the expression of RhMYB108 was greater in the rose petals than in the roots and stems, and was lowest in the leaves.

Fig. 2. qRT-PCR analysis of the expression level of RhMYB108.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

a Expression profiles of RhMYB108 in the roots, stems, leaves, and petals of rose plants. b, c, d, e, f Expression profiles of RhMYB108 in the petals, receptacles, sepals, stamens, and pistils at various stages of flower opening. g Expression of RhMYB108 in response to exogenous hormones. ETH, 10 μL/L ethylene; JA, 100 μM MeJA; 1-MCP, 2 μL/L. The petals at stage 2 were used as materials in g. RhUBI2 was used as an internal control. Three independent biological repeats were tested, and the data are presented as the means ± SDs. The letters indicate significant differences according to Duncan’s multiple range test (P < 0.05).

We further evaluated the expression of RhMYB108 transcripts in different floral organs, including the petals, sepals, receptacles, stamens, and pistils, during rose flower opening. The expression of RhMYB108 increased incrementally in the petals in parallel with flower opening (Fig. 2b), further implying that this gene may function in petal senescence. The RhMYB108 expression pattern trends were similar between the sepals and stamens (Fig. 2d, e), and the transcript levels were higher in the partially opened flower buds (stages 3–4) than at other stages. In the receptacle and pistil, RhMYB108 expression increased throughout the flower-opening process (Fig. 2c, f). In addition, we confirmed that petal senescence could be accelerated by exogenous applications of ethylene and JA. Expression of the RhMYB108 transcript was consistently induced by treatment with exogenous ethylene and JA, and compared with that in response to applications of the control solution, its expression in response to applications of the ethylene analog 1-MCP was not altered (Fig. 2g). These data provide evidence of a correlation between RhMYB108 expression and petal senescence.

Silencing of RhMYB108 delays petal senescence

To assess the biological function of RhMYB108 during the senescence of rose petals, we used VIGS specifically to silence RhMYB108 transcripts in petal discs and rose plantlets; for this, we constructed a tobacco rattle virus vector (TRV-RhMYB108) from the 3′ end fragment of RhMYB108 (431 bp in length). The rose petal disc assay revealed that color fading started at 8 days in the TRV control, and the discs were nearly discolored on day 16 (Fig. 3a). By contrast, the discs whose RhMYB108 gene was silenced exhibited a markedly delayed senescent phenotype and displayed a slight color fading at 16 days. The expression of RhMYB108 was significantly lower in the RhMYB108-silenced discs than in the TRV control discs (Fig. 3b). Consistent with this pattern, the silenced discs also presented significantly less color fading, ion leakage, and lower expression of RhSAG12 than did the TRV control discs (Fig. 3c, d, e). With respect to the petal senescence process in rose plantlets, the RhMYB108-silenced plants also displayed a distinctly slower senescent phenotype than did the control plants (Fig. 4a); expression of RhMYB108 and RhSAG12 was markedly lower in the RhMYB108-silenced plants than in the TRV control plants (Fig. 4c, d). The flower life cycle of the RhMYB108-silenced plants was 11.1 ± 1.0 days, whereas that of the TRV control plants was 7.9 ± 0.9 days (Fig. 4b). These results indicate that RhMYB108 functions as a positive regulator of the petal senescence process.

Fig. 3. Silencing of RhMYB108 delays senescence in rose petal discs.

Fig. 3

Open in a new tab

a Color fading phenotypes, b RhMYB108 expression levels, c the color fading rate, d ion leakage rates, e RhSAG12 expression levels were analyzed in RhMYB108-silenced and TRV control petal discs. The error bars represent the means of three biological replicates ± SDs, and the asterisks indicate significant differences according to Student’s t test (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001).

Fig. 4. Silencing of RhMYB108 delays petal senescence in rose plants.

Fig. 4

Open in a new tab

a The senescent phenotypes, b flower longevity, c RhMYB108 expression levels, and d RhSAG12 expression levels were analyzed in RhMYB108-silenced and TRV control plants. The results are the means of three biological replicates ± SDs, and the asterisks indicate significant differences according to Student’s t test (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001).

Ethylene- and JA-triggered petal senescence is RhMYB108 dependent

We previously found that ethylene and JA could accelerate the senescence process of rose petals and that a reduction in RhMYB108 expression led to a delayed-petal-senescence phenotype of RhMYB108-silenced plants. We therefore postulated that RhMYB108 could also function in ethylene- and JA-induced petal senescence.

To address this hypothesis further, we observed the phenotypes of RhMYB108-silenced petal discs or rose plantlets in response to applications of exogenous ethylene or JA. Compared with the TRV control discs, the RhMYB108-silenced discs presented a slightly senescent phenotype, which included mild color loss, markedly less ion leakage, and reduced SAG12 expression, after the discs were in culture dishes for 8 days after ethylene or JA treatment. By day 12 after hormone treatment, a more extreme difference in the senescent phenotype emerged between the silenced discs and the TRV control discs (Fig. 5). With respect to the petal senescence process in rose plantlets, the phenotype of the RhMYB108-silenced plants revealed delayed ethylene- and JA-induced petal senescence (Fig. 6), which is consistent with the role of RhMYB108 in the petal disc assay. These results indicate that RhMYB108 accelerates the petal senescence process mediated by both ethylene and JA signaling.

Fig. 5. Effects of exogenous ethylene and JA treatment on the senescence of RhMYB108-silenced rose petal discs.

Fig. 5

Open in a new tab

a The phenotypes of rose petal discs treated with 10 μL/L ethylene or 100 μM MeJA were recorded. b, c, d, e Color fading and ion leakage rates (b, c ethylene treatment; d, e JA treatment) of RhMYB108-silenced and TRV control petal discs. d transcript levels of RhSAG12 in RhMYB108-silenced and TRV control petal discs. Three biological replicates were tested, and the error bars represent the SDs. The asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (Student’s t test, *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001).

Fig. 6. Effects of exogenous ethylene and JA treatment on the flower senescence of RhMYB108-silenced rose plants.

Fig. 6

Open in a new tab

a The flower senescent phenotypes of rose plants treated with 10 μL/L ethylene or 100 μM MeJA were recorded. b, c The flower longevity and transcript levels of RhSAG12 in RhMYB108-silenced and TRV control rose plants treated with ethylene or JA. Three biological replicates were evaluated, and the error bars represent the SDs. The asterisks indicate statistically significant differences according to Student’s t test (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001).

RhMYB108 directly targets senescence-related genes

To determine the subcellular localization of RhMYB108, we expressed an RhMYB108-GFP protein together with NF-YA4-mCherry (an mCherry-labeled nuclear marker protein) in N. benthamiana leaves, and both proteins were driven by the pSuper promoter. We observed a GFP fluorescence signal pattern that was consistent with the localization of the nuclear marker protein (mCherry) in the nucleus, indicating that RhMYB108 is a nuclear protein (Supplementary Fig. 2a).

To confirm whether RhMYB108 acts as a transcriptional regulator, we performed a transactivation assay in N. benthamiana leaves using the dual-luciferase reporter system. Compared with the pBD-negative control, the full-length (MYB108), middle-length (MYB1081–284), and short-length (MYB1081–204) RhMYB108 variants intensely activated the reporter gene (Supplementary Fig. 2b), and the relative LUC activity was 69.7-fold, 32.5-fold, and 10.7-fold higher than that of the negative control, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 2c). These results indicate that RhMYB108 functions as a transcriptional activator and that the C-terminus has high transactivation activity.

SAGs usually serve as markers of the senescence process. Here, a series of SAG expression levels were detected using qRT-PCR in RhMYB108-silenced plants and TRV control plants. As expected, the expression of only NAC083 was obviously upregulated, acting as a senescence-inhibiting regulator45 when RhMYB108 was silenced. The expression trend of WRKY22 was markedly similar in both the RhMYB108-silenced plants and the TRV control plants, while the expression of the transcripts of NAC029, NAC053, NAC092, WRKY40, WRKY53, SAG12, and SAG113 was notably inhibited in the RhMYB108-silenced plants (Fig. 7a). These data confirmed that by regulating the expression of SAGs, RhMYB108 may act as a transcriptional activator to accelerate petal senescence.

Fig. 7. RhMYB108 directly binds to the promoter of RhNAC053, RhNAC092 and RhSAG113.

Fig. 7

Open in a new tab

a qRT-PCR analysis of SAG expression in RhMYB108-silenced petals. b Interaction of RhMYB108 protein with the SAG promoter regions, as revealed using yeast one-hybrid assays. Interactions were determined based on yeast cell growth and were confirmed by the color indication of X-β-gal on SD/-Trp/-Ura medium plates. c, d Images of firefly luciferase fluorescence signals and relative reporter activity (LUC/REN) in N. benthamiana leaves. RhMYB108 protein was separately coexpressed with pNAC053::LUC, pNAC092::LUC and pSAG113::LUC in tobacco leaves. After 48 h of Agrobacterium tumefaciens infiltration, live LUC images and relative LUC activity (LUC/REN) in tobacco leaves were assayed. The error bars represent the means of six biological replicates, and the asterisks indicate statistically significant differences according to Student’s t test (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001).

To better understand the possible regulatory mechanism that governs how RhMYB108 regulates petal senescence in rose plants, the promoter region of SAGs, including the 1.5- kb region upstream of the initiation codon, was amplified and inserted into a pLacZi vector, and the ORF of RhMYB108 was amplified and inserted into a pJG4-5 plasmid, yielding an expression vector. Y1H assays revealed that the RhMYB108 protein could bind to the promoter region of NAC053, NAC092, and SAG113, triggering the expression of the LacZ reporter gene (Fig. 7b). Additional evidence from a dual-luciferase reporter assay in N. benthamiana revealed that the activity of the promoters of NAC053, NAC092, and SAG113 could be induced by overexpression of RhMYB108 driven by the CaMV 35S promoter (Fig. 7c, d). Together, these results clarify that by directly altering SAG expression, RhMYB108 functions in the acceleration of petal senescence.

Discussion

RhMYB108 positively regulates petal senescence in rose

Petal senescence is a highly programmed event that follows visible signs, including color fading, wilting, and abscission13. At the transcriptional level, the expression of many transcription factors is altered during senescence, implying that complex regulatory networks are involved in this process46,47. As members of one of the most important families of transcription factors in plants, MYB proteins play pivotal roles in modulating multiple developmental and physiological processes. In Arabidopsis, only a few MYB transcription factors, such as MYBL48, MYBH49, and MYB250, are reportedly involved in the modulation of the senescence process. We found that RhMYB108 transcripts were more highly expressed in the petals than in other organs, including the roots, stems, and leaves (Fig. 2a). In addition, RhMYB108 expression was higher in senescent petals than in young petals during flower opening (Fig. 2b). These data implied that RhMYB108 may play a role in petal senescence. Furthermore, compared with the TRV control plants, the RhMYB108-silenced plants exhibited delayed petal senescence (Figs. 3, 4), along with less ion leakage and lower SAG12 expression. The expression of several SAGs, such as SAG12, SAG113, NAC029, NAC053, and NAC092, which serve as molecular markers of the senescence process, was downregulated in the RhMYB108-silenced lines (Fig. 7a). Additional research showed that these SAGs contain some MYB-specific cis-elements in their promoters, and our Y1H and dual-luciferase reporter assays demonstrated that these SAGs (NAC053, NAC092, and SAG113) were direct targets of RhMYB108 (Fig. 7b, c, d).

Several previous studies have demonstrated that, by acting downstream of AtMYB21, AtMYB108 can function at the transcriptional level in Arabidopsis stamen and pollen maturation in response to JA51. AtMYB108 (AtBOS1) also acts as a negative regulator in controlling wound-induced cell death mediated by ABA signaling52. Recently, by targeting the AtNAC003 promoter during dark-stressed leaf senescence, AtMYB108 was shown to directly control AtNAC003 expression53. These reports reveal that the MYB108 transcription factor participates in complex signaling and regulatory networks mediated by multiple phytohormone pathways and stress responses.

RhMYB108 mediates ethylene and JA signaling during senescence

Multiple phytohormones play a role in regulating the process of petal senescence. Among these hormones, ethylene is generally considered a senescence accelerator on the basis of increased ethylene production during petal senescence. The function of JA in leaf senescence has been widely investigated19,21,22,54; however, its role in petal senescence is currently unclear, and the detailed mechanism by which signaling crosstalk between ethylene and JA modulates petal senescence is still poorly understood.

Studies have shown that endogenous JA levels are stable during flower opening or senescence in orchids and in Lilium8,55,56. Another study showed that applications of endogenous JA could delay tepal senescence in Iris flowers by 2 days57. In contrast, treatment of Dendrobium and Petunia flowers with JA reportedly accelerated petal senescence by promoting ethylene production. In addition, applications of silver thiosulfate, an inhibitor of ethylene action, completely inhibited the effects of JA function on accelerating petal senescence23. In conclusion, the role of JA in petal senescence seems contradictory, and additional investigations are needed to reveal the definite mechanisms underlying JA-mediated petal senescence. Here, our results are consistent with those of the study by Porat et al.23 and further verify the positive effects of JA on petal senescence. In addition, the function of JA in accelerating the senescence process was abolished by applying 1-MCP, an ethylene action inhibitor (Fig. 1). Our data imply that JA may act as a promoter of petal senescence via the ethylene signaling pathway. The signaling crosstalk between ethylene and JA may depend on the interaction of JAZ-EIN3 and JAZ-EIL1. A previous paper revealed that JA could enhance the transcriptional activity of EIN3/EIL1 by removing JAZ proteins, which physically interact with and inhibit EIN3/EIL1 transcription and JA signaling by recruiting the corepressor HDA6, an RPD3-type histone deacetylase that functions in modulating histone acetylation26.

qRT-PCR analysis revealed that the expression of RhMYB108 transcripts increased in response to exogenous ethylene and JA treatment (Fig. 2g), and the results implied that RhMYB108 could be involved in the ethylene and JA signaling pathways at the transcriptional level. Overall, RhMYB108 may function as a member of the regulatory network that integrates ethylene and JA signaling to modulate the onset and progression of petal senescence. In the future, it will be interesting to investigate how ethylene and JA signaling regulates RhMYB108 transcription, which would provide further insights into the detailed mechanism that governs signaling crosstalk between ethylene and JA during petal senescence.

In this study, we identified a MYB transcription factor, RhMYB108, as being highly expressed in senescing petals as well as in petals treated with exogenous ethylene and JA. RhMYB108 belongs to the R2R3-MYB family and is closely related to AtMYB108 from Arabidopsis thaliana (AT3G06490). Silencing of RhMYB108 results in delayed petal senescence and blocks ethylene- and JA-induced petal senescence by altering the expression of SAGs, including RhNAC029, RhNAC053, RhNAC092, RhSAG12, and RhSAG113. Furthermore, RhMYB108 was identified as targeting the promoters of RhNAC053, RhNAC092, and SAG113. In brief, our findings highlight the importance of RhMYB108 in the onset of petal senescence and imply that its function may integrate ethylene- and JA signaling crosstalk during petal senescence.

Supplementary information

Supplementary material (13.6MB, docx)

Acknowledgements

We thank AJE (https://www.aje.cn/) for the careful editing of this article. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 31572162 and 31902054) and the School Project of Shenzhen Polytechnic (No. 601822K27003).

Authors' contributions

S.Z. and Q.Z. performed the experiments. N.M. and Y.L. designed the research. D.Z., J.X., H.Z. and F.W. provided technical support and conceptual advice and analyzed the data. S.Z. and N.M. wrote the paper.

Data availability

The GenBank accession number of the RhMYB108 rose gene used in this study is MK606453.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

The original version of this article was revised: The error noticed in Figure 7b has been corrected in this version.

These authors contributed equally: Shuai Zhang, Qingcui Zhao

Change history

12/27/2019

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at (10.1038/s41438-019-0221-8).

References

  • 1.Ma N, et al. Petal senescence: a hormone view. J. Exp. Bot. 2018;69:719–732. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ery009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Xu Y, Hanson MR. Programmed cell death during pollination-induced petal senescence in petunia. Plant Physiol. 2000;122:1323–1334. doi: 10.1104/pp.122.4.1323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Price AM, et al. A comparison of leaf and petal senescence in wallflower reveals common and distinct patterns of gene expression and physiology. Plant Physiol. 2008;147:1898–1912. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.120402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rogers HJ. Programmed cell death in floral organs: how and why do flowers die? Ann. Bot. 2006;97:309–315. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcj051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Van Doorn WG, Woltering EJ. Senescence and programmed cell death: substance or semantics? J. Exp. Bot. 2004;55:2147–2153. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erh264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Van Doorn W, et al. Morphological classification of plant cell deaths. Cell Death Differ. 2011;18:1241. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2011.36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Van Doorn WG. Is petal senescence due to sugar starvation? Plant Physiol. 2004;134:35–42. doi: 10.1104/pp.103.033084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tripathi SK, Tuteja N. Integrated signaling in flower senescence: an overview. Plant Signal. Behav. 2007;2:437–445. doi: 10.4161/psb.2.6.4991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kumar N, Srivastava GC, Dixit K. Flower bud opening and senescence in roses (Rosa hybrida L.) Plant Growth Regul. 2008;55:81–99. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Van Doorn WG, Woltering EJ. Physiology and molecular biology of petal senescence. J. Exp. Bot. 2008;59:453–480. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erm356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rogers HJ. From models to ornamentals: how is flower senescence regulated? Plant Mol. Biol. 2013;82:563–574. doi: 10.1007/s11103-012-9968-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Shahri W, Tahir I. Flower senescence: some molecular aspects. Planta. 2014;239:277–297. doi: 10.1007/s00425-013-1984-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lü P, et al. RhHB1 mediates the antagonism of gibberellins to ABA and ethylene during rose (Rosa hybrida) petal senescence. Plant J. 2014;78:578–590. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Trivellini A, Cocetta G, Vernieri P, Mensuali-Sodi A, Ferrante AJ. Effect of cytokinins on delaying petunia flower senescence: a transcriptome study approach. Plant Mol. Biol. 2015;87:169–180. doi: 10.1007/s11103-014-0268-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wu L, et al. An ethylene-induced regulatory module delays flower senescence by regulating cytokinin content. Plant Physiol. 2017;173:853–862. doi: 10.1104/pp.16.01064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Shabanian S, Esfahani MN, Karamian R, Tran LSP. Salicylic acid modulates cutting-induced physiological and biochemical responses to delay senescence in two gerbera cultivars. Plant Growth Regul. 2018;87:245–246. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kim J, Patterson SE, Binder BM. Reducing jasmonic acid levels causes ein2 mutants to become ethylene responsive. FEBS Lett. 2013;587:226–230. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2012.11.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ma N, Cai L, Lu WJ, Tan H, Gao JP. Exogenous ethylene influences flower opening of cut roses (Rosa hybrida) by regulating the genes encoding ethylene biosynthesis enzymes. Sci. China Ser. C. 2005;48:434. doi: 10.1360/062004-37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.He Y, Fukushige H, Hildebrand DF, Gan S. Evidence supporting a role of jasmonic acid in Arabidopsis leaf senescence. Plant Physiol. 2002;128:876–884. doi: 10.1104/pp.010843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Shibuya K, Shimizu K, Niki T, Ichimura K. Identification of a NAC transcription factor, EPHEMERAL1, that controls petal senescence in Japanese morning glory. Plant J. 2014;79:1044–1051. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hu Y, et al. Jasmonate regulates leaf senescence and tolerance to cold stress: crosstalk with other phytohormones. J. Exp. Bot. 2017;68:1361–1369. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erx004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zhang Y, et al. Circadian evening complex represses jasmonate-induced leaf senescence in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant. 2018;11:326–337. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2017.12.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Porat R, Borochov A, Halevy AH. Enhancement of petunia and dendrobium flower senescence by jasmonic acid methyl ester is via the promotion of ethylene production. Plant Growth Regul. 1993;13:297–301. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Van Doorn WG, Çelikel FG, Pak C, Harkema H. Delay of Iris flower senescence by cytokinins and jasmonates. Physiol. Plant. 2013;148:105–120. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2012.01690.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Li Z, Peng J, Wen X, Guo H. ETHYLENE-INSENSITIVE3 is a senescence-associated gene that accelerates age-dependent leaf senescence by directly repressing miR164 transcription in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2013;25:3311–3328. doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.113340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zhu Z, et al. Derepression of ethylene-stabilized transcription factors (EIN3/EIL1) mediates jasmonate and ethylene signaling synergy in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:12539–12544. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1103959108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Dubos C, et al. MYB transcription factors in Arabidopsis. Trends Plant Sci. 2010;15:573–581. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2010.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Li HL, Guo D, Peng SQ. Molecular characterization of the Jatropha curcas JcR1MYB1 gene encoding a putative R1-MYB transcription factor. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2014;37:549–555. doi: 10.1590/s1415-47572014000400011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kranz HD, et al. Towards functional characterisation of the members of the R2R3‐MYB gene family from Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1998;16:263–276. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00278.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Stracke R, Werber M, Weisshaar BJ. The R2R3-MYB gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2001;4:447–456. doi: 10.1016/s1369-5266(00)00199-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Jiang C, Gu J, Chopra S, Gu X, Peterson TJ. Ordered origin of the typical two-and three-repeat Myb genes. Gene. 2004;326:13–22. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2003.09.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Cheng HQ, et al. The cotton MYB108 forms a positive feedback regulation loop with CML11 and participates in the defense response against Verticillium dahliae infection. J. Exp. Bot. 2016;67:1935–1950. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erw016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Du YT, et al. Identification and characterization of GmMYB118 responses to drought and salt stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2018;18:320. doi: 10.1186/s12870-018-1551-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zhang S, et al. In rose, transcription factor PTM balances growth and drought survival via PIP2;1 aquaporin. Nat. Plants. 2019;5:290–299. doi: 10.1038/s41477-019-0376-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Xue J, Yang F, Gao J. Isolation of Rh-TIP1;1, an aquaporin gene and its expression in rose flowers in response to ethylene and water deficit. Postharvest. Biol. Tec. 2009;51:407–413. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wan CY, Wilkins TA. A modified hot borate method significantly enhances the yield of high-quality RNA from cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Anal. Biochem. 1994;223:7–12. doi: 10.1006/abio.1994.1538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hellens RP, et al. Transient expression vectors for functional genomics, quantification of promoter activity and RNA silencing in plants. Plant Methods. 2005;1:13. doi: 10.1186/1746-4811-1-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Yin X, Allan AC, Chen K, Ferguson IB, Kiwifruit EIL. and ERF genes involved in regulating fruit ripening. Plant Physiol. 2010;153:1280–1292. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.157081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wei Q, et al. Control of chrysanthemum flowering through integration with an aging pathway. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:829. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00812-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Han, Y. et al. Banana transcription factor MaERF11 recruits histone deacetylase MaHDA1 and represses the expression of MaACO1 and expansins during fruit ripening. Plant Physiol.171, 1070–1084 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 41.Tian J, et al. TRV–GFP: a modified Tobacco rattle virus vector for efficient and visualizable analysis of gene function. J. Exp. Bot. 2013;65:311–322. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ert381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hall TA. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 1999;41:95–98. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Liu J, et al. A RhABF2/Ferritin module affects rose (Rosa hybrida) petal dehydration tolerance and senescence by modulating iron levels. Plant J. 2017;92:1157–1169. doi: 10.1111/tpj.13751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Pei H, et al. Integrative analysis of miRNA and mRNA profiles in response to ethylene in rose petals during flower opening. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e64290. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Yang SD, Seo PJ, Yoon HK, Park CM. The Arabidopsis N. A. C. transcription factor VNI2 integrates abscisic acid signals into leaf senescence via the COR/RD genes. Plant Cell. 2011;23:2155–2168. doi: 10.1105/tpc.111.084913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Liu X, et al. LSD: a leaf senescence database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;39:D1103–D1107. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq1169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Breeze E, et al. High-resolution temporal profiling of transcripts during Arabidopsis leaf senescence reveals a distinct chronology of processes and regulation. Plant Cell. 2011;23:873–894. doi: 10.1105/tpc.111.083345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Zhang X, et al. The RR-type MYB-like transcription factor, AtMYBL, is involved in promoting leaf senescence and modulates an abiotic stress response in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2010;52:138–148. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcq180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Huang CK, et al. A single-repeat MYB transcription repressor, MYBH, participates in regulation of leaf senescence in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol. Biol. 2015;88:269–286. doi: 10.1007/s11103-015-0321-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Guo Y, Gan S. AtMYB2 regulates whole plant senescence by inhibiting cytokinin-mediated branching at late stages of development in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2011;156:1612–1619. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.177022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Mandaokar A, Browse J. MYB108 acts together with MYB24 to regulate jasmonate-mediated stamen maturation in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2008;149:851–862. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.132597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Cui F, Brosché M, Sipari N, Tang S, Overmyer K. Regulation of ABA dependent wound induced spreading cell death by MYB108. N. Phytol. 2013;200:634–640. doi: 10.1111/nph.12456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Chou ML, et al. The direct involvement of dark-induced Tic55 protein in chlorophyll catabolism and its indirect role in the MYB108-NAC signaling pathway during leaf senescence in Arabidopsis thaliana. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018;19:1854. doi: 10.3390/ijms19071854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Jiang Y, Liang G, Yang S, Yu D. Arabidopsis WRKY57 functions as a node of convergence for jasmonic acid- and auxin-mediated signaling in jasmonic acid-induced leaf senescence. Plant Cell. 2014;26:230–245. doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.117838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Porat R, Halevy A, Serek M, Borochov AJ. An increase in ethylene sensitivity following pollination is the initial event triggering an increase in ethylene production and enhanced senescence of Phalaenopsis orchid flowers. Physiol. Plant. 1995;93:778–784. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Arrom L, Munné-Bosch S. Hormonal changes during flower development in floral tissues of Lilium. Planta. 2012;236:343–354. doi: 10.1007/s00425-012-1615-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Imsabai W, Van Doorn WG. Effects of auxin, gibberellin, and cytokinin on petal blackening and flower opening in cut lotus flowers (Nelumbo nucifera) Postharvest. Biol. Tech. 2013;75:54–57. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material (13.6MB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

The GenBank accession number of the RhMYB108 rose gene used in this study is MK606453.

Articles from Horticulture Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES