Abstract
Background:
Leishmania major and Leishmania tropica are two main species causing cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) in Iran. Recently, Crithidia spp. has also been reported in the wound of patients with CL. In this study, we determined the species causing CL in the southern of Iran and the role of Crithidia spp. in creating skin ulcers.
Methods:
In this cross-sectional study from Apr to Sep 2016, 66 patients with CL referred to Diagnostic Lab of Leishmaniasis, Valfajr Health Center, Shiraz, Iran, were selected. After DNA extraction from the Giemsa stained smears, all samples were amplified in two separate steps using specific primers, firstly, to differentiate Leishmania species and then to identify Crithidia spp.
Results:
Two species L. major and L. tropica were responsible for 60 and 6 cases, respectively. Moreover, in two patients, mixed infection with Crithidia was confirmed. In mix infection cases, the morphology of the cutaneous ulcers was not different from the wounds of other patients.
Conclusion:
Leishmania major is responsible for the most common CL in southern Iran. In addition, in two patients with L. major and L. tropica, mix infection with Crithidia was confirmed. The potential role of Crithidia as the main factor for CL and the probability of this parasite to have synergistic effects on Leishmania, as a hypothesis, requires more comprehensive researches on the ambiguity of this protozoon.
Keywords: Cutaneous leishmaniasis, Leishmania, Crithidia, Iran
Introduction
Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is one of the six important diseases in tropical and subtropical regions which WHO has recommended and supported researches on its various aspects (1, 2).
The factor causing CL is various species of bloody-tissue protozoan parasites called Leishmania (3). This disease has distributed to all continents of the world except Australia and it can be seen in 88 countries. Annually, 1–1.5 million people in the world become infected with Leishmania and a population of about 350 million people are at risk for this disease (4, 5). About 90% of CL cases worldwide are reported from seven countries: Afghanistan, Algeria, Brazil, Iran, Peru, Saudi Arabia and Syria (6) which among these countries, Iran and Saudi Arabia have the highest incidence of the disease (7).
About 20,000 CL cases are reported annually from different parts of Iran estimated that the real rate is several times higher (8). In recent years, the prevalence CL in Iran, especially in the southern regions, has been growing gradually and alarmingly and is endemic in 17 out of 31 provinces of Iran (9), as the number of positive cases has increased from 1560 in 1991 to 3861 in 2001 (10, 11). In an epidemiological survey about CL in Iran during 2013–2015, CL is an endemic disease in Fars Province, and it annually infects numerous people (12). In general, provinces such as Fars and Isfahan with an incidence of 1.66 cases per 1,000 people, have the highest incidence of the disease in the country (13).
Leishmania major and L. tropica are two main species causing CL in Iran (9), which have a different distribution in different parts of the country (14).
In recent studies, besides these two species, some trypanosomatidal protozoa including Herpetomonas spp., Leptomonas spp. and Crithidia spp. have also been reported in the culture of cutaneous ulcers (15–17). Crithidia spp. are classified in Kinetoplastida order and Mastigophora subphylum and are often referred to as insects’ parasites (16). Two species (Crithidia lucilia and Crithidia fasciculata) are also considered to be infectious agents of the Leishmania culture medium (18, 19). However, the interesting thing is that the patients who the Crithidia spp. have been isolated from their wounds are often drug resistant to various drugs, and their cutaneous ulcers sometimes remain for 2–3yr and become chronic (17), which is probably due to the presence of Crithidia alone or simultaneously with Leishmania spp. as mix-infection in these groups. In Iran, Crithidia spp. has been reported frequently from patients suspected of drug-resistant cutaneous leishmaniasis and the genomic sequence of the ribosomal region has proven its belonging to the genus Crithidia (17). In another study, Crithidia was isolated from the spleen and foot-pad of Tetera indica in Fars Province, Iran which considers the presence and role of this protozoon in infecting vertebrate hosts (20). Crithidia spp. are able to present simultaneously with some trypanosomatidal parasites such as Leishmania spp. and be transferred to different hosts (21). For the first time reported that C. deanei has the ability to infect mouse fibroblast cells (22). In the following in 2010, it concluded the ability of this species to cause infections in BALB/c (23).
Since the establishment of a specific species of Leishmania parasite in a geographical region depends on several factors such as the presence of a specific vector and a suitable reservoir (24), the determination of the dominant species in an endemic or hyper-endemic region can be important for adopting an appropriate strategy to control vectors and reservoirs. Furthermore, identification of species is essential for more effective treatment of the patients due to the fact that the response to treatment varies in different species (13). Therefore, considering the high incidence of CL and its health importance, we decided to determine the species causing CL in the southern region of Iran and the role of Crithidia spp. in creating skin ulcers by using the molecular methods.
Materials and Methods
Sample Preparation
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Bushehr University of Medical Sciences (Ethics Committee code: IR.BPUMS.REC.1395.125) and informed consent was signed by each of the patients.
In this cross-sectional study, in a period of 6 months from Apr to Sep 2016, patients with cutaneous ulcers referred to the Diagnostic Lab of Leishmaniasis, Valfajr Health Center, Shiraz, Iran were tested. Smears of them from exudates of margin of the wounds were prepared and stained with Giemsa. Finally 66 patients with CL were selected. Then a questionnaire containing demographic information and some of the variables such as age, sex, etc. were completed separately for each patient.
DNA Extraction
DNA was extracted from the Giemsa stained smears using the commercial kit (Favorgen Biotech Corp, Cat No. FABGK001, Taiwan). Briefly, the smears on the slides were scratched and collected by lysis buffer into the microtubes and after the addition of proteinase K, incubated initially for 1 h at 60 °C and then 10min at 70 °C. By addition of absolute ethanol and transferring the samples to the column, the rest of the process was carried out according to the kit’s manufacturer’s protocol.
PCR and Gel Electrophoresis
All extracted DNA samples were PCR-amplified in two separate steps. First, a pair of primers LIN4R and LIN17 were used to detect and differentiate of three species L. major, L. infantum and L. tropica, and in the next step, in order to identify Crithidia spp., CRF and CRR primers were used in this purpose. Further details about the sequence of primers used and the PCR programs adjusted for the amplification of both genomic pieces, has been presented in Table 1.
Table 1.
Characteristics of primers and temperature patterns used in PCR tests
| Genus | Primers | Sequence | Program | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Processes | Cycles | Temp | Time | |||
| Leishmania | LIN4R (F) | 5′- GGG GTT GGT GTA AAA TAG GG -3′ | P. denaturation | 1 | 95 °C | 5min |
| Denaturation | 94 °C | 30sec | ||||
| LIN17 (R) | 5′- TTT GAA CGG GAT TTC TG -3′ | Annealing | 35 | 52 °C | 30sec | |
| Extension | 72 °C | 45sec | ||||
| Final Extension | 1 | 72 °C | 8min | |||
| Crithidia | FCR (F) | 5′- TCC ATG TGC GAG GAC AAC GTG CT -3′ | P. denaturation | 1 | 94 °C | 3min |
| Denaturation | 95 °C | 30sec | ||||
| RCR (F) | 3′- CGC GTC GTT GAT GAA GTC GCT -5′ | Annealing | 30 | 62 °C | 30sec | |
| Extension | 72 °C | 45sec | ||||
| Final Extension | 1 | 72 °C | 5min | |||
PCR products were separated on 1.2% agarose gel and TAE (Tris, Acetate, and EDTA) buffer, and the obtained bands were detected by a UV detector (Bio-Rad, USA)
Statistical analysis
The results and data of the questionnaires were analyzed using SPSS software version 18 and chi-square test and P-values. At levels < .05, the P-values were considered as statistically significant.
Results
Of the 66 patients, L. major and L. tropica were responsible for 60 and 6 cases, respectively (Fig. 1). Moreover, in two patients with L. major and L. tropica, mix infection with Crithidia was confirmed (Fig. 2).
Fig. 1.

Electrophoresis of PCR products using LIN4R and LIN17 primers on agarose gel 1.2% to differentiate Leishmania species. Lane 1: Molecular weight marker, Lane 2: Positive control for L. major, Lane 3: Positive control for L. tropica, Lane 4: Negative control, Lane 5, 6: Positive samples for L. major, Lane 7, 8: Positive samples for L. tropica
Fig. 2.

Electrophoresis of PCR products using CRF and CRR primers on agarose gel 1.2% to identify Crithidia spp. Lane 1: Molecular weight marker, Lane 2: Positive control for Crithidia spp, Lane 3: Negative control, Lane 4, 5: Positive samples for Crithidia spp., Lane 6: Molecular weight marker
There was no significant relationship between the disease-causing species and the factors such as the number, appearance, and location of the wounds in the body, the residence as well as the age and gender of the patients (Table 2).
Table 2.
Demographic features of the patients with CL and the relationship of disease-causing species and some variables
| Variables | Species | P-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| L. major n (%) | L. tropica n (%) | Crithidia+Leishmania n (%) | ||
| Sex | ||||
| Male | 33 (50) | 2 (3) | 1 (1.5) | 0.78 |
| Female | 26 (39.4) | 3 (4.5) | 1 (1.5) | |
| Age(yr) | 0.73 | |||
| < 10 | 6 (9.1) | 1 (1.5) | 0 (0) | |
| 10–20 | 9 (13.6) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| 20–30 | 9 (13.6) | 1 (1.5) | 1 (1.5) | |
| 30–40 | 11 (16.7) | 2 (3) | 0 (0) | |
| > 40 | 24 (36.4) | 1 (1.5) | 1 (1.5) | |
| Residence | 0.30 | |||
| City | 46 (69.7) | 5 (7.6) | 1 (1.5) | |
| Village | 13 (19.7) | 0 (0) | 1 (1.5) | |
| City | 0.99 | |||
| Shiraz | 41 (62.1) | 5 (7.6) | 2 (3) | |
| Marvdasht | 1 (1.5) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| Daryun | 7 (10.6) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| Kharameh | 1 (1.5) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| Tiun | 2 (3) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| Meimand | 2 (3) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| Maharlou | 1 (1.5) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| Sharifabad | 4 (6.1) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| Number of wounds | 0.53 | |||
| 1 | 23 (34.8) | 3 (4.5) | 1 (1.5) | |
| 2–5 | 22 (33.3) | 2 (3) | 0 (0) | |
| > 5 | 14 (21.2) | 0 (0) | 1 (1.5) | |
| Duration the advent of the wounds | 0.64 | |||
| 1–4 wk | 22 (33.3) | 1 (1.5) | 1 (1.5) | |
| 4–8 wk | 24 (36.4) | 2 (3) | 0 (0) | |
| > 8 wk | 13 (19.7) | 2 (3) | 1 (1.5) | |
In two patients with mix infection (Leishmania and Crithidia), the morphology of the cutaneous ulcers was not different from the wounds of the other patients.
Discussion
Cutaneous leishmaniasis is one of the vector-borne diseases and is caused by various species of Leishmania spp. (3, 25). Establishment of a specific species of this parasite in any geographical region depends on several factors such as the presence of appropriate reservoir and vector, and determining the dominant species in each area can be very important in controlling the life cycle as well as the more effective treatment of the disease (13).
The isolation and mass cultivation of parasite in order to determine the species is not only very time-consuming but also is expensive (26, 27), therefore, in the present study, Giemsa stained slides were used for this purpose to reduce the costs and overcome the problem.
The success of DNA extraction from these smears has already been studied (26). Furthermore, the primers used for PCR in various studies were able to identify the genus, so to determine the parasite species, the researchers had to develop advanced molecular methods, such as PCR-RFLP or sequencing. In this study, we used the primers previously designed based on the variable part of DNA minicircles in kinatoplast (13, 28, 29). These primers have the ability to identify three species so that by electrophoresis of the PCR product, L. major, L. infantum and L. tropica create a specific band in the 650, 720 and 760 bases, respectively. The specificity of 100% has been reported for PCR tests using primers LIN4R and LIN17 to detect Leishmania in atypical cases (13, 30).
In some endemic and hyper-endemic regions of Iran L. major and in other areas, L. tropica plays a role in causing disease, although, in southern regions such as Fars Province, considered as one of the most important foci in Iran, both species are listed as endemic factors (24, 31). Recently, alongside these two dominant parasites, Crithidia spp. has been reported from cultivation of cutaneous ulcers of patients (15, 16).
In this study, in order to determine the role of Crithidia spp. in cutaneous lesions, samples were again amplified with two specific FCR and PCR primers. In two CL cases, there was a mix infection by Leishmania and Crithidia and, as shown in Fig. 2, a band in 850 bases characterizes this parasite (Fig. 2). Crithidia spp. are classified in flagellate subphylum and are often considered as insect parasites (16). Since the sequence of their rRNA (Ribosomal RNA) gene is very close to Leishmania, they are usually associated with together (16, 18). Crithidia spp. are considered as infectious agents of the Leishmania culture medium. Crithidia lucilia and C. fasciculata are two important species of this genus (18).
Over the past 20 years, various methods have been developed to determine the different subspecies of Leishmania and Crithidia, as well as to study the molecular diversity and the interaction between this parasite and the host (32–34). In recent reports, besides two L. major and L. tropica species, Crithidia spp. has also been proven in the wound of patients with CL, and interestingly, even in some of these reports, Crithidia has been reported as the only factor isolated from the wound of mentioned patients. In a study to investigate the polymorphism of two species L. tropica and L. major in the central and desert regions of Iran, Crithidia has been isolated from 6 of 215 and 3 of 125 patients with cutaneous ulcers in Isfahan and Bam, respectively. Molecular analysis of Crithidia-positive samples using BLAST software has shown that their sequence is 97 % similar to C. fasciculata and 90% to C. lucilia (15).
Conclusion
The main cause of CL in southern Iran is primarily L. major and then L. tropica. Moreover, in two patients with L. major and L. tropica, mix infection with Crithidia was confirmed. And more importantly, the potential role of Crithidia as the main cause of the cutaneous ulcers or the probability to have synergistic effects on Leishmania cutaneous ulcers, as a hypothesis, needs more comprehensive researches on the ambiguity of this protozoon.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the Vice-Chancellor for Research of Bushehr University of Medical Sciences for financial support (Grant Number: IR.BPUMS.REC.1395.125).
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.
References
- 1.World Health Organization (2010) Control of the leishmaniasis. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. (949): xii–xiii. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Khosravi A, Sharifi I, Barati M, Zarean M, Hakimi-Parizi M. (2011) Anti-leishmanial effect of nanosilver solutions on Leishmania tropica promastigotes by invitro assay. ZJRMS. 13(7): 8–12. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Gutiérrez V, Seabra AB, Reguera RM, Khandare J, Calderón M. (2016) New approaches from nanomedicine for treating leishmaniasis. Chem Soc Rev. 45 (1): 152–168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Fouladvand M, Barazesh A, Farokhzad F, Malekizadeh H, Sartavi K. (2011) Evaluation of invitro anti-leishmanial activity of some brown, green and red algae from the Persian Gulf. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 15(6): 597–600. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Khan W, Kumar N. (2011) Drug targeting to macrophages using paromomycin-loaded albumin microspheres for treatment of visceral leishmaniasis: an in vitro evaluation. J Drug Target. 19(4): 239–250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Desjeux P. (2004) Leishmaniasis: current situation and new perspectives. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 27: 305–318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Nejati J, Mojadam M, Hanafi-Bojd AA, Keyhani A, Habibi-Nodeh F. (2014) An epidemiological study of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Andimeshk (2005–2010). Journal of Ilam University of Medical Sciences. 21(7): 94–101. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sharifi I, Zamani F, Aflatoonian MR, Fekri A. (2008) Reported an epidemic of cutaneous leishmaniasis, and factors that may cause the city of Bam in Kerman Province. Iran J Epidemiol. 4(1): 53–58. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Doroodgar M, Doroodgar M, Mahboobi S, Doroodgar A. (2018) Epidemiological aspects of cutaneous leishmaniasis during 2009–2016 in Kashan City, Central Iran. Korean J Parasitol. 56(1): 21–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Rassi Y, Gassemi MM, Javadian E, Rafizadeh S, Motazedian H, Vatandoost H. (2007) Vectors and reservoirs of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Marvdasht District, Southern Islamic Republic of Iran. East Mediterr Health J. 13(3): 686–693. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Almasi-Hashiani A, Shirdare M, Emadi J, Esfandiari M, Pourmohammadi B, Hossieni S. (2012) Epidemiological study of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Marvdasht, Fars Province, Iran. Journal of North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences. 3(4): 15–23. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Nikouee F, Soltanian M, Babaee F, Motamed-Jahromi M. (2017) Cutaneous leishmaniasis: an epidemiological survey in Iran during 2013–2015. J Nurs Mid Sci. 4(1): 58–62. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Pagheh AS, Fakhar M, Mesgarian F, Gholami S, Badiee F. (2012) Detection and identification of causative agent of cutaneous leishmaniasis using specific PCR. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci. 21 (1): 85–92. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Shirzadi MR, Esfahania SB, Mohebalia M, Ershadia MRY, Gharachorlo F, Razavia MR, Postigo JAR. (2015) Epidemiological status of leishmaniasis in the Islamic Republic of Iran, 1983–2012. East Mediterr Health J. 21(10): 736–742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Doudi M, Eslami G, Setorki M, Hegazi SH. (2011) The study of genetic polymorphism of Leishmania major and Leishmania tropica by PCR-RFLP technique in two hyper-endemic regions: Isfahan and Bam, Iran. AMUJ. 14(4): 20–29. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Doudi M, Setorki M, Eslami G, Hejazi SH. (2014) The molecular epidemiology of Crithidia strains in Isfahan City and surrounding areas, Iran. J Isfahan Med Sch. 32(275): 182–193. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ghobakhloo N, Motazedian MH, Naderi S, Ebrahimi S. (2019) Isolation of Crithidia spp. from lesions of immunocompetent patients with suspected cutaneous leishmaniasis in Iran. Trop Med Int Health. 24(1): 116–126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Doudi M, Hejazi SH, Razavi MR, Narimani M, Khanjani S, Eslami G. (2010) Comparative molecular epidemiology of Leishmania major and Leishmania tropica by PCR-RFLP technique in hyper endemic cities of Isfahan and Bam, Iran. Med Sci Monit. 16(11): CR530–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ishemgulova A, Butenko A, Kortišová L, Boucinha C, Grybchuk-Ieremenko A, Morelli KA, Tesařová M, Kraeva N, Grybchuk D, Pánek T, Flegontov P. (2017) Molecular mechanisms of thermal resistance of the insect trypanosomatid Crithidia thermophila. PloS One. 12(3): e0174165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kalantari M, Motazedian MH, Asgari Q, Mohammadpour I, Soltani A, Azizi K. (2018) Co-detection and isolation of Leishmania and Crithidia among naturally infected Tatera indica (Rodentia: Muridae) in Fars Province, southern Iran. Asian Pacific J Trop Biomed. 8(5): 279. [Google Scholar]
- 21.de Souza W, Motta MC. (1999) Endosymbiosis in protozoa of the Trypanosomatidae family. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 173(1): 1–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Santos DO, Bourguignon SC, Castro HC, Silva JS, Franco LS, Hespanhol R, Soares MJ, Corte-Real S. (2004) Infection of mouse dermal fibroblasts by the monoxenous trypanosomatid protozoa Crithidia deanei and Herpetomonas roitmani. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 51(5): 570–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Santos DO, Bourguignon SC, Castro HC, Miranda A, Vieira RT, Corte-Real S, Bastos OM. (2010) Crithidia deanei infection in normal and dexamethasone–immunosuppressed Balb/c mice. Health. 2: 589–594. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Baghaei A, Jasbi E, Akhoundi M, Mirzaei H, Dehnam O. (2012) Microscopic and molecular detection of Leishmania species among suspected patients of cutaneous leishmaniasis using ITS-r DNA in Fars Province. JSSU. 20(4): 464–473. [Google Scholar]
- 25.den Boer M, Argaw D, Jannin J, Alvar J. (2011) Leishmaniasis impact and treatment access. Clin Microbiol Infect. 17: 1471–1477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Motazedian MH, Karamian M, Ardehali SS, Hanjani F. (2004) Characterization of Leishmania parasites from archived geimsa-stained slides using Nested Polymerase Chain Reaction. J Med Res. 2 (4): 1–9. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Motazedian MH, Noamanpoor B, Ardehali S. (2002) Characterization of Leishmania parasites isolated from different provinces of Iran. East Mediterr Health J. 8: 338–844. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Noyes H, Reyburn AH, Bailey WJ, Smith D. (1998) A nested-PCR-based schizoderme method for identifying Leishmania kinetoplast minicircle classes directly from clinical samples. J Clin Microbiol. 36: 2877–2881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Vince A, Poljak M, Seme K. (1998) DNA extraction from archival Giemsa-stained bone marrow slides: Comparison of six rapid methods. Br J Haematol. 101: 349–351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Karamian M, Motazedian MH, Fakhar M, Pakshir K, Jowkar F, Rezanezhad H. (2008) Atypical presentation of old-world cutaneous leishmaniasis, diagnosis and species identification by PCR. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 22(8): 958–962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Pourmohammadi B, Motazedian MH, Hatam GR, Kalantari M, Habibi P, Sarkari B. (2010) Comparison of three methods for diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis. Iran J Parasitol. 5(4): 1–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Baker JR, Muller R, Rollinson D. (1998) Advances in Parasitology. London, UK: Academic Press; pp. 215–240. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Bailey MS, Lockwood DNJ. (2007) Cutaneous leishmaniasis. Clin Dermatol. 25 (2): 203–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Banuls AL, Brisse S, Sidibe I, Noel S, Tibayrenc M. (1999) A phylogenetic analysis by multilocus enzyme electrophoresis and multiprimer random amplified polymorphic DNA fingerprinting of the Leishmania genome project Friedlin reference strain. Folia Parasitol. 46(1): 10–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
