Abstract
Background:
Mosquitoes are very important vectors of diseases to human. We aimed to establish the first spatial database on the mosquitoes of Isfahan Province, central Iran, and to predict the geographical distribution of species with medical importance.
Methods:
Mosquito larvae were collected from eight counties of Isfahan Province during 2014. Collected data were transferred to a database in ArcGIS and the distribution maps were created. MaxEnt model and jackknife analysis were used to predict the geographical distribution of two medical important species, and to find the effective variables for each species.
Results:
Totally, 1143 larvae were collected including 6 species, Anopheles maculipennis s.l., An. superpictus s.l., An. marteri, Culex hortensis, Cx. theileri and Culiseta longiareolata. The area under curve in MaxEnt model was 0.951 and 0.873 rather 1 for An. maculipennis s.l. and Cx. theileri, respectively. Culex theileri had wider and more appropriate niches across the province, except for the eastern area. The environmental variable with highest gain was mean temperature of the wettest quarter for Cx. theileri and temperature seasonality for An. maculipennis. Culex theileri, An. maculipennis s.l. and An. superpictus, three important vectors of parasitic agents to humans, were collected in this study.
Conclusion:
The mosquito collected and mapped can be considered for transmission of malaria and filariasis in the region. Bearing in mind the results of niche modeling for vector species, more studies on vectorial capacity and resistance status to different insecticides of these species are recommended.
Keywords: Culicidae, Spatial distribution, Culex theileri, Anopheles maculipennis s.l, Ecological niche modeling
Introduction
Mosquitoes are one of the most important groups of medical arthropods and transmit malaria, filariasis, different arboviruses and encephalitis as well as annoyance due to their bites (1). A serological study in 1970s showed West Nile infection was relatively common in Iran with a prevalence of 30%, while infection with Sindbis virus was very rare (2).
Culex theileri is the principal epidemic vector of Rift Valley fever virus (Bunyaviridae: Phlebovirus) on the inland plateau of southern Africa (3). Dirofilariasis due to Dirofilaria immitis and D. repens and setariasis have been reported in current studies from some parts of Iran, while West Nile Virus is also detected in current studies from the birds, horse, human and mosquitoes (4–14). This is in accordance with the global trends of these diseases, although both animal and human cases of this disease are under estimated (15, 16).
Study on the mosquitoes of Iran has a long history and is conducted on different aspects such as fauna, distribution, parasitic infection, resistance to insecticides and modeling distribution (5, 6, 17–20). Culex theileri is reported from 27 out of 31 provinces of Iran including Ardabil, West Azarbaijan, East Azarbaijan, Bushehr, Charmahal and Bakhtiari, Fars, Guilan, Hamadan, Hormozgan, Ilam, Isfahan, Kerman, Kermanshah, South Khorassan, North Khorassan, Khorassan-e Razavi, Khuzestan, Kohgiluyeh and Boyerahmad, Kordestan, Lorestan, Markazi, Mazandaran, Qom, Sistan and Baluchestan, Tehran, Yazd, and Zanjan (21).
Anopheles maculipennis s.l. is one of the main malaria vectors in its distribution areas including Iran (22). It is reported from 20 provinces of Iran including Ardabil, West Azarbaijan, East Azarbaijan, Charmahal and Bakhtiari, Guilan, Golestan, Hamadan, Isfahan, Kermanshah, Khorassan-e Razavi, North Khorassan, Kohgiluyeh and Boyerahmad, Kordestan, Qazvin, Lorestan, Markazi, Mazandaran, Semnan, Tehran, and Zanjan (22).
Despite activities regarding mosquito control in Iran, there is still the problem of painful bites of these insects, especially in central areas like Isfahan, Arak, Semnan, and Tehran provinces. Due to the vital role of health in development programs, and because the study on ecology and bionomics of mosquitoes is one of the important indices that have a fundamental role in development of ecotourism industry, proper knowledge from behavioral characteristics and bionomics of mosquitoes in different ecological conditions is one of the main factors in planning the strategy to combat the mosquitoes. Isfahan Province is one of the main poles for industry and tourism in Iran. Although rare studies have been done in past (23, 24), but still there is no comprehensive survey on vector(s) bioecology in different climates, seasons, temperatures, and so on. With due attention to the extensive climate change in the world and Iran as well, accurate study on the ecology and bionomics of mosquitoes are necessary due to their important role in disease transmission, especially arboviruses. Data collection on their biodiversity, distribution and ecology will provide guideline for appropriate vector control.
Geographic Information Systems (GIS) is a rapidly growing technology that combines graphics features with the environmental data obtained from the vectors of disease. This ability helps us to assess the distribution and bioecology of vector species. In last two decades using GIS in vector-borne diseases has increased and a new field of investigation has been opened. Creating databases, mapping, spatial and statistical analysis of vector-borne diseases are results of this new branch of science (25).
This study aimed to establish the first spatial database on the mosquitoes of Isfahan Province and to predict the geographical distribution of medically important species.
Materials and Methods
Study Area
The Isfahan Province covers an area of approximately 107,027km2 and is situated in the center of Iran (Fig. 1). The province experiences a moderate and dry climate, on the whole, ranging between 40.6 °C and 10.6 °C on a cold day in the winter season. The average annual temperature has been recorded as 16.7 °C and the annual rainfall on an average has been reported as 116.9mm. More than 5 million peoples are living in 24 counties of this province. Isfahan is destination of millions of tourists from different parts of Iran and other countries.
Entomological Survey
Sampling was conducted two times during summer 2015 from 8 counties (Khomeinishahr, Golpayegan, Faridan, Khansar, Mobarakeh, Fereidoonshahr, Najafabad, Samirom) in three main topographic areas of Isfahan Province. Mosquito larvae were collected by the standard dipping method. Coordinates of the collections sites were recorded using a GPS device. Species were transferred to the laboratory, mounted and identified morphologically (26).
All the mounted slides were deposited in the Medical Entomology Museum, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences under code of GC22ST11-94.
Creating Database and Mapping
All collected data obtained from this entomological survey were transferred to a relevant database in ArcGIS and then the distribution maps were created.
Modeling
MaxEnt model and bioclimatic variables were used to predict and to map the geographical distribution of medically important species which had enough occurrence data points (27). Jackknife test in MaxEnt model was used to find the effective variables for each species. The bioclimatic data were downloaded from the worldclim database in 1km2 spatial resolution (version1.4, http://www.worldclim.org/past). They were included Bio1 (Annual mean temperature (oC), Bio 2 (Mean diurnal range: mean of monthly (max temp–min temp) (°C)), Bio3 (Isothermality: (Bio2/Bio7)× 100), Bio4 (Temperature seasonality (SD× 100)), Bio5 (Maximum temperature of warmest month (°C)), Bio6 (Minimum temperature of coldest month (°C)), Bio7 (Temperature annual range (Bio5−Bio6) (°C)), Bio8 (Mean temperature of wettest quarter (°C)), Bio9 (Mean temperature of driest quarter (°C)), Bio10 (Mean temperature of warmest quarter (°C)), Bio11 (Mean temperature of coldest quarter (°C)), Bio12 (Annual precipitation (mm)), Bio13 (Precipitation of wettest month (mm)), Bio14 (Precipitation of driest month (mm)), Bio15 (Precipitation seasonality (coefficient of variation)), Bio16 (Precipitation of wettest quarter (mm)), Bio17 (Precipitation of driest quarter (mm)), Bio18 (Precipitation of warmest quarter (mm)) and Bio19 (Precipitation of coldest quarter (mm)). Two environmental variables were also used for modeling i.e. altitude (m) and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI). The first variable was derived from the Digital Elevation Model (DEM) of Iran with the same resolution, while NDVI was acquired from Aug 2014 image of MODIS satellite.
Results
Species Composition
Overall, 1143 mosquito larvae were collected including 6 species: Anopheles maculipennis s.l. (24), An. superpictus s.l. (4), An. marteri (10), Culex hortensis (454), Cx. theileri (429) and Culiseta longiareolata (222). The most and the least density was due to Cx. hortensis (39.72%) and An. superpictus s.l (0.35%), respectively (Table 1). Anopheles maculipennis s.l. was collected from both plain and foothill areas, but we could not find this malaria vectors in mountainous areas of Isfahan Province. Culex theileri and Cx. hortensis were the most aboundant species. Regardless of the topography of the area, they were caught in all the studied areas.
Table 1.
County | Topography | Total Larvae (No.) | No. and frequency of species | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
An. maculipennis s.l | An. superpictus s.l. | An. marteri | Cx. hortensis | Cx. theieri | Cs. longiareolata | |||||||||
No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | |||
Khomeinishahr | Plain | 129 | 16 | 12.4 | 2 | 1.56 | 2 | 1.56 | 12 | 9.3 | 86 | 66.66 | 11 | 8.52 |
Golpayegan | Plain | 50 | 4 | 8.3 | 2 | 4.2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 12.5 | 36 | 75 | 0 | 0 |
Mobarakeh | Plain | 65 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 33 | 50.77 | 32 | 49.23 | 0 | 0 |
Najafabad | Plain | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 57 | 61.95 | 35 | 38.05 | 0 | 0 |
Faridan | Foothill | 115 | 4 | 3.47 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 6.96 | 0 | 0 | 34 | 29.57 | 69 | 60 |
Khansar | Foothill | 247 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 152 | 61.54 | 42 | 17 | 53 | 21.46 |
Fereidoonshahr | Mountain | 354 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 129 | 36.64 | 134 | 38.08 | 89 | 25.28 |
Samirom | Mountain | 93 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 65 | 69.89 | 28 | 303.11 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 1143 | 24 | 2.1 | 4 | 0.35 | 10 | 0.88 | 454 | 39.72 | 429 | 37.53 | 222 | 19.42 |
MaxEnt Modeling
This method was used to find the appropriate niches for Cx. theileri and An. maculipennis s.l. To do this, all collection points in this study, as well as earlier studies in Isfahan Province (1984–2015), were used to have enough occurrence data for modeling (Fig. 1). Figure 2 shows the collection sites for the studied species. The area under curve was calculated as 0.951 rather 1 for An. maculipennis (Fig. 3). More appropriate niches for An. maculipennis were restricted to the western and southwestern areas (Fig. 4). Based on jackknife test, the environmental variable with the highest gain when used in isolation is temperature seasonality (Bio4), which therefore appears to have the most useful information by itself. The environmental variable that decreases the gain the most when it is omitted is NDVI, which therefore appears to have the most information that is not present in the other variables. These numbers show an acceptable validity for the exported maps.
For Cx. theileri, the area under curve was calculated as 0.873 rather 1 (Fig. 3). Based on the maps, Cx. theileri had wider and more appropriate niches across the province comparing An. Maculipennis s.l., except for the eastern area (Fig. 4). Figure 5 shows the result of the jackknife test of variable importance for Cx. theileri. The environmental variable with highest gain, when used in isolation, was mean temperature of the wettest quarter (Bio8). This variable appears to have the most useful information for modeling this species. In Fig. 5 three jackknife plots for Cx. theileri were compared. The AUC plot shows that temperature seasonality (Bio4) is the most effective single variable for predicting the distribution of this mosquito species used for testing. The relative importance of temperature seasonality also increases in the test gain plot, when compared against the training gain plot. Mean temperature of wettest quarter is helping the model to obtain a good fit to the training data, but the temperature seasonality variable gives better results on the set-aside test data.
Figure 6 shows result of the jackknife test of variable importance for An. maculipennis s.l.. The environmental variable with highest gain, when used in isolation, was temperature seasonality (Bio4). This variable appears to have the most useful information for modeling this species. Comparing the three jackknife plots can be very informative. The AUC plot shows that isothermality (Bio3) is the most effective single variable for predicting the distribution of the occurrence data that was set aside for testing when predictive performance is measured using AUC, even though it was hardly used by the model built using all variables. The relative importance of isothermality also increases in the test gain plot, when compared against the training gain plot. Temperature seasonality is helping the model to obtain a good fit to the training data, but the isothermality variable gives better results on the set-aside test data.
Discussion
In this study six Culicidae mosquito species were collected and identified. Based on the previous studies in the province, 24 mosquito species are reported as follows: Ae. vexans, An. algeriensis, An. claviger, An. dthali, An. maculipennis s.l., An. marteri, An. messeae, An. multicolor, An. sacharovi, An. superpictus, An. turkhudi, Cx. modestus, Cx. hortensis, Cx. mimeticus, Cx. perexiguus, Cx. pipiens, Cx. theileri, Cx. territans, Culiseta longiareolata, Cs. annulata, Cs. subochrea, Ochlerotatus caspius, Oc. pulcritarsus and Uranotaenia unguiculata (16, 22, 23). Our findings report no new record for the province.
The dominant species in our study was Cx. hortensis (39.72%) followed by Cx. theileri. Earlier studies in Mobarakeh County found Cx. theileri as the dominant species in both larval and adult collections (23). Studies during 2003–2005 were also introduced Cx. theileri as the dominant species in Isfahan Province (24). Although in our study, the current species had the second density, it can be due to the number of collection times. On the other hand, if field sampling is done at a better time, a greater abundance may be due to this species. Generally Cx. theileri is a rice field mosquito species (28). It has usually exophilic and exophagic behavior and has a high anthropophilic index, and comprised more than 77% of the mosquitoes catched on human bait (21). Other studies were also reported Cx. theileri as the main species in some parts of Iran (29, 30).
Culex theileri, An. maculipennis and An. superpictus as three important vectors of parasitic agents to humans were collected in this study. In northwest of Iran, Cx. theileri infected was reported to D. immitis (7). Therefore, in addition to numerous bites on human in Isfahan area, it can be considered as probable vector of dirofilariasis. Among the collected mosquitoes, two main malaria vectors of Iran were identified: An. maculipennis and An. superpictus. In this study, An. maculipennis was only found in Khomeinishahr, Golpayegan and Faridan Counties. However, this species has reported from most counties of the province (23, 24). Anopheles superpictus was collected from Khomeinishahr and Golpayegan Counties in our survey, but there are reports of this species from 12 counties of the province (23, 24). There is potential for malaria transmission in the study area. Since the province has attractions and job opportunities, there are likely infected foreign immigrants from the endemic countries visit the area, at least in some months of the year. Three other species in this survey were An. marteri, Cx. hortensis and Cs. longiareolata. These species have no tendency to feed from human. Just Cx. hortenis known as birds malaria vector under laboratory condition (31). Culiseta longiareolatsa may rarely attack human and domestic animals, although there is little information on this species.
MaxEnt model was used to predict the distribution of some Anopheles mosquitoes around the world, such as An. albimanus in Americas (32), malaria vectors of Africa, Europe and Middle East (33), and An. minimus in southeast of Asia (34). A more recent study in Iran used this model to find the best ecological niches for three main malaria vectors in south of Iran, i.e. An. stephensi, An. culicifacies s.l. and An. fluviatilis s.l. (19). It is also used to predict the potential areas for Cx. pipiens, Cx. tarsalis and Ae. vexans in the United States and Cx. tritaeniorhynchus in Saudi Arabia (35, 36). AUC value in this research was 0.951 and 0.873 for An. maculipennis and Cx. theileri, respectively. Previous studies on MaxEnt model considered predicting AUC> 0.75 as good value for suitable niche for species (37). This suggests the MaxEnt prediction in our study is well. A new survey in Iran reported AUC values of 0.943, 0.974 and 0.956 for An. stephensi, An. culicifacies s.l. and An. fluviatilis s.l., respectively (19). In other countries AUC values were reported between 0.77 and 0.99 for different Anopheles species (36, 38–40). This difference is due to various ecological needs of these species.
Conclusion
In addition to the problems caused by bites on humans, they can be considered for transmission of malaria and filariasis in the region. With due attention to tourist and business attractions of Isfahan Province, some people from different parts of the world will travel to different counties of the province annually. Considering the results of niche modeling for vector species, it is recommended to do additional studies on vectorial capacity of these species, their physiological age, and parasitic infection, and insecticide resistance susceptibility status to different insecticides to predict the risk of establishing the foci of filariasis, West Nile fever and malaria in Isfahan Province.
Acknowledgements
Collaboration of Deputy for Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences in providing facilities for this study is highly appreciated. Moreover, the authors are grateful to Mr H Davoodi, technician of Museum of Medical Entomology (TUME), School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences for his kind assistance for organizing of mounted specimens. This project is financially supported by Deputy for Research, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Project No. 26818.
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.
References
- 1.Service MW. (1993) Mosquitoes (Culicidae). In: Lane RP, Crosskey RW. Medical insects and Arachnids. Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 120–240. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Naficy K, Saidi S. (1970) Serological survey on viral antibodies in Iran. Trop Geogr Med. 22: 183–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.McIntosh BM, Russell D, dos Santos I, Gear JH. (1980) Rift Valley fever in humans in South Africa. S Afr Med J. 58(20): 803–806. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Siavashi MR, Massoud J. (1995) Human cutaneous dirofilariasis in Iran: a report of two cases. Iranian J Med Sci. 20(12): 85–86. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Maraghi S, Rahdar M, Akbari H, Radmanesh M, Saberi AA. (2006) Human dirofilariasis in Ahwaz, Iran, A report of three cases. Pak J Med Sci. 22(2): 211–213. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Azari-Hamidian S, Yaghoobi-Ershadi MR, Javadian E, Mobedi I, Abai MR. (2007) Review of dirofilariasis in Iran. J Guilan Univ Med Sci. 15(60): 102–114. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Azari-Hamidian S, Yaghoobi-Ershadi MR, Javadian E, Abai MR, Mobedi I, Linton YM, Harbach RE. (2009) Distribution and ecology of mosquitoes in a focus of dirofilariasis in northwestern Iran, with the first finding of filarial larvae in naturally infected local mosquitoes. Med Vet Entomol. 23: 111–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ashrafi K, Golchai J, Geranmayeh S. (2010) Human subcutaneous dirofilariasis due to Dirofilaria (Nochtiella) repens: clinically suspected as cutaneous fascioliasis. Iran J Public Health. 39 (1): 105–109. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Talebian A. (2010) A study of West Nile virus infection in Iranian blood donors. Arch Iran Med. 13: 1–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Fereidouni SR, Ziegler U, Linke S, Niedrig M, Modirrousta H, Hoffmann B, Groschup MH. (2011) West Nile virus monitoring in migrating and resident water birds in Iran: are common coots the main reservoirs of the virus in wetlands? Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 11(10): 1377–1381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chinikar S, Javadi A, Ataei B, Shakeri H, Moradi M, Mostafavi E, Ghiasi SM. (2012) Detection of West Nile virus genome and specific antibodies in Iranian encephalitis patients. Epidemiol Infect. 140 (8): 1525–1529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mardani M, Abbasi F, Aghahasani M, Ghavam B. (2013) First Iranian imported case of Dengue. Int J Prev Med. 4 (9): 1075–1077. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bagheri M, Dabiri F, Terenius O, Vatandoost H, Oshaghi MA, Motazakker M, Asgari S, Dabiri F, Vatandoost H, Mohammadi Bavani M, Chavshin AR. (2015) West nile virus in mosquitoes of Iranian wetlands. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 15(12): 750–754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Meshkat Z, Chinikar S, Shakeri M, Manavifar L, Moradi M, Mirshahabi H, Jalali T, Khakifirouz S, Shahhosseini N. (2015) Prevalence of West Nile virus in Mashhad, Iran: A population-based study. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 8(3): 203–205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Pampiglione S, Rivasi F. (2001) Dirofilariasis due to Dirofilaria) Nochtiella) repens: an update of world literature from 1995 to 2000. Parassitologia. 42: 231–254. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Simon F, Lopez-Belmonte J, Macros-Atxutegi C, Morchon R, Martin-Pacho JR. (2005) What is happening outside North America regarding human dirofilariasis? Vet Parasitol. 133: 181–189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zaim M, Manouchehri AV, Yaghoobi-Ershadi MR. (1985) Mosquito fauna of Iran (Diptera: Culicidae) 2- Culex. Iran J Public Health. 14(1–4): 1–12. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hanafi-Bojd AA, Azari-Hamidian S, Vatandoost H, Charrahy Z. (2011) Spatio-temporal distribution of malaria vectors (Diptera: Culicidae) across different climatic zones of Iran. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 4: 498–504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Pakdad K, Hanafi-Bojd AA, Vatandoost H, Sedaghat MM, Raeisi A, Salahi-Moghaddam A, Foroushani AR. (2017) Predicting the potential distribution of main malaria vectors Anopheles stephensi, An. culicifacies s.l. and An. fluviatilis s.l. in Iran based on maximum entropy model. Acta Trop. 169: 93–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Vatandoost H, Hanafi-Bojd AA, Raeisi A, Abai MR, Nikpour F. (2017) Ecology, monitoring and mapping of insecticide resistance of malaria vector, Anopheles culicifacies (Diptera: Culicidae) to different imagicides in Iran. Asian Pac J Trop Dis. 7(1): 53–56. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hanafi-Bojd AA, Sedaghat MM. (2017) Establishment of a databank for Iranian mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) and modeling their spatial distribution. Project No. 29953, Research Deputy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hanafi-Bojd AA, Sedaghat MM, Vatandoost H, Azari-Hamidian S, Pakdad K. (2018) Predicting environmentally suitable areas for Anopheles superpictus Grassi (s.l.), Anopheles maculipennis Meigen (sl.) and Anopheles sacharovi Favre (Diptera: Culicidae) in Iran. Parasit Vector. 11(1): 382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Moosa-Kazemi H, Zaim M, Zahraei-Ramazani AR. (2000) Fauna and ecology of Culicidae in Lenjanat area, Isfahan Province of Iran. Armaghan Danesh J. 5 (17–18): 46–54. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ladonni H, Azari-Hamidian S, Alizadeh M, Abai MR, Bakhshi H. (2015) The fauna, habitats, and affinity indices of mosquito larvae (Diptera: Culicidae) in Central Iran. North-Western J Zool. 11(1): 76–85. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Khormi HM, Kumar L. (2015) Modelling Interactions between Vector-Borne Diseases and Environment using GIS. CRC Press. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Azari-Hamidian S, Harbach RE. (2009) Keys to the adult females and fourth-instar larvae of the mosquitoes of Iran (Diptera: Culicidae). Zootaxa. 2078: 1–33. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE. (2006) Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Model. 190: 231–259. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lacey LA, Lacey CM. (1990) The medical importance of riceland mosquitoes and their control using alternatives to chemical insecticides. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. Suppl. 2: 1–93. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ghavami MB, Ladonni H. (2005) Fauna and distribution of mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in Zanjan Province, 2002–2003. J Zanjan Univ Med Sci. 53: 46–54. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Abai MR, Azari-Hamidian S, Ladonni H, Hakimi M, Mashhadi-Esmail K, Sheikhzadeh K, Kousha A, Vatandoost H. (2007) Fauna and checklist of mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) of East Azerbaijan Province, Northwestern Iran. Iran J Arthropod-Borne Dis. 1(2): 27–33. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Santiago-Alarcon D, Palinauskas V, Schaefer HM. (2012) Diptera vectors of avian Haemosporidian parasites: untangling parasite life cycles and their taxonomy. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 87: 928–964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Fuller DO, Ahumada ML, Quiñones ML, Herrera S, Beier JC. (2012) Near-present and future distribution of Anopheles albimanus in Mesoamerica and the Caribbean Basin modeled with climate and topographic data. Int J Health Geogr. 11: 13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sinka ME, Bangs MJ, Manguin S, Coetzee V, Mbogo CM, Hemingway J, Patil AP, Temperley WH, Gething PW, Kabaria CW, Okara RM, Van Boeckel T, Godfray HC, Harbach RE, Hay SI. (2010) The dominant Anopheles vectors of human malariain Africa, Europe and the Middle East: occurrence data, distribution maps and bionomic préci. Parasit Vectors. 3: 117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Foley DH, Rueda LM, Peterson AT, Wilkerson RC. (2008) Potential distribution of two species in the medically important Anopheles minimus Complex (Diptera: Culicidae). J Med Entomol. 45 (5): 852–860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Larson SR, Degroot JP, Bartholomay LC, Sugumaran R. (2010) Ecological niche modeling of potential West Nile virus vector mosquito species in Iowa. J Insect Sci. 10: 110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Al Ahmed AM, Naeem M, Kheir SM, Sallam MF. (2015) Ecological distribution modeling of two malaria mosquito vectors using geographical information system in Al-Baha Province, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Pak J Zool. 47(6): 1797–1806. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Phillips SJ, Dudík M. (2008) Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography. 31: 161–175. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ma A, Wang JF, Wang DQ, Ren ZP. (2014) Prediction of potential distribution of Anopheles sinensis in China based on MaxEnt. Chinese J Vec Biol Control. 25 (5): 393–398. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Fuller DO, Alimi T, Herrera S, Beier JC, Quiñones ML. (2016) Spatial association between malaria vector species richness and malaria in Colombia. Acta Trop. 158: 197–200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ren Z, Wang D, Ma A, Hwang J, Bennett A, Sturrock HJW, Fan J, Zhang W, Yang D, Feng X, Xia Z, Zhou XN, Wang J. (2016) Predicting malaria vector distribution under climate changes scenarios China: challenges for malaria elimination. Sci Rep. 6: 20604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]