Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2019 Dec 2;14(12):e0225739. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225739

The efficacy of conditioned medium released by tonsil-derived mesenchymal stem cells in a chronic murine colitis model

Ko Eun Lee 1, Sung-Ae Jung 1,*, Yang-Hee Joo 1, Eun Mi Song 1, Chang Mo Moon 1, Seong-Eun Kim 1, Inho Jo 2
Editor: Debabrata Banerjee3
PMCID: PMC6886802  PMID: 31790467

Abstract

Tonsil-derived mesenchymal stem cells (TMSC) have characteristics of MSC and have many advantages. In our previous studies, intraperitoneal (IP) injection of TMSC in acute and chronic colitis mouse models improved the disease activity index, colon length, and the expression levels of proinflammatory cytokines. However, TMSC were not observed to migrate to the inflammation site in the intestine. The aim of this study was to verify the therapeutic effect of conditioned medium (CM) released by TMSC (TMSC-CM) in a mouse model of dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced chronic colitis. TMSC-CM was used after seeding 5×105 cells onto a 100 mm dish and culturing for 5–7 days. TMSC-CM was concentrated (TMSC-CM-conc) by three times using a 100 kDa cut-off centrifugal filter. Seven-week-old C57BL/6 mice were randomly assigned to the following 5 groups: 1) normal, 2) colitis, 3) TMSC, 4) TMSC-CM, and 5) TMSC-CM-conc. Chronic colitis was induced by continuous oral administration of 1.5% dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) for 5 days, followed by 5 additional days of tap water feeding. This cycle was repeated two more times (total 30 days). Phosphate buffered saline (in the colitis group), TMSC, TMSC-CM, and TMSC-CM-conc were injected via IP route 4, 4, 12, and 4 times, respectively. Reduction of disease activity index, weight gain, recovery of colon length, and decreased in the expression level of the proinflammatory cytokines, interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, and IL-17 were observed at day 30 in the treatment groups, compared to control. However, histological colitis scoring and the expression level of tumor necrosis factor α and IL-10 did not differ significantly between each group. TMSC-CM showed an equivalent effect to TMSC related to the improvement of inflammation in the chronic colitis mouse model. The data obtained support the use of TMSC-CM to treat inflammatory bowel disease without any cell transplantation.

Introduction

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic gastrointestinal disease characterized by wax and wane inflammation. The prevalence of IBD is gradually increasing in Korea as well as in western countries [13]. The pathogenesis of IBD is not clearly understood. However, it is generally agreed that genetic factors, environmental factors, and immunoregulatory factors such as excessive immune reaction to the intestinal microbiome are involved [4, 5]. For the treatment of IBD, biological, anti-cytokine, and anti-adhesion molecule medications are being developed in addition to conventional therapies that include 5-aminosalicylic acid, corticosteroids, and immunomodulators. However, treatment outcome is less than ideal in 20 to 30% of patients [6, 7]. Recently stem cell therapy has been recognized as a potential new therapeutic method for such intractable diseases [8].

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) are present in various types of tissues. They are pluripotent and can differentiate to many kinds of mesodermal cells such as adipocytes, chondrocytes, and osteocytes [912]. There have been many attempts to use MSC for the treatment of many types of diseases, based on their ability to suppress immunocyte proliferation and to control inflammation, because of their secretion of various cytokines [9, 13]. A number of human and animal studies have demonstrated the anti-inflammatory effects of MSC in IBD [8, 14, 15].

Bone marrow and adipose tissues are major sources of MSC. Recently, tonsil-derived mesenchymal stem cells (TMSC) were reported to have characteristics of MSC [1618]. TMSC has several advantages compared with other MSC. They are easily acquired from resected and discarded tissues after tonsillectomy, a commonly performed surgical procedure in children, and the doubling time of TMSC is short, possibly owing to the young age of the donor. Secondly, TMSC acquired from many donors tend to unify and grow well without the domination by a certain cell line, and have pronounced differentiation capacity and immune modulatory activity [17]. In addition, the characteristics of stem cells are well conserved and are not, damaged after freezing and de-freezing. Therefore, TMSC may serve as a source for future stem cell banks and may also be easily used clinically.

In our previous studies, the intraperitoneal (IP) administration of TMSC in dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced acute and chronic colitis animal models demonstrated improvements in disease activity index (DAI), colon length, and the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines [19, 20]. To trace the localization of the TMSC in vivo, TMSC tagged with PKH26 red fluorescent cell linker were administered to normal mice and mice with acute colitis. Fluorescence microscopy examination of the colon tissues acquired after 5 days did not reveal any red TMSC-PKH26 cells [19]. Therefore, it was presumed that the TMSC did not migrate directly to the inflammation site of the intestine, with the results explained by the paracrine effect of the TMSC.

This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic effect of the conditioned medium (CM) released by TMSC (TMSC-CM) in DSS-induced chronic murine colitis models. TMSC-CM is more feasible for preparation and application than TMSC themselves. We hypothesized that TMSC-CM will exert therapeutic effects similar to those of TMSC upon IP administration.

Materials and methods

Isolation of TMSC

TMSC developed in ‘Ewha Tonsil-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell Research Center (ETSRC)’ were used. The tonsil tissue was acquired from the patients who agreed to provide resected tissues from their tonsillectomy surgeries after informed consent. The process was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital (ECT 11-53-02). The palatine tonsil tissue was acquired immediately after surgery and washed 5 times with phosphate buffered saline (PBS), followed by being minced. They were then digested for 30 min at 37°C in a Roswell Park Memorial Institute 1640 (RPMI-1640) medium (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) with 210 U/mL collagenase type 1 (Invitrogen) and 10 μg/mL DNase (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). After being passed through a cell strainer, the cells were washed twice with 20% human serum and 10% human serum in RPMI 1640 medium. Monocytes were isolated by Ficoll-Paque (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK) density gradient centrifugation. The cells were cultured in low-glucose Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Welgene, Daegu, South Korea) containing antibiotics and 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Capricorn, Ebsdorfergrund, Germany), until they attained a cell density of 5×105 cells/well, and non-adherent cells were removed after 24 h. TMSC of passage 5–7 were used for the experiment.

Preparation of TMSC conditioned medium

TMSC conditioned medium (TMSC-CM) was acquired after seeding 5×105 TMSC (in 10ml low-glucose DMEM containing 10% FBS) in a 100 mm dish, harvesting the cells for 5–7 days (total 2×106 cells), and removing the cell debris by centrifugation at 3,800 ×g for 5 min at 4°C. The medium was then collected, filtered through a 0.2 μm filter, and then stored at 4°C.

TMSC-CM was triple-concentrated (TMSC-CM-conc) using a 100 kDa cut-off centrifugal filter (Amicon Ultra, Merck Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA) at 3,800 ×g for 5 min at 4°C, and the medium that was heavier than 100 kDa was collected from the upper tube.

In vitro immunosuppression assay

Immunosuppressive effects of TMSC-CM were confirmed by splenocyte immunosuppression assay. Splenocyte isolation (1×106 cells) was performed from the spleen of a C57BL/6 mouse. Splenocytes were stimulated with the following mitogens; 5 μg/mL of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (Sigma-Aldrich) for B-cell activation, or 20 ng/mL of phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) (Sigma-Aldrich) plus 1 μg/mL of ionomycin (Sigma-Aldrich) for T-cell activation. The activated splenocytes were cultured in TMSC-CM or TMSC-CM-conc, or co-cultured with TMSC for 24 h. After 24 h, proliferation of splenocytes was measured with an ELISA reader, using the Cell Counting Kit (CCK)-8 assay kit (Dojindo Molecular Technologies, Rockville, MD, USA) at 450 nm.

Analysis of the TMSC-CM components

To identify proteins from the CM, 1 mL of the basal medium, low-glucose DMEM (10% FBS), and 1 mL of the TMSC-CM were each loaded onto cytokine and angiogenesis array membrane (R&D systems, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA). After blocking the array membrane with blocking buffer for 1 h and membrane washing, the TMSC-CM and array detection antibody cocktail was mixed and added to the blocked membrane followed by overnight shaking incubation at 4°C. After washing, streptavidin-HRP buffer was added to the membrane, and incubation was performed for 30 min. Following another washing, Chemi Reagent Mixture was added to the membrane for reaction at room temperature for 1 min and measured using LAS-300 system (Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan). Dot density was analyzed using Multi Gauge 3.0 software. Anti-inflammatory and pro-inflammatory cytokine levels were measured using cytokine array, and growth factor levels were measured using angiogenesis array.

Development of a chronic colitis mouse model

The animal models used for the experiment were seven-week-old C57BL/6 male mice (Orient Bio Co., Ltd., Sungnam, Gyeonggi, Korea) with an average weight of 20–22 g. The mice were allowed 7 days of adaptation period at the facility of the Ewha Womans University Medical Research Institute prior to the experiment. The environment was set to standardized environment for study animals. Day time and night time were provided at 12 h intervals, and temperature (23 ± 2°C) and humidity (45–55%) were set to appropriate levels. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee for Animal Research of Ewha Womans University (ESM 15–0312).

Chronic colitis was induced by oral administration of 1.5% DSS (molecular weight 36 ± 50 kDa, MP biochemical, Irvine, CA, USA) for 5 days continuously followed by an additional 5 days of tap water feeding; a total of 3 such cycles (total 30 days) was performed.

In vivo experimental design

Mice were randomly assigned into 5 groups: 1) the normal control, 2) colitis control, 3) TMSC injection, 4) TMSC-CM injection, and 5) TMSC-CM-conc injection groups.

Normal control group mice were provided with standardized water and food without any pre-treatment. In the colitis control group and three other treatment groups, chronic colitis was induced with 1.5% DSS. For the colitis control group, PBS was IP injected to match the effect of cell administration-related stress with the TMSC group. Mice in the colitis control group received four IP injections of 500 μL of PBS, those in the TMSC group received four IP injections of 1×106TMSC/500 μL. The TMSC-CM group received 12 IP injections of 500 μL of TMSC-CM (equivalent to 1×105 TMSC) in order to match the amount of TMSC with the TMSC group. As the number of injections increases, the injection-related stress of the mouse increases, therefore, the same number of injections could be used to reduce the bias. The TMSC-CM-conc group, which received four IP injection of 500 μL of TMSC-CM-conc (equivalent to 3×105 TMSC), was designed in order to match the number of injections with that of the TMSC group (Fig 1).

Fig 1. Experimental design.

Fig 1

Mice were randomly assigned into 5 groups: the normal control, colitis control, TMSC injection, TMSC-CM injection, TMSC-CM-conc injection groups. Mice in the colitis control group received 4 IP injections of PBS, those in the TMSC group received 4 IP injections of TMSC, those in the TMSC-CM group received 12 IP injections of TMSC-CM, and those in the TMSC-CM-conc group received 4 IP injections of triple-concentrated TMSC-CM. DSS, dextran sulfate sodium; PBS, phosphate buffered saline.

Assessment of the effect of TMSC and TMSC-CM

The severity of colitis in each mouse was assessed by measuring their DAI, body weight change, colon length, histologic grading, and cytokine levels. For each group, weight change, stool consistency, and occult or grossly observed blood from stool or anus were checked daily and the DAI was assessed (S1 Table) [21]. On day 31 of the experiment, mice were sacrificed with CO2 inhalation, and colon specimens were acquired from the proximal and distal parts of the dissected colon and fixed with 10% formalin, followed by paraffin sectioning and hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) staining. Two specimens from each proximal and distal colon were analyzed using a previously reported histologic colitis scoring system (S2 Table) [22].

The colon specimen was frozen to -70°C in the cryogenic freezer until analysis. One milliliter of TRIzol Reagent (Ambion, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was added to the colon specimen, and after being minced, 200 μL of chloroform (Sigma) was added, followed by vortexing. After leaving the sample at the room temperature for 2 to 3 min, it was centrifuged at 13,000 ×g (4°C) for 10 min. The supernatants were added into a new tube and the same amount of isopropanol (Sigma) was added; after mixing by inversion, the sample was left at room temperature for 5 min, and then centrifuged again at 13,000 ×g (4°C) for 10 min. The cell pellet was washed with 75% ethanol for 2–3 times and dried at room temperature. Nuclease-free water was then added, and the RNA concentration was measured with Nabi (nano-drop) (Micro Digital, Korea). Then, 2 μg of RNA and 0.5 μg of oligo dT primer were mixed, and the sample was left at 70°C for 10 min. Next, 200 units of Molony Murine Leukemia Virus Reverse Transcriptase (M-MLV RT) (Promega, Fitchburg, WI, USA), 25 units of rRNasin Ribonuclase inhibitor (Promega), 5 X RT buffer and 2 mM of dNTP were added, and the final volume was set to 25 μL by adding an appropriate amount of nuclease-free water. They were treated at 42°C for 60 min, and 95°C for 5 min, and then stored at 4°C. Quantstudio 3 real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) system (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) was used for analysis, using 0.1 μg of the synthesized cDNA as a template for the 2X Power SYBR Green PCR Master mix (Applied Biosystems) and each primer set. The primers used in this study were made by Macrogen (Korea). Pro-inflammatory cytokines, interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα), IL-17, and the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 levels were measured; each primer sequence is shown in Table 1. Each PCR was performed after 10 min of pre-denaturation at 95°C, 15 seconds at 95°C and 1 min at 60°C; this was repeated 40 times. After the PCR was complete, a melting curve was drawn to check the accuracy of gene amplification. For the internal compensation of gene expression level, the house keeping gene, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), was also used, and relative gene expression levels were presented as 2-ΔΔCt values.

Table 1. Primer sequences of the Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (real time-PCR).

Primer Sequence
IL-1β Forward 5'-GAGCCCATCCTCTGTGACTC-3'
Reverse 5'-TCCATTGAGGTGGAGAGCTT-3'
IL-6 Forward 5’-CCGGAGAGGAGACTTCACAG-3’
Reverse 5’-TCCACGATTTCCCAGAGAAC-3’
IL-17 Forward 5'-TCCCTCTGTGATCTGGGAAG-3'
Reverse 5'-CTCGACCCTGAAAGTGAAGG-3'
TNFα Forward 5’-ACGGCATGGATCTCAAAGAC-3’
Reverse 5’-AGATAGCAAATCGGCTGACG-3’
GAPDH Forward 5’-TGATGACATCAAGAAGGTGGTGAAG-3’
Reverse 5’-TCCTTGGAGGCCATGTGGGCCAT-3’

IL, interleukin; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase

Statistical analysis

For each of the analyzed parameters, values were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) test followed by post-hoc analysis using Tukey’s comparison test was used to compare the results of the control group with those of the TMSC, TMSC-CM, and TMSC-CM-conc group (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001, respectively). All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism software version 6 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA); a p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Effects of TMSC and TMSC-CM on splenocyte proliferation

The rate of proliferation of splenocytes was significantly reduced by the number of TMSC and the concentration of TMSC-CM. Splenocytes stimulated by LPS or PMA/ionomycin showed a decreased proliferation rate (fold change) when co-cultured with TMSC, and cultured in TMSC-CM; the proliferation rates were 7.30 ± 0.43, 5.77 ± 0.56, 4.88 ± 0.80, 4.28 ± 0.22, 5.56 ± 0.18, and 4.45 ± 0.87 in LPS, LPS + 5×103 TMSC, LPS + 5×104 TMSC, LPS + 5×105 TMSC, LPS + TMSC-CM, and LPS + TMSC-CM-conc, respectively (p < 0.0001, ANOVA); 6.49 ± 0.13, 4.71 ± 0.06, 4.34 ± 0.83, 4.30 ± 0.30, 2.27 ± 0.33, and 2.13 ± 0.47 (stimulated by PMA/ionomycin) (p < 0.0001, ANOVA) (Fig 2).

Fig 2. Splenocyte immunosuppression assay.

Fig 2

The splenocyte stimulated by LPS (A) or PMA/ionomycin (B) shows decreased proliferation rate when co-cultured with TMSC and cultured in TMSC-CM. Proliferation was significantly reduced by the number of TMSC and the concentration of TMSC-CM. (mean with standard deviation, *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001) LPS, lipopolysaccharide; PMA, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate.

Anti-inflammatory protein expression of TMSC-CM

Following the administration of TMSC-CM, cytokines and growth factors were highly expressed compared to the use of basal medium (Fig 3(A)). Proteins that were highly expressed following treatment with TMSC-CM included growth factors such as hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), placental growth factor (PIGF), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), tissue repair-related proteins including thrombospondin-1, urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA), and monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1, the anti-inflammatory protein transforming growth factor (TGF)-β, and the anti-apoptosis protein tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (TIMP)-1 (Fig 3(B)).

Fig 3. Cytokine and angiogenesis array.

Fig 3

(A) Basal medium and TMSC-CM are applied to each array membrane. (B) When administered with TMSC-CM, growth factors, tissue repair, anti-inflammatory, and anti-apoptosis proteins were highly expressed compared to when the basal medium was applied. (mean with standard deviation) O.D., optical density; HGF, hepatocyte growth factor; PIGF, placental growth factor; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; FGF, fibroblast growth factor; HB-EGF, heparin binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor; uPA, urokinase-type plasminogen activator; MCP, monocyte chemoattractant protein; CXCL, C-X-C Motif chemokine ligand; SDF, stromal cell-derived factor; IL, interleukin; GM-CSF, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor; TIMP, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase; IGFBP, insulin-like growth factor-binding protein.

Protective effect of TMSC and TMSC-CM on colonic inflammation in DSS mouse model

A total of 61 male mice were randomly assigned into 5 groups: normal control (n = 14), colitis control (n = 14), TMSC group (n = 9), TMSC-CM group (n = 14), and TMSC-CM-conc group (n = 10).

On day 30 of the experiment, DAI was significantly decreased in the TMSC, TMSC-CM, and TMSC-CM-conc groups compared to that in the colitis control group (4.44 ± 3.91, 1.80 ± 0.54, 1.54 ± 0.69, and 1.28 ± 0.67 in the colitis, TMSC, TMSC-CM, and TMSC-CM-conc group, respectively (p = 0.0022, ANOVA)). There were no significant differences between the DAI values for each of the treatment groups (Fig 4). The weight change (%) at day 30 for the TMSC, TMSC-CM, and TMSC-CM-conc groups was significantly increased compared to that of the colitis control group (-2.69 ± 19.79, 9.25 ± 6.53, 11.12 ± 12.12, and 13.57 ± 7.20, p = 0.0183). There were no significant differences between the weight gain (%) values for each of the treatment groups (Fig 5). The recovery of colon length (cm) observed at day 30 for the TMSC, TMSC-CM, and TMSC-CM-conc groups were significantly better than the recovery in the colitis control group (72.21 ± 6.55, 80.68 ± 5.87, 80.5 ± 7.05, and 81.8 ± 5.57, p = 0.0014). There were no significant differences between the colon length (cm) values for each of the treatment groups (Fig 6) (S3 Table). The survival rate of the colitis control group was 78.6% and 100% for the three treatment groups.

Fig 4. Disease activity index (DAI).

Fig 4

DAI was significantly decreased in TMSC, TMSC-CM, and TMSC-CM-conc group compared to the colitis control group at the 18th, 30th day of experiment. (mean with standard deviation, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001).

Fig 5. Weight recovery.

Fig 5

The weight recovery at the 18th, 30th day of experiment was significantly greater in TMSC, TMSC-CM, and TMSC-CM-conc groups compared to that in colitis control group. (mean with standard deviation, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001).

Fig 6. Colon length.

Fig 6

(A) Colon length at the 30th day of experiment was significantly increased in TMSC, TMSC-CM, and TMSC-CM-conc group compared to the colitis control group. (mean with standard deviation, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01) (B) Resected colons of each group are shown.

Histopathological alteration

Histopathologic findings of the dissected colon specimen showed infiltration of mononuclear cells and crypt damage, but no perforation. Histologic colitis scoring assessed after H&E staining did not show any significant differences between each group (p = 0.2933, ANOVA) (Fig 7, S4 Table).

Fig 7. Histopathological alteration.

Fig 7

(A) Histologic colitis scoring did not show significant difference between each of groups. (B) Histopathologic findings of distal colon of each group are shown. (Hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) stain, 100x).

Cytokine levels of colon tissues treated with TMSC or TMSC-CM

With respect to the cytokine levels of the colon tissue, the level of the IL-1β proinflammatory cytokine was significantly lower in the TMSC, TMSC-CM, and TMSC-CM-conc groups than in the colitis control group (p = 0.0188, ANOVA). The IL-6 level was significantly lower in the TMSC and TMSC-CM-conc groups (p = 0.0103, ANOVA), and the IL-17 level was significantly lower in the TMSC-CM and TMSC-CM-conc groups (p = 0.0456, ANOVA) than in the colitis control group. There were no significant differences between the cytokine levels in each of the treatment groups. There were no significant differences between the expression levels of TNFα (p = 0.1611, ANOVA) and IL-10 (p = 0.4506, ANOVA) in each group (Fig 8, S5 Table).

Fig 8. Cytokine levels of colon tissue.

Fig 8

The level of IL-1β was significantly lower in TMSC, TMSC-CM, and TMSC-CM-conc groups compared to the colitis control group. (mean with standard deviation, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01) IL, interleukin; TNF, tumor necrosis factor.

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the therapeutic effect of TMSC-CM in a chronic colitis mouse model. It is clinically meaningful that the effect of TMSC and TMSC-CM are similar, because TMSC-CM is easier to prepare and administer to patients. In addition, the amount of TMSC-CM used in this study included fewer cells compared to the TMSC group, whereas the therapeutic effects were similar, suggesting that the therapeutic effect of TMSC-CM is clinically significant.

Many previous reports have reported the therapeutic effects of MSC for colitis. When human adipose-derived MSC (ASC) were IP injected in the DSS-induced acute and chronic colitis mouse models, histopathological severity of colitis, weight loss, diarrhea, inflammation, and survival rates improved, and ASC were reported to decrease inflammatory cytokine levels and correlated with the induction of IL-10-secreting T regulatory cells [23]. Another study demonstrated that the IP injection of nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain 2 (NOD2)-activated human umbilical cord blood (UCB) MSC into DSS or trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (TNBS)-induced colitis mouse models resulted in the decreased severity of colitis and increased anti-inflammatory responses such as expression of IL-10 and T regulatory cells [15]. The IP injection of bone marrow-derived MSC (BM-MSC) into DSS-induced acute colitis models resulted in the reduction of colitis and recovery of body weight associated with TNFα-stimulated gene-6, an important immunoregulatory molecule [24]. In the present study, the TMSC injection group showed improvements in severity of colitis, weight loss, and colon length compared to the control group, and levels of proinflammatory cytokines including IL-1β and IL-6 were low, similar to the results of previous studies which assessed the effect of MSC.

The effect of MSC-CM has not been investigated thoroughly compared to the effect of the MSC injection itself. In a previous study using an acute colitis model, human BM-MSC and BM-MSC-CM were each administered by enema to TNBS-induced acute colitis guinea pig models with enteric neuropathy and motility dysfunction. Both treatment groups showed improvements in weight loss and gross morphological, and histological colon damage, with the prevention of loss of myenteric neuron and nerve process damage, compared to the colitis control group. There was no significant difference between BM-MSC- and BM-MSC-CM-treated groups [25]. In another study using human amnion-derived MSC, MSC were intravenously injected and MSC-CM was administered via enema to TNBS-induced acute colitis rat models. Both groups showed significant improvements in the endoscopic score and decreased infiltration of neutrophils, monocytes, macrophages, TNF-α, C-X-C Motif chemokine ligand 1 (CXCL1), and C-C motif chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2) [26]. In the present study, we evaluated the effect of TMSC-CM in a chronic colitis model induced by DSS, which is more similar model to human IBD, which features chronic relapsing and remitting episodes.

The similar effects of MSC and MSC-CM support the concept that MSC themselves does not migrate and act on the target, but rather that the substances that the cells secrete such as extracellular vesicles (EVs) or soluble proteins, contribute to the treatment effect. In a study in which BM-MSC were IP injected into a DSS-induced acute colitis animal model and BM-MSC were simultaneously tracked, aggregation was observed mostly with macrophages, B cells, and T cells, and were located in the peritoneal cavity, whereas fewer than 1% reached the inflamed colon [24]. MSC did not migrate directly to the colon, but decreased colitis was observed. It has also been reported that when MSC-CM is applied to hypoxic-damaged cardiomyocytes, it protects cardiomyocytes by the paracrine effect, which interferes with mitochondria-mediated apoptosis [27]. However, some studies have demonstrated that the injected MSC move directly towards the target. In a study conducted in a rat model with calvarial bone defect, fluorescent-labeled rat MSC were injected into the caudal vein and graft material made from BM-MSC-CM was applied to the lesion. The MSC gradually migrated to the defect site [28]. In an acute pancreatitis rat model, fluorescent-labeled BM-MSC were injected and it migrated to the damaged site of the pancreas [29]. Therefore, further studies are necessary to elucidate MSC migration according to the disease model.

Recently, MSC-derived EVs have been reported to be effective through cell-to-cell communication, cell signaling, and altering cell or tissue metabolism in the body [30]. In addition, several reports have suggested that EVs may be used for treatment as a substitute for cell therapy [3134]. Intramyocardial injection of EVs sourced from human BM-MSC into rats with acute myocardial infarction reduced the infarct size and improved cardiac function [35]. Intravenous (IV) injection of exosomes obtained from human UCB MSC into acute lung injury mice resulted in the suppression of hypoxic inflammation [36]. In a skin second-degree burn wound rat model, human UCB MSC exosomes were injected subcutaneously and resulted in wound healing due to increased re-epithelialization [37]. Periocular injection of MSC exosomes in an autoimmune uveitis rat model reduced infiltration in T cells and other inflammatory cells, and eventually improved uveitis [38]. In this study, because TMSC-CM were filtered using a 0.2 μm filter, only EVs with diameters less than 200 nm were extracted from the TMSC-CM. After centrifugation with a 100 kDa cut-off filter, only the upper tube substrates heavier than 100 kDa were selected, which can be converted to particles with a diameter of 10 nm or larger. Since the diameter of the exosome generally ranges from 30 to 100 nm [39], the particle size range of 10 to 200 nm in this study would have contained a slightly wider range of exosomes. Therefore, the exosomes in TMSC-CM may have induced therapeutic effects in chronic colitis, which is consistent with results of previous studies. However, in our previous attempt, the lower tube materials weighing less than 100 kDa which were produced after co-culturing with PMA/ionomycin-stimulated splenocytes also showed therapeutic effects. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct repetitive experiments using EVs in each weight range to specifically evaluate their influence.

Collectively, these results support the view that administering MSC themselves and only MSC-CM results in equivalent therapeutic effects, which may support the application of MSC-CM over cell transplantation. This application is desirable, because it would be easier to perform and would also be accompanied with fewer side effects. Additionally, MSC-CM was simpler to prepare and store than MSC during the experiment; therefore, MSC-CM would be more feasible for clinical applications. In contrast to other MSC, TMSC differentiate into the endoderm as well as the mesoderm, and are readily and inexpensively available, as they can be acquired from tonsillectomy surgeries, which are commonly performed in children. They also have shorter doubling time because of the young age of the donors. These factors may make TMSC superior to other MSC in many aspects [18]. Therefore, the development and application of a TMSC-CM-derived therapeutic agent for IBD treatment would be highly effective and clinically feasible.

There were several limitations to this study. First, TMSC and TMSC-CM were injected through the IP route. For clinical applications, the drug should be delivered either intravenously or transanally. In a previous attempt by us, TMSC administration via IV injection and transanal enema were also attempted. These were not as effective as IP injection, possibly owing to the difficulty of IV administration through the tail vein of the mouse, which creates a stressful environment for the mouse. When transanal enema was attempted, most of the liquid leaked out of the anus just after the enema, which resulted in insignificant effects. Secondly, the injected amount of TMSC or TMSC-CM for each injection was high. Generally, the appropriate injection amount for IP injection in a mouse model is 20 to 80 mL/kg [40]; in this study the average weight of the mouse was 20 to 22g. Therefore, the appropriate injection amount was 400 to 1600 μL per injection. Considering that weight loss represents the induction of chronic colitis, 500 μL was injected. However, this amount is excessive when considering human injection dosage. Therefore, it is necessary to concentrate the injectate as much as possible and reduce the amount in single doses, within the range that the solution does not solidify. Thirdly, the histological colitis scoring system was used for histologically comparing the H&E-stained specimen, which showed no significant findings. The scores obtained using the histological scoring system showed a significant difference between the treatment and colitis control groups in a previous study conducted using the acute colitis mouse model, in which colitis was induced for 7 days. However, in the current study using the chronic colitis model, in which colitis was induced for 30 days, it seems that the healing was not reflected in the scoring system because of the fibrotic change, resulting in no significant difference between the groups. Additional analysis regarding other histologic scoring systems should be performed. In addition, other staining methods such as Masson’s trichrome staining should be performed to evaluate the distribution of the collagen fibers, which is related to chronic inflammation and fibrosis.

Conclusion

TMSC-CM showed effects that were equivalent to those of TMSC on reducing inflammation in a DSS-induced chronic colitis model. Therefore, it is expected that administration of TMSC-CM, and not the TMSC themselves, may exert a therapeutic effect in IBD. Preparing and storing of TMSC-CM is clinically more feasible than compared to TMSC. Therefore, TMSC-CM could serve as a good therapeutic agent to treat IBD.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Disease Activity Index (DAI) scoring system.

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Histologic colitis scoring system.

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Disease activity index (DAI), weight change, and colon length at the 30th day of experiment.

(DOCX)

S4 Table. Histologic colitis scoring at the 30th day of experiment.

(DOCX)

S5 Table. Level of cytokine at the 30th day of experiment.

(DOCX)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the article and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (grant number, NRF 2016R1A2B4006972 and NRF 2019R1A2C1002526) to SJ.

References

  • 1.Yang SK, Yun S, Kim JH, Park JY, Kim HY, Kim YH, et al. Epidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease in the Songpa-Kangdong district, Seoul, Korea, 1986–2005: a KASID study. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2008;14(4):542–9. Epub 2007/10/18. 10.1002/ibd.20310 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Loftus EV Jr., Sandborn WJ. Epidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2002;31(1):1–20. Epub 2002/07/19. 10.1016/s0889-8553(01)00002-4 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kim HJ, Hann HJ, Hong SN, Kim KH, Ahn IM, Song JY, et al. Incidence and natural course of inflammatory bowel disease in Korea, 2006–2012: a nationwide population-based study. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2015;21(3):623–30. Epub 2015/02/04. 10.1097/MIB.0000000000000313 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Nagaishi K, Arimura Y, Fujimiya M. Stem cell therapy for inflammatory bowel disease. J Gastroenterol. 2015;50(3):280–6. Epub 2015/01/27. 10.1007/s00535-015-1040-9 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Nagahori M NY, Watanabe M. Pathogenesis of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Intest Res. 2010;8(1):9–17. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ferrante M, Vermeire S, Fidder H, Schnitzler F, Noman M, Van Assche G, et al. Long-term outcome after infliximab for refractory ulcerative colitis. J Crohns Colitis. 2008;2(3):219–25. Epub 2008/05/16. 10.1016/j.crohns.2008.03.004 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ben-Horin S, Kopylov U, Chowers Y. Optimizing anti-TNF treatments in inflammatory bowel disease. Autoimmun Rev. 2014;13(1):24–30. Epub 2013/06/25. 10.1016/j.autrev.2013.06.002 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Duran NE, Hommes DW. Stem cell-based therapies in inflammatory bowel disease: promises and pitfalls. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2016;9(4):533–47. Epub 2016/07/02. 10.1177/1756283X16642190 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chamberlain G, Fox J, Ashton B, Middleton J. Concise review: mesenchymal stem cells: their phenotype, differentiation capacity, immunological features, and potential for homing. Stem Cells. 2007;25(11):2739–49. Epub 2007/07/28. 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0197 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ding DC, Shyu WC, Lin SZ. Mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Transplant. 2011;20(1):5–14. Epub 2011/03/15. 10.3727/096368910X . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.da Silva Meirelles L, Chagastelles PC, Nardi NB. Mesenchymal stem cells reside in virtually all post-natal organs and tissues. J Cell Sci. 2006;119(Pt 11):2204–13. Epub 2006/05/11. 10.1242/jcs.02932 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Abbasi-Malati Z, Roushandeh AM, Kuwahara Y, Roudkenar MH. Mesenchymal Stem Cells on Horizon: A New Arsenal of Therapeutic Agents. Stem Cell Rev. 2018. Epub 2018/04/25. 10.1007/s12015-018-9817-x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Caplan AI. Review: mesenchymal stem cells: cell-based reconstructive therapy in orthopedics. Tissue Eng. 2005;11(7–8):1198–211. Epub 2005/09/08. 10.1089/ten.2005.11.1198 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chen QQ, Yan L, Wang CZ, Wang WH, Shi H, Su BB, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells alleviate TNBS-induced colitis by modulating inflammatory and autoimmune responses. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(29):4702–17. Epub 2013/08/08. 10.3748/wjg.v19.i29.4702 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kim HS, Shin TH, Lee BC, Yu KR, Seo Y, Lee S, et al. Human umbilical cord blood mesenchymal stem cells reduce colitis in mice by activating NOD2 signaling to COX2. Gastroenterology. 2013;145(6):1392–403 e1-8. Epub 2013/08/27. 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.08.033 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Cho KA, Kim JY, Kim HS, Ryu KH, Woo SY. Tonsil-derived mesenchymal progenitor cells acquire a follicular dendritic cell phenotype under cytokine stimulation. Cytokine. 2012;59(2):211–4. Epub 2012/05/15. 10.1016/j.cyto.2012.04.016 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Janjanin S, Djouad F, Shanti RM, Baksh D, Gollapudi K, Prgomet D, et al. Human palatine tonsil: a new potential tissue source of multipotent mesenchymal progenitor cells. Arthritis Res Ther. 2008;10(4):R83 Epub 2008/07/30. 10.1186/ar2459 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ryu KH, Cho KA, Park HS, Kim JY, Woo SY, Jo I, et al. Tonsil-derived mesenchymal stromal cells: evaluation of biologic, immunologic and genetic factors for successful banking. Cytotherapy. 2012;14(10):1193–202. Epub 2012/08/21. 10.3109/14653249.2012.706708 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Song EM, Jung SA, Lee KE, Jang JY, Lee KH, Tae CH, et al. The Therapeutic Efficacy of Tonsil-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Dextran Sulfate Sodium-induced Acute Murine Colitis Model. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2017;69(2):119–28. Epub 2017/02/28. 10.4166/kjg.2017.69.2.119 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yu Y, Song EM, Lee KE, Joo YH, Kim SE, Moon CM, et al. Therapeutic potential of tonsil-derived mesenchymal stem cells in dextran sulfate sodium-induced experimental murine colitis. PLoS One. 2017;12(8):e0183141 Epub 2017/08/31. 10.1371/journal.pone.0183141 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Stevceva L, Pavli P, Husband A, Ramsay A, Doe WF. Dextran sulphate sodium-induced colitis is ameliorated in interleukin 4 deficient mice. Genes Immun. 2001;2(6):309–16. Epub 2001/10/19. 10.1038/sj.gene.6363782 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kihara N, de la Fuente SG, Fujino K, Takahashi T, Pappas TN, Mantyh CR. Vanilloid receptor-1 containing primary sensory neurones mediate dextran sulphate sodium induced colitis in rats. Gut. 2003;52(5):713–9. Epub 2003/04/15. 10.1136/gut.52.5.713 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gonzalez MA, Gonzalez-Rey E, Rico L, Buscher D, Delgado M. Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells alleviate experimental colitis by inhibiting inflammatory and autoimmune responses. Gastroenterology. 2009;136(3):978–89. Epub 2009/01/13. 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.11.041 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sala E, Genua M, Petti L, Anselmo A, Arena V, Cibella J, et al. Mesenchymal Stem Cells Reduce Colitis in Mice via Release of TSG6, Independently of Their Localization to the Intestine. Gastroenterology. 2015;149(1):163–76 e20. Epub 2015/03/21. 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.03.013 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Robinson AM, Sakkal S, Park A, Jovanovska V, Payne N, Carbone SE, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells and conditioned medium avert enteric neuropathy and colon dysfunction in guinea pig TNBS-induced colitis. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2014;307(11):G1115–29. Epub 2014/10/11. 10.1152/ajpgi.00174.2014 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Miyamoto S, Ohnishi S, Onishi R, Tsuchiya I, Hosono H, Katsurada T, et al. Therapeutic effects of human amnion-derived mesenchymal stem cell transplantation and conditioned medium enema in rats with trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid-induced colitis. Am J Transl Res. 2017;9(3):940–52. Epub 2017/04/08. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Xiang MX, He AN, Wang JA, Gui C. Protective paracrine effect of mesenchymal stem cells on cardiomyocytes. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2009;10(8):619–24. Epub 2009/08/04. 10.1631/jzus.B0920153 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Osugi M, Katagiri W, Yoshimi R, Inukai T, Hibi H, Ueda M. Conditioned media from mesenchymal stem cells enhanced bone regeneration in rat calvarial bone defects. Tissue Eng Part A. 2012;18(13–14):1479–89. Epub 2012/03/27. 10.1089/ten.TEA.2011.0325 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gong J, Meng HB, Hua J, Song ZS, He ZG, Zhou B, et al. The SDF-1/CXCR4 axis regulates migration of transplanted bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells towards the pancreas in rats with acute pancreatitis. Mol Med Rep. 2014;9(5):1575–82. Epub 2014/03/15. 10.3892/mmr.2014.2053 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Phinney DG, Pittenger MF. Concise Review: MSC-Derived Exosomes for Cell-Free Therapy. Stem Cells. 2017;35(4):851–8. Epub 2017/03/16. 10.1002/stem.2575 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Rani S, Ryan AE, Griffin MD, Ritter T. Mesenchymal Stem Cell-derived Extracellular Vesicles: Toward Cell-free Therapeutic Applications. Mol Ther. 2015;23(5):812–23. Epub 2015/04/15. 10.1038/mt.2015.44 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Xin H, Li Y, Chopp M. Exosomes/miRNAs as mediating cell-based therapy of stroke. Front Cell Neurosci. 2014;8:377 Epub 2014/11/27. 10.3389/fncel.2014.00377 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Xin H, Li Y, Liu Z, Wang X, Shang X, Cui Y, et al. MiR-133b promotes neural plasticity and functional recovery after treatment of stroke with multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells in rats via transfer of exosome-enriched extracellular particles. Stem Cells. 2013;31(12):2737–46. Epub 2013/05/01. 10.1002/stem.1409 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Li Y, Liu Z, Xin H, Chopp M. The role of astrocytes in mediating exogenous cell-based restorative therapy for stroke. Glia. 2014;62(1):1–16. Epub 2013/11/26. 10.1002/glia.22585 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bian S, Zhang L, Duan L, Wang X, Min Y, Yu H. Extracellular vesicles derived from human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells promote angiogenesis in a rat myocardial infarction model. J Mol Med (Berl). 2014;92(4):387–97. Epub 2013/12/18. 10.1007/s00109-013-1110-5 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lee C, Mitsialis SA, Aslam M, Vitali SH, Vergadi E, Konstantinou G, et al. Exosomes mediate the cytoprotective action of mesenchymal stromal cells on hypoxia-induced pulmonary hypertension. Circulation. 2012;126(22):2601–11. Epub 2012/11/02. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.114173 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zhang B, Wang M, Gong A, Zhang X, Wu X, Zhu Y, et al. HucMSC-Exosome Mediated-Wnt4 Signaling Is Required for Cutaneous Wound Healing. Stem Cells. 2015;33(7):2158–68. Epub 2014/06/26. 10.1002/stem.1771 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Bai L, Shao H, Wang H, Zhang Z, Su C, Dong L, et al. Effects of Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes on Experimental Autoimmune Uveitis. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):4323 Epub 2017/07/01. 10.1038/s41598-017-04559-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.De Palma G, Sallustio F, Schena FP. Clinical Application of Human Urinary Extracellular Vesicles in Kidney and Urologic Diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17(7). Epub 2016/07/05. 10.3390/ijms17071043 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Diehl KH, Hull R, Morton D, Pfister R, Rabemampianina Y, Smith D, et al. A good practice guide to the administration of substances and removal of blood, including routes and volumes. J Appl Toxicol. 2001;21(1):15–23. Epub 2001/02/17. 10.1002/jat.727 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Debabrata Banerjee

7 Aug 2019

PONE-D-19-18142

The Efficacy of Conditioned Medium Released by Tonsil-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in a Chronic Murine Colitis Model

PLOS ONE

Dear Prof. Jung,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by Sep 21 2019 11:59PM. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). This letter should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Manuscript'.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Debabrata Banerjee, Ph.D

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

1.    When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

http://www.journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and http://www.journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. At this time, we request that you  please report additional details in your Methods section regarding animal care, as per our editorial guidelines: 1) please describe any steps taken to minimize animal suffering and distress, such as by administering analgesics, 2) please include the method of sacrifice and 3) Please describe the frequency of monitoring and the criteria used to assess animal health and well-being. Thank you for your attention to these requests.

3. PLOS ONE now requires that authors provide the original uncropped and unadjusted images underlying all blot or gel results reported in a submission’s figures or Supporting Information

files. This policy and the journal’s other requirements for blot/gel reporting and figure preparation are described in detail at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-blot-and-gel-reporting-requirements and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-preparing-figures-from-image-files. When you submit your revised manuscript, please ensure that your figures adhere fully to these guidelines and provide the original underlying images for all blot or gel data reported in your submission.  In your response letter, please note whether your blot/gel image data are in Supporting Information or posted at a public data repository, provide the repository URL if relevant, and provide specific details as to which raw blot/gel images, if any, are not available. Email us at plosone@plos.org if you have any questions.

4. Please ensure that you refer to Figure 7 in your text as, if accepted, production will need this reference to link the reader to the figure.

Additional Editor Comments:

This submission will be of interest to readers of PLos One if the authors revise the manuscript substantially

The reviewers all agreed that using TMSC conditioned medium was interesting and would be clinically feasible

They all however had several comments both scientific and stylistic and the authors are requested to address the comments in detail

The authors are encouraged to pay particular attention to comments from reviewer 1, 3 and 4 regarding

1. use of an arbitrary cut off of 100 kDa membrane for concentration

2. use of different amounts of animals in different experimental groups

3. follow up of mice for survival

4. explain better the lack of histological score improvement; too much emphasis is being placed on immune parameters

Comments from reviewer 4 should be addressed in detail

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: No

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The idea of using the secretome of MSCs to treat an inflammatory disease is appropriate. However, the data do not support the conclusion. It appears that the MSC treatment was more superior to than the secretome. The condition media used a cut off that could consist of secretome other than cytokines. The CM used was from naive MSCs. It is possible when these cells are in an inflammatory environment the secretome will be different.

Reviewer #2: In the manuscript entitled “The Efficacy of Conditioned Medium Released by Tonsil-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in a Chronic Murine Colitis Model” the authors describe a new approach to treat chronic colitis by means of tonsil-derived mesenchymal stem cells (TMSC) in a mouse model of chronic colitis.

The authors have shown the efficacy of tonsil-derived mesenchymal stem cells conditioned medium (TMSC-CM) in the control of this inflammatory bowel disease clinical and immunological parameters but not of the histological colitis score.

The authors underline that the preparation and storing of TMSC-CM is clinically more feasible respect to TMSC isolation and suggest that TMSC-CM therapy could serve as a pharmacological agent to treat chronic colitis.

In my opinion these data are interesting and deserve publication on PlosOne. I suggest however that the authors discuss further the lack of histological score improvement and explain better the scheme of treatments in particular the higher quantity of injections in the TMSC-CM mouse group (12 respect to 4).

Grammar and style should also be improved.

Reviewer #3: Minor English wording and syntax changes are necessary. Otherwise, it is a very good paper an provides a ready means for MSC and their products in immunotherapy

Reviewer #4: The manuscript by Ko Eun Lee, Sung-Ae Jung et al. describes the development of the approach to reduce an inflammation in the chronic colitis using a conditioning media from a human tonsil-derived mesenchymal stem cells (TMSC). Authors are already published several papers regarding the injection of TMSCs in order to treat colitis in mice models. However, they found that TMSC cells are not migrated to the inflammation site in the intestine, therefore in the current manuscript they validated the conditioned media from the TMSCs.

They found that the CM can change the disease progression like cells itself.

Authors utilized a well-established mouse model using DSS (dextran sulfate sodium) to induce the chronic and acute colitis. The assessment of the severity disease is well-established, and authors employed these parameters in they work (weight of mice, the colon length, levels of proinflammatory cytokines).

Major specific comments:

1) The rate of splenocytes was reduced (p13), but this section causes the confusion. Proliferation rates was measured in what (days)? Fig. 2 presents the folds changes. Please clarify.

2) It is understandable that the TMSC-CM causes the protective anti-inflammatory effect on the colonic inflammation. However, it is raising the question can this therapy impact on a mice immuno system causing the immunogenicity and other complications?

3) How long after this treatment mice can survive compare with the disease bearing group?

4) p.15 Fig. 4, Disease activity index (DAI) was define in the legend, please do it in the page 10, since it appears early.

5) Fig. 3 will be better if both panels are presented on the same page.

6) Fig. 4 does not have panels, but 4 graphs are presented.

7) Fig. 5 does not have panels, but 4 graphs are presented.

8) Fig. 8 legend (p16.-17), it is not quite understood where words on p. 17 belong.

9) Are the bars are presented with SD or SE.

It is a plus for the manuscript that authors define all limitations of the approach at the end of the manuscript. It is a good piece of the work which is required further validations and exploration.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

Reviewer #4: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2019 Dec 2;14(12):e0225739. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225739.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


6 Nov 2019

Reviewer #1: The idea of using the secretome of MSCs to treat an inflammatory disease is appropriate. However, the data do not support the conclusion. It appears that the MSC treatment was more superior to than the secretome. The condition media used a cut off that could consist of secretome other than cytokines. The CM used was from naive MSCs. It is possible when these cells are in an inflammatory environment the secretome will be different.

-> We thank the reviewer for their comments. The TMSC cells were cultured in low-glucose Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) containing antibiotics and 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS), until they attained a cell density of 5×105 cells/well. TMSC conditioned medium (TMSC-CM) was acquired after seeding 5×105 TMSC (in 10ml low-glucose DMEM containing 10% FBS) in a 100 mm dish and harvesting from the cells for 5–7 days (total 2×106 cells). Therefore, TMSC and TMSC-CM were both acquired from non-inflammatory environments. [Materials and Methods section; page 6-7].

The TMSC-CM group received 12 IP injections of 500 μL of TMSC-CM (equivalent to 1×105 TMSC) in order to match the amount of TMSC administered with the TMSC group. As the number of injections increases, the injection-related stress of the mouse increases. Therefore, the same number of injections was used to reduce the bias. Consequently, the triple-concentrated (using a 100 kDa cut-off centrifugal filter) TMSC-CM-conc group, which received four IP injections of 500 μL of TMSC-CM-conc (equivalent to 3×105 TMSC) was set up so that the number of injections would be equivalent to that of the TMSC group. [Materials and Methods section; page 7, 9].

In our results, DAI values, weight change, and recovery of colon length were improved in the TMSC, TMSC-CM and TMSC-CM-conc groups compared to that of the colitis control group. However, there were no significant differences between the DAI values, weight change and recovery of colon length for each of the three treatment groups. [Results section; page 15].

Reviewer #2: In the manuscript entitled “The Efficacy of Conditioned Medium Released by Tonsil-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in a Chronic Murine Colitis Model” the authors describe a new approach to treat chronic colitis by means of tonsil-derived mesenchymal stem cells (TMSC) in a mouse model of chronic colitis.

The authors have shown the efficacy of tonsil-derived mesenchymal stem cells conditioned medium (TMSC-CM) in the control of this inflammatory bowel disease clinical and immunological parameters but not of the histological colitis score.

The authors underline that the preparation and storing of TMSC-CM is clinically more feasible respect to TMSC isolation and suggest that TMSC-CM therapy could serve as a pharmacological agent to treat chronic colitis.

In my opinion these data are interesting and deserve publication on PlosOne. I suggest however that the authors discuss further the lack of histological score improvement and explain better the scheme of treatments in particular the higher quantity of injections in the TMSC-CM mouse group (12 respect to 4).

-> Thank you for your valuable comments.

1) We have now inserted the results of the histologic findings in the results section. [Results section; page 16].

“Histopathologic findings of the dissected colon specimen showed infiltration of mononuclear cells and crypt damage. Histologic colitis scoring, assessed after H&E staining, did not show any significant differences between each group (p = 0.2933, ANOVA) (Fig. 7).”

We have now discussed the reasons, as suggested, in the discussion section. [Discussion section; page 22].

“The scores obtained using the histological scoring system showed a significant difference between the treatment and colitis control groups in a previous study conducted using the acute colitis mouse model, in which colitis was induced for 7 days. However, in the current study using the chronic colitis model, in which colitis was induced for 30 days, it seems that the healing was not reflected in the scoring system because of the fibrotic change, resulting in no significant difference between the groups. Additional analysis regarding other histologic scoring systems should be performed. In addition, other staining methods such as Masson’s trichrome staining should be performed to evaluate the distribution of the collagen fibers, which is related to chronic inflammation and fibrosis.”

2) The TMSC-CM group received 12 IP injections of 500 μL of TMSC-CM (equivalent to 1×105 TMSC) in order to match the amount of TMSC administered with the TMSC group. As the number of injections increases, the injection-related stress of the mouse increases. Therefore, the same number of injections was used to reduce the bias. Consequently, the triple-concentrated (using a 100 kDa cut-off centrifugal filter) TMSC-CM-conc group, which received four IP injections of 500 μL of TMSC-CM-conc (equivalent to 3×105 TMSC) was set up so that the number of injections would be equivalent to that of the TMSC group. [Materials and Methods section; page 7, 9]. We have now modified figure 1, as requested. [Fig 1.]

Grammar and style should also be improved.

-> This work has now been further professionally edited for English content, as requested, and we attach the certificate.

Reviewer #3: Minor English wording and syntax changes are necessary. Otherwise, it is a very good paper an provides a ready means for MSC and their products in immunotherapy

-> We thank the reviewer for their comments. This work has now been further professionally edited for English content, as requested, and we attach the certificate.

Reviewer #4: The manuscript by Ko Eun Lee, Sung-Ae Jung et al. describes the development of the approach to reduce an inflammation in the chronic colitis using a conditioning media from a human tonsil-derived mesenchymal stem cells (TMSC). Authors are already published several papers regarding the injection of TMSCs in order to treat colitis in mice models. However, they found that TMSC cells are not migrated to the inflammation site in the intestine, therefore in the current manuscript they validated the conditioned media from the TMSCs.

They found that the CM can change the disease progression like cells itself.

Authors utilized a well-established mouse model using DSS (dextran sulfate sodium) to induce the chronic and acute colitis. The assessment of the severity disease is well-established, and authors employed these parameters in they work (weight of mice, the colon length, levels of proinflammatory cytokines).

Major specific comments:

1) The rate of splenocytes was reduced (p13), but this section causes the confusion. Proliferation rates was measured in what (days)? Fig. 2 presents the folds changes. Please clarify.

-> In the bar graph of Fig 2, the rate of proliferation of splenocytes stimulated by LPS only showed an increase in proliferation rate (fold change). However, when the splenocytes were co-cultured with TMSC or TMSC-CM in the presence of LPS, there was a decreased proliferation rate (fold change). [Results section; page 13].

2) It is understandable that the TMSC-CM causes the protective anti-inflammatory effect on the colonic inflammation. However, it is raising the question can this therapy impact on a mice immuno system causing the immunogenicity and other complications?

-> We thank the reviewer for their comments. When we evaluated the dissected colon specimen from sacrificed mice, they showed reduction of colon length and inflammation but no perforation. This information has now been added to the Results section. [Results section; page 16].

As this is the result of an in vitro study, it is possible that TMSC-CM may affect inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines and therefore may alter the immune system. However, further in vitro study will be needed to evaluate the immunological mechanisms. [Results section; page 13-14].

3) How long after this treatment mice can survive compare with the disease bearing group?

-> In this study, we sacrificed mice with CO2 inhalation on day 31, so we did not assess how long the treated mice could survive for. The mice that died during the 30 day experiment died because of weight loss during the second inducing period of 1.5% DSS. After that period, the mice generally survived. This information has now been added to the Materials and Methods section. [Methods section; page 10].

4) p.15 Fig. 4, Disease activity index (DAI) was define in the legend, please do it in the page 10, since it appears early.

-> “Disease activity index (DAI)” was mentioned and defined in the ‘Introduction section’ (page 5). Therefore, in accordance with the journal guidelines, further description was not needed in the Method section (page 10). [Introduction section; page 5].

5) Fig. 3 will be better if both panels are presented on the same page.

-> As suggested, panel B has now been moved to underneath panel A, in Fig. 3.

6) Fig. 4 does not have panels, but 4 graphs are presented.

-> We have now inserted the panel names of (A), (B), (C) and (D), and modified part of Fig. 4.

7) Fig. 5 does not have panels, but 4 graphs are presented.

-> We have now inserted the panel names of (A), (B), (C) and (D), and modified part of Fig. 5.

8) Fig. 8 legend (p16.-17), it is not quite understood where words on p. 17 belong.

-> We have now changed the location of the legend to Fig. 8. This is now displayed on one side of the paper.

9) Are the bars are presented with SD or SE.

-> The error bars of all graphs show standard deviation (SD), and this description has now been added to all figure legends.

It is a plus for the manuscript that authors define all limitations of the approach at the end of the manuscript. It is a good piece of the work which is required further validations and exploration.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers_final.docx

Decision Letter 1

Debabrata Banerjee

12 Nov 2019

The Efficacy of Conditioned Medium Released by Tonsil-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in a Chronic Murine Colitis Model

PONE-D-19-18142R1

Dear Dr. Jung,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it complies with all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you will receive an e-mail containing information on the amendments required prior to publication. When all required modifications have been addressed, you will receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will proceed to our production department and be scheduled for publication.

Shortly after the formal acceptance letter is sent, an invoice for payment will follow. To ensure an efficient production and billing process, please log into Editorial Manager at https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the "Update My Information" link at the top of the page, and update your user information. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, you must inform our press team as soon as possible and no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

With kind regards,

Debabrata Banerjee, Ph.D

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

The revised version of the manuscript is acceptable. It will be of interest to readers of PLOsOne

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Debabrata Banerjee

20 Nov 2019

PONE-D-19-18142R1

The Efficacy of Conditioned Medium Released by Tonsil-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in a Chronic Murine Colitis Model

Dear Dr. Jung:

I am pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper at this point, to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

For any other questions or concerns, please email plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE.

With kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Debabrata Banerjee

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table. Disease Activity Index (DAI) scoring system.

    (DOCX)

    S2 Table. Histologic colitis scoring system.

    (DOCX)

    S3 Table. Disease activity index (DAI), weight change, and colon length at the 30th day of experiment.

    (DOCX)

    S4 Table. Histologic colitis scoring at the 30th day of experiment.

    (DOCX)

    S5 Table. Level of cytokine at the 30th day of experiment.

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers_final.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the article and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES