Skip to main content
International Journal of Molecular Sciences logoLink to International Journal of Molecular Sciences
. 2019 Nov 8;20(22):5575. doi: 10.3390/ijms20225575

Identification of the Virulence Factors of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus via Heterologous Expression in Nicotiana benthamiana using Tobacco Mosaic Virus

Xiaobao Ying 1, Mengyuan Wan 2,3, Linshuang Hu 4, Jinghua Zhang 4, Hui Li 2,*, Dianqiu Lv 2,3,*
PMCID: PMC6888081  PMID: 31717281

Abstract

Huanglongbing (HLB), also known as citrus greening, is the most destructive disease of citrus worldwide. HLB is associated with the non-culturable bacterium, Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus (CaLas) in the United States. The virulence mechanism of CaLas is largely unknown, partly because of the lack of a mutant library. In this study, Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) and Nicotiana benthamiana (N. benthamiana) were used for large-scale screening of the virulence factors of CaLas. Agroinfiltration of 60 putative virulence factors in N. benthamiana led to the identification of four candidates that caused severe symptoms in N. benthamiana, such as growth inhibition and cell death. CLIBASIA_05150 and CLIBASIA_04065C (C-terminal of CLIBASIA_04065) could cause cell death in the infiltrated leaves at five days post infiltration. Two low-molecular-weight candidates, CLIBASIA_00470 and CLIBASIA_04025, could inhibit plant growth. By converting start codon to stop codon or frameshifting, the four genes lost their harmful effects to N. benthamiana. It indicated that the four virulence factors functioned at the protein level rather than at the RNA level. The subcellular localization of the four candidates was determined by confocal laser scanning microscope. CLIBASIA_05150 located in the Golgi apparatus; CLIBASIA_04065 located in the mitochondrion; CLIBASIA_00470 and CLIBASIA_04025 distributed in cells as free GFP. The host proteins interacting with the four virulence factors were identified by yeast two-hybrid. The host proteins interacting with CLIBASIA_00470 and CLIBASIA_04025 were overlapping. Based on the phenotypes, the subcellular localization and the host proteins identified by yeast two-hybrid, CLIBASIA_00470 and CLIBASIA_04025, functioned redundantly. The hypothesis of CaLas virulence was proposed. CaLas affects citrus development and suppresses citrus disease resistance, comprehensively, in a complicated manner. Ubiquitin-mediated protein degradation might play a vital role in CaLas virulence. Deep characterization of the interactions between the identified virulence factors and their prey will shed light on HLB. Eventually, it will help in developing HLB-resistant citrus and save the endangered citrus industry worldwide.

Keywords: Huanglongbing, identify virulence factors, growth inhibition, cell death, subcellular localization, protein–protein interaction, virulence mechanism

1. Introduction

Huanglongbing (HLB), also known as citrus greening, is the most destructive disease of citrus. It threatens citrus production worldwide, and all cultivated citrus species are susceptible to it [1,2]. The typical symptoms include asymmetric blotchy molting, stunting, twig dieback, smaller fruits, and uneven fruit color. The infected trees eventually die from HLB [1].

HLB is associated with a fastidious, phloem-restricted bacterium, Candidatus Liberibacter spps [3,4]. The Asian form (Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus, CaLas) is transmitted either by Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri, or by grafting. The recent research on HLB focused mainly on either the detection HLB by different methods [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17] or citrus responses to HLB at the transcriptional level, translational level, and nutritional-status level [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]. Efforts were also made to understand the virulence mechanisms of CaLas. For example, a peroxidase that degrades H2O2 [30], which is a signal in the early response of plant-to-pathogen invasion and in hypersensitive response (HR) [31], has been observed. Similarly, salicylic acid (SA) hydroxylase, which degrades SA [32], was also suggested to play a role in CaLas suppression of plant disease resistance. Recently, a virulence factor, CaLas5315, was identified as the cause of the infiltrated leaves’ death [33]. CaLas5315, also called SDE1 (Sec-delivered effector 1), inhibited the activity of citrus papain-like cysteine proteases, to suppress disease resistance [34]. Although efforts have been made to understand the pathogenesis of CaLas, how the pathogen causes symptoms in citrus is largely unknown. Since CaLas cannot be cultured in vitro, no mutant library is available to identify the virulence factors of CaLas. Similarly, due to shortcomings of transgenic and transient expression of virulence factors, viral vectors can be used efficiently to identify effectors that can affect host development negatively and/or can cause the infected cell death. Compared to the Citrus tristeza virus (CTV), which has a large genome size and is difficult to manipulate, TMV is easy to manipulate; therefore, TMV was used to screen virulence factors of CaLas in N. benthamiana in this study.

In this study, four detrimental candidates were identified. CLIBASIA_00470 and CLIBASIA_04025 inhibited plant growth and two other candidates, CLIBASIA_05150 and CLIBASIA_04065C (C-terminal part of CLIBASIA_04065), caused infiltrated leaves’ cell death at five days post infiltration (DPI). The hypothesis of the CaLas virulence was proposed and discussed based on the previous results and our findings. It will help the citrus industry fight HLB.

2. Results

2.1. Selection of the Putative Virulence Factors

CaLas is an intracellular pathogen that lacks the typical type III secretion system and type IV secretion system [35]. The effectors secrete into host cells mostly via the Sec-dependent pathway. The proteins dependent on the Sec pathway have N-terminal signal peptide (SP) sequences. Therefore, SignalP 3.0 [36], SignalP 4.0 [37], Phobius [38], and TMHMM [39] were used, together, to predict the signal peptide of the selected putative virulence factors. Transmembrane protein topology prediction and signal peptide prediction were highly similar due to hydrophobic regions present in both the transmembrane domain and signal peptide. Therefore, Phobius was used to distinguish the signal peptide and transmembrane protein [38]. The pathogen also has type I secretion system (TISS) to secret protein into host cells; therefore, hemolysin and serralysin, which are dependent on TISS, were also included in the list (Table 1).

Table 1.

The selected putative virulence factors of CaLas and the phenotypes of N. benthamiana expressing the putative virulence factors.

Locus Tag Length MW SignalP SignalP Phobius TMHMM Annotation c Phenotype d
(aa) a (kDa) b 4 3
CLIBASIA_00070 409 47.62 N Y N 1 hypothetical protein 4
CLIBASIA_00100 209 23.91 Y Y Y 0 putative ABC transporter protein 2
CLIBASIA_00420 161 17.87 Y Y Y 1 outer membrane lipoprotein 2
CLIBASIA_00460 99 11.29 Y Y Y 0 hypothetical protein 2
CLIBASIA_00470 52 5.96 N Y Y 1 hypothetical protein 1
CLIBASIA_00525 98 11.56 N Y Y 0 hypothetical protein 2
CLIBASIA_00530 98 11.38 N Y Y 0 hypothetical protein 2
CLIBASIA_00965 288 31.76 Y Y Y 1 putative membrane-bound lytic murein transglycosylase signal peptide protein 2
CLIBASIA_01135 310 35.15 Y Y N 0 substrate-binding region of ABC-type glycine betaine transport system 4
CLIBASIA_01345 666 75.38 N N N 0 Serralysin, TISS 4
CLIBASIA_01555 321 36.61 N N N 0 hemolysin protein, TISS 4
CLIBASIA_01640 142 16.08 Y Y Y 1 hypothetical protein 2
CLIBASIA_02075 397 46.04 Y Y Y 0 chemotaxis protein 4
CLIBASIA_02120 295 33.18 Y Y Y 0 periplasmic solute binding protein 2
CLIBASIA_02145 211 23.59 Y Y Y 0 hypothetical protein 2
CLIBASIA_02180 272 31.41 N N N 1 Signal peptide protein 2
CLIBASIA_02215 121 13.91 N Y Y 1 hypothetical protein 2
CLIBASIA_02250 196 22.61 Y Y N 0 extracellular solute-binding protein 2
CLIBASIA_02275 71 8.25 N N Y 1 hypothetical protein 2
CLIBASIA_02305 193 21.92 N N Y 0 hypothetical protein 2
CLIBASIA_02425 206 21.63 Y Y Y 0 outer membrane protein 2
CLIBASIA_02470 131 14.77 Y Y Y 0 hypothetical protein 2
CLIBASIA_02845 200 23.41 N Y N 0 hypothetical protein 2
CLIBASIA_02935 490 53.54 N Y N 1 serine protease DO-like protease 4
CLIBASIA_03020 295 33.45 N Y Y 1 zinc uptake ABC transporter 2
CLIBASIA_03070 474 51.84 Y Y Y 0 putative pilus assembly protein 4
CLIBASIA_03085 121 12.87 N Y N 1 hypothetical protein 2
CLIBASIA_03120 61 7.02 Y Y Y 0 hypothetical protein 2
CLIBASIA_03230 162 17.76 Y Y Y 0 hypothetical protein 2
CLIBASIA_03515 347 39.38 N N N 2 uroporphyrinogen decarboxylase 4
CLIBASIA_03695 113 12.47 N Y Y 0 hypothetical protein 2
CLIBASIA_03915 41 4.51 N Y Y 1 hypothetical protein 2
CLIBASIA_03975 208 23.67 N Y N 1 hypothetical protein 2
CLIBASIA_04025 97 11.15 N Y Y 0 hypothetical protein 1
CLIBASIA_04030 89 9.37 N Y Y 0 hypothetical protein 2
CLIBASIA_04040 160 17.3 Y Y Y 0 hypothetical protein 3
CLIBASIA_04065 409 47.32 N Y N 1 hypothetical protein C-terminal 1
CLIBASIA_04140 409 47.31 N Y N 1 hypothetical protein 4
CLIBASIA_04250 50 5.39 N Y Y 0 hypothetical protein 2
CLIBASIA_04320 216 24.74 N Y Y 0 hypothetical protein 2
CLIBASIA_04330 230 26.13 N Y Y 1 hypothetical protein 2
CLIBASIA_04405 122 13.65 N N Y 0 hypothetical protein 2
CLIBASIA_04410 123 14.34 N Y Y 0 hypothetical protein 2
CLIBASIA_04425 126 14.99 N Y Y 0 hypothetical protein 2
CLIBASIA_04470 280 30.61 N N N 8 hypothetical protein 2
CLIBASIA_04520 305 35.45 Y Y Y 0 hypothetical protein 4
CLIBASIA_04530 86 9.24 N Y Y 0 hypothetical protein 2
CLIBASIA_04540 412 47.8 N Y N 1 hypothetical protein 4
CLIBASIA_04560 195 21.77 Y Y Y 0 hypothetical protein 2
CLIBASIA_04580 117 13.35 N Y Y 0 hypothetical protein 2
CLIBASIA_04735 163 18.68 N Y Y 0 outer membrane lipoprotein omp19 2
CLIBASIA_05050 399 46.62 N N Y 1 von Willebrand factor type A 4
CLIBASIA_05060 421 48.23 N N N 1 von Willebrand factor type A 4
CLIBASIA_05115 286 21.18 Y Y Y 0 hypothetical protein 2
CLIBASIA_05150 225 24.81 Y Y Y 0 hypothetical protein 1
CLIBASIA_05320 86 9.58 Y Y Y 0 hypothetical protein 2
CLIBASIA_05330 68 7.76 N N N 0 hypothetical protein 2
CLIBASIA_05480 253 29.08 N Y N 2 hypothetical protein 2
CLIBASIA_05570 81 8.29 N Y Y 1 hypothetical protein 2
CLIBASIA_05640 69 7.67 Y Y Y 0 hypothetical protein 3

aa a: amino acid; KDa b: molecular weight in kilo Daltons. Annotation c was derived from CaLas genome sequence in NCBI. Phenotype d: 1. Show severe symptoms; 2: similar to TMV-GFP control; 3: attenuate the TMV symptoms; 4. Symptomless in systemic leaves.

2.2. Agroinfiltration of Putative Virulence Factors in N. benthamiana

The agroinfiltration of N. benthamiana was first tested by using pBI121-TMV-GFPC3 vector, which has the green fluorescent protein (GFP). The GFP signal was observed under UV light at 4 days post infiltration (DPI) in the infiltrated leaves, and virus movement was detected in systemic leaves at 10 DPI (Supplementary Figure S1). Infiltration of the 60 putative virulence factors led to several phenotypes in N. benthamiana which were classified into four groups (Table 1). Group 1 showed strong phenotypes. CLIBASIA_05150 caused the infiltrated leaves’ death at 5 DPI (days post infiltration) (Figure 1E). CLIBASIA_04065, which is above the package limitation of TMV, has ATP binding activity by prediction with PSIPRED server [40]. If we divided the protein into two parts evenly, the C-terminal part (CLIBASIA_04065C) could cause infiltrated leaves’ cell death at 5 DPI (Figure 1D). After two weeks of infiltration, the plants expressed CLIBASIA_00470, and CLIBASIA_04025 showed strong symptom of stunting (Figure 1G, H). The height of N. benthamiana expression CLIBASIA_00470 and CLIBASIA_04025 was about 66% of the height of plant expression TMV-GFPC3 at 15 DPI (Supplementary Table S2). However, the N. benthamiana leaves infiltrated with CLIBASIA_00470 and CLIBASIA_04025 were similar to those infiltrated with TMV-GFPC3 at 5 DPI (Figure 1A–C). Cell death occurred in the systemic leaves of N. benthamiana expressing CLIBASIA_04065C and CLIBASIA_05150 at 15 DPI (Figure 1I, J). Forty-two putative virulence factors belonged to group 2, which showed similar symptoms to the TMV-GFPC3 control. Group 3 had two candidates, CLIBASIA_04040 and CLIBASIA_05640, that attenuated the TMV symptoms. The last group of candidates did not show any symptom in systematic leaves. The common feature of group 4 is the large DNA size that is beyond TMV package limitation; therefore, TMV cannot move to upper systemic leaves.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

N. benthamiana expression four putative virulence factors showed strong phenotypes. By expression the total 60 selected putative virulence factors via TMV in N. benthamiana, four putative virulence factors showed strong phenotypes in N. benthamiana. The photos in the upper panel were taken at 5 days post infiltration (DPI). (A) TMV-GFPC3 was used as control, no cell death occurred in the infiltrated leaves; (B) the leaves infiltrated with CLIBASIA_00470 were similar to control; (C) leaves infiltrated with CLIBASIA_04025 resembled control TMV-GFPC3; (D) CLIBASIA_04065C caused the cell death in the infiltrated leaves; (E) expression CLIBASIA_05150 resulted in cell death in the infiltrated leaves. The photos in lower panel were taken at 15 DPI. Plants expressed CLIBASIA_00470 (G) and CLIBASIA_04025 (H) showed a stunting phonotype compared with TMV-GFPC3 (F); CLIBASIA_04065C (I) and CLIBASIA_05150 (J) caused severe symptoms in systemic leaves, including cell death.

2.3. The Four Virulence Factors Functioning at the Protein Level

To determine the four detrimental virulence factors functioning at the protein level instead of the RNA level, the mutations were introduced into the four effectors, to eliminate the functional proteins. Start codon ATG was converted into stop codon TGA for CLIBASIA_00470, CLIBASIA_04025, and CLIBASIA_05150. By mutation, the virulence factors could not translate into proteins. For CLIBASIA_04065C, the frameshifting was employed because an in-frame start codon ATG was inside of the DNA fragment. The mutated CLIBASIA_00470, CLIBASIA_04025, CLIBASIA_05150, and CLIBASIA_04065C could not inhibit plant growth nor cause cell death (Figure 2A–D). The height of N. benthamiana infiltrated the mutated CLIBASIA_00470N, and CLIBASIA_04025N was similar in height to the TMV-GFPC3-infiltrated plants (Supplementary Table S2), the height was 50% more than the plant expression in the wild type CLIBASIA_00470, CLIBASIA_04025, at 15 DPI (Figure 2E,F). No cell death was observed in the N. benthamiana infiltrated with CLIBASIA_05150N (Figure 2C). Frame-shifted CLIBASIA_04065C could not cause infiltrated leaves; death (Figure 2D). To confirm the phenotypes were caused by protein, HA-tag was fused at the N-terminal of CLIBASIA_05150, and HA-tag was added at the C-terminal of CLIBASIA_04065C. The HA fused proteins showed the same phenotypes as the wild type proteins (Figure 2C–D). The proper size of fusion proteins HA-GFP, HA-CLIBASIA_05150, and CLIBASIA_04065C-HA were detected by Western blot (Figure 2G).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The four virulence factors functioned at protein level. (A) N. benthamiana infiltrated with mutated CLIBASIA_00470 (CLIBASIA_00470 N, converted start codon ATG to stop codon TAA on right) showed normal growth compared with N. benthamiana infiltrated with CLIBASIA_00470 (on left, stunting); (B) Showed the null mutation of CLIBASIA_04025 (right) lost the function of growth inhibition compared with CLIBASIA_04025 (left). (C) Left was HA- CLIBASIA_05150, it had the same function as native protein, caused the infiltrated leaves cell death at 5 DPI; right was the null mutation, no cell death observed in the infiltrated leaves at 5 DPI. (D) Left infiltrated with CLIBASIA_04065C-HA, the cell death was observed in the infiltrated leaves at 5 DPI as wild type of CLIBASIA_04065C; right was frame shifting mutation, no cell death in the infiltrated leaves. (E) The different height of N. benthamiana infiltrated with CLIBASIA_00470 or CLIBASIA_00470N at 15 DPI. (F) The different height of N. benthamiana infiltrated with CLIBASIA_04025 or CLIBASIA_04025N at 15 DPI. (G) Western blotting detected HA-fused protein at 5 DPI. Left: infiltrated with HA-GFPC3 (28 kDa), middle infiltrated with HA-CLIBASIA_05150 (22.23 kDa), right infiltrated with CLIBASIA_04065C-HA (23.56 kDa). Lower panel was loading control.

2.4. The C-Terminal of CLIBASIA_05150 Was Critical in Causing Cell Death in the Infiltrated Leaves

To determine the functional domain of CLIBASIA_05150, series deletions were performed. First, the full-length protein was divided into three parts evenly to get three deletions: (1) deleted the N-terminal part, (2) deleted the middle part, and (3) deleted the C-terminal part. Infiltration N. benthamiana with the three constructs, respectively, only the constructs without the C-terminal part could not cause infiltrated-leaf cell death. To narrow down the functional domain of C-terminal part, the C-terminal part was divided into four parts evenly. The 3/4 length of C-terminal showed the identical function as the full-length C-terminal part (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Determination of the functional domain of CLIBASIA_05150. To determine the functional domain of CLIBASIA_05150, deletion assay was performed. Pictures were taken at 6 DPI. (A) The full length of CLIBASIA_05150 (cell death); (B) deleted 1/3 from N-terminal (cell death); (C) deleted 1/3 from middle (cell death); (D) deleted 1/3 from C-terminal (no cell death); (E) only included the C-terminal (no cell death); (F) it included N-terminal, middle part and 1/4 of C-terminal (no cell death); (G) it included N-terminal, middle part and 1/2 of C-terminal (no cell death); (H) it included N-terminal, middle part and 3/4 of C-terminal (cell death). The black spots in the infiltrated leaves indicated the cell death.

2.5. The Subcellular Localization of the Four Putative Virulence Factors

The subcellular localization of the four putative virulence factors was determined via transient expression effector-GFP fusion protein in N. benthamiana and observed under a laser scanning microscope. Post infiltration 48 h, the leaves were observed under an Olympus FV1000 MPE multiphoton laser scanning microscope. The distribution patterns of the CLIBASIA_05150-GFP and CLIBASIA_04065-GFP fusion proteins in N. benthamiana cells were different from the control, free GFP. The untagged GFP distributed in the cytosol and to the nuclear lumen, but CLIBASIA_05150-GFP fusion protein was small green dots under the confocal microscope. CLIBASIA_04065-GFP showed many green dots, green cycles, or grain-like shape (Supplementary Figure S2). To locate the specific location of the two fusion proteins, the red fluorescent protein (RPF)-targeted [41] to different organelle was co-infiltrated with the two GFP-fusion proteins, respectively. CLIBASIA_05150-GFP was overlapping with RFP-Golgi, and CLIBASIA_04065-GFP was overlapping with RFP-Mitochondrion (Figure 4). The distribution patterns of CLIBASIA_00470-GFP and CLIBASIA_04025-GFP were similar to free GFP (Supplementary Figure S2). RFP with nuclear localization signal (NLS) [42] was co-infiltrated with the two fusion proteins to determine whether they located in nuclei. The RFP-NLS was merged with CLIBASIA_00470-GFP or CLIBASIA_04025-GFP fusion proteins, and the two fusion proteins did not overlap with RFP-NLS (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Subcellular localization of CLIBASIA_05150, CLIBASIA_04065, CLIBASIA_00470, and CLIBASIA_04025. (A) Showed the subcellular location of CLIBASIA_05150. The left one showed CLIBASIA_05150-GFP fusion protein, middle showed RFP targeted to Golgi apparatus, the right one showed overlay of left and middle. (B) Showed the subcellular localization of CLIBASIA_04065. Left showed the CLIBASIA_04065-GFP fusion protein, middle was RFP targeted to mitochondria, right showed overlay of left and middle. (C,D) Showed the subcellular localization of CLIBASIA_00470 and CLIBASIA_04025, respectively. Left showed GFP fusion protein, middle showed RFP with nuclear localization signal (NLS), right showed overlay of left and middle. A and B were the same scale; C and D were the same scale.

2.6. Identification of the Host Proteins Interacting with the Virulence Factors

The autoactivations of CLIBASIA_00470 and CLIBASIA_04025 were eliminated by deletion 11 aa at N-terminal of the mature CLIBASIA_00470 and 25 aa at the C-terminal of CLIBASIA_04025. yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) was performed to identify the host proteins interacting with virulence factors. Seventeen genes (41 isolates) were identified to interact with CLIBASIA_00470. Ten genes (13 isolates) interacted with CLIBASIA_04025. The prey of CLIBASIA_05150 belonged to 6 genes (8 isolates). Only one prey was identified to interact with CLIBASIA_04065 (Table 2).

Table 2.

The identified host proteins interacting with the four virulence factors by yeast two-hybrid.

Bait Accession Number Annotation Isolate
CLIBASIA_00470 XM_006480567 polyubiquitin-like 1
XM_006480570 polyubiquitin-like 1
XM_006475150 polyubiquitin-like 1
XM_006495169 agglutinin-2-like 6
XM_006489869 galactinol--sucrose galactosyltransferase 2-like 13
XM_006466177 DnaJ homolog 1 like 7
XM_006470378 NDR1/HIN1-like protein 13 2
XM_006470373 L-ascorbate oxidase-like 1
XM_006473640 cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase 6-like 1
XM_025093156 heat shock 70 kDa protein 6 1
XM_006466284 8-hydroxygeraniol dehydrogenase-like 1
XM_006486253 phosphoinositide phospholipase C 2-like 1
XM_025092931 TSS protein 1
XM_006475911 UPF0587 protein C1orf123 1
XM_006473608 thaumatin-like protein 1b 1
XM_006469523 uncharacterized protein 1
XM_006479243 uncharacterized protein 1
CLIBASIA_04025 XM_006495169 agglutinin-2-like 4
XM_006489869 galactinol--sucrose galactosyltransferase 2-like isoform 1
XM_006465840 subtilisin-like protease-like 1
XM_006470378 NDR1/HIN1-like protein 13 1
XM_006485422 DnaJ protein homolog 1
XM_006486253 phosphoinositide phospholipase C 2-like 1
XM_006489870 probable galactinol--sucrose galactosyltransferase 2 1
XM_006486194 cytosolic endo-beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase 1-like 1
XM_006473608 thaumatin-like protein 1b 1
XM_006472735 disulfide-isomerase 1
CLIBASIA_05150 XM_006474664 cysteine protease Cp 3
XM_006471352 uncharacterized protein 1
XM_025096339 ribose-5-phosphate isomerase 3 1
XM_006441377 Kunitz trypsin inhibitor 2 1
XM_006492080 dirigent protein 16 1
XM_006485840 elongation factor 1-alpha 1
CLIBASIA_04065 orange1.1g037576m hypothetical protein 1

Among the prey of CLIBASIA_00470, three isolates were polyubiquitin-like proteins, which are the precursors of free ubiquitin [43]. Galactinol-sucrose galactosyltransferase 2-like protein that are involved in raffinose metabolism took the first place among the prey of CLIBASIA_00470 (13/41). Raffinose is the major soluble carbohydrate in roots. DnaJ like protein, a molecular chaperone of Hsp70, took the second place (7/41). Six isolates were agglutinin-2-like protein, an l-type lectin. The identical homolog of XM_006495169, agglutinin-2-like protein, in Volkamer lemon was induced by SA treatment or water deficit [44]. Two isolates were NDR1/HIN1-like protein 13, a protein confers resistance to bacterial pathogen [45]. One prey was thaumatin-like protein 1b, also known as pathogenesis-related protein 5b (PR5b), that has antifungal activity [46]. XM_006470373 encodes an l-ascorbate oxidase-like protein. Ascorbate oxidase affects plant development and interaction with microbes by regulation of the overall redox state [47]. XM_006473640 annotated as cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase 6 that catalyzes the final step specific for the production of lignin monomers and XM_006466284 annotated as 8-hydroxygeraniol dehydrogenase-like that is involved in the biosynthesis of oxogeranial from hydroxygeraniol, a precursor of the terpenoid indole alkaloids. XM_025093156 encoded a heat-shock 70 kDa protein 6. Hsp70 proteins function as the central hub of cellular network of molecular chaperones and folding catalysts. Hsp70 proteins assist the de novo folding nascent proteins and restore the conformation of non-native proteins under stress [48,49]. XM_006486253 encoded a phosphoinositide phospholipase C 2-like protein. Phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C (PI-PLC) enzymes function immediately downstream of FLAGELLIN SENSING2 (FLS2) and are crucial for plant defense response [50]. A TPR-DOMAIN SUPPRESSOR OF STIMPY (TSS) protein was encoded by XM_025092931. UPF0587 protein C1orf123 also interacted with CLIBASIA_00470. Two proteins, XM_006469523 and XM_006479243, were uncharacterized proteins. However, the ortholog of XM_006479243 from Arabidopsis annotates as a putative ubiquitin ligase.

CLIBASIA_04025 caused the same phenotype in N. benthamiana as CLIBASIA_00470. It was not surprising that the prey of CLIBASIA_04025 overlapping with the prey of CLIBASIA_00470. XM_006495169, XM_006489869, XM_006486253, and XM_006473608 interacted with the two virulence factors (Figure 5). XM_006485422 was annotated as a DnaJ protein homolog. XM_006489870 annotated as XM_006489869, galactinol-sucrose galactosyltransferase. XM_006465840 annotated as subtilisin-like protease-like protein. Subtilisin-like proteases belong to serine peptidases, mostly present in plants. Subtilisin-like proteases contribute to plant defense to pathogen not only by mounting an effective defense response but also by causing direct damage to the pathogen [51]. XM_006486194 was annotated as cytosolic endo-beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase 1-like protein. The endo-beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase genes controlled free N-glycan levels in Arabidopsis [52]. The N-glycan was associated with fruit ripening [53]. XM_006472735 annotation was disulfide-isomerase. Disulfide-isomerase (DI) is an enzyme that catalyzes disulfide formation and isomerization and function as a chaperone to inhibit aggregation [54]. DI has thiol redox activity. In response to pathogen infection, DI plays two roles: (1) the internalization of some pathogens and (2) the promotion of increased ROS in cells [55].

Figure 5.

Figure 5

The hypothesis of the virulence mechanisms of CaLas. It was reported previously that CaLas inhibited citrus disease resistance by degradation defense signals SA (salicylic acid) and H2O2 and inhibition CPs (cysteine protease). CLBASIA_05150 located in Golgi apparatus. It interacted with proteins involved in disease resistance, plant development, and protein synthesis. CLBASIA_05150 may interfere with the transportation of prey to the destination. CLBASIA_04025 and CLBASIA_00470 had the overlapping profiles of prey (indicated by the rectangular box). The identified prey included proteins involved in disease resistance, as well as plant development. CLBASIA_00470 may downregulate targets by ubiquitin-mediated protein degradation. CLIBASIA_04065 located in mitochondria. The prey may play a role in off-season flowering and programmed cell death (PCD). The solid line indicated the confirmed interaction or the known function of the protein. The dashed line indicated the speculation of interaction between proteins or the unknown function of proteins. The ‘T’ shape line indicated the inhibition function.

Three isolates of XM_006474664 interaction with CLIBASIA_05150 were cysteine protease (CP), which interacted with another effector of CaLas, SDE1 [34]. The rest of the isolates, XM_006471352, XM_025096339, XM_006441377, XM_006492080, and XM_006485840, were annotated as uncharacterized protein, ribose-5-phosphate isomerase 3, Kunitz trypsin inhibitor 2, dirigent protein 16, and elongation factor 1-alpha, respectively. Ribose-5-phosphate isomerase 3 (RPI3) catalyzes the reversible conversion of ribose-5-phosphate to ribulose 5-phosphate and plays a role in defense response to bacterium [56]. Kunitz trypsin inhibitor 1 from Arabidopsis antagonizes the cell death triggered by phytopathogens [57]. Kunitz trypsin inhibitor also functions in plant defense against insect pests [58]. Dirigent proteins are the regulator of plant growth and development, as well as a plant modulator in cell-wall metabolism during the abiotic and biotic stress function via regulation lignin and lignan biosynthesis [59]. Elongation factor 1-alpha promotes the GTP-dependent binding of aminoacyl-tRNA to the A-site of ribosomes during protein biosynthesis. It may be the rate-limiting factor for protein synthesis [60].

Only one prey interacted with CLIBASIA_04065, which was orange1.1g037576m. The Arabidopsis ortholog of orange1.1g037576m locates in the mitochondrion and affects flowering.

3. Discussion

Because HLB is a major threat to the citrus industry [1], numerous research studies have been conducted, including studies on the identification of the causal agent [3,61], the cellular structure change of the infected trees [27,62], confirmation of the causal agent from putative-infected trees [5,9,10,12,63], and detection of the putative-infected trees [6,8,13,14]. In spite of the studies that were done to understand the pathogenesis of CaLas [30,32,33,34,64] and the gene regulation of CaLas [65], the virulence mechanism is still largely unknown, because of the unavailability of the mutant library. The accessibility of genomic information of Candidatus Liberibacter [4,35,66,67] makes screening the putative virulence factors possible by expression candidates in planta. CRISPR is a powerful tool to generate canker-resistant citrus [68,69]. However, it is unable to apply CRISPR to citrus to generate HLB resistance citrus without a deep knowledge of the mechanisms of HLB development [70]. Our research on screening the virulence factors by using TMV and N. benthamiana aimed at gaining more insight into the pathogenesis of CaLas.

CaLas belongs to intracellular bacteria. The pathogen lacks a type-three secretion system [35]; therefore, the putative virulence factors mainly depend on the Sec-dependent machinery to enter host cells. A virulence factor, tengu-su inducer (TENGU) from onion yellows phytoplasma, was identified by bioinformatics prediction, followed by identification of the putative virulence factors by expression in N. benthamiana via viral vector, and confirmed with transformation Arabidopsis [71]. The virulence factor caused plant sterility by downregulating of the jasmonic acid and auxin pathways [72]. Because CaLas cannot be cultured in vitro, expression of the putative virulence factors in plant was needed to identify the virulence factors. A time- and labor-saving system was needed for large-scale screening of the putative virulence factors of CaLas. N. benthamiana was used to identify the virulence factor of CaLas that induced cell death by transient expression [33]. However, transient expression cannot identify the virulence factors that inhibit plant development. Viral vector can be used to identify the effectors that regulate plant development negatively, besides the lethal effectors. Though CTV could express GFP by agroinfiltration in N. benthamiana and inoculated citrus by stem-slash inoculation [73], the large genome size of CTV and the long amount of time needed for CTV replication in N. benthamiana and observation phenotype in citrus make CTV undesirable for large-scale screening putative virulence factors of CaLas. CaLas can multiply in tobacco (N. tabacum cv. Xanthi) and causes symptoms [74]; thus, it is possible that the virulence factors target the conserved pathway in tobacco as in citrus. Hence, N. benthamiana, a model plant for plant–pathogen interaction [75], is used to screen putative virulence factors of CaLas at a large scale, via agroinfiltration, to express effectors by TMV.

Sixty putative virulence factors were screened (Table 1). The selected 60 candidates were expressed in N. benthamiana by TMV via agroinfiltration. Based on the phenotypes of N. benthamiana expression the selected candidates, the 60 candidates were classified into four groups: (1) four candidates showed severe symptoms, in the form of growth inhibition or cell death; (2) plants expression 42 candidates were similar to the plant infiltrated with TMV-GFPC3; (3) two candidates attenuated the TMV symptom; (4) twelve candidates did not show TMV symptoms in the systemic leaves. The two low-molecular-weight proteins, CLIBASIA_00470 and CLIBASIA_04025, showed similar symptoms. N. benthamiana expressing the two candidates showed a stunting phenotype compared with TMV-GFPC3 control at 15 DPI (Figure 1 and Figure 2). It is the first report that virulence factors of CaLas inhibited plant growth. One of the symptoms for HLB-infected citrus is stunting. Ubiquitin-proteasome regulates plant development by degradation proteins [76] and functions as a signal pathway in plant immune response [77]. Pathogens encode virulence factors to disturb the plant host’s ubiquitin system as a virulence mechanism [78,79]. CLIBASIA_00470 interacted with polyubiquitin and other proteins. The ortholog of XM_006479243 in Arabidopsis (AT3G07060.1) is annotated as a ubiquitin ligase. Therefore, CLIBASIA_00470 may use the ubiquitin system to downregulate the host proteins and may subject itself to the regulation of the host ubiquitin system (Figure 5). CLIBASIA_00470 and CLIBASIA_04025 share major similarities: (1) the N. benthamiana expressed the two effectors showing the same stunting phenotype; (2) the two proteins both located in the cytoplasm; (3) the profiles of host proteins interacting with the two virulence factors were overlapping largely. Therefore, the two proteins may function redundantly. Because only part of the two virulence factors was used in Y2H, the identified prey of the two effectors cannot represent all the host proteins interacting with them. How the two effectors function in HLB development needs to be determined further.

Mitochondria play an important role in plant defense upon pathogen infection by integration and amplification of diverse signals, such as salicylic acid, nitric oxide, reactive oxygen species (ROS), or pathogen elicitors at early stages and promotion-programmed cell death (PCD) at advantage stages [80]. On the other hand, pathogens target mitochondria to cause disease development. For example, HopG1 from P. syringae pv. tomato DC3000 is a virulence factor located in mitochondria. The HopG1 transgenic Arabidopsis and Nicotiana tabacum showed a stunting phenotype. Constitutive expression of HopG1 in transgenic planta resulted in reduced respiration rates and an increased basal level of reactive oxygen species. These findings suggest that HopG1 promotes disease by disrupting mitochondria functions with specific subcellular localization [81]. The sieve element is a highly specific cell for transportation by losing important organelles, such as the nucleus, the vacuole, ribosomes, and Golgi apparatus. However, smooth endoplasmic reticulum (ER), mitochondria, sieve element plastids, and phloem proteins remain in sieve element [82]. CLIBASIA_04065 located in mitochondria (Figure 4B) and the plants expressing CLIBASIA_04065C via TMV caused the infiltrated leaves death (Figure 1D). TMV can express heterogeneous protein at a high level up to 10 percent of total soluble protein in plants [83]. The severe symptom of infiltrated leaves death may relate to the large amount of CLIBASIA_04065C. Only one gene, orange1.1g037576m, from citrus was found to interact with CLIBASIA_04065. The Arabidopsis ortholog of orange1.1g037576m is AT3G61930.1. The annotated localization is mitochondrion and expressing at the flowering stage. It is possible that the CaLas replicates to a threshold that CLIBASIA_04065 disrupts the structure and function of mitochondria, contributing to the death of the HLB-infected citrus. However, it may affect citrus flowering when at a lower concentration.

The plant Golgi apparatus is the factory of polysaccharides and glycoproteins, and it involved the transportation of proteins to their destinations [84,85]. Moreover, the Golgi apparatus plays an important role in disease resistance. For instance, Golgi phosphate transporter PHT4; 6 affected plant development and disease resistance [86]. SYP4 [87], Arabidopsis ceramidase (AtACER) [88], and CMPG1-V [89] are in the Golgi apparatus and affect plant-disease resistance. CLIBASIA_05150 located in Golgi (Figure 4B) showed the same symptom to CLIBASIA_04065C (Figure 1E). CLIBASIA_05150 interacted with three genes, XM_006474664 (NM_001288897), XM_025096339, and XM_006492080, which were related to plant-disease resistance. XM_006474664, a cysteine protease (CP), was reported to interact with SDE1, which was a conserved protein in all CaLas isolates. SDE1 suppresses citrus defense responses by inhibiting CP activities [34]. Interestingly, CLIBASIA_05150 interacted with XM_006474664 as well; therefore, XM_006474664 may play an important role in citrus resistance to HLB. Dirigent proteins are involved in lignin and lignan production [90]. Dirigent proteins participate in plant response to abiotic stress and biotic stress [59]. For instance, overexpression of a soybean dirigent (DIR) gene GmDIR22 in the susceptible soybean cultivar ‘Dongnong 50′ improved its resistance to Phytophthora sojae [91]. XM_025096339 encodes a ribose-5-phosphate isomerase 3 which is involved in the response of Arabidopsis to bacterium [56]. CLIBASIA_05150 is located in the Golgi apparatus and interacts with important proteins involved in development and disease resistance. CLIBASIA_05150 may lead to retention of the host proteins, and this contributes to HLB development.

The tolerance of citrus to CaLas relies on basal resistance [20]. Based on our data, CaLas may target different pathways for the virulence. Lignin may be an important target of CaLas. Cell-wall swell is an early sign of HLB infection [62]. Lignin is the main component of the cell wall. XM_006473640 and XM_006492080 involved in lignin synthesis interacted with two identified virulence factors. Less content of lignin in cell walls may facilitate the bacteria to move between cells, and also may contribute to cell-wall swell. Moreover, less lignin in cell walls may affect transportation and plant development. Phloem regeneration contributed to the tolerance of citrus to HLB [92]. Phloem is the battlefield of citrus and CaLas. The biggest category of proteins interacting with virulence factors was related to plant response to bacterial infection. Agglutinin-2-like protein, NDR1/HIN1-like protein 13, phosphoinositide phospholipase C 2-like protein, subtilisin-like protease-like protein, disulfide-isomerase, cysteine protease, and ribose-5-phosphate isomerase 3 are involved in disease resistance. CP is the hub of plant immunity, and the pathogen effectors target CP [93]. SC2_gp095, SahA, and SDE1 suppressed citrus resistance to HLB by the degradation of H2O2 [30] and salicylic acid [32], and by inhibiting activity of CP [34] (Figure 5). Suppression of citrus-disease resistance is an important part of CaLas virulence. Kunitz trypsin inhibitor is involved in PCD and resistance to insects. The identified Kunitz trypsin inhibitor 2 that interacted with CLIBASIA_05150 may contribute to the virulence of CaLas by the suppression of PCD or making the infected citrus favorable to psyllid.

Raffinose’s metabolism was drastically altered upon HLB infection [18]. CLIBASIA_00470 and CLIBASIA_04025 interacted with XM_006489869 and XM_006489870, the enzymes that catalyze the chemical reaction: alpha-d-galactosyl-(1→3)-1d-myo-inositol + sucrose ⇋ myo-inositol + raffinose. It is the first evidence of CaLas effectors directly related to raffinose metabolism. Since raffinose is the major soluble carbohydrate in the root, the altered raffinose metabolism may contribute to the root decline in HLB-infected citrus. The protein metabolism was altered in HLB-infected citrus. We showed that the elongation factor 1-alpha, which participates in translation, interacting with CLIBASIA_05150. Two molecular chaperones (DnaJ/Hsp70) were found to interact with virulence factors. DnaJ/Hsp genes were highly depressed in HLB-infected mandarins [94], and Hsp70 was downregulated in HLB-infected grapefruit [29]. In spite of the long-time finding of downregulation of DnaJ and Hsp70 in HLB-infected citrus, it is the first time the virulence factors of CaLas interacting with the two molecular chaperones was shown. It is possible that CLIBASIA_00470 and CLIBASIA_04025 downregulated the host proteins via ubiquitin-mediated protein degradation. Downregulation of molecular chaperone amplifies the virulence. Therefore, ubiquitin-mediated protein degradation must play a critical role in HLB symptoms’ development. Based on the previous reports and our results, a hypothesis of CaLas virulence is proposed (Figure 5). The effectors of CaLas target to different plant organelles to disturb the normal functions of cells. It was reported that CaLas inhibited citrus disease resistance. We propose that CaLas inhibits citrus disease resistance and affects citrus development intricately. The important targets of CaLas were regulated by different effectors. Ubiquitin-mediated protein degradation system may play a pivotal role in the downregulation of host proteins. CLIBASIA_00470 interacted with ubiquitin, as well as other host proteins, including a putative ubiquitin ligase. It is plausible that CLIBASIA_00470 downregulates other host proteins by ubiquitin-mediated protein degradation. CLIBASIA_00470 may downregulate genes that relate to lignin synthesis, raffinose metabolism, and defense response to bacterium and fungus. The downregulation of molecular chaperone 70 and its chaperone Hsp40/DnaJ might amplify the detrimental effects of CaLas infection, by making other host proteins unstable. Lignin contributes to plant development and response to abiotic and biotic stresses [95]. Raffinose may relate to the root decline in the HLB-infected citrus since raffinose is the major soluble carbohydrate in the root. CLIBASIA_00470, CLIBASIA_04025 and CLIBASIA_05150 interacted with multiple defense-related proteins. Among them, CP interacted with two virulence factors, SDE1 and CLIBASIA_05150. XM_006486194 interacted with CLIBASIA_04025 and may affect the citrus fruit ripening. CLIBASIA_05150 localized in Golgi. The specific subcellular localization may lead to retention of the interacting host proteins in Golgi; therefore, it disturbs the normal function of the interacting proteins. The only prey of CLIBASIA_04065 annotated as a hypothetical protein, but its ortholog in Arabidopsis affects flowering. The relationship between off-season flowering in HLB-infected citrus and orange1.1g037576m needs to be determined. Two proteins involved in cell death, Hsp70 and Kunitz trypsin inhibitor, were found to interact with virulence factors CLIBASIA_00470 and CLIBASIA_05150. It is plausible that CaLas inhibits the host defense responses and cell death for its own fitness. Characterization of the functions of the identified citrus proteins which interacted with the four virulence factors will shed light on the mechanisms of disease development. In the long run, it will help in developing HLB-resistant citrus to save the endangered citrus industry.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Material and Growth Conditions

N. benthamiana plants were grown under the controlled condition of 16 h light/8 h dark, at 25 °C.

4.2. Prediction of Signal Peptides of Putative Virulence Factors

The signal peptide of putative virulence factors was predicted by combination of SignalP 3.0 [36], SignalP 4.0 [37], Phobius [38], and TMHMM [39]. The sequences were input manually.

4.3. Construction of Plasmids

4.3.1. Construction of Plasmids for Screening Putative Virulence Factors of CaLas

TMV was used to express the putative virulence factors of CaLas in N. benthamiana. The vectors used in this study were based on pBI121 [96]. The putative virulence factors without the signal peptide were inserted between PacI and XhoI restriction enzyme sites of p30B-GFPC3 to construct an intermediate vector [83]. The 5′ UTR of TMV following cauliflower mosaic virus promoter (CaMV 35S) was amplified by two rounds of PCR. The first-round PCR was performed using primers 35S-F/35S-TMV R and TMV 5’ F/TMV 5’ R to generate DNA fragments containing 35S promoter from pBI121 and part of TMV, which is upstream of XhoI from p30B, respectively. The two DNA fragments were subsequently fused together by PCR with primers 35S-F/TMV 5′R. The DNA fragments were inserted into pGEM-T Easy (Promega, Madison, WI, USA, Cat. No. A1360). A ribozyme [97] was added at 3′ end of tobacco mild green mosaic virus (TMGMV) in p30B-GFPC3 by two rounds of PCR with primers 30B 3’-F/30B 3’-R1 and 30B 3’-F/30B 3’-R2. The fragment with ribozyme was inserted into the pGEM-T Easy vector with 35S-TMV5′ that was in positive orientation between XhoI and SacI sites. The DNA fragment was inserted into pBI121 between HindIII and SacI sites to get the intermediate vector. Later, the putative virulence factors without signal peptides were amplified from HLB-infected citrus genomic DNA and inserted into p30B-GFPC3 between PacI and XhoI sites. The plasmid containing the putative virulence factor was digested with XmaI and XhoI, and the released fragment harboring the putative virulence factor was isolated and ligated with the intermediate vector, to get the final plasmid for agroinfiltration.

4.3.2. Construction of Plasmids for Subcellular Localization

For subcellular localization of the virulence factors that showed strong symptoms in N. benthamiana, pBI121 was used. Green fluorescent protein (GFP) was used for subcellular localization assay. The virulence factors were amplified by PCR to introduce BamHI and XmaI at 5′ and 3′ ends of the amplified fragments, respectively. Similarly, XmaI and SacI sites were introduced at 5′ and 3′ of GFP fragment by PCR, and the purified DNA fragment was cloned into pGEM-T Easy vector. GFP fragment digested with XmaI and SacI was inserted into the plasmid with virulence factor that was digested with the same enzymes, to get the plasmid with virulence factor-GFP DNA fragment. The GFP-targeted virulence-factor DNA fragment was cut with BamHI and SacI, and then it was inserted into pBI121, to obtain the plasmid for subcellular localization study.

4.3.3. Construction Plasmids for Yeast Two-Hybrid Assay

Vector pGBKT7 DNA-BD (Clontech, Mountain View, CA, USA, Cat. No. 630443) was used to express the identified virulence factors for yeast two-hybrid. The virulence factors without signal peptide were inserted into pGBKT7 DNA-BD, between EcoRI and BamHI sites. All the restriction enzymes were purchased from NEB (Ipswich, MA, USA).

4.4. Agroinfiltration

The six true-leaf stage plants were used for agroinfiltration. Plasmids were introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA 105 [101] by electroporation. Agrobacterium cultures were adjusted at optical density (OD) 0.6 with solution (10 mM MgCl2, 10 mM MES pH 5.6, 10 µM acetosyringone) [98], and the first two true leaves were infiltrated with a 1 mL needleless syringe. At least three replications with 6 plants per replication were performed for each candidate gene.

4.5. Protein Extraction and Immunoblotting

N. benthamiana leaves were ground into fine powder with liquid nitrogen, for protein extraction. The extraction buffer contained 50 mM of sodium phosphate pH 7.0, 200 mM of NaCl, 10 mM of MgCl2, 10% glycerol, and one mini cocktail tablet (Roche, Basel, Switzerland)/10 mL solution [99]. Approximately 100 mg of fine powder was transferred into 100 µL extraction buffer, mixed, and centrifuged at 13,000 × g, for 30 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was used for immunoblotting. Proteins were separated on a 10% polyacrylamide gel and transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane with Trans-Blot® Turbo™ Transfer System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The membrane was stained with Ponceau S, followed by a rinsing with distilled water. The red bands on the membrane served as protein loading controls. The membrane was blocked with 4% BSA in TBS, for two hours, at room temperature, and incubated with anti-HA antibody H9658 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), overnight, at 4 °C, followed by the washing of the membrane with TBS three times (each time for 5 min). The blocked membrane was incubated with AP-labelled secondary antibody S3721 (Promega) for one hour, followed by a thorough washing. The signal was detected with Western Blue® Stabilized Substrate for Alkaline Phosphatase (Promega, Cat. No. S3841).

4.6. Determination of the Subcellular Localization of Identified Virulence Factors

The six true leaf stage N. benthamiana was used for agroinfiltration to determine the subcellular localization of the putative virulence factors which caused strong phenotypes in N. benthamiana. The infiltrated leaves were harvested at 48 h after infiltration and observed under Olympus 152 FV1000 MPE multiphoton laser scanning microscope (Tokyo, Japan). When the distribution pattern of the fusion protein in plant cells was similar to free GFP, mRFP-VirD2NLS [42] was used to co-infiltrate with the GFP fusion protein to determine whether the fusion protein was located in the nucleus. Red fluorescent protein (RFP) targeting different organelle [41] was used to co-infiltrate with GFP fusion protein when the GFP fusion protein had different distribution patterns from free GFP.

4.7. Yeast Two-Hybrid

To probe the host proteins interacting with the putative virulence factors, yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) was carried out. RNAs from HLB-infected sweet orange ‘Valencia’ leaves were used for the construction of cDNA library [66]. The library construction was performed by following the manufacturer instructions for “Mate & Plate” Library System (Clontech, Cat no. 630490) with linearized pGADT7-Rec vector and yeast strain Y187. The Y2H assay was performed according to Matchmaker™ Gold Yeast Two-Hybrid (Clontech, Cat. No. 630489). Baits were cloned into vector pGBKT7 DNA-BD between EcoRI and BamHI and transformed into yeast strain Y2H Gold. The autoactivation and toxicity of the baits were determined before screening the library. The annotations and accession numbers of positive prey were retrieved from national center for biotechnology information (NCBI, Bethesda, MD, USA). The orthologs of the prey in Arabidopsis were retrieved from the Arabidopsis information resource (TAIR) by BLASTP, with the default settings.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Talent Introduction Program of Southwest University (SWU019008).

Abbreviations

CaLas Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus
TMV tobacco mosaic virus
GFP green fluorescent protein
RFP red fluorescent protein
N. benthamiana Nicotiana benthamiana
CTV Citrus tristeza virus
Y2H yeast two-hybrid
HLB Huanglonbbing
HR hypersensitive response
PCD programmed cell death
SA salicylic acid
ROS reactive oxygen species
SP signal peptide
CP cysteine protease

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/20/22/5575/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.Y.; methodology, X.Y.; software, M.W., L.H. and J.Z.; formal analysis, M.W. and H.L.; investigation, X.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, X.Y. and D.L.; writing—review and editing, X.Y., D.L., H.L., M.W., J.Z., and L.H.; funding acquisition, D.L.

Conflicts of Interest

We declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Bové J.M. Huanglongbing: A destructive, newly-emerging, century-old disease of citrus. J. Plant Pathol. 2006;88:7–37. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gottwald T.R. Current Epidemiological Understanding of Citrus Huanglongbing. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2010;48:119–139. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-073009-114418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Garnier M., Danel N., Bove J. Aetiology of citrus greening disease. Ann. Microbiol. 1984;135:169–179. doi: 10.1016/S0769-2609(84)80075-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tyler H.L., Roesch L.F.W., Gowda S., Dawson W.O., Triplett E.W. Confirmation of the Sequence of ‘CandidatusLiberibacter asiaticus’ and Assessment of Microbial Diversity in Huanglongbing-Infected Citrus Phloem Using a Metagenomic Approach. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. MPMI. 2009;22:1624–1634. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-22-12-1624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gopal K., Sudarsan S., Gopi V., Naidu L.N., Ramaiah M., Sreenivasulu Y., Wesley E. Detection of Huanglongbing (citrus greening) disease by nucleic acid spot hybridization. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung C. 2009;64:711–716. doi: 10.1515/znc-2009-9-1017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hawkins S.A., Park B., Poole G.H., Gottwald T., Windham W.R., Lawrence K.C. Detection of citrus Huanglongbing by Fourier transform infrared-attenuated total reflection spectroscopy. Appl. Spectrosc. 2010;64:100–103. doi: 10.1366/000370210790572043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lin H., Chen C., Doddapaneni H., Duan Y., Civerolo E.L., Bai X., Zhao X. A new diagnostic system for ultra-sensitive and specific detection and quantification of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus, the bacterium associated with citrus Huanglongbing. J. Microbiol. Methods. 2010;81:17–25. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2010.01.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sankaran S., Ehsani R., Etxeberria E. Mid-infrared spectroscopy for detection of Huanglongbing (greening) in citrus leaves. Talanta. 2010;83:574–581. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2010.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Fujikawa T., Iwanami T. Sensitive and robust detection of citrus greening (huanglongbing) bacterium “Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus” by DNA amplification with new 16S rDNA-specific primers. Mol. Cell. Probes. 2012;26:194–197. doi: 10.1016/j.mcp.2012.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Fujikawa T., Miyata S.-I., Iwanami T. Convenient Detection of the Citrus Greening (Huanglongbing) Bacterium ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ by Direct PCR from the Midrib Extract. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e57011. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Nageswara-Rao M., Irey M., Garnsey S.M., Gowda S. Candidate gene markers for Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus for detecting citrus greening disease. J. Biosci. 2013;38:229–237. doi: 10.1007/s12038-013-9315-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nageswara-Rao M., Miyata S.-I., Ghosh D., Irey M., Garnsey S.M., Gowda S. Development of rapid, sensitive and non-radioactive tissue-blot diagnostic method for the detection of citrus greening. Mol. Cell. Probes. 2013;27:176–183. doi: 10.1016/j.mcp.2013.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sankaran S., Maja J.M., Buchanon S., Ehsani R. Huanglongbing (Citrus Greening) Detection Using Visible, Near Infrared and Thermal Imaging Techniques. Sensors. 2013;13:2117–2130. doi: 10.3390/s130202117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Aksenov A.A., Pasamontes A., Peirano D.J., Zhao W., Dandekar A.M., Fiehn O., Ehsani R., Davis C.E. Detection of Huanglongbing Disease Using Differential Mobility Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2014;86:2481–2488. doi: 10.1021/ac403469y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Razi M.F., Keremane M.L., Ramadugu C., Roose M., Khan I.A., Lee R.F. Detection of citrus huanglongbing-associated ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ in citrus and Diaphorina citri in Pakistan, seasonal variability, and implications for disease management. Phytopathology. 2014;104:257–268. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-08-13-0224-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Keremane M.L., Ramadugu C., Rodríguez E., Kubota R., Shibata S., Hall D.G., Roose M.L., Jenkins D., Lee R.F. A rapid field detection system for citrus huanglongbing associated ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ from the psyllid vector, Diaphorina citri Kuwayama and its implications in disease management. Crop. Prot. 2015;68:41–48. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2014.10.026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zheng Z., Xu M., Bao M., Wu F., Chen J., Deng X. Unusual Five Copies and Dual Forms of nrdB in “Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus”: Biological Implications and PCR Detection Application. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:39020. doi: 10.1038/srep39020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Martinelli F., Reagan R.L., Dolan D., Fileccia V., Dandekar A.M. Proteomic analysis highlights the role of detoxification pathways in increased tolerance to Huanglongbing disease. BMC Plant Boil. 2016;16:167. doi: 10.1186/s12870-016-0858-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Nwugo C.C., Doud M.S., Duan Y.-P., Lin H. Proteomics analysis reveals novel host molecular mechanisms associated with thermotherapy of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’-infected citrus plants. BMC Plant Boil. 2016;16:253. doi: 10.1186/s12870-016-0942-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wang Y., Zhou L., Yu X., Stover E., Luo F., Duan Y. Transcriptome Profiling of Huanglongbing (HLB) Tolerant and Susceptible Citrus Plants Reveals the Role of Basal Resistance in HLB Tolerance. Front. Plant Sci. 2016;7:291. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kim J.-S., Sagaram U.S., Burns J.K., Li J.-L., Wang N. Response of Sweet Orange (Citrus sinensis) to ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ Infection: Microscopy and Microarray Analyses. Phytopathology. 2009;99:50–57. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-99-1-0050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Matas A.J., Agustí J., Tadeo F.R., Talón M., Rose J.K.C. Tissue-specific transcriptome profiling of the citrus fruit epidermis and subepidermis using laser capture microdissection. J. Exp. Bot. 2010;61:3321–3330. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Fan J., Chen C., Yu Q., Brlansky R.H., Li Z.-G., Gmitter F.G. Comparative iTRAQ proteome and transcriptome analyses of sweet orange infected by “Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus.”. Physiol. Plant. 2011;143:235–245. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2011.01502.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Fan J., Chen C., Yu Q., Khalaf A., Achor D.S., Brlansky R.H., Moore G.A., Li Z.-G., Gmitter F.G. Comparative Transcriptional and Anatomical Analyses of Tolerant Rough Lemon and Susceptible Sweet Orange in Response to ‘CandidatusLiberibacter asiaticus’ Infection. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. MPMI. 2012;25:1396–1407. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-06-12-0150-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Liao H.-L., Burns J.K. Gene expression in Citrus sinensis fruit tissues harvested from huanglongbing-infected trees: Comparison with girdled fruit. J. Exp. Bot. 2012;63:3307–3319. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Martinelli F., Uratsu S.L., Albrecht U., Reagan R.L., Phu M.L., Britton M., Buffalo V., Fass J., Leicht E., Zhao W., et al. Transcriptome Profiling of Citrus Fruit Response to Huanglongbing Disease. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e38039. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Aritua V., Achor D., Gmitter F.G., Albrigo G., Wang N. Transcriptional and Microscopic Analyses of Citrus Stem and Root Responses to Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus Infection. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:73742. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Nwugo C.C., Duan Y., Lin H. Study on citrus response to huanglongbing highlights a down-regulation of defense-related proteins in lemon plants upon ‘Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus’ infection. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e67442. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Nwugo C.C., Lin H., Duan Y., Civerolo E.L. The effect of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ infection on the proteomic profiles and nutritional status of pre-symptomatic and symptomatic grapefruit (Citrus paradisi) plants. BMC Plant Boil. 2013;13:59. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-13-59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Jain M., Fleites L., Gabriel D.W. Prophage Encoded Peroxidase in ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ is a Secreted Effector that Suppresses Plant Defenses. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2015;28:1330–1337. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-07-15-0145-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Nanda A.K., Andrio E., Marino D., Pauly N., Dunand C. Reactive Oxygen Species during Plant-microorganism Early Interactions. J. Integr. Plant Boil. 2010;52:195–204. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2010.00933.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Li J., Pang Z., Trivedi P., Zhou X., Ying X., Jia H., Wang N. ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ Encodes a Functional Salicylic Acid (SA) Hydroxylase That Degrades SA to Suppress Plant Defenses. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2017;30:620–630. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-12-16-0257-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Pitino M., Armstrong C.M., Cano L.M., Duan Y. Transient Expression of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus Effector Induces Cell Death in Nicotiana benthamiana. Front. Plant Sci. 2016;7:982. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Clark K., Franco J.Y., Schwizer S., Pang Z., Hawara E., Liebrand T.W.H., Pagliaccia D., Zeng L., Gurung F.B., Wang P., et al. An effector from the Huanglongbing-associated pathogen targets citrus proteases. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:1718. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04140-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Duan Y., Zhou L., Hall D.G., Li W., Doddapaneni H., Lin H., Liu L., Vahling C.M., Gabriel D.W., Williams K.P., et al. Complete Genome Sequence of Citrus Huanglongbing Bacterium, ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ Obtained Through Metagenomics. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. MPMI. 2009;22:1011–1020. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-22-8-1011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Bendtsen J.D., Nielsen H., Von Heijne G., Brunak S. Improved Prediction of Signal Peptides: SignalP 3.0. J. Mol. Boil. 2004;340:783–795. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.05.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Petersen T.N., Brunak S., Von Heijne G., Nielsen H. SignalP 4.0: Discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions. Nat. Methods. 2011;8:785–786. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Käll L., Krogh A., Sonnhammer E.L. A Combined Transmembrane Topology and Signal Peptide Prediction Method. J. Mol. Boil. 2004;338:1027–1036. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.03.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Krogh A., Larsson B., Von Heijne G., Sonnhammer E.L. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden markov model: Application to complete genomes11Edited by F. Cohen. J. Mol. Boil. 2001;305:567–580. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.McGuffin L.J., Bryson K., Jones D.T. The PSIPRED protein structure prediction server. Bioinformatics. 2000;16:404–405. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/16.4.404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Nelson B.K., Cai X., Nebenführ A. A multicolored set of in vivo organelle markers for co-localization studies in Arabidopsis and other plants. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 2007;51:1126–1136. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03212.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Citovsky V., Lee L.-Y., Vyas S., Glick E., Chen M.-H., Vainstein A., Gafni Y., Gelvin S.B., Tzfira T. Subcellular Localization of Interacting Proteins by Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation in Planta. J. Mol. Boil. 2006;362:1120–1131. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.08.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Grou C.P., Pinto M.P., Mendes A.V., Domingues P., Azevedo J.E. The de novo synthesis of ubiquitin: Identification of deubiquitinases acting on ubiquitin precursors. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:12836. doi: 10.1038/srep12836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Vieira D.D., Emiliani G., Bartolini P., Podda A., Centritto M., Luro F., Del Carratore R., Morillon R., Gesteira A., Maserti B. A L-type lectin gene is involved in the response to hormonal treatment and water deficit in Volkamer lemon. J. Plant Physiol. 2017;218:94–99. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2017.07.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Xin X.-F., Nomura K., Ding X., Chen X., Wang K., Aung K., Uribe F., Rosa B., Yao J., Chen J., et al. Pseudomonas syringae Effector Avirulence Protein E Localizes to the Host Plasma Membrane and Down-Regulates the Expression of the NONRACE-SPECIFIC DISEASE RESISTANCE1/HARPIN-INDUCED1-LIKE13 Gene Required for Antibacterial Immunity in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2015;169:793–802. doi: 10.1104/pp.15.00547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Vigers A.J., Wiedemann S., Roberts W.K., Legrand M., Selitrennikoff C.P., Fritig B. Thaumatin-like pathogenesis-related proteins are antifungal. Plant Sci. 1992;83:155–161. doi: 10.1016/0168-9452(92)90074-V. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.De Tullio M.C., Guether M., Balestrini R. Ascorbate oxidase is the potential conductor of a symphony of signaling pathways. Plant Signal. Behav. 2013;8:e23213. doi: 10.4161/psb.23213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Mayer M.P., Bukau B. Hsp70 chaperones: Cellular functions and molecular mechanism. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2005;62:670–684. doi: 10.1007/s00018-004-4464-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Sung D.-Y., Sung D., Kaplan F., Guy C.L. Plant Hsp70 molecular chaperones: Protein structure, gene family, expression and function. Physiol. Plant. 2001;113:443–451. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3054.2001.1130402.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Abd-El-Haliem A.M., Joosten M.H. Plant phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C at the center of plant innate immunity. J. Integr. Plant Boil. 2017;59:164–179. doi: 10.1111/jipb.12520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Figueiredo J., Silva M.S., Figueiredo A. Subtilisin-like proteases in plant defense: The past, the present and beyond. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2018;19:1017–1028. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Fischl R.M., Stadlmann J., Grass J., Altmann F., Léonard R. The two endo-beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase genes from Arabidopsis thaliana encode cytoplasmic enzymes controlling free N-glycan levels. Plant Mol. Biol. 2011;77:275–284. doi: 10.1007/s11103-011-9808-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Meli V.S., Ghosh S., Prabha T.N., Chakraborty N., Chakraborty S., Datta A. Enhancement of fruit shelf life by suppressing N-glycan processing enzymes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107:2413–2418. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0909329107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Wilkinson B., Gilbert H.F. Protein disulfide isomerase. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2004;1699:35–44. doi: 10.1016/S1570-9639(04)00063-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Khan H.A., Mutus B. Protein disulfide isomerase a multifunctional protein with multiple physiological roles. Front. Chem. 2014;2:70. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2014.00070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Jones A.M., Thomas V., Bennett M.H., Mansfield J., Grant M. Modifications to the Arabidopsis Defense Proteome Occur Prior to Significant Transcriptional Change in Response to Inoculation with Pseudomonas syringae1. Plant Physiol. 2006;142:1603–1620. doi: 10.1104/pp.106.086231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Li J., Brader G., Palva E.T. Kunitz Trypsin Inhibitor: An Antagonist of Cell Death Triggered by Phytopathogens and Fumonisin B1 in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant. 2008;1:482–495. doi: 10.1093/mp/ssn013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Bendre A.D., Ramasamy S., Suresh C. Analysis of Kunitz inhibitors from plants for comprehensive structural and functional insights. Int. J. Boil. Macromol. 2018;113:933–943. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.02.148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Paniagua C., Bilkova A., Dabravolski S., Riber W., Didi V., Gigli-Bisceglia N., Hamann T., Jackson P., Houser J., Wimmerova M., et al. Dirigent proteins in plants: Modulating cell wall metabolism during abiotic and biotic stress exposure. J. Exp. Bot. 2017;68:3287–3301. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erx141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Ursin V.M., Irvine J.M., Hiatt W.R., Shewmaker C.K. Developmental analysis of elongation factor-1 alpha expression in transgenic tobacco. Plant Cell. 1991;3:583–591. doi: 10.1105/tpc.3.6.583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Jagoueix S., Bove J.M., Garnier M. The phloem-limited bacterium of greening disease of citrus is a member of the alpha subdivision of the Proteobacteria. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1994;44:379–386. doi: 10.1099/00207713-44-3-379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Folimonova S.Y., Achor D.S. Early Events of Citrus Greening (Huanglongbing) Disease Development at the Ultrastructural Level. Phytopathology. 2010;100:949–958. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-100-9-0949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Li W., Hartung J.S., Levy L. Quantitative real-time PCR for detection and identification of Candidatus Liberibacter species associated with citrus huanglongbing. J. Microbiol. Methods. 2006;66:104–115. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2005.10.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Liu X., Fan Y., Zhang C., Dai M., Wang X., Li W. Nuclear Import of a Secreted "Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus" Protein is Temperature Dependent and Contributes to Pathogenicity in Nicotiana benthamiana. Front. Microbiol. 2019;10:1684. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Pagliai F.A., Coyle J.F., Kapoor S., Gonzalez C.F., Lorca G.L. LdtR is a master regulator of gene expression inLiberibacter asiaticus. Microb. Biotechnol. 2017;10:896–909. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.12728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Yan Q., Sreedharan A., Wei S., Wang J., Folimonova S., Wang N., Pelz-Stelinski K., Pelz-Stelinski K. Global gene expression changes in Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus during the transmission in distinct hosts between plant and insect. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2013;14:391–404. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Wulff N.A., Zhang S., Setubal J.C., Almeida N.F., Martins E.C., Harakava R., Kumar D., Rangel L.T., Foissac X., Bové J.M., et al. The Complete Genome Sequence of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter americanus’, Associated with Citrus Huanglongbing. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. MPMI. 2014;27:163–176. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-09-13-0292-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Peng A., Chen S., Lei T., Xu L., He Y., Wu L., Yao L., Zou X. Engineering canker-resistant plants through CRISPR/Cas9-targeted editing of the susceptibility geneCsLOB1promoter in citrus. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2017;15:1509–1519. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Jia H., Zhang Y., Orbović V., Xu J., White F.F., Jones J.B., Wang N. Genome editing of the disease susceptibility gene CsLOB1 in citrus confers resistance to citrus canker. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2017;15:817–823. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Song X., Bhattarai K., Lv D., Gao F., Ying X. Can CRISPR Win the Battle against Huanglongbing? J. Plant Pathol. Microbiol. 2017;8:2. [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Hoshi A., Oshima K., Kakizawa S., Ishii Y., Ozeki J., Hashimoto M., Komatsu K., Kagiwada S., Yamaji Y., Namba S. A unique virulence factor for proliferation and dwarfism in plants identified from a phytopathogenic bacterium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106:6416–6421. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0813038106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Minato N., Himeno M., Hoshi A., Maejima K., Komatsu K., Takebayashi Y., Kasahara H., Yusa A., Yamaji Y., Oshima K., et al. The phytoplasmal virulence factor TENGU causes plant sterility by downregulating of the jasmonic acid and auxin pathways. Sci. Rep. 2014;4:7399. doi: 10.1038/srep07399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Ambrós S., El-Mohtar C., Ruiz-Ruiz S., Peña L., Guerri J., Dawson W.O., Moreno P. Agroinoculation of Citrus tristeza virus Causes Systemic Infection and Symptoms in the Presumed Nonhost Nicotiana benthamiana. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. MPMI. 2011;24:1119–1131. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-05-11-0110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Francischini F.J.B., Oliveira K.D.S., Astúa-Monge G., Novelli A., Lorenzino R., Matiolli C., Kemper E., Da Silva A.C.R., Kitajima E.W. First Report on the Transmission of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter americanus’ from Citrus to Nicotiana tabacum cv. Xanthi. Plant Dis. 2007;91:631. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-91-5-0631B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Goodin M.M., Zaitlin D., Naidu R.A., Lommel S.A. Nicotiana benthamiana: Its History and Future as a Model for Plant–Pathogen Interactions. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2008;21:1015–1026. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-21-8-1015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Hellmann H., Estelle M. Plant Development: Regulation by Protein Degradation. Science. 2002;297:793–797. doi: 10.1126/science.1072831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Marino D., Peeters N., Rivas S. Ubiquitination during Plant Immune Signaling1. Plant Physiol. 2012;160:15–27. doi: 10.1104/pp.112.199281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Dudler R. Manipulation of Host Proteasomes as a Virulence Mechanism of Plant Pathogens. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2013;51:521–542. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-082712-102312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Banfield M.J. Corrigendum: Perturbation of host ubiquitin systems by plant pathogen/pest effector proteins. Cell. Microbiol. 2015;17:765. doi: 10.1111/cmi.12427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Colombatti F., Gonzalez D.H., Welchen E. Plant mitochondria under pathogen attack: A sigh of relief or a last breath? Mitochondrion. 2014;19:238–244. doi: 10.1016/j.mito.2014.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Block A., Guo M., Li G., Elowsky C., Clemente T.E., Alfano J.R. The Pseudomonas syringae type III effector HopG1 targets mitochondria, alters plant development and suppresses plant innate immunity. Cell. Microbiol. 2010;12:318–330. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2009.01396.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Froelich D.R., Mullendore D.L., Jensen K.H., Ross-Elliott T.J., Anstead J.A., Thompson G.A., Pélissier H.C., Knoblauch M. Phloem Ultrastructure and Pressure Flow: Sieve-Element-Occlusion-Related Agglomerations Do Not Affect Translocation. Plant Cell. 2011;23:4428–4445. doi: 10.1105/tpc.111.093179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Shivprasad S., Pogue G.P., Lewandowski D.J., Hidalgo J., Donson J., Grill L.K., Dawson W.O. Heterologous Sequences Greatly Affect Foreign Gene Expression in Tobacco Mosaic Virus-Based Vectors. Virology. 1999;255:312–323. doi: 10.1006/viro.1998.9579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Dupree P., Sherrier D.J. The plant Golgi apparatus. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1998;1404:259–270. doi: 10.1016/S0167-4889(98)00061-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Driouich A., Faye L., Staehelin A. The plant Golgi apparatus: A factory for complex polysaccharides and glycoproteins. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1993;18:210–214. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(93)90191-O. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Hassler S., Lemke L., Jung B., Möhlmann T., Krüger F., Schumacher K., Espen L., Martinoia E., Neuhaus H.E. Lack of the Golgi phosphate transporter PHT4;6 causes strong developmental defects, constitutively activated disease resistance mechanisms and altered intracellular phosphate compartmentation in Arabidopsis. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 2012;72:732–744. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2012.05106.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Uemura T., Kim H., Saito C., Ebine K., Ueda T., Schulze-Lefert P., Nakano A. Qa-SNAREs localized to the trans-Golgi network regulate multiple transport pathways and extracellular disease resistance in plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2012;109:1784–1789. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1115146109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Wu J.-X., Li J., Liu Z., Yin J., Chang Z.-Y., Rong C., Wu J.-L., Bi F.-C., Yao N. The Arabidopsis ceramidaseAtACER functions in disease resistance and salt tolerance. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 2015;81:767–780. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Zhu Y., Li Y., Fei F., Wang Z., Wang W., Cao A., Liu Y., Han S., Xing L., Wang H., et al. E3 ubiquitin ligase gene CMPG1-V from Haynaldia villosa L. contributes to powdery mildew resistance in common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 2015;84:154–168. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12966. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Davin L.B. Dirigent Proteins and Dirigent Sites Explain the Mystery of Specificity of Radical Precursor Coupling in Lignan and Lignin Biosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 2000;123:453–462. doi: 10.1104/pp.123.2.453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Li N., Zhao M., Liu T., Dong L., Cheng Q., Wu J., Wang L., Chen X., Zhang C., Lu W., et al. A Novel Soybean Dirigent Gene GmDIR22 Contributes to Promotion of Lignan Biosynthesis and Enhances Resistance to Phytophthora sojae. Front. Plant Sci. 2017;8:1185. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Deng H., Achor D.S., Etxeberria E., Yu Q., Du D., Stanton D., Liang G., Gmitter F.G. Phloem Regeneration Is a Mechanism for Huanglongbing-Tolerance of “Bearss” Lemon and “LB8-9” Sugar Belle (R) Mandarin. Front. Plant Sci. 2019;10:277. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Misas-Villamil J.C., Van Der Hoorn R.A.L., Doehlemann G. Papain-like cysteine proteases as hubs in plant immunity. New Phytol. 2016;212:902–907. doi: 10.1111/nph.14117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Xu M., Li Y., Zheng Z., Dai Z., Tao Y., Deng X. Transcriptional Analyses of Mandarins Seriously Infected by ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0133652. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Liu Q., Luo L., Zheng L. Lignins: Biosynthesis and Biological Functions in Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018;19:335. doi: 10.3390/ijms19020335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Chen P.-Y., Wang C.-K., Soong S.-C., To K.-Y. Complete sequence of the binary vector pBI121 and its application in cloning T-DNA insertion from transgenic plants. Mol. Breed. 2003;11:287–293. doi: 10.1023/A:1023475710642. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Turpen T.H., Turpen A.M., Weinzettl N., Kumagai M.H., Dawson W.O. Transfection of whole plants from wounds inoculated with Agrobacterium tumefaciens containing cDNA of tobacco mosaic virus. J. Virol. Methods. 1993;42:227–239. doi: 10.1016/0166-0934(93)90035-P. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Hood E.E., Gelvin S.B., Melchers L.S., Hoekema A. NewAgrobacterium helper plasmids for gene transfer to plants. Transgenic Res. 1993;2:208–218. doi: 10.1007/BF01977351. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Ying X.-B., Dong L., Zhu H., Duan C.-G., Du Q.-S., Lv D.-Q., Fang Y.-Y., Garcia J.A., Fang R.-X., Guo H.-S. RNA-Dependent RNA Polymerase 1 from Nicotiana tabacum Suppresses RNA Silencing and Enhances Viral Infection in Nicotiana benthamiana. Plant Cell. 2010;22:1358–1372. doi: 10.1105/tpc.109.072058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from International Journal of Molecular Sciences are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES