Skip to main content
British Journal of Cancer logoLink to British Journal of Cancer
. 2019 Nov 1;121(11):904–911. doi: 10.1038/s41416-019-0612-5

Treatment patterns and survival in HER2-positive early breast cancer: a whole-of-population Australian cohort study (2007–2016)

Monica Tang 1,, Andrea Schaffer 1, Belinda E Kiely 2, Benjamin Daniels 1, Robert J Simes 2, Chee K Lee 2, Sallie-Anne Pearson 1
PMCID: PMC6889396  PMID: 31673103

Abstract

Background

Randomised clinical trials (RCTs) demonstrate that trastuzumab improves survival in patients with human epidermal growth factor 2-positive early breast cancer (HER2 + EBC), but real-world patients and clinical practice often differ from RCTs. We examine real-world treatment patterns and outcomes associated with trastuzumab for HER2 + EBC.

Methods

We identified all Australians dispensed trastuzumab for HER2 + EBC between 1/1/2007 and 30/6/2016. We estimated the proportion of patients completing 12 months of treatment (defined as ≥350 days of exposure within 540 days of initiation). We estimated overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) by using trastuzumab dispensing for metastatic breast cancer as a surrogate for recurrence.

Results

Our study included 14,644 patients. Among patients with ≥540 days of follow-up (n = 11,903), 67.4% completed 12 months of trastuzumab. OS rates at 5 and 9 years were 92.7 and 87.9%, and RFS rates at 5 and 9 years were 86.8 and 81.4%, respectively. Patients who completed 12 months of trastuzumab had a 9-year OS rate of 90.2% compared with 86.2% among patients receiving <12 months of therapy (adjusted HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.62–0.81).

Conclusions

Real-world HER2 + EBC patients are less likely to complete 12 months of trastuzumab than some clinical trial counterparts but have survival outcomes comparable to those reported in landmark RCTs.

Subject terms: Breast cancer, Targeted therapies, Translational research

Background

Human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancers are characterised by amplification of the HER2 gene or overexpression of the HER2 protein and account for 15–20% of breast malignancies.1 The introduction of HER2-targeted therapies has changed the treatment paradigm of HER2-positive cancers, which were previously associated with more aggressive disease and poorer outcomes.2,3

Trastuzumab was the first targeted therapy developed to treat HER2-positive breast cancers. Several randomised controlled trials (RCTs) demonstrated that trastuzumab in addition to adjuvant chemotherapy improves disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in women with HER2-positive early breast cancer.411 The majority of patients in the landmark RCTs received 12 months of adjuvant trastuzumab.4,6,10 As subsequent studies investigating the efficacy of shorter durations of adjuvant trastuzumab are conflicting,1220 12 months of trastuzumab remains the standard of care for HER2-positive early breast cancer. As the evidence for prescribing adjuvant trastuzumab is the strongest for high-risk cancers,4,6,10,11 not all early breast cancers underwent HER2 testing when trastuzumab was first introduced,21 and not all HER2-positive early breast cancers are treated with trastuzumab.2123

The strict eligibility criteria of RCTs limit their generalisability to patients treated in the clinic. Trial participants tend to have fewer adverse events and lower mortality rates than non-participants due to differences in their baseline characteristics and comorbidities.2428 Therefore, data generated from patients treated in routine care are instrumental in assessing whether RCT outcomes translate to the real-world setting. According to previous real-world studies, up to one-third of patients treated with adjuvant trastuzumab do not receive a standard, guideline-recommended chemotherapy regimen,29,30 and up to 23% do not complete the recommended 12-month course of trastuzumab.3135

By virtue of Australia’s universal health system, data are available on all patients who accessed trastuzumab for breast cancer since its public subsidy in 2006. In this whole-of-population study, we describe treatment patterns and outcomes associated with adjuvant trastuzumab for early breast cancer. Specifically, we describe patient characteristics, trastuzumab completion rates, survival and cancer recurrence outcomes, and the association of trastuzumab completion with outcomes.

Methods

Study setting

In Australia, all citizens and permanent residents have government-subsidised access to prescription medicines listed on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS). Trastuzumab has been PBS-listed for the adjuvant treatment of HER2-positive early breast cancer, irrespective of size and nodal status, since 1 October 2006. Trastuzumab for metastatic breast cancer was funded through the Herceptin Program, outside the PBS, from December 2001 until July 2015, when the Herceptin Program was discontinued and trastuzumab was PBS-listed for all breast cancer stages. We have previously described this whole-of-population cohort of HER2-positive breast cancer patients.36 Private insurance in Australia does not reimburse publicly subsidised medicines, so our study population likely captures all Australian residents receiving trastuzumab for HER2-positive early breast cancer.

Data sources

We conducted a retrospective, population-based, cohort study of all Australians with HER2-positve early breast cancer who received PBS trastuzumab in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings. The patient dataset includes sex, year of birth, month/year of death, remoteness of residence and socioeconomic disadvantage. Fact of death data was supplied in month/year format through linkage to the National Death Index. Cause of death was not available, so it was not possible to estimate breast cancer-specific survival. PBS-dispensing records comprise dispensing date, quantity dispensed and PBS-item number, which identifies the indication for which a medicine is prescribed (e.g. early or metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer) and the specific regimen (e.g. weekly or 3-weekly dosing) (Supplementary Table 1).

Study population

We included all patients who received ≥1 dispensing of PBS-subsidised trastuzumab for HER2-positive early breast cancer between 1 January 2007 and 30 June 2016. We excluded patients who initiated trastuzumab within the first 3 months of PBS listing of trastuzumab for early breast cancer (1 October–31 December 2006, n = 897) as they may have commenced trastuzumab outside the PBS before its public subsidy. We also excluded patients who were dispensed trastuzumab for metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer prior to receiving trastuzumab for early HER2-positive breast cancer (n = 320).

Trastuzumab use

We identified trastuzumab use based on Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification System (ATC) code L01XC03 and PBS-item numbers for early breast cancer.

We assigned 7 or 21 days of exposure to each trastuzumab dispensing based on PBS-item codes for weekly or 3-weekly dosing regimens. We summed the number of days of trastuzumab exposure over all dispensings for each patient. To allow for treatment breaks, we defined completion of a 12-month course of adjuvant trastuzumab as having ≥350 days of trastuzumab exposure within 540 days of trastuzumab initiation. We also examined patients with ≥270, ≥165 or ≥80 days of trastuzumab exposure. We selected 540 days as the observation time to assess trastuzumab completion to account for patients who may take longer than 12 months to complete a full course of adjuvant trastuzumab due to treatment holidays or concurrent illness; this definition has been used in previous studies of adjuvant trastuzumab using health administrative data.34,35 To determine completion rates, we restricted the population to patients with ≥540 days of follow-up (i.e. initiated trastuzumab between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2014) as this was the observation time used to assess completion of an entire course of adjuvant trastuzumab. We used logistic regression to identify baseline characteristics associated with completion of trastuzumab. We performed sensitivity analyses whereby we defined completion as having ≥350 days of trastuzumab exposure within 365 or 450 days of trastuzumab initiation.

Concomitant chemotherapy and endocrine therapy

We determined commonly prescribed (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy regimens based on the dispensing of cytotoxic agents, identified by ATC codes commencing with L01, in the period 120 days before until 60 days after the first trastuzumab dispensing. We defined oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive patients as those who were dispensed endocrine therapy within 120 days before or 540 days after the first trastuzumab dispensing.37 We identified patients who received a selective oestrogen receptor modulator (tamoxifen or toremifene) and/or aromatase inhibitor (anastrozole, letrozole or exemestane) by using ATC codes.

Outcomes

We calculated OS as the time between the first dispensing of adjuvant trastuzumab to the date of death, set as the last day of each month, as fact of death data was supplied in month and year format. All individuals had follow-up for date of death data until 31 May 2017. We used Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox regression analysis to examine factors associated with OS, including baseline characteristics and completion of trastuzumab course. When examining associations between trastuzumab completion and OS, we excluded patients who died within 540 days of trastuzumab initiation and did not have the opportunity to receive a full 12-month course.38

We used the date of the first trastuzumab dispensing for metastatic disease as a surrogate for recurrence of HER2-positive breast cancer, based on PBS-dispensing records available until 30 June 2016. We defined time to recurrence as the time between the first dispensing of adjuvant trastuzumab to the first trastuzumab dispensing for metastatic disease. We calculated recurrence-free survival (RFS) from the date of the first adjuvant trastuzumab dispensing to the date of recurrence or death.

For patients with at least 5 years of dispensing data follow-up (i.e. the first trastuzumab dispensing between 1 January 2007 and 30 June 2011), we calculated the number of recurrences occurring in each year of follow-up.

Ethics and data access

This study was approved by the NSW Population and Health Services Research Ethics Committee (Approval Number: 2010/02/213). The Australian Department of Human Services (DHS) External Request Evaluation Committee approved access to the data (Approval Numbers: MI1474, MI1475, MI1477 and MI5858).

Results

Study population

Between 1 October 2006 and 30 June 2016, 15,861 Australians were dispensed at least one dose of (neo)adjuvant trastuzumab for HER2-positive early breast cancer. Of these, 14,644 patients received their first trastuzumab dispensing between 1 January 2007 and 30 June 2016 and were included in our study (Table 1). Median age at the first trastuzumab dispensing was 55 years (range 22–94, interquartile range [IQR] 47–74). Most of them resided in a capital city (62.7%), and patients from the quintile with the most socioeconomic disadvantage were underrepresented (12.7%).

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of study population of all patients dispensed trastuzumab from 2007 to 2016 (n = 14,644)

Frequency (%)
Age at the first trastuzumab dispensing
 ≤30 years 179 1.2
 31–40 years 1354 9.3
 41–50 years 3661 25
 51–60 years 4558 31.1
 61–70 years 3333 22.8
 71–80 years 1349 9.2
 >80 years 210 1.4
Sex
 Female 14,590 99.6
 Male 54 0.4
Year of the first trastuzumab dispensing
 2007–2008 2353 16.1
 2009–2010 2823 19.3
 2011–2012 3068 21
 2013–2014 3659 25
 2015–2016 2741 18.7
Remoteness
 Capital cities 9177 62.7
 Other metropolitan centres 1155 7.9
 Large rural centres 965 6.6
 Other rural 2984 20.4
 Remote 238 1.6
 Missing 125 0.9
State
 New South Wales 4892 33.4
 Australian Capital Territory 210 1.4
 Northern Territory 122 0.8
 Queensland 2890 19.7
 South Australia 1098 7.5
 Tasmania 304 2.1
 Victoria 3864 26.4
 Western Australia 1264 8.6
Index of Relative Socioeconomic Disadvantage
 1 (most disadvantage) 1862 12.7
 2 3201 21.9
 3 2873 19.6
 4 3413 23.3
 5 (least disadvantage) 3234 22.1
 Missing 61 0.4

Trastuzumab use

Patients initiating adjuvant trastuzumab between 1 January 2007 and 30 June 2016 (n = 14,644) had a median of 17 trastuzumab dispensings (IQR 15–18).

Among patients with at least 540 days of follow-up (n = 11,903), 8018 (67.4%) completed 12 months of adjuvant trastuzumab (i.e. were dispensed ≥350 days of trastuzumab). 21.9% received 270–349 days of therapy, 5.6% received 165–269 days, 3.3% received 80–164 days and 1.8% received <80 days. Age >80, socioeconomic disadvantage and residing outside metropolitan areas were associated with lower likelihood of completing trastuzumab (Table 2). Patients initiating trastuzumab in later years were more likely to complete a 12-month course compared with those initiating in 2007–2008. In our sensitivity analyses, 58.0% of patients completed 12 months of trastuzumab within 365 days of initiation, and 66.3% of patients completed 12 months of trastuzumab within 450 days of initiation.

Table 2.

Baseline factors associated with completion of treatment (logistic regression) in patients with at least 540 days of follow-up from the first trastuzumab dispensing (i.e. initiated trastuzumab 2007–2014, n = 11903)

Completed the course Did not complete the course Univariate analysis Multivariable analysis
Odds ratio 95% CI Odds ratio 95% CI
Age category
  ≤30 years 102 46 1 Reference 1
  31–40 years 757 355 0.96 0.66–1.39 0.96 0.66–1.40
  41–50 years 2068 942 0.99 0.69–1.41 1.02 0.71–1.46
  51–60 years 2552 1206 0.95 0.67–1.36 0.99 0.69–1.42
  61–70 years 1819 891 0.92 0.64–1.32 0.95 0.66–1.37
  71–80 years 646 372 0.78 0.54–1.14 0.77 0.53–1.12
  80+ years 74 73 0.46 0.28–0.74 0.42 0.26–0.68
State
  New South Wales 2764 1185 1 1
  Australian Capital Territory 98 66 0.64 0.46–0.87 0.53 0.38–0.74
  Northern Territory 64 41 0.67 0.45–1.00 0.82 0.54–1.25
  Queensland 1531 826 0.8 0.71–0.89 0.85 0.76–0.96
  South Australia 504 396 0.55 0.47–0.63 0.54 0.47–0.63
  Tasmania 152 89 0.73 0.56–0.96 0.75 0.57–0.99
 Victoria 2231 936 1.02 0.92–1.13 1.02 0.91–1.13
  Western Australia 674 346 0.84 0.72–0.97 0.81 0.69–0.94
Index of relative socioeconomic disadvantage
  1 (most disadvantage) 946 529 1 1
  2 1711 905 1.06 0.93–1.21 1.05 0.92–1.21
  3 1549 797 1.09 0.95–1.25 1.03 0.89–1.19
  4 1921 879 1.22 1.07–1.40 1.13 0.98–1.29
  5 (least disadvantage) 1869 761 1.37 1.20–1.57 1.23 1.06–1.42
  Missing 22 14 0.88 0.45–1.73 0.74 0.36–1.51
Remoteness
  Capital cities 5204 2283 1 1
  Other metropolitan centres 631 261 1.06 0.91–1.24 1.04 0.88–1.22
  Large rural centres 461 338 0.6 0.52–0.69 0.61 0.52–0.72
  Other rural 1554 876 0.78 0.71–0.86 0.83 0.75–0.92
  Remote 98 97 0.44 0.33–0.59 0.47 0.35–0.64
  Missing 70 30 1.02 0.67–1.57 1.1 0.70–1.74
Year of the first trastuzumab dispensing
  2007–2008 1427 926 1 1
  2009–2010 1872 951 1.28 1.14–1.43 1.28 1.14–1.44
  2011–2012 2147 921 1.51 1.35–1.69 1.55 1.38–1.74
  2013–2014 2572 1087 1.54 1.38–1.71 1.62 1.45–1.81

Chemotherapy

Among patients initiating adjuvant trastuzumab between 1 January 2007 and 30 June 2016, 14,079 (96.1%) were dispensed at least one dose of concomitant chemotherapy (Table 3). Of these, nearly all received a taxane-based regimen, with (48.4%) or without an anthracycline (47.3%). Patients dispensed anthracyclines and taxanes were younger than those receiving non-anthracycline taxane-based regimens (mean 52.6 vs. 57.9 years). Among patients with at least 540 days of follow-up, we did not observe an association between receiving anthracycline and likelihood of completing 12 months of trastuzumab (HR 0.95 for anthracycline- and taxane-based regimens vs. non-anthracycline taxane-based regimens, 95% CI 0.87–1.04).

Table 3.

Chemotherapy regimens based on dispensings between 120 days before and 60 days after trastuzumab initiation (n = 14,644)

Frequency (%)
No chemotherapy drugs dispensed 565 4.9
At least one chemotherapy drug dispensed 14,079 96.1
Anthracycline- and taxane-based 6809 46.5
 AC-TH 3287 22.4
 FEC-DH 1561 13.7
 Other 1961 13.4
Taxane-based (no anthracycline) 6664 45.5
 TCH 3293 22.5
 Paclitaxel–trastuzumab 1517 10.4
 Docetaxel–trastuzumab 586 4
 Other
Anthracycline-based (no taxane) 426 2.9
No anthracycline or taxane 180 1.2
 CMF-H 25 0.2
 Other 155 1.1

AC-TH doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, taxane and trastuzumab, FEC-DH 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, docetaxel and trastuzumab, TCH docetaxel, carboplatin and trastuzumab, CMF-H cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil and trastuzumab

Endocrine therapy

More than half of patients (n = 8,444, 57.7%) received at least one dispensing of endocrine therapy. The mean ages of endocrine therapy recipients and non-recipients were similar (54.8 vs. 55.9 years).

Outcomes

Overall survival

By 31 May 2017, there were 1044 deaths (7.1%) among 14,644 patients initiating trastuzumab between 1 January 2007 and 30 June 2016, after median follow-up time of 4.7 years. The annual OS probabilities for this cohort are presented in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Annual overall and recurrence-free survival probabilities (n = 14644) of patients still in follow-up

In a multivariable model examining baseline characteristics, older age at the first trastuzumab dispensing, socioeconomic disadvantage and earlier year of trastuzumab initiation were associated with poorer survival (Table 4).

Table 4.

Baseline characteristics associated with overall survival (n = 14644)

Univariate analysis Multivariable analysis
Hazard ratio 95% CI Hazard ratio 95% CI
Age category
 ≤30 years 1 1
 31–40 years 0.81 0.45–1.46 0.81 0.45–1.46
 41–50 years 0.69 0.39–1.21 0.68 0.39–1.19
 51–60 years 0.79 0.45–1.37 0.76 0.44–1.33
 61–70 years 1.16 0.67–2.03 0.13 0.65–1.98
 71–80 years 2.05 1.17–3.61 2.07 1.17–3.63
 80+ years 6.11 3.35–11.14 6.45 3.53–11.78
Remoteness
 Capital cities 1
 Other metropolitan centres 1.04 0.82–1.32
 Large rural centres 1.11 0.87–1.41
 Other rural 1.15 0.99–1.33
 Remote 0.92 0.54–1.57
 Missing 1.32 0.73–2.40
State
 New South Wales 1
 Australian Capital Territory 1.23 0.76–2.01
 Northern Territory 0.63 0.28–1.42
 Queensland 0.9 0.76–1.07
 South Australia 1.08 0.86–1.36
 Tasmania 0.96 0.60–1.55
 Victoria 0.97 0.83–1.14
 Western Australia 0.76 0.58–0.98
Index of relative socioeconomic disadvantage
 1 (most disadvantage) 1 1
 2 0.97 0.08–1.19 0.95 0.78–1.15
 3 0.78 0.63–0.97 0.76 0.62–0.94
 4 0.8 0.66–0.98 0.78 0.64–0.96
 5 (least disadvantage) 0.63 0.51–0.78 0.6 0.48–0.74
 Missing 1.56 0.64–3.80 1.75 0.72–4.27
Year of the first dispensing
 2007–2008 1 1
 2009–2010 1.04 0.88–1.23 0.99 0.84–1.16
 2011–2012 0.86 0.71–1.03 0.79 0.66–0.95
 2013–2014 0.91 0.74–1.12 0.78 0.63–0.95
 2015–2016 0.91 0.64–1.29 0.74 0.52–1.05

Survival by completion of trastuzumab course

In our multivariable analysis, excluding 133 patients who died within 540 days of their first dispensing of trastuzumab, not completing 12 months of adjuvant trastuzumab was associated with shorter OS (HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.23–1.62), after adjusting for age, socioeconomic disadvantage and year of trastuzumab initiation. Five- and 9-year survival probabilities were 94.6 and 90.2% among patients who completed 12 months of trastuzumab, and 91.8 and 86.2% among those who did not.

Recurrence

By 30 June 2016, 1,052 patients (7.2%) received at least one dispensing of trastuzumab for metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer. Figure 1 describes the annual RFS rates for patients commencing trastuzumab between 2007 and 2016.

Among patients with at least 5 years of follow-up (n = 5,926), 526 had a cancer recurrence (8.8%). Median duration of follow-up was 6.9 years (IQR 5.7–8.1 years). The number of recurrences in each year of follow-up is described in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Number of recurrences by year of follow-up for patients with at least 5 years of follow-up (n = 5926)

Discussion

We report on nearly 15,000 patients who received trastuzumab for non-metastatic breast cancer in Australia between 2007 and 2016; to our knowledge, this is the largest cohort of HER2-positive breast cancer patients studied in a population-based setting. Survival outcomes in this observational study are similar to those reported in the landmark RCTs in HER2-positive early breast cancer.4,6,10 However, in contrast to some clinical trials, only two-thirds of patients initiating trastuzumab in our study completed the standard 12-month course.

This study illustrates the differences between RCT populations and patients treated in clinical practice and highlights the value of real-world studies in verifying and complementing clinical trial findings. The proportion of patients aged ≥60 years is twice as high in our study (33%) as in seminal RCTs of adjuvant trastuzumab (16%),4,6 confirming underrepresentation of older patients in clinical trials.25,26 The 12-month trastuzumab completion rate of 67.2% in our study was similar to the treatment completion rate of 68.6% in the NCCTG N9831/NSABP B-31 trials,4 but lower than 91.5% reported in the HERA trial.6 In our study, patients who did not complete 12 months of trastuzumab were more likely to be older, be socioeconomically disadvantaged and reside in rural and remote areas, all groups underrepresented in clinical trials.27,39,40

Despite lower completion rates, the outcomes of our study are comparable to landmark clinical trials; the 5-year OS rate in our study is 92.7%, compared with the 4-year OS rate of 89.3% in the HERA trial8 and 5-year OS rates of 91–92% in the BCIRG 006 trial.10 Our 9-year OS rate (87.9%) was similar to the 10-year OS (84%) reported in the NCCTG N98931/NSABP B-31 trials.5 OS estimates in our study are probably ameliorated by the absence of requirements for minimum tumour size or nodal status for accessing trastuzumab for HER2-positive early breast cancer in Australia, whereas most RCTs recruited only patients with tumours that were lymph node positive and/or larger than 1–2 cm.4,6,10 Therefore, we hypothesise that patients in our study were more likely to have cancers with favourable prognostic features than those in clinical trials, a finding that has been reported in previous real-world studies.35,41,42 The introduction of novel HER2-targeted agents for patients with recurrent metastatic disease probably also improved OS rates in our study, particularly for patients diagnosed in later years.

Patients who did not complete 1 year of trastuzumab had a 41% increased risk of death compared with those who did (HR 1.41), although the absolute difference between the groups is small (9-year OS rate 86.2 vs. 90.2%). The difference in survival associated with completing a year of trastuzumab in our study is larger than that reported in a meta-analysis of RCTs comparing 12 months with shorter durations of trastuzumab (HR 1.16).43 This is probably due to differences between clinical trial and real-world populations, as well as unmeasured confounders in our study, such as baseline cardiac impairment, that increase the likelihood of both early treatment cessation and death.

We report 4- and 5-year RFS rates of 88.4 and 86.8%, respectively. These figures may underestimate true recurrence rates as they are based on the receipt of trastuzumab for metastatic disease as a surrogate for recurrence. However, they are not dissimilar to 4-year DFS rates of 78.6–85.3% and 5-year DFS rates of 81–84% reported in clinical trials.8,10,44 Among patients with ≥5 years of follow-up, 87% of all recurrences occurred within 5 years of initiating adjuvant trastuzumab (Fig. 2). The majority of patients (70%) who started trastuzumab for metastatic disease did so during years 2–4 after their first dose of adjuvant trastuzumab. This suggests that the first 3 years after completing adjuvant trastuzumab are the most clinically relevant time period for monitoring and detecting recurrent metastatic disease in HER2-positive breast cancer.

When novel treatments are considered for public reimbursement, policy makers need reliable data on estimated treatment uptake and efficacy to support decision-making. Therefore, lower-than-expected rates of trastuzumab completion in routine practice have implications for the real-world applicability and assessment for reimbursement of novel HER2-targeted agents, such as neratinib, that are intended for use after patients complete 12 months of adjuvant trastuzumab.45 Patients in remote regions were 53% less likely to complete treatment compared with patients in capital cities, and those with the least socioeconomic disadvantage were 23% more likely to complete treatment than those with the most disadvantage. Therefore, geographical and financial barriers may limit patients’ ability to complete recommended treatment and potentially compromise cancer outcomes, although remoteness was not associated with survival in our study.

The major strength of our study lies in our ability to use population-wide medicines dispensing and survival data from a national, representative, cohort across all age groups, not just over 65s. However, the trade-off in utilising population-wide health administrative data is the lack of detailed clinical information, which contrasts with studies that have this information but are most commonly conducted in smaller and not necessarily generalisable populations. Our study is limited by the lack of clinical details such as tumour size and stage and patient comorbidities, including pre-existing cardiac disease. We did not have information on cause of death and therefore examined OS only. We also did not have access to clinical records documenting reasons for non-completion of 12 months of trastuzumab or exact dates or sites of relapse of metastatic disease.

Conclusion

Although HER2-positive early breast cancer patients in the community are less likely to complete a 12-month course of adjuvant trastuzumab than clinical trial counterparts, survival and recurrence rates in this real-world population are reassuringly comparable to those reported in landmark clinical trials. Real-world studies of cancer medicine utilisation and outcomes provide valuable data to substantiate clinical trial results and support clinical and policy decision-making.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Table 1 (10.5KB, xlsx)

Author contributions

M.T., A.S. and S.P. were responsible for conceiving of and designing the study. M.T. and A.S. were responsible for statistical analysis. M.T., A.S., B.E.K., B.D., R.J.S., C.K.L. and S.P. were responsible for data analysis and interpretation. M.T. was responsible for writing the paper. M.T., A.S., B.E.K., B.D., R.J.S., C.K.L. and S.P. were responsible for editing and reviewing the paper.

Competing interests

M.T. reports travel support from Roche, outside the submitted work. B.E.K. reports funding from Roche and TEVA for participating in advisory boards; speakers fees from Roche and Novartis; travel/conference expenses from Roche. S.A.P. is a member of the Drug Utilisation Sub Committee of the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee. The views expressed in this paper do not represent those of the committee. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the New South Wales Population and Health Services Research Ethics Committee (Approval Number: 2010/02/213). The Ethics Committee granted a waiver of the usual requirement for the consent of the individual to the use of their health information in a research project, in line with the guidelines approved under Section 95/95A of the Privacy Act 1988. The study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Funding

This research is supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Centre of Research Excellence in Medicines and Ageing (ID: 1060407) and a Cooperative Research Centre Project (CRC-P) Grant from the Australian Government Department of Industry, Innovation and Science (ID: CRC-P-439). M.T. is supported by a NHMRC Postgraduate Research Scholarship (ID: 1151479), a National Breast Cancer Foundation Postgraduate Scholarship Top-Up (ID: DS-18-01), and a Translational Cancer Research Network Clinical PhD Scholarship Top-Up award, supported by the Cancer Institute NSW. A.S. is supported by a NHMRC Early Career Fellowship (ID: 1158763).

Consent to publish

Not applicable.

Data availability

We thank the Australian Government Department of Human Services for providing the data. Data access was granted by the Australian Government Department of Human Services External Request Evaluation Committee (Approval Numbers: MI1474, MI1475, MI1477 and MI5858). Access to the datasets analysed during this study is not permitted without the express permission of the approving human research ethics committees and data custodians.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41416-019-0612-5.

References

  • 1.Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Hicks DG, Dowsett M, McShane LM, Allison KH, et al. Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013;31:3997–4013. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.50.9984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Slamon DJ, Clark GM, Wong SG, Levin WJ, Ullrich A, McGuire WL. Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene. Science. 1987;235:177–182. doi: 10.1126/science.3798106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Loibl S, Gianni L. HER2-positive breast cancer. Lancet. 2017;389:2415–2429. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32417-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Romond EH, Perez EA, Bryant J, Suman VJ, Geyer CE, Davidson NE, et al. Trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for operable HER2-positive breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005;353:1673–1684. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa052122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Perez EA, Romond EH, Suman VJ, Jeong J-H, Sledge G, Geyer CE, Jr, et al. Trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive breast cancer: planned joint analysis of overall survival from NSABP B-31 and NCCTG N9831. J. Clin. Oncol. 2014;32:3744. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.5730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Piccart-Gebhart MJ, Procter M, Leyland-Jones B, Goldhirsch A, Untch M, Smith I, et al. Trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005;353:1659–1672. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa052306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Smith I, Procter M, Gelber RD, Guillaume S, Feyereislova A, Dowsett M, et al. 2-year follow-up of trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007;369:29–36. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60028-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gianni L, Dafni U, Gelber RD, Azambuja E, Muehlbauer S, Goldhirsch A, et al. Treatment with trastuzumab for 1 year after adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer: a 4-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:236–244. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70033-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Goldhirsch A, Gelber RD, Piccart-Gebhart MJ, de Azambuja E, Procter M, Suter TM, et al. 2 years versus 1 year of adjuvant trastuzumab for HER2-positive breast cancer (HERA): an open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2013;382:1021–1028. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61094-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Slamon D, Eiermann W, Robert N, Pienkowski T, Martin M, Press M, et al. Adjuvant trastuzumab in HER2-positive breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011;365:1273–1283. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0910383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Joensuu H, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen P-L, Bono P, Alanko T, Kataja V, Asola R, et al. Adjuvant docetaxel or vinorelbine with or without trastuzumab for breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2006;354:809–820. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa053028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Pivot X, Romieu G, Debled M, Pierga JY, Kerbrat P, Bachelot T, et al. 6 months versus 12 months of adjuvant trastuzumab for patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer (PHARE): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:741–748. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70225-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Pivot, X., Romieu, G., Debled, M., Pierga, J.-Y., Kerbrat, P., Bachelot, T. et al. 6 months versus 12 months of adjuvant trastuzumab in early breast cancer (PHARE): final analysis of a multicentre, open-label, phase 3 randomised trial. Lancet393, 2591–2598 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 14.Mavroudis D, Saloustros E, Malamos N, Kakolyris S, Boukovinas I, Papakotoulas P, et al. Six versus 12 months of adjuvant trastuzumab in combination with dose-dense chemotherapy for women with HER2-positive breast cancer: a multicenter randomized study by the Hellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG) Ann. Oncol. 2015;26:1333–1340. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Conte, P., Frassoldati, A., Bisagni, G., Brandes, A. A., Donadio, M., Garrone, O. et al. Nine weeks vs 1 year adjuvant trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy: final results of the phase III randomized Short-HER study. Ann. Oncol.29, 2328–2333 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 16.Earl, H. M., Hiller, L., Vallier, A.-L., Loi, S., McAdam, K., Hughes-Davies, L. et al. 6 versus 12 months of adjuvant trastuzumab for HER2-positive early breast cancer (PERSEPHONE): 4-year disease-free survival results of a randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial. The Lancet. 393, 2599–2612. 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30650-6. Epub 2019 Jun 6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 17.Earl HM, Hiller L, Vallier A-L, Loi S, McAdam K, Hughes-Davies L, et al. 6 versus 12 months of adjuvant trastuzumab for HER2-positive early breast cancer (PERSEPHONE): 4-year disease-free survival results of a randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2019;393:2599–2612. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30650-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Joensuu H, Fraser J, Wildiers H, et al. Effect of adjuvant trastuzumab for a duration of 9 weeks vs 1 year with concomitant chemotherapy for early human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive breast cancer: The sold randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4:1199–1206. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.1380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Senkus E, Kyriakides S, Ohno S, Penault-Llorca F, Poortmans P, Rutgers E, et al. Primary breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up†. Ann. Oncol. 2015;26(suppl_5):v8–v30. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Guidelines Breast Cancer Version 1. In: National ComprehensiveCancer Netowrk; 2019.
  • 21.Whitfield R, Kollias J, De Silva P, Zorbas H, Maddern G. Use of trastuzumab in Australia and New Zealand: results from the National Breast Cancer Audit. ANZ J. Surg. 2012;82:234–239. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2011.05998.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Pagani O, Regan MM, Walley BA, Fleming GF, Colleoni M, Láng I, et al. Adjuvant exemestane with ovarian suppression in premenopausal breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014;371:107–118. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1404037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Harris, C. A., Pearson, S., Daniels, B., Srasuebkul, P. & Ward, R. L. HER2-positive early breast cancer (HER2EBC): an Australian pattern of care study. J. Clin. Oncol.31, 101–101 (2013).
  • 24.Avorn J. In defense of pharmacoepidemiology-embracing the yin and yang of drug research. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007;357:2219. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0706892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hutchins LF, Unger JM, Crowley JJ, Coltman CA, Jr., Albain KS. Underrepresentation of patients 65 years of age or older in cancer-treatment trials. N. Engl. J. Med. 1999;341:2061–2067. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199912303412706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lewis JH, Kilgore ML, Goldman DP, Trimble EL, Kaplan R, Montello MJ, et al. Participation of patients 65 years of age or older in cancer clinical trials. J. Clin.Oncol. 2003;21:1383–1389. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Van Spall HG, Toren A, Kiss A, Fowler RA. Eligibility criteria of randomized controlled trials published in high-impact general medical journals: a systematic sampling review. JAMA. 2007;297:1233–1240. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.11.1233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Davis S, Wright PW, Schulman SF, Hill LD, Pinkham RD, Johnson LP, et al. Participants in prospective, randomized clinical trials for resected non‐small cell lung cancer have improved survival compared with nonparticipants in such trials. Cancer. 1985;56:1710–1718. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19851001)56:7&#x0003c;1710::AID-CNCR2820560741&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-T. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Freedman RA, Vaz-Luis I, Barry WT, Lii H, Lin NU, Winer EP, et al. Patterns of chemotherapy, toxicity, and short-term outcomes for older women receiving adjuvant trastuzumab-based therapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;145:491–501. doi: 10.1007/s10549-014-2968-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Reeder-Hayes K, Peacock Hinton S, Meng K, Carey LA, Dusetzina SB. Disparities in Use of Human Epidermal Growth Hormone Receptor 2-Targeted Therapy for Early-Stage Breast Cancer. J. Clin.Oncol. 2016;34:2003–2009. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.65.8716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Chan A, McGregor SR. Prevalence and management of HER2/neu-positive early breast cancer in a single institution following availability of adjuvant trastuzumab. Intern Med J. 2012;42:267–274. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2011.02432.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Campiglio M, Bufalino R, Sasso M, Ferri E, Casalini P, Adamo V, et al. Effect of adjuvant trastuzumab treatment in conventional clinical setting: an observational retrospective multicenter Italian study. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2013;141:101–110. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2658-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Freedman RA, Hughes ME, Ottesen RA, Weeks JC, He Y, Wong YN, et al. Use of adjuvant trastuzumab in women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer by race/ethnicity and education within the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Cancer. 2013;119:839–846. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Vaz-Luis I, Keating NL, Lin NU, Lii H, Winer EP, Freedman RA. Duration and toxicity of adjuvant trastuzumab in older patients with early-stage breast cancer: a population-based study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2014;32:927–934. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.51.1261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Reeder-Hayes KE, Meyer AM, Hinton SP, Meng K, Carey LA, Dusetzina SB. Comparative toxicity and effectiveness of trastuzumab-based chemotherapy regimens in older women with early-stage breast cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2017;35:3298–3305. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.71.4345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Daniels B, Lord SJ, Kiely BE, Houssami N, Haywood P, Lu CY, et al. Use and outcomes of targeted therapies in early and metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer in Australia: protocol detailing observations in a whole of population cohort. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e014439. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Srasuebkul P, Dobbins TA, Pearson SA. Validation of a proxy for estrogen receptor status in breast cancer patients using dispensing data. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Oncol. 2014;10:e63–e68. doi: 10.1111/ajco.12015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Suissa S. Immortal time bias in pharmacoepidemiology. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2007;167:492–499. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sateren WB, Trimble EL, Abrams J, Brawley O, Breen N, Ford L, et al. How sociodemographics, presence of oncology specialists, and hospital cancer programs affect accrual to cancer treatment trials. J. Clin. Oncol. 2002;20:2109–2117. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.08.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Gross CP, Filardo G, Mayne ST, Krumholz HM. The impact of socioeconomic status and race on trial participation for older women with breast cancer. Cancer. 2005;103:483–491. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Arpino G, Michelotti A, Truini M, Montemurro F, Russo S, Palumbo R, et al. Demographic, tumor and clinical features of clinical trials versus clinical practice patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer: results of a prospective study. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2016;142:669–678. doi: 10.1007/s00432-015-2033-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Seferina SC, Lobbezoo DJ, de Boer M, Dercksen MW, van den Berkmortel F, van Kampen RJ, et al. Real-life use and effectiveness of adjuvant trastuzumab in early breast cancer patients: a study of the Southeast Netherlands Breast Cancer Consortium. Oncologist. 2015;20:856–863. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Chen L., Zhou W., Hu X., Yi M., Ye C. & Yao G. Short-duration versus 1-year adjuvant trastuzumab in early HER2 positive breast cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Cancer Treat. Rev.75, 12–19 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 44.Perez EA, Romond EH, Suman VJ, Jeong J-H, Davidson NE, Geyer CE, Jr, et al. Four-year follow-up of trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for operable human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive breast cancer: joint analysis of data from NCCTG N9831 and NSABP B-31. J. Clin. Oncol. 2011;29:3366. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.35.0868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Martin M, Holmes FA, Ejlertsen B, Delaloge S, Moy B, Iwata H, et al. Neratinib after trastuzumab-based adjuvant therapy in HER2-positive breast cancer (ExteNET): 5-year analysis of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18:1688–1700. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30717-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Table 1 (10.5KB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

We thank the Australian Government Department of Human Services for providing the data. Data access was granted by the Australian Government Department of Human Services External Request Evaluation Committee (Approval Numbers: MI1474, MI1475, MI1477 and MI5858). Access to the datasets analysed during this study is not permitted without the express permission of the approving human research ethics committees and data custodians.


Articles from British Journal of Cancer are provided here courtesy of Cancer Research UK

RESOURCES