Skip to main content
Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology logoLink to Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology
editorial
. 2019 Oct 5;8(4):643–644. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2019.08.005

DeMISTifying Paneth Cell Maturation

Lillian B Spatz 1,2, Jason C Mills 1,2,
PMCID: PMC6889777  PMID: 31593647

Paneth cells contribute to the maintenance of the enteric microbiome and the intestinal stem cell microenvironment by secreting numerous antimicrobial factors and growth factors. Their secretory function depends on induction and maintenance of subcellular secretory architecture via unknown mechanisms. In this issue of Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dekaney et al1 show that the basic helix-loop-helix Class A basic helix-loop-helix protien 15 (BHLHA15)/Muscle, Intestine, and Stomach expression 1 (MIST1) (BHLHA15) helps govern secretory function in Paneth cells.

Paneth cells play key roles in the small intestine. They shape the enteric microbiome by secreting antimicrobial peptides,2 and they may collaborate with mesenchymal telocytes to support adjacent intestinal stem cells in the crypts during homeostasis and after regeneration.3 The transcriptional regulators that dictate Paneth cell differentiation from stem cells have largely been characterized4, 5; however, it has not been clear how the elaborate secretory machinery is induced and maintained throughout the relatively long lifespan of these cells. In addition, there is limited understanding of so-called intermediate cells, which may be precursors for Paneth and goblet cells and express markers of both those lineages.

In this issue of Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dekaney et al1 make important steps toward increasing our understanding of Paneth and intermediate cells. Similar to pancreatic acinar and gastric chief cells, Paneth cells have long lifespans and elaborate exocrine secretory machinery. Dekaney et al1 reasoned that Paneth cells also might share dependence on the basic loop helix transcription factor BHLHA15 (MIST1), which regulates maturation and secretory architecture in acinar and chief cells.6, 7, 8, 9, 10 Accordingly, they showed that Paneth cells lacking MIST1 have altered secretory machinery with disorganized, swollen, rough endoplasmic reticulum (ER) cisternae and decreased diameter of secretory granules. Loss of MIST1 does not otherwise disrupt cell fate decisions of any other intestinal lineage besides Paneth cells, and upstream transcription factors that coordinate to specify differentiation of Paneth cells from stem cells, including Spdef, Sox9, and Gfi3, are similarly unaffected. However, failed maturation of Paneth cells causes an increase in cells harboring an intermediate phenotype (ie, cells in Mist1-/- crypts co-expressed goblet and Paneth markers), suggesting that MIST1-governed maturation of the secretory apparatus in Paneth cells is required for the cells to quench goblet cell gene expression.

Inhibition of Notch signaling, which disrupts lineage fate decisions, also causes intermediate cell increase.11 However, Dekaney et al1 found no alterations in Notch in the absence of MIST1, indicating that the increased intermediate cell phenotype in Mist1 null mice likely is owing to defects in cell-autonomous terminal maturation and/or maintenance of Paneth cells, and again is not an effect of cell fate choice. Dekaney et al1 also previously observed an increase in intermediate cells after doxorubicin-induced damage.12 In the current article, Dekaney et al1 found that organoids grown from Mist1-/- crypts have increased budding relative to wild-type. They interpreted this as showing that lack of MIST1 does not compromise Paneth cell ability to support stem cells in an ex vivo situation. Alternatively, but not mutually exclusively, disruption of the intestinal epithelium followed by culture ex vivo may induce Paneth cells to revert to a stem cell role,13, 14 consistent with an emerging role for plasticity of mature cells in regeneration.15 Perhaps Mist1-/- Paneth cells, with their more intermediate cell phenotype, have more potential to revert to stem or progenitor cells after stress similar to doxorubicin or ex vivo culture in organoids.

Dekaney et al1 stimulate a number of questions. First, many of the transcriptional targets of MIST1 that help coordinate the secretory phenotype in cells in diverse tissues have been identified (eg, RAB3D and RAB26),8, 16 which are required in Paneth cells? Second, MIST1 has been shown to be regulated by and also regulate the key ER maintaining gene Xbp1,17, 18 how much of the Paneth cell phenotype is caused by ER stress? Third, would Mist1-/- crypts be better at regenerating after stem cell injury (eg by doxorubicin)? Would any such phenotype occur because Paneth cells themselves are key sources of cells and/or because Mist1-/- Paneth cells support actual stem cells differentially? It seems relevant to note that it may not be a coincidence that many of the mature cells already described to be able to re-enter the cell cycle after injury express MIST1 and then rapidly scale it down as they scale down their mature cell architecture. It has been proposed that there may be universal mechanisms for recruiting mature cells back into the cell cycle (a process termed paligenosis).19 MIST1-mediated downscaling may be a critical aspect of paligenosis of secretory cells.

Footnotes

Conflicts of interest The authors disclose no conflicts.

Funding Supported by the National Institutes of HealthNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases grants R01 DK094989 and R01 DK105129 (J.C.M.).

References

  • 1.Dekaney C.M., King S., Sheahan B., Cortes J.E. Mist1 Expression is Required for Paneth Cell Maturation. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;8:549–560. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2019.07.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ayabe T., Satchell D.P., Wilson C.L., Parks W.C., Selsted M.E., Ouellette A.J. Secretion of microbial alpha-defensins by intestinal Paneth cells in response to bacteria. Nat Immunol. 2000;1:113–118. doi: 10.1038/77783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kaestner K.H. The intestinal stem cell niche: a central role for Foxl1-expressing subepithelial telocytes. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;8:111–117. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2019.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Shroyer N.F., Wallis D., Venken K.J., Bellen H.J., Zoghbi H.Y. Gfi1 functions downstream of Math1 to control intestinal secretory cell subtype allocation and differentiation. Genes Dev. 2005;19:2412–2417. doi: 10.1101/gad.1353905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gregorieff A., Stange D.E., Kujala P., Begthel H., van den Born M., Korving J., Peters P.J., Clevers H. The ets-domain transcription factor Spdef promotes maturation of goblet and Paneth cells in the intestinal epithelium. Gastroenterology. 2009;137:1333–1345. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.06.044. e1–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bredemeyer A.J., Geahlen J.H., Weis V.G., Huh W.J., Zinselmeyer B.H., Srivatsan S., Miller M.J., Shaw A.S., Mills J.C. The gastric epithelial progenitor cell niche and differentiation of the zymogenic (chief) cell lineage. Dev Biol. 2009;325:211–224. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.10.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Direnzo D., Hess D.A., Damsz B., Hallett J.E., Marshall B., Goswami C., Liu Y., Deering T., Macdonald R.J., Konieczny S.F. Induced Mist1 expression promotes remodeling of mouse pancreatic acinar cells. Gastroenterology. 2012;143:469–480. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.04.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lo H.G., Jin R.U., Sibbel G., Liu D., Karki A., Joens M.S., Madison B.B., Zhang B., Blanc V., Fitzpatrick J.A., Davidson N.O., Konieczny S.F., Mills J.C. A single transcription factor is sufficient to induce and maintain secretory cell architecture. Genes Dev. 2017;31:154–171. doi: 10.1101/gad.285684.116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mills J.C., Taghert P.H. Scaling factors: transcription factors regulating subcellular domains. Bioessays. 2012;34:10–16. doi: 10.1002/bies.201100089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pin C.L., Bonvissuto A.C., Konieczny S.F. Mist1 expression is a common link among serous exocrine cells exhibiting regulated exocytosis. Anat Rec. 2000;259:157–167. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(20000601)259:2<157::AID-AR6>3.0.CO;2-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Afelik S., Qu X., Hasrouni E., Bukys M.A., Deering T., Nieuwoudt S., Rogers W., MacDonald R.J., Jensen J. Notch-mediated patterning and cell fate allocation of pancreatic progenitor cells. Development. 2012;139:1744–1753. doi: 10.1242/dev.075804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.King S.L., Mohiuddin J.J., Dekaney C.M. Paneth cells expand from newly created and preexisting cells during repair after doxorubicin-induced damage. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2013;305:G151–G162. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00441.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yu S., Tong K., Zhao Y., Balasubramanian I., Yap G.S., Ferraris R.P., Bonder E.M., Verzi M.P., Gao N. Paneth cell multi-potency induced by Notch activation following injury. Cell Stem Cell. 2018;23:46–59.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2018.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Jones J.C., Brindley C.D., Elder N.H., Myers M.G., Jr., Rajala M.W., Dekaney C.M., McNamee E.N., Frey M.R., Shroyer N.F., Dempsey P.J. Cellular plasticity of Defa4Cre-expressing Paneth cells in response to notch activation and intestinal injury. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;7:533–554. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2018.11.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Burclaff J., Mills J.C. Plasticity of differentiated cells in wound repair and tumorigenesis, part II: skin and intestine. Dis Model Mech. 2018;11 doi: 10.1242/dmm.035071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tian X., Jin R.U., Bredemeyer A.J., Oates E.J., Blazewska K.M., McKenna C.E., Mills J.C. RAB26 and RAB3D are direct transcriptional targets of MIST1 that regulate exocrine granule maturation. Mol Cell Biol. 2010;30:1269–1284. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01328-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Huh W.J., Esen E., Geahlen J.H., Bredemeyer A.J., Lee A.H., Shi G., Konieczny S.F., Glimcher L.H., Mills J.C. XBP1 controls maturation of gastric zymogenic cells by induction of MIST1 and expansion of the rough endoplasmic reticulum. Gastroenterology. 2010;139:2038–2049. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.08.050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hess D.A., Strelau K.M., Karki A., Jiang M., Azevedo-Pouly A.C., Lee A.H., Deering T.G., Hoang C.Q., MacDonald R.J., Konieczny S.F. MIST1 links secretion and stress as both target and regulator of the unfolded protein response. Mol Cell Biol. 2016;36:2931–2944. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00366-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Willet S.G., Lewis M.A., Miao Z.F., Liu D., Radyk M.D., Cunningham R.L., Burclaff J., Sibbel G., Lo H.G., Blanc V., Davidson N.O., Wang Z.N., Mills J.C. Regenerative proliferation of differentiated cells by mTORC1-dependent paligenosis. EMBO J. 2018;37 doi: 10.15252/embj.201798311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES