Skip to main content
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
letter
. 2019 Jan 25;364:l366. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l366

Sweeteners are added to modify consumer behaviour

Sven E Jordt 1, Sairam Jabba 1
PMCID: PMC6890469  PMID: 30683659

The meta-analysis by Toews and colleagues indicates that artificial sweeteners are safe to consume, but their uses go beyond sugar substitution and calorie reduction.1 2 Artificial sweeteners allow the cheaper and more efficient production of highly processed foods with long shelf lives and enable the formulation of new sweet products.

Sweeteners such as sucralose or aspartame are 200-600 times sweeter than sugar. Novel candy products and beverages often contain sugar and artificial sweeteners together, with different combinations of nutritive and hedonic effects. The consumption of artificial sweeteners, and of products combining sugars and artificial sweeteners, has strongly increased.3 Children are known to seek out more highly sweetened products, so the effects of early exposure on future consumption of processed foods and their health effects must be investigated.4

Artificial sweeteners are added to products that traditionally have not been sweetened or were sweetened to a much lower degree. We found that newly introduced snus products, a form of smokeless tobacco, contain much higher levels of artificial sweeteners than confectionery products and older smokeless products.5 In some cases, these products are so strongly sweetened that they are significantly sweeter than their weight in sugar. We also found artificial sweeteners in the mouthpieces and wrappers of flavoured cigarillos strongly preferred by adolescents.6 Sweetness is known to suppress bitter taste perception and irritation associated with tobacco use,7 suggesting that artificial sweeteners are added by tobacco manufacturers to facilitate use initiation and transition to tobacco addiction. These examples show that artificial sweeteners are not always used for calorie reduction but are added strategically to modify consumer behaviour.

Competing interests: SEJ’s research is supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse and the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Center for Tobacco Products of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) under award numbers U54DA036151 and R01ES029435. The content of this letter is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the views of the NIH or the FDA. SEJ received research reagents from GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals and provided consulting services to Hydra Biosciences and Sanofi Pharmaceuticals, for studies unrelated to this response.

References

  • 1. Malik VS. Non-sugar sweeteners and health. BMJ 2019;364:k5005. 10.1136/bmj.k5005   [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Toews I, Lohner S, Küllenberg de Gaudry D, Sommer H, Meerpohl JJ. Association between intake of non-sugar sweeteners and health outcomes: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised and non-randomised controlled trials and observational studies. BMJ 2019;364:k4718. 10.1136/bmj.k4718   [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Sylvetsky AC, Jin Y, Clark EJ, Welsh JA, Rother KI, Talegawkar SA. Consumption of low-calorie sweeteners among children and adults in the United States. J Acad Nutr Diet 2017;117:441-8.e2. 10.1016/j.jand.2016.11.004   [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Bobowski N, Mennella JA. Personal variation in preference for sweetness: effects of age and obesity. Child Obes 2017;13:369-76. 10.1089/chi.2017.0023   [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Miao S, Beach ES, Sommer TJ, Zimmerman JB, Jordt SE. High-intensity sweeteners in alternative tobacco products. Nicotine Tob Res 2016;18:2169-73. 10.1093/ntr/ntw141   [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Erythropel HC, Kong G, deWinter TM, et al. Presence of high-intensity sweeteners in popular cigarillos of varying flavor profiles. JAMA 2018;320:1380-3. 10.1001/jama.2018.11187   [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Mennella JA, Bobowski NK. The sweetness and bitterness of childhood: insights from basic research on taste preferences. Physiol Behav 2015;152(Pt B):502-7. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.05.015   [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The BMJ are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES