Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2019 Dec 3;9:18146. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-53930-8

Diel and tidal pCO2 × O2 fluctuations provide physiological refuge to early life stages of a coastal forage fish

Emma L Cross 1,, Christopher S Murray 1, Hannes Baumann 1
PMCID: PMC6890771  PMID: 31796762

Abstract

Coastal ecosystems experience substantial natural fluctuations in pCO2 and dissolved oxygen (DO) conditions on diel, tidal, seasonal and interannual timescales. Rising carbon dioxide emissions and anthropogenic nutrient input are expected to increase these pCO2 and DO cycles in severity and duration of acidification and hypoxia. How coastal marine organisms respond to natural pCO2 × DO variability and future climate change remains largely unknown. Here, we assess the impact of static and cycling pCO2 × DO conditions of various magnitudes and frequencies on early life survival and growth of an important coastal forage fish, Menidia menidia. Static low DO conditions severely decreased embryo survival, larval survival, time to 50% hatch, size at hatch and post-larval growth rates. Static elevated pCO2 did not affect most response traits, however, a synergistic negative effect did occur on embryo survival under hypoxic conditions (3.0 mg L−1). Cycling pCO2 × DO, however, reduced these negative effects of static conditions on all response traits with the magnitude of fluctuations influencing the extent of this reduction. This indicates that fluctuations in pCO2 and DO may benefit coastal organisms by providing periodic physiological refuge from stressful conditions, which could promote species adaptability to climate change.

Subject terms: Climate-change ecology, Evolutionary ecology, Marine biology, Marine biology, Climate-change ecology

Introduction

Rising anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions are acidifying and warming our oceans at an unprecedented rate13. Current understanding of biological responses to ocean acidification is largely based on experimental exposures to static conditions that are projected to occur over centuries in the average surface ocean (400–2,200 μatm)3. Most marine species, however, spend all or parts of their life in coastal environments4, where upwelling, riverine input, nutrient loading and higher biological productivity cause generally higher and more variable pCO2 levels510. In addition, nutrient pollution increasing primary production and microbial respiration often exacerbates acidification and loss of dissolved oxygen (DO) in coastal habitats11,12. Hence, upwelling regions already periodically experience 2,200 μatm13 while some nearshore coastal habitats (e.g. saltmarshes and mangrove lagoons) can temporarily reach 4,500 μatm due to diel fluctuations in community metabolism14. These pCO2 and DO fluctuations occur on tidal, diel, seasonal and interannual time scales15. In well mixed coastal zones, tidal and diel fluctuations are primarily driven by changes in net ecosystem metabolism from net autotrophy during the day (low pCO2, high DO), to net heterotrophy during the night (high pCO2, low DO)12,14,16. Seasonal fluctuations in temperature and stratification often elevate pCO2 and decrease DO conditions during the biologically most productive summer months. As temperatures decrease, respiration rates decline and stratification is disrupted, causing pCO2 to decrease and DO levels to rise again. Under future climate change, these pCO2 × DO cycles are expected to increase in severity and duration of extreme conditions as absorption of atmospheric CO2 will reduce seawater buffering capacity while elevated temperatures will increase microbial respiration of organic matter8,12,17,18.

While organismal responses to hypoxia have been studied for decades revealing negative direct effects on survival, growth, physiology, behaviour and distributions of marine fish1922, potential impacts of ocean acidification on marine organisms have only in recent decades received increasing attention23,24. Similarly to hypoxia, negative eco-physiological and behavioural responses to projected pCO2 levels have been documented for a wide range of marine fish species25. However, combined impacts of acidification and hypoxia remain understudied, particularly with respect to pCO2 and DO fluctuations12. Initial research on marine fish suggested that low oxygen impacts dominate over elevated pCO22629, while others demonstrated more severe effects of the combination of acidification and hypoxia than the individual effect of each stressor30. Three previous studies have investigated the effects of acidification and hypoxia on the Atlantic silverside M. menidia27,29,30, an ecologically important forage fish along the east coast of North America31,32. This species is a valued fish model for climate sensitivity research due to its short life cycle, ease of access to wild populations and ease of experimental rearing allowing for decades of experimental expertise32. M. menidia deposits their embryos in shallow nearshore habitats33 which are commonly characterised by large fluctuations in pCO2 × DO levels. The Ocean Variability Hypothesis suggests that coastal species that experience large short-term pCO2 fluctuations could produce offspring that are tolerant of cycling conditions34. This further demonstrates the suitability of M. menidia as a model species for investigating the effects of fluctuating pCO2 × DO levels on coastal organisms. Early life survival and growth of M. menidia has previously been reported to decrease under low DO (2.5 mg L−1) but not low pH (pHT 7.4) under static conditions27. This trend of greater sensitivity to low oxygen compared to elevated pCO2 was also demonstrated in mortality and surface respiration of juvenile M. menidia under static conditions30 and diel pCO2 × DO cycling29. Early life stages are typically most vulnerable to environmental stressors, therefore, it is paramount to determine how diel and tidal cycles of pCO2 × DO affect fish early life stages in coastal environments. Fluctuations in these stressors could be beneficial by providing temporary physiological refuge from stressful conditions, or they may be detrimental by requiring constant physiological adjustments35,36.

To determine how fluctuations of pCO2 and dissolved oxygen (DO) affect fish early life survival and growth, we reared M. menidia embryos and larvae under static and cycling pCO2 × DO treatments in four separate experiments. Treatment conditions reflect current and predicted future pCO2 and DO conditions in metabolism-driven temperate estuaries12,14,15,17,37. Experiments one and two quantified individual and combined effects of static high pCO2 and low DO by crossing three static pCO2 conditions (“control pCO2” – 400 μatm, “intermediate pCO2” – 2,200 μatm and “extreme pCO2” – 4,500 μatm) with four static DO conditions (“normoxic” – 7.7 mg L−1, “reduced DO” – 4.0 mg L−1, “hypoxic” – 3.0 mg L−1 and “hypoxic” – 2.5 mg L−1; Table 1). This established our baseline understanding of multi-stressor effects on M. menidia early life stages. Experiments three and four assessed static, diel and tidal pCO2 × DO fluctuations of different amplitudes around three mean pCO2-DO levels (“control pCO2 – normoxic”; “intermediate pCO2 – reduced DO”; “extreme pCO2 – hypoxic”; Table 1). Three static treatments were contrasted with six cycling treatments of differing magnitudes (Table 1) and frequency (diel – 24 hours; tidal – 12 hours). All four experiments quantified five fitness-relevant early life history traits: time to 50% hatch, embryo survival, larval survival, size at hatch and larval growth rates.

Table 1.

pCO2 × DO conditions for all static and fluctuating treatments in each mean pCO2-DO level.

Mean pCO2-DO level Cycling Pattern Treatment abbreviation Experiment pCO2 (μatm) DO (mg L−1)
Control pCO2-Normoxic Static Control-Static 1, 2, 3, 4 387 ± 21 7.7 ± 0.2
Control pCO2-Reduced DO Static Control-Red 1, 2 472 ± 36 4.2 ± 0.4
Control pCO2-Hypoxic Static Control-Hyp 1 400 ± 1 2.6 ± 0.4
2 520 ± 5 3.3 ± 0.7
Intermediate pCO2-Normoxic Static Intermediate-Norm 1, 2 2000 ± 190 7.7 ± 0.1
Intermediate pCO2-Reduced DO Static Intermediate-Static 1, 2, 3, 4 2309 ± 117 4.1 ± 0.4
Small Diel Fluctuation Intermediate-SDF 3 1166–4953 2.3–6.0
4 876–3059 4.0–6.6
Large Diel Fluctuation Intermediate-LDF 3 521–9926 1.4–6.2
4 747–8810 3.0–6.1
Tidal Fluctuation Intermediate-TF 3 699–8667 1.6–6.1
4 948–9277 3.0–6.6
Intermediate pCO2-Hypoxic Static Intermediate-Hyp 1 2189 ± 4 2.6 ± 0.4
2 2151 ± 19 3.1 ± 0.4
Extreme pCO2-Normoxic Static Extreme-Norm 1, 2 4454 ± 101 7.7 ± 0.1
Extreme pCO2-Reduced DO Static Extreme-Red 1, 2 4315 ± 216 4.1 ± 0.4
Extreme pCO2-Hypoxic Static Extreme-Static 1, 3 4681 ± 473 2.5 ± 0.4
2, 4 4579 ± 217 3.1 ± 0.4
Small Diel Fluctuation Extreme-SDF 3 1872–9590 1.9–4.2
4 2341–6490 3.0–5.2
Large Diel Fluctuation Extreme-LDF 3 1058–15970 1.1–5.3
4 1258–12624 2.6–5.7
Tidal Fluctuation Extreme-TF 3 1349–17013 1.6–5.0
4 1515–11658 2.7–5.9

Values are mean ± S.D. for static treatments or ranges for fluctuating treatments.

Results

Experiments one and two: static pH × DO experiments

Time to 50% hatch was shortest under normoxic conditions with 50% of larvae hatched after 6 days post fertilisation (dpf). Hatching was delayed to 7 dpf in 4.0 mg L−1, 8 dpf in 3.0 mg L−1 and 9 dpf in 2.5 mg L−1 (Fig. 1). Elevated pCO2 did not impact hatch timing. Declining DO significantly reduced embryo survival (Linear mixed effects model, χ2 = 84.79, p < 0.001; Fig. 2E,F). Declining DO conditions decreased embryo survival from 84 ± 3% S.E. in 7.7 mg L−1 to 74 ± 4% S.E. in 4.0 mg L−1, 65 ± 5% S.E. in 3.0 mg L−1 and 32 ± 2% S.E. in 2.5 mg L−1 across experiments. Elevated pCO2 levels only impacted embryo survival at 3.0 mg L−1 with a 37% decrease at 2,200 μatm (Tukey, p < 0.001) and a 19% decrease at 4,500 μatm (Tukey, p = 0.006; Fig. 2F) relative to 400 μatm. Larval survival, size of newly hatched larvae and post-hatch growth rates decreased with declining DO but were statistically unaffected by pCO2 (Table 2; Table S1, Fig. 2G–L).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Cumulative hatching success (%) of M. menidia offspring reared at three static pCO2 levels (see legend) crossed with four DO concentrations (L-R: 2.5 mg L−1, 3.0 mg L−1, 4.0 mg L−1 and 7.5 mg L−1). Lines represent treatment means pooled from both experiments. Crosses indicate 50% of larvae hatched in treatment.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Effects of static pCO2×DO conditions on survival and growth of early life M. menidia. Schematics of static DO (normoxic, reduced DO and hypoxic; A,B) and pCO2 (control, intermediate and extreme; C,D) conditions from nine treatments in each experiment. Embryo survival (%; E,F), larval survival (%; G,H), hatch length (mm; I,J) and growth rate (mm day−1; K,L) from M. menidia offspring reared under three static pCO2 levels crossed with four static DO concentrations from experiments one (left column) and two (right column). Values are treatment means ± S.E. Different lowercase letters represent significant interactions of pCO2 and DO conditions.

Table 2.

Overview of static and fluctuating pCO2 × DO effects on M. menidia offspring survival and growth. Green symbols = experiments one & two; purple symbols = experiment three; orange symbols = experiment four. Crosses = statistically unaffected response trait; arrows = increase/decrease in response trait.

Response traits Experiments one & two: static pCO2 × DO experiments Experiments three & four: fluctuating pCO2 × DO experiments
Increased pCO2 effect Decreased DO effect Increased pCO2 × decreased DO effect Static mean pCO2-DO level effect Fluctuating pCO2 × DO effect
Intermediate level Extreme level
Time to 50% hatch graphic file with name 41598_2019_53930_Figa_HTML.gif graphic file with name 41598_2019_53930_Figb_HTML.gif graphic file with name 41598_2019_53930_Figc_HTML.gif graphic file with name 41598_2019_53930_Figd_HTML.gif graphic file with name 41598_2019_53930_Fige_HTML.gif graphic file with name 41598_2019_53930_Figf_HTML.gif
Embryo survival graphic file with name 41598_2019_53930_Figg_HTML.gif graphic file with name 41598_2019_53930_Figh_HTML.gif graphic file with name 41598_2019_53930_Figi_HTML.gif graphic file with name 41598_2019_53930_Figj_HTML.gif graphic file with name 41598_2019_53930_Figk_HTML.gif graphic file with name 41598_2019_53930_Figl_HTML.gif
Larval survival graphic file with name 41598_2019_53930_Figm_HTML.gif graphic file with name 41598_2019_53930_Fign_HTML.gif graphic file with name 41598_2019_53930_Figo_HTML.gif graphic file with name 41598_2019_53930_Figp_HTML.gif graphic file with name 41598_2019_53930_Figq_HTML.gif graphic file with name 41598_2019_53930_Figr_HTML.gif
Size at hatch graphic file with name 41598_2019_53930_Figs_HTML.gif graphic file with name 41598_2019_53930_Figt_HTML.gif graphic file with name 41598_2019_53930_Figu_HTML.gif graphic file with name 41598_2019_53930_Figv_HTML.gif graphic file with name 41598_2019_53930_Figw_HTML.gif graphic file with name 41598_2019_53930_Figx_HTML.gif
Post-hatch growth rates graphic file with name 41598_2019_53930_Figy_HTML.gif graphic file with name 41598_2019_53930_Figz_HTML.gif graphic file with name 41598_2019_53930_Figaa_HTML.gif graphic file with name 41598_2019_53930_Figab_HTML.gif graphic file with name 41598_2019_53930_Figac_HTML.gif graphic file with name 41598_2019_53930_Figad_HTML.gif

Experiments three and four: Fluctuating pCO2 × DO experiments

Experiment three

Time to 50% hatch was shortest in control conditions with 50% of larvae hatched by 6 dpf. Hatching was delayed to 7 dpf in all intermediate pCO2-reduced DO treatments with cycling pattern having no effect (Fig. 3). No hatching occurred in the extreme-static treatment, however, hatching was delayed to 9 dpf in the extreme-LDF and extreme-TF and further delayed to 10 dpf in the extreme-SDF treatment (Fig. 3). In the static treatments, embryo survival was significantly reduced in extreme pCO2-hypoxic conditions compared to the intermediate pCO2-reduced DO and control pCO2-normoxic conditions (Linear model, F2,11 = 212.77, p < 0.001; Fig. 4E). Cycling treatments increased embryo survival in the extreme pCO2-hypoxic level with the highest survival occurring in the extreme-LDF (Fig. 4E; Table S2; Tukey, p < 0.001). Cycling pattern in the intermediate pCO2-reduced DO level, however, did not affect embryo survival (Tukey, p = 0.270). Similarly, larval survival, mean size of newly hatched larvae and post-hatch growth rates all decreased with increasing pCO2 and declining DO conditions in the static treatments (Table S2) with cycling pattern having no effect (Table 2; Table S3; Fig. 4G,I,K). Larval survival was low (<14%) or 0% in all intermediate pCO2-reduced DO and extreme pCO2-hypoxic treatments, respectively, after only 6 days post hatch (dph) and embryo survival was too low (<10%) to obtain size at hatch measurements in the extreme-static and extreme-SDF treatments. Complete larval mortality precluded estimation of growth rates for all extreme pCO2-hypoxic treatments. These trends were probably due to the daily minimum DO values in all intermediate pCO2-reduced DO and extreme pCO2-hypoxic treatments being below the oxygen tolerance limit of M. menidia (<3.0 mg L−1; Table 1).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Cumulative hatch success (%) of M. menidia offspring reared in static and fluctuating pCO2 × DO conditions (see legend) under control pCO2–normoxic (left column), intermediate pCO2–reduced DO (middle column) and extreme pCO2–hypoxic levels (right column) across experiment three (top row) and experiment four (bottom row). Lines represent treatment mean and crosses indicate 50% of larvae hatched in treatment.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Effects of static vs. fluctuating pCO2 × DO conditions on survival and growth of early life M. menidia. Schematics of DO (A,B) and pCO2 (C,D) conditions over a 24 hour period from three static and six cycling treatments of different magnitudes and frequencies (small diel fluctuation, large diel fluctuation, tidal fluctuation) in the three mean pCO2-DO levels (see legend). Embryo survival (%; E,F), larval survival (%; G,H), hatch length (mm; I,J) and growth rate (mm day−1; K,L) from M. menidia offspring reared in different pCO2 × DO cycling patterns from experiment three (left column) and four (right column). Values are treatment means (±S.E.). Different lowercase letters represent significant differences between cycling patterns within the intermediate pCO2–reduced DO level (a–c; blue diamonds) and within the extreme pCO2–hypoxic level (d–f; red squares).

Experiment four

In the static treatments, time to 50% hatch was shortest under control conditions with 50% of larvae hatched by 6 dpf, which was delayed in intermediate pCO2-reduced DO conditions to 8 dpf and further delayed to 9 dpf in extreme pCO2-hypoxic conditions (Fig. 3). Cycling treatments, however, shortened time to 50% hatched in both levels. In the intermediate pCO2-reduced DO level, time to 50% hatch was shortened to 7 dpf in the LDF and TF and further shortened to 6 dpf in the SDF treatment (Fig. 3). In the extreme pCO2-hypoxic level, time to 50% hatch was shortened to 7 dpf in the SDF and TF and further shortened to 6 dpf in the LDF treatment (Fig. 3). In the static treatments, all response traits decreased with increasing pCO2 and declining DO conditions (Table 2; Table S3) with all cycling treatments alleviating these negative effects (Tables 2 and S4; Fig. 4F,H,J,L). In the intermediate pCO2-reduced DO level, highest embryo survival, largest mean hatch length and fastest growth rates occurred in the SDF treatment. In the extreme pCO2-hypoxic level, however, all response traits were highest in the LDF. There was also no significant difference between LDF and TF in the majority of response traits in both levels (Fig. 4F,H,J,L).

Discussion

By simulating both static and fluctuating pCO2 × DO environments, this study advanced our previous understanding on how both stressors affect early life stages27 of an ecologically important forage fish and model in climate sensitivity research32. While our static 3 × 3 designs (experiments one and two) improved quantification of baseline reaction norms over previous 2 × 2 approaches27, our findings for fluctuating conditions – as they naturally occur in nearshore habitats – shed new light on whether such fluctuations are detrimental or beneficial to marine organisms. First, when exposed to static pCO2 × DO conditions, survival and growth of early life M. menidia were more sensitive to reduced DO than elevated pCO2. Both embryo and larval survival severely declined with decreasing DO and resulted in complete offspring mortality at 2.5 mg L−1. However, even DO levels of 4.0 mg L−1, which are above the operational hypoxia threshold and periodically already occur in productive nearshore habitats14,15, significantly reduced offspring survival in this species. Declining DO levels also delayed hatching, reduced hatch size and post-hatch growth rates. In contrast, elevated pCO2 did not affect most response traits under reduced DO and normoxic conditions. At 3.0 mg L−1 DO, however, embryo survival decreased by 33% at 2,200 μatm and by 15% under 4,500 μatm relative to controls. These findings in M. menidia ealry life stages are similar to previous studies that documented negative pCO2 × DO survival effects in M. menidia larvae and juveniles27,30. Low DO and high pCO2 may elicit fatal effects in this species, possibly due to decreased functional capacity of pH-sensitive tissues and/or additional metabolic costs for acid-base regulation12,3840, however, this warrants further investigation.

The second part of this study demonstrated that diel and tidal pCO2 × DO fluctuations reduced the negative survival and growth responses observed under static pCO2/DO conditions. At each mean pCO2-DO level, higher embryo and larval survival, shorter time to 50% hatch, larger size at hatch and faster post-hatch growth rates occurred in all cycling treatments relative to the static treatment. Fluctuating conditions therefore comprised a physiological refuge to early life M. menidia allowing temporary recovery from detrimental pCO2 and DO levels when conditions oscillated to more favourable conditions36. A recent review on the direct impacts of pCO2 variability on biological responses revealed that out of 24 observations (eight published papers26,28,29,4145) on fish survival, growth, respiration, behaviour and otolith development46, five were positive, one negative and 18 were neutral. Consistent with our study, diel pCO2 fluctuations reduced negative impacts of static pCO2 conditions on larval growth in pink salmon, Oncorhynchus gorbuscha47 and on juvenile growth and behavioural responses in coral reef fishes Acanthochromis polyacanthus and Amphiprion percula42,44. Static elevated pCO2 conditions can alter aerobic capacity in some fish25,47,48 possibly due to increased metabolic costs regulating acid-base balance4951. A diel pCO2 cycling environment could be less energetically expensive than static elevated pCO2 environments as the cost of acid-base regulation decreases during more favourable conditions in the diel cycle. Aerobic scope is thus increased for other fitness-relevant traits such as growth and other physiological mechanisms44. Neutral survival, growth and/or behavioural responses to pCO2/DO cycling have occurred in juvenile estuarine weakfish Cynoscion regalis28 and in juvenile striped killifish Fundulus majalis, mummichog Fundulus heteroclitus, striped bass Morone saxatilis and the Atlantic silverside M. menidia29. Reported negative responses to large diel cycling in pH, which varies with pCO2, and DO (pH 6.80–8.10, 1.0–11.0 mg L−1 DO) include decreased growth after 10 days exposure in juvenile summer flounder Paralichthys dentatus with >90% mortality occurring after 2–3 weeks exposure26. These trends demonstrate species-specific responses to fluctuating pCO2 × DO conditions with some species capable of maintaining physiological homeostasis whereas others require constant physiological adjustments to changing environmental conditions leading to detrimental impacts.

The degree to which pCO2/DO fluctuations ameliorated the negative effects observed under static conditions depended on the magnitude but not on the frequency of these fluctuations. At the intermediate pCO2-reduced DO level, small diel fluctuations best improved all response traits, potentially because offspring did not experience the most extreme pCO2-hypoxic conditions (daily min. 4.0 mg L−1, daily max. 3,059 μatm; Table 1) that temporarily occurred in the two other cycling treatments (LDF daily min. 3.0 mg L−1, daily max. 8,810 μatm; TF daily min.: 3.2 mg L−1, 9,277 μatm; Table 1). The pCO2/DO conditions in the intermediate-SDF are also the most similar to late spring/early summer conditions in the Atlantic silverside spawning habitat14. Similarly, small diel pCO2 fluctuations (1,000 ± 300 μatm), that typically occur in the coral reef fish habitats best ameliorated the negative survival and growth effects observed under static pCO2 conditions in Acanthochromis polyacanthus44. In contrast, large diel fluctuations at the extreme pCO2-hypoxic level had the greatest reduction in the negative effects of static pCO2 × DO conditions on all response traits. These offspring experienced more optimal pCO2 × DO conditions (<2,000 μatm, >5.2 mg L−1; Table 1) for short time periods every 24 hours whereas offspring reared in the extreme-SDF treatment were constrained to higher pCO2 and lower DO levels (2,341–6,490 μatm, 3.0–5.2 mg L−1; Table 1). All response traits also did not differ between large diel fluctuations and tidal fluctuations in both mean pCO2-DO levels demonstrating that magnitude of fluctuations influenced biological responses more than the frequency of oscillations. Duration of exposure to hypoxic DO conditions (<3.0 mg L−1) also influenced the severity of negative impacts on all response traits. In experiment three, complete larval mortality occurred in all extreme pCO2-hypoxic treatments after only 6 days post hatch, whereas in experiment four 38% and 51% of larvae survived to 10 dph in extreme-LDF and extreme-TF treatments, respectively, likely because minimum DO levels were increased by 1.0 mg L−1. This suggests that even though average DO levels in the extreme-LDF and extreme-TF treatments were around 6.0 mg L−1, the occurrence of DO conditions below 3.0 mg L−1 for 10 hours per day (experiment three) compared to only 3 hours in experiment four, proved fatal for Atlantic silverside offspring.

Embryos appeared to be more resilient to low DO conditions under static and fluctuating regimes than larvae. Acclimation to hypoxia in embryos most likely occurs through reducing their oxygen requirements by depressing metabolic rates52. Decreased size at hatch with declining static DO conditions indicated embryonic metabolic depression. Under fluctuating conditions, metabolic rates most likely increased as their environment oscillated to more optimal DO conditions, elevating oxygen uptake and producing a larger size at hatch relative to their static treatment. Atlantic silverside embryos attach to benthic vegetation in shallow coastal environments33, therefore, this apparent hypoxia tolerance may be an adaptation to periodic hypoxia that typically occurs in the summer months in their spawning habitat. Lower larval survival, however, suggests that this next life stage cannot depress metabolism to counteract declining oxygen supply once feeding and swimming commences. We observed that larvae in static low DO conditions and in fluctuating treatments during periods of DO levels below 4.0 mg L−1 were constrained to the immediate surface waters where higher DO conditions persist at the air-water interface. Aquatic surface respiration is a compensatory behaviour exhibited by some fishes to hypoxia, which has previously been reported in M. menidia juveniles under extreme static low DO conditions30 and larvae reared in fluctuating conditions when DO is <1.6 mg L−1 29. In nature, this behaviour likely increases predation risk and reduces foraging ability of developing larvae29.

This study confirmed M. menidia offspring survival and growth to be more sensitive to reduced DO than elevated pCO2 under static treatments. Diel and tidal cycling of pCO2/DO, however, ameliorated these negative effects of static elevated pCO2 and decreased DO conditions. Furthermore, the extent of alleviation was influenced by the mean pCO2-DO level and the magnitude of fluctuation. To date, most ocean acidification experiments have been conducted using static elevated pCO2 conditions based on open ocean projections, however, shallow coastal environments experience substantial fluctuations in pCO2 as well as DO on tidal, daily, seasonal and interannual time scales14,15. Here we utilised a computer-controlled pCO2/DO-manipulation system to alter pCO2 and DO conditions every hour to incrementally increase or decrease pCO2 and DO on varying magnitudes and frequencies around an intermediate mean pCO2-DO level, mimicking common conditions during late spring and summer in coastal systems, and an extreme pCO2-DO level, simulating potential future conditions during late spring and summer with increased eutrophication and climate change. This revealed that fluctuating pCO2/DO conditions provide physiological refuge to M. menidia early life stages indicating that the effects of future acidification and hypoxia may be less severe than experiments using static pCO2/DO conditions have implied27,29,30. This is consistent with the Ocean Variability Hypothesis that suggests the most pCO2 tolerant marine organisms are those that experience large short-term pCO2 fluctuations in their natural environment34. Fluctuating pCO2 × DO environments could promote species adaptability to long-term change, therefore, incorporating natural pCO2/DO variability to multi-stressor experiments is crucial to more accurately assess the effects of anthropogenic change on coastal marine organisms.

Material and Methods

Specimen collection and fertilisation

Wild, spawning ripe Atlantic silversides were collected on four occasions in late spring and early summer in 2017 (8th May and 8th June) and 2018 (14th May and 14th June) from Mumford Cove (41° 32′27′ N, 72° 1.59′ W), a shallow embayment in Long Island Sound, Connecticut, USA. Adults were sampled using a 30 × 2 m beach seine with a 3 mm mesh size at high tide during new moon or full moon due to the semilunar spawning periodicity of M. menidia. For each experiment, 12–28 females were strip spawned with their eggs evenly distributed onto 1 mm mesh size window screens submerged in seawater. Milt from 23–39 males was mixed with 500 mL of seawater, carefully poured into the spawning dishes and left to fertilise the eggs for 30 minutes. Chorionic filaments in the embryos uncoil once fertilised and attach to the window screen, allowing accurate enumeration of 100 fertilised embryos into each replicate rearing container within 2 hours of fertilisation. Numbers and total lengths of spawners used in each experiment are in Table S4. This standardised strip-spawning protocol allowed the random distribution of embryos across treatments and maximised fertilisation success41,5355.

Experimental design

All four experiments were separately conducted in a computer-controlled pCO2/DO-manipulation system composed of nine individual recirculation units as detailed elsewhere53. UV-sterilised and 1μm-filtered natural seawater was used in each recirculating unit, which consisted of a 40L header tank, a 240L experimental tank and a 90L sump tank. Five replicate 20L rearing containers were used in each experimental tank. Every hour, pH and DO levels were manipulated using LabView (National Instruments) software to control sampling pumps and water solenoids for each recirculating unit to sequentially pump seawater for 7 minutes past a central pH electrode (Hach pHD Digital Electrode calibrated twice weekly using NIST 2-point pH buffers) and an optical dissolved oxygen (DO) probe (Hach LDO Model 2). Measured pH and DO conditions were then compared to pre-determined levels for each hour and adjusted by injecting 100% bone dry CO2 gas (AirGas) into the header tank, nitrogen gas (AirGas) into the sump or CO2-stripped air into the sump via different gas solenoids. Temperature was maintained by thermostats (Aqualogic) connected to submersible heaters and chillers (DeltaStar). Optimal temperatures (24 °C), light conditions (15 h light: 9 h dark) and salinity (30–33 psu) persisted throughout experiments31. LabView logged measured and set pH, DO and temperature conditions hourly for each recirculation unit. Daily checks of salinity (Refractometer) and water quality (Saltwater Ammonia Test Kit, API, <0.25 ppm) were conducted and maintained through daily waste siphoning and 25% water changes.

To determine the carbonate chemistry of each treatment, seawater samples were collected in 300 mL borosilicate bottles by siphoning seawater from each experimental tank through a 10 μm filter at three time points throughout each experiment. These samples were stored in 4 °C with total alkalinity (AT) later measured via endpoint titration (Mettler Toledo G20 Potentiometric Titrator). Accuracy of measurements (±1%) was verified with certified reference material for AT in seawater (Dr. Andrew Dickson, University of California San Diego, Scripps Institution of Oceanography). Partial pressure of CO2 (pCO2, μatm) was calculated using CO2SYS (https://cdiac.ess-dive.lbl.gov/ftp/co2sys/) based on measured daily average, minimum and maximum pHNIST and experiment averages of AT, temperature and salinity using K1 and K2 constants5658 (Tables S5, S6 and S7).

Experimental pCO2 and DO conditions

Treatment conditions reflect current and predicted future pCO2 and DO conditions in metabolism-driven temperate estuaries12,14,15,17,37. The pCO2 target for the control treatment was 400 μatm corresponding to current conditions in coastal habitats before the onset of biological production in spring. The target for the intermediate level was 2,200 μatm, resembling common conditions during late spring and summer in coastal systems and also an important benchmark in ocean acidification research as the maximum prediction within the next 300 years1. The pCO2 target for the extreme treatment is 4,500 μatm, which although currently uncommon in coastal habitats, it represents potential future conditions during late spring and summer with increased eutrophication and climate change17,37. The target DO levels were determined from long-term monitoring of co-varying pH and DO variations in coastal systems14 and set as 7.5 mg L−1 (normoxic, ~100% saturation), 4.0 mg L−1 (reduced DO, ~ 55% saturation) and 2.5 mg L−1 (hypoxic, ~33% saturation, experiment one), respectively. The extreme DO level in experiment two was raised to 3.0 mg L−1 (hypoxic, ~42% saturation) to avoid complete mortality exhibited in experiment one. Fish in experiments one and two were reared in these conditions as static levels using a full factorial 3 pH × 3 DO design (Fig. 2A–D). Fish in experiment three were reared in these conditions as target means with levels fluctuating with different amplitudes (Table S6) and two different frequencies (diel – 24 hours, tidal – 12 hours; Fig. 4A–D). In experiment four, the daily maximum pCO2 were decreased by 2,000 μatm and the daily minimum DO levels were increased by 1.0 mg L−1, therefore, slightly reducing the three different amplitudes (Table S7) to avoid complete larval mortality observed in the extreme level in experiment three.

Response traits

Five response traits were measured to determine the effects of static and fluctuating pCO2 and DO conditions on the survival and growth of early life stages of the Atlantic silverside. After 5 days post fertilisation (dpf), embryos were checked every 12 hours for hatched larvae, which were counted and moved from the embryo baskets to the main rearing container. Time to 50% hatch was determined as the number of days until 50% of the total larvae hatched in each treatment since the day of fertilisation. Embryo survival (%) was quantified as the total number of one-day post-hatch larvae divided by the initial number of 100 embryos. To measure hatch length (total length, TL, ±0.01 mm), a random sub-sample of 10 larvae on the first day of hatching were preserved in 5% formaldehyde in freshwater solution buffered with saturated sodium tetraborate and later measured using Image Pro Premier (V9.0, Media Cybernetics). Newly hatched larvae were provided with equal rations of powdered weaning diet (Otohime Marine Fish Diet, size A1, Reed Mariculture) to stimulate feeding. Larvae were also fed daily with ad libitum rations of newly hatched brine shrimp nauplii (Artemia salina, brineshrimpdirect.com). Larval survival (%) was quantified as the number of survivors at 10 or 15 dph divided by the number of survivors at hatch minus 10 initial sub-samples. To calculate growth rate, final TL of all survivors at the end of the experiment was measured using Image Pro and the following equation:

Growthrate=meanfinalTLmeanhatchTLnumberofdaysrearedposthatch

Statistical analysis

For experiments one and two, linear mixed effects models were conducted to determine significant effects of static pCO2, static DO or their interaction (fixed factors) and experiment (random factor) for each response trait using the following model:

Responsetrait=pCO2+DO+pCO2xDO+experiment+error

Post-hoc Tukey tests were used for pairwise comparisons. For response traits exhibiting significant differences between experiments, further linear models using only the fixed factors and Tukey tests were conducted for each experiment.

As experiments three and four were not fully crossed (no fluctuating treatments around control conditions), linear models were first used to determine significant differences of mean pCO2-DO level (control pCO2-normoxic, intermediate pCO2-reduced DO or extreme pCO2-hypoxic) of only static treatments on each response trait. Further linear models were then conducted to determine significant differences of mean pCO2-DO level (intermediate pCO2-reduced DO or extreme pCO2-hypoxic), cycling pattern (static, small diel fluctuation, large diel fluctuation or tidal fluctuation), or their interaction for each response trait using the following model:

Responsetrait=level+cyclingpattern+levelxcyclingpattern+error

Post-hoc Tukey tests were performed when significant differences were identified. Residuals of all models were checked for variance homogeneity and normality using Levene’s and Shapiro-Wilk tests (p < 0.05), respectively. No statistics were performed on the time to 50% hatch data. Statistical analyses were computed using RStudio59 with the lme4 package60 for linear mixed effects models and the emmeans package61 for the post-hoc Tukey tests.

Ethics

Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) guidelines on fish husbandry were used and all experiments were approved by IACUC of the University of Connecticut (no. A14-032, A17-043).

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (146.7KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to C. Woods, J. Pringle, J. Snyder, J. Harrington, C. Dyke, I. Mayo, C. Concannon and S. Stark for laboratory assistance and to L. Jones for conducting larval measurements of experiments one and two. We are also grateful to C. Matassa and W. Huffman for statistical analysis support. This research was funded through a National Science Foundation grant to H.B. (NSF-OCE 1536165).

Author contributions

All authors designed the experiment. C.S.M. performed experiments one and two. E.L.C. performed experiments three and four and all the statistical analysis. E.L.C. wrote the manuscript with input from H.B and C.S.M.

Data availability

Datasets are publicly available from the BCO-DMO data portal via the following DOIs: survival dataset - 10.1575/1912/bco-dmo.777117.1, growth dataset - 10.1575/1912/bco-dmo.777130.1 and carbonate chemistry dataset - 10.1575/1912/bco-dmo.777144.1.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41598-019-53930-8.

References

  • 1.Caldeira K, Wickett ME. Ocean model predictions of chemistry changes from carbon dioxide emissions to the atmosphere and ocean. J. Geophys. Res. 2005;110:C09S04. doi: 10.1029/2004jc002671. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.IPCC. In Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds. Stocker, T. F. et al.) 1552 (Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 2013).
  • 3.Doney SC, Fabry VJ, Feely RA, Kleypas JA. Ocean acidification: the other CO2 problem. Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci. 2009;1:169–192. doi: 10.1146/annurev.marine.010908.163834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Constanza R, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature. 1997;387:253–260. doi: 10.1038/387253a0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Duarte CM, Losada IJ, Hendriks IE, Mazarrasa I, Marbà N. The role of coastal plant communities for climate change mitigation and adaptation. Nature Clim. Change. 2013;3:961–968. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1970. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hofmann GE, et al. High-frequency dynamics of ocean pH: A multi-ecosystem comparison. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e28983. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fabry VJ, Seibel BA, Feely RA, Orr JC. Impacts of ocean acidification on marine fauna and ecosystem processes. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2008;65:414–432. doi: 10.1093/icesjms/fsn048. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Melzner F, et al. Future ocean acidification will be amplified by hypoxia in coastal habitats. Mar. Biol. 2013;160:1875–1888. doi: 10.1007/s00227-012-1954-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wootton JT, Pfister CA, Forester JD. Dynamic patterns and ecological impacts of declining ocean pH in a high- esolution multi-year dataset. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2008;105:18848–18853. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0810079105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Feely RA, et al. The combined effects of ocean acidification, mixing, and respiration on pH and carbonate saturation in an urbanized estuary. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2010;88:442–449. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2010.05.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cloern JE, et al. Human activities and climate variability drive fast-paced change across the world’s estuarine-coastal ecosystems. Glob. Change Biol. 2016;22:513–529. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gobler Christopher J., Baumann Hannes. Hypoxia and acidification in ocean ecosystems: coupled dynamics and effects on marine life. Biology Letters. 2016;12(5):20150976. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Feely RA, Sabine CL, Hernandez-Ayon M, Ianson D, Hales B. Evidence for upwelling of corrosive “acidified” water onto the continental shelf. Science. 2008;320:1490–1492. doi: 10.1126/science.1155676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Baumann H, Wallace RB, Tagliaferri T, Gobler CJ. Large natural pH, CO2 and O2 fluctuations in a temperate tidal salt marsh on diel, seasonal, and interannual time scales. Estuaries Coasts. 2015;38:220–231. doi: 10.1007/s12237-014-9800-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Baumann H, Smith EM. Quantifying metabolically driven pH and oxygen fluctuations in US nearshore habitats at diel to interannual time scales. Estuaries Coasts. 2017;41:1102–1117. doi: 10.1007/s12237-017-0321-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Waldbusser GG, Salisbury JE. Ocean acidification in the coastal zone from an organism’s perspective: multiple system parameters, frequency domains, and habitats. Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci. 2014;6:221–247. doi: 10.1146/annurev-marine-121211-172238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pacella SR, Brown CA, Waldbusser GG, Labiosa RG, Hales B. Seagrass habitat metabolism increases short-term extremes and long-term offset of CO2 under future ocean acidification. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2018;115:3870–3875. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1703445115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.McNeil BI, Sasse TP. Future ocean hypercapnia driven by anthropogenic amplification of the natural CO2 cycle. Nature. 2016;529:383–386. doi: 10.1038/nature16156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Burnett LE. The challenges of living in hypoxic and hypercapnic aquatic environments. Am. Zool. 1997;37:633–640. doi: 10.1093/icb/37.6.633. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Fritsche R. Effects of hypoxia on blood pressure and heart rate in three marine teleosts. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 1990;8:85–92. doi: 10.1007/BF00004435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Breitburg D. Effects of hypoxia, and the balance between hypoxia and enrichment, on coastal fishes and fisheries. Estuaries. 2002;25:767–781. doi: 10.1007/BF02804904. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lucon-Xiccato T, et al. Severe hypoxia impairs lateralization in a marine teleost fish. J. Exp. Biol. 2014;217:4115–4118. doi: 10.1242/jeb.111229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kroeker KJ, et al. Impacts of ocean acidification on marine organisms: quantifying sensitivities and interaction with warming. Glob. Change Biol. 2013;19:1884–1896. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Riebesell U, Gattuso J-P. Lessons learned from ocean acidification research. Nature Clim. Change. 2015;5:12–14. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2456. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Cattano Carlo, Claudet Joachim, Domenici Paolo, Milazzo Marco. Living in a high CO2 world: a global meta-analysis shows multiple trait-mediated fish responses to ocean acidification. Ecological Monographs. 2018;88(3):320–335. doi: 10.1002/ecm.1297. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Davidson MI, Targett TE, Grecay PA. Evaluating the effects of diel-cycling hypoxia and pH on growth and survival of juvenile summer flounder Paralichthys dentatus. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2016;556:223–235. doi: 10.3354/meps11817. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.DePasquale E, Baumann H, Gobler CJ. Vulnerability of early life stage Northwest Atlantic forage fish to ocean acidification and low oxygen. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2015;523:145–156. doi: 10.3354/meps11142. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lifavi DM, Targett TE, Grecay PA. Effects of diel-cycling hypoxia and acidification on juvenile weakfish Cynoscion regalis growth, survival, and activity. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2017;564:163–174. doi: 10.3354/meps11966. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Dixon RL, Grecay PA, Targett TE. Responses of juvenile Atlantic silverside, striped killifish, mummichog, and striped bass to acute hypoxia and acidification: Aquatic surface respiration and survival. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2017;493:20–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jembe.2017.04.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Miller SH, Breitburg DL, Burrell RB, Keppel AG. Acidification increases sensitivity to hypoxia in important forage fishes. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2016;549:1–8. doi: 10.3354/meps11695. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Middaugh, D. P., Hemmer, M. J. & Goodman, L. Methods for Spawning, Culturing and Conducting Toxicity-Tests with Early Life Stages of four Atherinid Fishes: The Inland Silverside,’ Menidia beryllina, Atlantic silverside, M. menidia, Tidewater silverside, M. peninsulae and California grunion, Leuresthes tenuis; (ed. EPA) (Gulf Breeze, FL, USA, 1987).
  • 32.Baumann Hannes, Cross Emma L., Murray Chris S. Robust quantification of fish early life CO 2 sensitivities via serial experimentation. Biology Letters. 2018;14(11):20180408. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2018.0408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Conover DO, Ross MR. Patterns in seasonal abundance, growth and biomass of the Atlantic silverside, Menidia menidia, in a New England Estuary. Estuaries. 1982;5:275–286. doi: 10.2307/1351750. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Baumann H. Experimental assessments of marine species sensitivities to ocean acidification and co-stressors: how far have we come? Can. J. Zool. 2019;97:399–408. doi: 10.1139/cjz-2018-0198. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wittmann AC, Pörtner H. Sensitivities of extant animal taxa to ocean acidification. Nature Clim. Change. 2013;3:995–1001. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1982. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Frieder CA, Gonzalez JP, Bockmon EE, Navarro MO, Levin LA. Can variable pH and low oxygen moderate ocean acidification outcomes for mussel larvae? Glob. Change Biol. 2014;20:754–764. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wallace RB, Baumann H, Grear JS, Aller RC, Gobler CJ. Coastal ocean acidification: The other eutrophication problem. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2014;148:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2014.05.027. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Dahlke FT, et al. Northern cod species face spawning habitat losses if global warming exceeds 1.5 °C. Sci. Adv. 2018;4:eaas8821. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aas8821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Pörtner HO, Langenbuch M, Michaelidis B. Synergistic effects of temperature extremes, hypoxia, and increases in CO2 on marine animals: From Earth history to global change. J. Geophys. Res. 2005;110:C09S10. doi: 10.1029/2004jc002561. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Pörtner HO. Integrating climate-related stressor effects on marine organisms: unifying principles linking molecule to ecosystem-level changes. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2012;470:273–290. doi: 10.3354/meps10123. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Murray CS, Malvezzi A, Gobler CJ, Baumann H. Offspring sensitivity to ocean acidification changes seasonally in a coastal marine fish. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2014;504:1–11. doi: 10.3354/meps10791. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Jarrold MD, Humphrey C, McCormick MI, Munday PL, Diel CO2 cycles reduce severity of behavioural abnormalities in coral reef fish under ocean acidification. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:10153. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-10378-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Jarrold MD, Munday PL, Diel CO. cycles and parental effects have similar benefits to growth of a coral reef fish under ocean acidification. Biol. Lett. 2019;15:20180724. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2018.0724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Jarrold MD, Munday PL. Elevated temperature does not dubstantially modify the interactive effects between elevated CO2 and diel CO2 cycles on the survival, growth and behavior of a coral reef fish. Front. Mar. Sci. 2018;5:458. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2018.00458. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kwan Garfield Tsz, Hamilton Trevor James, Tresguerres Martin. CO 2 -induced ocean acidification does not affect individual or group behaviour in a temperate damselfish. Royal Society Open Science. 2017;4(7):170283. doi: 10.1098/rsos.170283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kapsenberg L, Cyronak T. Ocean acidification refugia in variable environments. Glob. Change Biol. 2019;25:3201–3214. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ou M, et al. Responses of pink salmon to CO2-induced aquatic acidification. Nature Clim. Change. 2015;5:950–955. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2694. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Munday PL, Crawley NE, Nilsson GE. Interacting effects of elevated temperature and ocean acidification on the aerobic performance of coral reef fishes. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2009;388:235–242. doi: 10.3354/meps08137. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Perry SF, Gilmour KM. Acid-base balance and CO2 excretion in fish: unanswered questions and emerging models. Resp. Physiol. Neurobi. 2006;154:199–215. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2006.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Esbaugh AJ. Physiological implications of ocean acidification for marine fish: emerging patterns and new insights. J. Comp. Physiol. B. 2017;188:1–13. doi: 10.1007/s00360-017-1105-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Heuer RM, Grosell M. Physiological impacts of elevated carbon dioxide and ocean acidification on fish. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2014;307:R1061–1084. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00064.2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Farrell, A. P. & Richards, J. G. In Fish Physiol. Vol. 27 (eds. Richards, J. G., Farrell, A. P. & Brauner, C. J.) 487–503 (2009).
  • 53.Murray CS, Baumann H. You better repeat it: Complex CO2 × temperature effects in Atlantic silverside offspring revealed by serial experimentation. Diversity. 2018;10:69. doi: 10.3390/d10030069. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Snyder JT, Murray CS, Baumann H. Potential for maternal effects on offspring CO2 sensitivities in the Atlantic silverside (Menidia menidia) J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2018;499:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jembe.2017.11.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Malvezzi AJ, et al. A quantitative genetic approach to assess the evolutionary potential of a coastal marine fish to ocean acidification. Evol. Appl. 2015;8:352–362. doi: 10.1111/eva.12248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Mehrbach C, Culberson CH, Hawley JE, Pytkowicxz RM. Measurement of apparent dissociation constants of carbonic acid in seawater at atmospheric pressure. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1973;18:897–907. doi: 10.4319/lo.1973.18.6.0897. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Dickson AG, Millero FJ. A comparison of the equilibrium-constants for the dissociation of carbonic-acid in seawater media. Deep-Sea Res. Pt I. 1987;34:1733–1743. doi: 10.1016/0198-0149(87)90021-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Dickson AG. Standard potential of the reaction: AgCl(s) + 2H2(g) = Ag(s) + HCl(aq), and and the standard acidity constant of the ion HSO4− in synthetic sea water from 273.15 to 318.15 K. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 1990;22:113–127. doi: 10.1016/0021-9614(90)90074-Z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.R. Core Team, R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.Rproject.org/. (2017).
  • 60.Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 2015;67:1–48. doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Lenth, R. emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means. R package version 1.2.3. (2018).

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information (146.7KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

Datasets are publicly available from the BCO-DMO data portal via the following DOIs: survival dataset - 10.1575/1912/bco-dmo.777117.1, growth dataset - 10.1575/1912/bco-dmo.777130.1 and carbonate chemistry dataset - 10.1575/1912/bco-dmo.777144.1.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES