In the original article, there was a mistake in Table 1 as published. In Goldenberg's study, measuring the relationship between ability EI and social support, r appears as 0.42, CI (lower bound) as 0.31, CI (upper bound) as 0.52, and d as 0.92. However, r should be 0.04, CI (lower bound) −0.09, CI (upper bound) 0.17, and d 0.08. The corrected Table 1 appears below.
Table 1.
Authors | N | ER Family | Specific variable | T/A | Measure used | Facet | r | CI r (lower bound) | CI r (upper bound) | d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Schutte et al., 2009 | 73 | SS | Situation selection | T | AES | 0.30 | 0.08 | 0.49 | 0.63 | |
Ciarrochi et al., 2002 | 302 | SS | Daily hassles | T | EIS | −0.01 | −0.12 | 0.10 | −0.02 | |
Day et al., 2005 | 133 | SS | Daily hassles | T | EQ-I | AGS | −0.43 | −0.51 | −0.27 | −0.94 |
Kim and Agrusa, 2011 | 385 | SS | Avoidant coping | T | WLEIS | 0.15 | 0.05 | 0.25 | 0.30 | |
Shah and Thingujam, 2008 | 197 | SS | Avoidant coping | T | EIS | AGS | −0.08 | −0.22 | 0.06 | −0.16 |
Rogers et al., 2006 | 253 | SS | Avoidant coping | T | SREIT | −0.04 | −0.16 | 0.08 | −0.08 | |
Velasco et al., 2006 | 593 | SS | Avoidant coping | T | TMMS-alex F1 | −0.16 | −0.24 | −0.08 | −0.32 | |
Petrides et al., 2007a (study 1) | 166 | SS | Avoidant coping | T | modified EQ-i | −0.34 | −0.47 | −0.20 | −0.72 | |
Petrides et al., 2007a (study2 sample1) | 200 | SS | Avoidant coping | T | TEIQue-LF | −0.39 | −0.50 | −0.27 | −0.84 | |
Petrides et al., 2007b | 274 | SS | Avoidant coping | T | TEIQue-LF | 0.01 | −0.11 | 0.13 | 0.02 | |
MacCann et al., 2011 | 159 | SS | Avoidant coping | A | MSCEIT | AGS | −0.21 | −0.35 | −0.06 | −0.43 |
Gerits et al., 2004 | 380 | SS | Avoidant coping | T | EQ-i | −0.23 | −0.32 | −0.13 | −0.47 | |
Monaci et al., 2013 | 198 | SS | Avoidant coping | T | SEIS | 0.01 | −0.13 | 0.15 | 0.02 | |
Mikolajczak et al., 2009a | 490 | SS | Avoidant coping | T | TEIQue-ASF | −0.26 | −0.34 | −0.18 | −0.54 | |
Petrides et al., 2006a | 37 | SS | Perseverance | T | TEIQue-LF | 0.53 | 0.25 | 0.74 | 1.25 | |
Dunn et al., 2007 | 84 | SS | Forecast accuracy | A | MSCEIT | −0.19 | 0.06 | 0.62 | −0.38 | |
Dunn et al., 2007 | 84 | SS | Forecast accuracy | T | SREIS | −0.09 | −0.39 | 0.02 | −0.18 | |
Hoerger et al., 2012 (study 1) |
81 | SS | Forecast accuracy | T | SEI/SREIS/TEIQue | 0.22 | −0.30 | 0.13 | 0.45 | |
Hoerger et al., 2012 (study 1) |
81 | SS | Forecast accuracy | A | JET+IJI | 0.36 | −0.01 | 0.41 | 0.77 | |
Hoerger et al., 2012 (study 2) |
81 | SS | Forecast accuracy | T | TEIQue-SF | 0.27 | 0.16 | 0.54 | 0.56 | |
Hoerger et al., 2012 (study 2) |
81 | SS | Forecast accuracy | A | JET+IJI+STEU | 0.39 | 0.07 | 0.47 | 0.84 | |
Schutte et al., 2001b | 38 | SS | Persistence | T | SEIS | 0.37 | 0.19 | 0.56 | 0.79 | |
Bastian et al., 2005 | 246 | SS | Behavioral disengagement | T | TMMS+AES | R+C | −0.24 | −0.35 | −0.12 | −0.49 |
Bastian et al., 2005 | 246 | SS | Behavioral disengagement | A | MSCEIT | −0.16 | −0.28 | −0.04 | −0.32 | |
Tsaousis and Nikolaou, 2005 | 365 | SS | Time to relax | T | TEIQ | 0.43 | 0.35 | 0.51 | 0.95 | |
Schutte et al., 2009 | 73 | SM | Modifying situations | T | EIS | 0.20 | −0.03 | 0.42 | 0.41 | |
Moradi et al., 2011 | 200 | SM | Problem-focused coping | T | TMMS | R+C | 0.27 | 0.14 | 0.40 | 0.56 |
Petrides et al., 2007a (study 1) | 166 | SM | Problem-focused coping | T | modified EQ-i | 0.57 | 0.46 | 0.67 | 1.38 | |
Petrides et al., 2007a (study 2. sample 1) | 200 | SM | Problem-focused coping | T | TEIQue-LF | 0.67 | 0.59 | 0.75 | 1.80 | |
Petrides et al., 2007b | 274 | SM | Problem-focused coping | T | TEIQue-LF | 0.64 | 0.57 | 0.71 | 1.66 | |
MacCann et al., 2011 | 159 | SM | Problem-focused coping | A | MSCEIT | AGS | 0.14 | −0.02 | 0.29 | 0.28 |
Shah and Thingujam, 2008 | 197 | SM | Problem-focused coping | T | EIS | AGS | 0.21 | 0.07 | 0.34 | 0.43 |
Goldenberg et al., 2006 | 223 | SM | Problem-focused coping | T | SREIS | 0.55 | 0.46 | 0.64 | 1.31 | |
Goldenberg et al., 2006 | 223 | SM | Problem-focused coping | A | MSCEIT | 0.17 | 0.04 | 0.30 | 0.34 | |
Kluemper, 2008 | 180 | SM | Problem-focused coping | T | WLEIS | 0.61 | 0.51 | 0.70 | 1.54 | |
Rogers et al., 2006 | 253 | SM | Problem-focused coping | T | SREIT | 0.30 | 0.19 | 0.41 | 0.63 | |
Mikolajczak et al., 2008 | 203 | SM | Problem-focused coping | T | TEIQue-LF | 0.40 | 0.29 | 0.51 | 0.87 | |
Salovey et al., 2002 (study 3) | 48 | SM | Problem-focused coping | T | TMMS | R+C | 0.34 | 0.06 | 0.57 | 0.71 |
Saklofske et al., 2007 | 362 | SM | Problem-focused coping | T | EIS | 0.38 | 0.29 | 0.46 | 0.82 | |
Almran and Punamaki, 2008 | 312 | SM | Problem-focused coping | T | EQ-I:YV-S | 0.25 | 0.14 | 0.36 | 0.51 | |
Velasco et al., 2006 | 593 | SM | Problem-focused coping | T | TMMS-alex F1 | 0.20 | 0.12 | 0.28 | 0.41 | |
Rahim and Minors, 2003 | 222 | SM | Problem solving | T | EQ-Index | AGS | 0.44 | 0.33 | 0.54 | 0.98 |
Monaci et al., 2013 | 198 | SM | Direct confrontation | T | SEIS | 0.43 | 0.31 | 0.54 | 0.95 | |
Montes-Berges and Augusto, 2007 | 119 | SM | Active coping | T | TMMS-24 | R+C | 0.05 | −0.13 | 0.23 | 0.11 |
Gerits et al., 2004 | 380 | SM | Active coping | T | EQ-I | 0.38 | 0.29 | 0.46 | 0.82 | |
Tsarenko and Strizhakova, 2013 | 252 | SM | Active coping | T | SREIS | 0.45 | 0.34 | 0.54 | 1.01 | |
Zomer, 2012 | 300 | SM | Active coping | T | TMMS-24 | R+C | 0.15 | 0.04 | 0.26 | 0.30 |
Bastian et al., 2005 | 246 | SM | Active coping + planning | T | TMMS+AES | R+C | 0.40 | 0.28 | 0.51 | 0.87 |
Bastian et al., 2005 | 246 | SM | Active coping + planning | A | MSCEIT | 0.05 | −0.08 | 0.18 | 0.10 | |
Bastian et al., 2005 | 246 | SM | Problem Solving Inventory | T | TMMS+AES | R+C | −0.43 | −0.53 | −0.32 | −0.94 |
Bastian et al., 2005 | 246 | SM | Problem Solving Inventory | A | MSCEIT | −0.04 | −0.17 | 0.09 | −0.08 | |
Austin et al., 2010 | 475 | SM | Task-oriented coping | T | EQ:i-S | AGS | 0.38 | 0.30 | 0.45 | 0.82 |
Saklofske et al., 2012 | 238 | SM | Task-oriented coping | T | EQ:i S | AGS | 0.48 | 0.38 | 0.57 | 1.09 |
Kim and Agrusa, 2011 | 385 | SM | Task coping | T | WLEIS | 0.54 | 0.46 | 0.61 | 1.28 | |
Mikolajczak et al., 2009a | 490 | SM | Rational coping | T | TEIQue-ASF | 0.46 | 0.39 | 0.53 | 1.03 | |
Monaci et al., 2013 | 198 | SM | Social support | T | SEIS | 0.36 | 0.24 | 0.48 | 0.77 | |
Bastian et al., 2005 | 246 | SM | Instrumental social support | T | TMMS+AES | R+C | 0.24 | 0.11 | 0.35 | 0.49 |
Bastian et al., 2005 | 246 | SM | Instrumental social support | A | MSCEIT | 0.06 | −0.07 | 0.19 | 0.12 | |
Zomer, 2012 | 300 | SM | Support from others | T | TMMS-24 | R+C | 0.11 | 0.00 | 0.22 | 0.21 |
Gerits et al., 2004 | 380 | SM | Social support seeking | T | EQ-i | 0.21 | 0.11 | 0.31 | 0.43 | |
Shah and Thingujam, 2008 | 197 | SM | Social support seeking | T | EIS | AGS | 0.07 | −0.08 | 0.21 | 0.13 |
Ciarrochi and Deane, 2001 | 300 | SM | Social support seeking | T | EIS | AGS | 0.15 | 0.05 | 0.25 | 0.26 |
Velasco et al., 2006 | 593 | SM | Social support seeking | T | TMMS-alex F1 | 0.13 | 0.05 | 0.21 | 0.26 | |
Goldenberg et al., 2006 | 223 | SM | Social support seeking | T | SREIS | 0.32 | 0.20 | 0.43 | 0.67 | |
Goldenberg et al., 2006 | 223 | SM | Social support seeking | A | MSCEIT | 0.04 | −0.09 | 0.17 | 0.08 | |
Zeidner and Kloda, 2013 | 200 | SM | Conflict res. (constructive) | A | MSCEIT | 0.24 | 0.11 | 0.37 | 0.49 | |
Zeidner and Kloda, 2013 | 200 | SM | Conflict res. (avoidance) | A | MSCEIT | −0.39 | −0.50 | −0.26 | −0.84 | |
Jordan and Troth, 2004 | 350 | SM | Conflict res. (integrate) | T | WEIP6 | 0.35 | 0.25 | 0.44 | 0.74 | |
Jordan and Troth, 2004 | 350 | SM | Conflict res. (avoid) | T | WEIP6 | −0.12 | −0.23 | −0.01 | −0.24 | |
Jordan and Troth, 2004 | 350 | SM | Conflict res. (dominate) | T | WEIP6 | 0.19 | 0.09 | 0.29 | 0.38 | |
Jordan and Troth, 2002 | 139 | SM | Conflict res. (collaborate) | T | WEIP6 | 0.53 | 0.40 | 0.64 | 1.25 | |
Jordan and Troth, 2002 | 139 | SM | Conflict res. (avoidance) | T | WEIP6 | −0.12 | −0.28 | 0.04 | −0.24 | |
Jordan and Troth, 2002 | 139 | SM | Conflict resolution (force) | T | WEIP6 | 0.02 | −0.15 | 0.19 | 0.04 | |
Jordan and Troth, 2002 | 139 | SM | Conflict res. (accommodate) | T | WEIP6 | −0.08 | −0.24 | 0.08 | −0.01 | |
Jordan and Troth, 2002 | 139 | SM | Conflict res. (compromise) | T | WEIP6 | 0.09 | −0.08 | 0.25 | 0.02 | |
Salami, 2010b | 320 | SM | Conflict res. (confronting) | T | WLEIS | 0.20 | 0.10 | 0.30 | 0.41 | |
Salami, 2010b | 320 | SM | Conflict res. (withdrawal) | T | WLEIS | 0.12 | 0.01 | 0.23 | 0.24 | |
Salami, 2010b | 320 | SM | Conflict resolution (forcing) | T | WLEIS | 0.12 | 0.01 | 0.23 | 0.24 | |
Salami, 2010b | 320 | SM | Conflict res. (smoothe) | T | WLEIS | 0.19 | 0.08 | 0.29 | 0.38 | |
Salami, 2010b | 320 | SM | Conflict res. (compromise) | T | WLEIS | 0.21 | 0.10 | 0.31 | 0.43 | |
Bastian et al., 2005 | 246 | SM | Restraint | T | TMMS+AES | 0.08 | −0.05 | 0.21 | 0.16 | |
Bastian et al., 2005 | 246 | SM | Restraint | A | MSCEIT | −0.04 | −0.17 | 0.09 | −0.08 | |
Schutte et al., 2009 | 73 | AD | Attention deployment | T | EIS | 0.38 | 0.17 | 0.56 | 0.82 | |
Bastian et al., 2005 | 246 | AD | Mental disengagement | T | TMMS+AES | −0.05 | −0.18 | 0.08 | −0.10 | |
Bastian et al., 2005 | 246 | AD | Mental disengagement | A | MSCEIT | −0.05 | −0.18 | 0.08 | −0.10 | |
Mikolajczak et al., 2008 | 203 | AD | Trait distraction | T | TEIQue-LF | 0.41 | 0.29 | 0.52 | 0.89 | |
Salovey et al., 2002 (study 3) | 48 | AD | State distraction | T | TMMS | R+C | 0.36 | 0.08 | 0.59 | 0.77 |
Saklofske et al., 2012 | 238 | AD | Distraction | T | EQ-i: S | −0.11 | −0.23 | 0.02 | −0.21 | |
Austin et al., 2010 | 475 | AD | Distraction | T | EQ-i: S | 0.18 | 0.09 | 0.27 | 0.37 | |
Lanciano et al., 2012 | 157 | AD | Dysfunctional rumination | A | MSCEIT | AGS | −0.44 | −0.56 | −0.30 | −0.98 |
Petrides et al., 2007b | 274 | AD | Trait rumination | T | TEIQue-LF | −0.47 | −0.56 | −0.38 | −1.06 | |
Petrides et al., 2007a (study 1) | 166 | AD | Trait rumination | T | modified EQ-i | −0.53 | −0.64 | −0.42 | −1.25 | |
Mikolajczak et al., 2008 | 203 | AD | Trait Rumination | T | TEIQue-LF | −0.10 | −0.24 | 0.04 | −0.20 | |
Ramos et al., 2007 | 144 | AD | State rumination | T | TMMS | R+C | −0.11 | −0.27 | 0.05 | −0.21 |
Salovey et al., 2002 (study 3) | 48 | AD | State rumination | T | TMMS | R+C | −0.27 | −0.51 | 0.02 | −0.55 |
Salguero et al., 2013 | 1154 | AD | Rumination | T | TMMS-24 | R+C | −0.11 | −0.17 | −0.05 | −0.22 |
Brown and Ryan, 2003 | 645 | AD | Mindful attention | T | TMMS-24 | R+C | 0.40 | 0.33 | 0.46 | 0.87 |
Wang and Kong, 2014 | 321 | AD | Mindful attention | T | WLEIS | 0.33 | 0.23 | 0.42 | 0.70 | |
Schutte and Malouff, 2011 | 125 | AD | Mindful attention | T | AES | 0.65 | 0.53 | 0.74 | 1.71 | |
Kokinda, 2010 | 108 | AD | Mindful attention | T | AES | 0.47 | 0.31 | 0.63 | 1.06 | |
Charoensukmongkol, 2014 | 317 | AD | Mindful attention | T | WLEIS | 0.32 | 0.22 | 0.42 | 0.68 | |
Baer et al., 2004 (study 4) | 130 | AD | Mindful attention | T | TMMS-24 | R+C | 0.24 | 0.07 | 0.40 | 0.49 |
Totterdell and Holman, 2003 | 18 | AD | Focus on positive | T | EIS | 0.46 | −0.01 | 0.79 | 1.03 | |
Schutte et al., 2009 | 73 | CC | Cognitive change | T | AES | 0.26 | 0.03 | 0.46 | 0.54 | |
Charoensukmongkol, 2014 | 317 | CC | Self-efficacy | T | WLEIS | 0.68 | 0.61 | 0.74 | 1.86 | |
Brown et al., 2003 | 288 | CC | Self-efficacy | T | EII-R | 0.25 | 0.14 | 0.36 | 0.50 | |
Chan, 2004 | 158 | CC | Self-efficacy | T | EIS | 0.32 | 0.17 | 0.45 | 0.66 | |
Martin et al., 2004 | 140 | CC | Self-efficacy | T | EJI | 0.54 | 0.41 | 0.65 | 1.27 | |
Durán et al., 2006 | 373 | CC | Self-efficacy | T | TMMS | R+C | 0.34 | 0.24 | 0.42 | 0.72 |
Kaur et al., 2006 | 117 | CC | Self-efficacy | T | EIS | 0.42 | 0.26 | 0.56 | 0.92 | |
Villanueva and Sanchez, 2007 | 70 | CC | Self-efficacy | T | SSRI | 0.36 | 0.13 | 0.54 | 0.77 | |
Di Fabio and Palazzeschi, 2008 | 169 | CC | Self-efficacy | T | EQ-i | 0.34 | 0.20 | 0.47 | 0.72 | |
Adeyemo, 2007 | 300 | CC | Self-efficacy | T | EQ-i | 0.17 | 0.06 | 0.28 | 0.34 | |
Mikolajczak et al., 2006 | 95 | CC | Self-efficacy | T | TEIQue-LF | 0.66 | 0.53 | 0.76 | 1.75 | |
Mikolajczak and Luminet, 2008 (study1) | 27 | CC | Self-efficacy | T | TEIQue-LF | 0.50 | 0.15 | 0.75 | 1.15 | |
Mikolajczak and Luminet, 2008 (study2) | 15 | CC | Self-efficacy | T | TEIQue-SF | 0.29 | −0.27 | 0.70 | 0.60 | |
Kirk et al., 2008 | 207 | CC | Self-efficaccy | T | AES | 0.73 | 0.66 | 0.79 | 2.13 | |
Kirk et al., 2008 | 207 | CC | Self-efficaccy | A | MSCEIT | 0.34 | 0.22 | 0.46 | 0.72 | |
Animasahun, 2008 | 300 | CC | Self-efficacy | T | EIS | 0.43 | 0.33 | 0.52 | 0.95 | |
Salami, 2010a | 242 | CC | Self-efficacy | T | WLEIS | 0.08 | −0.05 | 0.21 | 0.16 | |
Tsarenko and Strizhakova, 2013 | 252 | CC | Self-efficacy | T | SREIS | 0.57 | 0.48 | 0.65 | 1.38 | |
Mouton et al., 2013 | 119 | CC | Self-efficacy | T | TEIQue | 0.28 | 0.11 | 0.44 | 0.58 | |
Di Fabio and Saklofske, 2014b | 164 | CC | Core self-evaluationa | T | TEIQue/EQ-i | 0.56 | 0.45 | 0.65 | 1.35 | |
Di Fabio and Saklofske, 2014b | 164 | CC | Core self-evaluation | A | MSCEIT | 0.02 | −0.13 | 0.17 | 0.04 | |
Kluemper, 2008 | 180 | CC | Core self-evaluation | T | WLEIS | 0.73 | 0.65 | 0.79 | 2.14 | |
Di Fabio and Saklofske, 2014a | 194 | CC | Self-Efficacy | A | MSCEIT | 0.23 | 0.09 | 0.35 | 0.47 | |
Di Fabio and Saklofske, 2014a | 194 | CC | Self-Efficacy | T | EQ-i | 0.67 | 0.58 | 0.74 | 1.80 | |
Mikolajczak and Luminet, 2008 (study2) | 15 | CC | Ratio challenge/threat | T | TEIQue-SF | 0.72 | 0.33 | 0.9 | 2.07 | |
Mikolajczak et al., 2006 | 70 | CC | Challenge appraisal | T | TEIQue-LF | 0.02 | −0.22 | 0.26 | 0.04 | |
Mikolajczak et al., 2006 | 70 | CC | Threat appraisal | T | TEIQue-LF | −0.41 | −0.60 | −0.20 | −0.89 | |
Schutte et al., 2009 | 73 | CC | Reappraisal | T | AES | 0.46 | 0.26 | 0.62 | 1.03 | |
Shah and Thingujam, 2008 | 197 | CC | Positive reappraisal | T | EIS | AGS | 0.21 | 0.07 | 0.34 | 0.43 |
Mikolajczak et al., 2008 | 203 | CC | Reappraisal | T | TEIQue-LF | 0.46 | 0.34 | 0.56 | 1.03 | |
Velasco et al., 2006 | 593 | CC | Positive reappraisal | T | TMMS-alex F1 | 0.23 | 0.15 | 0.31 | 0.47 | |
Kafetsios and Loumakou, 2007 | 475 | CC | Reappraisal | T | EQ-I | 0.04 | −0.08 | 0.16 | 0.08 | |
Cabello et al., 2013 | 866 | CC | Reappraisal | T | TMMS-24 | R+C | 0.34 | 0.28 | 0.40 | 0.72 |
Coumans, 2005 | 31 | CC | Reappraisal | T | TEIQue-LF | 0.02 | −0.34 | 0.38 | 0.04 | |
Totterdell and Holman, 2003 | 18 | CC | Perspective taking | T | EIS | 0.21 | −0.29 | 0.62 | 0.43 | |
Moradi et al., 2011 | 200 | CC | Reappraisal | T | TMMS | R+C | 0.45 | 0.34 | 0.56 | 1.01 |
Bastian et al., 2005 | 246 | CC | Positive interpretation | T | TMMS+AES | R+C | 0.50 | 0.40 | 0.59 | 1.15 |
Bastian et al., 2005 | 246 | CC | Positive interpretation | A | MSCEIT | 0.11 | −0.02 | 0.24 | 0.21 | |
Bastian et al., 2005 | 246 | CC | Adaptive Humour | T | TMMS+AES | R+C | 0.14 | 0.01 | 0.26 | 0.28 |
Bastian et al., 2005 | 246 | CC | Adaptive Humour | A | MSCEIT | 0.04 | −0.09 | 0.17 | 0.08 | |
Zomer, 2012 | 300 | CC | Adaptive Humour | T | TMMS-24 | R+C | 0.01 | −0.10 | 0.12 | 0.02 |
Greven et al., 2008 | 1038 | CC | Adaptive Humour | T | TEIQue-LF | 0.45 | 0.40 | 0.50 | 0.99 | |
Greven et al., 2008 | 1038 | CC | Maladaptive Humour | T | TEIQue-LF | −0.27 | −0.33 | −0.21 | −0.55 | |
Tsarenko and Strizhakova, 2013 | 252 | CC | Denial | T | SREIS | −0.09 | −0.21 | 0.03 | −0.18 | |
Zomer, 2012 | 300 | CC | Denial | T | TMMS-24 | R+C | −0.16 | −0.27 | −0.05 | −0.32 |
Bastian et al., 2005 | 246 | CC | Denial | T | TMMS+AES | −0.15 | −0.27 | −0.02 | −0.30 | |
Bastian et al., 2005 | 246 | CC | Denial | A | MSCEIT | −0.20 | −0.32 | −0.08 | −0.41 | |
Zomer, 2012 | 300 | CC | Acceptance | T | TMMS-24 | R+C | 0.09 | −0.02 | 0.20 | 0.17 |
Bastian et al., 2005 | 246 | CC | Acceptance | T | TMMS+AES | 0.38 | 0.26 | 0.48 | 0.82 | |
Bastian et al., 2005 | 246 | CC | Acceptance | A | MSCEIT | 0.10 | −0.03 | 0.23 | 0.21 | |
Mikolajczak et al., 2008 | 203 | CC | Acceptance | T | TEIQue-LF | −0.06 | −0.20 | 0.08 | −0.12 | |
Bastian et al., 2005 | 246 | RM | Venting | T | TMMS+AES | 0.05 | −0.08 | 0.18 | 0.10 | |
Bastian et al., 2005 | 246 | RM | Venting | A | MSCEIT | 0.02 | −0.11 | 0.15 | 0.03 | |
Zomer, 2012 | 300 | RM | Venting | T | TMMS-24 | R+C | −0.27 | −0.37 | −0.16 | −0.56 |
Schutte et al., 2009 | 73 | RM | suppression (ERQ) | T | EIS | −0.50 | −0.66 | −0.31 | −1.15 | |
Johnson and Spector, 2007 | 176 | RM | Suppression | T | WLEIS | −0.08 | −0.23 | 0.07 | −0.16 | |
Austin et al., 2008 | 247 | RM | Suppression | T | TEIQue-SF | −0.45 | −0.55 | −0.35 | −1.01 | |
Mikolajczak et al., 2007b | 124 | RM | Suppression | T | TEIQue-SF | −0.31 | −0.46 | −0.14 | −0.65 | |
Totterdell and Holman, 2003 | 18 | RM | Suppression | T | EIS | −0.18 | −0.60 | 0.31 | −0.36 | |
Velasco et al., 2006 | 593 | RM | Suppression | T | TMMS-alex F1 | −0.28 | −0.35 | −0.21 | −0.58 | |
Kafetsios and Loumakou, 2007 | 475 | RM | Suppression (ERQ) | T | EQ-I | −0.08 | −0.20 | 0.04 | −0.16 | |
Cabello et al., 2013 | 866 | RM | Suppression | T | TMMS-24 | R+C | −0.13 | −0.20 | −0.06 | −0.26 |
Lee and Ok, 2012 | 309 | RM | Emotional dissonance | T | WLEIS | −0.22 | −0.33 | −0.11 | −0.45 | |
Rivers et al., 2013 | 243 | RM | Aggressive behavior | A | MSCEIT | −0.25 | −0.36 | −0.13 | −0.51 | |
Brackett et al., 2004 | 330 | RM | Deviant behavior | A | MSCEIT | −0.27 | −0.37 | −0.17 | −0.56 | |
Brackett and Mayer, 2003 | 207 | RM | Social deviance | T | EQ-i/SREIT | −0.14 | −0.27 | 0.00 | −0.28 | |
Shahzad et al., 2013 | 140 | RM | Aggression | T | TEIQue-ASF | −0.31 | −0.45 | −0.15 | −0.64 | |
Mikolajczak et al., 2009a | 490 | RM | Self-harm | T | TEIQue-ASF | −0.31 | −0.39 | −0.23 | −0.65 | |
Karim and Shah, 2014 | 192 | RM | Suicidal ideation | A | MSCEIT | AGS | −0.30 | −0.42 | −0.16 | −0.63 |
Aradilla-Herrero et al., 2014 | 93 | RM | Suicide risk | T | TMMS-24 | R+C | −0.21 | −0.40 | −0.01 | −0.43 |
Gardner et al., 2014 | 235 | RM | Bulimic symptoms | T | MEIA | −0.22 | −0.34 | −0.10 | −0.45 | |
Gardner et al., 2014 | 235 | RM | Bulimic symptoms | A | MSCEIT | −0.07 | −0.20 | 0.06 | −0.14 | |
Gardner et al., 2014 | 235 | RM | Binge eating | T | MEIA | −0.21 | −0.33 | −0.08 | −0.43 | |
Gardner et al., 2014 | 235 | RM | Binge eating | A | MSCEIT | −0.03 | −0.16 | 0.10 | −0.06 | |
Pettit et al., 2010 | 402 | RM | Bulimia/Food preocupation | T | TMMS-24 | R+C | −0.13 | −0.23 | −0.03 | −0.26 |
Markey and Vander Wal, 2007 | 154 | RM | Bulimic symptoms | T | EQ- i:S | −0.31 | −0.45 | −0.16 | −0.65 | |
Brackett et al., 2004 | 330 | RM | Illegal drug use | A | MSCEIT | −0.11 | −0.22 | 0.00 | −0.22 | |
Brackett et al., 2004 | 330 | RM | Alcohol use | A | MSCEIT | −0.13 | −0.24 | −0.02 | −0.26 | |
Rossen and Kranzler, 2009 | 150 | RM | Alcohol use | A | MSCEIT | −0.21 | −0.35 | −0.07 | −0.43 | |
Tsaousis and Nikolaou, 2005 | 365 | RM | Alcohol units | T | TEIQ | −0.07 | −0.17 | 0.03 | −0.14 | |
Austin et al., 2005 | 115 | RM | Acohol consumption | T | REIS | −0.19 | −0.37 | −0.01 | −0.38 | |
Ghee and Johnson, 2008 | 214 | RM | Alcohol consumption | T | EIS | −0.02 | −0.15 | 0.11 | −0.04 | |
Riley and Schutte, 2003 | 141 | RM | Acohol consumption | T | EIS | −0.34 | −0.48 | −0.2 | −0.72 | |
Brackett and Mayer, 2003 | 207 | RM | Alcohol consumption | T | EQ-i/SREIT | −0.13 | −0.26 | 0.01 | −0.26 | |
Trinidad and Johnson, 2002 | 205 | RM | Alcohol consumption | A | MEIS | −0.12 | −0.26 | 0.01 | −0.25 | |
Saklofske et al., 2007 | 362 | RM | Alcohol consumption | T | EIS | −0.05 | −0.15 | 0.05 | −0.10 | |
Brackett and Mayer, 2003 | 207 | RM | Illegal drug user scale | T | EQ-i/SREIT | −0.14 | −0.27 | −0.003 | −0.28 | |
Riley and Schutte, 2003 | 141 | RM | Drug abuse | T | EIS | −0.42 | −0.55 | −0.29 | −0.92 | |
Limonero et al., 2006 | 133 | RM | Canabis smoking | T | TMMS | R+C | −0.01 | −0.19 | 0.16 | −0.02 |
Bastian et al., 2005 | 246 | RM | Substance use | T | TMMS+AES | −0.05 | −0.18 | 0.08 | −0.10 | |
Bastian et al., 2005 | 246 | RM | Substance use | A | MSCEIT | −0.02 | −0.14 | 0.11 | −0.03 | |
Rivers et al., 2013 | 243 | RM | Substance abuse | A | MSCEIT | −0.18 | −0.31 | −0.06 | −0.36 | |
Schutte et al., 2011 | 100 | RM | Alcohol problems | A | MSCEIT | −0.30 | −0.46 | −0.11 | −0.63 | |
Schutte et al., 2011 | 100 | RM | Alcohol problems | T | AES | −0.27 | −0.45 | −0.08 | −0.56 | |
Zomer, 2012 | 300 | RM | Drugs | T | TMMS-24 | R+C | −0.11 | −0.22 | 0.00 | 0.21 |
Monaci et al., 2013 | 198 | RM | Alcohol use | T | SEIS | −0.05 | −0.19 | 0.09 | −0.10 | |
Solanki and Lane, 2010 | 315 | RM | Exercise mood regulating | T | EIS | 0.45 | 0.35 | 0.53 | 1.01 |
SS, Situation Selection; SM, Situation Modification; AD, Attentional Deployment; CC, Cognitive Change; RM, Response Modulation; T/A, Trait or Ability EI measure: T, trait EI measure, A, ability EI measure; AGS, Aggregated Global Score; R+C, Repair + Clarity; AES, Assessing Emotions Scale; EIS, Emotional Intelligence Scale; EQ-i/YV/S, Emotional Quotient Inventory/Young Version/Short; WLEIS, The Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale; SREIT, Self Report Emotional Intelligence Test; TMMS-24, Trait Meta Mood Scale; TEIQ, The Traits Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire; TEIQue/SF/LF/ASF, Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire/ Short-Form/Long-Form/Adolescent Short-Form; MSCEIT, The Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test; SEIS, Schutte Emotional Intelligence Scale; SREIS, Self-Reported Emotional Intelligence Scale; EQ-Index, Emotional Quotient Index; WEIP6, Workgroup Emotional Intelligence Profile-Version 6; EII-R, Emotional Intelligence Inventory Revised; MEIS, Multifactoral Emotional Intelligence Scale; EJI, Emotional Judgment Inventory; SSRI, Schutte Self-Report Inventory; MEIA, Multidimensional Emotional Intelligence Assessment; REIS, Revised Emotional Intelligence Scale; SEI, Survey of Emotional Intelligence. JET, Judgment of Emotions Test; IJI, Interpersonal Judgment Inventory; STEU, Situational Test of Emotional Understanding.
*The forecast accuracy indices were calculated such that higher numbers indicate poorer accuracy.
The core self-evaluation construct is a fundamental part of self-evaluated values, efficacy and abilities. It includes self-esteem, self-efficacy, internal locus of control and absence of pessimism.
As a consequence of the first mistake (r in Goldenberg's study was not 0.42, but 0.04), in the original article there was a mistake in Table 3 as published. The d related to Social support seeking was 0.50 in the original article. However, d should be 0.10 and CI around d should be 0.01 and 0.19. The corrected Table 3 appears below.
Table 3.
ER family | ER strategy | Number of studies | Total N | Dir. of effect | Effect-size (d) | 95% Confidence Interval around d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Situation selection | Forecast accuracy* | 1 | 84 | – | −0.45 | [−0.67; −0.23] |
Forecast accuracy | 2 | 162 | + | 0.81 | [0.65; 0.97] | |
Avoidant coping | 1 | 159 | – | −0.43 | [−0.59; −0.27] | |
Behavioral disengagement | 1 | 246 | – | −0.32 | [−0.44; −0.19] | |
Situation modification | Problem solving | 3 | 628 | + | 0.23 | [0.15; 0.31] |
Problem solving (negative) | 1 | 246 | – | −0.08 | [−0.21; 0.05] | |
Social support seeking | 2 | 469 | + | 0.10 | [0.01; 0.19] | |
Conflict resolution | 1 | 200 | + | 0.49 | [0.35; 0.63] | |
Conflict resolution (avoid) | 1 | 200 | – | −0.85 | [−0.99; −0.71] | |
Restraint | 1 | 246 | + | 0.15 | [0.02; 0.28] | |
Attentional deployment | Rumination | 1 | 157 | – | −0.98 | [−1.14; −0.82] |
Mental disengagement | 1 | 246 | – | −0.10 | [−0.23; 0.03] | |
Cognitive change | Self-efficacy | 3 | 564 | + | 0.47 | [0.33; 0.61] |
Positive interpretation | 1 | 246 | + | 0.21 | [0.08; 0.34] | |
Humour | 1 | 246 | + | 0.08 | [−0.05; 0.21] | |
Denial | 1 | 246 | – | −0.41 | [−0.54; −0.28] | |
Acceptance | 1 | 246 | + | 0.21 | [0.08; 0.34] | |
Response modulation | Venting | 1 | 246 | + | 0.27 | [0.14; 0.40] |
Aggressive behavior | 2 | 573 | – | −0.54 | [−0.62; −0.46] | |
Self-harm | 1 | 192 | – | −0.63 | [−0.77; −0.49] | |
Substance use | 7 | 1604 | – | −0.27 | [−0.32; −0.22] | |
Bulimia/Food preocupation | 2 | 470 | – | −0.10 | [−0.19; −0.01] |
The forecast accuracy indices were calculated such that higher numbers indicate poorer accuracy.
Furthermore, in the original article, there was an error. Interpretations were made considering the wrong r (in Goldenberg's study).
A correction has been made to Results section, subsection EI and Situation Modification, paragraph five:
“Regarding ability EI, the results obtained are consistent with those that use trait measures. Higher ability EI is associated with greater use of problem-focused coping (Goldenberg et al., 2006; MacCann et al., 2011; but see Bastian et al., 200512 for non-significant results), although there is no significant relationship between an individual's ability to restrain him or herself (wait for the appropriate moment to act and avoid acting prematurely) and EI (Bastian et al., 2005)13. Ability EI also relates to more social support seeking, although effect sizes are nearly null (see Bastian et al., 200514; Goldenberg et al., 2006)”.
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Footnotes
12The authors provided us with subcorrelations between Trait EI and the “Active Coping” and “Planning Coping” subscales of the COPE.
13The authors provided us with subcorrelations between Trait EI and the “Restraint Coping” subscale of the COPE.
14The authors provided us with subcorrelations between Trait EI and the “Instrumental Social Support” subscale of the COPE.
References
- Adeyemo D. A. (2007). Moderating influence of emotional intelligence on the link between academic self-efficacy and achievement of university students. Psychol. Dev. Soc. 19, 199–213. 10.1177/097133360701900204 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Almran J. I., Punamaki R. (2008). Relationship between gender, age, academic achievement, emotional intelligence, and coping styles in Bahraini adolescents. Individ. Diff. Res. 6, 104–119. [Google Scholar]
- Animasahun R. A. (2008). Predictive estimates of emotional intelligence, spiritual intelligence, self-efficacy and creativity skills on conflict resolution behaviour among the NURTW in the south-western Nigeria. Pak. J. Life Soc. Sci. 6, 68–74. [Google Scholar]
- Aradilla-Herrero A., Tomás-Sábado J., Gómez-Benito J. (2014). Associations between emotional intelligence, depression and suicide risk in nursing students. Nurse Educ. Today 34, 520–525. 10.1016/j.nedt.2013.07.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Austin E. J., Dore T. C. P., O'Donovan K. M. (2008). Associations of personality and emotional intelligence with display rule perceptions and emotional labour. Pers. Individ. Diff. 44, 679–688. 10.1016/j.paid.2007.10.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Austin E. J., Saklofske D. H., Egan V. (2005). Personality, well-being and health correlates of trait emotional intelligence. Pers. Individ. Diff. 38, 547–558. 10.1016/j.paid.2004.05.009 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Austin E. J., Saklofske D. H., Mastoras S. M. (2010). Emotional intelligence, coping and exam-related stress in Canadian undergraduate students. Aust. J. Psychol. 62, 42–50. 10.1080/00049530903312899 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Baer R. A., Smith G. T., Allen K. B. (2004). Assessment of mindfulness by self-report: the Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills. Assessment 11, 191–206. 10.1177/1073191104268029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bastian V. A., Burns N. R., Nettelbeck T. (2005). Emotional intelligence predicts life skills, but not as well as personality and cognitive abilities. Pers. Individ. Diff. 39, 1135–1145. 10.1016/j.paid.2005.04.006 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Brackett M. A., Mayer J. D. (2003). Convergent, discriminant, and incremental validity of competing measures of emotional intelligence. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 29, 1147–1158. 10.1177/0146167203254596 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brackett M. A., Mayer J. D., Warner R. M. (2004). Emotional intelligence and its relation to everyday behaviour. Pers. Individ. Diff. 36, 1387–1402. 10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00236-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Brown C., George-Curran R., Smith M. L. (2003). The role of emotional intelligence in the career commitment and decision-making process. J. Career Assess. 11, 379–392. 10.1177/1069072703255834 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Brown K. W., Ryan R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 84, 822–848. 10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cabello R., Salguero J. M., Fernández-Berrocal P., Gross J. J. (2013). A Spanish adaptation of the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire. Eur. J. Psychol. Assess. 29, 234–240. 10.1027/1015-5759/a000150 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chan D. W. (2004). Perceived emotional intelligence and self-efficacy among Chinese secondary school teachers in Hong Kong. Pers. Individ. Diff. 36, 1781–1795. 10.1016/j.paid.2003.07.007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Charoensukmongkol P. (2014). Benefits of mindfulness meditation on emotional intelligence, general self-efficacy, and perceived stress: evidence from Thailand. J. Spirit. Ment. Health 16, 171–192. 10.1080/19349637.2014.925364 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ciarrochi J., Deane F. P., Anderson S. (2002). Emotional intelligence moderates the relationship between stress and mental health. Pers. Individ. Diff. 32, 197–209. 10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00012-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ciarrochi J. V., Deane F. P. (2001). Emotional competence and willingness to seek help from professional and nonprofessional sources. Br. J. Guid. Couns. 29, 233–246. 10.1080/03069880124843 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Coumans N. (2005). L'Influence de l'Intelligence Émotionnelle sur les Processus Mnésiques Impliqués dans la Régulation Émotionnelle: Analyse du Décours Temporel [Impact of Emotional Intelligence on the Memory Processes Involved in Emotion Regulation: A Temporal Analysis]., Louvain-la-Neuve: Université Catholique de Louvain. [Google Scholar]
- Day A. L., Therrien D. L., Carroll S. A. (2005). Predicting psychological health: assessing the incremental validity of emotional intelligence beyond personality, type A behaviour, and daily hassles. Eur. J. Pers. 19, 519–536. 10.1002/per.552 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Di Fabio A., Palazzeschi L. (2008). Emotional intelligence and self-efficacy in a sample of Italian high school teachers. Soc. Behav. Pers. 36, 315–326. 10.2224/sbp.2008.36.3.315 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Di Fabio A., Saklofske D. H. (2014a). Comparing ability and self-report trait emotional intelligence, fluid intelligence, and personality traits in career decision. Pers. Individ. Diff. 64, 174–178. 10.1016/j.paid.2014.02.024 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Di Fabio A., Saklofske D. H. (2014b). Promoting individual resources: the challenge of trait emotional intelligence. Pers. Individ. Diff. 65, 19–23. 10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.026 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Dunn E. W., Brackett M. A., Ashton-James C., Schneiderman E., Salovey P. (2007). On emotionally intelligent time travel: individual differences in affective forecasting ability. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 33, 85–93. 10.1177/0146167206294201 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Durán A., Extremera N., Rey L., Fernandez-Berrocal P., Montalban F. (2006). Predicting academic burnout and in educational settings: assessing the incremental validity of perceived emotional intelligence beyond perceived stress and general self-efficacy. Psicotherma 18, 158–164. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gardner K. J., Quinton S., Qualter P. (2014). The role of trait and ability emotional intelligence in bulimic symptoms. Eat. Behav. 15, 237–240. 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2014.02.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gerits L., Derksen J. J. L., Verbruggen A. B. (2004). Emotional intelligence and adaptive success of nurses caring for people with mental retardation and severe behavior problems. Ment. Retard. Law 42, 106–121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ghee A. C., Johnson C. S. (2008). Emotional intelligence: a moderator of perceived alcohol peer norms and alcohol use. J. Drug Educ. 38, 71–83. 10.2190/DE.38.1.f [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goldenberg I., Matheson K., Mantler J. (2006). The assessment of emotional intelligence: a comparison of performance-based and self-report methodologies. J. Pers. Assess. 86, 33–45. 10.1207/s15327752jpa8601_05 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Greven C., Chamorro-Premuzic T., Arteche A., Furnham A. (2008). A hierarchical integration of dispositional determinants of general health in students: the Big Five, trait emotional intelligence, and humor styles. Pers. Individ. Diff. 44, 1562–1573. 10.1016/j.paid.2008.01.012 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hoerger M., Chapman B. P., Epstein R. M., Duberstein P. R. (2012). Emotional intelligence: a theoretical framework for individual differences in affective forecasting. Emotion 12, 716–725. 10.1037/a0026724 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johnson H. A. M., Spector P. E. (2007). Service with a smile: do emotional intelligence, gender, and autonomy moderate the emotional labour process? J. Occup. Health Psychol. 12, 319–333. 10.1037/1076-8998.12.4.319 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jordan P. J., Troth A. C. (2002). Emotional intelligence and conflict resolution: implications for human resource development. Adv. Dev. Hum. Resour. 4, 62–79. 10.1177/1523422302004001005 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Jordan P. J., Troth A. C. (2004). Managing emotions during team problem solving: emotional intelligence and conflict resolution. Hum. Perform. 17, 195–218. 10.1207/s15327043hup1702_4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kafetsios K., Loumakou M. (2007). A comparative evaluation of the effects of trait emotional intelligence and emotion regulation on affect at work and job satisfaction. Int. J. Work Org. Emot. 2, 71–87. 10.1504/IJWOE.2007.013616 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Karim J., Shah S. H. (2014). Ability emotional intelligence predicts quality of life beyond personality, affectivity, and cognitive intelligence. Appl. Res. Qual. Life 9, 733–747. 10.1007/s11482-013-9267-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kaur I., Schutte N. S., Thorsteinsson E. B. (2006). Gambling control self-efficacy as a mediator of the effects of low emotional intelligence on problem gambling. J. Gambl. Stud. 22, 405–411. 10.1007/s10899-006-9029-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim H. J., Agrusa J. (2011). Hospitality service employees' coping styles: the role of emotional intelligence, two basic personality traits, and socio-demographic factors. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 30, 588–598. 10.1016/j.ijhm.2010.11.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kirk B. A., Schutte N. S., Hine D. W. (2008). Development and preliminary validation of an emotional self-efficacy scale. Pers. Individ. Diff. 45, 432–436. 10.1016/j.paid.2008.06.010 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kluemper D. H. (2008). Trait emotional intelligence. The impact of core-self evaluations and social desirability. Pers. Individ. Diff. 44, 1402–1412. 10.1016/j.paid.2007.12.008 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kokinda L. (2010). The Effects of Meditation on Openness, Awareness, and Acceptance: A Correlational Study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University Los Angeles.
- Lanciano T., Curci A., Kafetsios K., Elia L., Zammuner V. L. (2012). Attachment and dysfunctional rumination: the mediating role of emotional intelligence abilities. Pers. Individ. Diff. 53, 753–758. 10.1016/j.paid.2012.05.027 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lee J. H., Ok C. (2012). Reducing burnout and enhancing job satisfaction: critical role of hotel employees emotional intelligence and emotional labour. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 31, 1101–1112. 10.1016/j.ijhm.2012.01.007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Limonero J. T., Tomás-Sábado J., Fernández-Castro J. (2006). Perceived emotional intelligence and its relation to tobacco and cannabis use among university students. Psicothema 18, 95–100. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MacCann C., Fogarty G. J., Zeidner M., Roberts R. D. (2011). Coping mediates the relationship between emotional intelligence (EI) and academic achievement. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 36, 60–70. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.11.002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Markey M. A., Vander Wal J. S. (2007). The role of emotional intelligence and negative affect in bulimic symptomatology. Compr. Psychiatry 48, 458–464. 10.1016/j.comppsych.2007.05.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martin W. E., Easton C., Wilson S., Takemoto M., Sullivan S. (2004). Salience of emotional intelligence as core characteristics of being a counselor. Couns. Educ. Superv. 44, 17–30. 10.1002/j.1556-6978.2004.tb01857.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Mikolajczak M., Luminet O. (2008). Trait emotional intelligence and the cognitive appraisal of stressful events: an exploratory study. Pers. Individ. Diff. 44, 1445–1453. 10.1016/j.paid.2007.12.012 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Mikolajczak M., Luminet O., Menil C. (2006). Predicting resistance to stress: incremental validity of trait emotional intelligence over alexithymia and optimism. Psicothema 18, 79–88. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mikolajczak M., Menil C., Luminet O. (2007b). Explaining the protective effect of trait emotional intelligence regarding occupational stress: exploration of emotional labor processes. J. Res. Pers. 41, 1107–1117. 10.1016/j.jrp.2007.01.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Mikolajczak M., Nelis D., Quoidbach J., Hansenne M. (2008). If you can regulate sadness, you can probably regulate shame: impact of emotional intelligence on emotion regulation and coping efficiency across discrete emotions. Pers. Individ. Diff. 44, 1356–1368. 10.1016/j.paid.2007.12.004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Mikolajczak M., Petrides K. V., Hurry J. (2009a). Adolescents choosing self-harm as an emotion regulation strategy: the protective role of trait emotional intelligence. Br. J. Clin. Psychol. 48, 181–193. 10.1348/014466508X386027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Monaci M. C., Scacchi L., Posa M., Trentin R. (2013). Peer pressure and alcohol consumption among university students: the moderating effect of emotional intelligence. Boll. Psicol. Appl. 267, 17–31. [Google Scholar]
- Montes-Berges B., Augusto J. M. (2007). Exploring the relationship between perceived emotional intelligence, coping, social support and mental health in nursing students. J. Psychiatr. Ment. Health Nurs. 14, 163–171. 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2007.01059.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moradi A., Pishva N., Ehsan H. B., Hadadi P., Pouladi F. (2011). The relationship between coping strategies and emotional intelligence. Soc. Behav. Sci. 30, 748–751. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.146 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Mouton A., Hansenne M., Delcour R., Cloes M. (2013). Emotional intelligence and self-efficacy among physical education teachers. J. Teach. Phys. Educ. 32, 342–354. [Google Scholar]
- Petrides K. V., Niven L., Mouskounti T. (2006a). The trait emotional intelligence of ballet dancers and musicians. Psicothema 18, 101–107. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Petrides K. V., Pérez-González J. C., Furnham A. (2007a). On the criterion and incremental validity of trait emotional intelligence. Cogn. Emot. 21, 26–55. 10.1080/02699930601038912 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Petrides K. V., Pita R., Kokkinaki F. (2007b). The location of trait emotional intelligence in personality factor space. Br. J. Psychol. 98, 273–289. 10.1348/000712606X120618 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pettit M. L., Jacobs S. C., Page K. S., Porras C. V. (2010). An assessment of perceived emotional intelligence and eating attitudes among college students. Am. J. Health Educ. 41, 46–52. 10.1080/19325037.2010.10599126 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Rahim M. A., Minors P. (2003). Effects of emotional intelligence on concern for quality and problem solving. Manag. Audit. J. 18, 150–155. 10.1108/02686900310455146 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ramos N., Fernández-Berrocal P., Extremera N. (2007). Perceived emotional intelligence facilitates cognitive-emotional processes of adaptation to an acute stressor. Cogn. Emot. 21, 758–772. 10.1080/02699930600845846 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Riley H., Schutte N. S. (2003). Low emotional intelligence as a predictor of substance-use problems. J. Drug Educ. 33, 391–398. 10.2190/6DH9-YT0M-FT99-2X05 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rivers S. E., Brackett M. A., Omori M., Sickler C. (2013). Emotion skills as a protective factor for risky behaviors among college students. J. Coll. Stud. Dev. 54, 172–183. 10.1353/csd.2013.0012 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Rogers P., Qualter P., Phelps G., Gardner K. (2006). Belief in the paranormal, coping and emotional intelligence. Pers. Individ. Diff. 41, 1089–1105. 10.1016/j.paid.2006.04.014 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Rossen E., Kranzler J. H. (2009). Incremental validity of the Mayer–Salovey–Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test Version 2.0 (MSCEIT) after controlling for personality and intelligence. J. Res. Pers. 43, 60–65. 10.1016/j.jrp.2008.12.002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Saklofske D. H., Austin E. J., Galloway J., Davidson K. (2007). Individual difference correlates of health-related behaviours: preliminary evidence for links between emotional intelligence and coping. Pers. Individ. Diff. 42, 491–502. 10.1016/j.paid.2006.08.006 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Saklofske D. H., Austin E. J., Mastoras S. M., Beaton L., Osborne S. E. (2012). Relationships of personality, affect, emotional intelligence and coping with student stress and academic success: different patterns of association for stress and success. Learn. Individ. Diff. 22, 251–257. 10.1016/j.lindif.2011.02.010 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Salami S. O. (2010a). Emotional intelligence, self-efficacy, psychological well-being and students' attitudes: implications for quality education. Eur. J. Educ. Stud. 2, 247–257. [Google Scholar]
- Salami S. O. (2010b). Conflict resolution strategies and organizational citizenship behavior: the moderating role of trait emotional intelligence. Soc. Behav. Pers. 38, 75–86. 10.2224/sbp.2010.38.1.75 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Salguero J. M., Extremera N., Fernandez-Berrocal P. (2013). A meta-mood model of rumination and depression: preliminary test in a non-clinical population. Scand. J. Psychol. 54, 166–172. 10.1111/sjop.12026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Salovey P., Stroud L. R., Woolery A., Epel E. (2002). Perceived emotional intelligence, stress reactivity, and symptom reports: further explorations using the Trait Meta-Mood Scale. Psychol. Health 17, 611–627. 10.1080/08870440290025812 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Schutte N. S., Malouff J. M. (2011). Emotional intelligence mediates the relationship between mindfulness and subjective well-being. Pers. Individ. Diff. 50, 1116–1119. 10.1016/j.paid.2011.01.037 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Schutte N. S., Malouff J. M., Hine D. W. (2011). The association of ability and trait emotional intelligence with alcohol problems. Addict. Res. Theory 19, 260–265. 10.3109/16066359.2010.512108 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Schutte N. S., Manes R. R., Malouff J. M. (2009). Antecedent-focused emotion regulation, response modulation and well-being. Curr. Psychol. 28, 21–31. 10.1007/s12144-009-9044-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Schutte N. S., Schuettpelz E., Malouff J. M. (2001b). Emotional intelligence and task performance. Imagin. Cogn. Pers. 20, 347–354. 10.2190/J0X6-BHTG-KPV6-2UXX [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Shah M., Thingujam N. S. (2008). Perceived emotional intelligence and ways of coping among students. J. Indian Acad. Appl. Psychol. 34, 83–91. [Google Scholar]
- Shahzad S., Begum N., Khan A. (2013). Understanding emotions in adolescents: linkage of trait emotional intelligence with aggression. Asian J. Soc. Sci. Hum. 2, 386–394. [Google Scholar]
- Solanki D., Lane A. M. (2010). Relationships between exercise as a mood regulation strategy and trait emotional intelligence. Asian J. Sports Med. 1, 195–200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Totterdell P., Holman D. (2003). Emotion regulation in customer service roles: testing a model of emotional labor. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 8, 55–73. 10.1037/1076-8998.8.1.55 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Trinidad D. R., Johnson C. A. (2002). The association between emotional intelligence and early adolescent tobacco and alcohol use. Pers. Individ. Diff. 32, 95–105. 10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00008-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Tsaousis I., Nikolaou I. (2005). Exploring the relationship of emotional intelligence with physical and psychological health functioning. Stress Health 21, 77–86. 10.1002/smi.1042 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Tsarenko Y., Strizhakova Y. (2013). Coping with service failures. Eur. J. Market. 47, 71–92. 10.1108/03090561311285466 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Velasco C., Fernández I., Páez D., Campos M. (2006). Perceived emotional intelligence, alexithymia, coping and emotional regulation. Psicothema 18, 89–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Villanueva J. J., Sanchez J. C. (2007). Trait emotional intelligence and leadership self-efficacy: their relationship with collective efficacy. Span. J. Psychol. 10, 349–357. 10.1017/S1138741600006612 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang Y., Kong F. (2014). The role of emotional intelligence in the impact of mindfulness on life satisfaction and mental distress. Soc. Indic. Res. 116, 843–852. 10.1007/s11205-013-0327-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zeidner M., Kloda I. (2013). Emotional intelligence (EI), conflict resolution patterns, and relationship satisfaction: actor and partner effects revisited. Pers. Individ. Diff. 54, 278–283. 10.1016/j.paid.2012.09.013 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zomer L. M. A. (2012). The Relationships among Emotional Intelligence, Gender, Coping Strategies, and Well-Being in the Management of Stress in Close Interpersonal Relationships and the Workplace. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto.