Abstract
O-GlcNAcylation is an abundant post-translational modification in the nervous system, linked to both neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disease. However, the mechanistic links between these phenotypes and site-specific O-GlcNAcylation remain largely unexplored. Here, we show that Ser517 O-GlcNAcylation of the microtubule-binding protein Collapsin Response Mediator Protein-2 (CRMP2) increases with age. By generating and characterizing a Crmp2S517A knock-in mouse model, we demonstrate that loss of O-GlcNAcylation leads to a small decrease in body weight and mild memory impairment, suggesting that Ser517 O-GlcNAcylation has a small but detectable impact on mouse physiology and cognitive function.
Keywords: O-GlcNAcylation, CRMP2, crosstalk, cognitive function
1. Introduction
Intracellular homeostasis and rapid cellular responses to extracellular stimuli are coordinated by combinations of different post-translational modifications on proteins. O-GlcNAcylation involves the addition of O-linked N-acetylglucosamine (O-GlcNAc) to serine/threonine residues on nucleocytoplasmic proteins [1–3]. Levels of protein O-GlcNAcylation are linked to levels of the sugar donor UDP-GlcNAc synthesized via the hexosamine biosynthetic pathway (HBP) that integrates input from carbohydrate, amino acid, fat and nucleotide metabolism [4]. O-GlcNAcylation has been proposed to fine-tune protein function according to nutrient levels in conjunction with stress signals [5]. As a consequence of perturbations in cellular UDP-GlcNAc levels due to defects of metabolic homeostasis, abnormal levels of O-GlcNAcylation have been suggested to contribute to the development of chronic diseases such as diabetes, cancer and neurodegeneration [6,7].
Only two enzymes, O-GlcNAc transferase (OGT) and O-GlcNAc hydrolase (OGA), are responsible for establishing the dynamic O-GlcNAcome, by addition and removal of the modification, respectively [8–10]. It is well established that OGT is essential for mammalian embryogenesis, and Ogt−/− null mice are not viable [11–14]. OGA, encoded by a single gene (Mgea5/Oga), is also indispensable for mammalian development. Mice homozygous for Oga−/− mutation do not survive beyond perinatal development and show defects in glycogen mobilization [15,16]. O-GlcNAcylation is particularly important in the nervous system. Neuron-specific genetic ablation of Ogt in mice results in severely attenuated neurodevelopment [17]. Furthermore, loss of Ogt in the adult mouse brain leads to neurodegenerative phenotypes [18]. Studies using conditional Ogt knock-out mice have revealed essential roles for O-GlcNAcylation in controlling appetite [19], browning of white adipose tissue through regulating Agouti-related protein neurons [20] and excitatory synapse maturation [21]. In humans, missense mutations in Ogt have recently been linked to the X-linked intellectual disability syndrome OGT-XLID [22–26].
Despite the identification of numerous O-GlcNAc modification sites in over 3000 proteins, little is known about their physiological and functional significance in vivo. It also remains unknown how specific modifications could contribute to the severe phenotypes observed in Ogt−/− and Oga−/− null models, as well as human OGT-XLID or chronic diseases. O-GlcNAcylation has been implicated in a large spectrum of cellular processes [27,28], including transcriptional regulation [29], signal transduction networks [30,31], protein folding [32], mitochondrial function [33,34] and protein degradation [35]. Driven by converging pre-clinical and pathological insights associated with loss of OGT function, we sought to identify candidate O-GlcNAc proteins underlying these phenotypes.
Proteomics studies have suggested the presence of O-GlcNAc on Collapsin Response Mediator Protein-2 (CRMP2), one of the most abundant neuronal proteins that binds to tubulin heterodimers and promotes microtubule assembly [36]. The C-terminal disordered region of CRMP2 is O-GlcNAcylated at a single position, within a region that harbours key CDK5/GSK3β regulatory phosphosites [37,38]. These sites are known to be targeted by axon-guiding Semaphorin3A/PlexinA signalling [39]. O-GlcNAcylation has been proposed to counteract hyperphosphorylation of Tau, possibly opposing the formation or propagation of pathogenic neurofibrillary tangles associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD) [40]. CRMP2 hyperphosphorylation has been observed in neurofibrillary tangles of AD patient brain tissue [41]. Furthermore, CRMP2 hyperphosphorylation is an early phenotypic event in pre-clinical mouse models of AD, occurring prior to the onset of inclusion pathology [41,42]. Elevated levels of phospho-CRMP2 have also been identified in breast cancer [43] and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [44]. Oncogenic potential is regulated by phosphorylation of the nuclear isoform, CRMP2A, at Ser522 [45], highlighting the importance of phospho-CRMP2 in chronic disease states. Given the position of the CRMP2 O-GlcNAc site, it is plausible that there is interplay with this regulatory phosphorylation, as has been proposed for other proteins [46–49].
Under normal conditions, CRMP2 controls cellular processes involving active rearrangements of microtubules such as neurite outgrowth, centrosome positioning and motility [50]. CRMP2 (encoded by DPYSL2) has also been implicated in anterograde axonal transport of various neuronal proteins such as TrkB [51] and the Sra1/WAVE1 complex [52]. Furthermore, CRMP2 interacts with the Ca2+-binding protein CaM, the N-type voltage-gated calcium channel (CaV2.2) and the NMDA receptor (NMDAR) subunits NR2A/2B [53]. Taken together, CRMP2 serves as an important adaptor/scaffold protein central to neuronal function [53]. Although viable, Crmp2−/− mice exhibit aberrant dendritic and synaptic development, leading to abnormal locomotion and social behaviour [54–56]. The CRMP2–tubulin interaction is regulated by Cdk5, which phosphorylates CRMP2 at Ser522 [57], allowing for subsequent processive phosphorylation of CRMP2 at Thr509, Thr514 and Ser518 by GSK3β [57,58]. This multi-site phosphorylation restricts the ability of CRMP2 to interact with tubulin, leading to growth cone collapse and neurite retraction [57]. Previous work has demonstrated that O-GlcNAcylation blocks hyperphosphorylation on a peptide derived from the corresponding C-terminal tail sequence in vitro [38]. Conversely, Thr514 phosphorylation hampers O-GlcNAcylation, thus suggesting a possible regulatory role for the Ser517 O-GlcNAc site.
Here, we demonstrate that the sole O-GlcNAcylation site on CRMP2 in vivo is located at Ser517, within the flexible C-terminal tail of the protein that is unique among the CRMP family. We reveal that O-GlcNAcylation at Ser517 is inducible and dynamic, increasing with age in the human brain. To dissect the physiological role of CRMP2 O-GlcNAcylation, we generated Crmp2S517A knock-in mice, which exhibited significant effects on body weight and cognitive function. Our study highlights the physiological importance of single O-GlcNAc modifications, establishing a framework for similar discoveries in the wider O-GlcNAc proteome.
2. Results and discussion
2.1. CRMP2 is O-GlcNAcylated at Ser517 in vivo
Several neuronal-specific proteins have been found to be modified by O-GlcNAc at serine and threonine residues, including CRMP2, an abundant protein involved in axonal guidance [59–61]. In vitro findings have suggested that CRMP2 is O-GlcNAcylated on Ser517 [38]. Remarkably, CRMP2 sequences including the O-GlcNAc site are highly conserved across mammalian species. CRMP2 is 99% identical in sequence in human, mouse, rat and sheep CRMP2. To investigate the sites of O-GlcNAcylation on CRMP2 in vivo, full-length CRMP2 was purified from sheep brain using ion exchange chromatography. Direct site mapping was not feasible, possibly because of low O-GlcNAcylation stoichiometry of CRMP2 in biological samples. However, we have exploited a recently reported O-GlcNAc protein enrichment method using the non-selective and high-affinity binding by a mutant version of the bacterial O-GlcNAcase from Clostridium perfringens (CpOGAD298N) [62,63]. Following this approach, we performed site mapping of O-GlcNAc by mass spectrometry, leading to the identification of a single O-GlcNAcylation site at Ser517 (electronic supplementary material, figure S1), which is in agreement with previous reports [38]. The Ser517 O-GlcNAc site on mammalian CRMP2 is unique among members of the CRMP family (figure 1a) and the proximal amino acid sequence matches the peptide sequon for OGT recognition [61,64,65]. Thus, Ser517 appears to be the bona fide site for CRMP2 O-GlcNAcylation in vivo.
2.2. CRMP2 O-GlcNAcylation increases during human ageing
Overall levels of protein O-GlcNAcylation fluctuate during development and lifespan in the mammalian brain [15,66]. Although overall protein O-GlcNAcylation tends to increase with age in rodents, our temporal knowledge of site-specific O-GlcNAcylation events in mammalian tissues has remained largely obscure. To define and clarify the dynamics of a single O-GlcNAcylation modification in vivo, we generated anti-CRMP2 Ser517 O-GlcNAc site-specific antibody for this purpose (electronic supplementary material, figure S2). To investigate this selective O-GlcNAcylation event in a more human context, we profiled CRMP2 O-GlcNAcylation in healthy ageing and neurodegeneration using human post-mortem brain samples (electronic supplementary material, figure S2). Experiments with this antibody revealed that O-GlcNAcylation on CRMP2 gradually increases during the ageing process (figure 1b,c; Pearson correlation coefficient 0.57). We also found an increased trend of CRMP2 O-GlcNAcylation in post-mortem brain samples from AD patients compared with aged-matched controls; however, this did not reach significance in the samples tested (electronic supplementary material, figure S3). Taken together, these data show that CRMP2 O-GlcNAcylation increases as a function of the ageing process in humans.
2.3. Site-specific O-GlcNAcylation of CRMP2 is post-translational and dynamic
O-GlcNAc glycosylation is a reversible and inducible post-translational modification [27,67–69]. For a limited subset of proteins, O-GlcNAcylation has been suggested to be co-translational, preventing premature degradation of nascent polypeptides [70]. We next assessed the post-translational or co-translational nature of O-GlcNAcylation on CRMP2, by probing cycling of the O-GlcNAc site using chemical inhibition of protein synthesis. We treated murine neuroblastoma Neuro-2a cells expressing Flag-CRMP2 with cycloheximide and subsequently with GlcNAcstatin G, a highly selective OGA inhibitor that enhances cellular O-GlcNAc levels [71,72]. Although blocking protein translation diminished CRMP2 protein levels, it did not alter induction of O-GlcNAcylation on CRMP2 (figure 1d).
We next sought to determine the dynamic nature of this modification in vivo. The most potent and selective OGA inhibitor currently available is GlcNAcstatin G [72]. This molecule is able to raise O-GlcNAc levels in cells by disrupting the balance between O-GlcNAc transfer and hydrolysis, yet it has not been explored whether this enhancement can occur in the context of a whole organism. We infused (8 µl h−1) female NMRI mice (n = 7) over a 24 h period with GlcNAcstatin G (n = 4, 10 mg ml−1) or dose vehicle only (n = 3) using Alzet osmotic pumps implanted subcutaneously with jugular vein cannulation. Pharmacokinetics was assessed in one mouse, with blood samples taken at 15, 30 min, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 21 h, then terminal blood and brain collected at 24 h. At 24 h, a terminal blood sample was also taken from all remaining mice (n = 6), and brains were harvested for biochemical analysis. GlcNAcstatin G concentrations in blood and brain were determined by ultra-performance liquid chromatography--tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) following a suitable extraction procedure (electronic supplementary material, table S1). In the single animal assessed for pharmacokinetics, the brain : blood ratio was 0.07 at 24 h, with a brain concentration of GlcNAcstatin G of 99 ng ml−1 (258 nM) (electronic supplementary material, table S1). Comparatively, the half-maximal effective concentration for GlcNAcstatin G determined in cultured HEK293 cells is 20 nM [72].
Brain lysates were probed with the pan-specific O-GlcNAc antibody RL2, revealing increased levels of protein O-GlcNAcylation, confirming inhibitor delivery to the brain (figure 1e). Immunoblotting using our site-specific Ser517 O-GlcNAc antibody (electronic supplementary material, figure S2) revealed elevated levels of this modification (figure 1e). These data provide evidence that site-specific O-GlcNAcylation of CRMP2 is both post-translational and dynamic.
2.4. CRMP2 phosphorylation by GSK3β is unchanged in Crmp2S517A mice
We next sought to clarify the physiological significance of CRMP2 O-GlcNAcylation in the vertebrate nervous system. To this effect, we generated a constitutive knock-in mouse model expressing endogenous CRMP2 that cannot be O-GlcNAcylated at Ser517 (Crmp2S517A) (electronic supplementary material, figure S4). Homozygous Crmp2S517A/S517A mice are viable, survive to adulthood and appear healthy, showing no gross differences in physical characteristics from wild-type animals. Consistent with our targeting strategy, western blot analysis confirmed that endogenous CRMP2 O-GlcNAcylation on Ser517 was abolished in mouse brain lysate (figure 2a and electronic supplementary material, figure S2B). Furthermore, mutant CRMP2 Ser517Ala protein is expressed at a similar level to the wild-type CRMP2 (figure 2b,c), indicating the mutation does not influence protein stability.
Driven by the hypothesis that O-GlcNAcylation obscures phosphorylation on overlapping phosphosite motifs (figure 1a), we assayed the phosphorylation status of endogenous CRMP2 in wild-type and mutant brain lysates using mass spectrometry. CRMP2 protein was purified via a two-step ion exchange chromatography protocol from wild-type and Crmp2S517A mouse brain lysate, digested and phospho-peptides enriched prior to LC-MS/MS analysis. Samples were isolated from two independent mouse cohorts: young mice aged 45–46 days (wild-type n = 4 and Crmp2S517A n = 4) and a mature adult group aged 178–182 days (wild-type n = 3 and Crmp2S517A n = 2). We detected phosphorylated peptides in both groups, with phosphorylation on Ser522 observed in young mice and on Thr509, Thr514, Ser518 and Ser522 in samples from mature adult animals. Since more single and multi-phosphorylated peptides were detected on CRMP2 in the mature adults than in young mice (electronic supplementary material, table S2) we further profiled the phosphorylation status of CRMP2 in six-month-old mice. As previous in vitro studies indicated that GSK3β-mediated phosphorylation of Thr514 is influenced by O-GlcNAcylation [38], we employed antibodies that recognize the triphospho- (P509/514/522, P509/514 antibody) or tetraphospho- (P509/514/518/522, 3F4 antibody) forms of CRMP2. Contrary to our hypothesis, there was no detectable change in poly-phosphorylation on CRMP2 at sites for GSK3β kinase (figure 2c–f). Our findings suggest that CRMP2 phosphorylation by GSK3β is unchanged in Crmp2S517A mice.
2.5. Loss of CRMP2 O-GlcNAcylation affects body weight
Animal weight is a well-established indicator of homeostasis and can reliably predict abnormal development, metabolism and neurological function. Decreased body weight was observed in conditional knock-out Crmp2−/− mice [56], yet this was not phenocopied in an independent Crmp2−/− knockout study [54]. As part of our overall characterization, we monitored longitudinal body weight in a cohort of gender-matched, littermate wild-type and Crmp2S517A animals from mixed 50–50% C57BL/6NTac and C57BL/6 J genetic backgrounds. Interestingly, we observed a consistent incidence of decreased body weight in Crmp2S517A mutants (repeated measures of ANOVA, p = 0.005) compared with their gender-matched siblings (figure 3a,b). Crmp2S517A homozygous mice exhibited on average a 3–5% reduction in weight compared with their wild-type siblings at 12, 16, 20 and 24 weeks old (paired Student's t-test, parametric two-tailed p-value = 0.0007, n = 13, at 24 weeks of age) (figure 3b; electronic supplementary material, table S3). In a separate experiment, body weight measurements were repeated on male animals only, prior to behavioural characterization. For these tests we used a littermate mouse cohort from a mixed genetic background with a higher proportion of C57BL/6 J (12.5% C57BL/6NTac and 87.5% C57BL/6 J). In this group, body weight was not significantly different between wild-type and homozygous knock-in animals at age 15 weeks (electronic supplementary material, figure S5). We anticipated that the metabolic characteristics of the genetic backgrounds of the mice probably influenced the contribution of CRMP2 signalling to overall body weight [73]. Our findings indicate that loss of CRMP2 O-GlcNAcylation potentially influences the regulation of mammalian body weight in a context-dependent fashion.
2.6. Crmp2S517A mice reveal normal gross brain development
Loss of Crmp2 in mice has been reported to result in abnormal brain development, characterized by enlarged lateral ventricles and aberrant dendrite development [56]. We evaluated gross neuroanatomy in Crmp2S517A and wild-type littermate animals at eight months old from mixed (50%/50%) C57BL/6NTac and C57BL/6 J genetic background (figure 3c–e). Conventional histological profiling of Crmp2S517A brains did not reveal any obvious defects in overall neuroanatomy (figure 3c). Next, we investigated neuronal and glial cell numbers in the hippocampus using stereological methods. Mutant animals exhibited parameters that were indistinguishable from those of their wild-type control counterparts (electronic supplementary material, figure S6A–C), indicating that CRMP2 O-GlcNAcylation does not affect cell viability in the mammalian nervous system.
CRMP2 is abundant in neurons of the central nervous system and is enriched in axons and synapses [56,74,75]. O-GlcNAcylated proteins, including CRMP2, have been identified on numerous proteins involved in organization and mobilization of synaptic vesicles at nerve termini [60,61,76]. We explored whether O-GlcNAcylation on CRMP2 is ubiquitous or specific to a cellular compartment or part of the brain. O-GlcNAcylated CRMP2 was detected in fractions of both cytosol and synaptosomes in all sub-dissected regions of the brain, suggesting this modification is ubiquitous (figure 3f,g). Our data demonstrate that site-specific CRMP2 O-GlcNAcylation at Ser517 is a widespread modification in the nervous system, and is dispensable for gross brain development.
2.7. Crmp2S517A mutant mice exhibit selective defects in short-term memory
Missense mutations in Ogt lead to intellectual disability, possibly due to changes in the O-GlcNAc proteome [22–26,77]. CRMP2, as one of the most abundant brain O-GlcNAc proteins and a node in axonal guidance signalling, is a candidate effector of this phenotype. To determine whether loss of O-GlcNAc on CRMP2 function affects neuronal function, we conducted comprehensive behavioural profiling of our Crmp2S517A mice. Previous studies have demonstrated that Crmp2−/− knock-out mice exhibit increased locomotor activity, impaired spatial memory formation and abnormal social behaviour [54,56]. Here, we performed novel object recognition (NOR), open-field and spontaneous alternation tests to assess short-term recognition memory, anxiety and spatial working memory, respectively. In addition, locomotor activity was evaluated to identify a possible link to the observed mild weight phenotype. Male Crmp2S517A knock-in mice and wild-type littermate controls (n = 10–12 per group) from mixed 12.5% C57BL/6NTac and 87.5% C57BL/6 J genetic background were used at 10–13 weeks old at the start of behavioural testing, reaching 22–25 weeks old at the end of the tests.
First, we performed open-field tests to measure anxiety and simultaneously assess locomotor activity (electronic supplementary material, figure S7A–C). Here, there was no significant difference between Crmp2S517A knock-in mice and wild-type controls in the time spent in the inner/outer zone (electronic supplementary material, figure S7B) and time spent moving in the outer zone (electronic supplementary material, figure S7C), indicating that neither anxiety nor locomotor function of the Crmp2S517A animals are affected.
We next performed an NOR test to assess short-term hippocampal and entorhinal cortex cognitive function (figure 4a–f). This test is based upon the natural instinct of mice to explore novelty, measuring the time the mice explore a novel object versus a familiar object. A calculated discrimination index (D3) of greater than 0.2 indicates that the animal is able to distinguish between the familiar and the novel object. The Crmp2S517A mice, however, completed the NOR task with D3 < 0.2 (figure 4d), significantly lower than wild-type controls (Student's t-test, p < 0.05), indicating that they were less able to differentiate between new and previously experienced objects. The NOR test also revealed that the Crmp2S517A mice were less mobile during the test phase (Student's t-test, p < 0.01), travelling shorter distances with lower maximal speed (figure 4b,c), thus pointing to a possible effect on motivation to explore. Of note, there was a significant positive correlation between the D3 index and distance travelled (r = 0.53, p < 0.05) (figure 4e). In contrast, there was no correlation between the D3 index and body weight (figure 4f), suggesting that the cognitive phenotype was independent from the weight phenotype.
The observed memory deficit in the NOR task prompted us to investigate memory-related behaviour further. To probe possible deficits in hippocampus-dependent spatial working memory in the Crmp2S517A knock-in mice, we subjected the mice to spontaneous alternation tests in an enclosed plus maze (electronic supplementary material, figure S7D). Individual mice were placed in the centre of the maze and allowed to explore for 15 min. The Crmp2S517A and wild-type mice performed a similar number of total arm entries (electronic supplementary material, figure S7E) and similar percentages of spontaneous alternation (electronic supplementary material, figure S7F), indicating that hippocampus-related spatial memory is not affected but that the observed object recognition memory impairment is likely to be specific to parahippocampal cortical region. Taken together, our study reveals an important association between CRMP2 O-GlcNAcylation status and short-term memory.
3. Concluding remarks
Our study sought to decipher the in vivo significance of a single site-specific O-GlcNAc modification on CRMP2. Despite the considerable functional redundancy between members of the CRMP protein family [54,78–80], with multiple post-translational modifications regulating CRMP2 function, we uncovered selective metabolic and neural phenotypes associated with the loss of CRMP2 O-GlcNAcylation.
The phenotypes observed in Crmp2S517A are more modest and selective than those of both the Crmp2 knock-out and the Crmp2S522A knock-in models that are deficient in Cdk5/GSK3β-mediated phosphorylation. While Crmp2−/− knock-out mice have increased lateral ventricles [56], gross brain development appeared normal in both Crmp2S522A [81] and our Crmp2S517A mutant mice reported here. In terms of motor function and cognition, there was little overlap between those observed in Crmp2S517A, Crmp2−/− and Crmp2S522A models. Crmp2−/− mice showed increased locomotion [55,56], while locomotion was not affected in Crmp2S522A mice [82]. Interestingly, our Crmp2S517A mutant animals exhibited signs of altered locomotion during the NOR task, exhibiting less movement at lower speed specifically in the test phase. Despite this selective phenotype, such defects were not present in the plus maze and open-field tests.
Intriguingly, learning and short-term memory were selectively impaired in Crmp2S517A mice, as revealed in the NOR task, which requires orchestrated input from several brain regions including insular cortex, perirhinal cortex, ventromedial prefrontal cortex and hippocampus [83]. In contrast to our knock-in observations, cognitive impairments in Crmp2−/− mice are primarily hippocampus-centric, where CRMP2 is highly expressed [84]. Spatial and contextual learning abilities were also reduced in Crmp2−/− mice, yet such a direct comparison with these previous studies is challenging, owing to background and experimenter variability.
We detected a reduction in body weight in our first cohort of Crmp2S517A mice, but not in the second cohort with a higher (87.5%) contribution of the C57BL/6 J background. The C57BL/6 J variant mice contain a deletion within the nicotinamide nucleotide transhydrogenase (Nnt), a nuclear gene that encodes a mitochondrial inner membrane protein that maintains intramitochondrial redox homeostasis. Loss of Nnt is associated with numerous phenotypic consequences, including altered glucose homeostasis [85] and weight gain in male mice [86]. Moreover, loss of Nnt is known to modify behavioural and neuroendocrine regulation in mice [87] and also influences the severity of phenotypes arising from pathological mutations [88]. Similarly to our observation, the brain-specific Crmp2−/− knock out mice showed a reduction in weight [55,56] whereas the total Crmp2−/− deficient mice did not [55], suggesting that this phenotype might manifest only in certain genetic backgrounds.
The Crmp2S517A mice displayed behavioural phenotypes distinct from those observed in Crmp2−/− or Crmp2S522A mice, suggesting the Ser517Ala mutation neither blocks CRMP2 function severely nor affects Ser522 phosphorylation. Owing to the close proximity of Ser517 to Cdk5/GSK3β phosphosites and previous peptide-based studies predicting phosphorylation/O-GlcNAcylation interplay, we hypothesized that the Ser517Ala mutation would alter CRMP2 phosphorylation, with potential effects on microtubule interactions and downstream neuronal phenotypes. However, neither behavioural nor biochemical characterization has provided evidence that the observed phenotypes are underpinned by altered phosphorylation status in vivo. It is conceivable that compensatory alterations in expression and activity of other CRMP family members [55,82] could mask any direct effects of the Ser517Ala mutation.
Ser517 resides in the structurally flexible C-terminal tail of CRMP2 required for stabilizing homo/hetero CRMP tetramers [89,90]. A crystal structure of the CRMP2 tetramer with a partially truncated C-terminal tail (CRMP2 1-525) revealed extensive intermolecular interactions involving the C-terminus [89]. It has also been shown that the C-terminal tail mediates binding to the microtubule network [89]. Therefore, a possible molecular mechanism underpinning the behavioural phenotypes is that O-GlcNAcylation on the CRMP2 C-terminal tail could affect tetramer formation, stability and microtubule-lattice binding, which will require further investigation. Taken together, our data support a robust regulatory network for CRMP2 function and a fine-tuning role for O-GlcNAcylation on Ser517 that plays an important role in memory formation and neuronal plasticity in mammals.
Altered protein O-GlcNAcylation has been proposed as a possible contributing factor to the development of AD. Hyperphosphorylation of CRMP2 has been observed in neurofibrillary tangles in AD brains [41]. Studies on mouse models of AD have demonstrated that CRMP2 hyper-phosphorylation is an early event during the development of AD and occurs prior to plaque and tangle formation [41,42]. This inspired us to study how O-GlcNAcylation potentially regulates phosphorylation on CRMP2 and whether the stoichiometry of O-GlcNAcylated versus unmodified CRMP2 is reduced in AD. We did not find a significant increase of O-GlcNAcylation on CRMP2 in AD compared with age-matched individuals. In addition, no large global changes in CRMP2 phosphorylation were detected in vivo owing to the absence of O-GlcNAcylation. However, detection of such changes is challenging because of the potentially low stoichiometry of CRMP2 O-GlcNAcylation in tissue.
For over 30 years, functional dissection of protein O-GlcNAcylation has been mostly limited to genetic and pharmacological manipulation of OGT and OGA, key enzymes responsible for O-GlcNAc cycling. These studies have highlighted the role of O-GlcNAc in several physiological contexts. Importantly, research on cell culture models has also uncovered the function of O-GlcNAc on a few defined target proteins in specific cellular processes. Despite this large body of work, research on the significance of O-GlcNAcylation on discrete sites of specific proteins in vivo is scarce. Such data are ultimately required for a complete mechanistic understanding of the phenotypes observed in Oga−/− or Ogt−/− models and human disease states associated with disrupted O-GlcNAc homeostasis. Our findings constitute an important advance towards a protein-specific understanding of O-GlcNAcylation in the mammalian nervous system. Future studies will be essential to decipher the complex interplay between O-GlcNAcylation and other post-translational modifications.
4. Material and methods
4.1. Antibodies
Rabbit anti-gSer517 OG-CRMP2 (1 : 1000) raised for this study by the van Aalten laboratory
Rabbit anti-CRMP2 (1 : 2000) Millipore
Rabbit anti-CRMP2 (1 : 2500) Cell Signalling 9393
Rabbit anti-pan-TUC (CRMP) (1 : 10 000) Millipore ABN108
Sheep anti-P-T509/514 CRMP2 (1 : 2000) with dephospho-peptide [58]
Mouse anti-O-GlcNAc /RL2 (1 : 2000) Abcam ab2739
Mouse anti-FLAG (M2) (1 : 5000) Sigma
Mouse anti-PSD95 (SAP90, DLG4) (108E10) SYSY
Rabbit anti-GAPDH (FL-335) (1 : 1000) Santa Cruz sc-25778
Goat anti-GATA-2 (0.5 µg ml−1) R&D Systems AF2046
Mouse 3F4 (1 µg ml−1) Takara 29060
Mouse NeuN (A60) (1 : 2000) Millipore MAB377
Licor 680, Licor 800
4.2. Purification of CRMP from brain tissue
CRMPs were purified from sheep brain by employing three rounds of ion exchange chromatography protocol as previously described [91]. Briefly, sheep brain tissue (100 g) was homogenized in three volumes of DEAE buffer (25 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.8) containing 2 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) using an Emulsiflex continuous flow cell disruptor (Constant). The tissue lysate was centrifuged at 100 000g for 45 min at 4°C. The supernatants from two centrifugations were combined and applied to a 10 ml DEAE-Sephadex column (Sigma) equilibrated with DEAE buffer. After several washes with DEAE buffer, bound proteins were eluted with a 100, 200 and 300 mM NaCl step gradient in DEAE buffer. Peak CRMP-containing fractions in the 200 mM NaCl elution were combined, diluted 10-fold with S buffer (25 mM sodium phosphate (pH 6.0) containing 2 mM DTT) and applied to a 5 ml SP-Sepharose column equilibrated with S buffer. After washing, proteins were eluted with 150 mM NaCl in S buffer. Peak CRMP-containing fractions were pooled and diluted fivefold with HA buffer (10 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.0) containing 2 mM DTT). The diluted sample was applied to a 3 ml hydroxyapatite column (Bio-gel HTP; Bio-Rad) and eluted with a linear gradient of 10–100 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.0) containing 2 mM DTT, and peak CRMP-containing fractions were pooled. All steps were performed on ice or at 4°C. CRMP protein purification was monitored by anti-CRMP immunoblotting.
4.3. Enrichment of O-GlcNAc-CRMPs
GST-CpOGAD298N was expressed in BL21(DE3)pLysS Escherichia coli and cells were suspended in 25 mM Tris/250 mM NaCl, pH 7.5 buffer containing 0.1 mg ml−1 DNAse, 1 mg ml−1 lysozyme and protease inhibitors 1 mM benzamidine, 0.2 mM PMSF and 5 µM leupeptin, and lysed by homogenization with an EmulsiFlex-C3 (Avestin). After centrifugation at 40 000g for 20 min, the supernatant containing GST-CpOGAD298N was bound to Glutathione Sepharose 4B beads for 45 min at 4°C and washed with 25 mM Tris/250 mM NaCl, pH 7.5. Purified sheep CRMP2 (6 mg) was exposed to GST-CpOGAD298N bound to beads for 90 min at 4°C in 1 ml of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), 0.01% CHAPS. O-GlcNAcylated protein was eluted with 0.2 ml 0.75 M GlcNAc for 2 × 5 min. A total output of approximately 1 µg glyco-enriched CRMP2 was obtained.
4.4. O-GlcNAc site mapping of CRMP2
Sample preparation for mass spectrometry: 500 ng of glyco-enriched CRMP2 was subjected to 10% sodium dodecylsulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) in a concentrated band of 0.5 cm, followed by manual enzymatic digestion as previously reported [92] with minor modifications. Briefly, excised bands were rinsed three times with AmBic buffer that consisted of 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate in 50% methanol (high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) grade; Merck) following a reduction step with 10 mM DTT (Sigma-Aldrich). Subsequently, the gel pieces were rinsed twice with AmBic buffer and dried in a SpeedVac before alkylation with 55 mM iodoacetamide (Sigma-Aldrich) in 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate. The gel pieces were rinsed with AmBic buffer before being dehydrated by addition of acetonitrile (HPLC grade; Merck) and drying in a SpeedVac. Trypsin (Promega, Madison, WI) was added to the dry gel pieces at a final concentration of 20 ng µl−1 in 20 mM ammonium bicarbonate, and then incubating them at 37°C for 16 h. Peptides were extracted three times by 20 min incubation in 40 µl of 60% acetonitrile in 0.5% HCOOH. The resulting peptide extracts were pooled, concentrated in a SpeedVac and stored at −20°C until analysis by mass spectrometry.
Identification of the O-GlcNAcylated proteins and mapping of O-GlcNAc sites was performed by electrospray ion trap electron transfer dissociation (ESI-IT-ETD) mass spectrometry coupled to a nano-LC system (Ultimate 3000 RSLC; Dionex, Netherlands). Dried peptides were resuspended in 30 µl of 0.5% HCOOH and 10 µl was injected for mass spectrometric analysis. Tryptic peptides were concentrated on a trap column (2 cm × 100 µm, Dionex) at 10 µl min−1 and separated on a 15 cm × 75 µm Pepmap C18 reversed-phase column (Thermo Fischer Scientific). Peptides were eluted by a linear 60 min gradient of 95% A/5% B to 90% B (A: H2O, 0.1% HCOOH; B: 80% acetonitrile, 0.08% HCOOH) at 300 nl min−1 into an LTQ Velos ETD (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Mass spectrometry spectra were acquired in positive mode: firstly mass spectrometer full scans were acquired followed by MS/MS in ETD mode. Up to 10 of the most intense precursors were selected for ETD fragmentation with an activation time of 300 ms and non-dynamic exclusion. Proteome Discoverer v 1.4.0.288 software (Thermo Scientific) was used to process raw LC-MS/MS data, applying the Mascot (version 2.4; Matrix Science, Boston, MA, USA) search engine algorithm against the SwissProt database with the following Mascot parameters: 2+, 3+, 4+ and 5+ ions; precursor mass tolerance 10 ppm; Da; fragment tolerance 0.6 Da and up to two missed cleavages. The variable modifications included were: oxidation (M) (15.99 Da), dioxidation (M) (31.98 Da) and HexNAc (ST) (+203.0794 Da). All MS/MS data and database results were manually inspected to verify accurate assignment of fragment ions using the above software. Peptides with E-value < 0.1 are considered as a precise O-GlcNAc site assignment.
4.5. Phosphorylation analysis of CRMP from mouse brain tissue samples
CRMPs were purified from single mouse brain samples one by one by employing two rounds of ion exchange chromatography. We followed the same protocol as for CRMP purification from sheep brain described earlier without carrying out the third chromatography step on the hydroxyapatite column. For phosphopeptide analysis, purified CRMP2 was first reduced and alkylated by addition of 10 mM TCEP and 40 mM chloroacetamide. CRMP2 was then digested by addition of LysC (1 : 100 ratio LysC : CRMP2) followed by trypsin (1 : 25 ratio trypsin : CRMP2) at 37°C overnight. The resulting peptides were desalted using Sep-Pak cartridges (Waters) and phosphopeptides enriched using Fe-IMAC according to a previously described procedure [93]. LC-MS/MS analysis was performed on an Agilent 1290 UPLC system (Agilent) coupled to an Orbitrap Fusion Tribrid mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The phosphopeptides were trapped and eluted using a gradient of 8–44% B over 70 min where buffer A was H2O containing 0.1% formic acid and buffer B was 80% acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid. EThcD was used to fragment the peptides with 40% supplemental activation set and an activation time of 50 ms. Raw data were analysed using Byonic software (Protein Metrics Inc.) using the following parameters: precursor ion tolerance 10 ppm, product ion mass tolerance 20 ppm. Cys carbaminomethylation was set as a fixed modification and Met oxidation and STY phosphorylation as variable modifications. The number of mis-cleavages was set to 5. The phosphosites identified were manually confirmed to ensure 100% confidence for phosphosite localization.
4.6. Generation of O-GlcNAc-specific antibody against Ser517 on CRMP2
A polyclonal O-GlcNAc-specific antibody against Ser517 on CRMP2 was generated using a previously described approach [94] with some modifications. The O-GlcNAc peptide CKTVTPA[O-GlcNAc]SSAKTSPA and the matching unmodified peptide corresponding to residues 511–524 of human CRMP2 were synthesized on a Liberty microwave-assisted peptide synthesizer (CEM) using MBHA Rink-amide low-load resin (Novabiochem) with standard protocols of Fmoc SPS chemistry. 4Ac-GlcNAcSerFmoc was synthesized in-house following a published procedure [95]. The peptides were purified using HPLC and conjugated to keyhole limpet haemocyanin (KLH) prior to injection into rabbits. Antibodies from the serum were purified following a two-step affinity purification protocol, first over a non-GlcNAcylated peptide column, then subsequently over a GlcNAcylated peptide column (Dundee Cell Product). The non-GlcNAc-CRMP2 antibody fraction was retained on the first column and the GlcNAc-CRMP2-specific antibodies were collected in the flow through. This fraction was then loaded onto a GlcNAc-CRMP2 peptide column to purify the GlcNAc-CRMP2-specific antibody from other immunoglobulins. We probed antibody specificity using recombinant CRMP2, where it recognized the in vitro O-GlcNAcylated CRMP2 but not the non-glycosylated or the Ser517Ala point mutant CRMP2 (electronic supplementary material, figure S2A). Gratifyingly, this antibody was also able to recognize O-GlcNAc CRMP2 as a single band on western blot in mouse brain lysate (electronic supplementary material, figure S2B). We further explored antibody specificity on mouse brain lysate treated with CpOGA, a bacterial O-GlcNAcase from Clostridium perfringens, possessing a high-level hydrolytic activity on eukaryotic O-GlcNAc proteins. The antibody did not react with naked CRMP2 as removal of all O-GlcNAc modification from proteins abolished its detection.
4.7. DNA cloning
C-terminally truncated CRMP2 1-536 was inserted into pGEX6P1 vector, containing an ampicillin resistance cassette, for recombinant protein production in E. coli and into pRK-Flag plasmid for transfection of mammalian cells. The Ser517Ala mutation in CRMP2 was introduced following the QuickChange method (Stratagene) using KOD Hot Start Polymerase (Novagen) and verified by sequencing. Constructs for CpOGA and GST-CpOGAD298N (amino acids 31–618) expression were described before [62,96].
4.8. Protein expression and purification
GST-tagged CRMP2 (amino acids 1–536) was expressed in BL21 E.coli and purified on a Glutathione Sepharose 4B column and cleaved using PreScission Protease. Recombinant OGT was produced as previously described [65]. Expression of CpOGA and GST-CpOGAD298N was reported previously [62,96].
4.9. In vitro O-GlcNAcylation and CpOGA reaction
Purified recombinant CRMP2 was O-GlcNAcylated in vitro in a reaction mixture containing 250 nM recombinant human OGT, 1 µM CRMP2, 100 µM UDP-N-acetylglucosamine incubated for 60 min at 37°C. Aliquots of 100 µg of mouse brain lysates were incubated with 15 µg of CpOGA for 60 min at 30°C in order to remove O-GlcNAc modification and to elucidate the specificity of the gSer517-CRMP2 antibody.
4.10. Cell culture
The Neuro-2a mouse neuroblastoma cell line was maintained in Dulbecco's modified minimal essential medium (DMEM) (Life Technologies, Inc., Burlington, ON) supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal calf serum (Life Technologies, Inc.), L-glutamine (2 mM), penicillin (100 units ml−1) and streptomycin (100 µg ml−1; Life Technologies, Inc.) at 37 °C, under 5% CO2. Cells were transfected using polyethylenimine (PEI) using a 3 : 1 ratio of PEI to DNA (w/w) diluted in serum-free DMEM. After 48 h of transfection, the cell culture medium was changed and cells were treated with 25 µg ml−1 cycloheximide (CHX) alone for 6 h then supplemented with 1 µM GlcNAcstatin G (GlycoBioChem) for an additional 16 h.
4.11. Immunoprecipitation with anti-Flag antibody
Cell lysates obtained from Neuro2a cells expressing Flag-CRMP2 were incubated with anti-Flag M2 agarose beads (Sigma, A2220) overnight in the cold room. Beads were washed with cold PBS three times and Flag-CRMP2 was eluted with SDS sample buffer; 1% 2-mercaptoethanol was added prior to running the samples on SDS-PAGE gels.
4.12. Western blotting
Mouse brain tissue was rapidly dissected, rinsed in cold PBS, snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C. For immunoblotting cells/tissue were lysed in 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 0.1 mM EGTA, 1 mM EDTA, 1% Triton-X100, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 50 mM sodium fluoride, 5 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 0.27 M sucrose, 0.1% 2-mercaptoethanol supplemented with protease inhibitors (1 mM benzamidine, 0.2 mM PMSF and 5 µM leupeptin) and 10 µm GlcNAcstatin G. For CpOGA treatment GlcNAcstatin G was omitted from the lysis buffer. Cell lysate was centrifuged at 14 000 rpm for 20 min at 4°C and the protein concentration was determined with the Pierce 660 nm protein assay. A total of 20–30 µg of protein was denatured in SDS loading buffer containing 1% 2-mercaptoethanol or 200 mM DTT. Proteins were separated on precast 8% NuPAGE Bis-Tris Acrylamide gels (Invitrogen) by SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose membrane. Membranes were incubated with primary antibodies in blocking buffer, 5% bovine serum albumin in TBST (Tris-buffered saline with 0.1% Tween-20) overnight at 4°C and next with IR680/800-labelled secondary antibodies at room temperature for 1 h. Blots were imaged using the Li-Cor Odyssey infrared imaging system (Li-Cor) and Image Studio Lite software.
4.13. Sample preparation from human post-mortem tissue
Human post-mortem tissue samples (control n = 10 hippocampus, age range 17–89, AD n = 5 hippocampus, age range 75–80) were obtained from the MRC London Neurodegenerative Disease Brain Bank and the MRC Sudden Death Brain and Tissue Bank, University of Edinburgh, UK. Frozen tissue was hand-homogenized in a glass Dounce homogenizer in ice-cold standard tissue lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 1% Triton X-100, 0.1 M EGTA, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM Na3VO4, 50 mM NaF, 5 mM Na PyroP, 0.27 M sucrose, 0.1% β-mercaptoethanol containing Complete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail), followed by centrifugation at 20 000g (15 min, 4°C) and the supernatant collected.
4.14. GlcNAcstatin G continuous infusion
Alzet osmotic pumps (model: 2001D) loaded with GlcNAcstatin G (200 µl formulated in 50% DMSO, 25% PEG400, 25% sterile water; 10 mg ml−1; n = 4 mice) or vehicle alone (200 µl formulated in 50% DMSO, 25% PEG400; 25% sterile water; n = 3 mice) were implanted subcutaneously between the shoulder blades of anaesthetized female NMRI mice. A cannula from the pump was inserted into the jugular vein. Mice were housed in standard holding cages with water and food available ad libitum and 12 h/12 h light/dark cycle throughout the study. At 24 h post implant a terminal blood sample was taken from each mouse and brain was harvested for biochemical analysis. One mouse from the GlcNacstatin G-infused group was used for pharmacokinetics analysis only. Spot blood samples (10 µl) were taken from this mouse at 15, 30 min, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 21 h, followed by a terminal blood sample at 24 h and harvesting of brain for bioanalysis (electronic supplementary material, table S1).
4.15. Generation of Crmp2S517A mice
Crmp2S517A mice were generated by TaconicArtemis GmbH (electronic supplementary material, figure S4). Briefly, the CRMP2 coding sequence spanning exons 12–14 was targeted by homologous recombination in C57BL/6NTac (Art B6 3.6) mouse embryonic stem cells. The construct coding for the Ser517Ala also contained an FRT-flanked puromycin resistance cassette in the intronic region between intron 13 and 14, allowing for selection for recombination events (electronic supplementary material, figure S4). A total of 10–15 cells from selected ES colonies bearing the Ser517Ala mutation were injected into 3.5-day-old blastocyst embryos of BALB/c mice. After recovery, embryos were transferred to pseudo-pregnant NMRI female mice. Chimeric progenies were crossed with Flp deleter C57BL/6-Tg(CAG-Flpe)2 Arte mice and heterozygous pups carrying the Ser517Ala mutation but lacking the puromycin resistance cassette were selected. These founder heterozygous mice were crossed with C57BL/6 J wild-type animals. The line was initially bred by inter-crossing heterozygous animals, then maintained by backcrossing to the C57BL/6 J genetic background.
Genotyping was performed by diagnostic polymerase chain reaction using KOD Hot Start DNA polymerase (EMD Millipore) on genomic DNA isolated from tissue biopsy with forward 5′-TTGTTAAAGAATGTGGAACTGGG-3′ and reverse 5′-AAGTGTTCCTCATTCCTCATGG-3′ primers that amplified a 385 bp fragment of the knock-in or a 310 bp fragment of the wild-type allele. All animal studies and breeding were performed in accordance with the Animal Scientific Procedures Act of 1986.
4.16. Histology and immunohistochemistry
Eleven animals, five wild-type and six homozygous Crmp2S517A mice, were sacrificed for assessing gross brain development. Mice under terminal anaesthesia (Euthatal 9 mg kg−1) were subjected to cardiac perfusion firstly with PBS and then with 4% paraformaldehyde. Brains were quickly dissected and post-fixed by immersion in 4% paraformaldehyde in 200 mM phosphate buffer pH for overnight fixation. Following a brief wash in PBS, they were placed in 25% sucrose. We ensured an approximately 20-fold volumetric excess of solution to tissue at all stages.
In order to eliminate bias, samples were blinded and then processed and scored by an independent researcher. A 1 : 12 series of sections was used for Nissl staining using cresyl violet. A further 1 : 12 series was processed for immunohistochemistry with mouse NeuN (A60, Millipore, MAB377, 1 : 2000) primary antibody specific to neurons and visualized with horseradish peroxidase-linked secondary antibody (1 : 200).
4.17. Subcellular fractionation
The synaptoneurosome fraction was purified as previously described [97]. Briefly, mouse brain tissue samples were collected and snap frozen in liquid nitrogen. The tissue was later homogenized in a pre-chilled Dounce homogenizer with 2 ml ice-cold buffer A (25 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 120 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2 and 2 mM CaCl2) supplemented with 2 mM DTT, protease inhibitors (1 mM benzamidine, 0.2 mM PMSF and 5 µM leupeptin) and phosphatase inhibitors (1 mM Na3VO4, 50 mM NaF and 5 mM Na PyroP). The lysate was cleared by passing it through two layers of 80 μm nylon filters (Millipore, NY8002500) to remove tissue debris. Total extract sample was prepared at this stage. The synaptoneurosomes fraction was purified by passing the homogenate through a 5 µm Supor membrane filter (Pall Corp., Port Washington, NY) and then spinning down at 1000g for 5 min. This yielded the supernatant used for obtaining the cytosol fraction and a pellet containing synaptoneurosomes. The supernatant was subjected to a 1 h centrifugation at 100 000g to clear the cytosol fraction. The synaptoneurosome pellet was further washed once with buffer A and centrifuged. The pellet was resuspended in 0.5 ml buffer B (50 mM Tris pH 7.5, 1.5% SDS, 2 mM DTT), and boiled for 5 min.
4.18. Body weight measurement
Heterozygous pairs of CRMP2S517A/+ animals on a 50%/50% C57BL 6 J/6NTac mixed genetic background were used to obtain experimental animals for body weight measurements. Wild-type and homozygous Crmp2S517A mice were housed together in the same cage in groups and fed with standard chow. Body weights of approximately 13 male and approximately 13 female mice were followed weekly between three and six months of age. Data collection was performed by an independent observer in a blinded manner.
One out of seven wild-type male mice had an unusually low body weight compared with the wild-type dataset (20.39 g at 12 weeks, 22.66 g at 16 weeks, 23.38 at 20 weeks and 24.14 g at 24 weeks of age), otherwise no illness was reported. We have excluded this mouse from our data analysis.
4.19. Behavioural testing
Prior to any behavioural testing, all animals experienced daily handling by the experimenter for two weeks. This process ensured that the animals were accustomed to being picked up and handled by the experimenter and vice versa. All handling took place in the experimental room at the same time each day. Male Crmp2S517A knock-in and wild-type littermate control (n = 8–12 per group) animals from 12.5% C57BL/6NTac and 87.5% C57BL/6 J genetic background participated in the study. All animals were housed in groups. Animals were 10–13 weeks old at the start of behavioural testing, reaching 22–25 weeks old at the end. The experiment was performed blind, with the experimenters unaware of genotype while performing the test and analysing the data.
4.20. Novel object recognition test
Cognition was assessed by the NOR test. During the familiarization phase, the animal is exposed to two identical objects for 10 min. Following an inter-phase interval for 10 min, the animal is exposed to a single copy of the familiar object and a novel object (test phase). Discrimination index (D3) was calculated [98]:
4.21. Open-field test
The activity of mice in an open-field maze was recorded. Time spent in the centre and periphery and time moving in the periphery were analysed to investigate parameters of locomotion and anxiety. The test started by placing the mice in the middle of the open-field cage and each animal was allowed to explore for 15 min.
4.22. Spontaneous alternation test
The spontaneous alternation test performed in an enclosed plus maze was used to assess spatial working memory. Individual mice were placed in the centre of the maze and allowed to explore for 15 min. Each arm entry was recorded to calculate the percentage of spontaneous alternation. Mice that were able to remember which arms they had entered most recently would choose a different one to explore,
4.23. Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed with Prism 6 and SPSS software packages. For pairwise comparisons of wild-type and Crmp2S517A data the Student's t-test was used. Unpaired t-tests were calculated for independent samples; paired t-tests were used when littermate correlation was apparent. For body weight data, ANOVA with repeated measures was performed. Test of between-subject effects indicated the significant effect of genotype on body weight.
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We thank Vladimir Borodkin and Andrew Ferenbach for their invaluable contribution with peptide synthesis and molecular biology, respectively. We thank and acknowledge Frederick Simeons and Laste Stojanovski for carrying out the osmotic pump studies. We thank Arron Dow for performing the animal behavioural studies. We also thank our departmental support teams for their assistance (Medical Research Council Genotyping and Tissue Culture teams) and the School of Life Sciences Biological Services (all resource units) for the essential management, maintenance and husbandry of mice.
Ethics
All animal studies and breeding in Dundee were approved by the University of Dundee ethics review committee, and further subjected to approved study plans by the Named Veterinary Surgeon and Compliance Officer (Dr Ngaire Dennison) and performed under a UK Home Office project licence in accordance with the Animal Scientific Procedures Act (ASPA, 1986).
Data accessibility
This article has no additional data.
Authors' contributions
V.M. and D.M.F.v.A. conceived the study; V.M., R.H., R.W., T.G.M. and M.S. planned and performed experiments; J.A. and A.C.L. performed and analysed mass spectrometry; A.D.M. performed and analysed behavioural studies; K.D.R. oversaw the DMPK studies, V.M. analysed and interpreted the data and V.M., R.W. and D.M.F.v.A. wrote the manuscript with input from all authors.
Competing interests
The University of Dundee holds a patent for the GlcNAcstatin G inhibitor.
Funding
This work was funded by a Wellcome Trust Senior Research Fellowship (WT087590MA) to D.M.F.v.A., an ARUK Pilot Project grant to R.W., and support from Tenovus Scotland to V.M. The phosphoproteomics mass spectrometry work was supported by the Horizon 2020 program INFRAIA project Epic-XS (project 823839) to A.J.R.H.
References
- 1.Holt GD, Snow CM, Senior A, Haltiwanger RS, Gerace L, Hart GW. 1987. Nuclear pore complex glycoproteins contain cytoplasmically disposed O-linked N-acetylglucosamine. J. Cell Biol. 104, 1157–1164. ( 10.1083/jcb.104.5.1157) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hart GW. 2019. Nutrient regulation of signaling and transcription. J. Biol. Chem. 294, 2211–2231. ( 10.1074/jbc.AW119.003226) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zachara NE. 2018. Critical observations that shaped our understanding of the function(s) of intracellular glycosylation (O-GlcNAc). FEBS Lett. 592, 3950–3975. ( 10.1002/1873-3468.13286) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wells L, Vosseller K, Hart GW. 2003. A role for N-acetylglucosamine as a nutrient sensor and mediator of insulin resistance. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 60, 222–228. ( 10.1007/s000180300017) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lee A, Miller D, Henry R, Paruchuri VD, O'Meally RN, Boronina T, Cole RN, Zachara NE. 2016. Combined antibody/lectin-enrichment identifies extensive changes in the O-GlcNAc sub-proteome upon oxidative stress. J. Proteome Res. 15, 4318–4336. ( 10.1021/acs.jproteome.6b00369) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Slawson C, Copeland RJ, Hart GW. 2010. O-GlcNAc signaling: a metabolic link between diabetes and cancer? Trends Biochem. Sci. 35, 547–555. ( 10.1016/j.tibs.2010.04.005) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lazarus BD, Love DC, Hanover JA. 2009. O-GlcNAc cycling: implications for neurodegenerative disorders. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 41, 2134–2146. ( 10.1016/j.biocel.2009.03.008) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kreppel LK, Blomberg MA, Hart GW. 1997. Dynamic glycosylation of nuclear and cytosolic proteins. Cloning and characterization of a unique O-GlcNAc transferase with multiple tetratricopeptide repeats. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 9308–9315. ( 10.1074/jbc.272.14.9308) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lubas WA, Frank DW, Krause M, Hanover JA. 1997. O-Linked GlcNAc transferase is a conserved nucleocytoplasmic protein containing tetratricopeptide repeats. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 9316–9324. ( 10.1074/jbc.272.14.9316) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Dong DL, Hart GW. 1994. Purification and characterization of an O-GlcNAc selective N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase from rat spleen cytosol. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 19 321–19 330. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Webster DM, Teo CF, Sun Y, Wloga D, Gay S, Klonowski KD, Wells L, Dougan ST. 2009. O-GlcNAc modifications regulate cell survival and epiboly during zebrafish development. BMC Dev. Biol. 9, 28 ( 10.1186/1471-213X-9-28) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Shafi R, Iyer SP, Ellies LG, O'Donnell N, Marek KW, Chui D, Hart GW, Marth JD. 2000. The O-GlcNAc transferase gene resides on the X chromosome and is essential for embryonic stem cell viability and mouse ontogeny. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 5735–5739. ( 10.1073/pnas.100471497) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kenwrick S, Amaya E, Papalopulu N. 2004. Pilot morpholino screen in Xenopus tropicalis identifies a novel gene involved in head development. Dev. Dyn. 229, 289–299. ( 10.1002/dvdy.10440) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gambetta MC, Oktaba K, Muller J. 2009. Essential role of the glycosyltransferase Sxc/Ogt in polycomb repression. Science 325, 93–96. ( 10.1126/science.1169727) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Yang YR, et al. 2012. O-GlcNAcase is essential for embryonic development and maintenance of genomic stability. Aging Cell 11, 439–448. ( 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2012.00801.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Keembiyehetty C, Love DC, Harwood KR, Gavrilova O, Comly ME, Hanover JA. 2015. Conditional knock-out reveals a requirement for O-linked N-acetylglucosaminase (O-GlcNAcase) in metabolic homeostasis. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 7097–7113. ( 10.1074/jbc.M114.617779) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.O'Donnell N, Zachara NE, Hart GW, Marth JD. 2004. Ogt-dependent X-chromosome-linked protein glycosylation is a requisite modification in somatic cell function and embryo viability. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 1680–1690. ( 10.1128/MCB.24.4.1680-1690.2004) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wang AC, Jensen EH, Rexach JE, Vinters HV, Hsieh-Wilson LC. 2016. Loss of O-GlcNAc glycosylation in forebrain excitatory neurons induces neurodegeneration. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 15 120–15 125. ( 10.1073/pnas.1606899113) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lagerlof O, Slocomb JE, Hong I, Aponte Y, Blackshaw S, Hart GW, Huganir RL. 2016. The nutrient sensor OGT in PVN neurons regulates feeding. Science 351, 1293–1296. ( 10.1126/science.aad5494) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ruan HB, et al. 2014. O-GlcNAc transferase enables AgRP neurons to suppress browning of white fat. Cell 159, 306–317. ( 10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.010) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lagerlof O, Hart GW, Huganir RL. 2017. O-GlcNAc transferase regulates excitatory synapse maturity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 1684–1689. ( 10.1073/pnas.1621367114) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Vaidyanathan K, et al. 2017. Identification and characterization of a missense mutation in the O-linked beta-N-acetylglucosamine (O-GlcNAc) transferase gene that segregates with X-linked intellectual disability. J. Biol. Chem. 292, 8948–8963. ( 10.1074/jbc.M116.771030) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Willems AP, et al. 2017. Mutations in N-acetylglucosamine (O-GlcNAc) transferase in patients with X-linked intellectual disability. J. Biol. Chem. 292, 12 621–12 631. ( 10.1074/jbc.M117.790097) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Selvan N, et al. 2018. O-GlcNAc transferase missense mutations linked to X-linked intellectual disability deregulate genes involved in cell fate determination and signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 293, 10 810–10 824. ( 10.1074/jbc.RA118.002583) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Pravata VM, et al. 2019. Catalytic deficiency of O-GlcNAc transferase leads to X-linked intellectual disability. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 14 961–14 970. ( 10.1073/pnas.1900065116) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Pravata VM, et al. 2019. A missense mutation in the catalytic domain of O-GlcNAc transferase links perturbations in protein O-GlcNAcylation to X-linked intellectual disability. FEBS Lett. ( 10.1002/1873-3468.13640) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zachara NE, O'Donnell N, Cheung WD, Mercer JJ, Marth JD, Hart GW. 2004. Dynamic O-GlcNAc modification of nucleocytoplasmic proteins in response to stress. A survival response of mammalian cells. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 30 133–30 142. ( 10.1074/jbc.M403773200) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Maynard JC, Burlingame AL, Medzihradszky KF. 2016. Cysteine S-linked N-acetylglucosamine (S-GlcNAcylation), a new post-translational modification in mammals. Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 15, 3405–3411. ( 10.1074/mcp.M116.061549) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hanover JA, Krause MW, Love DC. 2012. Bittersweet memories: linking metabolism to epigenetics through O-GlcNAcylation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 13, 312–321. ( 10.1038/nrm3334) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ruan HB, Singh JP, Li MD, Wu J, Yang X. 2013. Cracking the O-GlcNAc code in metabolism. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 24, 301–309. ( 10.1016/j.tem.2013.02.002) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Muller R, Jenny A, Stanley P. 2013. The EGF repeat-specific O-GlcNAc-transferase Eogt interacts with notch signaling and pyrimidine metabolism pathways in Drosophila. PLoS ONE 8, e62835 ( 10.1371/journal.pone.0062835) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Guinez C, Mir AM, Leroy Y, Cacan R, Michalski JC, Lefebvre T. 2007. Hsp70-GlcNAc-binding activity is released by stress, proteasome inhibition, and protein misfolding. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 361, 414–420. ( 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.07.020) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Trapannone R, Mariappa D, Ferenbach AT, van Aalten DM. 2016. Nucleocytoplasmic human O-GlcNAc transferase is sufficient for O-GlcNAcylation of mitochondrial proteins. Biochem. J. 473, 1693–1702. ( 10.1042/BCJ20160092) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Banerjee PS, Ma J, Hart GW. 2015. Diabetes-associated dysregulation of O-GlcNAcylation in rat cardiac mitochondria. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 6050–6055. ( 10.1073/pnas.1424017112) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ruan HB, Nie Y, Yang X. 2013. Regulation of protein degradation by O-GlcNAcylation: crosstalk with ubiquitination. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 12, 3489–3497. ( 10.1074/mcp.R113.029751) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Fukata Y, et al. 2002. CRMP-2 binds to tubulin heterodimers to promote microtubule assembly. Nat. Cell Biol. 4, 583–591. ( 10.1038/ncb825) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Alfaro JF, et al. 2012. Tandem mass spectrometry identifies many mouse brain O-GlcNAcylated proteins including EGF domain-specific O-GlcNAc transferase targets. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 7280–7285. ( 10.1073/pnas.1200425109) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Leney AC, El Atmioui D, Wu W, Ovaa H, Heck AJR. 2017. Elucidating crosstalk mechanisms between phosphorylation and O-GlcNAcylation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E7255–E7E61. ( 10.1073/pnas.1620529114) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Goshima Y, Nakamura F, Strittmatter P, Strittmatter SM. 1995. Collapsin-induced growth cone collapse mediated by an intracellular protein related to UNC-33. Nature 376, 509–514. ( 10.1038/376509a0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Smet-Nocca C, et al. 2011. Identification of O-GlcNAc sites within peptides of the Tau protein and their impact on phosphorylation. Mol. Biosyst. 7, 1420–1429. ( 10.1039/c0mb00337a) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Cole AR, et al. 2007. Collapsin response mediator protein-2 hyperphosphorylation is an early event in Alzheimer's disease progression. J. Neurochem. 103, 1132–1144. ( 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.04829.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Williamson R, et al. 2011. CRMP2 hyperphosphorylation is characteristic of Alzheimer's disease and not a feature common to other neurodegenerative diseases. J. Alzheimers Dis. 27, 615–625. ( 10.3233/JAD-2011-110617) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Shimada K, et al. 2014. Collapsin response mediator protein 2 is involved in regulating breast cancer progression. Breast Cancer 21, 715–723. ( 10.1007/s12282-013-0447-5) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Oliemuller E, et al. 2013. Phosphorylated tubulin adaptor protein CRMP-2 as prognostic marker and candidate therapeutic target for NSCLC. Int. J. Cancer 132, 1986–1995. ( 10.1002/ijc.27881) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Grant NJ, Coates PJ, Woods YL, Bray SE, Morrice NA, Hastie CJ, Lamont DJ, Carey FA, Sutherland C. 2015. Phosphorylation of a splice variant of collapsin response mediator protein 2 in the nucleus of tumour cells links cyclin dependent kinase-5 to oncogenesis. BMC Cancer 15, 885 ( 10.1186/s12885-015-1691-1) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Hart GW, et al. 1995. O-linked N-acetylglucosamine: the ‘yin-yang’ of Ser/Thr phosphorylation? Nuclear and cytoplasmic glycosylation. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 376, 115–123. ( 10.1007/978-1-4615-1885-3_10) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Chou TY, Hart GW, Dang CV. 1995. c-Myc is glycosylated at threonine 58, a known phosphorylation site and a mutational hot spot in lymphomas. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 18 961–18 965. ( 10.1074/jbc.270.32.18961) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Cheng X, Hart GW. 2001. Alternative O-glycosylation/O-phosphorylation of serine-16 in murine estrogen receptor beta: post-translational regulation of turnover and transactivation activity. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 10 570–10 575. ( 10.1074/jbc.M010411200) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Liu F, Iqbal K, Grundke-Iqbal I, Hart GW, Gong CX. 2004. O-GlcNAcylation regulates phosphorylation of tau: a mechanism involved in Alzheimer's disease. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 10 804–10 809. ( 10.1073/pnas.0400348101) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Ip JP, Fu AK, Ip NY. 2014. CRMP2: functional roles in neural development and therapeutic potential in neurological diseases. Neuroscientist 20, 589–598. ( 10.1177/1073858413514278) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Lykissas MG, Batistatou AK, Charalabopoulos KA, Beris AE. 2007. The role of neurotrophins in axonal growth, guidance, and regeneration. Curr. Neurovasc. Res. 4, 143–151. ( 10.2174/156720207780637216) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Kawano Y, Yoshimura T, Tsuboi D, Kawabata S, Kaneko-Kawano T, Shirataki H, Takenawa T, Kaibuchi K. 2005. CRMP-2 is involved in kinesin-1-dependent transport of the Sra-1/WAVE1 complex and axon formation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 9920–9935. ( 10.1128/MCB.25.22.9920-9935.2005) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Khanna R, Wilson SM, Brittain JM, Weimer J, Sultana R, Butterfield A, Hensley K. 2012. Opening Pandora's jar: a primer on the putative roles of CRMP2 in a panoply of neurodegenerative, sensory and motor neuron, and central disorders. Future Neurol. 7, 749–771. ( 10.2217/fnl.12.68) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Makihara H, et al. 2016. CRMP1 and CRMP2 have synergistic but distinct roles in dendritic development. Genes Cells 21, 994–1005. ( 10.1111/gtc.12399) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Nakamura H, et al. 2016. Comprehensive behavioral study and proteomic analyses of CRMP2-deficient mice. Genes Cells 21, 1059–1079. ( 10.1111/gtc.12403) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Zhang H, et al. 2016. Brain-specific Crmp2 deletion leads to neuronal development deficits and behavioural impairments in mice. Nat. Commun. 7, 11773 ( 10.1038/ncomms11773) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Uchida Y, et al. 2005. Semaphorin3A signalling is mediated via sequential Cdk5 and GSK3beta phosphorylation of CRMP2: implication of common phosphorylating mechanism underlying axon guidance and Alzheimer's disease. Genes Cells 10, 165–179. ( 10.1111/j.1365-2443.2005.00827.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Cole AR, et al. 2006. Distinct priming kinases contribute to differential regulation of collapsin response mediator proteins by glycogen synthase kinase-3 in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 16 591–16 598. ( 10.1074/jbc.M513344200) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Khidekel N, et al. 2007. Probing the dynamics of O-GlcNAc glycosylation in the brain using quantitative proteomics. Nat. Chem. Biol. 3, 339–348. ( 10.1038/nchembio881) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Cole RN, Hart GW. 2001. Cytosolic O-glycosylation is abundant in nerve terminals. J. Neurochem. 79, 1080–1089. ( 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2001.00655.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Trinidad JC, Barkan DT, Gulledge BF, Thalhammer A, Sali A, Schoepfer R, Burlingame AL. 2012. Global identification and characterization of both O-GlcNAcylation and phosphorylation at the murine synapse. Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 11, 215–229. ( 10.1074/mcp.O112.018366) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Mariappa D, Selvan N, Borodkin VS, Alonso J, Ferenbach AT, Shepherd C, Navratilova IH, Van Aalten DMF. 2015. A mutant O-GlcNAcase as a probe to reveal global dynamics of protein O-GlcNAcylation during Drosophila embryonic development. Biochem. J. 470, 255–262. ( 10.1042/BJ20150610) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Selvan N, et al. 2017. A mutant O-GlcNAcase enriches Drosophila developmental regulators. Nat. Chem. Biol. 13, 882–887. ( 10.1038/nchembio.2404) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Jochmann R, Holz P, Sticht H, Sturzl M. 2014. Validation of the reliability of computational O-GlcNAc prediction. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1844, 416–421. ( 10.1016/j.bbapap.2013.12.002) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Pathak S, Alonso J, Schimpl M, Rafie K, Blair DE, Borodkin VS, Schüttelkopf AW, Albarbarawi O, Van Aalten DM. 2015. The active site of O-GlcNAc transferase imposes constraints on substrate sequence. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 22, 744–750. ( 10.1038/nsmb.3063) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Liu Y, et al. 2012. Developmental regulation of protein O-GlcNAcylation, O-GlcNAc transferase, and O-GlcNAcase in mammalian brain. PLoS ONE 7, e43724 ( 10.1371/journal.pone.0043724) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Kearse KP, Hart GW. 1991. Lymphocyte activation induces rapid changes in nuclear and cytoplasmic glycoproteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 88, 1701–1705. ( 10.1073/pnas.88.5.1701) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Vosseller K, Wells L, Lane MD, Hart GW. 2002. Elevated nucleocytoplasmic glycosylation by O-GlcNAc results in insulin resistance associated with defects in Akt activation in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 5313–5318. ( 10.1073/pnas.072072399) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Slawson C, Zachara NE, Vosseller K, Cheung WD, Lane MD, Hart GW. 2005. Perturbations in O-linked beta-N-acetylglucosamine protein modification cause severe defects in mitotic progression and cytokinesis. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 32 944–32 956. ( 10.1074/jbc.M503396200) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Zhu Y, Liu TW, Cecioni S, Eskandari R, Zandberg WF, Vocadlo DJ. 2015. O-GlcNAc occurs cotranslationally to stabilize nascent polypeptide chains. Nat. Chem. Biol. 11, 319–325. ( 10.1038/nchembio.1774) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Dorfmueller HC, Borodkin VS, Schimpl M, van Aalten DM. 2009. GlcNAcstatins are nanomolar inhibitors of human O-GlcNAcase inducing cellular hyper-O-GlcNAcylation. Biochem. J. 420, 221–227. ( 10.1042/BJ20090110) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Dorfmueller HC, Borodkin VS, Schimpl M, Zheng X, Kime R, Read KD, Van Aalten DMF. 2010. Cell-penetrant, nanomolar O-GlcNAcase inhibitors selective against lysosomal hexosaminidases. Chem. Biol. 17, 1250–1255. ( 10.1016/j.chembiol.2010.09.014) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Enríquez JA. 2019. Mind your mouse strain. Nat. Metab. 1, 5–7. ( 10.1038/s42255-018-0018-3) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Byk T, Dobransky T, Cifuentes-Diaz C, Sobel A. 1996. Identification and molecular characterization of Unc-33-like phosphoprotein (Ulip), a putative mammalian homolog of the axonal guidance-associated unc-33 gene product. J. Neurosci. 16, 688–701. ( 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-02-00688.1996) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Wang LH, Strittmatter SM. 1996. A family of rat CRMP genes is differentially expressed in the nervous system. J. Neurosci. 16, 6197–6207. ( 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-19-06197.1996) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Vosseller K, et al. 2006. O-linked N-acetylglucosamine proteomics of postsynaptic density preparations using lectin weak affinity chromatography and mass spectrometry. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 5, 923–934. ( 10.1074/mcp.T500040-MCP200) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Pravata VM, Omelkova M, Stavridis MP, Desbiens CM, Stephen HM, Lefeber DJ et al. . In press. An intellectual disability syndrome with point variants in O-GlcNAc transferase. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Niisato E, Nagai J, Yamashita N, Nakamura F, Goshima Y, Ohshima T. 2013. Phosphorylation of CRMP2 is involved in proper bifurcation of the apical dendrite of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons. Dev. Neurobiol. 73, 142–151. ( 10.1002/dneu.22048) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Veyrac A, Reibel S, Sacquet J, Mutin M, Camdessanche JP, Kolattukudy P, Honnorat J, Jourdan F. 2011. CRMP5 regulates generation and survival of newborn neurons in olfactory and hippocampal neurogenic areas of the adult mouse brain. PLoS ONE 6, e23721 ( 10.1371/journal.pone.0023721) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Liu ZZ, Zhu J, Wang CL, Wang X, Han YY, Liu LY, Xu HA. et al. 2018. CRMP2 and CRMP4 are differentially required for axon guidance and growth in zebrafish retinal neurons. Neural Plast. 2018, 8791304 ( 10.1155/2018/8791304) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Yamashita N, Ohshima T, Nakamura F, Kolattukudy P, Honnorat J, Mikoshiba K, Goshima Y. 2012. Phosphorylation of CRMP2 (collapsin response mediator protein 2) is involved in proper dendritic field organization. J. Neurosci. 32, 1360–1365. ( 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5563-11.2012) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Nakamura H, et al. 2018. Proteome and behavioral alterations in phosphorylation-deficient mutant Collapsin Response Mediator Protein2 knock-in mice. Neurochem. Int. 119, 207–217. ( 10.1016/j.neuint.2018.04.009) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Vogel-Ciernia A, Wood MA. 2014. Examining object location and object recognition memory in mice. Curr. Protoc. Neurosci. 69, 8.31.1–8.31.17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Yoshida H, Watanabe A, Ihara Y. 1998. Collapsin response mediator protein-2 is associated with neurofibrillary tangles in Alzheimer's disease. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 9761–9768. ( 10.1074/jbc.273.16.9761) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Freeman HC, Hugill A, Dear NT, Ashcroft FM, Cox RD. 2006. Deletion of nicotinamide nucleotide transhydrogenase: a new quantitive trait locus accounting for glucose intolerance in C57BL/6 J mice. Diabetes 55, 2153–2156. ( 10.2337/db06-0358) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Nicholson A, Reifsnyder PC, Malcolm RD, Lucas CA, MacGregor GR, Zhang W, Leiter EH. 2010. Diet-induced obesity in two C57BL/6 substrains with intact or mutant nicotinamide nucleotide transhydrogenase (Nnt) gene. Obesity (Silver Spring) 18, 1902–1905. ( 10.1038/oby.2009.477) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Picard M, McManus MJ, Gray JD, Nasca C, Moffat C, Kopinski PK, Seifert EL, McEwen BS, Wallace DC. 2015. Mitochondrial functions modulate neuroendocrine, metabolic, inflammatory, and transcriptional responses to acute psychological stress. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E6614–E6623. ( 10.1073/pnas.1515733112) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Fan W, et al. 2008. A mouse model of mitochondrial disease reveals germline selection against severe mtDNA mutations. Science 319, 958–962. ( 10.1126/science.1147786) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Niwa S, et al. 2017. Structural basis for CRMP2-induced axonal microtubule formation. Sci. Rep. 7, 10 681 ( 10.1038/s41598-017-11031-4) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Myllykoski M, Baumann A, Hensley K, Kursula P. 2017. Collapsin response mediator protein 2: high-resolution crystal structure sheds light on small-molecule binding, post-translational modifications, and conformational flexibility. Amino Acids 49, 747–759. ( 10.1007/s00726-016-2376-z) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Wang LH, Strittmatter SM. 1997. Brain CRMP forms heterotetramers similar to liver dihydropyrimidinase. J. Neurochem. 69, 2261–2269. ( 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1997.69062261.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Alonso J, Santaren JF. 2005. Proteomic analysis of the wing imaginal discs of Drosophila melanogaster. Proteomics 5, 474–489. ( 10.1002/pmic.200400923) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Post H, Penning R, Fitzpatrick MA, Garrigues LB, Wu W, MacGillavry HD, Hoogenraad CC, Heck AJ, Altelaar AM. 2017. Robust, sensitive, and automated phosphopeptide enrichment optimized for low sample amounts applied to primary hippocampal neurons. J. Proteome Res. 16, 728–737. ( 10.1021/acs.jproteome.6b00753) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Pathak S, Borodkin VS, Albarbarawi O, Campbell DG, Ibrahim A, van Aalten DM. 2012. O-GlcNAcylation of TAB1 modulates TAK1-mediated cytokine release. EMBO J. 31, 1394–1404. ( 10.1038/emboj.2012.8) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Gorelik A, Bartual SG, Borodkin VS, Varghese J, Ferenbach AT, van Aalten DMF. 2019. Genetic recoding to dissect the roles of site-specific protein O-GlcNAcylation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 26, 1071–1077. ( 10.1038/s41594-019-0325-8) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Rao FV, Dorfmueller HC, Villa F, Allwood M, Eggleston IM, van Aalten DM. 2006. Structural insights into the mechanism and inhibition of eukaryotic O-GlcNAc hydrolysis. EMBO J. 25, 1569–1578. ( 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601026) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Tai HC, Serrano-Pozo A, Hashimoto T, Frosch MP, Spires-Jones TL, Hyman BT. 2012. The synaptic accumulation of hyperphosphorylated tau oligomers in Alzheimer disease is associated with dysfunction of the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Am. J. Pathol. 181, 1426–1435. ( 10.1016/j.ajpath.2012.06.033) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Ennaceur A, Delacour J. 1988. A new one-trial test for neurobiological studies of memory in rats. 1: Behavioral data. Behav. Brain Res. 31, 47–59. ( 10.1016/0166-4328(88)90157-X) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
This article has no additional data.