Skip to main content
Royal Society Open Science logoLink to Royal Society Open Science
. 2019 Nov 20;6(11):191501. doi: 10.1098/rsos.191501

Fauna of the Kemp Caldera and its upper bathyal hydrothermal vents (South Sandwich Arc, Antarctica)

Katrin Linse 1,†,, Jonathan T Copley 2, Douglas P Connelly 3, Robert D Larter 1, David A Pearce 1,, Nick V C Polunin 4, Alex D Rogers 5,, Chong Chen 6, Andrew Clarke 1, Adrian G Glover 7, Alastair G C Graham 1,||, Veerle A I Huvenne 3, Leigh Marsh 2, William D K Reid 4, C Nicolai Roterman 5, Christopher J Sweeting 4, Katrin Zwirglmaier 1,§, Paul A Tyler 2
PMCID: PMC6894572  PMID: 31827872

Abstract

Faunal assemblages at hydrothermal vents associated with island-arc volcanism are less well known than those at vents on mid-ocean ridges and back-arc spreading centres. This study characterizes chemosynthetic biotopes at active hydrothermal vents discovered at the Kemp Caldera in the South Sandwich Arc. The caldera hosts sulfur and anhydrite vent chimneys in 1375–1487 m depth, which emit sulfide-rich fluids with temperatures up to 212°C, and the microbial community of water samples in the buoyant plume rising from the vents was dominated by sulfur-oxidizing Gammaproteobacteria. A total of 12 macro- and megafaunal taxa depending on hydrothermal activity were collected in these biotopes, of which seven species were known from the East Scotia Ridge (ESR) vents and three species from vents outside the Southern Ocean. Faunal assemblages were dominated by large vesicomyid clams, actinostolid anemones, Sericosura sea spiders and lepetodrilid and cocculinid limpets, but several taxa abundant at nearby ESR hydrothermal vents were rare such as the stalked barnacle Neolepas scotiaensis. Multivariate analysis of fauna at Kemp Caldera and vents in neighbouring areas indicated that the Kemp Caldera is most similar to vent fields in the previously established Southern Ocean vent biogeographic province, showing that the species composition at island-arc hydrothermal vents can be distinct from nearby seafloor-spreading systems. δ13C and δ15N isotope values of megafaunal species analysed from the Kemp Caldera were similar to those of the same or related species at other vent fields, but none of the fauna sampled at Kemp Caldera had δ13C values, indicating nutritional dependence on Epsilonproteobacteria, unlike fauna at other island-arc hydrothermal vents.

Keywords: hydrothermal vents, chemosynthetic ecosystem, resurgent cone, stable isotopes, Gammaproteobacteria, biogeography

1. Introduction

The presence of active volcanoes on the Antarctic continent and several islands in the Southern Ocean was recorded by early polar explorers, such as Sir James Clark Ross who observed an eruption of Mount Erebus in 1841 [1]. These clearly visible volcanoes have been the subject of geological and biological research for a long time (e.g. [2,3]). The presence of volcanic and measurable tectonic activity, such as eruptions, steam fields, fumaroles and earthquakes on the Antarctic Peninsula, Marie Byrd Land, Victoria Land, the islands of the South Shetlands and South Sandwich Arc and their surrounding seas (e.g. [2,4]), has implied the presence of sub-ice and submarine volcanism and hydrothermal activity [58].

In the Antarctic and Southern Ocean marine environment, shallow-water hydrothermal fumaroles occur in the caldera of Deception Island and are characterized by depleted marine life with low species richness and faunal abundance compared to other Antarctic shallows (e.g. [911]). Hot vents and cold seeps have been discovered in the Bransfield Strait in 990–1500 m depth [1217], in the Larsen B ice shelf area, eastern Antarctic Peninsula, in 215–850 m water depth [1820], and on the shelf of South Georgia in 250–350 m water depth [21,22], but the fauna associated with these locations mostly comprise elements of typical Antarctic and Southern Ocean shelf fauna, with two exceptions associated with chemosynthetic environments including the siboglinid polychaete Sclerolinum contortum at Hook Ridge, Bransfield Strait [23] and a large vesicomyid clam at Larsen B [22,2426].

Hydrothermal vent fields with abundant novel fauna have been discovered on the back-arc spreading centre of the East Scotia Ridge (ESR) in 2400–2600 m depth, and on the Australian Antarctic Ridge (AAR) in 1800–1900 m depth [27,28]. High-temperature ‘black-smoker’ venting occurs at two vent fields, on ESR segments E2 and E9 [27,29,30], which are inhabited by vent-specific species including the yeti crab Kiwa tyleri, the gastropods Gigantopelta chessoia and Lepetodrilus concentricus, the stalked barnacle Neolepas scotiaensis, the seven-armed sea star Paulasterias tyleri and undescribed actinostolid anemones [3136], in assemblages supported by chemoautotrophic carbon fixation [3740]. To date, the AAR sites have not been visited and imaged by remotely operated vehicles (ROVs), but specimens of associated vent fauna Kiwa araonae and Paulasterias tyleri have been collected, indicating the presence of faunal assemblages supported by chemosynthesis [28,41].

Situated on the Sandwich Plate, the South Sandwich Arc of the Southern Ocean comprises actively erupting volcanic South Sandwich Islands and their associated seamounts [42,43]. The minor tectonic Sandwich Plate is separated in the west from the Scotia Plate by the ESR, a back-arc spreading centre formed by the subduction of South American Plate on the eastern margin of the microplate, which also forms the South Sandwich Trench [42,44,45]. To the south, the Sandwich Plate is bordered by the Antarctic Plate [42]. The active volcanic arc ranges from northern Protector Shoal seamounts via eleven volcanic islands to seamounts in the south, one of the southernmost being the Kemp Seamount [42]. Submarine hydrothermal vents have been reported from this island arc at Adventure Crater [46], Protector Shoal seamounts and Quest Caldera [47], and Kemp Caldera near the Kemp Seamount [29,48], which is the focus of this study. The Kemp Caldera is situated within a restricted zone of the South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands Marine Protected Area (SGSSI MPA), where both research and fisheries activities are regulated by the SGSSI government [49]. In the SGSSI MPA, commercial benthic bottom trawling is banned and longline fisheries are restricted to depths between 700 and 2250 m (www.gov.gs). The SGSSI government is in the process of enacting legislation to protect the environment of the SGSSI MPA from any future mining or hydrocarbon activity (exploration and exploitation) to align with the Madrid Protocol of the Antarctic Treaty, and elucidating the faunal assemblages associated with hydrothermal vents in the SGSSI MPA informs that legislative effort.

The ecology of deep-sea hydrothermal vents associated with island-arc volcanism is less well known compared to vents on mid-ocean ridges and back-arc spreading centres, despite island-arcs extending over a total distance of 22 000 km in the oceans [50,51]. Island-arc hydrothermal vents in the Pacific and Caribbean exhibit contrasting vent fluid geochemistry to hydrothermal systems on seafloor spreading centres. Hydrothermal vents in the Mariana arc produce fluids with low pH, high CO2 and low H2S concentrations compared to ‘black smoker’ vents on mid-ocean ridges [51]. At vents on the Loihi Seamount of the Hawaiian archipelago, low concentrations of H2S favour microbial communities dominated by Fe-oxidizing bacteria rather than sulfide-oxidizers [52]. Hydrothermal vents on the Nafanua cone in the crater of Vailulu'u Seamount in the Samoan archipelago produce fluids with pH 2.7 and droplets of liquid CO2; dead midwater metazoans are abundant on the seafloor around those vents, where an acid-tolerant polynoid polychaete feeds on bacteria colonizing animal carcasses [53]. A similar ‘dead zone’ of midwater shrimp has been observed around hydrothermal vents in the summit crater of Kick'em Jenny submarine volcano in the Lesser Antilles arc of the Caribbean [54], which also hosts a cold-seep ecosystem on a debris avalanche deposit on its western flank [55].

Environmental differences between island-arc hydrothermal systems and those on seafloor spreading centres may result in differences in their associated faunal assemblages, but few faunal assemblages have been characterized from island-arc vent systems, and none have been previously described from the Southern Ocean. Although some species found at ESR vents have also been reported from the Kemp Caldera, such as the limpet Lepetodrilus concentricus, the stalked barnacle N. scotiaensis, the sea star P. tyleri and the sea spiders Sericosura spp. [3335,56], the faunal assemblage associated with this island-arc hydrothermal system has not yet been described in detail. The aims of this study are, therefore, to define the different biotopes in the hydrothermally active areas of the caldera, characterize the trophic ecology of the faunal assemblage and determine the levels of similarity between the fauna of this island-arc vent system and assemblages at hydrothermal vents on seafloor spreading centres in neighbouring regions.

We hypothesize that the chemosynthetic fauna present in the venting sites of the Kemp Caldera will be similar to that of the ESR segments E2 and E9, based on their relatively close distance of only approximately 440 km and approximately 90 km away, respectively.

2. Material and methods

Data for this study were collected during two expeditions at sea: expedition JR224 on board the Royal Research Ship (RRS) James Clark Ross in February 2009 [57] and expedition JC42 on board the RRS James Cook in January 2010 [58].

2.1. Hydro-acoustic data

Multibeam swathe bathymetry surveys of the caldera were conducted by the RRS James Clark Ross's hull-mounted Kongsberg SIMRAD EM120 multibeam echo sounder during expedition JR224 and by the SIMRAD SM2000 high-resolution (200 kHz) multibeam echosounder mounted on ROV Isis during expedition JC42 [27,58,59]. ROV-mounted swathe data were processed using the IFREMER software package CARAIBES [59].

2.2. Water column and hydrothermal fluid sampling

On JC42, water column samples were collected using a titanium frame with 24 externally sprung Niskin bottles, specifically designed for sampling waters with low levels of trace metals and nutrients. The frame also included a Seabird + 911 CTD, a light scattering sensor (LSS) and a reductive potential (Eh) detector. The 10 l Niskin bottles were Teflon lined, with Teflon taps and non-metallic parts, any metallic components were constructed using titanium or high-quality stainless steel. Water samples were analysed for particulate, dissolved and soluble concentrations of metals and oxyanions [29] as well as microbial diversity (detailed below).

Hydrothermal fluid sampling was achieved using titanium (Ti) samplers on the ROV, equipped with an inductively coupled link (ICL) high-temperature sensor to ensure the collection of high-quality samples. In the case of diffuse flow fluid sampling or sampling of friable chimney structures, the Ti samplers were used in conjunction with a specially constructed Ti diffuse sampler, which was used to prevent entrainment of surrounding seawater into the path of the fluid during sampling [27].

2.3. Seabed imagery

During expedition JR224, the towed seabed high-resolution imaging platform (SHRIMP) was deployed once in the caldera near the Kemp Seamount to collect video imagery of the seabed that enabled identification of megafaunal (greater than 3 cm) benthic invertebrates [57]. SHRIMP was equipped with three video-only recording cameras, a forward-looking Simrad PAL colour charge-coupled device (CCD) camera type OE1364, a downward-looking Bowtech PAL colour CCD camera type L3C-550 and a downward-looking three-chip Panasonic camcorder.

In 2010, during expedition JC42 the ROV Isis was deployed for 8 dives with a total of 118 h deployment time at the Kemp Caldera (figure 1; electronic supplementary material, table 1). For seafloor imagery (photos, video and frame grabs of videos) ROV Isis was equipped with a three-chip CCD video camera (Insite Pacific Atlas), a 1080i high-definition video camera (Insite Pacific Mini Zeus) on a pan-and-tilt-mount and a 3.3-megapixel stills camera (Insite Scorpio) [59]. Additionally, two lasers, 0.1 m apart, were mounted parallel to the focal axis of the video camera to provide scale in images. Footage from the video cameras was recorded on DVCAM tapes and DVD and from the still camera on a memory card [27].

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Map of the Southern Ocean; (a) location of Kemp Caldera in the Southern Ocean; (b) bathymetric profile, west to east through the Kemp Caldera; (c) bathymetric profile, south to north through the Kemp Caldera; (d) map of Kemp Seamount and the Kemp Caldera showing the resurgent cone; (e) sampling sites in the vicinity of the resurgent cone in the Kemp Caldera.

2.4. Macro- and megafauna sample treatment

Benthic invertebrates were collected by either the ROV Isis’s suction sampler or scoop and brought to the surface in ambient seawater. Once on board, samples were immediately transferred to seawater in a temperature-controlled laboratory set to +4°C where individuals were dissected and either frozen or stored in molecular grade ethanol for molecular analysis, frozen for isotope analysis or fixed in 10% seawater formalin for morphological analysis.

2.4.1. Stable isotopes

For stable isotope analysis of the food web structure in and outside the venting areas in the Kemp Caldera, different tissues were used for different species: tube feet in the asteroids, tentacles in the sea anemones and foot muscle tissue in the vesicomyid clam. Pycnogonids were sampled whole while the cocculinid gastropods were removed from their shells and sampled whole. Faunal tissue samples were freeze-dried and ground to homogeneous powder using a pestle and mortar. Aliquots of fauna were tested for carbonates prior to analysis. The samples did not effervesce and therefore no acidification was carried out. Dual δ13C and δ15N were measured by elemental analysis-isotope ratio mass spectrometry (EA-IRMS) using a Roboprep-CN sample preparation module coupled to a Europa Scientific 20–20 IRMS on 1.0 mg of sample. δ34S was measured using a SERCON elemental analyser coupled to a Europa Scientific 20–20 IRMS on 2 mg of sample with an additional 4 mg of vanadium pentoxide as a catalyst. All analyses were carried out by Iso-Analytical (Crewe, UK). Stable isotope ratios were expressed in delta (δ) notation as parts per thousand (‰). An external reference material of freeze-dried and ground deep-sea fish white muscle (Antimora rostrata) was also analysed (δ13C, n = 28, −18.82‰ ± 0.10 s.d.; δ15N, n = 28, 13.11‰ ± 0.38 s.d.; δ34S, n = 7, 18.56‰ ± 0.44 s.d.).

2.5. Multivariate analysis of faunal similarity with vent fields in neighbouring regions

The species inventory for the site was compared with species lists compiled from published literature for 15 well-studied vent fields in neighbouring regions: the ESR (E2 and E9 vent fields), the Indian Ocean (Longqi, Duanqiao, Tiancheng on the Southwest Indian Ridge; Kairei, Edmond and Solitaire fields on the Central Indian Ridge) and Mid-Atlantic Ridge (Lucky Strike, Rainbow, Broken Spur, TAG, Snake Pit, Ashadze-1 and Logatchev fields), updating the dataset previously published by Copley et al. [60] with subsequently published records of additional sites and taxa [6164].

Meiofauna were not sampled at the Kemp Caldera during this study, and meiofaunal taxa were, therefore, excluded from species lists of other vent fields for comparison, following the protocol of Copley et al. [60], as their true absence cannot be inferred reliably from the literature for each vent field. ‘Non-vent’ taxa (defined as species originally described from non-chemosynthetic environments) were also excluded for the same reason, as such ‘normal’ deep-sea taxa on the periphery of vent fields are not consistently included in published species inventories of vent fields. The omission of these variably recorded groups, therefore, ensures equivalent datasets from each vent field for comparative analysis by only considering the presence/absence of macro- and megafaunal taxa considered to be endemic to chemosynthetic environments.

The identities of taxa were recorded to species level in the dataset where possible, and indeterminate species of the same genus at different sites were conservatively assigned to separate taxonomic units to avoid potential false conflation of faunal similarity. In total, the resulting database of vent fauna (presented in the electronic supplementary material) contains 329 records of 159 taxa across 16 vent fields. A similarity matrix between vent fields was calculated from taxon presence/absence records using Sørensen's Index. Hierarchical agglomerative clustering using group-average linkage, and non-metric multidimensional scaling (MDS) with a 5% proportion of the metric MDS solution to reduce sample-point collapse, were applied to the similarity matrix using PRIMER v. 7 to produce a dendrogram and two-dimensional ordination representing similarity relationships.

2.6. Microbiological sample treatment

For the analysis of the microbial biodiversity in the water column, 30 l of water from one sample within the buoyant vent plume, at a depth of 1355 m (about 60 m above the seafloor) taken with CTD Niskin bottles were filtered through a 0.2 µm pore size nitrocellulose filter (Whatman GE Healthcare). The water at the sampling depth showed a strong decrease in the redox potential of 342 mV with concomitant increase in LSS of 0.538 compared to surface water. The filters were frozen at −80°C until further analysis. DNA was extracted from the filters using a phenol/chloroform protocol [42]. To test for the presence of endosymbiont in the vesicomyid clams, gill tissue was frozen at −80°C. DNA from gill tissue was extracted with phenol/chloroform as above, but using a longer Proteinase K digest (1 h at 37°C followed by 1 h at 50°C).

The near full-length 16S rRNA gene was amplified by PCR using the universal bacterial primers 27F [65] and 1492R [66] and universal archaeal primers ARCH46F [67] and UA1406R [68]. PCR conditions were 3 min at 94°C, followed by 30 cycles of 60 s at 94°C, 45 s at 50°C, 90 s at 72°C and a final elongation of 5 min at 72°C. PCR products were cloned into the pCR2.1 vector by TOPO TA cloning (Invitrogen-Life Technologies, USA), following the manufacturer's recommendations and plated on LB-Ampicillin plates containing X-gal for blue-white screening. White clones were checked for correct insert size by PCR using the plasmid primers M13F and M13R. A total of 134 clones from the filters and 131 clones from the clams' gill tissues were sequenced bi-directionally by Sanger sequencing at LGC Genomics (Berlin, Germany). The sequences were trimmed, QC checked and overlapping ends assembled with the software package Geneious (www.geneious.com) to obtain the near full-length 16S rRNA sequence and subsequently aligned to a reference database (SILVA 102 www.arb-silva.de) and phylogenetically identified within arb [69]. Sequences have been submitted to GenBank (accession numbers MK736312–MK736351).

For flow cytometry, 1.5 ml of five water samples taken with CTD Niskin bottles at different points within the vent plume of each water sample was fixed in 0.5% (v/v) glutaraldehyde and frozen at −80°C until analysis. Samples were stained in 0.001% (v/v) SYBR green I (Sigma) for 1 h before measurement in a FACScan flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, Oxford, UK). Flow cytometry data were analysed with CytoWin [70].

3. Results

3.1. Study area

In 2009, multibeam bathymetry surveys in the vicinity of the Vysokaya Bank, southern South Sandwich Island volcanic arc, revealed a caldera to the west of the Kemp Seamount (59°42' S, 28°20’ W) (figure 1). This previously unseen feature measures an E–W rim-to-rim width of 8300 m, a N–S width of 6500 m and a flat bottom floor width of approximately 2500 m. The sill depth is at 900 m while the inner floor depth is approximately 1600 m resulting in a difference of approximately 700 m from rim to floor. These dimensions indicated that the depression is a caldera (i.e. formed by collapse of the sea floor into a drained magma chamber; [71]), rather than a crater (formed as a direct result of an eruption), as the latter rarely exceed 2 km in diameter and typically have lower width/depth ratios [72,73]. The structure is referred to as ‘Kemp Caldera’ hereafter.

The ‘fresh’ morphology of the structure and its lack of sedimentary infill, demonstrated by seafloor observations of exposed rock surfaces and by the presence of blocky lavas at the caldera floor, suggest a particularly young age for the caldera. Further observations within and away from the caldera included the presence of slide blocks and mass movement structures (e.g. debris flow chutes) on the flanks of the caldera and seamount, which testified to the instability of slopes both here and elsewhere along the South Sandwich arc [45,74]. The rim of the caldera was marked by a heterogeneous topography featuring multiple cones and craters, indicating post-collapse activities, which commonly occurs around caldera rims.

The topography of the inner caldera floor was virtually flat apart from the presence of a mounded feature at the centre of the caldera, interpreted here as a resurgent cone. The cone had a neighbouring bank on the western side (figure 1b,c). The resurgent cone rose approximately 250 m from the caldera floor and is approximately 1000 m in diameter. On the SE base of the resurgent cone and on the NE flank of the bank in 1375–1487 m depth, hydrothermally active areas including venting chimneys and diffuse flow sites were discovered.

The deep-water oceanography around the Vysokaya Bank, including the Kemp Caldera, is characterized by the Weddell-Scotia Confluence [75] and two main water masses, the Circumpolar Deep Water (CDW) and the Weddell Sea Deep Water (WSDW) [76,77]. The CDW is driven by the Antarctic Circumpolar Current into the eastern Scotia Sea, while WSDW in the area originates either from it overflowing the South Scotia Ridge east of the Orkney Passage or entering through the Georgia Passage [76]. The waters within the Kemp Caldera show the characteristics of modified CDW.

3.2. Hydrothermal vent biotopes and their fauna

Fauna inside the Kemp Caldera was studied by analysing underwater imagery and samples collected from specific faunal assemblages, and their habitats are described as follows. The focus was on the benthic fauna of the identified hydrothermally actives areas, characterized by the presence of ‘white smoking’ venting, diffuse flow, precipitates and/or bacterial mats, while an overview is given on the observed benthic and pelagic fauna from surrounding non-venting environments. The video analyses defined eight assemblage types, classified as biotopes, under the influence of hydrothermal activities based either on the dominating macro- and megafauna or on the type of substrate (figures 2 and 3, tables 1 and 2). A further chemosynthetic biotope discovered in the Kemp Caldera adjacent to the resurgent cone, the decomposing skeleton of an Antarctic minke whale, has been described by Amon et al. [78].

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

In situ Kemp Caldera biotopes; (a) ferrous sediments, 59°41.86 S, 28°21.53 W; (b) non-vent soft sediment with ophiuroids and holothuroids, 59°41.83 S, 28°21.52 W; (c) non-vent basalt with alcyonaceans and brisingid, 59°41.82 S, 28°21.51 W; (d) vent halo zone with halichondriids, 59°41.64 S, 28°21.13 W; (e) basalt in diffuse flow with actinostolid anemones, pycnogonid Sericosura and cocculinid limpet, 59°41.67 S, 28°21.10 W; (f) basalt next to ‘Great Wall’ with actinostolids, Sericosura, cocculinids and vesicomyid clams Archivesica s.l. puertodeseadoi, 59°41.69 S, 28°21.10 W; (g) ‘Fine Sediment in Diffuse Flow’ with Archivesica s.l. puertodeseadoi, Sericosura, and cocculinids, 59°41.66 S, 28°20.99 W; (h) ‘Clam Road’ with Archivesica s.l. puertodeseadoi and cocculinids, 59°42.03 S, 28°21.23 W; (i) ‘Coarse Sediment in Diffuse Flow’ with cocculinids, Sericosura and actonostilids, 59°42.05 S, 28°21.22 W; (j) ‘Great Wall’, sulfur structure with white bacterial mats, 59°41.68 S, 28°21.09 W; (k) ‘Precipitated Sediment’ with cocculinids and Lepetodrilus concentricus, 59°41.67 S, 28°21.14 W; (l) ‘Winter Palace’, chimneys covered in anhydrite and with Lepetodrilus concentricus, 59°41.69 S, 28°20.97 W. The white bar is approximately 10 cm.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

In situ Kemp Caldera chemosynthetic fauna; (a) actinostolid sp. and cocculinid limpet at ‘Clam Road’, 59°42.05 S, 28°21.23 W; (b) Sericosura bamberi (yellow arrow), cocculinid limpet, Lepetodrilus concentricus at ‘Basalt next to Great Wall’, 59°41.67 S, 28°21.09 W; (c) cocculinid limpet and Sericosura bamberi (yellow arrow) at ‘Coarse Sediment in Diffuse Flow’, 59°42.06 S, 28°21.24 W; (d) Neolepas scotiaensis (yellow arrow) at ‘Basalt in Diffuse Flow’, 59°42.66 S, 28°20.98 W; (e) burrowed, live Archivesica s.l. puertodeseadoi with siphons visible (yellow arrow) at ‘Fine Sediment in Diffuse Flow’, 59°41.67 S, 28°21.01 W; (f) epilithically living Archivesica s.l. puertodeseadoi with siphons visible (yellow arrow) at ‘Clam Road’, 59°42.02 S, 28°21.23 W; (g) Paulasterias tyleri at ‘Fine Sediment in Diffuse Flow’, 59°41.71 S, 28°21.07 W; (h) Sclerolinum sp. at ‘Precipitated Sediment’, 59°41.68 S, 28°20.99 W.

Table 1.

Species presence in biotopes of the Kemp Caldera. Abundance: 0, absent; 1, rare; 2, occasional; 3, frequent; 4, common; x, present. *, records only from hydrothermal sites. WP, Winter Palace; GW, Great Wall; PS, Precipitated Sediment; BGW, Basalt next to Great Wall; BDF, Basalt in Diffuse Flow; CR, Clam Road; CSDF, Coarse Sediment in Diffuse Flow; FSDF, Fine Sediment in Diffuse Flow; BWM, Basalt covered in white mat.

species WP GW PS BGW BDF CR CSDF FSDF BWM
Porifera
Halichondriidae sp.* 2 2 2 4
Cnidaria
Actinostolidae sp.* 1 2 3 3 1 1
Anthomastus sp. 1
Mollusca
Gastropoda Lepetodrilus concentricus* 3 3 4 4 4 2
Cocculinidae sp.* 2 4 4 4 4 1
Bivalvia Archivesica s.l. puertodeseadoi* 3 1 3 2
Spinaxinus caldarium* 1 1
Parathyasira cf. dearborni 1
Cephalopoda Octopoda sp. 1
dead Decapodiformes x
Annelida
Sabellidae sp. 1
Sclerolinum contortum* 2
Nicomache lokii* 3 1 2
Polynoidae spp. 1
Terebellidae spp. 2 1
Spionidae spp. 2 1
Maldanidae spp. 1
Amphiomidae spp. 1
Chaetopteridae spp. 1 1
Crustacea
Cirripedia Neolepas scotiaensis* 1 1
Decapoda Nematocarcinus lanceopes 2
dead Nematocarcinus x
Chelicerata
Pycnogonida Sericosura bamberi* 2 3 4 4 1
Sericosura curva* 1
Sericosura dimorpha* 1
Nymphon cf. longicoxa 1
Echinodermata
Ophiuroidea indet 2
Asteroidea Paulasterias tyleri* 1 1 1
Echinoidea Sterechinus dentifer 1
Holothuridea Psolus sp. 1
Chordata
dead Notolepis annulata x

Table 2.

Mean δ13C, δ15N and δ34S (‰) of hydrothermal vent fauna and non-vent fauna collected from the Kemp Caldera. Standard deviations are in parentheses.

taxon tissue biotope N δ13C δ15N N δ34S
Halichondriidae sp. whole BWM 9 −40.93 (0.28) 5.68 (0.58) 3 3.53 (0.25)
Actinostolidae sp. tentacle BDF 35 −24.59 (0.62) 8.54 (0.52) 13 15.05 (1.51)
Cocculinidae sp. whole BGW 14 −26.80 (2.05) 3.46 (0.64) 12 3.94 (0.73)
Cocculinidae sp. whole CSDF 11 −23.81 (1.59) 6.06 (1.17) 8 7.16 (0.61)
Archivesica s.l. puertodeseadoi foot FSDF 38 −35.61 (0.36) −6.47 (1.73) 9 4.97 (2.856)
Archivesica s.l. puertodeseadoi foot CR 28 −35.20 (0.38) −3.24 (1.61) 10 8.79 (0.85)
Maldanidae sp. whole CR 1 −26.98 3.55 0
Terebellidae sp. whole CR 1 −27.45 2.81 0
Sericosura bamberi whole BGW 8 −24.18 (0.76) 8.59 (0.62) 8 8.15 (1.93)
Sericosura bamberi whole CSDF 16 −21.89 (2.25) 8.64 (0.68) 15 8.75 (2.29)
Anthomastus sp. polyps non-vent 4 −22.45 (1.35) 9.30 (0.29) 1 18.93
Echinoid sp. gonad non-vent 3 −26.96 (0.81) 8.97 (0.81) 0
Freyella sp. tube feet non-vent 3 −23.48 (1.41) 9.99 (0.90) 3 18.34 (0.29)
Bathyplotes sp. muscle non-vent 2 −22.73 (0.24) 7.25 (0.08) 1 18.13
Holothuroidea sp. 1 muscle non-vent 3 −22.44 (0.10) 8.08 (0.67) 3 17.46 (0.45)
Hymenaster sp. tube feet non-vent 3 −22.27 (0.58) 10.92 (0.48) 0
Odontaster penicillatus arm non-vent 1 −23.33 14.99 0
Ophiolimna antarctica arm non-vent 3 −22.29 (0.27) 9.88 (0.26) 0
Psolus sp. muscle non-vent 2 −22.60 (0.99) 9.07 (0.26) 0
Polynoidae sp. whole non-vent 1 −23.70 11.02 0
Nematocarcinus lanceopes muscle non-vent 4 −24.01 (0.47) 7.33 (0.26) 0
Macrouridae sp. muscle non-vent 1 −24.60 10.93 1 16.03
Notolepis annulata muscle non-vent 3 −26.00 (0.65) 7.53 (0.14) 2 17.02 (1.08)
Notolepis annulata­ (dead) muscle BDF 1 −26.09 8.33 1 17.13

3.2.1. Descriptions of the Kemp Biotopes

3.2.1.1. Great Wall (GW)

‘Great Wall’ (figure 2j) was defined by sulfurous structures, which include pure bright yellow crystalline sulfur, emerging from the seafloor, which hosted no macrofauna. The maximum temperature measured at ‘GW’ was 21°C. The macrofauna seen in close proximity to the biotope ‘GW’ belonged to assemblages associated with basalt rocks and boulders.

3.2.1.2. Winter Palace (WP)

This biotope was characterized by an area of dense ‘white smoking’ sulfide chimneys covered in bacterial mats (figure 2l) and emitting fluids with temperatures ranging from 103 to 212°C [48]. Pelagic animals, including squid or shrimp, swimming through the white smoke were observed to change colour from red to white and then drop to the seafloor. The only macro- or megafaunal species collected from chimney samples and observed living on the chimney surfaces was the vent limpet Lepetodrilus concentricus (figure 3b). The shell of limpets collected from these chimneys were covered in anhydrite and the limpets left what appeared to be ‘home scars’ around their sitting positions on the chimneys.

3.2.1.3. Basalt next to Great Wall (BGW)

Basalt outcrops, including rocks and boulders, and the soft sediment between them (figure 2f), next to the ‘GW’ structure, were characterized by the rare presence of large, infaunal specimens of the vesicomyid clam Archivesica s.l. puertodeseadoi (figure 3e), occasional large, dark red actinostolid anemones (figure 3a) and Sericosura spp. sea spiders (figure 3b,c) together with numerous individuals of L. concentricus and a cocculinid limpet (figure 3c). A single specimen of the stalked barnacle Neolepas scotiaensis (figure 3d) was seen in this biotope.

3.2.1.4. Basalt in Diffuse Flow (BDF)

Rigid and continuous basalts on the slope of the resurgent cone were associated with diffuse hydrothermal flow and hosted an assemblage of abundant macrofauna (figure 2e). The cocculinid limpet and Lepetodrilus conentricus both occurred at very high abundances and both actinostolid anemones and Sericosura spp. were frequent. Occasionally, halichondriid sponges (figure 2d) were seen and several lone specimens of Neolepas scotiaensis were present. Towards the outer edges of this biotope, very occasional non-vent-associated fauna, such as the sessile holothurians (genus Psolus) and cnidarians (genus Anthomastus), were recorded.

3.2.1.5. Clam Road (CR)

The bank just south of the resurgent cone hosted the ‘Clam Road’ biotope (figure 2h), characterized by rough-edged basalt and frequent vesicomyid clams living epilithically. The most common species were the cocculinid limpet, Lepetodrilus concentricus, and pycnogonids of the genus Sericosura, with actinostolid anemones and halichondriid sponges being occasionally present. Within the finer sediment rubble collected by the suction sampler, several species of polychaetes belonging to several families were present (table 1).

3.2.1.6. Precipitated Sediment (PS)

Near the ‘Winter Palace’ biotope, large areas of flat, sedimented seafloors were covered in white precipitate with the occasional basalt rock penetrating the surface (figure 2k). A characteristic area for this biotope is the ‘Glacier’ locality (figure 1e). Lepetodrilus concentricus and Sericosura spp. sea spiders were seen on dense white precipitate, while the vesicomyid clam Archivesica s.l. puertodeseadoi was frequently seen burrowed in areas with thinner precipitate cover. Collections in this area revealed the presence of thyasirid bivalves and several polychaete species. Specimens of the actinostolid anemone and the cocculinid limpet were less abundant in this biotope and mostly found on the basalt outcrops. The sediments taken, coated in pale bacterial mats, in this biotope had a strong sulfur odour and contained tubes of Sclerolinum worms (figure 3h). Some of the precipitate-covered seafloor areas formed ‘dead zones’ in which numerous dead Nematocarcinus shrimps and squids were seen lying on the white precipitate. Sericosura spp. sea spiders were seen in clusters over individual dead shrimps and were presumed to be feeding on them.

3.2.1.7. Coarse Sediment in Diffuse Flow (CSDF)

The top of the bank south of the resurgent cone was influenced by diffuse venting and covered by coarse-grained anhydrite aggregates and basalt fragments (figure 2i), which led to the location name ‘Ash Mount’. The macrofauna there was dominated by very high abundances of Sericosura spp. and the cocculinid limpet, with the occasional L. concentricus and actinostolid anemone. No vesicomyid clams, common in the adjacent biotope ‘Clam Road’, were present here.

3.2.1.8. Fine Sediment in Diffuse Flow (FSDF)

This biotope, defined by fine sediments in the influence of the diffuse flow, was characterized by clusters of burrowing vesicomyid clams. Thyasirid bivalves [79] lived infaunally among the vesicomyid clams and the sea star Paulasterias tyleri was also observed on the clam beds. Individuals of the shrimp Nematocarcinus sp. were seen walking around on the sediment and occasionally siboglinid worm tubes and ophiuroids could be seen.

3.2.1.9. Basalt covered in white mat (BWM)

The ‘BWM’ biotope is characterized by the presence of halichondriid sponges and a fine white bacterial or mineral precipitate cover on the basalt (figure 2d). In this biotope, few macrofauna were seen apart from sponges and the occasional sea star Paulasterias tyleri. Towards the border of this zone, near areas influenced by hydrothermal activity, macrofauna associated with the hydrothermal environment including Sericosura spp., the cocculinid limpet, and actinostolid anemones began to appear; initially animals were rare, but they then increased in numbers as the abundance of the halichondriid sponge decreased.

Overall, the Kemp Caldera vent field showed a consistent pattern of faunal zonation, with changing assemblage types in different biotopes and with increasing distance from the hot vent fluid source (figure 4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Idealized schematic of the spatial distribution of the Kemp Caldera vent field faunal assemblages with increasing distance from sulfur vent or vent fluid orifice.

3.2.2. Vent biotope associated macro- and megafauna

In total, 26 benthic species were recovered from the chemosynthetic biotopes in the Kemp Caldera (table 1), of which ten taxa were known from non-chemosynthetic environments in the Southern Ocean, and 13 species have so far been discovered only at hydrothermally active areas.

The demosponge dominating the fauna in the ‘BWM’ biotope and occasionally occurring in diffuse flow areas was identified as a species belonging to the family Halichondriidae based on the morphology of the simple spicules (D. Janussen 2011, personal communication).

The actinostolid anemones with dark red tentacles were relatively large with a pedal disc greater than 10 cm diameter. The tentacles were armed with strong cnidocytes, which stung through double-layered nitrile examination gloves resulting in a numbing, tingling sensation (C.N. Roterman 2010, personal communication). This species occurred in six of the biotopes but highest abundances were seen in ‘BDF’ and ‘CR’.

The small vent limpet Lepetodrilus concentricus occurred in six of the eight hydrothermal biotopes in the Kemp Caldera as well as on the natural whale fall [78], but was missing in the toxic environment of ‘GW’ and in the outermost area influenced by diffuse flow, the ‘BWM’ biotope. Molecular analysis of the barcode gene region of COI confirmed that Lepetodrilus limpets from the Kemp Caldera were conspecific with L. concentricus from the ESR vents [33,80].

The cocculinid limpet was the visually most abundant species in the hydrothermal biotopes being found in six of them and was also found on the natural whale fall. The gill morphology suggests affinity to Cocculinidae within the order Cocculinida [81,82]

The large vesicomyid clam was present in six biotopes of the Kemp Caldera, showing two different lifestyle modes; one group was seen buried in the soft sediments, while the other was seen living epilithically on basalt. Morphologically, based on shell and soft part characteristics, the specimens resemble Archivesica s.l. puertodeseadoi (Signorelli & Pastorino, 2015) (E. Krylova 2019, personal communication). To determine the presence of endosymbionts in the gill tissue, clone libraries were constructed for 16S rDNA and resulted in 16 sequences from epifaunal and 115 sequences from infaunal specimens. The sequence analysis showed that only one single symbiotic species of Gammaproteobacteria from the SUP05 cluster is present in the vesicomyid clams in the Kemp Caldera. The phylogenetic identification in the arb search indicated a species of Oceanospirillales, an endosymbiont in vesicomyid clams off Florida, as the closest relative (figure 5).

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Phylogenetic position of the Kemp Caldera 16S rRNA sequences (in bold) from the water and the vesicomyid endosymbiont within the SUP05 cluster. Sequences were added to the Silva102 guide tree by parsimony. Bootstrap values (only values greater than 50 are shown) were calculated by nearest neighbour interchange within arb.

In the precipitate and diffuse flow fine sediment areas, a few specimens of thyasarid bivalves were found and identified as Spinaxinus caldarium and Parathyasira cf. dearborni [79]. While P. cf. dearborni did not host symbiotic bacteria, S. caldarium hosted endosymbiotic bacteria in their gills, which were of the same phylotype as symbiotic bacteria in Spinaxinus emicatus from the Gulf of Mexico [79]. Siboglinid polychaetes matching the tube morphology of Sclerolinum contortum were found in sulfidic sediments at ‘PS’ (figure 3h). The maldanid Nicomache lokii was found at ‘PS’, ‘CR’ and ‘FSDF’.

The stalked neolepadid barnacles occasionally found on the basalt of the diffuse flow areas were Neolepas scotiaensis, a species described from the ESR vents at segment E2 and E9 and also the Kemp Caldera [34]. As only three barnacle specimens were collected in Kemp and used for taxonomy, no material was available for stable isotope analysis.

The medium-sized pycnogonids present in the Kemp hydrothermal biotopes belonged to three species of the vent-affiliated genus Sericosura [56]. Molecular COI sequence analysis showed that Sericosura bamberi, S. curva and S. dimorpha were closely related to each other and form a sister clade to Sericosura venticola from Northern Pacific vents [56].

The multi-armed (7- to 8-armed) forcipulatacean sea star reported from clam fields and basalts in low diffuse flow areas belong to the recently described Paulasterias tyleri [35]. Only four specimens of P. tyleri were collected in the Kemp Caldera and were used for taxonomic identification.

3.3. Faunal similarity of the vent assemblage at Kemp Caldera with vent fields in neighbouring regions

Multivariate analyses of the presence/absence data for 159 macrofaunal and megafaunal taxa endemic to chemosynthetic environments from 16 vent fields in the Southern, Indian and Atlantic Oceans (figure 6a) show that the vent fauna at Kemp Caldera is most similar to faunal assemblages at E2 and E9 hydrothermal vent fields on the ESR, but with a lower degree of similarity than that found between those two ESR vent fields (figure 6b). The vent fauna of Kemp Caldera was most similar to the fauna at E9, showing a 44% Sørensen similarity, followed by E2 with a 32% Sørensen similarity, while E2 and E9 exhibited 85% Sørensen similarity. At a regional scale, vent fields within each ocean (Southern, Indian and Atlantic) were more similar to each other in faunal composition than to those in other oceans (figure 6b,c).

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Comparison of vent faunal composition at the Kemp Caldera with 16 well-studied vent fields in neighbouring oceanic regions; red-filled circles represent vent fields in the Indian Ocean (Southwest Indian Ridge and Central Indian Ridge), yellow-filled circles represent vent fields on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, black-filled circles represent vent fields in the Southern Ocean. (a) Location of hydrothermal vent fields included in multivariate analysis of faunal composition; topography shown is from the Global Multi-Resolution Topography (GMRT) synthesis (http://www.geomapapp.org/). (b) Hierarchical agglomerative clustering using group-average linkage for the presence/absence records of ‘chemosynthetic-environment endemic’ macro- and megafaunal taxa (329 records of 159 taxa across 17 vent fields, presented in the electronic supplementary material). (c) Two-dimensional non-metric multidimensional scaling (MDS) plot of Sørensen Index similarity matrix calculated from the presence/absence records of ‘chemosynthetic-environment endemic’ macro- and megafaunal taxa, with 5% metric MDS solution to reduce point-collapse.

3.4. Macro- and megafauna of non-venting environments

3.4.1. Pelagic fauna

A high abundance of pelagic fauna, especially nekton, was observed in the water column of the caldera and some seemed to follow the ROV Isis, presumably attracted to the lights of the underwater camera systems. Several species of megafaunal pelagic crustaceans were present, e.g. the Antarctic krill Euphausia superba, dark red mysids and the bentho-pelagic shrimp Nematocarcinus lanceopes, as well as individuals of large jellyfish, similar to the genus Poralia (D. Lindsay 2014, personal communication) and comb jellies. In near-bottom waters different fish species were present. Once a large toothfish Dissostichus mawsoni was seen, while often individuals of two different macrourid species (rattails), a muraenolepid and the paralepidid Notolepis annulata were observed in non-venting areas. Three morphotypes of squid were reported; a mid-sized (approx. 40 cm) red-coloured species was identified as Alluroteuthis antarcticus (L. Allcock 2013, personal communication), a smaller (approx. 20 cm) white species was identified as Slosarczykovia circumantarctica and a red-spotted squid similar to Moroteuthis knipovitchi was also seen but less frequently.

3.4.2. Benthic fauna

The general benthic faunal distribution in the Kemp Caldera were assessed based on a single SHRIMP transect from the deepest point of the caldera via the resurgent cone to the NE rim during JR224, while ROV Isis dived several times on the resurgent cone during JC042 and enabled a closer examination of the sediments and taxa present. The seabed in the deeper part of the caldera was covered with a thin sediment layer, interrupted by a series of lava outcrops, giving way to a cobbled seafloor closer to the resurgent cone, which is described in detail below. Mobile species of holothurians were abundant on the sedimented floor of the caldera, oriented in the same direction, along with occasional dense patches of cerianthid sea anemones and some asteroids. Lava outcrops were dominated by dense coverage of ophiuroids, with brisingid asteroids and other suspension feeders including soft coral, sponges and sea anemones also occasionally present. The caldera wall towards the rim consisted of a series of sheer faces of lava displaying hexagonal cooling joints. The fauna there was dominated by ophiacanthid ophiuroids, particularly on lava blocks at the base of the wall of hexagonal columns. The hexagonal cooling joints were occupied by yellow tube-forming sponges, with brisingids and ophiacanthids on the upper edges of pillar steps.

On the lower eastern flank of the resurgent cone around 1415 m deep, orange-coloured metalliferous, raised sediment structures were present with orange-coloured soft sediments covering the seafloor between them (figure 2a). No epifaunal macrobenthic specimens were visible on these sediments or on the orange structures, but notothenioid (e.g. Notolepis annulata) and macrourid fishes, as well as krill could be seen in the area. When the soft sediment colour changed to grey-brown and rough-edged basalt boulders appeared on the flank higher up the resurgent cone, epifaunal macrofauna specimens became present, increasing in abundance with increasing distance from the orange-coloured substrates (figure 2b,c). The areas of the resurgent cone were under no influence of hydrothermal activity and hosted benthic faunal assemblages similar to those known from the Antarctic and Southern Ocean continental slope and deep-sea plains. The sessile faunal component on the basalt consisted of cnidarians, especially hormathiid anemones and octocorals of the genus Anthomastus, bryozoans similar to Hornea sp., the stauromedusae Lacunaria sp., sabellid polychaetes, psolid holothurians, as well as synascidians, while no hexactinellid sponges were recorded. The comatulid Promachochrinus sp. and the brisingid Freyella cf. fragilissima were observed on raised boulders. In the sedimented areas, burrowing anemones, the pennatularian Umbellula carpenteri and a variety of asteroids, ophiuroids, holothurians and echinoids (Sterechinus dentifer, Ctenocidaris spinosa) were present and the bentho-pelagic shrimp Nematocarcinus lanceopes was also seen. The majority of observed macrofauna were mobile species like the nemertean Parbolasia cf. corrugatus, the decapod Eualus amandae, the gastropods Austrodoris kerguelensis and a pleurobranchid, several species of the polychaete families Dorvilleidae, Polynoidae, Maldanidae, Scalibregmatidae, Hesionidae, Ampharetidae, Amphinomidae, the pygnogonids Nymphon cf. longicoxa and Colossendeis sp. A variety of echinoderms was seen, including ophiuroids like Ophiolimna antarctica, Ophioperla sp. and ophiacanthids, asteroids, e.g. Hymenaster cf. coccinatus, Odontaster penicillatus and holothurians including Bathyplotes cf. gourdoni, Protelipidia sp., Elaspodida sp., Scotoplanes sp., Molpadiodemas sp. The ecology of O. antarctica collected away from the hydrothermally active sites in the Kemp Caldera was studied and no apparent influence of venting on the diet of the ophiuroid was observed [83].

The abundance and presence of the Southern Ocean benthic species decreased nearer to the hydrothermal active zones. In the ‘BWM’ zone, the outermost hydrothermally active biotope defined by the halicondriid sponges, psolid holothurians were occasionally observed.

3.5. Microbiology

The number of prokaryotic cells (determined by flow cytometry) in water samples taken at five points within the vent plume in the Kemp Caldera ranged 1.70–2.15 × 105 cells ml−1. Examination of the microbial composition based on 16S rDNA clone libraries from one water sample taken within the buoyant vent plume (60 m above the chimney) at ‘GW’ showed that Gammaproteobacteria make up 95% of the bacterial community (table 3). Within the Gammaproteobacteria, the majority of sequences (57% of total bacterial sequences) were assigned to the SUP05 cluster (figure 5), with high sequence similarity (greater than 98%) to uncultured free-living bacteria found in other vent systems and moderate sequence similarity (95–97%) to vesicomyid symbionts. Archaeal sequences were split into two groups: marine group I (Crenarchaeota), making up 72% of the sequences and Thermoplasmatales (Euryarchaeota) making up the rest (28%).

Table 3.

Microbial composition based on 16S rDNA clone libraries from the buoyant vent plume at ‘Great Wall’.

sequences %
Archaea 47 100
Crenarchaeota—marine group I 34 72
Euryarchaeota—Thermoplasmatales 13 28
Bacteria 87 100
Bacteroidetes—Flammeovirgaceae 1 1
Proteobacteria 86 99
 Alphaproteobacteria—SAR11 1 1
 Deltaproteobacteria—SAR324 2 2
 Gammaproteobacteria 83 95
  Alteromonadales—Alteromonadaceae 16 18
  Oceanospirillales—Halomonadaceae 10 11
  Oceanospirillales—SUP05 cluster 50 57
  Oceanospirillales—other 4 5
  Pseudomonadales 3 3

3.6. Trophodynamics

The mean δ13C values of hydrothermal vent macrofauna covered a range of 19.04‰ with the minimum value of −40.93‰ (±0.28 s.d.) observed in the Halichondriidae sp. sampled at ‘BWM’ and the maximum value of −21.89‰ (±2.25 s.d.) in S. bamberi found in ‘CSDF’ (table 2). The large vesicomyid clam, Archivesica s.l. puertodeseadoi, was noticeably depleted in 12C relative to other hydrothermal macrofauna with δ13C values of −35.61‰ (±0.36 s.d.) at ‘FSDF’ and −35.20‰ (±0.38 s.d.) at ‘CR’. Mean δ15N values ranged from −6.47‰ (±0.52 s.d.) in A. s.l. puertodeseadoi from ‘FSDF’ to 8.64‰ (±1.73 s.d.) in S. bamberi found in ‘CSDF’. Archivesica s.l. puertodeseadoi was the only species with negative δ15N values, with all other hydrothermal vent macrofauna having values greater than 2.81‰, which was found in the Terebellidae spp. from ‘CR’. The minimum mean δ34S value was observed in the Halichondriidae sp. at ‘BWM’ (3.53‰ ± 0.25 s.d.) while the maximum value was observed in Actinostolidae sp. (15.05‰ ± 1.51 s.d.) in the ‘BDF’ biotope. The ranges of stable isotope values of the non-vent fauna in the Kemp Caldera were much narrower than those within chemosynthetic habitats: δ13C from −26.95‰ (±0.81 s.d.) in the echinoid to −22.29‰ (±0.27 s.d.) in the ophiuroid Ophiolimna antarctica; δ15N from 7.25‰ (±0.08 s.d.) Bathyplotes sp. to 14.99‰ in Odontaster penicillatus; and for δ34S the minimum value observed was 16.03‰ in the Macrouridae sp. and the maximum was 18.93‰ in the octocoral Anthomastus sp.

4. Discussion

The investigation of the Kemp Caldera resulted in discoveries of a resurgent cone with hydrothermally active venting areas and a natural whale fall (characterized by Amon et al. [78]) and of a wide range of marine species, distributed over several biotopes with distinct communities and environmental characteristics. The ‘dead zone’ of pelagic animal carcasses on the seafloor in the ‘PS’ biotope is similar to that reported in island-arc vents in the Pacific [53] and Caribbean [54], and native sulfur deposits found at Kemp Caldera are also common in sites in the Mariana and Kermadec arcs [84]. The most abundant megafaunal taxa in hydrothermally active venting areas of the Kemp Caldera included a large vesicomyid clam living both infaunally and epibenthically, cocculinid and lepetodrilid limpets, the sea spiders Sericosura spp., and actinostolid anemones. The overall biomass at Kemp Caldera's hydrothermal active areas appeared lower when compared with that of the ESR vent fields [27,36].

The vent biotopes and assemblages at the Kemp Caldera differed from those of the E2 and E9 vent fields on the nearby ESR: although seven species were shared between the Kemp Caldera and the ESR vent fields (table 4), the stalked barnacle N. scotiaensis and sea star P. tyleri were rare at Kemp, and several species that are abundant at ESR vents were not observed at Kemp Caldera, including the yeti crab K. tyleri and the gastropods G. chessoia, Bruceiella indurata [85] and Provanna cooki [86]. Although the Kemp Caldera is geographically closest to the E9 vent field (90 km distance), the vent fauna at Kemp Caldera exhibited only a 44% Sørensen Index of similarity with the vent fauna at E9, whereas E2 and E9 exhibit 85% Sørensen similarity between them despite being 440 km apart (figure 6). This difference is consistent with island-arc vent assemblages being distinct from those on seafloor spreading centres in the same region, and here may result from differences in vent fluid geochemistry, seafloor type and depth.

Table 4.

Comparison of Kemp Caldera chemosynthetic fauna with other Southern Ocean hydrothermal fauna.

hydrothermal site
  species Kemp E2 E9 AAR-KR1 BS-HR  Larsen-B Kemp-WF sister taxa
Cnidaria
 Anthozoa Actinostolidae sp. 1 + Pac, Atl
Actinostolidae sp. 2 + Pac, Atl
Actinostolidae sp. 3 + Pac, Atl
Annelida  
 Polychaeta Sclerolinum contortum (+) + Pac, Atl
Nicomanche lokii + + Atl
Mollusca
 Gastropoda Gigantopelta chessoia + + Ind
Lepetodrilus concentricus + + + + Pac, Atl, Ind
Cocculinidae sp. + + Pac
Provanna cooki + + Pac, Atl
Bruceiella indurata + + + Pac
 Bivalvia Spinaxinus caldarium + Pac, Atl
Parathyasira cf. dearborni + SO
Archivesica s.l. puertodeseadoi + + Pac, Atl
Arthropoda
 Cirripedia Neolepas scotiaensis + + + Pac
 Decapoda Kiwa tyleri + + Pac, Ind
Kiwa araonae + Pac, Ind
 Pycnogonida Sericosura bamberi + + + + Pac, Atl
Sericosura curva + + + + Pac, Atl
Sericosura dimorpha + + + + Pac, Atl
Echinodermata
 Asteroidea Paulasterias tyleri + + + + Pac

Hydrothermal venting at Kemp Caldera was characterized by ‘white smoker’ chimneys releasing fluids at temperatures between 103 and 212°C [58], with wide-ranging diffuse flow in basalt and sedimented seafloor areas from 1375 to 1487 m depth. The vent fluid composition differed from the E9 site, which is located 90 km away in approximately 2400 m depth, being high in hydrogen sulfide and iron concentrations and with evidence for an input of magmatic gas [29,48]. By contrast, the E2 and E9 vent fields, the latter around 440 km away in approximately 2600 m depth, were characterized by pillow basalts, sheet lavas and ‘black smoker’ chimneys emitting vent fluids 351 to 383°C in temperature [27], with a fluid composition similar to that reported from other basalt-hosted vent sites on seafloor-spreading centres [30].

The microbial composition in the buoyant plume of the Kemp Caldera venting chimneys was different from the microbial communities reported from the buoyant vent plumes of the black smoking chimneys from the ESR segments E2 and E9 [27]. At the Kemp Caldera, the bacterial community was with 95% highly dominated by Gammaproteobacteria, particularly of the SUP05 cluster which represented 57% of the total community, compared to the ESR sites E2 and E9, where proteobacteria represented 70% and 66% of the bacterial communities of which 58% and 55% were Gammaproteobacteria, respectively, and SUP05 contributing only 9% and 19% to the Gammaproteobacteria. The Gammaproteobacteria at the ESR sites were dominated by bacterial symbionts of vent fauna [27]. Furthermore, Alphaproteobacteria of the SAR11 clade were common at ESR (16% and 21% of the total community), but rare (1% of total community) at the Kemp Caldera. Members of the SUP05 cluster are known to be sulfur oxidizers [8789]. The analysis of water samples from CTD cast collected over ‘GW’ in the Kemp Caldera showed sulfur-rich fluids (D.P. Connelly 2019, personal communication). With regard to carbon fixation, the presence of both the cbbM gene [87] and its gene product, ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RuBisCo) [88], has been shown in SUP05 communities at other hydrothermal vent settings. This implies that the SUP05 bacteria may be dominant microbial primary producers in the water column above Kemp Caldera venting sites.

Differences in substrate may also contribute to the differences in the vent faunal assemblage at Kemp Caldera compared with the E2 and E9 vent fields on the nearby ESR. The lack of soft sediment in the immediate vicinity of the chimneys at E2 and E9 on the ESR may preclude the presence of the vesicomyid bivalves, and the sulfur and anhydrite composition of the brittle chimney structures at the Kemp Caldera may limit the available surfaces for the growth of N. scotiaensis barnacles. Differences in geochemistry between the ESR and the Kemp Caldera may also account for some of the discrepancy in assemblages. The depth difference between the ESR and Kemp Caldera vent fields (approx. 1700 m including the caldera rim) may also act as a dispersal filter, as discussed by Roterman et al. [80], favouring the dispersal of Lepetodrilus spp., with their small and numerous larvae, compared with taxa such as Kiwa tyleri that have fewer, larger and probably non-buoyant larvae [90,91]. Additionally, the presence of Lepetodrilus concentricus at the whale carcass in the Kemp Caldera [78], and the presence of the genus at hard and soft substrate vents, seeps and whale falls in general [92] suggests that these limpets may have a wider selection of dispersal stepping stones available to them than other fauna endemic to chemosynthesis-based ecosystems.

Multivariate analysis of faunal composition of vent fields at a regional scale shows that the Kemp Caldera is most similar to the ESR vent fields that define a previously recognized ‘Southern Ocean’ province of vent biogeography [24,27,3135], and distinct from vents in neighbouring oceans (figure 6). One species found at the vents in Kemp Caldera, however, has also been recorded at hydrothermal vents on the Southwest Indian Ridge the pycnogonid Sericosura bamberi at the Duanqiao vent field [64]. The polychaetes Nicomache lokii and Sclerolinum contortum were the only two megafauna species collected at the Kemp Caldera for which wide-ranging, bipolar distributions have been reported [24,25], though neither have been recorded at vents in the Indian Ocean or on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge.

Further to records from the ESR and Kemp Caldera, the predatory sea star Paulasterias tyleri has also been collected at the South Sandwich Island, the Ross Sea and the Australian Antarctic Ridge [28,35]. Live specimens and shells of the vesicomyid Archivesica s.l. puertodeseadoi have been compared with vesicomyid shell fragments from the Larsen B extinct seepage sites [19,20] and assigned to the same species (E. Krylova 2019, personal communication). No live vesicomyid specimens have yet been collected or reported from the Larsen B or other areas covered by ice shelves [1820], but the presence of active seepage under ice shelves has been predicted by Ingels et al. [93].

Fauna found in venting areas at Kemp Caldera exhibit some distributional overlaps with the natural whale fall that was also found on the resurgent cone. Amon et al. [78,94] reported 11 macrofaunal species on the nearby whale fall that probably harvest the bones directly or feed on bacterial mats growing on them, including three species of the bone-boring Osedax polychaetes [94], two species of dorvilleid Ophryotrocha and one capitellid polychaete, the janaerid isopod Jaera tyleri [95], one species of lysianassid amphipod, and one species each of lepetodrilid, cocculinid and pyropeltid gastropods. Of these species, only the lepetodrilid and cocculinid gastropods were found in the Kemp Caldera vent biotopes, indicating that the other species reported from the whale fall may be dependent on food sources provided by decaying whale bones, but not by hydrothermal environments.

The majority of the seafloor in the caldera, away from the resurgent cone, was not affected by hydrothermal activity and the fauna resembled that reported from comparable bathyal depths elsewhere in the Southern Ocean [96,97]. Biodiversity assessments on the bathyal Southern Ocean benthic fauna are still sparse and limited to sedimented areas suitable for trawling [98101], restricting direct faunal comparisons. Species characteristics of Southern Ocean deep waters, such as Umbellula carpenteri and Sterechinus dentifer, were present in the Kemp Caldera [102,103]. The non-vent fauna of the Kemp Caldera also included a species of hippolytid shrimp, Eualus amandae, which has remained undescribed until recently [104].

The macrofauna associated with the hydrothermal venting areas of the Kemp Caldera showed signs of using chemosynthetic primary production. The δ13C values of Halichondriidae sp. and the large vesicomyid clam, Archivesica s.l. puertodeseadoi, were clearly less than those of benthic species depending on epipelagic photosynthetic primary production in the form of sinking particulate organic matter (POM) on the ESR (δ13C, approx. −26 to −21‰ [37]) and those reported here. The sponge Halichondriidae sp. had particularly low δ13C values being less than −40‰. Methanotrophic bacteria are associated with Demospongiae from hydrothermal vent and cold seep habitats [105,106] and it may be that methanotrophic bacteria were contributing to the carbon pool of Halichondriidae sp. The δ13C values of A. s.l. puertodeseadoi were consistent with other species of vesicomyid collected from other hydrothermal vent settings, which range between approximately −37‰ and approximately −32‰ [107109]. The vesicomyid endosymbionts were within the SUP05 cluster of the Gammaproteobacteria, which fixes carbon using the RuBisCo enzyme and would indicate that chemosynthetic primary production is via the Calvin–Benson–Bassham cycle.

The other species sampled within the hydrothermal vent biotopes (approx. −27 ‰ to approx. −21‰) had δ13C values that overlapped with those of species from non-venting areas (approx. −26‰ to approx. −22‰). These hydrothermal vent organisms are probably using chemosynthetic primary production fixed by free-living Gammaproteobacteria using the RuBisCo II enzyme, which has a lower isotopic fractionation than RuBisCo I enzyme [110], rather than using photosynthetic POM. The polychaetes, Terebellidae spp. and Maldanidae spp., have lower δ15N values than would be expected from consuming photosynthetic POM and are therefore likely to represent in situ production [111]. This is clearly evidenced in the δ34S values of the cocculinid limpet and S. bamberi, which ranged between approximately 4‰ and approximately 8‰ and are much lower than would be expected for deep-sea fauna using photosynthetic POM as an energy source [37,112]. The only exception is the actinostolid, which was found in the ‘BDF’ biotope, which had δ34S values of approximately 15‰ and therefore similar to the non-vent fauna (approx. 16‰ to approx. 18‰). This indicates that photosynthetic primary production may be contributing to the diet of this anemone. Interestingly, S. bamberi was observed feeding on dead carrion including Notolepis annulata and Nematocarcinus lanceopes, but the stable isotope values do not indicate that these constitute potentially high contributions to the diet.

The lowest δ13C values were found within S. bamberi (−21.89‰) and were lower than those expected for organisms using carbon fixed via the reductive tricarboxylic acid (rTCA) cycle (−15‰ to −10‰) [113]. Carbon fixation via the rTCA cycle at hydrothermal vents is predominately carried out by Epsilonproteobacteria. Hydrothermal vent fauna using this source of production are often found close to the vent orifice where temperatures are high and the reducing conditions are stronger than other areas of the vent habitat. δ13C values of hydrothermal vent fauna at arc volcano and caldera, including the Brothers Caldera, NW Eifuku Volcano and Sumisu hydrothermal vents, indicate that rTCA primary production can enter the food web [107,114,115]. However, none of the hydrothermal vent fauna sampled for δ13C analysis had values that were indicative of this production source within Kemp Caldera.

The pelagic fauna within the Kemp Caldera appeared to be high in abundance, but no pelagic sampling was carried out to verify these subjective observations, to compare with abundance data from adjacent areas like the South Sandwich Islands and to test if the pelagic fauna was using chemosynthetic primary production. Studies of the potential influence of hydrothermal vent plumes on biological communities in the water column are a neglected field [116]. Hydrothermal vent plumes are enriched with abundant and active communities of chemosynthetic prokaryotes (e.g. [117120]) as well as POM [119]. This enhanced supply of POM has the potential to act as a food source for deep-water zooplankton communities and therefore may exert an influence on pelagic food webs in the proximity of hydrothermal vents and their plumes. Acoustic and net sampling studies over the Endeavour Segment of the Juan de Fuca Ridge, NE Pacific, have consistently demonstrated the enhancement of deep-scattering layers overlying vent plumes at 19002100 m (e.g. [121125]). These scattering layers were predominantly formed by deep-living copepods (e.g. Neocalanus sp.) but also comprised chaetognaths, other crustaceans and gelatinous zooplankton. Zooplankton in the vicinity of vent plumes have been demonstrated to have unusual δ15N values consistent with feeding on production from the vent plume, as well as sinking organic matter and that upwelling from the seafloor [126]. It is likely in this locality that zooplankton migration and the release of eggs and larvae that move upwards in the water column are enhancing production in the region from deep waters to the epipelagic zone. Zooplankton production over the vents may be double or triple that of the background ocean [125]. High abundances of gelatinous zooplankton have been observed in the vicinity of vents in the southwest Pacific and in the Okinawa Trough (e.g. [127,128]). Large pelagic predators have also been seen within hydrothermal plumes in the shallow waters of Kavachi volcano crater in the Solomon Islands [127]. Observations from hydrophones on the Juan de Fuca Ridge also suggest that blue and fin whale may be feeding in the vicinity of the hydrothermal plumes because of the enhanced zooplankton production [129,130]. Incidental observations from other localities also hint at connectivity between vent plumes and wider ocean food webs. Larvae of vent endemic megafauna may also be enriched in vent plumes, providing another food source for pelagic organisms. However, although larvae have been sampled from vent plumes (e.g. [131,132]), their numbers have been small and understanding of the larval flux from vents to the pelagic ecosystem remains poorly defined [111]. Large pelagic megafauna, like whales, dying and decaying near vent sites might also provide a food source and stepping stone for some vent organisms [133]. The presence of the natural whale fall in the Kemp Caldera is an example of specialized species being shared between chemosynthetic food sources [78].

5. Conclusion

The Kemp Caldera at the southern end of the volcanic South Sandwich Arc hosts a unique hydrothermally influenced ecosystem with different biotopes and a composition of macro- and megafaunal species not found anywhere else to date. The chemosynthetic communities include species like the bivalve Spinaxinus caldarium and an undescribed cocculinid limpet, which are as yet specific to this location, while some species are shared with the ESR vent fields or even vent fields further away. Biogeographically, the Kemp Caldera vent field belongs to the Southern Ocean vent province. This discovery of active hydrothermal venting sites with associated chemosynthetic communities in relatively shallow bathyal waters of the Southern Ocean suggests the presence of further hydrothermal ecosystems on unexplored seamount, submarine caldera and crater sites of the South Sandwich Arc.

Supplementary Material

Table S1
rsos191501supp1.docx (3.8MB, docx)
Reviewer comments

Supplementary Material

Table S2
rsos191501supp2.docx (3.3MB, docx)

Acknowledgements

We thank the masters and crews of RRS James Clark Ross and RRS James Cook and the staff of the UK National Marine Facilities at NOC, especially the ROV Isis team, and the science teams on board for logistic, technical and shipboard support during JR224 and JC042. We are also grateful to two anonymous reviewers, who provided comments that improved the manuscript.

Ethics

Permission to collect samples in Antarctica was granted to P. Tyler by the Foreign and Commonwealth Office London (permit S3–3/2009) under §3 of the Antarctic Act 1994 and authorization was given to the persons specified in electronic supplementary material, Appendix I, to enter and remain in Antarctica for the purpose of scientific research. No special ‘Animal Care Protocol’ was required at the time.

Data accessibility

Our genetic data are deposited at GenBank accessions numbers MK736312–MK736351. The datasets supporting this article have been uploaded as part of the electronic supplementary material.

Authors' contributions

K.L., J.T.C., A.D.R., W.D.K.R. and K.Z. drafted the manuscript, K.L., J.T.C., V.A.I.H., A.G.C.G., L.M., W.D.K.R. and K.Z. prepared figures and tables, C.C., A.C., D.P.C., J.T.C., A.D.R., A.G.C.G., V.A.I.H., K.L., R.D.L., L.M., D.A.P., N.V.C.P., W.D.K.R., C.N.R., C.J.S., P.A.T. and K.Z. were involved in fieldwork, analyses and manuscript edits. All authors gave final approval for publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Funding

Financial support came from UK's Natural Environmental Research Council (Consortium grant no. NE/DO1249X/1, PhD studentships NE/D01429X/1, NE/F010664/1) and the Sloan Foundation (Census of Marine Life).

References

  • 1.Ross JC. 1847. A voyage of discovery and research in the Southern and Antarctic regions, during the years 1839–43, vol. 1, pp. 216.–: . London, UK: John Murray. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.LeMasurier WE, Thomson JW, Baker PE, Kyle PR, Rowley PD, Smellie JL, Verwoerd WJ. 1990. Volcanoes of the Antarctic Plate and Southern Oceans. Ant. Res. Ser. 48, 1–487. ( 10.1029/AR048) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Convey P, Lewis Smith RI. 2006. Geothermal bryophyte habitats in the South Sandwich Islands, maritime Antarctic. J. Veg. Sci. 17, 529–538. ( 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2006.tb02474.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Civile D, Lodolo E, Vuan A, Loreto MF. 2012. Tectonics of the Scotia–Antarctica plate boundary constrained from seismic and seismological data. Tectonophysics 550–553, 17–34. ( 10.1016/j.tecto.2012.05.002) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Blankenship DD, Brozena RB, Behrendt JC, Finn CA. 1993. Active volcanism beneath the West Antarctic ice sheet and implications for ice-sheet stability. Nature 361, 526–529. ( 10.1038/361526a0) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.German CR, et al. 2000. Hydrothermal plumes above the East Scotia Ridge: an isolated high-latitude back-arc spreading centre. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 184, 241–250. ( 10.1016/S0012-821X(00)00319-8) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Leat PT, Livermore RA, Millar IL, Pearce JAPT. 2000. Magma supply in back-arc spreading centre segment E2, East Scotia Ridge. J. Petrol. 41, 845–866. ( 10.1093/petrology/41.6.845) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.De Vries M van Wyk, Bingham RG, Hein AS. 2018. A new volcanic province: an inventory of subglacial volcanoes in West Antarctica. In Exploration of subsurface Antarctica: uncovering past changes and modern processes, vol. 461 (eds Siegert MJ, Jamieson SSR, White DA), pp. 231–248. Geological Society, London, Special Publications. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gallardo VA, Castillo JG. 1968. Mass mortality in the benthic infauna of Port Foster resulting from the eruptions in Deception Island, (South Shetland Islands). Publ. Instituto Antartico Chileno 16, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lovell LL, Trego KD. 2003. The epibenthic megafaunal and benthic infaunal invertebrates of Port Foster, Deception Island (South Shetland Islands Antarctica). Deep-Sea Res. Part II 50, 1799–1819. ( 10.1016/S0967-0645(03)00087-0) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Barnes DKA, Linse K, Enderlein P, Smale D, Fraser KPP, Brown M. 2008. Marine richness and gradients at Deception Island. Antarctica. Ant. Sci. 20, 271–279. ( 10.1017/S0954102008001090) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bohrmann G, et al. 1999. Hydrothermal activity at Hook Ridge in the Central Bransfield Basin, Antarctica. Geo. Marine Lett. 18, 277–284. ( 10.1007/s003670050080) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Dählmann A, Wallmann K, Sahling H, Sarthou G, Bohrmann G, Petersen S, Chin CS, Klinkhammer GP. 2001. Hot vents in an ice-cold ocean: indications for phase separation at the southernmost area of hydrothermal activity, Bransfield Strait, Antarctica. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 193, 381–394. ( 10.1016/S0012-821X(01)00535-0) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Klinkhammer GP, Chin CS, Keller RA, Dahlmann A, Sahling H, Sarthou G, Petersen S, Smith F, Wilson C. 2001. Discovery of new hydrothermal vent sites in Bransfield Strait, Antarctica. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 193, 395–407. ( 10.1016/S0012-821X(01)00536-2) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Petersen S, Herzig PM, Schwarz-Schampera U, Hannington MD, Jonasson IR. 2004. Hydrothermal precipitates associated with bimodal volcanism in the Central Bransfield Strait, Antarctica. Miner. Deposita 39, 358–379. ( 10.1007/s00126-004-0414-3) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Aquilina A, et al. 2013. Geochemical and visual indicators of hydrothermal fluid flow through a sediment-hosted volcanic ridge in the Central Bransfield Basin (Antarctica). PLoS ONE 8, e54686 ( 10.1371/journal.pone.0054686) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bell JB, Woulds C, Brown LE, Sweeting CJ, Reid WDK, Little CTS, Glover AG. 2016. Macrofaunal ecology of sedimented hydrothermal vents in the Bransfield Strait, Antarctica. Front. Mar. Sci. 3, 32 ( 10.3389/fmars.2016.00032) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Domack E, Ishman S, Leventer A, Sylva S, Willmott V, Huber B. 2005. A chemotrophic ecosystem found beneath Antarctic ice shelf. EOS 86, 269–276. ( 10.1029/2005EO290001) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Niemann H, et al. 2009. Biogeochemistry of a low-activity cold seep in the Larsen B area, western Weddell Sea, Antarctica. Biogeosciences 6, 2383–2395. ( 10.5194/bg-6-2383-2009) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gutt J, et al. 2011. Biodiversity change after climate-induced ice-shelf collapse in the Antarctic. Deep-Sea Res. Part II 58, 74–83. ( 10.1016/j.dsr2.2010.05.024) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Römer M, et al. 2014. First evidence of widespread methane emissions around a sub-Antarctic island (South Georgia). Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 403, 166–177. ( 10.1016/j.epsl.2014.06.036) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bell JB, Aquilina A, Woulds C, Glover AG, Little CTS, Reid WDK, Hepburn LE, Newton J, Mills RA. 2016. Geochemistry, faunal composition and trophic structure in reducing sediments on the southwest South Georgia margin. R. Soc. open sci. 3, 160284 ( 10.1098/rsos.160284) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sahling H, Wallmann K, Dählmann A, Schmaljohann R, Petersen S. 2005. The physicochemical habitat of Sclerolinum sp. at Hook Ridge hydrothermal vent, Bransfield Strait, Antarctica. Limnol. Oceanogr. 50, 598–606. ( 10.4319/lo.2005.50.2.0598) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Georgieva MN, Wiklund H, Bell JB, Eilertsen MH, Mills RA, Little CTS, Glover AG. 2015. A chemosynthetic weed: the tubeworm Sclerolinum contortum is a bipolar, cosmopolitan species. BMC Evol. Biol. 15, 280 ( 10.1186/s12862-015-0559-y) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Eilertsen ME, Georgieva MN, Kongsrud JA, Linse K, Wiklund H, Glover AG, Rapp HT. 2018. Genetic connectivity from the Arctic to the Antarctic: Sclerolinum contortum and Nicomache lokii (Annelida) are both widespread in reducing environments. Sci. Rep. 8, 4810 ( 10.1038/s41598-018-23076-0) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Johnson SB, Krylova EM, Audzijonyte A, Sahling H, Vrijenhoek RC. 2017. Phylogeny and origins of chemosynthetic vesicomyid clams. Syst. Biodiv. 15, 346–360. ( 10.1080/14772000.2016.1252438) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rogers AD, et al. 2012. The discovery of new deep-sea hydrothermal vent communities in the Southern Ocean and implications for biogeography. PLoS Biol. 10, e1001234 ( 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001234) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hahm D, Baker ET, Rhee TS, Won Y-J, Resing JA, Lupton JE, Lee W-K, Kim M, Park S-H. 2015. First hydrothermal discoveries on the Australian-Antarctic ridge: discharge sites, plume chemistry, and vent organisms. Geochem. Geophy. Geosys. 16, 3061–3075. ( 10.1002/2015GC005926) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hawkes JA, Connelly DP, Rijkenberg MJA, Achterberg EP. 2014. The importance of shallow hydrothermal island arc systems in ocean biogeochemistry. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 942–947. ( 10.1002/2013GL058817) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.James R, et al. 2014. Composition of hydrothermal fluids and mineralogy of associated chimney material on the East Scotia Ridge back-arc spreading centre. Geochi. Cosmochi. Acta 139, 47–71. ( 10.1016/j.gca.2014.04.024) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Thatje S, Marsh L, Roterman CN, Mavrogordato MN, Linse K. 2015. Adaptations to hydrothermal vent life in Kiwa tyleri, a new species of Yeti Crab from the East Scotia Ridge, Antarctica. PLoS ONE 10, e0127621 ( 10.1371/journal.pone.0127621) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Chen C, Linse K, Roterman CN, Copley JT, Rogers AD. 2015. A new genus of large hydrothermal vent-endemic gastropod (Neomphalina: Peltospiridae) with two new species showing evidence of recent demographic expansion. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 175, 319–335. ( 10.1111/zoj.12279) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Linse K, Rotermann CN, Chen C. 2019. A new vent limpet in the genus Lepetodrilus (Gastropoda: Lepetodrilidae) from Southern Ocean hydrothermal vent fields showing high phenotypic plasticity. Front. Mar. Sci. 6, 381 ( 10.3389/fmars.2019.00381) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Buckeridge J, Linse K, Jackson J. 2013. Vulcanolepas scotiaensis sp. nov., a new deep-sea scalpelliform barnacle (Eolepadidae: Neolepadinae) from hydrothermal vents in the Scotia Sea, Antarctica. Zootaxa 3745, 551–568. ( 10.11646/zootaxa.3745.5.4) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mah C, Linse K, Copley JT, Marsh L, Rogers A, Clague D, Foltz D. 2015. Description of a new family, including new genera and species of deep-sea Forcipulatacea (Asteroidea), the first known sea star from hydrothermal vent settings. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 174, 93–113. ( 10.1111/zoj.12229) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Marsh L, Copley J, Huvenne V, Linse K, Reid WDK, Rogers A, Sweeting CJ, Tyler PA. 2012. Microdistribution of faunal assemblages at deep-sea hydrothermal vents in the Southern Ocean. PLoS ONE 7, e48348 ( 10.1371/journal.pone.0048348) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Reid WDK, Sweeting CJ, Wigham BD, Zwirglmaier K, Hawkes JA, McGill RAR, Linse K, Polunin NVC. 2013. Spatial differences in East Scotia Ridge hydrothermal vent food webs: influences of chemistry, microbiology and predation on trophodynamics. PLoS ONE 9, e65553 ( 10.1371/journal.pone.0065553) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zwirglmaier K, et al. 2014. Linking regional variation of epibiotic bacterial diversity and trophic ecology in a new species of Kiwaidae (Decapoda, Anomura) from East Scotia Ridge (Antarctica) hydrothermal vents. Microbiol. Open 4, 136–150. ( 10.1002/mbo3.227) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Heywood J, Chen C, Pearce P, Linse K. 2017. Symbionts composition in the Southern Ocean vent gastropod Gigantopelta chessoia: indication for inter-generational transfer? Polar Biol. 40, 2335–2342. ( 10.1007/s00300-017-2148-6) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Chen C, Uematsu K, Linse K, Sigwart JD. 2017. By more ways than one: rapid convergence in adaptations to hydrothermal vents shown by 3D anatomical reconstruction of Gigantopelta (Mollusca: Neomphalina). BMC Evol. Biol. 17, 62 ( 10.1186/s12862-017-0917-z) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Lee S-H, Lee W-K, Won Y-J. 2016. A new species of yeti crab, genus Kiwa Macpherson, Jones and Segonac, 2005 (Decapoda: Anomura: Kiwaidae), from a hydrothermal vent on the Australian-Antarctic Ridge. J. Crust. Biol. 36, 238–247. ( 10.1163/1937240X-00002418) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Leat PT, Fretwell PT, Tate AJ, Larter RD, Martin TJ, Smellie JL, Jokat W, Bohrmann G. 2016. Bathymetry and geological setting of the South Sandwich Islands volcanic arc. Ant. Sci. 28, 293–303. ( 10.1017/S0954102016000043) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Leat PT, Fretwell PT, Tate AJ, Larter RD, Martin TJ, Smellie JL, Jokat W, Bohrmann G. 2016. (Table 1) Datasets used in the South Sandwich arc bathymetric compilation. PANGAEA ( 10.1594/PANGAEA.868492) (Supplement to Leat et al. 2016a) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Larter RD, Vanneste LE, Morris P, Smyth DK. 2003. Structure and tectonic evolution of the South Sandwich arc. In Intra-oceanic subduction systems: tectonic and magmatic processes, vol. 219 (eds Larter RD, Leat PT), pp. 255–284. Special Publication. London, UK: Geological Society of London. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Leat PT, Day SJ, Tate AJ, Martin TJ, Owen MJ, Tappin DR. 2013. Volcanic evolution of the South Sandwich volcanic arc, South Atlantic, from multibeam bathymetry. J. Volcan. Geotherm. Res. 265, 60–77. ( 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2013.08.013) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Tyler PA.2012. JC055 cruise report www.bodc.ac.uk .
  • 47.Bohrmann G. 2013. The expedition of the research vessel ‘Polarstern’ to the Antarctic in 2013 (ANT-XXIX/4). Rep. Polar Mar. Res. 668, 1–174. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Cole CS, James RH, Connelly DP, Hathorne EC. 2014. Rare earth elements as indicators of hydrothermal processes within the East Scotia subduction zone system. Geochem. Cosmo. Acta 140, 20–38. ( 10.1016/j.gca.2014.05.018) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Trathan PN, Collins MA, Grant SM, Belchier M, Barnes DKA, Brown J, Staniland IJ. 2015. The South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands MPA: Protecting a biodiverse oceanic island chain situated in the flow of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current. In Marine managed areas and fisheries (advances in marine biology), vol. 69 (eds Johnson ML, Sandell J), pp. 15–78. London, UK: Academic Press. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.de Ronde CEJ, Massoth GJ, Baker ET, Lupton JE. 2003. Submarine hydrothermal venting related to volcanic arcs. Soc. Econ. Geol. Spec. Publ. 10, 91–110. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Baker ET, Embley RW, Walker SL, Resing JA, Lupton JE, Nakamura KI, de Ronde CE, Massoth GJ. 2008. Hydrothermal activity and volcano distribution along the Mariana arc. J. Geophys. Res. 113, B08S09, ( 10.1029/2007JB005423) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Emerson D, Moyer CL. 2002. Neutrophilic Fe-oxidizing bacteria are abundant at the Loihi Seamount hydrothermal vents and play a major role in Fe oxide deposition. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68, 3085–3093. ( 10.1128/AEM.68.6.3085-3093.2002) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Staudigel H, et al. 2006. Vailulu'u Seamount, Samoa: life and death on an active submarine volcano. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 6448–6453. ( 10.1073/pnas.0600830103) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Martin JW, Wishner K, Graff JR. 2005. Caridean and sergestid shrimp from the Kick'em Jenny submarine volcano, southeastern Caribbean Sea. Crustaceana 78, 215–221. ( 10.1163/1568540054020631) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Carey S, et al. 2015. Exploring Kick'em Jenny submarine volcano and the Barbados Cold Seep Province, Southern Lesser Antilles. Oceanography 28, 38–39. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Arango CP, Linse K. 2015. New Sericosura (Pycnogonida: Ammotheidae) from deep-sea hydrothermal vents in the Southern Ocean. Zootaxa 3995, 037–050. ( 10.11646/zootaxa.3995.1.5) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Larter R. 2009. Cruise summary report JC042. https://www.bodc.ac.uk/data/information_and_inventories/cruise_inventory/report/9359/.
  • 58.Rogers AD.2010. Cruise report JC042. www.bodc.ac.uk .
  • 59.Marsh L, Copley JT, Huvenne VAI, Tyler PA, the Isis ROV Facility. 2013. Getting the bigger picture: using precision remotely operated vehicle (ROV) videography to acquire high-definition mosaic images of newly discovered hydrothermal vents in the Southern Ocean. Deep-Sea Res Part II 92, 124–135. ( 10.1016/j.dsr2.2013.02.007) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Copley JT, Marsh L, Glover AG, Hühnerbach V, Nye VE, Reid WDK, Sweeting CJ, Wigham BD, Wiklund H. 2016. Ecology and biogeography of megafauna and macrofauna at the first known deep-sea hydrothermal vents on the ultraslow-spreading Southwest Indian Ridge. Sci. Rep. 6, 38158 ( 10.1038/srep39158) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Zhang D, Zhou Y, Wang C, Rouse GW. 2017. A new species of Ophryotrocha (Annelida, Eunicida, Dorvilleidae) from hydrothermal vents on the Southwest Indian Ridge. ZooKeys 687, 1–9. ( 10.3897/zookeys.687.13046) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Chen C, Zhou Y, Wang C, Copley JT. 2018. Two new hot-vent peltospirid snails (Gastropoda: Neomphalina) from Longqi hydrothermal field, Southwest Indian Ridge. Front. Mar. Sci. 4, 392 ( 10.3389/fmars.2017.00392) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Watanabe HK, Chen C, Marie DP, Takai K, Fujikura K, Chan BKK. 2018. Phylogeography of hydrothermal vent stalked barnacles: a new species fills a gap in the Indian Ocean ‘dispersal corridor’ hypothesis. R. Soc. open sci. 5, 172408 ( 10.1098/rsos.172408) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Zhou Y, et al. 2018. Characterization of vent fauna at three hydrothermal vent fields on the Southwest Indian Ridge: implications for biogeography and interannual dynamics on slow-spreading ridges. Deep-Sea Res. Part I 137, 1–12. ( 10.1016/j.dsr.2018.05.001) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Lane DJ. 1991. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In Nucleic acid techniques in bacterial systematics (eds Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M), pp. 115–147. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Stackebrand E, Liesack W. 1993. Nucleic acids and classification. In Handbook of new bacterial systematics (eds Goodfellow M, O'Donnell AG), pp. 152–189. London, UK: Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Baker GC, Smith JJ, Cowan DA. 2003. Review and re-analysis of domain-specific 16S primers. J. Microbiol. Methods 55, 541–555. ( 10.1016/j.mimet.2003.08.009) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Ovreås L, Forney L, Daae FL, Torsvik V. 1997. Distribution of bacterioplankton in meromictic Lake Saelenvannet, as determined by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of PCR-amplified gene fragments coding for 16S rRNA. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63, 3367–3373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Ludwig W, et al. 2004. ARB: a software environment for sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 1363–1371. ( 10.1093/nar/gkh293) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Vaulot D. 1989. CYTOPC: processing software for flow cytometric data. Signal Noise 2, 8. [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Cole JW, Milner DM, Spinks KD. 2005. Calderas and caldera structures: a review. Earth Sci. Rev. 69, 1–26. ( 10.1016/j.earscirev.2004.06.004) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Sato H, Taniguchi H. 1997. Relationship between crater size and ejecta volume of recent magmatic and phreato-magmatic eruption: implications for energy partitioning. Geophys. Res. Lett. 24, 205–208. ( 10.1029/96GL04004) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Valentine GA, White JDL, Ross P-S, Amin J, Taddeucci J, Sonder I, Johnson PJ. 2012. Experimental craters formed by single and multiple buried explosions and implications for volcanic craters with emphasis on maars. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L20301 ( 10.1029/2012GL053716) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Leat PT, Tate AJ, Tappin DR, Day SJ, Owen MJ. 2010. Growth and mass wasting of volcanic centers in the northern South Sandwich arc, South Atlantic, revealed by new multibeam mapping. Mar. Geol. 275, 110–126. ( 10.1016/j.margeo.2010.05.001) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Whitworth T III, Nowlin WD Jr, Orsi AH, Locarnini RA, Smith SG. 1994. Weddell sea shelf water in the Bransfield Strait and Weddell-Scotia Confluence. Deep-Sea Res. Part I 41, 629–641. ( 10.1016/0967-0637(94)90046-9) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Naveira-Garabato AC, Heywood KJ, Stevens DP. 2002. Modification and pathways of Southern Ocean deep waters in the Scotia Sea. Deep-Sea Res. Part II 49, 681–705. ( 10.1016/S0967-0637(01)00071-1) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Naveira-Garabato AC, McDonagh EL, Stevens DP, Heywood KJ, Sanders RJ. 2002. Modification and pathways of Southern Ocean deep waters in the Scotia Sea. Deep Sea Res. Part II 49, 4715–4742. ( 10.1016/S0967-0645(02)00156-X) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Amon DJ, Glover AG, Wiklund H, Marsh L, Linse K, Rogers AD, Copley JT. 2013. The discovery of a natural whale fall in the Antarctic deep sea. Deep-Sea Res. Part II 92, 87–96. ( 10.1016/j.dsr2.2013.01.028) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Oliver PG, Rodrigues CF. 2017. Thyasiridae (Mollusca: Bivalvia) from the Kemp Caldera hydrohermal site, South Sandwich Islands, Antarctica. J. Conchol. 42, 267–282. [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Roterman CN, Copley JT, Linse K, Tyler PA, Rogers AD. 2016. Connectivity in the cold: the comparative population genetics of vent-endemic fauna in the Scotia Sea, Southern Ocean. Mol. Ecol. 25, 1073–1088. ( 10.1111/mec.13541) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Ardila NE, Harasewych MG. 2005. Cocculinid and pseudococculinid limpets (Gastropoda: Cocculiniformia) from off the Caribbean coast of Columbia. Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington 118, 344–366. ( 10.2988/0006-324X(2005)118[344:CAPLGC]2.0.CO;2) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.McLean JH, Harasewych MG. 1995. Review of the Western Atlantic species of cocculinid and pseudococculinid limpets with descriptions of new species (Gastropoda: Cocculiniformia). Contr. Sci. Nat. Hist. Mus. LA County 453, 1–32. [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Boschen RE, Tyler PA, Copley JT. 2013. Distribution, population structure, reproduction and diet of Ophiolimna antarctica (Lyman, 1879) from Kemp Caldera in the Southern Ocean. Deep-Sea Res. Part II 92, 27–35. ( 10.1016/j.dsr2.2013.02.005) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.de Ronde CEJ, Chadwick WW Jr, Ditchburn RG, Embley RW, Tunnicliffe V, Baker ET, Walker SL, Ferrini VL, Merle SM. 2015. Molten sulfur lakes of intraoceanic arc volcanoes. In Volcanic lakes: advances in volcanology (eds Rouwet D, Christenson B, Tassi F, Vandemeulebrouck J), pp. 261–288. Berlin, Germany: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Chen C, Linse K. 2019. A new trochoidean gastropod (Vetigastropoda: Skeneidae) discovered from deep-sea hydrothermal vents in the Southern Ocean. Mar. Biodiv. ( 10.1007/s12526-019-01005-2) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Linse K, Nye V, Copley J, Chen C. 2019. On the systematics and ecology of two new species of Provanna (Abyssochrysoidea: Provannidae) from deep-sea hydrothermal vents in the Caribbean Sea and Southern Ocean. J. Moll. Stud. ( 10.1093/mollus/eyz024) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Glaubitz S, Kießlich K, Meeske C, Labrenz M, Jürgens K. 2013. SUP05 dominates the Gammaproteobacterial sulfur oxidizer assemblages in pelagic redoxclines of the central Baltic and Black Seas. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79, 2767–2776. ( 10.1128/AEM.03777-12) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Mattes TE, Nunn BL, Marshall KT, Proskurowski G, Kelley DS, Kawka OE et al. 2013. Sulfur oxidizers dominate carbon fixation at a biogeochemical hot spot in the dark ocean. ISME J. 7, 2349–2360. ( 10.1038/ismej.2013.113) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Shah V, Chang BX, Morris RM. 2017. Cultivation of a chemoautotroph from the SUP05 clade of marine bacteria that produces nitrite and consumes ammonium. ISME J. 11, 263–271. ( 10.1038/ismej.2016.87) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Marsh L, Copley JT, Tyler PA, Thatje S. 2015. In hot and cold water: differential life-history traits are key to success in contrasting thermal deep-sea environments. J. Anim. Ecol. 84, 898–913. ( 10.1111/1365-2656.12337) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Thatje S, Smith KE, Marsh L, Tyler PA. 2015. Evidence for abbreviated and lecithotrophic larval development in the yeti crab Kiwa tyleri from hydrothermal vents of the East Scotia Ridge, Southern Ocean. Sex Early Devel Aquat. Org. 1, 109–116. ( 10.3354/sedao00011) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Johnson SB, Waren A, Vrijenhoek RC. 2008. DNA barcoding of Lepetodrilus limpets reveals cryptic species. J. Shellfish Res. 27, 43–51. ( 10.2983/0730-8000(2008)27[43:DBOLLR]2.0.CO;2) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Ingels J, Aronson RB, Smith CR. 2018. The scientific response to Antarctic ice-shelf loss. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 848–851. ( 10.1038/s41558-018-0290-y) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Amon DJ, Wiklund H, Dahlgren TG, Copley JT, Smith CR, Jamieson AJ, Glover AG. 2014. Molecular taxonomy of Osedax (Annelida: Siboglinidae) in the Southern Ocean. Zool. Scr. 43, 405–441.7 ( 10.1111/zsc.12057) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Linse K, Jackson J, Malyutina M, Brandt A. 2014. Herbivorous Northern Hemisphere Jaera (Crustacea, Isopoda, Janiridae) found on whale bones in the Southern Ocean deep sea: description of Jaera tyleri sp. nov. PLoS ONE 9, e93018 ( 10.1371/journal.pone.0093018) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Brandt A, et al. 2007. The Southern Ocean deep sea: first insights into biodiversity and biogeography. Nature 447, 307–311. ( 10.1038/nature05827) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.De Broyer C, et al. 2014. Biogeographic atlas of the Southern Ocean. XII+498 pp Cambridge, UK: Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research. [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Saiz-Salinas JI, Ramos A, Garcia FJ, Troncoso JS, San Martin G, Sanz C, Palaci C. 1997. Quantitative analysis of macrobenthic softbottom assemblages in South Shetland waters (Antarctica). Polar Biol. 17, 393–400. ( 10.1007/PL00013382) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Linse K, et al. 2007. Macro- and megabenthic communities in the abyssal Weddell Sea (Southern Ocean). Deep-Sea Res. Part II 54, 1848–1863. ( 10.1016/j.dsr2.2007.07.011) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Griffiths HJ, Linse K, Barnes DKA. 2008. Distribution of macrobenthic taxa across the Scotia Arc, Antarctica. Ant. Sci. 20, 213–226. ( 10.1017/S0954102008001168) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Linse K, et al. 2013. The macro- and megabenthic fauna on the continental shelf of the eastern Amundsen Sea, Antarctica. Cont. Shelf Res. 68, 80–90. ( 10.1016/j.csr.2013.08.012) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.López-González PJ, Williams GC. 2011. A new deep-sea pennatulacean (Anthozoa: Octocorallia: Chunellidae) from the Porcupine Abyssal Plain (NE Atlantic). Helgoland Mar. Res. 65, 309–318. ( 10.1007/s10152-010-0224-1) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Diaz A, Feral J-P, David B, Saucede T, Poulin E. 2011. Evolutionary pathways among shallow and deep-sea echinoids of the genus Sterechinus in the Southern Ocean. Deep-Sea Res. Part II 58, 205–211. ( 10.1016/j.dsr2.2010.10.012) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Nye V, Copley J, Linse K. 2013. A new species of Eualus Thallwitz, 1891 and new record of Lebbeus antarcticus (Hale, 1941) (Crustacea: Decapoda: Caridea: Hippolytidae) from the Scotia Sea. Deep-Sea Res. Part II 92, 145–156. ( 10.1016/j.dsr2.2013.01.022) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Vacelet J, Fiala-Medioni A, Fisher CR, Boury-Esnault N. 1996. Symbiosis between methane-oxidising bacteria and a deep-sea carnivorous cladorhizid sponge. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 145, 77–85. ( 10.3354/meps145077) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Thurber AR, Kröger K, Neira C, Wiklund H, Levin LA. 2010. Stable isotope signatures and methane use by New Zealand cold seep benthos. Mar. Geol. 272, 260–269. ( 10.1016/j.margeo.2009.06.001) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Yamanaka T, Shimamura S, Nagashio H, Yamagami S, Onishi Y, Hyodo A, Mampuku M, Mizota C. 2015. A compilation of the stable isotopic compositions of carbon, nitrogen and sulphur in soft body parts of animals collected from deep-sea hydrothermal vent and methane seep fields: variations in energy source and importance of subsurface microbial processes in the sediment-hosted systems. In Subseafloor biosphere linked to hydrothermal systems (eds Ishibashi J, Okino K, Sunamura M). Tokyo, Japan: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Goffredi SK, et al. 2017. Hydrothermal vent fields discovered in the southern Gulf of California clarify role of habitat in augmenting regional diversity. Proc. Biol. Sci. 284, pii: 20170817 ( 10.1098/rspb.2017.0817) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Rau GH. 1981. Hydrothermal vent clam and tube worm 13C/12C: further evidence of nonphotosynthetic food sources. Science 213, 338–340. ( 10.1126/science.213.4505.338) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Robinson JJ, Scott KM, Swanson ST, O'Leary MH, Horken K, Tabita FR, Cavanaugh CM. 2003. Kinetic isotope effect and characterisation of form II RubisCO from chemoautotrophic endoysmbionts of the hydrothermal vent tubeworm Riftia pachyptila. Limnol. Oceanogr. 48, 48–54. ( 10.4319/lo.2003.48.1.0048) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Van Dover CL, Fry B. 1994. Microorganisms as food resources at deep-sea hydrothermal vents. Limnol. Oceanogr. 39, 51–57. ( 10.4319/lo.1994.39.1.0051) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Reid WDK, Wigham BD, McGill RAR, Polunin NVC. 2012. Elucidating trophic pathways in benthic deep-sea assemblages of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge north and south of the Charlie-Gibbs Fracture Zone. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 463, 89–103. ( 10.3354/meps09863) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Hugler M, Sievert SM. 2011. Beyond the Calvin Cycle: autotrophic carbon fixation in the ocean. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 3, 261–289. ( 10.1146/annurev-marine-120709-142712) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Suzuki Y, Suzuki M, Tsuchia S, Takai K, Horikoshi K, Southward AJ, Newman WA, Yamaguchi T. 2009. Molecular investigations of the stalked barnacle Vulcanolepas osheai and the epibiotic bacteria from the Brothers Caldera, Kermadec Arc, New Zealand. JMBA 89, 727–733. ( 10.1017/s0025315409000459) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Limen H, Juniper SK. 2006. Habitat controls on vent food webs at Eifuku Volcano, Marina Arc. Cah. Biol. Mar. 47, 449–455. [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Phillips BT. 2017. Beyond the vent: new perspectives on hydrothermal plumes and pelagic biology. Deep-Sea Res. Part II 137, 480–485. ( 10.1016/j.dsr2.2016.10.005) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Winn CD, Karl DM, Massoth GJ. 1986. Microorganisms in deep-sea hydrothermal plumes. Nature 320, 774–776. ( 10.1038/320744a0) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Maruyama A, Urabe T, Ishibashi J. 1998. Global hydrothermal primary production rate estimated from the southern East Pacific Rise. In: Proc. of the First Int. Symp. on Deep-Sea Hydrothermal Vent Biology: Funchal, Madeira, Portugal 20–24 October 1997. Cah. Biol Mar 39, 249–252. [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Dick GJ, Tebo BM. 2010. Microbial diversity and biogeochemistry of the Guaymas Basin deep-sea hydrothermal plume. Environ. Microbiol. 12, 1334–1347. ( 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02177.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Djurhius A, Boersch-Supan PH, Mikalsen S-O, Rogers AD. 2017. Microbe biogeography tracks water masses in a dynamic oceanic frontal system. R. Soc. open sci. 4, 170033 ( 10.1098/rsos.170033) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Burd BJ, Thomson RE, Jamieson GS. 1992. Composition of a deep scattering layer overlying a mid-ocean ridge hydrothermal plume. Mar. Biol. 113, 517–526. ( 10.1007/BF00349179) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Burd BJ, Thomson RE. 1994. Hydrothermal venting at Endeavour Ridge: effect on zooplankton biomass throughout the water column. Deep-Sea Res. Part I 40, 1407–1423. ( 10.1016/0967-0637(94)90105-8) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Burd BJ, Thomson RE. 1995. Distribution of zooplankton associated with the Endeavour Ridge hydrothermal plume. J. Plankton. Res. 17, 965–997. ( 10.1093/plankt/17.5.965) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Burd BJ, Thomson RE. 2012. Estimating zooplankton biomass distribution in the water column near the Endeavour Segment of Juan de Fuca Ridge using acoustic backscatter and concurrently towed nets. Oceanography 25, 269–276. ( 10.5670/oceanog.2012.25) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Burd BJ, Thomson RE. 2015. The importance of hydrothermal venting to water-column secondary production in the northeast Pacific. Deep-Sea Res. Part II 121, 85–94. ( 10.1016/j.dsr2.2015.04.014) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Burd BJ, Thomson RE, Calvert SE. 2002. Isotopic composition of hydrothermal epiplume zooplankton: evidence of enhanced carbon recycling in the water column. Deep-Sea Res. Part I 49, 1877–1900. ( 10.1016/S0967-0637(02)00089-4) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Lindsay D, Umetsu M, Grossmann M, Miyake H, Yamamoto H. 2015. The gelatinous macroplankton community at the Hatoma Knoll hydrothermal vent. In Subseafloor biosphere linked to hydrothermal systems (eds Ishibashi J-I, Okino K, Sunamura M), pp. 639–666. Tokyo, Japan: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Phillips BT, Dunbabin M, Henning B, Howell C, DeCiccio A, Flinders A, Grinham A. 2016. Exploring the ‘Sharkcano’: biogeochemical observations of the Kavachi submarine volcano (Solomon Islands). Oceanography 29, 160–169. ( 10.5670/oceanog.2016.85) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Wilcock WSD, Hooft EEE, Toomey DR, McGill PR, Barclay AH, Stakes DS, Ramirez TM. 2009. The role of magma injection in localizing black smoker activity. Nat. Geosci. 2, 509–513. ( 10.1038/ngeo550) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Soule DC, Wilcock WS. 2013. Fin whale tracks recorded by a seismic network on the Juan de Fuca Ridge, Northeast Pacific Ocean. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 133, 1751–1761. ( 10.1121/1.4774275) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Mullineaux LS, Wiebe PH, Baker ET. 1995. Larvae of benthic invertebrates in hydrothermal vent plumes over Juan de Fuca Ridge. Mar. Biol. 122, 585–596. ( 10.1007/BF00350680) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Kim SL, Mullineaux LS, Helfrich KR. 1994. Larval dispersal via entrainment into hydrothermal vent plumes. JGR Oceans 99, 12655 ( 10.1029/94JC00644) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Smith CR, Amon DJ, Higgs ND, Glover AG, Young EL. 2017. Data are inadequate to test whale falls as chemosynthetic stepping-stones using network analysis: faunal overlaps do support a stepping-stone role. Proc. R. Soc. B 284, 1863 ( 10.1098/rspb.2017.1281) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table S1
rsos191501supp1.docx (3.8MB, docx)
Reviewer comments
Table S2
rsos191501supp2.docx (3.3MB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

Our genetic data are deposited at GenBank accessions numbers MK736312–MK736351. The datasets supporting this article have been uploaded as part of the electronic supplementary material.


Articles from Royal Society Open Science are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES