Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2019 Dec 5;8(49):e01364-19. doi: 10.1128/MRA.01364-19

Draft Genome Sequence of Enterobacter hormaechei ENT5, a Component of the Symbiotic Community of Tephritid Flies

Elias Asimakis a, Vangelis Doudoumis a, Georgia Gouvi a, George Tsiamis a,
Editor: Julie C Dunning Hotoppb
PMCID: PMC6895312  PMID: 31806752

Enterobacter strains are among the dominant symbiotic bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract of insects, with the ability to fulfill diverse roles. In this announcement, we describe the draft genome sequence of Enterobacter hormaechei strain ENT5, isolated from wild adult Zeugodacus cucurbitae flies.

ABSTRACT

Enterobacter strains are among the dominant symbiotic bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract of insects, with the ability to fulfill diverse roles. In this announcement, we describe the draft genome sequence of Enterobacter hormaechei strain ENT5, isolated from wild adult Zeugodacus cucurbitae flies.

ANNOUNCEMENT

Symbiotic bacterial communities associated with insects are continuously drawing attention as a means to improve environmentally friendly techniques, such as the sterile insect technique (SIT), for the effective control of insect pest populations (1). Many fruit flies, members of the family Tephritidae, are good examples of persistent, destructive agricultural pests with the ability to affect a variety of cultivated plants worldwide (25).

Enterobacter spp. are Gram-negative, rod-shaped, facultatively anaerobic bacteria that are components of the gastrointestinal symbiotic communities of insects (69) and are responsible for the provision of nutrients (10, 11), pathogen transmission (12), communication (13), and interactions with the host plant (14). Another interesting aspect of this association is the probiotic effect that many Enterobacter strains exhibit, which results in the enhancement of important biological parameters of many mass-reared fly species, including Zeugodacus cucurbitae (1517).

In this article, we report the draft genome sequence of Enterobacter hormaechei ENT5, isolated from wild Z. cucurbitae flies that were collected in Mauritius in 2014. Flies were surface sterilized with 70% ethanol and washed with a sterile 1% phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution. Three male and three female adult flies were pooled and homogenized in the sterile 1% PBS solution. The homogenate was serially diluted, and 100 μl was plated on Luria-Bertani (LB) medium (1% [wt/vol] peptone, 1% [wt/vol] NaCl, 0.5% [wt/vol] yeast extract, and 1.5% [wt/vol] agar) and incubated at 25°C under aerobic conditions. The E. hormaechei strain was identified among the isolates, and its genomic DNA was extracted from a single colony using lysis buffer containing lysozyme, according to Haught et al. (18). The DNA was sent to MicrobesNG (Birmingham, UK) for whole-genome sequencing. DNA was quantified using the Quant-iT double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) high-sensitivity (HS) assay (Invitrogen) in an Eppendorf AF2200 plate reader. A genomic DNA library was prepared using the Nextera XT library prep kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), following the manufacturer’s protocol. The library was quantified using the Kapa Biosystems library quantification kit for Illumina on a Roche LightCycler 96 quantitative PCR (qPCR) machine and sequenced with 75-fold coverage on the Illumina HiSeq 2500 using a 250-bp paired-end protocol, producing 1,243,783 reads. Reads were trimmed using Trimmomatic v.0.3, with a sliding window quality cutoff of Q15 (19), and their quality was assessed using FastQC 0.11 (20). Default program parameters were used. Reads were de novo assembled into 446 contigs using SPAdes 3.7 (21). The quality of the assembly was evaluated with QUAST 5.0.2 (22). Taxonomic assignment of reads was performed with Kraken 2.0.7 (23), and genome annotation was performed using Prokka 1.11 (24). Protein function was predicted by performing sequence similarity queries against UniProtKB (25).

The assembled draft genome was 4,774,740 bp long, with a GC content of 55.93%. The N50 was 201,158 bp, the L50 was 8, and the largest contig was 675,820 bp long. Almost half of the reads (41.4%) were classified within the genus Enterobacter, while 42.92% remained unclassified, and the reads showed 98.9% similarity based on average nucleotide identity (ANI) to those of the type genome of Enterobacter hormaechei. The draft genome contained 4,344 protein-coding sequences, 968 of which were identified as hypothetical proteins. Sequences coding for 81 tRNA genes, 8 5S rRNA genes, and 1 16S rRNA gene were also identified. Genome annotation revealed the genes nfsA and nfsB, which code for oxygen-insensitive NAD(P)H nitroreductases responsible for nitrogen fixation.

Data availability.

The whole-genome shotgun project of E. hormaechei ENT5 has been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession number VTSZ00000000, BioProject number PRJNA562639, and BioSample number SAMN12646888. Raw sequencing reads were deposited to the Sequence Read Archive under accession number SRR10028728. The version described in this paper is version VTSZ01000000.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This work was cofunded by Greece and the European Union in the framework of the action titled “Supporting researchers with an emphasis on young researchers” of the operational program “Development of human resources, education and lifelong learning” (code CCI2014GR059OP001) of the National Strategic Reference Framework (NSRF) 2014–2020.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Bourtzis K, Lees RS, Hendrichs J, Vreysen M. 2016. More than one rabbit out of the hat: radiation, transgenic and symbiont-based approaches for sustainable management of mosquito and tsetse fly populations. Acta Trop 157:115–130. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2016.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Aluja M, Norrbom A. 1999. Fruit flies (Tephritidae): phylogeny and evolution of behavior. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Christenson LD, Foote RH. 1960. Biology of fruit flies. Annu Rev Entomol 5:171–192. doi: 10.1146/annurev.en.05.010160.001131. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.White IM, Elson-Harris MM. 1992. Fruit flies of economic significance: their identification and bionomics. CAB International, Wallingford, United Kingdom. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Aluja M, Liedo P. 1993. Fruit flies: biology and management. Springer, New York, NY. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wang A, Yao Z, Zheng W, Zhang H. 2014. Bacterial communities in the gut and reproductive organs of Bactrocera minax (Diptera: Tephritidae) based on 454 pyrosequencing. PLoS One 9:e106988. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wang H, Jin L, Peng T, Zhang H, Chen Q, Hua Y. 2014. Identification of cultivable bacteria in the intestinal tract of Bactrocera dorsalis from three different populations and determination of their attractive potential. Pest Manag Sci 70:80–87. doi: 10.1002/ps.3528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gujjar NR, Govindan S, Verghese A, Subramaniam S, More R. 2017. Diversity of the cultivable gut bacterial communities associated with the fruit flies Bactrocera dorsalis and Bactrocera cucurbitae (Diptera: Tephritidae). Phytoparasitica 45:453–460. doi: 10.1007/s12600-017-0604-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Geiger A, Fardeau M-L, Grebaut P, Vatunga G, Josénando T, Herder S, Cuny G, Truc P, Ollivier B. 2009. First isolation of Enterobacter, Enterococcus, and Acinetobacter spp. as inhabitants of the tsetse fly (Glossina palpalis palpalis) midgut. Infect Genet Evol 9:1364–1370. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2009.09.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Potrikus CJ, Breznak JA. 1977. Nitrogen-fixing Enterobacter agglomerans isolated from guts of wood-eating termites. Appl Environ Microbiol 33:392–399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zhou H, Guo W, Xu B, Teng Z, Tao D, Lou Y, Gao Y. 2017. Screening and identification of lignin-degrading bacteria in termite gut and the construction of LiP-expressing recombinant Lactococcus lactis. Microb Pathog 112:63–69. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2017.09.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cirimotich CM, Dong Y, Clayton AM, Sandiford SL, Souza-Neto JA, Mulenga M, Dimopoulos G. 2011. Natural microbe-mediated refractoriness to Plasmodium infection in Anopheles gambiae. Science 332:855–858. doi: 10.1126/science.1201618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Woodbury N, Gries G. 2013. Firebrats, Thermobia domestica, aggregate in response to the microbes Enterobacter cloacae and Mycotypha microspora. Entomol Exp Appl 147:154–159. doi: 10.1111/eea.12054. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chung SH, Rosa C, Scully ED, Peiffer M, Tooker JF, Hoover K, Luthe DS, Felton GW. 2013. Herbivore exploits orally secreted bacteria to suppress plant defenses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:15728–15733. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1308867110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Augustinos AA, Kyritsis GA, Papadopoulos NT, Abd-Alla AMM, Cáceres C, Bourtzis K. 2015. Exploitation of the medfly gut microbiota for the enhancement of sterile insect technique: use of Enterobacter sp. in larval diet-based probiotic applications. PLoS One 10:e0136459. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kyritsis GA, Augustinos AA, Cáceres C, Bourtzis K. 2017. Medfly gut microbiota and enhancement of the sterile insect technique: similarities and differences of Klebsiella oxytoca and Enterobacter sp. AA26 probiotics during the larval and adult stages of the VIENNA 8D53+ genetic sexing strain. Front Microbiol 8:2064. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yao M, Zhang H, Cai P, Gu X, Wang D, Ji Q. 2017. Enhanced fitness of a Bactrocera cucurbitae genetic sexing strain based on the addition of gut-isolated probiotics (Enterobacter spec.) to the larval diet. Entomol Exp Appl 162:197–203. doi: 10.1111/eea.12529. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Haught C, Wilkinson DL, Zgafas K, Harrison RG. 1994. A method to insert a DNA fragment into a double-stranded plasmid. Biotechniques 16:46–48. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Andrews S. 2010. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/.
  • 21.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wood DE, Salzberg SL. 2014. Kraken: ultrafast metagenomic sequence classification using exact alignments. Genome Biol 15:R46. doi: 10.1186/gb-2014-15-3-r46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Seemann T. 2014. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30:2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.The UniProt Consortium. 2019. UniProt: a worldwide hub of protein knowledge. Nucleic Acids Res 47:D506–D515. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The whole-genome shotgun project of E. hormaechei ENT5 has been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession number VTSZ00000000, BioProject number PRJNA562639, and BioSample number SAMN12646888. Raw sequencing reads were deposited to the Sequence Read Archive under accession number SRR10028728. The version described in this paper is version VTSZ01000000.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES