Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 27.
Published in final edited form as: Nature. 2019 Nov 27;576(7785):158–162. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1778-y

Figure 3 ∣. Focal accumulation of cohesin is delayed compared to CTCF and coincides with structural loop formation.

Figure 3 ∣

a, Venn diagrams showing CTCF and Rad21 peak distribution across cell cycle stages. b, Box plots showing the recovery rate of CTCF (n=33,306) and Rad21 (n=18,859) peaks. Peaks absent from late G1 were dropped from the analysis. For all box plots, center lines denote medians; box limits denote 25-75 percentile; whiskers denote 5-95 percentile. P values were calculated from two-sided Mann-Whitney U test. c, Genome browser tracks of CTCF and Rad21 at the Lonrf2 loci across cell cycle stages. n=2-3 biological replicates. Blue and yellow arrows indicate IM- and IO-CTCF binding sites, respectively. d, Schematic depicting classification of loops. All loops with CTCF/cohesin co-occupancy at both anchors were sub-divided into those with 0, 1, or 2 anchors marked by cis-regulatory elements. Those with 0 or 1 were operationally defined as structural loops. e, Heatmap showing result of k-means clustering on the 4,712 structural loops. f, Hi-C contact maps showing a representative region that contains a cluster 1 structural loop (chr2:167.4Mb-167.9Mb, black arrows), along with genome browser tracks of CTCF and Rad21 ChIP-seq profiles. Rad21 peaks at two loop anchors are indicated by red arrowheads. Chevron arrows highlight positions and orientations of CTCF sites at the loop anchors. Bin size: 10kb. g, Capture-C interaction profile of the same region as shown in (f). n=3 biological replicates. Anchor symbol shows position of the capture probe. h-i, similar to (f-g) showing a representative region that contains a cluster 3 (slowly emerging) structural loop (chr1:50.6Mb-52.0Mb, black arrows).