Skip to main content
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention : APJCP logoLink to Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention : APJCP
. 2019;20(2):327–332. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.2.327

Protective Effect of Omega-3 Fatty Acids in Fish Consumption Against Breast Cancer in Asian Patients: A Meta-Analysis

Ricvan Dana Nindrea 1,2,*, Teguh Aryandono 3, Lutfan Lazuardi 4, Iwan Dwiprahasto 5
PMCID: PMC6897018  PMID: 30803190

Abstract

Objective:

This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to determine the protective effect of omega-3 fatty acids in fish consumption against breast cancer in Asian patients.

Methods:

The authors conducted a meta-analysis of published research articles on protective effect of omega-3 fatty acids in fish consumption against breast cancer in Asian patients published between January 2000 and July 2018 in online database of PubMed, ProQuest and EBSCO. Pooled odds ratios (OR) were calculated by using fixed and random-effect models. Publication bias was visually evaluated by using funnel plots and statistically assessed in Egger’s and Begg’s tests. Data were processed by Review Manager 5.3 (RevMan 5.3) and Stata version 14.2 (Stata Corporation).

Results:

This study reviewed 913 articles. There were 11 studies which conducted systematic review then continued by meta-analysis of relevant data with total number of samples were 130,365 patients. The results showed there was protective effect of omega-3 fatty acids in fish consumption against breast cancer in Asian patients (OR = 0.80 [95% CI 0.73-0.87, p <0.00001]). There was not any study with significant publication bias included.

Conclusion:

This analysis confirmed the protective effect of omega-3 fatty acids in fish consumption against breast cancer in Asian patients.

Key Words: Breast neoplasms, fatty acids, omega-3, fish consumption

Introduction

Breast cancer is a major health concern in the world as it is one of the most common malignancies found worldwide. Although Asian countries has lower incidence rate than Europe and United States, the death rate of breast cancer in Asia is considerable (Jemal et al., 2011). This kind of neoplasm has multifactorial etiology. The breast cancer risk factors are divided into nonmodifiable and modifiable risk factors (Nindrea et al., 2017; Nindrea et al., 2018). In the past few decades, epidemiological studies have suggested that healthy diet and lifestyle are essential to prevent breast cancer (Lambrechts et al., 2011; Gao et al., 2013). One of the dietary factors associated with breast cancer risk is low intake of fish (Nindrea et al., 2017).

The low intake of fish is associated with higher breast cancer risk. Some studies have suggested that omega-3 fatty acids in fish consumption is beneficial for breast cancer prevention and survivorship. Fish fatty acid is commonly referred to longer chain omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) (Kim et al., 2009; Fabian et al., 2015). However, due to wide geographical variation, the demography of breast cancer patients in developing countries differs from those in developed countries. The changes in dietary pattern and lifestyle due to globalization and economic improvement, as well as the availability of breast cancer screening programme might affect the breast cancer risk of the people.

A study by Zheng et al., (2013) firstly found that fish consumption is associated with lower risk of breast cancer. High intake of fatty fish is significantly associated with lower breast cancer risk (Gao et al., 2014). However, some subsequent studies of fish consumption and breast cancer led to contradictory conclusions (Stripp et al., 2003; Holmes et al., 2003; Engeset et al., 2006). So, in fact, the research findings seem to be inconsistent. The different results possibly happened due to different dietary pattern of fish in Asian population and Western population, whom the latter has lower intake, which may impact the significance of the results.

Through measurement of breast cancer risk, it can be classified whether a person has a safe risk to breast cancer, being adequate for breast cancer prevention or harmful to the occurrence of breast cancer (Nindrea et al., 2018). Therefore, this study aims to determine the protective effect of omega-3 fatty acids in fish consumption against breast cancer in Asian patients through meta-analysis study, so that the conclusion drawn from studies on omega-3 fatty acids in fish consumption and breast cancer association will have stronger strength of recommendation.

Materials and Methods

Study design and research sample

This study was a quantitative research with meta-analysis study design. The meta-analysis of the study followed PRISMA Statement to prefer reporting items (Liberati et al., 2009). Meta-analysis was performed to examine protective effect of omega-3 fatty acids in fish consumption against breast cancer in Asian patients. The research samples were published research articles published between January 2000 and July 2018 in online database of PubMed, ProQuest and EBSCO.

Operational definitions

The variables of this study included omega-3 fatty acids in fish consumption as independent variable and breast cancer as dependent variable.

Research procedure

This research was conducted through data collection to identify published research articles on protective effect of omega-3 fatty acids in fish consumption against breast cancer in Asian patients in online database of PubMed, ProQuest and EBSCO (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Flow Diagram Research Procedure

Identification process of 913 articles was held by identifying the title of the articles, continued by reviewing the abstract, and then the full-text of the articles. An article must be excluded if: (a) unrelevant to subject outcome, (b) the methods was not case control and cohort study (c) the information provided in the results was insufficient for data extraction.

Data collection technique

The data collection was performed by online searching. The online searching was limited to English language articles. The article type was limited to journal articles. The research subject was limited to research with human subject. The time of publication was limited from January 2000 to July 2018. The abstract of articles with potentially relevant title were reviewed, while the articles with irrelevant title were excluded. Furthermore, articles that have potentially relevant abstract were continue to be reviewed in full-text, while the articles with irrelevant abstract were excluded. The inclusion criteria of this study sample was research on protective effect of omega-3 fatty acids in fish consumption against breast cancer in Asian patients with case control or cohort study methods. Exclusion criteria were (1) the article was not available in full-text and (2) the inclusion criteria were not satisfyingly fulfilled or the information provided in the article was insufficient for data extraction. The following data were obtained from each article: first name of authors and year of publication, region, type of study, number of sample, pre or postmenopause status of the sample, fish consumption and dietary assessment.

Two independent investigators carefully extracted information from all studies that fulfilled the inclusion criteria in accordance with a standardized protocol. Disagreements were resolved by three other investigators. Quality assessment was conducted by using Newcastle–Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS). The papers with a total score of 0-3, 4-6, and 7-9 points were classified as the poor, moderate, and high quality (Wells et al., 2009).

Data analysis

The analysis was performed to obtain the value of log odds ratio as the combined odds ratio value from the research. Results were pooled using odds ratio with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Significant heterogeneity was indicated by I2>50% because these tests presented minimal statistical power on cases with few studies and small sample sizes. A random effect model was used when significant heterogeneity was observed; otherwise, a fixed effect model was used. Publication bias was visually evaluated by using funnel plots and statistically assessed through Egger’s and Begg’s tests. Meta-analysis was carried out in Stata version 14.2 (Stata Corporation). A two-tailed P-value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results

The selection of articles was conducted to obtain 11 studies with total samples of 130,365 patients related to protective effect of omega-3 fatty acids in fish consumption against breast cancer in Asian patients (Table 1).

Table 1.

Systematic Review Dietary Omega-3 Fatty Acids in Fish Consumption Protective Againts Breast Cancer Patients in Asia

First author, year Region Type of study Number of sample Pre-or-Post menopause Fish consumption Dietary assesment Effect size NOS
Cases Controls
Yaw et al., 2014 Malaysia Cohort 368 368 Post
menopause
3.21 gr/day Food frequency questionnaire RR (95% CI):
0.81(0.68-0.97)
7
Sangrajrang et al., 2013 Thailand Case control 1,130 1,142 Both >340 gr/ week vs < 76 gr/ week Food frequency questionnaire OR (95% CI):
0.9(0.65-1.23)
8
Murff et al., 2011 China Cohort 712 71,859 Both 51.1 gr/ day vs 50.0 gr/ day Food frequency questionnaire RR (95% CI):
0.95(0.75-1.20)
8
Zhang et al., 2009 China Case control 438 438 Both 87.85 gr/ day vs 18.62 gr/ day Food frequency questionnaire OR (95% CI):
0.56(0.37-0.85)
7
Kim et al., 2009 South Korea Case control 360 358 Both 24.1 gr/ day vs 21.8 gr/day Food frequency questionnaire OR (95% CI):
0.62(0.41-0.93)
7
Kuriki et al., 2007 Japan Case control 103 309 Both 22.2 gr/ 1,000 kcal vs 20.3 gr/ 1,000 kcal Food frequency questionnaire OR (95% CI):
0.59(0.31-1.12)
7
Shannon et al., 2005 China Case control 378 1,070 Both ≥ 4.3 gr/ week vs < 1.3 gr/ week Food frequency questionnaire OR (95% CI):
1.36(0.85-2.18)
7
Gago-Dominguez et al., 2003 Singapore Cohort 314 314 Both 80.5 gr/ day vs 24.5 gr/ week Food frequency questionnaire RR (95% CI):
0.74(0.59-0.94)
7
Hirose et al., 2003 Japan Case control 2,385 19,013 Both 3–4 times/week vs < 1–3 times/ week Food frequency questionnaire OR (95% CI):
0.95(0.71-1.28)
8
Wakai et al., 2005 Japan Cohort 13,145 13,146 Both ≥ 0.63% of energy vs < 0.29% of energy Food frequency questionnaire RR (95% CI):
0.50(0.25-1.00)
8
Dai et al., 2002 China Case control 1,459 1,556 Both 12.4 gr/day vs 9.7 gr/ day Food frequency questionnaire OR (95% CI):
0.68(0.54-0.86)
8
Number of samples 20,792 109,573

NOS, Newcastle; Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale

Figure 2 showed meta-analysis study on protective effect of omega-3 fatty acids in fish consumption against breast cancer in Asian patients (OR = 0.80 [95% CI 0.73-0.87, p<0.00001]). Heterogeneity in studies on family history of breast cancer and breast cancer risk in Malays ethnicity in Malaysia and Indonesia (Pheterogeneity = 0.05; I2= 45%) showed a variation of homogeneous research on the occurrence of breast cancer. Funnel plots to identify publication bias among studies protective effect of omega-3 fatty acids in fish consumption against breast cancer in Asian patients was shown in Figure 3.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Forest Plots Dietary Omega-3 Fatty Acids in Fish Consumption Protective Againts Breast Cancer Patients in Asia

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Funnel Plot to Examine Publication Bias for Dietary Omega-3 Fatty Acids in Fish Consumption Protective Againts Breast Cancer Patients in Asia

In Figure 3, it was shown that there was not significant publication bias for studies on protective effect of omega-3 fatty acids in fish consumption against breast cancer in Asian patients included with Egger’s test (P = 0.076) and Begg’s test (P = 0.276).

Discussion

This analysis confirmed the protective effect of omega-3 fatty acids in fish consumption against breast cancer in Asian patients (OR = 0.80 [95% CI 0.73-0.87, p <0.00001]). Dietary fish had been studied in a variation of homogeneous research or no heterogeneity among studies on the occurrence of breast cancer.

High consumption of fish has been associated with lower breast cancer risk (Zheng et al., 2013; Gao et al., 2014). On the other hand, some studies had led to contrary results which fish intake had no correlation to lower risk of breast cancer (Stripp et al., 2003; Holmes et al., 2003; Engeset et al., 2006). In other population, such as European, fish intake had been positively associated with lower breast cancer risk (OR=1.11) as well as in Western countries (OR=1.08) and US (OR=1.05) (Zheng et al., 2013). In Norway, no association found between 5.54 g to 96.77g/ day of fish consumption and breast cancer development (Engeset et al., 2006). The contradictory results of our study to the latter study, possibly due to the different habit of fish consumption in Asian people as the subjects of our study. It has been known that fish intake of Asian population is considerably higher than Western population (Terry et al., 2003; Fabian et al., 2015). Therefore, fish intake in Western populations might be too low to affect breast cancer risk as well as to give an expected protective effect.

Previous study with meta-analysis which combined 26 international studies involving 883,585 female participants, including 20,000 breast cancer patients, found that omega-3 fatty acids intake from fish provided 14% reduction of breast cancer risk (Zheng et al., 2013). Another study by Yang et al., (2014), has found that by increasing the ratio of omega-3 and omega 6 intake, lower risk of breast cancer can be obtained. The study also suggested higher ratio of omega-3 and omega 6 intake as deterrent factor of breast cancer.

Fish is well known as an important source of protein worldwide. Commonly found fish has omega-3 as its content. Omega-3 has been known as fat content of common fish (FAO, 2014). Fish fatty acids usually referred to the longer chain of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) (Kim et al., 2009; Fabian et al., 2015). EPA and DHA are expected to prevent breast cancer by decreasing epidermal growth factor receptor and human epidermal growth factor-2 signaling which reduce proliferation. Ki-67 decrease had also been observed in benign and malignant mammary neoplasm after EPA and DHA supplementation in most preclinical models (Jiang et al., 2012; Yee et al., 2013; Harahap et al., 2018). In addition, factor-κB nuclear translocation and signaling also reduced through the agonist effects of EPA and DHA on peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma and through interaction with the G protein receptor GPR120, which are expected to decrease inhibitors of apoptosis as well as cytokines, adhesion molecules, and metalloproteases (Calder, 2013).

There were several limitations in this meta-analysis review. First, three studies seemed potentially eligible to be included in this meta-analysis but the full-texts were not accessible. Second, nine studies seemed potentially eligible to be included in this meta-analysis but they had insufficient data and unrelevant risk factors for calculation. This issue may raise the possibility of selection bias. Third, data validation not available for dietary questionaires in several studies. Fourth, the number of cases sample in one study was relatively small as it can reduce the statistical strength (Kuriki et al., 2007).

This analysis confirmed the protective effect of omega-3 fatty acids in fish consumption against breast cancer in Asian patients. Based on fish consumption, Asian population has more significant protection from breast cancer than Western population. The results of this study recommend the need to maintain dietary fish intake. Dietary fish could possibly effective for breast cancer prevention. This study also suggests the need for education and counseling about eating habits and the importance of consuming foods with high fish content. The example of fish which commonly found and contain omega-3 fats are salmon, mackerel, herring, lake trout, bluefin tuna, sturgeon, sablefish, anchovy, albacore tuna, whitefish, arctic char, sardines, bluefish, mullet, halibut, striped bass, mahi mahi, pollock, rockfish, rainbow trout, shark, catfish, carp, cod, flounder, grouper, haddock, ocean perch, red snapper, swordfish, pike, sole, tilapia, etc.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

The authors would thanks to Dana Masyarakat (DAMAS) grant Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing Universitas Gadjah Mada 2018 for supporting this research. Riyani Betri Novialita for collecting the data.

References

  1. Calder PC. n-3 fatty acids, inflammation and immunity: new mechanisms to explain old actions. Proc Nutr Soc. 2013;72:326–36. doi: 10.1017/S0029665113001031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dai Q, Shu XO, Jin F, et al. Consumption of animal foods, cooking methods, and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002;11:801–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Engeset D, Alsaker E, Lund E, et al. Fish consumption and breast cancer risk The European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) Int J Cancer. 2006;119:175–82. doi: 10.1002/ijc.21819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fabian CJ, Kimler BF, Hursting SD. Omega-3 fatty acids for breast cancer prevention and survivorship. Breast Cancer Res. 2015;17:62. doi: 10.1186/s13058-015-0571-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. FAO. The state of world fisheries and aquaculture. Opportunities and challenges. Rome, Italy: 2014. [Google Scholar]
  6. Gago-Dominguez M, Yuan JM, Sun CL, et al. Opposing effects of dietary n-3 and n-6 fatty acids on mammary carcinogenesis: The Singapore Chinese Health Study. Br J Cancer. 2003;89:1686–92. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gao CM, Ding JH, Li SP, et al. Active and passive smoking, and alcohol drinking and breast cancer risk in Chinese women. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14:993–6. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2013.14.2.993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gao CM, Ding JH, Li SP, et al. Meat, fish and egg intake and risk of breast cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15:7879–84. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.18.7879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Harahap WA, Sudji IR, Nindrea RD. BRCA1 promoter methylation and clinicopathological characteristics in sporadic breast cancer patients in Indonesia. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018;19:2643–9. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.9.2643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hirose K, Takezaki T, Hamajima N, et al. Dietary factors protective against breast cancer in Japanese premenopausal and postmenopausal women. Int J Cancer. 2003;107:276–82. doi: 10.1002/ijc.11373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Holmes MD, Colditz GA, Hunter DJ, et al. Meat, fish and egg intake and risk of breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 2003;104:221–7. doi: 10.1002/ijc.10910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69–90. doi: 10.3322/caac.20107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jiang W, Zhu Z, McGinley JN, et al. Identification of a molecular signature underlying inhibition of mammary carcinoma growth by dietary N-3 fatty acids. Cancer Res. 2012;72:3795–806. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-1047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kim J, Lim SY, Shin A, et al. Fatty fish and fish omega-3 fatty acid intakes decrease the breast cancer risk: a case-control study. BMC Cancer. 2009;9:216. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-9-216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kuriki K, Hirose K, Wakai K, et al. Breast cancer risk and erythrocyte compositions of n-3 highly unsaturated fatty acids in Japanese. Int J Cancer. 2007;121:377–85. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lambrechts S, Decloedt J, Neven P. Breast cancer prevention: lifestyle changes and chemoprevention. Acta Clin Belg. 2011;66:283–92. doi: 10.2143/ACB.66.4.2062570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009;339:b2700. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Murff HJ, Shu XO, Li H, et al. Dietary Polyunsaturated fatty acids and breast cancer risk in Chinese women: a prospective cohort study. Int J Cancer. 2011;128:1434–41. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Nindrea RD, Aryandono T, Lazuardi L. Breast cancer risk from modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors among women in Southeast Asia: a meta-analysis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2017;18:3201–6. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.12.3201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Nindrea RD, Harahap WA, Aryandono T, Lazuardi L. Association of BRCA1 Promoter methylation with breast cancer in Asia: a meta- analysis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018;19:885–9. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.4.885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Nindrea RD, Aryandono T, Lazuardi L, Dwiprahasto I. Diagnostic accuracy of different machine learning algorithms for breast cancer risk calculation: a meta-analysis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018;19:1747–52. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.7.1747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sangrajrang S, Chaiwerawattana A, Ploysawang P, et al. Obesity, diet and physical inactivity and risk of breast cancer in Thai women. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14:7023–7. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2013.14.11.7023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Shannon J, Ray R, Wu C, et al. Food and botanical groupings and risk of breast cancer: A case-control study in Shanghai, China. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14:81–90. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Stripp C, Overvad K, Christensen J, et al. Fish intake is positively associated with breast cancer incidence rate. J Nutr. 2003;133:3664–9. doi: 10.1093/jn/133.11.3664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Terry PD, Rohan TE, Wolk A. Intakes of fish and marine fatty acids and the risks of cancers of the breast and prostate and of other hormone-related cancers: a review of the epidemiologic evidence. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;77:532–43. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/77.3.532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Wakai K, Tamakoshi K, Date C, et al. Dietary intakes of fat and fatty acids and risk of breast cancer: A prospective study in Japan. Cancer Sci. 2005;96:590–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2005.00084.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. 2009. [[cited 2018 May 5]]. Available from: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp.
  28. Yang B, Ren XL, Fu YQ, Gao JL, Li D. Ratio of n-3/n-6 PUFAs and risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis of 274135 adult females from 11 independent prospective studies. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:105. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Yaw YH, Shariff ZM, Kandiah M, et al. Diet and physical activity in relation to weight change among breast cancer patients. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15:39–44. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.1.39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Yee LD, Agarwal D, Rosol TJ, et al. The inhibition of early stages of HER-2/neu-mediated mammary carcinogenesis by dietary n-3 PUFAs. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2013;57:320–7. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201200445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Zhang CX, Ho SC, Chen YM, et al. Meat and egg consumption and risk of breast cancer among Chinese women. Cancer Causes Control. 2009;20:1845–53. doi: 10.1007/s10552-009-9377-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Zheng JS, Hu XJ, Zhao YM, et al. Intake of fish and marine n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and risk of breast cancer: meta-analysis of data from 21 independent prospective cohort studies. BMJ. 2013;346:f3706. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f3706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention : APJCP are provided here courtesy of West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention

RESOURCES