Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jan 15.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Res. 2019 Jun 4;79(14):3583–3594. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-3275

A model system for studying the DNMT3A hotspot mutation (DNMT3AR882) demonstrates a causal relationship between its dominant-negative effect and leukemogenesis

Rui Lu 1,2,§, Jun Wang 1,2, Zhihong Ren 1,2,, Jiekai Yin 3,4, Yinsheng Wang 3,4, Ling Cai 1,5, Gang Greg Wang 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC6897384  NIHMSID: NIHMS1531180  PMID: 31164355

Abstract

Mutation of DNA methyltransferase 3A at arginine 882 (DNMT3AR882mut) is prevalent in hematological cancers and disorders. Recently, DNMT3AR882mut has been shown to have hypomorphic, dominant-negative, and/or gain-of-function effects on DNA methylation under different biological contexts. However, the causal role for such a multifaceted effect of DNMT3AR882mut in leukemogenesis remains undetermined. Here, we report TF-1 leukemia cells as a robust system useful for modeling the DNMT3AR882mut-dependent transformation and for dissecting the cause-effect relationship between multifaceted activities of DNMT3AR882mut and leukemic transformation. Ectopic expression of DNMT3AR882mut and not wildtype DNMT3A promoted TF-1 cell transformation characterized by cytokine-independent growth, and induces CpG hypomethylation predominantly at enhancers. This effect was dose-dependent, acted synergistically with the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutation, and resembled what was seen in human leukemia patients carrying DNMT3AR882mut. The transformation- and hypomethylation-inducing capacities of DNMT3AR882mut relied on a motif involved in heterodimerization whereas its various chromatin-binding domains were dispensable. Mutation of the heterodimerization motif that interferes with DNMT3AR882mut binding to endogenous wildtype DNMT proteins partially reversed the CpG hypomethylation phenotype caused by DNMT3AR882mut, thus supporting a dominant-negative mechanism in cells. In mice, bromodomain inhibition repressed gene-activation events downstream of DNMT3AR882mut-induced CpG hypomethylation, thereby suppressing leukemogenesis mediated by DNMT3AR882mut. Collectively, this study reports a model system useful for studying DNMT3AR882mut, shows a requirement of the dominant-negative effect by DNMT3AR882mut for leukemogenesis, and describes an attractive strategy for the treatment of leukemias carrying DNMT3AR882mut.

Introduction

Aberration of the epigenomic state is commonly utilized by tumors to alter gene-expression programs and to gain growth advantage (1,2). Sequencing of primary cancer samples has identified recurrent mutations of genes involved in epigenomic regulation (2,3). In particular, somatic mutation of DNA methyltransferase 3A (DNMT3Amut) was detected in a wide range of blood cancers including 20–30% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (37), as well as elderly individuals with clonal hematopoiesis (811).

DNMT3A forms a complex with accessory cofactors, serving as one of the major de novo DNA methyltransferases (1214). DNMT3A harbors various motifs, which include a N-terminal domain (NTD) shown to interact with transcription factors (7), a Pro-Trp-Trp-Pro (PWWP) domain shown to engage methylated histone H3 lysine 36 (H3K36me) (15), an ATRX-DNMT3-DNMT3L (ADD) domain known to bind specifically to the unmodified histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4me0) (14,16), and a C-terminal catalytic domain that methylates cytosine bases, especially those in the CpG dinucleotides (1214). Cellular contexts such as interacting partners and chromatin states are crucial for exquisite modulation of DNMT3A’s genomic targeting and enzymatic functions. For example, DNMT3A adopts an auto-inhibitory conformation due to interaction between its ADD and methyltransferase domains, and such self-inhibition is released upon engagement of ADD to histone tails with H3K4me0 (14). The methyltransferase domain, which binds DNA using specified protein motifs (12), also contains crucial interfaces for forming DNMT dimers, tetramers and/or oligomers to regulate the methylation activities (13,14,1722).

DNMT3Amut is primarily heterozygotes in AMLs and shows a mutational hotspot at the Arg882 residue (DNMT3AR882mut), which accounts for 50–60% of identified DNMT3Amut in AMLs (2,3,7,23). Due to prevalence and clinical relevance of DNMT3AR882mut in blood cancer and clonal hematopoiesis, considerable progress was made in understanding the mechanisms by which DNMT3AR882mut mediates transformation. DNMT3AR882mut is detected in hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs) of apparently healthy elderly individuals, supporting its role as a pre-leukemic founder mutation that provides initial selective advantage of mutant HSPC clones (811). We and others have shown that a cooperating genetic lesion is required for DNMT3AR882mut or Dnmt3a loss to induce fully-blown leukemias in mice (2428). Biochemically, partial loss-of-function, dominant-negative and gain-of-function effects have all been associated to DNMT3AR882mut. First, DNMT3AR882mut is a hypomorphic allele and purified DNMT3AR882mut enzymes display reduced methyltransferase activity on CpG substrates in vitro (4,12,29,30). Particularly, the structure of the DNMT3A-DNMT3L-CpG complexes was recently solved, which revealed that the residue R882 forms interactions with both DNA substrates and a so-called ‘Target Recognition Domain’ loop, a DNMT3A motif critically involved in engaging CpG dinucleotides (12). Furthermore, the dominant-negative effect was proposed for DNMT3AR882mut (29,31). Here, DNMT3AR882mut associates with wildtype DNMT3A and DNMT3B, presumably interfering with the formation, stability, DNA-engaging and/or DNA-methylating activity of the whole complex. The combined hypomorphic and dominant-negative effects of DNMT3AR882mut may explain focal CpG hypomethylation seen in leukemias harboring DNMT3AR882mut. On the other hand, recent studies reported an altered substrate preference of DNMT3AR882mut towards CpG sites with specific flanking sequence, which is termed as the gain-of-function effect of DNMT3AR882mut (32). Theoretically, these above effects of DNMT3AR882mut are not mutually exclusive, indicating that DNMT3A hotspot mutation causes redistribution of DNA methylation in the cancer genome. However, it remains elusive by what effect(s) DNMT3AR882mut contributes to transformation.

This study aims to determine a causal relationship between the multifaceted effect of DNMT3AR882mut and leukemic transformation. Previously, the systems reported for studying the leukemia-promoting functions of DNMT3AR882mut used retrovirus-based or knock-in expression of DNMT3AR882mut, often in combination with other mutations, in HSPCs (2428), which represents a challenge to perform cause-effect relationship studies of DNMT3AR882mut. We here report a leukemia cell line, TF-1 cells, as a straightforward, robust cell model for assaying the DNMT3AR882mut-dependent leukemic transformation and, more importantly, for dissecting the molecular basis by which DNMT3AR882mut mediates transformation. We show that enforced expression of DNMT3AR882mut alone, but not DNMT3AWT, is sufficient to induce TF-1 cell transformation characterized by cytokine-independent growth and arrested cell differentiation. In TF-1 cells, DNMT3AR882mut induces hypomethylation of CpG sites that significantly overlap those found in primary AMLs with DNMT3AR882mut. With this model system, we also demonstrated the dosage effect of DNMT3AR882mut on transformation, as well as cooperativity between DNMT3AR882mut and IDH1 mutation, the two lesions coexisting in human leukemias. Importantly, this system has allowed us to systemically analyze dependency of various functional motifs within DNMT3AR882mut during transformation. Here we identified a heterodimerization domain (also known as DNMT3A’s heterotetramer or FF interface) (13,1821), and not its catalytic and chromatin-binding domains, to be essential for TF-1 cell transformation. The mutation of the heterodimerization interface interfered with interaction of DNMT3AR882mut with endogenous wildtype DNMT proteins and partially reversed CpG hypomethylation caused by DNMT3AR882mut, supporting a dominant-negative mechanism that underlies transformation. Lastly, we found the bromodomain inhibitor suppressed the gene-activation programs associated with DNMT3AR882mut-induced hypomethylation. Collectively, this study describes a model system for studying the DNMT3AR882mut-related leukemogenesis, demonstrates a cause-effect relationship between the dominant-negative effect and DNMT3AR882mut-mediated transformation, and provides an attractive therapeutic means for treatment of leukemias carrying DNMT3AR882mut.

Materials and Methods

Cell lines

The human erythroleukemic cell line TF-1 (ATCC #CRL-2003) is cultured in the RPMI 1640 medium (Invitrogen) containing 10% of FBS and 2 ng/ml of recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF, R&D Systems) as described (12). Authentication of identities of parental and derived cell lines was ensured by the Tissue Culture Facility affiliated to UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center with the genetic signature profiling and fingerprinting analysis. Every month, a routine examination of cell lines in culture for any possible mycoplasma contamination was performed using commercially available detection kits (Lonza). Cells with less than of 10 times of passages were used in the study.

Co-immunoprecipitation (CoIP)

CoIP was carried out as previously described (33).

DNA methylation array and data analysis

Genomic DNA was extracted using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen), followed by bisulfite-conversion using the EZ DNA Methylation-Gold Kit (Zymo Research). DNA methylation profiling was performed by the UNC Genomics Core using the Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip (lllumina) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Methylation data were then subject to background subtraction and control normalization by executing preprocessIllumina in the R ‘minfi’ package (34). Differentially methylated CpGs were identified using dmpFinder in a categorical mode. Methylation changes were considered significant at a q-value of less than 0.05 and a beta value difference of more than 0.1. Hierarchical clustering analysis, scatter plots and density plots were generated in R using ‘pheatmap’, and ‘ggplot2’ packages as previously described (12).

Chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by deep sequencing (ChIP-Seq)

ChIP-seq was carried out using BRD4 antibody (Sigma, HPA015055) as previously described (24,35).

Animal models

All animal experiments were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of UNC. Establishment and phenotypic analysis of murine leukemia models were performed as previously described (24,36,37) and in vivo dosing of I-BET151 carried out with a described procedure (35).

Data availability

The Genomics data produced by this study, including ChIP-Seq and methylome, have been deposited in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under accession code GEO: GSE130094, GSE130634 and GSE71475.

The details of experimental procedures are provided in Supplementary Materials and Methods.

Results

DNMT3AR882mut induces transformation of TF-1 cells characterized by cytokine-independent growth.

To delineate the molecular underpinnings of DNMT3AR882mut-mediated leukemogenesis, we sought to identify a robust, straightforward cell transformation system that allows cause-effect relationship studies of DNMT3AR882mut. We chosen to use TF-1 cells, for this leukemia line normally relies on survival-supporting cytokines to sustain cell proliferation but displays cytokine-independent growth upon acquisition of certain leukemia-related alterations such as IDH2 or TET2 mutation (38,39). To test whether DNMT3AR882mut has transformation activities in this model, we stably expressed comparable levels of DNMT3AWT or a prevalent form of DNMT3AR882mut, Arg882His (DNMT3AR882H), into TF-1 cells (Fig. 1A insert, and Supplementary Fig. 1AB). In the presence of survival cytokines, TF-1 cells with either DNMT3A form showed the same rates of proliferation (Fig. 1A); however, under cytokine-poor conditions, only TF-1 cells with DNMT3AR882H, not vehicle or DNMT3AWT, demonstrated robust growth (Figure 1B). Relative to controls, TF-1 cells with DNMT3AR882H also showed a mild but reproducible differentiation arrest in response to differentiation signals (Supplementary Fig. 1CD). As some DNMT3A mutations found in hematological cancer are damaging ones such as frame-shifting, we asked whether TF-1 cell transformation can be recapitulated by DNMT3A loss. Indeed, knockdown of DNMT3A by independent shRNAs, and not mock, resulted in cytokine-independent proliferation (Supplementary Fig. 1E and Fig. 1C). Similar phenotypes were observed with other DNMT3AR882mut variants (Arg882Cys and Arg882Ser; Fig. 1D). Next, we ask whether such a transformation phenotype requires continuous expression of DNMT3AR882H. Here, a reversible expression system, which carries a pair of LoxP sites flanking the transgene (Fig. 1F, upper), was used to generate cytokine-independent TF-1 lines with DNMT3AR882H. After cre-mediated deletion of DNMT3AR882mut (Figure 1F, bottom; Supplementary Fig. 1F), we found that these cells no longer sustained cytokine-independent growth (Figure 1G). Collectively, we show that DNMT3AR882mut induces cytokine-independent growth of TF-1 cells and maintenance of this phenotype relies on continuous presence of DNMT3AR882mut.

Figure 1. R882H-mutated DNMT3A (DNMT3AR882mut), and not the wild-type one (DNMT3AWT), induces transformation of TF-1 cells characterized by cytokine-independent growth.

Figure 1.

(A-B) Proliferation of TF-1 cells with stable transduction of the indicated gene in the presence (A) and absence (B) of GM-CSF. Insert in panel A, anti-Myc immunoblotting of tagged DNMT3A.

(C) Proliferation of TF-1 cells post-transduction of shRNA vector (control) or DNMT3A-targeted shRNAs under the GM-CSF-depleted culture condition.

(D) Proliferation of TF-1 cells with stable expression of vector, DNMT3AWT or DNMT3AR882mut (DNMT3AR882C/S) upon GM-CSF removal. Insert, anti-Myc immunoblotting of tagged DNMT3A.

(F) A vector LEGO-iG2 (upper) that allows the cre-mediated depletion and thus reversible expression of DNMT3AR882H as verified by immunoblotting (bottom).

(G) Proliferation of the indicated TF-1 lines upon GM-CSF removal, after depletion of DNMT3AR882H under the cytokine-rich condition.

DNMT3AR882mut induces a CpG hypomethylation phenotype in TF-1 cells, resembling what was seen in AML patients with DNMT3AR882mut.

Human AMLs carrying DNMT3AR882mut exhibit focal DNA hypomethylation (29), a phenotype also observed in murine leukemias with DNMT3AR882mut (24). To investigate effect of DNMT3AR882mut on DNA methylation in TF-1 cells, we performed methylome profiling with Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip (450K array). Out of a total of 485,512 CpG sites, we identified 6,995 (1.44%) as differentially methylated CpG probes (DMPs) among TF-1 lines with DNMT3AR882H relative to vector-expressing controls (Fig. 2A and Supplementary Table S1). Among the identified DMPs, almost all (6,958; 99.47%) showed hypomethylation and only 37 (0.53%) displayed hypermethylation (Fig. 2AB). In contrast, the majority of DMPs in TF-1 cells expressing DNMT3AWT, relative to control, showed the increased DNA methylation (Supplementary Fig. 2A). Similar patterns of focal CpG hypomethylation were seen with DNMT3AR882C and DNMT3AR882S (Supplementary Fig. 2B). To delineate the genomic feature of DNMT3AR882H-associated DMPs in TF-1 cells, we related the identified DMPs to 15 chromatin modifications of K562 leukemia cells (40) and found that DNMT3AR882H-associated DMPs with hypomethylation occurred preferentially at gene enhancers, and not promoters or heterochromatin (Fig. 2C). These results suggest enhancer as genomic regions predominantly affected by DNMT3AR882H in TF-1 cells, which is consistent with previous findings seen in murine leukemias harboring DNMT3AR882H or Dnmt3a knockout (24,41,42).

Figure 2. DNMT3AR882mut mainly induces DNA hypo-methylation in TF-1 cells.

Figure 2.

(A) Distribution of differentially methylated probes (DMPs), either hypo (left) or hyper-methylated (right), as defined in TF-1 stable cell lines with DNMT3AR882H, relative to vector controls, cultured in the presence of GM-CSF.

(B) Heatmap shows relative methylation of DMPs defined in panel A among independent TF-1 lines with stable transduction of DNMT3AR882H (RH; n=5) or empty vector (EV; n=5).

(C) Enrichment of DNMT3AR882H-induced hypomethylated DMPs at genomic features annotated by the ENCODE K562 ChromHMM (40).

(D) Venn diagram shows significant overlapping between DMPs with the DNMT3AR882H-induced hypo-methylation in TF-1 cells and those associated with DNMT3AR882mut in human AMLs (29).

(E) Methylation levels indicated by beta values (y-axis) at representative DNMT3AR882H-associated DMPs in the indicated TF-1 lines expressing EV, DNMT3AWT or DNMT3AR882mut (RH, RC or RS; upper panel) or among human AMLs with DNMT3AWT or DNMT3Amut at the R882 or non-R822 residue (bottom panel).

(F) Sanger sequencing showing CpG methylation levels at the indicated site (upper; black arrow) in parental TF-1 cells (left) or those transformed lines before (middle) and after depletion of DNMT3AR882H (right; see also Fig. 1FG).

To determine clinical relevance of our above finding, we compared DNMT3AR882mut-associated DMPs found in TF-1 cells to those based on the TCGA methylome studies of AML patients (3). Here, we found a significant overlap between hypomethylated DMPs identified from TF-1 cells and human AMLs with DNMT3AR882mut (Fig. 2D; Supplementary Table S1), as exemplified by DMPs at SH3TC2, FOXK2, and GP9 (Fig. 2E). Additionally, principal component analysis (PCA) of DNMT3AR882H-induced hypomethylated DMPs showed that the methylation pattern of TF-1 cells with DNMT3AR882H resembled AML patients with DNMT3AR882mut more than those with DNMT3AWT (Supplementary Fig. 2C). Moreover, in TF-1 lines with reversible DNMT3AR882H expression (Figure 1FG), we found that hypomethylation at the examined region relies on continuous presence of DNMT3AR882H (Figure 2F; cre+ vs cre-). Together, we show that DNMT3AR882H-expressing TF-1 cells carry methylation alterations shared by human AMLs, lending support for using TF-1 cells as a model to study DNMT3AR882mut.

DNMT3AR882H and IDH mutations cooperate to promote TF-1 cell transformation.

In the clinic, DNMT3A and IDH1/2 mutations frequently co-occur (3) and genetic interaction between DNMT3AR882H and IDH2R140Q was verified in mice (42). To query whether TF-1 cells is also suitable for studying synergy between IDH and DNMT3A mutations, we established TF-1 lines with expression of DNMT3AR882H, IDH1R132H, or their combination (Fig. 3A). TF-1 cells expressing either mutation showed considerable proliferation post-removal of survival cytokines; however, significantly more growth under cytokine-poor conditions was seen with cells carrying both mutations (Fig. 3B). Methylome analysis revealed that DNMT3AR882H alone and IDH1R132H alone predominantly induced hypo- and hypermethylation, respectively (Fig. 3C), with the commonly affected sites accounting for merely ~5–10% (Fig. 3D). This suggests that DNMT3AR882H and IDH1R132H target different genomic regions to induce methylation changes. Moreover, a large majority of CpGs affected by either mutation alone were no longer affected in TF-1 cells with dual mutations, while new events of hyper- and hypo-methylation at additional CpG sites were gained by these cells (Fig. 3E). This phenomenon of ‘epigenetic antagonism’ is similar to what was seen in AMLs carrying dual mutations of DNMT3AR882H and IDH2R140Q (42). Together, our results support TF-1 cells as a model useful for studying synergistic effect of DNMT3A and IDH1 mutations.

Figure 3. DNMT3AR882H acts in concert with IDH1R132H to promote transformation.

Figure 3.

(A) Immunoblotting of Myc-tagged DNMT3A and Flag-tagged IDH1 in the indicated TF-1 stable lines.

(B) Proliferation of the indicated TF-1 lines upon GM-CSF removal.

(C) Scatter plot showing the DNMT3AR882H-associated hypomethylated DMPs (left panel; red) and IDH1R132H-associated hypermethylated DMPs (right; blue) found in TF-1 cells transduced with either mutation (y-axis), relative to vector controls (x-axis).

(D) Venn diagram using DNMT3AR882H-associated hypomethylated DMPs and IDH1R132H-associated hypermethylated DMPs found in TF-1 cells.

(E) Scatter plot showing DNA methylation in TF-1 cells expressing dual DNMT3AR882H/IDH1R132H mutations (y-axis), relative to vector controls (x-axis). Red and blue show the DNMT3AR882H-associated hypomethylated DMPs and IDH1R132H-associated hypermethylated DMPs as defined in panels C-D, respectively.

Effect of DNMT3AR882mut on CpG hypomethylation and TF-1 cell transformation is dosage-dependent.

DNMT3AR882mut is believed to act as a founder mutation during leukemogenesis, and there is an age-dependent increase in incidence of clonal hematopoiesis among individuals carrying DNMT3AR882mut (8,9). These studies indicate that effect of DNMT3AR882mut might be time- and dose-dependent, with affected epigenomic alterations accumulating during the course of disease progression. To test this hypothesis, we co-expressed DNMT3AR882mut together with GFP in an internal ribosome entry site (IRES)-based coexpression system and, based on GFP sorting, we established a set of TF-1 stable lines with increasing levels of DNMT3AR882H–IRES-GFP expression (Supplementary Fig. 3A). By RT-PCR and immunoblotting, we confirmed serially increased DNMT3AR882H levels in cells (Fig. 4AB). Using 450K arrays, we found a positive correlation between DNMT3AR882H dosage and the total number of DMPs with induced hypomethylation (Fig. 4C), as exemplified by those at SH3TC2 and GP9 (Supplemental Fig. 3B). Importantly, cultivation under cytokine-poor conditions showed the cytokine-independent outgrowth also correlated with the DNMT3AR882H dosage (Fig. 4D). As control, we also established TF1 lines with increasing expression of DNMT3AWT (Fig. 4AB) and found that the DNMT3AWT dosages had no effect on cytokine-independent growth (Fig. 4D). These results demonstrate a dose-dependent action for DNMT3AR882mut in inducing CpG hypomethylation and TF-1 cell transformation.

Figure 4. DNMT3AR882H promotes leukemic cell transformation and DNA hypo-methylation in a dose-dependent manner.

Figure 4.

(A-B) RT-qPCR (A) and immunoblot (B) validation of serially increased levels of DNMT3A, either WT (blue) or R882H-mutated (red), after GFP-based sorting of TF-1 cells. Expression values shown were normalized to control. Control: parental TF-1 cells. L, M, H, VH denote low, medium, high, very high, respectively.

(C) Scatter plot showing DNA methylation levels of DMPs in TF-1 lines expressing the serially increased DNMT3AR882H (y-axis) relative to vector controls (x-axis). DMPs were defined with a beta-value change more than 0.15 and a p-value less than 0.05. Hypo-DMPs are marked in reds, with their numbers labeled at the bottom; hyper-DMPs are marked in grey.

(D) Proliferation of TF-1 cells expressing different levels of DNMT3A upon cytokine removal.

Effect of DNMT3AR882mut on TF-1 leukemia cell transformation is independent of its catalytic function.

Previously, it was shown that DNMT3AR882mut is not a null mutant and shows a mildly or partially reduced methyltransferase activity as assayed in vitro (4,12,20,29,30). Moreover, recent studies reported that, relative to DNMT3AWT, DNMT3AR882mut exhibits the increased methylation activity in vitro towards certain CpG substrates with a specific flanking sequence, implicating a gain-of-function action (32). However, to what extent gain-of-function effect of DNMT3AR882mut contributes to transformation remains undefined. First, we found that, in TF-1 cells with DNMT3AR882mut, the induced hypermethylation only represents a minor event (Fig 2A). This is reminiscent of what was observed in murine DNMT3AR882H-expressing HSPCs with a more comprehensive enhanced reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (eRRBS) platform where hypomethylation accounted for 80.8% of detected changes (24). Next, we closely examined this published eRRBS dataset and focused on sites with hypermethylation and direct binding of DNMT3AR882H (24). Here, we did not observe significant preference towards CpG-flanking sequences (Supplementary Fig. 4AB). Next, to testify whether the enzymatic activity retained in DNMT3AR882mut is essential for transformation, we introduced an enzymatic-dead mutation, P709V/C710D or E756A (12,15), into DNMT3AR882H, followed by TF-1 cell transduction (Fig. 5A). Under cytokine-poor culture conditions, neither of enzymatic-dead mutations interfered with the transforming capacity of DNMT3AR882H (Fig. 5B). These observations support that the remaining catalytic activity harbored within DNMT3AR882mut is not essential for transformation.

Figure 5. Effect of DNMT3AR882H on TF-1 cell transformation is independent of its catalytic function but requires its heterodimerization interface.

Figure 5.

(A) Immunoblot showing the level of the indicated Myc-tagged DNMT3A mutant post-transduction into TF-1 cells.

(B) Proliferation of TF-1 cells expressing the indicated DNMT3A mutant upon cytokine removal.

(C-F) Schematic representation of different truncation (C) or point mutation (E) of Myc-tagged DNMT3AR882H, with anti-Myc immunoblots (D and F) showing protein levels of the indicated DNMT3A forms post-transduction into TF-1 cells. EV, empty vector.

(G-H) Proliferation of TF-1 cells expressing the indicated truncation (G) or point mutant form (H) of DNMT3AR882H upon cytokine removal.

Effect of DNMT3AR882H on TF-1 leukemia cell transformation relies on its heterodimerization interface and not chromatin-binding motifs.

To dissect the basis underlying DNMT3AR882mut-mediated transformation, we systematically mutated its functional motifs (Fig. 5C) that were known to mediate chromatin or protein-protein interactions (19). First, we found that, unlike deletion of the NTD or PWWP domains, deletion of ADD severely affected protein stability of DNMT3AR882H (Fig. 5D). Thus, we also employed point mutations of the motif that did not affect stability, D333A (D329A in mouse Dnmt3a) and D529A/D531A shown to disrupt the H3K36me3- and H3K4me0-binding of PWWP and ADD, respectively (14,15) (Fig. 5EF). Relative to DNMT3AR882H, all derived deletion or double mutants affecting the NTD, PWWP or ADD domain showed comparable abilities to sustain cytokine-free proliferation in TF-1 cells (Fig. 5GH).

DNMT3L is not expressed in AML (29) and DNMT3A may form high-order protein complexes with itself (17,18,20,22,29,32,43) or DNMT3B (31,44,45). DNMT3AR882mut was proposed to act in a dominant-negative manner by ‘hijacking’ and interfering with functions of wild-type DNMT3A/B proteins via a heterodimerization interface (29,31). However, the causal role for such an effect in leukemic transformation has not been formally tested. To this end, we introduced into DNMT3AR882H a mutation previously shown to disrupt the heterodimerization-interface-mediated interaction, i.e. F732A or Y735A (Fig. 5E and supplementary Fig. 4C) (18,20). After transduction into TF-1 cells, the DNMT3AR882H/Y735A double mutant showed comparable protein stability (Fig. 5F) whereas DNMT3AR882H/F732A was unstable and excluded from subsequent analyses (supplementary Fig. 4D). We found that, relative to DNMT3AR882H, DNMT3AR882H/Y735A displayed significantly reduced abilities to sustain cytokine-free growth of TF-1 cells (Fig. 5H, orange).

To gain mechanistic insights, we further assessed interactions of DNMT3AR882H/F732A with endogenous DNMTs, and observed that, relative to DNMT3AR882H, DNMT3AR882H/Y735A is defective in forming efficient interactions with wild-type DNMT3A and DNMT3B in cells (Fig. 6A), which is in agreement with in vitro analysis of mutations affecting this heterodimerization or FF interface (18,20). Next, we examined methylation changes induced by the double mutation forms of DNMT3AR882H. Consistent with transformation results, deletion or point mutation of PWWP and ADD did not interfere with the ability of DNMT3AR882H to induce hypomethylation (Fig. 6B). In contrast, much fewer of CpG sites exhibited significant hypomethylation in TF-1 cells post-transduction of DNMT3AR882H/Y735A (Fig. 6B).

Figure 6. CpG hypomethylation-inducing effect of DNMT3AR882H requires its heterodimerization interface.

Figure 6.

(A) CoIP with anti-Myc antibodies detects interaction of the Myc-tagged DNMT3AR882H (middle) or DNMT3AR882H/Y735A (right) with endogenous wildtype DNMT3B or DNMT3A proteins.

(B) Summary of the total number of hypo-methylated DMPs induced by the indicated variant forms of DNMT3AR882H, relative to vector control (as shown in Figure 2A; with beta value decrease more than 0.1).

(C) RT-qPCR detecting expression of LMO2 in TF-1 lines with stable transduction of empty vector (EV) or the indicated DNMT3A forms at day 12 post-withdrawal of GM-CSF.

DNA methylation is implicated in regulation of numerous cellular processes including transcription, genome stability and mRNA splicing (46,47). Here, we aimed to gain a glimpse of how DNMT3AR882H affects gene transcription. We looked closely at LMO2, a transcription factor related to leukemogenesis (48) including AML with Dnmt3a mutation (28), for LMO2 shows consistent CpG hypomethylation in TF1 cells with DNMT3AR882mut and TCGA methylome studies of AML patients (Supplementary Fig. 5 and Supplemental Table 1). By RT-qPCR, we found expression of LMO2 activated in TF-1 cells with DNMT3AR882H but repressed in those with DNMT3AWT, relative to control (Fig. 6C, middle); furthermore, the heterodimerization-interface-defective mutation, Y735A, significantly interfered with the LMO2-activating effect of DNMT3AR882H (Fig. 6C, right).

Together, we show that disrupting heterodimerization interactions severely interferes with the ability of DNMT3AR882H to induce CpG hypomethylation, LMO2 activation, and cytokine-free growth in TF-1 cells.

Bromodomain inhibition reversed gene-activation events downstream of DNMT3AR882H-mediated CpG hypomethylation, providing a means for treating AMLs with DNMT3AR882H.

Our above observations support a causal relationship between transformation and CpG hypomethylation, which is most likely due to combined hypomorphic and dominant-negative effects by DNMT3AR882H. This further indicates that targeting events downstream of the induced CpG hypomethylation represents a therapeutic strategy. Our prior study of DNMT3AR882H–dependent murine AML models has revealed a marked increase of histone acetylation at gene-regulatory regions carrying DNMT3AR882H–induced CpG hypomethylation (24). Histone acetylation ‘readers’ such as BRD4 engage acetylated histones, potentiating gene activation. Using ChIP-Seq performed with DNMT3AR882H–dependent murine AML cells, we found H3K27ac and BRD4 bound at the DNMT3AR882H–associated target signature genes that we previously defined (24), which include leukemia-related ‘stemness’ and pro-survival oncogenes such as Mn1, Mycn and Bcl2 (Fig. 7A). Next, we queried whether BRD4 inhibition has therapeutic effect. We first examined sensitivity to I-BET151, a BRD4 inhibitor, using murine AML lines we previously established with dual DNMT3AR882H and RAS mutations (24). A strong growth inhibition effect of I-BET151 was observed, with IC50 calculated at ~100 nM (Fig. 7B). Importantly, transcriptome analysis showed that BRD4 blockade resulted in down-regulation of DNMT3AR882H–associated target signature genes (24) (Fig. 7CD). As well, gene ontology (GO) analysis showed that I-BET151 caused profound changes, including up-regulation of apoptosis-related genes and down-regulation of cell cycle progression genes (Supplementary Fig. 6A). Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) further revealed that genes related to MYC targets, stemness, proliferation, DNA replication and cancer-associated signatures were all suppressed by I-BET151 (Fig. 7EG; Supplementary Fig. 6B).

Figure 7. BRD4 blockade is efficient in treatment of murine AML established by combinational DNMT3AR882H and NRASG12D mutations.

Figure 7.

(A) IGV track views of BRD4 and H3K27ac ChIP-seq signals at the indicated gene in murine AML cells established by co-expressed DNMT3AR882H and NRASG12D (termed as DNMT3AR882H/NRASG12D AML lines) (24).

(B) Relative proliferation of the DNMT3AR882H/NRASG12D AML lines post-treatment with I-BET151 relative to mock. Dashed line indicates the half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50).

(C) GSEA showing that the DNMT3A signature genes were repressed by I-BET151. Mouse_Gene_2.0_ST arrays were performed using the DNMT3AR882H/NRASG12D AML cells treated with either DMSO or 100 nM I-BET151 for 24 hours.

(D) Heatmap showing the most repressed DNMT3A signature genes by BRD4 inhibitors. Rep, replicate.

(E-G) GSEA shows downregulation of the indicated genesets related to MYC targets (E), stem cell (F) or pediatric cancer markers (G) post-treatment with I-BET151.

(H) Survival of mice transplanted with the DNMT3AR882H/NRASG12D AML cells and then treated with either vehicle (n = 8) or I-BET151 (n = 6). Significance was tested by log rank test.

(I-J) White blood cell counts (I), representative images of spleens (J, top; scale bar, 1 cm) and Wright-Giemsa staining of bone marrow cells (J, bottom; scale bar, 10 μm) from mice transplanted with the DNMT3AR882H/NRASG12D AML cells and treated with either vehicle or I-BET151 for 10 days.

(K-L) Kaplan-meier survival curve (K) and representative bioluminescent images (L, at day 20) of mice transplanted with DNMT3AR882H/NRASG12D AML cells and treated with either vehicle, trametinib or I-BET151 alone, or their combination. Significance was tested by log rank test.

Next, we evaluated in vivo therapeutic effect of I-BET151 on murine AMLs induced by dual DNMT3AR882H and RASG12D mutations. Compared to mock, I-BET151 treatment significantly prolonged survival of leukemic mice (Fig. 7H). Compared to mock, I-BET151 treatment also significantly delayed development of AML phenotypes such as splenomegaly, elevated counts of white blood cells and reduce counts of red blood cells (Fig. 7IJ, Supplementary Fig. 4C). Following I-BET151 treatment, less AML blasts were also observed in the bone marrow (Fig. 7J, bottom). Given that I-BET151 inhibits the DNMT3AR882H-related gene-expression programs, we next ask whether inhibition of RAS signaling has additional therapeutic effect in this model. To this end, we used trametinib, an FDA-approved inhibitor of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) (49). Indeed, while dosing with trametinib or I-BET151 alone considerably delayed AML progression as measured by animal survival and bioluminescence imaging, their combinational treatment had more significant AML-inhibitory effect in vivo (Figure 7KL).

Collectively, bromodomain inhibition not only represses gene-expression programs related to DNMT3AR882H-induced hypomethylation but, importantly, suppresses development of the DNMT3AR882H-related murine AMLs in vivo, either alone or in combination with MEK inhibitors.

Discussion

DNMT3Amut is prevalent in patients with hematological malignancies and disorders. It is proposed that DNMT3Amut acts as a founder mutation shaping the course of leukemia evolution and progression. The literature has documented that DNMT3AR882mut has hypomorphic, dominant-negative and/or gain-of-function effects under different biological contexts. However, it remains undefined by what effects DNMT3AR882mut mediates leukemogenesis. We started the investigations first by reporting TF1 cells as a robust system useful for studying DNMT3Amut-related leukemic phenotypes, which then allowed us to next examine activities underlying DNMT3AR882mut-induced transformation. Based on the mechanistic studies, we further show that BRD4 inhibition reverses gene-expression programs downstream of disease-relevant effect of DNMT3AR882mut, thus suggesting a potential means of therapeutics.

Compared to the previously described in vivo and primary cell systems for studying DNMT3AR882mut (2428), TF-1 cells is straightforward and suitable for cause-effect relationship studies to delineate the role for multifaceted effects of DNMT3AR882mut during leukemic transformation. Via a systematic interrogation of various motifs in DNMT3AR882mut with this system, we show that the transformation-promoting function of DNMT3AR882mut is independent of its residual catalytic activity (as assayed by double mutants carrying a enzyme-dead mutation), suggesting that CpG methylation gains at certain specific sequence contexts, as proposed in the gain-of-function model (32), is unlikely to contribute to leukemogenesis. In contrast, mutating a heterodimerization interface not only interfered with physical associations of DNMT3AR882mut to endogenous wildtype DNMT3A/B proteins but also largely abolished the ability of DNMT3AR882mut in inducing CpG hypomethylation and TF-1 cell transformation. These findings support a causal relationship between the dominant-negative effect of DNMT3AR882mut and transformation. Furthermore, purified DNMT3AR882mut enzymes were known to be hypomorphic (4,12,20,29,30); recent structural studies further showed that R882 forms interactions with both DNA substrates and a so-called ‘Target Recognition Domain’ loop, which indicated its role in substrate binding and/or enzymatic functions (12). Our results thus support that combined hypomorphic and dominant-negative effects of DNMT3AR882mut lead to CpG methylation decrease/loss, which is most likely to contribute to leukemogenesis. In agreement, CpG hypomethylation and not hypermethylation was detected as a major event in TF-1 cells and murine AML models carrying DNMT3AR882mut (12,24). Despite advances, exact molecular mechanism by DNMT3AR882mut induces CpG hypomethylation in cells remains to be fully understood. As well, since blood cells do not express DNMT3L (29), investigation of leukemia-related DNMT3Amut requires using physiologically relevant contexts such as homo-tetramers or oligomers of DNMT3A (18,21) or complexes of DNMT3A with DNMT3B (31,44,45) or other putative partners.

Additionally, TF-1 cells act as a system useful for modeling various other biological effects of DNMT3Amut. First, CpG hypomethylations induced by DNMT3AR882mut in TF-1 cells resemble those seen in leukemia patients with DNMT3AR882mut, suggesting a clinical relevance of findings from this model. Furthermore, there is a dose-dependent effect by DNMT3AR882mut on CpG hypomethylation and transformation (cytokine-free proliferation) in TF-1 cells, which provides an explanation for age-related increase in incidence of clonal hematopoiesis seen among elderly individuals. We observed synergy between DNMT3AR882mut and IDH1 mutation in TF-1 cells, as well as a phenomenon of ‘epigenetic antagonism’ that resembles what was seen in human AML cells carrying dual DNMT3AR882H and IDH2 mutations (42). Future investigation, however, is warranted to delineate interplays between DNMT3AR882mut and coexisting IDH mutations for inducing epigenomic alterations in both DNA methylation (including 5mC and 5hmC) and histone modifications. Lastly, missense mutations at non-R882 residues account for ~40–50% of DNMT3Amut in blood cancer and disorders. Considering many mutant forms for such a non-R882 category of DNMT3Amut, TF-1 cells shall provide a simple yet robust system for studying their biological effects as shown recently with several DNMT3Amut known to affect DNMT3A’s DNA-binding (12). Together, TF-1 cells represent a straightforward, robust and disease-relevant model system for investigating numerous unsolved issues relating DNMT3Amut.

This study not only demonstrated a requirement for the dominant-negative effect of DNMT3AR882mut (most likely to act in concert with a hypomorphic nature of DNMT3AR882mut) during leukemic transformation but also explored potential therapeutics. For the latter, our mechanistic studies suggest that intervention shall be developed for targeting events associated with DNMT3AR882mut-induced CpG hypomethylation. Here, we first used a transgene-reversible system to show that DNMT3AR882mut-induced TF-1 cell transformation relies on its continuous expression; as well, we find CpG hypomethylation correlated to transcriptional activation of LMO2, a leukemia-related oncogene, thereby providing a glimpse of how induced CpG hypomethylation influences gene expression in TF-1 cells. It is consistent to previous reports showing that sites with DNMT3AR882mut-induced CpG hypomethylation are enriched in cis-regulatory elements such as enhancers and display increased histone acetylation, which then recruits ‘reader’ protein complexes to potentiate gene activation (24,50). Besides DOT1L complexes (24,50), we here show that BRD4, another histone acetylation ‘reader’, also binds to DNMT3AR882H-associated gene targets (notably Mn1, Mycn and Bcl2) in murine AMLs and that pharmacological inhibition of BRD4 suppressed activation of DNMT3AR882H-related gene signatures. BRD4 inhibitors efficiently suppressed in vitro and in vivo growth of murine AMLs carrying dual DNMT3AR882mut and RAS mutations. Note that DNA methylation potentially regulates numerous biological processes including gene transcription, genome stability, chromatin architecture and looping, mRNA splicing, and silencing of repetitive DNA elements (46,47). Determination of putative effects of DNMT3AR882H-related CpG hypomethylation on these crucial processes warrants future investigation.

Supplementary Material

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Statement of Significance.

Findings highlight a model system to study the functional impact of a hotspot mutation DNMT3A R882 in leukemia

Acknowledgments

We thank UNC’s Genomics Core, Animal Studies Core, Flow Core, and HTSF core for their support of this work and the Wang lab for discussions. We are grateful for helps of Drs. Q Zhang, JA Losman and Y Xiong in providing reagents and cells used in the study. This work was supported by National Institute of Health grants (R01-CA215284, R01-CA218600 and R01-CA211336 to G.G.W.), a Kimmel Scholar Award (to G.G.W.), a US Army/DoD Career Development Award (W81XWH-14-1-0232; to G.G.W.), and grants of Concern Foundation for Cancer Research (to G.G.W.), Gabrielle’s Angel Foundation for Cancer Research (to G.G.W.), Gilead Sciences Research Scholars Program (to G.G.W.), and When Everyone Survives (WES) Leukemia Research Foundation (to G.G.W.). UNC Core is supported in part by the North Carolina Biotech Center Institutional Support Grant 2012-IDG-1006 and the UNC Cancer Center Core Support Grant P30-CA016086. R.L. and Z.R. supported by a Lymphoma Research Foundation postdoc fellowship and DoD Career Development Award nested postdoc fellowship (W81XWH-14-1-0232), respectively. G.G.W. is an American Society of Hematology (ASH) Scholar in basic research, an American Cancer Society (ACS) Research Scholar, and a Leukemia & Lymphoma Society (LLS) Scholar.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest disclosure statement: no potential conflicts of interest to disclose

References

  • 1.Chi P, Allis CD, Wang GG. Covalent histone modifications--miswritten, misinterpreted and mis-erased in human cancers. Nat Rev Cancer 2010;10(7):457–69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Shih AH, Abdel-Wahab O, Patel JP, Levine RL. The role of mutations in epigenetic regulators in myeloid malignancies. Nat Rev Cancer 2012;12(9):599–612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cancer Genome Atlas Research N, Ley TJ, Miller C, Ding L, Raphael BJ, Mungall AJ, et al. Genomic and epigenomic landscapes of adult de novo acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 2013;368(22):2059–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yan XJ, Xu J, Gu ZH, Pan CM, Lu G, Shen Y, et al. Exome sequencing identifies somatic mutations of DNA methyltransferase gene DNMT3A in acute monocytic leukemia. Nature genetics 2011;43(4):309–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ley TJ, Ding L, Walter MJ, McLellan MD, Lamprecht T, Larson DE, et al. DNMT3A mutations in acute myeloid leukemia. The New England journal of medicine 2010;363(25):2424–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Patel JP, Gonen M, Figueroa ME, Fernandez H, Sun Z, Racevskis J, et al. Prognostic relevance of integrated genetic profiling in acute myeloid leukemia. The New England journal of medicine 2012;366(12):1079–89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yang L, Rau R, Goodell MA. DNMT3A in haematological malignancies. Nat Rev Cancer 2015;15(3):152–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Genovese G, Kahler AK, Handsaker RE, Lindberg J, Rose SA, Bakhoum SF, et al. Clonal hematopoiesis and blood-cancer risk inferred from blood DNA sequence. The New England journal of medicine 2014;371(26):2477–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jaiswal S, Fontanillas P, Flannick J, Manning A, Grauman PV, Mar BG, et al. Age-related clonal hematopoiesis associated with adverse outcomes. The New England journal of medicine 2014;371(26):2488–98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Koeffler HP, Leong G. Preleukemia: one name, many meanings. Leukemia 2017;31(3):534–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ganguly BB, Kadam NN. Mutations of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS): An update. Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res 2016;769:47–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zhang ZM, Lu R, Wang P, Yu Y, Chen D, Gao L, et al. Structural basis for DNMT3A-mediated de novo DNA methylation. Nature 2018;554(7692):387–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jia D, Jurkowska RZ, Zhang X, Jeltsch A, Cheng X. Structure of Dnmt3a bound to Dnmt3L suggests a model for de novo DNA methylation. Nature 2007;449(7159):248–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Guo X, Wang L, Li J, Ding Z, Xiao J, Yin X, et al. Structural insight into autoinhibition and histone H3-induced activation of DNMT3A. Nature 2015;517(7536):640–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Dhayalan A, Rajavelu A, Rathert P, Tamas R, Jurkowska RZ, Ragozin S, et al. The Dnmt3a PWWP domain reads histone 3 lysine 36 trimethylation and guides DNA methylation. The Journal of biological chemistry 2010;285(34):26114–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Noh KM, Wang H, Kim HR, Wenderski W, Fang F, Li CH, et al. Engineering of a Histone-Recognition Domain in Dnmt3a Alters the Epigenetic Landscape and Phenotypic Features of Mouse ESCs. Molecular cell 2015;59(1):89–103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jeltsch A, Jurkowska RZ. Multimerization of the dnmt3a DNA methyltransferase and its functional implications. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci 2013;117:445–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Holz-Schietinger C, Matje DM, Harrison MF, Reich NO. Oligomerization of DNMT3A controls the mechanism of de novo DNA methylation. The Journal of biological chemistry 2011;286(48):41479–88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ren W, Gao L, Song J. Structural Basis of DNMT1 and DNMT3A-Mediated DNA Methylation. Genes (Basel) 2018;9(12). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Emperle M, Dukatz M, Kunert S, Holzer K, Rajavelu A, Jurkowska RZ, et al. The DNMT3A R882H mutation does not cause dominant negative effects in purified mixed DNMT3A/R882H complexes. Sci Rep 2018;8(1):13242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Jurkowska RZ, Rajavelu A, Anspach N, Urbanke C, Jankevicius G, Ragozin S, et al. Oligomerization and binding of the Dnmt3a DNA methyltransferase to parallel DNA molecules: heterochromatic localization and role of Dnmt3L. The Journal of biological chemistry 2011;286(27):24200–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kareta MS, Botello ZM, Ennis JJ, Chou C, Chedin F. Reconstitution and mechanism of the stimulation of de novo methylation by human DNMT3L. The Journal of biological chemistry 2006;281(36):25893–902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Brunetti L, Gundry MC, Goodell MA. DNMT3A in Leukemia. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2017;7(2). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lu R, Wang P, Parton T, Zhou Y, Chrysovergis K, Rockowitz S, et al. Epigenetic Perturbations by Arg882-Mutated DNMT3A Potentiate Aberrant Stem Cell Gene-Expression Program and Acute Leukemia Development. Cancer cell 2016;30(1):92–107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Guryanova OA, Shank K, Spitzer B, Luciani L, Koche RP, Garrett-Bakelman FE, et al. DNMT3A mutations promote anthracycline resistance in acute myeloid leukemia via impaired nucleosome remodeling. Nature medicine 2016;22(12):1488–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Meyer SE, Qin T, Muench DE, Masuda K, Venkatasubramanian M, Orr E, et al. DNMT3A Haploinsufficiency Transforms FLT3ITD Myeloproliferative Disease into a Rapid, Spontaneous, and Fully Penetrant Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Cancer Discov 2016;6(5):501–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chang YI, You X, Kong G, Ranheim EA, Wang J, Du J, et al. Loss of Dnmt3a and endogenous Kras(G12D/+) cooperate to regulate hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell functions in leukemogenesis. Leukemia 2015;29(9):1847–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Yang L, Rodriguez B, Mayle A, Park HJ, Lin X, Luo M, et al. DNMT3A Loss Drives Enhancer Hypomethylation in FLT3-ITD-Associated Leukemias. Cancer cell 2016;29(6):922–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Russler-Germain DA, Spencer DH, Young MA, Lamprecht TL, Miller CA, Fulton R, et al. The R882H DNMT3A mutation associated with AML dominantly inhibits wild-type DNMT3A by blocking its ability to form active tetramers. Cancer cell 2014;25(4):442–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Holz-Schietinger C, Matje DM, Reich NO. Mutations in DNA methyltransferase (DNMT3A) observed in acute myeloid leukemia patients disrupt processive methylation. The Journal of biological chemistry 2012;287(37):30941–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kim SJ, Zhao H, Hardikar S, Singh AK, Goodell MA, Chen T. A DNMT3A mutation common in AML exhibits dominant-negative effects in murine ES cells. Blood 2013;122(25):4086–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Emperle M, Rajavelu A, Kunert S, Arimondo PB, Reinhardt R, Jurkowska RZ, et al. The DNMT3A R882H mutant displays altered flanking sequence preferences. Nucleic acids research 2018;46(6):3130–39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Cai L, Rothbart SB, Lu R, Xu B, Chen WY, Tripathy A, et al. An H3K36 methylation-engaging Tudor motif of polycomb-like proteins mediates PRC2 complex targeting. Molecular cell 2013;49(3):571–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Aryee MJ, Jaffe AE, Corrada-Bravo H, Ladd-Acosta C, Feinberg AP, Hansen KD, et al. Minfi: a flexible and comprehensive Bioconductor package for the analysis of Infinium DNA methylation microarrays. Bioinformatics 2014;30(10):1363–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Cai L, Tsai YH, Wang P, Wang J, Li D, Fan H, et al. ZFX Mediates Non-canonical Oncogenic Functions of the Androgen Receptor Splice Variant 7 in Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer. Molecular cell 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Xu B, On DM, Ma A, Parton T, Konze KD, Pattenden SG, et al. Selective inhibition of EZH2 and EZH1 enzymatic activity by a small molecule suppresses MLL-rearranged leukemia. Blood 2015;125(2):346–57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wang GG, Cai L, Pasillas MP, Kamps MP. NUP98-NSD1 links H3K36 methylation to Hox-A gene activation and leukaemogenesis. Nature cell biology 2007;9(7):804–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Losman JA, Looper RE, Koivunen P, Lee S, Schneider RK, McMahon C, et al. (R)-2-hydroxyglutarate is sufficient to promote leukemogenesis and its effects are reversible. Science 2013;339(6127):1621–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kernytsky A, Wang F, Hansen E, Schalm S, Straley K, Gliser C, et al. IDH2 mutation-induced histone and DNA hypermethylation is progressively reversed by small-molecule inhibition. Blood 2015;125(2):296–303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ernst J, Kheradpour P, Mikkelsen TS, Shoresh N, Ward LD, Epstein CB, et al. Mapping and analysis of chromatin state dynamics in nine human cell types. Nature 2011;473(7345):43–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Yang L, Rodriguez B, Mayle A, Park HJ, Lin X, Luo M, et al. DNMT3A Loss Drives Enhancer Hypomethylation in FLT3-ITD-Associated Leukemias. Cancer Cell 2016;30(2):363–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Glass JL, Hassane D, Wouters BJ, Kunimoto H, Avellino R, Garrett-Bakelman FE, et al. Epigenetic Identity in AML Depends on Disruption of Nonpromoter Regulatory Elements and Is Affected by Antagonistic Effects of Mutations in Epigenetic Modifiers. Cancer Discov 2017;7(8):868–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Holz-Schietinger C, Reich NO. The inherent processivity of the human de novo methyltransferase 3A (DNMT3A) is enhanced by DNMT3L. The Journal of biological chemistry 2010;285(38):29091–100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Duymich CE, Charlet J, Yang X, Jones PA, Liang G. DNMT3B isoforms without catalytic activity stimulate gene body methylation as accessory proteins in somatic cells. Nat Commun 2016;7:11453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Gordon CA, Hartono SR, Chedin F. Inactive DNMT3B splice variants modulate de novo DNA methylation. PLoS ONE 2013;8(7):e69486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Jones PA. Functions of DNA methylation: islands, start sites, gene bodies and beyond. Nature reviews Genetics 2012;13(7):484–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Lev Maor G, Yearim A, Ast G. The alternative role of DNA methylation in splicing regulation. Trends Genet 2015;31(5):274–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.El Omari K, Hoosdally SJ, Tuladhar K, Karia D, Vyas P, Patient R, et al. Structure of the leukemia oncogene LMO2: implications for the assembly of a hematopoietic transcription factor complex. Blood 2011;117(7):2146–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Burgess MR, Hwang E, Firestone AJ, Huang T, Xu J, Zuber J, et al. Preclinical efficacy of MEK inhibition in Nras-mutant AML. Blood 2014;124(26):3947–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Rau RE, Rodriguez BA, Luo M, Jeong M, Rosen A, Rogers JH, et al. DOT1L as a therapeutic target for the treatment of DNMT3A-mutant acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 2016;128(7):971–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Data Availability Statement

The Genomics data produced by this study, including ChIP-Seq and methylome, have been deposited in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under accession code GEO: GSE130094, GSE130634 and GSE71475.

The details of experimental procedures are provided in Supplementary Materials and Methods.

RESOURCES