ABSTRACT
Primary eruption failure is a poorly understood condition in which the teeth fail to erupt in oral cavity in absence of any local or systemic factors. First and second molars are most commonly affected but one or more number of teeth, primary or permanent can be partially or completely affected. The orthodontic or surgical methods to get such teeth in occlusion have failed miserably. The early diagnosis of primary eruption failure (PEF) will allow the dentist to accurately rehabilitate the patient without wasting any time on treatments which are bound to fail.
How to cite this article
Shivakumar GC, Srivastava A, et al. Primary Failure of Eruption: A Cause of Posterior Open Bite. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2019;12(4):360–361.
Keywords: Anterior deep bite, Posterior open bite, Primary eruption failure, Retained deciduous teeth
INTRODUCTION
Normal eruption of teeth is of prime concern to the dentist as it affects the overall growth of maxillofacial structures. Eruption failure can be due to mechanical obstruction (which can be idiopathic or pathogenic), various environmental or genetic factors, or disruption of the eruption itself. Various pathologies such as cysts, other teeth, bone, and fibrous gingival can lead to a tooth not getting erupt in the oral cavity. The primary failure eruption (PFE) was first described by Proffit and Vig, in which nonankylosed teeth fail to erupt owing to malfunction of the eruption mechanism. The involved teeth erupt partially and then cease to erupt becoming submerged but not ankylosed. Mostly posterior teeth are affected, leading to a posterior open bite.1 The disease is commonly seen unilaterally but bilateral involvement has also been reported. The tooth affected by PFE is likely to become ankylosed when force is applied. The cause of PFE is still not clear, but genetic predisposition is often implicated. A definite diagnosis is not direct as it incorporates both primary and secondary retention; usually a diagnosis of PFE is made only when initial treatment modalities have failed.2 We hereby present a case of primary failure of eruption in which orthodontic treatment was planned.
CASE DESCRIPTION
A 17-year-old male patient was referred to the department by a private practitioner with the complaint of inability to chew from one side (Fig. 1). The practitioner wanted to correct his bite by orthodontic treatment and sent the patient to us for evaluation before starting the case. The clinical examination revealed a right-side posterior open bite (Fig. 2) with an anterior deep bite (Fig. 3), and multiple submerged teeth and retained 53, 54, 55 and 84. An orthopantomogram was advised, which showed submerged permanent molars and premolars on the right side in both maxillary and mandibular arches without any evidence of ankylosis (Fig. 4). Mechanical obstruction due to retained deciduous teeth was seen in relation to 53, 54, 55, and 84 region. After ruling out, local, systemic, and hormonal factors and considering the failure of eruption of the posterior teeth distal to the most mesially affected teeth, a diagnosis of PFE was made. The disorder was explained to the patient and the treating clinician. The orthodontic treatment was abandoned. The patient was advised to get the posterior open bite corrected prosthodontically with the help of crowns.
DISCUSSION
The prevalence of PFE is extremely low at about 0.06%.3 The etiology of PFE is not known. Genetic factors such as mutations in parathyroid hormone receptor 1 (PTH 1R) have often been implicated. Usually in such cases, the familial history may help in diagnosing the case, but in our case, no such familial history was reported. Diagnosis of PFE should always be made after ruling out mechanical failure of eruption (MFE), which may be due to retained deciduous teeth, supernumerary teeth, or fibrous gingiva.4 A key distinguishing feature between PFE and MFE is whether distal teeth are normal or affected.1 If distal teeth are affected, a diagnosis of PFE is made as was in our case. PFE affects the posterior dentition and is usually unilateral, but bilateral involvement is also reported and can affect either of the jaws, namely maxilla and mandible. The findings in our present case were in agreement with those of the Profit and Vig as well as Sofia et al., posterior dentition is most commonly affected.5 PFE may be of two types, one with total eruption failure6 and the second one with a slight eruption ceasing to erupt thereafter, which is called as secondary retention. Our case showed the secondary retention of PFE. Differential diagnosis of PFE may include cleidocranial dysplasia, osteopetrosis, and Rutherford syndrome, which have similar features as those of PFE.1
The management of PFE is very limited. Teeth with PFE are unresponsive to orthodontic force and ankylose when subjected to it. Prosthetic correction is the only viable treatment in such patients.1 Our patient was also advised to achieve occlusion through crown restoration. Surgical procedures such as distraction osteogenesis or segmental osteotomy have also been done in similar cases, but their use in routine practice is often limited owing to complication associated with such procedures.7
CONCLUSION
PFE is a rare disease in which nonankylosed teeth fail to erupt in the oral cavity in the absence of mechanical obstruction, resulting in posterior open bite. Diagnosis of PFE is difficult owing to its rare occurrence. The conventional orthodontic treatment is bound to fail as they result in ankylosis of the tooth. The situation should be explained to the patient and prosthetic or surgical correction should be provided. Dental surgeons encounter patients with noneruption of teeth quite often. This case highlights a possible diagnosis of PFE after all other associated etiologies have been ruled out. PFE demands a different approach to treatment when conventional treatment modalities such as orthodontic treatment fail. Hence, the knowledge about this disorder is necessary in formulating diagnosis and planning treatment for nonerupting or submerged teeth.
Footnotes
Source of support: Nil
Conflict of interest: None
REFERENCES
- 1.Frazier-Bowers SA, Koehler KE, et al. Primary failure of eruption: Further characterization of a rare eruption disorder. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 May;131(5):578.e1–578.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.09.038. DOI: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Proffit WR, Vig KW. Primary failure of eruption: A possible cause of posterior open-bite. Am J Orthod. 1981 Aug;80(2):173–190. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(81)90217-7. DOI: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Vijesh PK, Arun Kumar BR, et al. Primary Eruption Failure: A Review. Int J Appl Dent Sci. 2015;1(4):149–151. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Jain U, Kallury A, et al. Primary failure of eruption (PFE). BMJ Case Rep. 2015;2015:bcr2015209703. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2015-209703. DOI: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sofia A, Bister D, et al. The clinical features and aetiological basis of primary eruption failure. Eur J Orthod. 2006 Dec;28(6):535–540. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjl033. DOI: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Raghoebar GM, Boering G, et al. Eruption disturbances of permanent molars: a review. J Oral Pathol Med. 1991 Apr;20(4):159–166. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.1991.tb00913.x. DOI: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Raghoebar GM, Boering G, et al. Clinical, Radiographic And Histological Characteristics Of Secondary Retention Of Permanent Molars. J Dent. 1991 Jun;19(3):164–170. doi: 10.1016/0300-5712(91)90007-l. DOI: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]