Skip to main content
PeerJ logoLink to PeerJ
. 2019 Dec 4;7:e8073. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8073

A high latitude Devonian lungfish, from the Famennian of South Africa

Robert W Gess 1,2,3,#, Alice M Clement 4,✉,#
Editor: Claudia Marsicano
PMCID: PMC6898985  PMID: 31824758

Abstract

New fossil lungfish remains comprising two parasphenoids, tooth plates and scales from the Famennian Witpoort Formation of South Africa are described. From the parasphenoid material, which bears similarity to Oervigia and Sagenodus but is nevertheless unique, a new genus, Isityumzi mlomomde gen. et sp. nov. is erected. Tooth plates and scales from the same locality may be conspecific but are not yet assigned until further material becomes available. The tooth plates closely resemble those of some taxa in the Carboniferous genus Ctenodus. The new taxon is significant as only the second Devonian lungfish described from the African continent, and for hailing from the high-latitude (polar) Waterloo Farm environment situated close to 70° south during the Famennian.

Keywords: Waterloo farm, Witpoort formation, Dipnoi, Famennian, South Africa, Western Gondwana, Sarcopterygii, Palaeozoic

Introduction

Lungfish (Dipnoi) are a clade of sarcopterygian (lobe-finned) fishes with their origins stretching back to the Early Devonian, over 410 million years ago (Campbell & Barwick, 1983; Chang & Yu, 1984; Denison, 1968; Wang et al., 1993). They reached a peak of diversity and abundance throughout the Devonian with close to 100 species described from that time period (Clack, Sharp & Long, 2011; Marshall, 1986a).

The vast majority of described Devonian taxa hail from Laurussia, with Gondwanan and China block taxa contributing just over one third of known species. Of those, eight are known from China (Qiao & Zhu, 2015), but the Gondwanan lungfish are dominated by Australian taxa (Long & Trinajstic, 2018) with over 25 described species, leaving just two remaining taxa; Dipnotuberculus from Mid-Devonian Moroccan deposits (Campbell et al., 2002) and Iranorhynchus from the Late Devonian Arabian Plate (Janvier & Martin, 1978), although the dipnoan affinities of the latter taxon have since been questioned (Marshall, 1986b). An unnamed lungfish palate from the Frasnian deposits in the Maider Basin north-west of Fezzou in Morocco is mentioned in Murray (2000) and we believe this most likely to be Dipnotuberculus (Campbell et al., 2002). However, it is unclear why the precise stratigraphic ages differ between reports.

Whereas all other Devonian lungfish bearing sites originated in tropical to warm temperate conditions, the Waterloo Farm lagerstätte, situated within the Famennian-aged Witpoort Formation (Witteberg Group, Cape Supergroup) (Gess, 2016), provides a unique window into a high palaeolatitude (i.e. polar) fauna, situated at approximately 70° latitude (Torsvik & Cocks, 2011; Torsvik & Cocks, 2013) or possibly even further south (Scotese & McKerrow, 1990). Sporadic systematic excavation and collection over three decades has produced an unusually complete record of a Famennian ecosystem, in part resulting from the presence of exceptional soft tissue preservation of both vegetative (Gess & Hiller, 1995a) and animal (Gess, Coates & Rubidge, 2006) origin.

The vertebrate fauna includes the only two known species of Devonian high-latitude tetrapods, Tutusius and Umzantsia (Gess & Ahlberg, 2018), the fossil lamprey Priscomyzon riniensis (Gess, Coates & Rubidge, 2006) and several placoderms, including an antiarch placoderm, Bothriolepis africana, phlyctaniid arthrodire placoderms Groenlandaspis riniensis (Long et al., 1997), Africanaspis doryssa (Gess & Trinajstic, 2017; Long et al., 1997) and Africanaspis edmountaini (Gess & Trinajstic, 2017). The fauna also includes a diplacanthid acanthodian Diplacanthus acus (Gess, 2001), a gyracanthid acanthodian (Gess & Hiller, 1995b), chondrichthyans Plesioselachus acus (Anderson et al., 1999; Gess & Coates, 2015b) and Antarctilamna ultima (Gess & Coates, 2015b), actinoperygians (Gess & Coates, 2008), the coelacanth Serenichthys kowiensis (Gess & Coates, 2015a) and a tristichopterid close to Hyneria (Gess & Coates, 2008).

Aquatic invertebrates are dominated by hundreds of valves of a fresh to brackish water mussel, Naiadites form Devonica (Scholtz & Gess, 2017). Interpretation of the depositional environment as a back barrier coastal lagoonal estuary with fresh and marine influences (Gess & Hiller, 1995b) is supported by the abundant presence of both marine-type phaeophyte algae (Hiller & Gess, 1996) and fresh to brackish water indicative charophyte algae (Gess & Hiller, 1995a).

Despite its high latitude setting the climate does not seem to have been overly extreme; a complex adjacent terrestrial habitat included the progymnosperm tree, Archaeopteis notosaria (Anderson, Hiller & Gess, 1994, 1995) as well as rhizomorphic lycopods such as the widespread Leptophloem rhombicum (Gess & Hiller, 1995b; Prestianni & Gess, 2014) and the endemic Kowieria alveoformis (Gess & Prestianni, 2018). The terrestrial environment also supported invertebrate life such as the scorpion Gondwanascorpio umzantsiensis, the oldest known terrestrial animal from Gondwana (Gess, 2013).

Although not abundantly represented, the lungfish material we present below contributes to a better understanding of this unique high-latitude environment and provides the only record of Late Devonian lungfish remains from western Gondwana (South America and Africa).

Materials and Methods

All the material was collected from a single black metashale lens (the MFL or Main Fish Layer) at Waterloo Farm to the south of Makhanda/Grahamstown, Eastern Cape, South Africa, situated at 33°19′24.24″S, 26°32′13.39″E. This deposit is located within the upper portion of the predominantly arenaceous Witpoort Formation (Witteberg Group, Cape Supergroup), a formation corresponding to the Famennian stage of the Late Devonian (Gess, 2016). The black metashale is interpreted as a derivative of muds deposited in a back barrier estuarine environment (Gess & Hiller, 1995a).

Specimens were collected by Dr. Robert Gess between 1999 and 2017 from a large sample of shale rescued from roadworks during 1999, with the exception of AM7530 excavated in 2015 by Mr. Chris Harris from shale rescued by Dr. Gess in 1999 and AM4821 collected by Mrs. Sheila Coutouvides in 1989 (Gess & Hiller, 1995b).

All specimens are represented by near two-dimensional compressions preserved within black carbonaceous metashale. All organic material was replaced by secondary metamorphic mica during diagenesis, which has largely been replaced by kaolin and/or chlorite with uplift.

The described material comprises four blocks of part and counterpart, and one single block. The lungfish specimens are represented by a complete parasphenoid, a partial parasphenoid, two tooth plates associated with prearticulars and numerous scales. Specimens were studied using a binocular microscope and photographed using a Nikon D7500 with a Nikon 60 mm macro lens. Labelled line drawings were made both directly from the specimens and from photographs.

Results: systematic palaeontology

OSTEICHTHYES Huxley, 1880

SARCOPTERYGII Romer, 1955

DIPNOMORPHA Ahlberg, 1991

DIPNOI Müller, 1844

Isityumzi mlomomde gen. et sp. nov.

Diagnosis. Lungfish with parasphenoid corpus and stalk equal in length, stalk narrow with parallel sides tapering to a single point. Corpus almost as wide as long and with a broad anterior angle of 90°.

Etymology/Derivation of name. Generic name ‘Isityumzi’, from isiXhosa language meaning a device for crushing (from ukutyumza, to crush). Specific name ‘mlomomde’ from isiXhosa meaning ‘long mouthed’.

Holotype. Complete parasphenoid, AM6501, Albany Museum, Grahamstown/Makhanda, Eastern Cape, South Africa.

Other material. AM 4821 (partial parasphenoid).

Horizon and type locality. Waterloo Farm, Grahamstown/Makhanda, South Africa; Witpoort Formation, Witteberg Group, Famennian, Late Devonian.

Note. The new taxon is erected from the parasphenoid material alone. Although we expect that the tooth plate and scale material are conspecific, we do not formally assign them to Isityumzi mlomomde gen. et sp. nov. here.

The electronic version of this article in Portable Document Format will represent a published work according to the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN) and hence the new names contained in the electronic version are effectively published under that Code from the electronic edition alone. This published work and the nomenclatural acts it contains have been registered in ZooBank, the online registration system for the ICZN. The ZooBank Life Science Identifiers can be resolved and the associated information viewed through any standard web browser by appending the LSID to the prefix http://zoobank.org/. The LSID for this publication is: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0D8B5681-C4F6-43E3-A7E0-F2F9199AD1FC. The LSID for Isityumzi gen. nov. is urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:A2B074C1-12C3-4AE3-9F7F-26FA6B4DCBE7 and that for mlomomde sp. nov. is urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:9B17F871-21DB-4B64-9B72-EF54EF4934DF. The online version of this work is archived and available from the following digital repositories: PeerJ, PubMed Central and CLOCKSS.

Results: description

Parasphenoid. Two parasphenoids of Isityumzi mlomomde gen. et sp. nov. are preserved, the larger of which is incomplete and has previously been published (Anderson, Hiller & Gess, 1994; Gess & Hiller, 1995b). The description herein instead relies more heavily on the complete second specimen. The parasphenoid is a thin, flat element, not fused with the pterygoids but showing a clear area for overlap by these bones. There is a considerable size difference between the two specimens, with AM 4821 measuring 36 mm across the widest point and AM 6501 just 20 mm. The anterior section is wide (almost half the entire length) and the anterior angle is broad at 90°. The parasphenoid has a distinct broad rhombic anterior portion (corpus) and a narrow posterior shaft (stalk). The corpus and stalk are equilateral in length. The stalk is slender, has parallel sides and tapers to a single point posteriorly. The lateral angle between the stalk and the corpus is 30°. There is a long median ridge running anteroposteriorly, which carries a broad channel running the length of the stalk, although it is unclear if this lies on the dorsal or ventral surface. There is no dental material on the parasphenoid, nor is there any obvious indication of a buccohypophysial opening.

Parasphenoid: remarks. In overall proportions the parasphenoid of Isityumzi most closely resembles that of Oervigia (Lehman, 1959), although it lacks the bifid stalk of that taxon (Fig. 1). The stalk tapers into a single point posteriorly like Sagenodus (Schultze & Chorn, 1997) or Ctenodus (Sharp & Clack, 2013). The stalk is slender as in Oervigia (Lehman, 1959), but not quite as elongate as Andreyevichthys (Krupina, 1987, Fig. 2) and Sagenodus (Schultze & Chorn, 1997), being equal in length with the corpus. The stalk lacks lateral expansions seen in Soederberghia (Lehman, 1959), Ctenodus (Sharp & Clack, 2013) and Orlovichthys (Krupina, Reisz & Scott, 2001, Fig. 2). Unlike some other long-headed lungfish (Griphognathus, Miles, 1977, Fig. 75; Jarvikia and Soederberghia, Lehman, 1959, Figs. 24 and 29), the parasphenoid has a highly distinct rhombic corpus (‘lozenge’), which is sharply differentiated from a narrow posterior stalk. Isityumzi lacks an obvious buccohypophyseal opening as is found in older lungfish such as Dipterus (Jarvik, 1980, Fig. 307) and Dipnorhynchus (Campbell & Barwick, 2000, Fig. 1). However, a darkened area near the anterior angle of the parasphenoid may represent the ventral-most part of the hypophysial canal, like that in ‘Chirodipterus’ australis (Miles, 1977).

Figure 1. Palaeozoic Lungfish Parasphenoid Morphology.

Figure 1

Isityumzi mlomomde n. gen. et sp., (A) partial parasphenoid (AM 4821); (B) and (C) part and counterpart of the holotype (AM 6501a/b); (D) interpretive drawing of the holotype. Comparative parasphenoid outlines: (E) Oervigia nordica (Lehman, 1959, Fig. 27), (F) Soederberghia groenlandica (Lehman, 1959, Fig. 17), (G) Rhinodipterus kimberleyensis (Clement, 2012, Fig. 3), (H) Rhinodipterus secans (Gross, 1956, Fig. 20), (I) Ctenodus cristatus (Sharp & Clack, 2013, Fig. 16), (J) Sagenodus copeanus (Schultze & Chorn, 1997, Fig. 22), (K) Andreyevichthys epitomus (Krupina, 1987, Fig. 2), (L) Uranolophus (Denison, 1968, Fig. 8), (M) Chirodipterus australis (Miles, 1977, Fig. 76), (N) Holodipterus gogoensis (Miles, 1977, Fig. 77), (O) Griphognathus whitei (Miles, 1977, Fig. 75), (P) Gnathorhiza sp. (Berman, 1976, Fig. 4), and (Q) Eoctenodus microsoma (Long, 1987, Fig. 3). Parasphenoids not drawn to scale, redrawn from references given within.

Results: other lungfish material

Other material. AM 5863a/b (prearticular and partial tooth plate); AM7530a/b (prearticular and tooth plate); and AM 7531a/b, AM 7532 a/b, AM 7533 a/b, AM 7534, AM 7535, AM 7536, AM 7537 a/b/c (isolated scales).

Horizon and type locality. Waterloo Farm, Grahamstown/Makhanda, South Africa; Witpoort Formation, Witteberg Group, Famennian, Late Devonian.

Tooth plates. There are two tooth plates preserved, both with part and counterpart (Fig. 2). We do not herein formally assign them to Isityumzi mlomomde gen. et sp. nov. until further material becomes available to enable unambiguous identification. They are of the type containing radiating tooth rows with separate cusps and with part of the supporting bone attached. It is difficult to discern how many tooth rows were present on AM 5863, but WF-MFL preserves this detail better and shows at least eight (but possibly nine) tooth rows with at least six low cusps per row. The lateral-most cusp tends to be larger and isolated from the remainder of the ridge. The tooth rows curve posteriorly so that they diverge from a common point; the outermost rows curving the most to form the fan-shaped tooth plate. The angle between the first and last rows is 65°. Both tooth plates are attached to the supporting prearticular bone, although a groove (lingual furrow) is visible between them. It is not clear if the symphysial surface for contact with the opposing prearticular was broad or narrow. The prearticular bears straight mesial and posterior edges to form an obtuse triangle in outline. The cavity for the Meckelian bone may be represented by a darker patch central within the flange on AM 5863. The apparent outline of AM7530 measures ∼26 mm by ∼16 mm.

Figure 2. Other lungfish material.

Figure 2

(A) and (B) toothplates, (AM7530a/b); toothplates, (C) and (D) (AM 5863a/b); (E–H), interpretive drawings of (A–D); photographs of scales shown in (I–J) (AM 7531a/b) and (K) (AM 7537a). Scale bars all 10 mm.

Tooth plates: remarks. The preservation of material from Waterloo Farm is unusual. Across all vertebrate taxa dentine is not as well preserved as bone (which is itself often flattened) though, by contrast, cartilage is often well preserved. Impressions of the tooth plates do not therefore allow discernment as to whether or not the cusps were sharply-pointed as in Orlovichthys (Krupina, Reisz & Scott, 2001) and Oervigia (Lehman, 1959, Fig. 17A), nor whether they were strongly convex (cf. Smithson, Richards & Clack, 2015). The new tooth plates do not possess long anteromedial dentine extensions to the tooth plate like those in Orlovichthys (Krupina, Reisz & Scott, 2001), Rhinodipterus (Clement, 2012) and Andreyevichthys (Krupina, 1987). There is no evidence of a prominent ascending process on the prearticular, in contrast to Sinodipterus (Qiao & Zhu, 2009) although, as the material is flattened we can’t unequivocally rule this out. The tooth plates are not triangular in outline as is common in numerous Devonian taxa (e.g. Dipterus, White, 1965; Harajicadipterus, Clement, 2009; Sinodipterus, Qiao & Zhu, 2009; Adelargo, Johanson & Ritchie, 2000), nor ovoid (e.g. Eoctenodus, Long, 1987), but instead they are fan-shaped, more reminiscent of Ctenodus cristatus (Sharp & Clack, 2013, Fig. 1C), although possessing one less tooth row than that species. In fact the emended generic diagnosis for Ctenodus based as it is entirely on tooth plate morphology (Sharp & Clack, 2013), could apply to the tooth plates of this material. However, due to the difference between the parasphenoid of Isityumzi and those known from Ctenodus species, we have been cautious in not assigning the material to Ctenodus and thereby potentially erroneously distorting its temporal and biogeographic range. The similarity of the tooth plates to those of Ctenodus does however lend further support to the hypothesis that the Devonian-Carboniferous boundary was less rigid for lungfish than previously understood (Clack et al., 2018).

Squamation. Some thin, smooth cycloid lungfish body scales are also preserved (Fig. 2). The scales are sub-rounded tending towards subtriangular and appear to have had an ornament of small tuberosities/denticles. One of the largest examples, AM 7532, measures 50 mm across the major axis and 36 mm across minor axis. Due to the nature of preservation, it is unclear whether cosmine was present or not.

Discussion

Seemingly it wasn’t until the Mesozoic that lungfish began to diversify in Africa (e.g. Ceratodus spp., Ptychoceratodus, Mioceratodus, Asiatoceratodus) and by the Cretaceous Period they were widespread (Longrich, 2017; Murray, 2000). Indeed, one of the three living genera of lungfish (Protopterus) is thought to have existed in Africa for at least 100 million years (Otero, 2011). However, their Palaeozoic history has a depauperate record in Africa. Aside from the new taxon and material described herein, the only other undisputed Devonian lungfish from the continent is Dipnotuberculus, hailing from Morocco some ∼10,000 km away (Campbell et al., 2002). At this time Morocco would have been situated much closer to the equator in the temperate/sub-tropical zone (with a latitude between 30 and 60 degrees), whereas South Africa had a very high latitude location close to the South Pole (Scotese & McKerrow, 1990; Torsvik & Cocks, 2013).

The vast majority of described Devonian lungfish fossils are from subtropical and tropical locations much closer to the equator (including all of those from Australia, Laurussia and China). Tropical locations, in particular reefs, have long been recognised as centres of maximum diversity throughout geological history (Renema et al., 2008). Conversely, taxa living in high-latitude ‘polar’ regions (e.g. >60° in latitude) are in fact specifically investigated to understand the explicit physiological adaptations that enable them to survive in those extreme environments (Woodward, Rich & Vickers-Rich, 2018). Thus, quite significantly Isityumzi represents the first ever high-latitude lungfish known. Today, equivalent polar zones experience very low mean annual temperatures and months of extended winter darkness, which might contribute to the lack of lungfish at these sites.

Isityumzi joins several other Devonian genera in sharing a long skull morphology (e.g. Rhinodipterus, Andreyevichthys, Oervigia, Orlovichthys, Iowadipterus). In fact, possession of an elongate skull appears to completely dominate Upper Devonian lungfish morphologies across the globe, and particularly so during the Famennian (with perhaps Apatorhynchus the exception, see Friedman & Daeschler, 2006); short-snouted taxa such as the ‘chirodipterids’ had all but disappeared by this time.

It has long been noted that lungfish and tetrapods co-occur in Late Devonian deposits (Friedman & Daeschler, 2006; Lebedev, 2004; Thomson, 1980), most frequently in continental ecosystems. Of the 15 named Devonian tetrapod genera (Gess & Ahlberg, 2018; Olive et al., 2016), only four (Jakubsonia, Obruchevichthys, Sinostega and Weberepeton) do not co-occur with Soederberghia or some other long-headed lungfish (e.g. Andreyevichthys, Orlovichthys). In fact, it in only Jakubsonia that reportedly occurs with lungfish (Holodipterus, Dipterus, Conchodus), but not one of the long-headed forms.

Sharp & Clack (2013) suggested that lengthened skull roof E-bones in the Carboniferous lungfish Ctenodus could be related to increased strength of the rostral area to support the palate for a durophagous lifestyle. Perhaps it was the universal fixation of this feeding strategy that explains the widespread ‘long-headed, tooth-plated’ lungfish morphotype present during the Famennian. However, the short-snouted ‘chirodipterids’ common in the Frasnian possessed large, flat hypermineralised tooth plates and crania well-suited to high mechanical advantage likely even better suited to durophagy. This raises the possibility that the adoption of the common long-headed morphotype might have been related to another behaviour, possibly aerial respiration, as has been previously postulated (Ahlberg, Johanson & Daeschler, 2001; Campbell & Barwick, 1988; Clement, 2012; Clement & Long, 2010; Clement et al., 2016; Long, 1993; Thomson, 1971). The spread of long-headed lungfish in time and space closely associated with tetrapods that were also developing their own adaptations related to aerial respiration is likely salient and warrants further investigation.

Furthermore, it is notable that whereas most comparable environments contain abundant lungfish remains, these are extremely uncommon at Waterloo Farm. Out of approximately 400 vertebrate specimens (excluding scales) only four are attributable to lungfish. Considering the abundance of lungfish in contemporaneous Devonian deposits, and in the presence of hundreds of mussel shells this seems surprising.

A possible explanation is suggested by the exceptionally large size of the phlyctaeniid arthrodire Groenlandaspis riniensis, the largest species attributed to this genus (Long et al., 1997). For example, a large isolated anterior lateral plate of this species (AM6582) measures 150 mm along its spinal plate contact, suggesting a total length of head and trunk armour of 480 mm according to the proportions reconstructed by Long et al. (1997). This suggests a large fish with a total body length of approximately 1 m. The dentition of this species consists of supragnathals and infragnathals consistent with a durophagous lifestyle. It is therefore possible that Groenlandaspis riniensis, which represents the most commonly preserved vertebrate taxon at Waterloo Farm, inhibited abundance of other durophagous species, namely lungfishes.

Conclusions

  • Isityumzi represents the only record of Late Devonian lungfish remains from western Gondwana (South America and Africa) and is described from its parasphenoid.

  • The parasphenoid of Isityumzi bears similarity to Oervigia and Sagenodus but differs from those taxa in having a single pointed stalk (c.f. Oervigia) and the corpus and stalk being equal in length (c.f. Sagenodus).

  • The lungfish tooth plates from the same horizon and locality are similar to the Carboniferous taxon Ctenodus cristatus.

  • The new genus is the first Devonian lungfish described from a high-latitude environment, and the only lungfish known from the Witpoort Formation.

  • It appears likely that Isityumzi conforms to a common morphotype for Famennian lungfishes in possessing a long head and tooth plates bearing radiating ridges.

  • Isityumi adds further evidence for the co-occurrence of lungfish with tetrapod taxa.

  • It is possible that niche competition with the abundant and unusually large resident Groenlandaspis may account for the uncharacteristically low abundance of lungfish remains.

Acknowledgments

The South African National Roads Agency is thanked for their support in the rescue of shale during roadworks and construction of storage sheds therefore. Alice Clement thanks Chris Harris for assistance with photography setup and Rob Gess acknowledges his assistance with excavation of shales. Bulelwa Nosilela (Department of African Languages, Rhodes University) advised on taxonomic names. The authors thank Tom Challands and Timothy Smithson for their constructive reviews of an earlier version of this manuscript.

Funding Statement

Rob Gess received research support from the South African DST-NRF Centre of Excellence in Palaeosciences (CoE in Palaeosciences) and support by the South African MillenniumTrust. The South African National Roads Agency supported the rescue of shale during roadworks and construction of storage sheds. The travel required for this research was made possible by funding from the Flinders University (Adelaide, Australia) Vice-Chancellor’s Early Career Researcher Award, conferred to Alice Clement. Alice Clement received support from the Australia Research Council Discovery Grant (DP 160102460). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Additional Information and Declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Robert W. Gess conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analysed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Alice M. Clement performed the experiments, analysed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Data Availability

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

All photographs of the specimens are available at CLEMENT, Alice; Gess, Rob (2019): Specimen PHOTOS. figshare. Figure. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.9162227.v1.

All fossil material is deposited in public collections at the Albany Museum, Grahamstown, Eastern Cape, South Africa. The Holotype is desinated as AM6501, complete parasphenoid.

Other material. The specimens include AM 4821 (partial parasphenoid); AM 5863a/b (prearticular and partial tooth plate); AM 6500a/b (partial skull roof); AM 6501a/b (complete parasphenoid); AM7530a/b (prearticular and tooth plate); and AM 7531a/b, AM 7532 a/b, AM 7533 a/b, AM 7534, AM 7535, AM 7536, AM 7537 a/b/c (isolated scales).

New Species Registration

The following information was supplied regarding the registration of a newly described species:

Publication LSID: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0D8B5681-C4F6-43E3-A7E0-F2F9199AD1FC.

Isityumzi gen. nov. LSID: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:A2B074C1-12C3-4AE3-9F7F-26FA6B4DCBE7.

mlomomde sp. nov. LSID: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:9B17F871-21DB-4B64-9B72-EF54EF4934DF.

References

  • Ahlberg (1991).Ahlberg PE. A re-examination of sarcopterygian interrelationships, with special reference to Porolepiformes. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 1991;103(3):241–287. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.1991.tb00905.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Ahlberg, Johanson & Daeschler (2001).Ahlberg PE, Johanson Z, Daeschler EB. The late Devonian lungfish Soederberghia (Sarcopterygii, Dipnoi) from Australia and North America, and its biogeographical implications. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 2001;21(1):1–12. doi: 10.1671/0272-4634(2001)021[0001:TLDLSS]2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Anderson, Hiller & Gess (1994).Anderson ME, Hiller N, Gess RW. The first Bothriolepis-associated Devonian fish fauna from Africa. South African Journal of Science. 1994;90(7):397–403. [Google Scholar]
  • Anderson, Hiller & Gess (1995).Anderson HM, Hiller N, Gess RW. Archaeopteris (Progymnospermopsida) from the Devonian of southern Africa. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 1995;117(4):305–320. [Google Scholar]
  • Anderson et al. (1999).Anderson ME, Long JA, Gess RW, Hiller N. An unusual new fossil shark (Pisces: Chondrichthyes) from the late Devonian of South Africa. Records of the Western Australian Museum. 1999;57:151–156. [Google Scholar]
  • Berman (1976).Berman DS. Cranial morphology of the Lower Permian lungfish Gnathorhiza (Osteichthyes: Dipnoi) Journal of Paleontology. 1976;50:1020–1033. [Google Scholar]
  • Campbell & Barwick (1983).Campbell KSW, Barwick RE. Early evolution of Dipnoan dentitions and a new genus Speonesydrion. Memoirs of the Association of Australasian Palaeontologists. 1983;1:17–49. [Google Scholar]
  • Campbell & Barwick (1988).Campbell KSW, Barwick RE. Geological and palaeontological information and phylogenetic hypotheses. Geological Magazine. 1988;125(3):207–227. doi: 10.1017/S0016756800010165. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Campbell & Barwick (2000).Campbell KSW, Barwick RE. The braincase, mandible and dental structures of the Early Devonian lungfish Dipnorhynchus kurikae from Wee Jasper, New South Wales. Records of the Australian Museum. 2000;52(1):103–128. doi: 10.3853/j.0067-1975.52.2000.1309. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Campbell et al. (2002).Campbell KSW, Barwick RE, Chatterton BDE, Smithson TR. A new middle Devonian dipnoan from Morocco: structure and histology of dental plates. Records of the Western Australian Museum. 2002;21(1):39–61. doi: 10.18195/issn.0312-3162.21(1).2002.039-061. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Chang & Yu (1984).Chang MM, Yu X. Structure and phylogenetic significance of Diabolichthys speratus gen. et sp. nov., a new dipnoan-like form from the lower Devonian of eastern Yunnan. China Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales. 1984;107:171–184. [Google Scholar]
  • Clack et al. (2018).Clack JA, Challands TJ, Smithson TR, Smithson KZ. Newly recognized Famennian lungfishes from East Greenland reveal tooth plate diversity and blur the Devonian-Carboniferous boundary. Papers in Palaeontology. 2018;5(2):261–279. doi: 10.1002/spp2.1242. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Clack, Sharp & Long (2011).Clack JA, Sharp EL, Long JA. The fossil record of lungfishes. In: Jørgensen JM, Joss J, editors. The Biology of Lungfishes. Enfield: Science Publishers; 2011. pp. 1–42. [Google Scholar]
  • Clement (2009).Clement AM. A new genus of lungfish from the Givetian (Middle Devonian) of central Australia. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica. 2009;54(4):615–626. doi: 10.4202/app.2008.0057. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Clement (2012).Clement AM. A new species of long-snouted lungfish from the Late Devonian of Australia, and its functional and biogeographical implications. Palaeontology. 2012;55(1):51–71. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4983.2011.01118.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Clement & Long (2010).Clement AM, Long JA. Air-breathing adaptation in a marine Devonian lungfish. Biology Letters. 2010;6(4):509–512. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2009.1033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Clement et al. (2016).Clement AM, Long JA, Tafforeau P, Ahlberg PE. The dipnoan buccal pump reconstructed in 3D and implications for air breathing in Devonian lungfishes. Paleobiology. 2016;42(2):289–304. doi: 10.1017/pab.2015.41. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Denison (1968).Denison RH. The evolutionary significance of the earliest known lungfish, Uranolophus. In: Orvig T, editor. Current Problems in Lower Vertebrate Phylogeny, Nobel Symposium. Vol. 4. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell; 1968. pp. 247–257. [Google Scholar]
  • Friedman & Daeschler (2006).Friedman M, Daeschler EB. Late Devonian (Famennian) lungfishes from the Catskill formation of Pennsylvania, USA. Palaeontology. 2006;49(6):1167–1183. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4983.2006.00594.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Gess (2001).Gess RW. A new species of Diplacanthus from the Late Devonian (Famennian) of South Africa. Annales De Paleontologie. 2001;87(1):49–60. doi: 10.1016/S0753-3969(01)88002-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Gess (2013).Gess RW. The earliest record of terrestrial animals in Gondwana: a scorpion from the Famennian (Late Devonian) Witpoort formation of South Africa. African Invertebrates. 2013;54(2):373–379. doi: 10.5733/afin.054.0206. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Gess (2016).Gess RW. Vertebrate biostratigraphy of the Witteberg Group and the Devonian Carboniferous boundary in South Africa. In: Linol B, De Wit MJ, editors. The Origin and Evolution of the Cape Mountains and Karoo. Basin: Springer; 2016. pp. 131–140. [Google Scholar]
  • Gess & Ahlberg (2018).Gess R, Ahlberg PE. A tetrapod fauna from within the Devonian Antarctic Circle. Science. 2018;360(6393):1120–1124. doi: 10.1126/science.aaq1645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gess & Coates (2008).Gess RW, Coates MI. Vertebrate diversity of the Late Devonian (Famennian) deposit near Grahamstown, South Africa. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 2008;28:83. [Google Scholar]
  • Gess & Coates (2015a).Gess RW, Coates MI. Fossil juvenile coelacanths from the Devonian of South Africa shed light on the order of character acquisition in actinistians. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 2015a;175(2):360–383. doi: 10.1111/zoj.12276. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Gess & Coates (2015b).Gess RW, Coates MI. High latitude Chondrichthyans from the Late Devonian (Famennian) Witpoort formation of South Africa. Palaeontologische Zeitschrift. 2015b;89(2):147–169. doi: 10.1007/s12542-014-0221-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Gess, Coates & Rubidge (2006).Gess RW, Coates MI, Rubidge BS. A lamprey from the Devonian period of South Africa. Nature. 2006;443(7114):981–984. doi: 10.1038/nature05150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gess & Hiller (1995a).Gess RW, Hiller N. Late Devonian charophytes from the Witteberg Group, South Africa. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology. 1995a;89(3–4):417–428. doi: 10.1016/0034-6667(95)00007-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Gess & Hiller (1995b).Gess RW, Hiller N. A preliminary catalogue of fossil algal, plant, arthropod, and fish remains from a Late Devonian black shale near Grahamstown, South Africa. Annals of the Cape Provincial Museums (Natural History) 1995b;19:225–304. [Google Scholar]
  • Gess & Prestianni (2018).Gess RW, Prestianni C. Kowieria alveoformis gen. nov. sp. nov., a new heterosporous lycophyte from the Latest Devonian of Southern Africa. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology. 2018;249:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2017.10.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Gess & Trinajstic (2017).Gess RW, Trinajstic KM. New morphological information on, and species of placoderm fish Africanaspis (Arthrodira, Placodermi) from the Late Devonian of South Africa. PLOS ONE. 2017;12(4):e0173169. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gross (1956).Gross W. Über Crossopterygier und Dipnoer aus dem baltischen Oberdevon im Zusammenhang einer vergleichenden Untersuchung des Porenkanalsystems paläozoischer Agnathen und Fische. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell; 1956. [Google Scholar]
  • Hiller & Gess (1996).Hiller N, Gess RW. Marine algal remains from the upper Devonian of South Africa. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology. 1996;91(1–4):143–149. doi: 10.1016/0034-6667(95)00062-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Huxley (1880).Huxley TH. On the applications of the laws of evolution to the arrangement of the vertebrata and more particularly of the Mammalia. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London. 1880;1888:649–662. [Google Scholar]
  • Janvier & Martin (1978).Janvier P, Martin M. Les vertébrés dévoniens de l’Iran central I: dipneustes. Geobios. 1978;11(6):819–833. doi: 10.1016/S0016-6995(78)80099-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Jarvik (1980).Jarvik E. Basic structure and evolution of vertebrates. London: Academic Press; 1980. [Google Scholar]
  • Johanson & Ritchie (2000).Johanson Z, Ritchie A. A new Late Famennian lungfish from New South Wales, Australia, and its bearing on Australian–Asian terrane relations. Alcheringa: An Australasian Journal of Palaeontology. 2000;24(2):99–118. doi: 10.1080/03115510008619527. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Krupina (1987).Krupina NI. A new dipnoan fish from the upper Devonian of the Tula Region. Journal of Paleontology. 1987;3:40–47. [Google Scholar]
  • Krupina, Reisz & Scott (2001).Krupina NI, Reisz RR, Scott D. The skull and tooth system of Orlovichthys limnatis, a Late Devonian dipnoan from Russia. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences. 2001;38(9):1301–1311. doi: 10.1139/e01-028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Lebedev (2004).Lebedev OA. A new tetrapod Jakubsonia livnensis from the Early Famennian (Devonian) of Russia and palaeoecological remarks on the Late Devonian tetrapod habitats. Acta Universitatis Latviensis. 2004;679:79–98. [Google Scholar]
  • Lehman (1959).Lehman HP. Les Dipneustes du Dévonien supérieur du Groenland. Vol. 160. Copenhagen: Reitzels Forlag; 1959. pp. 1–58. [Google Scholar]
  • Long (1987).Long JA. A redescription of the lungfish Eoctenodus Hills 1929, with reassessment of other Australian records of the genus Dipterus Sedgwick & Murchison 1828. Records of the Western Australian Museum. 1987;13:297–314. [Google Scholar]
  • Long (1993).Long JA. Cranial ribs in Devonian lungfishes and the origin of dipnoan air-breathing. Memoirs of the Association of Australasian Palaeontologists. 1993;15:199–209. [Google Scholar]
  • Long et al. (1997).Long JA, Anderson ME, Gess RW, Hiller N. New Placoderm fishes from the Late Devonian of South Africa. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 1997;17(2):253–268. doi: 10.1080/02724634.1997.10010973. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Long & Trinajstic (2018).Long JA, Trinajstic KM. A review of recent discoveries of exceptionally preserved fossil fishes from the Gogo sites (Late Devonian, Western Australia) Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. 2018;108(1):111–117. doi: 10.1017/S1755691018000178. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Longrich (2017).Longrich NR. A stem lepidosireniform lungfish (Sarcopterygia: Dipnoi) from the upper Eocene of Libya, North Africa and implications for Cenozoic lungfish evolution. Gondwana Research. 2017;42:140–150. doi: 10.1016/j.gr.2016.09.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Marshall (1986a).Marshall CR. A list of fossil and extant Dipnoans. Journal of Morphology Supplement. 1986a;190(S1):15–23. doi: 10.1002/jmor.1051900405. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Marshall (1986b).Marshall CR. Lungfish: phylogeny and parsimony. Journal of Morphology. 1986b;190(S1):151–162. doi: 10.1002/jmor.1051900411. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Miles (1977).Miles RS. Dipnoan (lungfish) skulls and the relationships of the group: a study based on new species from the Devonian of Australia. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 1977;61(1–3):1–328. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.1977.tb01031.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Murray (2000).Murray AM. The palaeozoic, mesozoic and early Cenozoic fishes of Africa. Fish and Fisheries. 2000;1(2):111–145. doi: 10.1046/j.1467-2979.2000.00015.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Müller (1844).Müller J. Uber den Bau und die Grenzen der Ganoiden, and uber das naturliche System der Fische. Berlin: Abhandlungen der Koniglichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu; 1844. pp. 117–216. [Google Scholar]
  • Olive et al. (2016).Olive S, Ahlberg PE, Pernegre VN, Poty E, Steurbaut E, Clément G. New discoveries of tetrapods (ichthyostegid-like and whatcheeriid-like) in the Famennian (Late Devonian) localities of Strud and Becco (Belgium) Palaeontology. 2016;59(6):827–840. doi: 10.1111/pala.12261. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Otero (2011).Otero O. Current knowledge and new assumptions on the evolutionary history of the African lungfish, Protopterus, based on a review of its fossil record. Fish and Fisheries. 2011;12(3):235–255. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-2979.2010.00389.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Prestianni & Gess (2014).Prestianni C, Gess RW. The rooting system of Leptophloeum Dawson: new material from the upper Devonian, Famennian Witpoort formation of South Africa. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology. 2014;209:35–40. doi: 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2014.05.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Qiao & Zhu (2009).Qiao T, Zhu M. A new tooth-plated lungfish from the Middle Devonian of Yunnan, China, and its phylogenetic relationships. Acta Zoologica. 2009;90:236–252. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-6395.2008.00381.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Qiao & Zhu (2015).Qiao T, Zhu M. A new early Devonian lungfish from Guangxi, China, and its palaeogeographic significance. Alcheringa. 2015;39(3):428–437. doi: 10.1080/03115518.2015.1015819. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Renema et al. (2008).Renema W, Bellwood DR, Braga JC, Bromfield K, Hall R, Johnson KG, Lunt P, Meyer CP, McMonagle LB, Morley RJ, O’Dea A, Todd JA, Wesselingh FP, Wilson MEJ, Pandolfi JM. Hopping hotspots: global shifts in marine biodiversity. Science. 2008;321(5889):654–657. doi: 10.1126/science.1155674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Romer (1955).Romer AS. Herpetichthyes, amphibioidei, choanichthyes or Sarcopterygii? Nature. 1955;176(4472):126–127. doi: 10.1038/176126a0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Scholtz & Gess (2017).Scholtz S, Gess RW. Oldest known naiaditid bivalve from the high-latitude Late Devonian (Famennian) of South Africa offers clues to survival strategies following the Hangenberg mass extinction. Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology. 2017;471:31–39. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2017.01.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Schultze & Chorn (1997).Schultze H-P, Chorn J. The permo-carboniferous genus Sagenodus and the beginning of modern lungfish. Contributions to Zoology. 1997;67(1):9–70. doi: 10.1163/18759866-06701002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Scotese & McKerrow (1990).Scotese CR, McKerrow WS. Revised world maps and introduction. In: McKerrow WS, Scotese CR, editors. Palaeozoic Palaeogeography and Biogeography. Vol. 12. London: Geological Society of London Memoir; 1990. pp. 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  • Sharp & Clack (2013).Sharp EL, Clack JA. A review of the Carboniferous lungfish genus Ctenodus Agassiz, 1838 from the United Kingdom, with new data from an articulated specimen of Ctenodus interruptus Barkas, 1869. Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. 2013;104(2):169–204. doi: 10.1017/S1755691013000479. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Smithson, Richards & Clack (2015).Smithson TR, Richards KR, Clack JA. Lungfish diversity in Romer’s Gap: reaction to the end-Devonian extinction. Palaeontology. 2015;59(1):29–44. doi: 10.1111/pala.12203. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Thomson (1971).Thomson KS. The adaptation and evolution of early fishes. Quarterly Review of Biology. 1971;46(2):139–166. doi: 10.1086/406831. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Thomson (1980).Thomson KS. The ecology of Devonian lobe-finned fishes. In: Panchen AL, editor. The Terrestrial Environment and the Origin of Land Vertebrates. London: Academic Press; 1980. pp. 187–222. [Google Scholar]
  • Torsvik & Cocks (2011).Torsvik TH, Cocks LRM. The Palaeozoic palaeogeography of central Gondwana. In: Van Hinsbergen DJJ, Buiter SJH, Torsvik TH, Gaina C, Webb SJ, editors. The Formation and Evolution of Africa: A Synopsis of 38 Ga of Earth History. London: Geological Society; 2011. pp. 137–166. [Google Scholar]
  • Torsvik & Cocks (2013).Torsvik TH, Cocks LRM. Gondwana from top to base in space and time. Gondwana Research. 2013;24(3–4):999–1030. doi: 10.1016/j.gr.2013.06.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Wang et al. (1993).Wang S, Drapala V, Barwick RE, Campbell KSW. The dipnoan species, Sorbitorhynchus deleaskitus, from the Lower Devonian of Guangxi, China. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences. 1993;340(1291):1–24. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1993.0045. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • White (1965).White E. The head of Dipterus valenciennesi. Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History (Geology) 1965;11:1–45. [Google Scholar]
  • Woodward, Rich & Vickers-Rich (2018).Woodward HN, Rich TH, Vickers-Rich P. The bone microstructure of polar hypsilophodontid dinosaurs from Victoria, Australia. Scientific Reports. 2018;8(1):56. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17765-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

All photographs of the specimens are available at CLEMENT, Alice; Gess, Rob (2019): Specimen PHOTOS. figshare. Figure. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.9162227.v1.

All fossil material is deposited in public collections at the Albany Museum, Grahamstown, Eastern Cape, South Africa. The Holotype is desinated as AM6501, complete parasphenoid.

Other material. The specimens include AM 4821 (partial parasphenoid); AM 5863a/b (prearticular and partial tooth plate); AM 6500a/b (partial skull roof); AM 6501a/b (complete parasphenoid); AM7530a/b (prearticular and tooth plate); and AM 7531a/b, AM 7532 a/b, AM 7533 a/b, AM 7534, AM 7535, AM 7536, AM 7537 a/b/c (isolated scales).


Articles from PeerJ are provided here courtesy of PeerJ, Inc

RESOURCES