Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
letter
. 2019 Jul 15;96(4):376–377. doi: 10.1111/cge.13599

Bioinformatic detection of copy number variation in HNF4A causing maturity onset diabetes of the young

Amanda J Berberich 1,, Arati Mokashi 2, Adam D McIntyre 1, John F Robinson 1, Henian Cao 1, Jian Wang 1, Robert A Hegele 1
PMCID: PMC6899894  PMID: 31309534

Abstract

graphic file with name CGE-96-376-g002.jpg

1.

To the Editor:

Maturity onset diabetes of the young (MODY)1, 2 is currently under‐recognized clinically,3 and may also be under‐recognized by molecular genetic analysis.1 Genetic testing for MODY is presently accomplished primarily using next generation sequencing (NGS) techniques.1, 2, 4 However, these techniques are historically unable to detect copy number variations (CNVs), defined as large‐scale deletions or duplications in genomic DNA. We report here on a large‐scale heterozygous CNV in HNF4A causing MODY in an individual who initially tested negative for mutations by DNA sequencing alone.

The proband carrying this mutation was a Caucasian female, diagnosed with diabetes at age 16. She has a normal body mass index with negative diabetes‐associated autoantibodies and a significant family history of diabetes. She was managed effectively with a sulphonylurea for several years, with improvement in HbA1c from 7.5% to 5.6% compared to multiple daily injections of insulin. Sulphonylurea therapy eventually became ineffective and insulin was re‐initiated.

The proband provided informed consent and DNA was obtained from whole blood in 2005 under a protocol approved by the University of Western Ontario Ethics Review Board (#07920E). LipidSeq,5 a targeted NGS and bioinformatics platform, was used to assess for pathologic mutations in known MODY‐associated genes, and none were detected. Her original NGS output data was recently re‐analyzed 13 years after the original testing was completed using the VS‐CNV caller function in VarSeq v1.4.3 (Golden Helix, Bozeman, Montana), a technique that takes advantage of depth‐of‐coverage (DOC) information provided from raw NGS data to predict the presence of CNVs. A whole‐gene deletion of HNF4A (MODY1) was detected (Figure 1B). The CNV average ratio for this deletion was 0.531123 with a Z‐score of −6.6691 (significance threshold −5) for the targeted NGS data and an average ratio of 0.577031 with a Z‐score of −2.94078 (significance threshold −2) and a P‐value of <1 × 10−30 for confirmatory whole exome sequencing (WES). This deletion has not been previously reported and would be expected to be causal for MODY.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Confirmation of copy number variation (CNV) detection using NGS output data in HNF4A. A, CytoScan genotyping output showing loss of zygosity on chromosome 20q13, with reduced intensity of probe signals, expanded in panel B. C, Corresponding region with the same deletion detected using depth‐of‐coverage analysis from next generation sequencing (NGS) and whole exome sequencing (WES) output data. D,The genes that map within the deleted region, including the entire HNF4A gene. E, Sanger sequencing electropherogram tracings that demonstrate normal DNA sequences in the vicinity of the proximal 3′ (left side) and distal 5′ (right side) breakpoints of the deletion. Missing internal sequence from the deleted allele is shaded gray. In the bottom center is the Sanger sequencing electropherogram tracing from the proband, showing the deletion junction, with absence of the intervening 242 258 nucleotides. Amplification primer locations are indicated in panel C. Primer design and reaction conditions are available upon request [Colour figure can be viewed at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com]

The detected CNV was further confirmed using CytoScan array (Affymetrix Santa Clara, California), a clinically validated tool to detect CNVs, which similarly demonstrated a large‐scale deletion spanning this region (Figure 1A). The breakpoint was established using polymerase chain reaction (PCR)‐based probe analysis and Sanger sequencing using primers designed to target either side of the suspected breakpoint. This confirmed the presence of a heterozygous 242 258 bp deletion spanning chr20:42871409‐43 113 666 (Figures 1C‐E).

A diagnosis of MODY1, seen here, leads to a mild‐moderately severe, progressive form of diabetes.3 As demonstrated by the proband, MODY1 may be optimally treated with low‐dose oral sulfonylurea therapy for many years, although insulin therapy may eventually be required.4 Our findings suggest that incorporating CNV analysis routinely during genetic testing for MODY may improve diagnostic yield and may also help establish the true prevalence of CNVs as a cause of MODY.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

A.J.B. (guarantor) is supported through the Dr. Fernand Labrie Fellowship Research Grant from the Canadian Society for Endocrinology and Metabolism. R.A.H. is supported by the Jacob J. Wolfe Distinguished Medical Research Chair, the Edith Schulich Vinet Research Chair in Human Genetics, and the Martha G. Blackburn Chair in Cardiovascular Research. R.A.H. has also received operating grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Foundation award) and the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario (G‐18‐0022147).

Peer Review The peer review history for this article is available at https://publons.com/publon/10.1111/cge.13599.

Funding information Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, Grant/Award Number: G‐18‐0022147; Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario, Grant/Award Number: G‐18‐0022147; Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Grant/Award Number: Foundation Award; Martha G. Blackburn Chair in Cardiovascular Research; Edith Schulich Vinet Research Chair in Human Genetics; Jacob J. Wolfe Distinguished Medical Research Chair; Canadian Society for Endocrinology and Metabolism, Grant/Award Number: Dr. Fernand Labrie Fellowship Research Grant

DATA ACCESSIBILITY

There is no associated shared data.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Althari S, Gloyn AL. When is it MODY? Challenges in the interpretation of sequence variants in MODY genes. Rev Diabet Stud. 2015;12(3–4):330‐348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Hattersley AT. Maturity‐onset diabetes of the young: clinical heterogeneity explained by genetic heterogeneity. Diabet Med. 1998;15(1):15‐24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Pihoker C, Gilliam LK, Ellard S, et al. Prevalence, characteristics and clinical diagnosis of maturity +onset diabetes of the young due to mutations in HNF1A, HNF4A, and glucokinase: results from the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(10):4055‐4062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Brahm AJ, Wang G, Wang J, et al. Genetic confirmation rate in clinically suspected maturity‐onset diabetes of the young. Can J Diabetes. 2016;40(6):555‐560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Johansen CT, Dube JB, Loyzer MN, et al. LipidSeq: a next‐generation clinical resequencing panel for monogenic dyslipidemias. J Lipid Res. 2014;55(4):765‐772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

There is no associated shared data.


Articles from Clinical Genetics are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES