Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2019 Nov 6;58(49):17558–17562. doi: 10.1002/anie.201911637

A Novel Metastable Pentavalent Plutonium Solid Phase on the Pathway from Aqueous Plutonium(VI) to PuO2 Nanoparticles

Kristina O Kvashnina 1,2,, Anna Yu Romanchuk 3, Ivan Pidchenko 1,2, Lucia Amidani 1,2, Evgeny Gerber 1,2,3, Alexander Trigub 4, Andre Rossberg 1,2, Stephan Weiss 2, Karin Popa 5, Olaf Walter 5, Roberto Caciuffo 5, Andreas C Scheinost 1,2, Sergei M Butorin 6, Stepan N Kalmykov 3,4
PMCID: PMC6900038  PMID: 31621992

Abstract

Here we provide evidence that the formation of PuO2 nanoparticles from oxidized PuVI under alkaline conditions proceeds through the formation of an intermediate PuV solid phase, similar to NH4PuO2CO3, which is stable over a period of several months. For the first time, state‐of‐the‐art experiments at Pu M4 and at L3 absorption edges combined with theoretical calculations unambiguously allow to determine the oxidation state and the local structure of this intermediate phase.

Keywords: actinide chemistry, electronic-structure calculations, pentavalent plutonium, plutonium dioxide nanoparticles, Pu M4 HERFD


Solid proof: The formation of a novel pentavalent plutonium solid phase was observed on the pathway from aqueous PuVI to PuO2 nanoparticles by applying a high energy resolution fluorescence detection method at the Pu M4 and L3 edges and electronic structure calculations.

graphic file with name ANIE-58-17558-g004.jpg


Plutonium plays a prominent role in nuclear energy production but nuclear accidents and nuclear weapons tests have led to the release of Pu and other hazardous isotopes into the environment in the past, and Pu contamination has been detected in waters and soils.1 Based on such cases, several countries decided to shut down the operation of the oldest nuclear facilities and put effort into improving the safety of nuclear waste storage in order to prevent further release of radioactive nuclides into the environment. To progress in this direction, it is fundamental to deepen our basic knowledge of the chemistry of actinides in environmentally relevant conditions by making compounds, characterizing them, and understand them experimentally and theoretically. Thanks to the increased experimental sensitivity, recent cross‐activities between theory and experiment, and different synthetic approaches, such a goal becomes reachable.

In spite of the low solubility of the most prevalent environmental species, Pu has been shown to be transported by groundwater from contaminated sites for several kilometers in the form of colloids, with Pu being absorbed on clays,2 iron oxides,3 or natural organic matter.4 In the near‐field conditions of geological repositories of spent nuclear fuel and other radioactive wastes, the formation of intrinsic PuO2 colloids is a key scenario.5 Therefore, the characterization of such intrinsic colloidal nanoparticles (NPs) in aqueous solution has recently received much attention.6, 7, 8, 9, 10 The most debated question is the structural nature of these NPs (crystalline vs. amorphous) as well as the presence of PuV and other oxidation states in small NPs (<3 nm).9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 Various studies used different synthetic approaches and different solution conditions to examine a precipitated product, either amorphous or crystalline. This has led to a controversy which has not been resolved. For example, Walther et al.14 observed evidence for multiple Pu oxidation states (III, IV, V) in the early stages of hydrolysis and polymerization of PuO2 colloids at pH 0.5–1.0, while Rothe et al.9 reported PuIV oxyhydroxide‐colloid formation. Conradson et al.11 examined solid precipitates prepared by a variety of synthetic approaches and argued for the presence of PuV in nonstoichiometric PuO2+x solids.

One of the most fundamental properties of the chemical behavior of Pu is the variety of its oxidation states. The oxidation state is defined by the number of electrons that are removed from the valence orbitals of a neutral atom. In the pentavalent oxidation state, Pu has three electrons in the 5f shell, leaving the 6d orbitals empty. The oxidation state of Pu determines its chemical behavior and reactivity. Four oxidation states (from III to VI) may co‐exist under environmental conditions, while oxidation states VII and VIII are proposed to be stable under highly alkaline oxidative conditions.16 Oxidation states of aqueous, solid‐state, and interfacial Pu species have been previously determined using Pu L3 edge6, 7, 17 X‐ray absorption near edge structure (XANES) spectroscopy. The Pu edge of the L3 XANES spectrum of PuV always shows a characteristic energy shift towards low energies compared to PuIV and PuVI XANES spectra. The experimental energy resolution of the recorded XANES data can be improved if the spectra are recorded in the high energy resolution fluorescence detection (HERFD) mode.8 Nevertheless, at the Pu L3 edge, the electrons are excited from the 2p core level to the 6d level, which is always unoccupied independent of the Pu oxidation state. For uranium systems, we have previously shown that HERFD experiments at the U M4 edge18, 19, 20 are much more informative on the oxidation state and electronic structure than measurements at the L edges. X‐ray absorption at the M4 edge of actinides probes 5f states via transitions from the 3d core level. To our knowledge, HERFD data at the Pu M4 edge have never been reported in the literature and have never been exploited.

Figure 1 a shows the first experimental HERFD data at the Pu M4 edge for the PuIVO2 and KPuVO2CO3(s) (solid) systems with PuIV and PuV oxidation states, respectively. Data were collected with an X‐ray emission spectrometer21 set to the maximum of the Mβ emission line at 3534 eV. Synthesis procedures and the characterization of both materials are reported in the Supporting Information. The HERFD spectrum of PuO2 clearly shows two intense peaks, at ≈3970.2 eV and ≈3971.8 eV. According to the results of calculations carried out in the framework of the Anderson impurity model (AIM; Figure 1 b),22, 23, 24 the intensity and energy of these two peaks are a result of multiple factors, such as the strength of the intra‐atomic and crystal‐field interactions, and the degree of the Pu 5f/ligand 2p hybridization in the ground and final states of the spectroscopic process. In comparison with PuO2, the HERFD spectrum of KPuO2CO3(s) shifts towards higher incident energies and shows a narrow profile with an asymmetric shape and a shoulder at the higher incident energy side. The results of the AIM calculations reported in Figure 1 b show a good agreement with the experimental KPuO2CO3(s) HERFD spectrum, confirming the presence of the pentavalent Pu oxidation state in KPuO2CO3(s).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

a) Experimental HERFD data at the Pu M4 edge from two plutonium phases obtained during the synthesis of PuO2 nanoparticles (NPs) from a PuVI precursor at pH 11. Blue curve: spectrum of the intermediate PuV solid phase appearing during the synthesis of the PuO2 NPs; red curve: spectrum of the final phase of PuO2 NPs. The spectra of a PuO2 bulk sample (grey curve) and of KPuO2CO3(s) (green curve) are also shown as references for PuIV and PuV oxidation states, respectively. Data were collected with an X‐ray emission spectrometer set to the maximum of the Mβ emission line at 3534 eV. b) Experimental HERFD spectra of PuO2 and KPuO2CO3(s) compared with the results of Anderson impurity model calculations.

Due to dipole selection rules (J=0;±1), the shape of the Pu M4 and M5 HERFD transitions is expected to be different. At the Pu M5 edge, the unoccupied 5f electronic levels with J=5/2 and 7/2 can be reached by an electron excited from the Pu 3d5/2 state, whereas only the J=5/2 state can be reached at the Pu M4 edge.25 A comparison between Pu M4 and Pu M5 spectra for several Pu systems is shown in Figure S1 (Supporting Information). The energy shifts between PuIII, PuIV, and PuV in solid compounds are found to be in the order of 2 eV (between PuIII and PuIV) and 0.4 eV between PuIV and PuV (Table S1). A correct determination of the Pu oxidation state therefore requires the improved energy resolution of the absorption spectra provided by HERFD.

Figure 1 a shows experimental HERFD data recorded at different stages during the synthesis of PuO2 NPs from the aqueous PuVI precursor. For this purpose, a solution of PuVI was added to an excess of ammonia. The measured pH value of the solution was 11. We kinetically traced the route of the PuVI‐to‐PuO2 transformation as a two‐step process: during the first minutes, we observed the formation of an intermediate Pu phase consisting of yellow sludge (see Figure 2). Later, during the formation of PuO2 NPs, the intermediate phase dissolved and a different equilibrium phase (named “final phase” in the following) was formed.26 The Pu M4 HERFD spectrum recorded at the intermediate stage of the reaction is represented by the blue curve in Figure 1 a. The spectrum clearly indicates the presence of the PuV oxidation state. This is supported by the good correspondence between energy and the relative intensities of the main features of the Pu M4 edge spectrum for KPuO2CO3(s) (green curve) and the Pu intermediate phase (blue curve).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Kinetics of the precipitation of Pu starting from PuVI at pH 11 ([Pu]=6×10−5m). Inset: Crystal structure of the formed phases.

Furthermore, the HERFD spectrum of the final product of the reaction, formed after 3 weeks of the precipitation reaction, shows an identical profile to the one detected for PuO2 single crystal, confirming that the reaction terminates with the formation of PuO2 NPs with cubic structure and with the PuIV oxidation state, as reported by Soderholm et al.15 for Pu38 clusters (Li14(H2O)n[Pu38O56Cl54(H2O)8]) isolated from the initially alkaline peroxide solution.15

The experimental data collected for the intermediate phase during the PuO2 NPs synthesis show evidence of the PuV oxidation state. The exact contribution of the different chemical states in the Pu M4 HERFD data reported in Figure 1 a was estimated by the ITFA program.27 The results indicate that the spectrum of the intermediate Pu phase contains 87 % of PuV and 13 % of PuIV (with an estimated root‐mean‐square error of less than 2 %, see Figure S2). We did neither observe a significant contribution of PuV in the final phase (after the PuO2 NPs were formed) nor a quantifiable amount of PuVI (Table S2). The absence of PuV in the final phase and the 100 % presence of the PuIV oxidation state after the PuO2 NPs formation is an important result. At the same time, our data demonstrate that PuVI‐to‐PuIV reduction does not occur in a single step.26 The PuVI is first reduced to PuV and then to PuIV.

Moreover, additional HERFD and EXAFS (extended X‐ray absorption fine structure) experiments at the Pu L3 edge gave us the opportunity to identify the intermediate phase forming in the course of the PuO2 NPs growth. Figure 3 shows the comparison of the Pu HERFD L3 edge data recorded for PuO2 and the intermediate Pu phase during the PuO2 NPs formation. As discussed previously, the L3 spectrum of PuV compounds always shows a very characteristic energy shift towards low energies and a decrease of the L3 white line intensity compared to PuIV and PuVI systems6, 7, 8, 17 (Figure S3). The chemical shift of the intermediate Pu phase is clearly resolved in the HERFD data reported in Figure 3 and indicates the presence of the PuV oxidation state, in agreement with the Pu M4 HERFD results. However, for actinide systems, HERFD at the L3 edge is not as sensitive as the M4 edge HERFD to the presence of minor contributions (<10 %) from different oxidation states.28, 29 HERFD at the L3 edge is, however, extremely sensitive to the local structure around the absorber, which results in specific post‐edge features.19, 30, 31

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Pu L3 HERFD spectra of PuO2 and the PuV intermediate phase formed during the synthesis of PuO2 nanoparticles from PuVI precursors at pH 11. Experimental data (black lines) are compared with FDMNES calculations for bulk PuO2 and NH4PuO2CO3 (red lines).

Ab‐initio calculations on different structures were used to identify the intermediate Pu phase during the synthesis of the PuO2 NPs. We simulated the HERFD spectra of several compounds containing Pu (Figures S4 and S5) in order to determine the Pu speciation of the intermediate Pu phase structure. The best agreement is found for NH4PuO2CO3 in which Pu is present in the pentavalent state. The HERFD spectral shape reflects the d‐density of states (DOS) of Pu apart from the small shoulder at the absorption edge, which is barely visible in the data but well resolved in the simulation and represents the Pu 5f DOS (Figure S6). The Pu d‐DOS is involved in the bonds with O, C, and N. The Pu L3 EXAFS data confirmed that the intermediate Pu phase formed during the PuO2 NPs synthesis is compatible with NH4PuO2CO3. Furthermore, the EXAFS spectrum (Figure S7 and Table S3) could be fitted with a model based on the crystal structure of NH4PuO2CO3 that was previously published.32 The fitted Pu−O distance of the triple‐bond group is 1.82 Å, in good agreement with previously determined distances of 1.80–1.81 Å for PuV compounds7, 17, 33 (see Table S4), while the crystallographic distance of 1.93 Å is most likely biased by the very weak scattering of oxygen in comparison to Pu.33 We also found that the Pu−Pu coordination number in the experimental EXAFS spectra of the intermediate phase is lower than for the structural data, which can be explained either by a (partially) amorphous nature or by nano‐sized particles.

The intermediate NH4PuO2CO3 phase was completely dissolved within ≈10 h, after which the PuO2 NPs were formed as a result of longer redox reactions (see Figure 2). Finally, a part of the intermediate PuV phase was centrifuged out of suspension and dried at room temperature in order to check its stability over months. Surprisingly, the dried NH4PuO2CO3 phase was found to be stable over months. We recorded additional Pu L3 HERFD spectra after 3 months and the spectral shape remained the same (Figure S8). Therefore, the method reported here can be used to synthesize this PuV phase.

To understand the pH influence, we performed a similar experiment at pH 8. The kinetics of the Pu precipitation is very similar to the experiment at pH 11, whereas the quantity of the intermediate PuV phase is lower (Figure S9). Comparison of the experimental conditions with the available thermodynamic data shows that Eh/pH values during our synthesis correspond to the area of stability of the PuIV phase close to the phase boundary (Figure S10). It makes the formation of the intermediate PuV phase possible, but at the same time, the high thermodynamic stability of PuO2 and its extremely low solubility lead to a further transformation of the PuV phase into PuO2.

We show here for the first time that while PuV solid‐state complexes are always viewed as exotic compounds, a thermodynamically metastable PuV solid phase is formed during the reductive precipitation of PuO2 NPs from a PuVI precursor at pH 11. The intermediate PuV phase is characterized for the first time using HERFD at the Pu M4 edge and model calculations in the framework of AIM. The Pu M4 HERFD method allows for the unambiguous identification of the Pu oxidation state, it demonstrates the PuV existence, and provides quantitative estimates for varying Pu oxidation states. The local structure of the intermediate PuV phase, similar to NH4PuO2CO3, is identified by a combination of the Pu L3 HERFD experiment and ab‐initio calculations, and is found to be stable over a period of several months. The redox reactions behind aqueous PuVI−PuO2 NPs and the formation of PuV cause the substantial increase of the solubility. This finding provides a significant step towards a better understanding of Pu chemistry and emphasizes the value of the HERFD technique for studies of PuO2 NPs formation under different conditions.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Supporting information

As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.

Supplementary

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by European Commission Council under ERC grant N759696. The authors are grateful to HZDR for beamtime allocation at beamline BM20 and to ESRF for beamtime allocation at beamline ID26. We also thank P. Glatzel and T. Bohdan for help at beamline ID26 during the HERFD experiment at the Pu M4 edge. S.M.B. acknowledges support from the Swedish Research Council (research grant 2017‐06465). A.Yu.R. and A.T. acknowledge support from the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project 18‐33‐20129). The authors would like to thank P. Colomp and R. Murray from the ESRF safety group for their help in handling radioactive samples at the ID26 and BM20 beamlines.

K. O. Kvashnina, A. Y. Romanchuk, I. Pidchenko, L. Amidani, E. Gerber, A. Trigub, A. Rossberg, S. Weiss, K. Popa, O. Walter, R. Caciuffo, A. C. Scheinost, S. M. Butorin, S. N. Kalmykov, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 17558.

References

  • 1. Armaroli N., Balzani V., Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 3193. [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Kersting A. B., Efurd D. W., Finnegan D. L., Rokop D. J., Smith D. K., Thompson J. L., Nature 1999, 397, 56–59. [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Novikov A. P., Kalmykov S. N., Utsunomiya S., Ewing R. C., Horreard F., Merkulov A., Clark S. B., Tkachev V. V., Myasoedov B. F., Science 2006, 314, 638–641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Xu C., Santschi P. H., Zhong J. Y., Hatcher P. G., Francis A. J., Dodge C. J., Roberts K. A., Hung C.-C., Honeyman B. D., Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 8211–8217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Neck V., Altmaier M., Fanghänel T., C. R. Chim. 2007, 10, 959–977. [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Dalodière E., Virot M., Morosini V., Chave T., Dumas T., Hennig C., Wiss T., Dieste Blanco O., Shuh D. K., Tyliszcak T., et al., Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 43514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Dalodière E., Virot M., Dumas T., Guillaumont D., Illy M.-C., Berthon C., Guerin L., Rossberg A., Venault L., Moisy P., et al., Inorg. Chem. Front. 2018, 5, 100–111. [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Vitova T., Pidchenko I., Fellhauer D., Pruessmann T., Bahl S., Dardenne K., Yokosawa T., Schimmelpfennig B., Altmaier M., Denecke M., et al., Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 12824–12827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Rothe J., Walther C., Denecke M. A., Fanghänel T., Inorg. Chem. 2004, 43, 4708–4718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Kersting A. B., Inorg. Chem. 2013, 52, 3533–3546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Conradson S. D., Begg B. D., Clark D. L., den Auwer C., Ding M., Dorhout P. K., Espinosa-Faller F. J., Gordon P. L., Haire R. G., Hess N. J., et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 13443–13458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Sigmon G. E., Hixon A. E., Chem. Eur. J. 2019, 25, 2463–2466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Ekberg C., Larsson K., Skarnemark G., Ödegaard-Jensen A., Persson I., Dalton Trans. 2013, 42, 2035–2040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Walther C., Rothe J., Brendebach B., Fuss M., Altmaier M., Marquardt C. M., Büchner S., Cho H., Yun J., Seibert A., Radiochim. Acta 2009, 97, 199–207. [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Soderholm L., Almond P. M., Skanthakumar S., Wilson R. E., Burns P. C., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 298–302; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2008, 120, 304–308. [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Tananaev I. G., Nikonov M. V., Myasoedov B. F., Clark D. L., J. Alloys Compd. 2007, 444–445, 668–672. [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Conradson S. D., Abney K. D., Begg B. D., Brady E. D., Clark D. L., den Auwer C., Ding M., Dorhout P. K., Espinosa-Faller F. J., Gordon P. L., et al., Inorg. Chem. 2004, 43, 116–131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Kvashnina K. O., Butorin S. M., Martin P., Glatzel P., Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013, 111, 253002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Kvashnina K. O., Kvashnin Y. O., Butorin S. M., J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 2014, 194, 27–36. [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Butorin S. M., Kvashnina K. O., Prieur D., Rivenet M., Martin P. M., Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 115–118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Kvashnina K. O., Scheinost A. C., J. Synchrotron Radiat. 2016, 23, 836–841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Anderson P. W., Phys. Rev. 1961, 124, 41–53. [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Butorin S. M., Kvashnina K. O., Smith A. L., Popa K., Martin P. M., Chem. Eur. J. 2016, 22, 9693–9698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Butorin S. M., Modin A., Vegelius J. R., Kvashnina K. O., Shuh D. K., J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 29397–29404. [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Kvashnina K. O., Walker H. C., Magnani N., Lander G. H., Caciuffo R., Phys. Rev. B 2017, 95, 245103. [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Romanchuk A. Y., Plakhova T. V., Egorov A. V., Egorova T. B., Dorovatovskii P. V., Zubavichus Y. V., Shiryaev A. A., Kalmykov S. N., Dalton Trans. 2018, 47, 11239–11244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Roßberg A., Reich T., Bernhard G., Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2003, 376, 631–638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Leinders G., Bes R., Pakarinen J., Kvashnina K., Verwerft M., Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 6784–6787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Pidchenko I., Kvashnina K. O., Yokosawa T., Finck N., Bahl S., Schild D., Polly R., Bohnert E., Rossberg A., Göttlicher J., et al., Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 2217–2225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Amidani L., Plakhova T. V., Romanchuk A. Y., Gerber E., Weiss S., Efimenko A., Sahle C. J., Butorin S. M., Kalmykov S. N., Kvashnina K. O., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2019, 21, 10635–10643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Kvashnina K. O., Kvashnin Y. O., Vegelius J. R., Bosak A., Martin P. M., Butorin S. M., Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 8772–8780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Ellinger F. H., Zachariasen W. H., J. Phys. Chem. 1954, 58, 405–408. [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Di Giandomenico M. V., Le Naour C., Simoni E., Guillaumont D., Moisy P., Hennig C., Conradson S. D., Den Auwer C., Radiochim. Acta 2009, 97, 347—353. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.

Supplementary


Articles from Angewandte Chemie (International Ed. in English) are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES