Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Iranian Biomedical Journal logoLink to Iranian Biomedical Journal
. 2019 Aug 28;24(1):47–53. doi: 10.29252/ibj.24.1.47

Correlation of HER2, MDM2, c-MYC, c-MET, and TP53 Copy Number Alterations in Circulating Tumor Cells with Tissue in Gastric Cancer Patients: A Pilot Study

Fatemeh Nevisi 1, Marjan Yaghmaie 2,*, Hossein Pashaiefar 2,3, Kamran Alimoghaddam 2, Masoud Iravani 4, Gholamreza Javadi 1, Ardeshir Ghavamzadeh 2
PMCID: PMC6900480  PMID: 31454863

Abstract

Background:

The analysis of the gene copy number alterations in tumor samples are increasingly used for diagnostic and prognostic purposes in patients with GC. However, these procedures are not always applicable due to their invasive nature. In this study, we have analyzed the copy number alterations of five genes (HER2, MDM2, c-MYC, c-MET, and TP53) with a fixed relevance for GC in the CTC of GC patients, and, accordingly, as a potential approach, evaluated their usage to complete primary tumor biopsy.

Methods:

We analyzed the status of the copy number alterations of the selected genes in CTC and matched biopsy tissues from 37 GC patients using FISH.

Results:

HER2 amplification was observed in 2 (5.41%) samples. HER2 gene status in CTC showed a strong agreement with its status in 36 out of 37 patients’ matched tissue samples (correlation: 97.29%; Kappa: 0.65; p < 0.001). MDM2 amplification was found only in 1 (2.70%) sample; however, the amplification of this gene was not detectable in the CTC isolated from this patient. c-MYC amplification was observed in 3 (8.11%) samples, and the status of its amplification in the CTC indicated a complete agreement with its status in the matched tissue samples (correlation: 100%; Kappa: 1.0).

Conclusion:

Our work suggests that the amplification of HER2 and c-MYC is in concordance with the CTC and achieved biopsies, and, consequently, CTC may act as a non-invasive alternative for recording the amplification of these genes among GC patients.

Key Words: Circulating tumor cells, Fluorescence in situ hybridization, Gene amplification

Introduction

Gastric cancer is the fourth most common cancer with high morbidity and mortality; it leads to more than 70,000 deaths annually worldwide[1,2]. Despite the steady decline in the incidence of the mortality, there are some limitations for diagnostic and therapeutic process of the GC treatment that include the lack of precise diagnostic tests for the early detection and the absence of valuable prognostic factors. Therefore, for improving the management of GC patients, attention should be focused on the development of appropriate diagnostic and monitoring tools. During the past recent decades, numerous studies have shown the potential efficiency of CTC, as a novel blood-based biomarker for diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic purposes for various types of cancers, including GC[3].

Historically, the major source of material for the evaluation of the genetic changes of tumor cells are the tumor tissues obtained from surgical or biopsy specimens. However, due to several limitations, such tumor tissue-based strategies cannot be carried out routinely. It may even be impossible to obtain a tissue specimen, especially in metastatic cases with anatomical challenges. Likewise, the tissues obtained from biopsy may not always be adequate for the detection of genetic alterations occurring in tumor cells. Besides, due to the genomic difference between the primary and metastatic tumors arising from the same patient, the tumor tissue acquired at the time of diagnosis may not reflect the genetic alterations observed at the time of clinical progression. Moreover, chemotherapy or targeted therapy may lead to genetic variation in the tumor cells. In such cases, CTC may be a helpful approach for detecting the current status of tumor features, allowing repeated samplings and providing useful and timely information for determining the best treatment options. Furthermore, detecting CTC and determining the genetic changes in these cells may result in a better and real-time understanding of the tumor genetic profile. Studies have shown that the presence of CTC and the changes in their counts in the blood stream of GC patients may be a useful tool for predicting the prognosis of these patients and the progression of the tumor, and, therefore, may act as a good monitoring marker for chemotherapy[4,5].

The molecular characterization of CTC is complex because of the relatively low number of CTC and their dilution by non-tumor cells. FISH is an effective method for evaluating the gene copy number in the individual cells of a heterogeneous cell population[6] and has been successfully applied for tumor cells isolated from the blood[7]. Therefore, in this study, using FISH, we analyzed the copy number alterations of five genes (HER2, MDM2, c-MYC, c-MET, and TP53) in the CTC obtained from GC patients to evaluate their usage as a potential complement approach for primary tumor biopsies. The objective of this study was to determine whether the molecular study of CTC can act as an alternative source of tissue specimens to GC patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients

Peripheral blood samples were obtained from 37 patients with metastatic GC who were treated at the Madaen and Sina Hospitals, and Masoud Clinic (Tehran, Iran). All patients received intravenously 60 mg/m2 of Taxotere and 60 mg/m2 of Oxaliplatin, followed by continuous IV infusion of 5-fluorouracil 5-FU (500 mg/m2) over 24 hours. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues from the primary tumors were obtained from the pathology core at the Madaen and Sina Hospitals. The pathological staging of the disease was performed based on the revised tumor-node-metastasis classification system[8]. The histological diagnosis was based on the World Health Organization criteria[9]. An informed consent was obtained from each patient, and the study was approved by the Ethics Committee (TUMS-30076) of Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Isolation of CTC

The peripheral blood samples were collected from the GC patients and transferred into a 10-mL CellSave Preservative Tube (Veridex, Raritan, NJ, USA). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were immediately isolated by Ficoll-Paque (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI, USA) density-gradient centrifugation, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Phosphate-buffered saline was used to wash the cell pellets (0.15 M, pH 7.4). CTC were isolated from the peripheral blood mononuclear cell using the Dynabeads CD45 kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions based a negative selection methodology. Accordingly, CD45- cells with intact 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole nuclei exhibiting tumor-associated morphologies were classified as CTC.

FISH on paraffin-embedded tissue sections

The paraffin-embedded tissues were cut into 3-5-micron sections using a microtome. One H & E stained slide from each patient was examined by an expert pathologist to mark the malignant cell areas. The sections were placed on positive-charged slides (Menzel-Gläster, Braunschweig, Germany), deparaffinized and rehydrated through an ethanol series, which were subsequently air-dried. To identify HER2, MDM2, c-MYC, c-MET, and P53 copy number alterations, FISH was performed as previously described[10]. The probes HER2/CE17, MDM2/CE12, and TP53/NF1 (Cytocell, UK) as well as c-MET/CE7 and c-MYC/CE8 (Metasystems, Germany) were applied on malignant cells. The hybridized slides were examined under an Olympus BX51 microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) at 100 magnification. MDM2, c-MYC, and c-MET were considered as amplified copies if MDM2/CEP12, c-MYC/CEP8, and c-MET/CEP7 ratio were of ≥2, or more than four of the copies of these genes in ≥40% of the analyzed cells were observed (high polysomy)[11]. The cut-off value of 5% was used for the evaluation of the TP53 deletion.

FISH on CTC

Following CTC enrichment, the slides were prepared and immersed in 2 sodium chloride-sodium citrate buffer at room temperature for 2 minutes. The slides were then dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol solutions (70, 85, 90, and 100%, each for 1-2 minutes). Afterward, 1.5 μl of the probe mixture was added to the cells on the slides and covered with a coverslip. Denaturation was performed at 76 °C for 5 minutes, and hybridization was carried out at 37 °C for 18 hours. Following the hybridization, the slides were washed in 0.4 sodium chloride-sodium citrate at 72 °C for 2 minutes and then were immersed in 2 sodium chloride-sodium citrate /0.1% NP-40 (pH 7.0) solution at room temperature for one minute. After loading 10 μl of 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (Cytocell, UK) onto each slide, using a fluorescence microscope, FISH signals were evaluated on a minimum of 100 interphase nuclei with prominent nucleoli (Olympus, BX50, Japan). The same cut-off values of the tissues were used to evaluate the copy number alterations of the selected genes in the CTC.

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistical analyses, including Cohen’s kappa testing, were performed using the SPSS 20.0 software package (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Specificity and sensitivity for HER2 and c-MYC amplification detection in CTC were calculated based on the classification of patients for HER2 and c-MYC amplification status achieved from the archival tissues and CTC.

RESULTS

Our study was comprised of 37 patients, including 23 males (62.2%) and 14 females (37.8%). The patients’ age ranged from 33 to 85 years (median: 65 years) at the time of diagnosis. The most cases of gastric tumors are from distal stomach (54.05%) in comparison with tumors arising from the gastric cardia or the gastroesophageal junction. The tumor size varied between 2 and 5 cm (average: 3.5 cm). Seven cases (19%) had advanced tumors at the time of diagnosis.

Copy number alterations in the CTC and matched tumor tissue

According to our selected cut-off, HER2/CEP17, MDM2/CEP12, and c-MYC/CEP8 amplification was observed in a total of 2 (5.41%), 1 (2.70%), and 3 (8.11%) out of 37 patients’ tissue samples, respectively (Fig. 1). However, c-MET amplification and TP53 deletion were not observed in our cohort. Overall, amplification of at least one of the selected genes was observed in 3 out of 37 patients. The co-amplification of HER2, MDM2, and c-MYC was observed in one patient, and a simultaneous amplification of HER2 and c-MYC was found in another patient (Table 1). An isolated amplification of the c-MYC oncogene was also seen in one of the samples. HER2, MDM2, and c-MYC amplification occurred in the intestinal tumors; however, the copy number alterations of the genes of interest were not detected among the prolonged cancers. By determining the status of HER2, MDM2, c-MYC, c-MET, and TP53 copy number alteration of the CTC samples obtained from all the patients, we found that HER2 and c-MYC amplification occurred in 1 and 3 out of the 37 patients, respectively. There were no P53 or c-MET gene copy number alterations in the obtained CTC and tissue samples in our patients. The comparison of the status of HER2, MDM2, and c-MYC genes of the 37 GC patients’ CTC samples with that of the patients’ matched tumor tissues demonstrated that the mean interval between the CTC and tissue samples was equal to 20.1 days. In 36 out of the 37 patients, the HER2 gene status in the CTC showed a strong harmony with its status in the matched tissue samples (correlation: 97.29%; Kappa: 0.65; p < 0.001). MDM2 amplification was observed in only 1 (2.70%) of the 37 patients’ tissue samples; however, the amplification of this gene was not detectable in the CTC isolated from the patient. c-MYC amplification were observed in 3 (8.11%) out of the 37 patients’ samples, and the amplification status in these CTC showed a complete agreement with the status attained from the matched tissue samples (correlation: 100%; Kappa: 1.0, sensitivity: 100%, specificity: 100%.).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

HER2 and c-MYC amplification in paired CTC and tissue samples obtained from GC patients. HER2 and c-MYC amplification in tissue (A and C) and in CTC (B and D), respectively

Table 1.

GC samples with gene amplification

Case
No. 		Sex/
age 		GC
types 		Histological
classification 		Stage Number of CTC analyzed HER2 amplification (% tissue/ %CTC) MDM2 amplification (% tissue/% CTC) c-MYC amplification (% tissue/% CTC)
1 M/65 intestinal Poorly differentiated III 100 80/NA 70/NA 90/90
2 M/75 intestinal Well differentiated II 100 80/80 NA/NA 70/70
3 M/61 intestinal Adenocarcinoma II 100 NA/NA NA/NA 90/90
Open in a new tab

DISCUSSION

Although recent improvements in the diagnosis and management of GC have resulted in a decrease in overall mortality, most GC patients suffer from advanced or metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis, which is still a major cause of cancer-related deaths in the world[2]. Therefore, development of better diagnostic, prognostic and disease monitoring tools are crucial for the improvement of the clinical outcome of GC patients. Tissue samples were the main sources for evaluating tumor-associated genetic alterations in GC patients. However, the use of tissue samples has several limitations, such as the invasive nature and inability to reflect tumor heterogeneity. Over recent decades, CTC have gained global attention in order to overcome these limitations[12]. Several studies have been indicated the prognostic value of the enumeration of CTC in numerous types of cancers, including GC[13,14]. Moreover, it has been shown that CTC may represent the genetic compositions of both primary and metastatic tumors, and the real-time assessment of prognostic and therapeutic biomarkers on CTC may be useful to improve the clinical outcome of these patients and also to have a significant effect on targeted cancer therapy[15-18]. In this study, using the FISH technique, we analyzed the copy number alterations of HER2, MDM2, c-MYC, c-MET, and TP53 in CTC obtained from GC patients to evaluate their application as a potential alternative to tumor biopsy. The importance of HER2, MDM2, c-MYC, and c-MET amplification and TP53 deletion in the progression of GC and their negative effects on the survival of patients with GC have been reported in a number of studies[19].

In the present study, amplification of MDM2, c-MYC and HER2 was shown in a total of three patients who all had intestinal-type GC. The first patient, who showed co-amplification of MDM2, c-MYC, and HER2, was a 65-year-old male. The gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed advanced GC in the cardia of the gastric body, while biopsy results displayed a poor differentiated adenocarcinoma. The clinical diagnosis was T4N2M0, stage III. The second patient, who was a 75-year-old male, indicated co-amplification of c-MYC and HER2. The gastrointestinal endoscopy showed advanced GC in the cardia of the gastric body, but biopsy results exhibited a well differentiated adenocarcinoma. The clinical diagnosis was T3N0M0, stage II. Finally, the third patient, who showed only c-MYC amplification, was a 61-year-old male. The gastrointestinal endoscopy disclosed advanced GC in the antrum of the gastric body; however, the results of biopsy demonstrated a poor differentiated adeno-carcinoma. The clinical diagnosis was T3N0M0, stage II. Although CTC count in patients with GC may act as an early biomarker for the determination of therapeutic efficacy, the prognostic significant of CTC molecular profiling, including determination of MDM2, c-MYC, and HER2 status in CTC, is less determined in GC patients. The criteria for assessing biomarker status of MDM2, c-MYC, and HER2 in CTC from patients with GC are debatable. However, a recent study has unveiled that CTC molecular profiling in advanced GC patients may improve personalized treatment of patients and may prevent tumor progression[20].

As reported in a study, trastuzumab improved the overall survival among patients with HER2-positive GC[21]. Therefore, assessing of the HER2 status in the primary tumor tissue of GC patients is recommended for finding patients who are likely to profit from trastuzumab therapy. The status of HER2 is mostly determined through analyzing the tumor tissue at the time of initial diagnosis. However, it has been indicated that the HER2 status may be changed during the progression of disease, and the re-assessment of HER2 is needed for GC patients who have recurrence or are in the metastatic phase of the disease. Nonetheless, due to the inaccessibility of the tumor tissue, it is often impossible[22,23]. In this study, we used FISH to evaluate the HER2 amplification status in the CTC obtained from the GC patients. In our study, HER2 was amplified in 5.41% of the GC primary tumor tissues. The observed prevalence of HER2 gene amplification in the primary tumor tissue of GC patients were in the same range, which has been found in a FISH-based study reported in 2002 by Takehana et al.[24] who found HER2 amplification in approximately 8% of the cases. The HER2 gene status in the CTC showed a strong concordance with its status obtained from the matched tissue samples in 36 of the 37 patients (97.3%). Among the non-concordant results, only one patient’s tumor tissue showed HER2 amplification, along with CTC without HER2 amplification. This difference may be related to the time interval between the time of tissue sampling and CTC HER2 testing. The results of this study was in agreement with a previous study in which HER2 concordance of 97% between the CTC and breast cancer tissue samples was reported[25].

Recent studies have suggested that the overexpression of c-MYC may play a role in the tumorigeneses process of GC, and its deregulation is associated with the poor prognostic features of GC patients[26,27]. Moreover, it has been shown that amplification was the main mechanism of c-MYC deregulation in GC[28]. However, c-MYC amplification displayed a high degree of heterogeneity in tissue samples obtained from GC patients. It has also been shown that only small parts of a tumor may harbor c-MYC amplification[29]. This tumor hetero-geneity decreases the accuracy of diagnosis. In this study, we used FISH to evaluate the c-MYC gene amplification status in the CTC and, accordingly, matched tumor tissues obtained from GC patients to evaluate whether CTC can replace tissue sampling for the determination of the c-MYC status in GC patients. c-MYC amplification was observed in 8.12% of GC cases, and it was the most frequently amplified gene in our study. The observed prevalence of c-MYC gene amplification in the primary tumor tissue of GC patients using FISH was within the previously reported range (1.3-7.9%)[30,31]. The c-MYC amplification status of the CTC was in a complete agreement with the status of the matched tissue samples (100%). This high concordance rate suggests that CTC may show a complementary role for tumor tissues in the assessment of the c-MYC status in clinical practice, especially for recurrent or metastatic cases.

In this study, MDM2 amplification was found in the primary tumor tissue of a single case of GC (2.70%). However, the amplification of this gene was undetectable in the CTC isolated from the same patient. In this case, MDM2 amplification was seen in 70% of the cells analyzed in the tissue sample. It is possible that with the emergence of new clones without MDM2 amplification, MDM2 amplification diminishes during the progression of the disease.

In this cohort study, we did not observe any c-MET amplification and TP53 detention. A previous study has shown that the gain-of-function mutations in c-MET were exceedingly rare in GC[32]. Therefore, due to the small sample size of our study, absence of c-MET amplification in our patients seems to be rational.

Our study revealed the feasibility of HER2 and c-MYC status analysis in CTC obtained from GC patients by FISH technique. The concordance between the FISH results of HER2 and c-MYC in CTC and archival tumor tissue showed the potential of using CTC FISH assays for determining the gene status of HER2 and c-MYC in GC patients. Displacement in the MDM2 and HER2 status amid archival tumor tissues and CTC (in one case) and also the heterogeneity of MDM2, HER2, and c-MYC gene status in the CTC (amplified and non-amplified cells coexisted) suggest that CTC analyses possibly provide important insight about disease heterogeneity, clonal evolution, and clone dynamics.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was financially supported by the Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (Grant no. 30042).

CONFLICT OF INTEREST.

None declared.

References

  • 1.Rugge M, Fassan M, Graham DY. Epidemiology of Gastric Cancer. In: Strong VE, editor. Gastric Cancer: Principles and Practice. 2015 ed. Springer International Publishing; 2015. pp. 23–34. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet‐Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2015;65(2):87–108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Alix-Panabières C, Pantel K. Circulating tumor cells: liquid biopsy of cancer. Clinical chemistry. 2013;59(1):110–118. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2012.194258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Liu Y, Ling Y, Qi Q, Lan F, Zhu M, Zhang Y, Bao Y, Zhang C. Prognostic value of circulating tumor cells in advanced gastric cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Molecular and clinical oncology. 2017;6(2):235–242. doi: 10.3892/mco.2017.1125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Uenosono Y, Arigami T, Kozono T, Yanagita S, Hagihara T, Haraguchi N, Matsushita D, Hirata M, Arima H, Funasako Y, Kijima Y, Nakajo A, Okumura H, Ishigami S, Hokita S, Ueno S, Natsugoe S. Clinical significance of circulating tumor cells in peripheral blood from patients with gastric cancer. Cancer. 2013;119(22):3984–3991. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Speicher MR, Carter NP. The new cytogenetics: blurring the boundaries with molecular biology. Nature reviews genetics. 2005;6(10):782–792. doi: 10.1038/nrg1692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fehm T, Sagalowsky A, Clifford E, Beitsch P, Saboorian H, Euhus D, Meng S, Morrison L, Tucker T, Lane N, Ghadimi BM, Heselmeyer-Haddad K, Ried T, Rao C, Uhr J. Cytogenetic evidence that circulating epithelial cells in patients with carcinoma are malignant. Clinical cancer research. 2002;8(7):2073–2084. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kranenbarg EK. TNM classification: clarification of number of regional lymph nodes for pN0. British journal of cancer. 2001;85(5):780. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2001.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jass JR, Sobin LH, Watanabe H. The World Health Organization's histologic classification of gastro-intestinal tumors: A commentary on the second edition. Cancer. 1990;66(10):2162–2167. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19901115)66:10<2162::aid-cncr2820661020>3.0.co;2-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Shahi F, Alishahi R, Pashaiefar H, Jahanzad I, Kamalian N, Ghavamzadeh A, Yaghmaie M. Differentiating and categorizing of liposarcoma and synovial sarcoma neoplasms by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Iranian journal of pathology. 2017;12(3):209–217. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bartley AN, Washington MK, Ventura CB, Ismaila N, Colasacco C, Benson AB 3rd, Carrato A, Gulley ML, Jain D, Kakar S, Mackay HJ, Streutker C, Tang L, Troxell M, Ajani JA. HER2 testing and clinical decision making in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: guideline from the College of American Pathologists, American Society for Clinical Pathology, and American Society of Clinical Oncology. American journal of clinical pathology. 2016;146(6):647–669. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqw206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cai LL, Ye HM, Zheng LM, Ruan RS, Tzeng CM. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) as a liquid biopsy material and drug target. Current drug targets. 2014;15(10):965–972. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mavroudis D. Circulating cancer cells. Annals of oncology. 2010;21(suppl_7):vii95–vii100. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tseng JY, Yang CY, Liang SC, Liu RS, Jiang JK, Lin CH. Dynamic changes in numbers and properties of circulating tumor cells and their potential applications. Cancers (Basel) 2014;6(4):2369–2386. doi: 10.3390/cancers6042369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Arigami T, Uenosono Y, Hirata M, Yanagita S, Ishigami S, Natsugoe S. B7‐H3 expression in gastric cancer: A novel molecular blood marker for detecting circulating tumor cells. Cancer science. 2011;102(5):1019–1024. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2011.01877.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Saad AA, Awed NM, Abd Elkerim NN, El-Shennawy D, Alfons MA, Elserafy ME, Darwish YW, Barakat EM, Ezz-Elarab SS. Prognostic significance of E-cadherin expression and peripheral blood micro-metastasis in gastric carcinoma patients. Annals of surgical oncology. 2010;17(11):3059–3067. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1151-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pituch-Noworolska A, Kolodziejczyk P, Kulig J, Drabik G, Szczepanik A, Czupryna A, Popiela T, Zembala M. Circulating tumour cells and survival of patients with gastric cancer. Anticancer research. 2007;27(1B):635–640. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tsujiura M, Ichikawa D, Konishi H, Komatsu S, Shiozaki A, Otsuji E. Liquid biopsy of gastric cancer patients: circulating tumor cells and cell-free nucleic acids. World journal of gastroenterology: World journal of gastroenterology. 2014;20(12):3265–3286. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i12.3265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tan P, Yeoh KG. Genetics and molecular pathogenesis of gastric adenocarcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2015;149(5):1153–1162. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.05.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hazra S, Lee J, Kim PS, Kim KM, Liu L, Fithian EWA, Singh S, Kang W. Profiling of circulating tumor cells isolated from 105 metastatic gastric cancer patients revealed HER2 overexpression/activation for potential use in clinical setting. Journal of clinical oncology. 2012;30(15 suppl) [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bang YJ, Van Cutsem E, Feyereislova A, Chung HC, Shen L, Sawaki A, Lordick F, Ohtsu A, Omuro Y, Satoh T, Aprile G, Kulikov E, Hill J, Lehle M, Rüschoff J, Kang YK; ToGA Trial Investigators. Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;376(9742):687–697. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61121-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wong DD, Kumarasinghe MP, Platten MA, De Boer WB. Concordance of HER2 expression in paired primary and metastatic sites of gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction cancers. Pathology. 2015;47(7):641–646. doi: 10.1097/PAT.0000000000000323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Park SR, Park YS, Ryu MH, Ryoo BY, Woo CG, Jung HY, Lee JH, Lee GH, Kang YK. Extra-gain of HER2-positive cases through HER2 reassessment in primary and metastatic sites in advanced gastric cancer with initially HER2-negative primary tumours: Results of GASTric cancer HER2 reassessment study 1 (GASTHER1) European journal of cancer. 2016;53:42–50. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.09.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Takehana T, Kunitomo K, Kono K, Kitahara F, Iizuka H, Matsumoto Y, Fujino MA, Ooi A. Status of c‐erbB‐2 in gastric adenocarcinoma: a comparative study of immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization and enzyme‐linked immuno‐sorbent assay. International journal of cancer. 2002;98(6):833–837. doi: 10.1002/ijc.10257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Meng S, Tripathy D, Shete S, Ashfaq R, Haley B, Perkins S, Beitsch P, Khan A, Euhus D, Osborne C, Frenkel E, Hoover S, Leitch M, Clifford E, Vitetta E, Morrison L, Herlyn D, Terstappen LW, Fleming T, Fehm T, Tucker T, Lane N, Wang J, Uhr J. HER-2 gene amplification can be acquired as breast cancer progresses. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences of the United States of America. 2004;101(25):9393–9398. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0402993101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.de Souza CRT, Leal MF, Calcagno DQ, Costa Sozinho EK, Borges Bdo N, Montenegro RC, Dos Santos AK, Dos Santos SE, Ribeiro HF, Assumpção PP, de Arruda Cardoso Smith M, Burbano RR. MYC deregulation in gastric cancer and its clinicopathological implications. PloS one. 2013;8(5) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Khaleghian M, Shakoori A, Razavi AE, Azimi C. Relationship of amplification and expression of the c-MYC gene with survival among gastric cancer patients. Asian pacific journal of cancer prevention. 2015;16(16):7061–7069. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.16.7061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Calcagno DQ, Leal MF, Assumpção PP, Smith MA, Burbano RR. MYC and gastric adenocarcinoma carcinogenesis. World journal of gastroenterology. 2008;14(39):5962–5968. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.5962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Stahl P, Seeschaaf C, Lebok P, Kutup A, Bockhorn M, Izbicki JR, Bokemeyer C, Simon R, Sauter G, Marx AH. Heterogeneity of amplification of HER2, EGFR, CCND1 and MYC in gastric cancer. BMC gastroenterology. 2015;15 doi: 10.1186/s12876-015-0231-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Tajiri R, Ooi A, Fujimura T, Dobashi Y, Oyama T, Nakamura R, Ikeda H. Intratumoral heterogeneous amplification of ERBB2 and subclonal genetic diversity in gastric cancers revealed by multiple ligation-dependent probe amplification and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Human pathology. 2014;45(4):725–734. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2013.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Koo SH, Kwon KC, Shin SY, Jeon YM, Park JW, Kim SH, Noh SM. Genetic alterations of gastric cancer: comparative genomic hybridization and fluorescence in situ hybridization studies. Cancer genetics and cytogenetics. 2000;117(2):97–103. doi: 10.1016/s0165-4608(99)00152-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Park WS, Oh RR, Kim YS, Park JY, Shin MS, Lee HK, Lee SH, Yoo NJ, Lee JY. Absence of mutations in the kinase domain of the Met gene and frequent expression of Met and HGF/SF protein in primary gastric carcinomas. Apmis. 2000;108(3):195–200. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0463.2000.d01-44.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Iranian Biomedical Journal are provided here courtesy of Pasteur Institute of Iran

RESOURCES