Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Dec 9.
Published in final edited form as: Future Med Chem. 2012 Mar;4(3):297–313. doi: 10.4155/fmc.11.191

Exploiting bacterial iron acquisition: siderophore conjugates

Cheng Ji 1, Raúl E Juárez-Hernández 1, Marvin J Miller 1,*
PMCID: PMC6901097  NIHMSID: NIHMS1059846  PMID: 22393938

Abstract

Siderophores are chelators synthesized by bacteria and fungi to sequester iron, which is essential for virulence and pathogenicity. Since the process involves active transport, which is highly regulated, remarkably efficient and often microbially selective, it has been exploited as a Trojan Horse method for development of microbe-selective antibiotics. Siderophores also have significant potential for the development of imaging contrast agents and diagnostics for pathogen-selective detection. These promising results demonstrate the versatility of natural and synthetic microbial iron chelators and their potential therapeutic applications.


Iron is one of the most abundant elements on Earth, yet its bioavailability is limited by the formation of highly insoluble salts in the presence of oxygen and aqueous solutions. Within biological systems, iron-pools are tightly controlled by protein-based metal-chelators, in order to ensure their proper use and to protect the host against oxidative damage. Most organisms require iron, since it is an essential element used as a cofactor in enzymes, involved in the transport of oxygen, production of energy and other vital metabolic processes [1]. Bacteria also require iron, and ensuring its acquisition is a fundamental step during the establishment of an infectious cycle [2]. Although microorganisms possess an array of methods for the acquisition of iron, one of the most widespread mechanisms is the biosynthesis of low-molecular mass, high affinity Fe3+-chelators called siderophores, which are secreted to the extracellular environment, where they gather iron from diverse sources. The resulting complexes are assimilated using an active transport system by the bacteria (Figure 1) [37].

Figure 1. Siderophore-mediated iron acquisition and its exploitation by ‘Trojan horses’.

Figure 1.

(A) Siderophore biosynthesis; (B) siderophore efflux to extracellular environment; (C) iron(III) binding; (D) siderophore–iron(III) complex recognition and transport into the cell; the siderophore–drug conjugate enters the competing organism cell via the corresponding siderophore uptake pathway to deliver the drug moiety, which eventually leads to cell death; (E) iron assimilation from the siderophore–iron(III) complex; (F) iron use/storage [8].

Since the need for iron is critical, microorganisms have developed receptors to recognize and transport siderophore–iron complexes from other species (xenosiderophores) in order to gain a competitive growth advantage (Figure 1) [8]. To counter this siderophore-thievery, some microorganisms synthesize siderophore–drug conjugates called sideromycins that consist of a modified chelator with a covalently linked drug-like molecule (Figure 2). Acting as a Trojan Horse, a sideromycin enters the competing organism cell via the corresponding siderophore uptake pathway to deliver the drug moiety, which eventually leads to cell death (Figure 1) [9]. Long ago, the potential of exploiting siderophore–drug conjugates was recognized by many laboratories and synthetic analogues of these molecules have been reported in order to better understand their mode of action, therapeutic potential and limitations [10]. Although studies of siderophore conjugates have primarily focused on the area of antibiotic delivery, other applications have also been considered including the generation and use of related metal complexes to disrupt iron metabolism, use as imaging elements, delivery of fluorescent probes and even as diagnostic agents for detection of microorganisms. Herein, we provide an overview of siderophore conjugate studies reported since the year 2000, with the objective of better grasping the enormous potential of these molecules.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Examples of naturally occurring siderophore-drug conjugates (sideromycins).

Structurally, a sideromycin consists of a metal–binding portion, a spacer or linker, and a drug moiety. Albomycins are among the most extensively studied, naturally occurring siderophore-drug conjugates (Figure 2) [9]. They consist of a trihydroxamate-based siderophore portion and a thioribosyl-pyrimidine moiety, which is a seryl-t-RNA synthetase inhibitor. When actively acquired by non-producing strains of bacteria, the drug-moiety in albomycin is cleaved by the action of a serine peptidase N. The drug-release process is essential for biological activity, microorganisms lacking the ability to recognize and transport the Fe3+ complex, or without the serine peptidase N to cleave the drug, are not sensitive to the antibiotic activity of the albomycins [11,12]. Microcins are siderophore conjugates containing polypeptide antibiotics attached to the siderophore enterobactin by means of a glucose linker [13,14]. The delivery of large molecules, as exemplified by these microcins, demonstrates the ability to introduce almost any imaginable compound by exploiting bacterial iron uptake. Based on their general structural features, synthetic analogues of these sideromycins can be designed in a similar fashion.

Synthesis & biological activity of desferridanoxamine–antibiotic conjugates

As another example of a sideromycin, salmycin B was isolated from the fermentation broth of Streptomyces violaceus DSM 8286 in 1995 by Vértesy and co-workers [15]. Salmycin B, along with other congeners (A, C and D), was found to be highly active against both Staphylococci and Streptococci, including resistant strains of these pathogens. The structure of salmycin B comprises the known siderophore danoxamine and an unusual amino-disaccharide antibiotic. After completing the assembly of danoxamine [16], Dong et al. reported the first total synthesis of desferrisalmycin B [17], which revealed that the heptopyranose component in the disaccharide has a D-glycero-D-gluco configuration. As expected, the synthetic desferrisalmycin B was found to have comparable antibiotic activity to that of the naturally occurring salmycins [18], demonstrating the feasibility of building these types of molecules by complete chemical synthesis. Wencewicz et al. further explored the use of desferridanoxamine as a delivery agent of other antibiotics by preparing siderophore–drug conjugates 1–3 (Figure 3) using loracarbef, ciprofloxacin and triclosan as the drugs of choice [19].

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Naturally occurring salmycins and synthetic desferridanoxamine-drug conjugates.

The antibacterial activity of the synthetic desferridanoxamine–drug conjugates 1–3 was studied by performing growth inhibition assays in agar media. All three drug conjugates were active against an array of different bacteria and even the drug-free desferridanoxamine itself inhibited the growth of Escherichia coli and Mycobacterium vaccae, probably due to induction of iron starvation at high concentrations (2 mM). In all cases but triclosan conjugate 3, the siderophore-drug conjugate had diminished antibacterial activity compared with the parent drug, suggesting either the need for an intracellular drug release process or that the drug did not reach its target or, if it did, had a lower affinity for the target due to the chemical modification of the drug. In the case of triclosan conjugate 3, the observed inhibitory activity was equal or higher than the drug itself. To probe if drug release by hydrolysis occurred in the agar medium, the synthetic precursor of conjugate 3 (O-benzyl protected hydroxamates) was screened for antibacterial activity and found to be inactive, suggesting that triclosan was not being released extracellularly under the conditions tested.

Desketoneoenactin–siderophore conjugates for Candida

In 2005, Bernier et al. reported the use of siderophore–drug conjugates and their efficacy, based on the specificity of the yeast iron transport systems in Candida spp [20]. A series of natural and synthetic siderophores including ferrichrome (FCH), ferrioxamine B, isocyanurate-based hydroxamate, ornithine-based trihydroxamate (ORNI) and rhodotorulic acid were screened to determine their potential as growth promoters in yeast. FCH was found to be most effective, followed by its acyclic trihydroxamate-based siderophore compontent (ORNI). Based on these observations, three siderophore-conjugates were prepared and screened against a panel of Candida spp. (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Siderophore–drug conjugates against Candida spp.

Conjugation of antifungal agent 13C-Desketoneoenact in (DE) 4 to hydroxamate-based siderophores significantly reduced the activity relative to the drug (DE) itself (Figure 4). However, the activity of the siderophore–conjugate did improve when tested under iron-deficient conditions, possibly due to an over-expression of the FCH receptor, which is responsible for the acquisition of trihydrox-amate-based siderophores. The observed activity increase induced by iron deficiency was most evident when screened against strains that were able to use ORNI siderophores as growth factors. Interestingly, the DE-monohydroxamate conjugate (DE-mono) 6 was the most active compound of the synthesized panel and its activity was the most influenced by the presence of iron. However, the presence of an additional hydroxamate group in DE itself, makes 6 a bis-hydroxamate overall, which could enhance its metal binding capability. Detailed studies related to whether conjugation of DE with siderophores might interfere with drug recognition and/or whether drug release is necessary for this class of antibiotics would be beneficial.

Pyoverdin & pyochelin antibiotic conjugates targeting Pseudomonas aeruginosa

P. aeruginosa is a ubiquitous Gram-negative bacterium and has emerged as an important nosocomial pathogen during the past several decades. Cystic fibrosis patients [21] or patients having a weakened immune system, such as those with burns and those having AIDS [22], are especially susceptible to fatal pseudomonal infections. Treatment is generally compromised since P. aeruginosa is highly resistant to most of the existing antibiotics and multidrug resistance is becoming more prevalent.

One major problem of antibiotic resistance in Gram-negative bacteria such as Pseudomonas is the low permeability of their outer membrane which serves as a barrier to prevent antibiotic uptake by passive diffusion [23]. Thus, exploitation of the pseudomonal iron transport system to promote active uptake of antibiotics is of considerable interest and, as described below, has proved to be effective.

The primary siderophore of P. aeruginosa is the fluorescent yellow–green pigment pyoverdin, although, like many other types of bacteria, it can also use a number of xenosiderophores. Different strains of P. aeruginosa very selectively recognize and utilize one of three pyoverdins (Types I, II and III) that are structural variants (Figure 5) [24]. This specificity of pyoverdin recognition makes P. aeruginosa an ideal candidate for sideophore-mediated drug delivery.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

The three types of pyoverdin of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Two pyoverdin–ampicillin conjugates were synthesized by Budzikiewicz et al. by selectively modifying the Lys residue in both type I pyoverdin analog and type II pyoverdin with a dicarboxylic acid linker (Figure 6) [25]. This long, flexible spacer was chosen to avoid any potential steric hindrance between the extensively modified ampicillin and its targeted bacterial transpeptidase as well as not to affect the outer membrane recognition by close attachment of the drug to the siderophore.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Type I and II pyoverdin ampicillin conjugates.

Conjugate 8 and 9 showed significant antibacterial activity against the corresponding pyoverdin producing P. aeruginosa strain. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values are 0.39 μM for 8 and 0.024 μM for 9, while P. aeruginosa is resistant to ampicillin alone. Detailed kinetic growth curve studies of conjugates 8 and 9 showed that the two conjugates could delay bacteria growth for approximately 16 h and eventually resulted in induction or selection of resistant mutants that were no longer susceptible to the conjugates. The conjugate-resistant mutants have impaired pyoverdin uptake systems and are expected to be less virulent since they are more prone to iron starvation. Similar phenomena were observed in studies of E. coli exposed to catechol-based siderophore–loracarbef conjugates [26].

A type I pyoverdin–cephalexin conjugate was reported by the same group [27]. The siderophore and the β-lactam were crosslinked by condensing the guanidine group of Arg residue with β-diketone 10 to form a pyrimidine ring that served as the ultimate linker (Figure 7). However, the conjugate had no antibacterial activity against the pyoverdin producing strain. Instead, it was actually a growth promoter, indicating that site of or mode of drug attachment to the siderophore may be crucial for conjugate activity. Since earlier studies indicate that β-lactam antibiotics do not need to be released from their respective siderophore conjugates to be active [25], these results imply that the chemical modification of the siderophore backbone used to prepare this conjugate interfered with siderophore recognition and transport.

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Cross-linking reaction of type I pyoverdin with cephalexin.

Hennard et al. reported syntheses and antibacterial assays of type I pyoverdin conjugates formed by attaching two quinolones, norfloxacin and benzonaphthyridone, with a non-labile simple amide linker and separately with a methylenedioxy-containing linker, which was anticipated to be susceptible to non-specific esterases or just randomly hydrolyzable (Figure 8) [28]. Use of the potentially releasable linker was expected to negate potential steric hindrance due to the presence of the pyoverdin moiety when the drugs interacted with their intracellular DNA gyrase target. The transport assays using 55Fe showed that all four conjugates were actively transported into the bacterial cells almost as efficiently as pyoverdin itself. Thus, modification of the natural succinyl group that is peripheral to the essential chromophore of the pyoverdins did not appear to affect the siderophore recognition and transport process. Furthermore, inhibition assays with the isolated gyrase of E. coli showed that the quinolone moiety of the conjugate inhibited the enzyme without being released from the pyoverdin. However, the conjugates were up to 50-times less active compared with parent quinonlones in the assay, probably due to steric hindrance caused by the presence of pyoverdin in the conjugates. Therefore, release of the antibiotic moiety was still highly preferred.

Figure 8.

Figure 8.

Pyoverdin and pyochelin-fluoroquinolone conjugates with stable or labile linkers.

In whole-cell assays with the P. aeruginosa strain ATCC 15692, conjugates 15 and 16 were found to be less active than the parent drug, most likely because of the decreased target recognition mentioned earlier or because the antibiotic actually did not reach its cellular target before pyoverdin was effluxed. Only conjugate 18 with a labile linker showed improved inhibition activity. However, the studies did not determine if the quinolone had been prematurely released due to the randomly hydrolyzable nature of the labile linker. Improvement of activity might require incorporation of a linker that could release the attached antibiotic from the conjugates in a controlled fashion by an intracellularly specific hydrolysis.

Another siderophore that P. aeruginosa synthesizes is pyochelin. Unlike pyoverdins, which are strain selective, pyochelin is used by all P. aeruginosa strains as a common sideophore, though it is responsible for only 5–10% of iron transport in the bacteria [29]. Therefore, conjugates using pyochelin as an antibiotic vector were anticipated to have broader antipseudomonal activity. A series of pyochelin–norfloxacin conjugates was synthesized and their bactericidal activity profile was found to be similar to the pyoverdin–norfloxacin conjugates 15 and 17 [30]. Growth curve studies indicated that only conjugates with the hydrolyzable linker 20 and 22 showed activity comparable to norfloxacin itself against P. aeruginosa while conjugates 19 and 21 with non-hydrolyzable linkers were inactive. Other than pyoverdin and pyochelin, using citrate as an exogenous siderophore to deliver antibiotic into P. aeruginosa and other Gram-negative bacteria such as E. coli has proved to be less effective, presumably because of the decreased iron affinity of the modified citrate [31].

Catecholate–aminopenicillin conjugates targeting Gram-negative bacteria

To initiate one of the most comprehensive studies of siderophore-based Trojan Horse antibiotics, Möllmann’s group at the Han-Knoell Institute (HKI, Jena, Germany) prepared a large number of penicillin conjugates with totally synthetic biomimetic siderophore analogs [3234] (Figure 9). These unnatural, but rationally designed, iron-chelators containing biscatecholate, triscatecholate and/or substituted hydroxamates were first tested for their siderophore activity. The most effective growth promoters were selected as active transport vectors and coupled with various β-lactams such as ampicillin and amoxicillin.

Figure 9.

Figure 9.

Siderophore–aminopenicillin conjugates.

A clever novel feature of these conjugates was use of protected catecholates that were expected to serve as prodrugs to the required iron binding catechols while circumventing potential methylation by a catechol O-methyltransferase that would lead to a permanent loss of effective iron binding ability necessary for siderophore activity [35]. Impressively, preliminary testing against laboratory reference P. aeruginosa strains showed that conjugates 2327 were ≥1000-fold more active relative to ampicillin! Further testing against clinically isolated aminopenicillin resistant strains of P. aeruginosa revealed that these unique conjugates were remarkably active, with a typical MIC below 0.25 μg/ml. Furthermore, unlike β-lactams, the conjugates were equally active against wild type and efflux pump overproducing strains like MexAB-OprM, MexCD-OprJ or MexEF-OprN. Thus, the conjugates circumvented efflux, a major cause of antibiotic resistance. Finally, in vivo studies showed that conjugates 23–27 effectively cured P. aeruginosa infections in mice with ED50 values comparable to the quinolone ofloxacin and low toxicity was observed. Taken together, the design, syntheses and combined in vitro and in vivo studies of these novel conjugates clearly demonstrate the tremendous potential of sideromycins for development of much needed microbe-selective antibiotic therapy.

Synthesis & biological studies of siderophore–lantibiotic conjugates

All of the siderophore conjugates described earlier incorporated relatively low MW antibiotics, that most often were independently active and capable of being assimilated by passive diffusion. No systematic study has determined the size limitations of siderophore conjugates. The isolation and structure determination of microcins, natural sideromycins containing antibiotic peptides that are significantly larger (~84 mer) than the siderophore core, suggest tremendous potential for active transport of many types of biomolecules, regardless of size. To test this potential versatility, the Vederas group prepared conjugates of the lantibiotic gallidermin to target Gram-negative bacteria [36]. Lantibiotics are a class of post-translationally modified antimicrobial peptides produced by some Gram-positive bacteria with potent antibacterial activity against other Gram-positive bacteria [37,38]. They are active in very low concentrations by either inhibiting peptidoglycan biosynthesis or by forming cell membrane pores that lead to leakage and cell death. However, the inability to penetrate the outer membranes of Gram-negative bacteria significantly limits their potential. Syntheses and studies of conjugates of lantibiotics with Gram-negative selected siderophores were anticipated to not only test size limits of iron transport-mediated drug delivery in Gram-negative bacteria, but also if recognition of the lantibiotic by its target would tolerate the incorporated siderophore component.

The lysine constituents of the lantibiotic gallidermin were separately attached to pyochelin 28, agrobactin 29 and desferrioxamine (DFO) B 30 by dimethylsquarate linkages (Figure 10). The resulting conjugates, 31–35, retained their activity against several Gram-positive indicator strains. However, they were not active against Gram-negative bacteria and actually promoted the growth of some strains. The growth promotion observed suggests that either the conjugates were able to penetrate the outer membrane of the cells, but modified lantibiotic was not active or that the conjugates served to solubilize iron, which then was exchanged with the naturally produced siderophores. More studies to determine the cause of inactivity would be of interest.

Figure 10.

Figure 10.

Lantibiotic gallidermin–siderophore conjugates.

Synthesis & studies of a mycobactin–artemisinin conjugate that is selectively potent against both tuberculosis & malaria

In 2011, Miller et al. reported the synthesis of a mycobactin–artemisinin conjugate 36 with potent anti-tuberculosis (TB) and antimalaria activity (Figure 11) [39]. Mycobactin T, the intracellular siderophore of M. tuberculosis does not have a site for structural modification. However, chemical synthesis allowed the incorporation of an amino moiety for derivatization. Artemisinin, a naturally-derived drug, and its semi-synthetic analogs have been used for the treatment of malaria. However, artemisinin displays no anti-TB activity by itself. It was hypothesized that if artemisinin could be sequestered by M. tuberculosis, the redox chemistry associated with reductive removal of the iron from the mycobacterial siderophore might initiate Fenton chemistry to intracellularly produce free radicals that would be lethal to the assimilating bacteria. Despite the apparently labile structure of this drug, the molecule is robust enough for chemical modification and a conjugate was able to be synthesized to test this intriguing hypothesis. Gratifyingly, the synthetic mycobactin–artemisinin conjugate was found to be a potent anti-TB agent with an MIC of 0.39 μg/ml against Mtb H37Rv. More extensive testing revealed remarkable activity against various multidrug-resistant strains (MIC = 1.25–0.16 μg/ml and even extensive drug resistant strains (MIC = 0.625–0.078 μg/ml). To determine if conjugation of the artemsinin to the mycobactin would eliminate antimalarial activity, it was tested against several strains of P. falciparum (malaria) and found to essentially retain the same low nanomolar activity of artemisinin itself. Since the conjugate was designed to be selective for Mtb because of the exquisite recognition of the mycobactin component, it was tested against a broad panel of bacteria and, as expected, no other activity was observed. This example of using a conjugate with a drug that had no anti-TB activity itself, but with a potential target if it could be assimilated by using a microbe-selective delivery agent provided a clear example of the tremendous potential of siderophore–drug conjugates for generation of bacteria-specific antibiotic delivery agents. To re-emphasize this remarkable selectivity, all the other synthetic intermediates, and artemisinin itself, did not have any anti-TB activity. When an O-benzyl-protected hydroxamate intermediate was tested, the antimalarial activity decreased between 20–100-fold and all anti-TB activity was lost, stressing the importance of iron-binding. In a comparative study, the corresponding DFO–artemisinin conjugate was prepared and shown to retain some antimalarial activity, albeit lower than artemisinin itself, but it had no anti-TB activity. This was expected since Mtb does not use DFO as a siderophore. Physicochemical assays showed that, as hypothesized, the mycobactin conjugate did undergo the expected Fenton chemistry and whole-cell studies with live Mtb demonstrated that it did induce formation of reactive oxygen species intracellularly. Thus, a single conjugate was successfully and rationally designed to inhibit proliferation of two of the most significant diseases known.

Figure 11.

Figure 11.

Mycobactin–artemisinin conjugate.

Siderophore–monobactam conjugates are active against MDR Gram-negative bacteria

Natural and synthetic siderophore analogs most often contain three bidentate ligands for stoichiometric binding of iron (III). Attempts to reduce this inherent complexity have encouraged syntheses and studies of lower valent conjugates, including incorporation of a single bidentate ligand, usually a catechol, a hydroxypyridone or a hydroxamic acid, which is covalently attached to a drug. A large number of such simplified conjugates have been synthesized since the 1980s and, as with other conjugates, most incorporate β-lactam antibiotics [10,40,41]. Syntheses of monobactams with hydroxypyridone iron chelating groups such as MC-1 (37) [42,43] and BAL30072 (39) [4446] were recently reported and their antibacterial activities were extensively studied (Figure 12). Monobactams such as aztreonam 40 have advantages over classical penicillins and cephalosporins since they are highly resistant to hydrolysis by class B metallo-β-lactamases and are potent inhibitors of class C β-lactamases [47,48]. Hydroxypyridones are isosteres of catechols and they are specifically recognized by the Cir and Fiu outer membrane proteins of bacteria after binding iron. Unlike catechols, they are not substrates for catechol-O-methyl-transferase, so the use of prodrugs previously mentioned to circumvent this deactivating process was not anticipated to be necessary. Since monobactams tolerate extensive peripheral modification, attachment of siderophore components was expected to promote penetration of the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria and increase drug concentration in the periplasm.

Figure 12.

Figure 12.

Monobactams MC-1, U-78608, BAL30072 and aztreonam.

MC-1 (37) was developed based on the previously reported Upjohn monobactam U-78608 (38). Both 37 and 38 exhibited excellent activity against Gram-negative bacteria including clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa, with MIC90 values 2 and 0.5 μg/ml, respectively. Crystallographic studies revealed that 37 binds to PBP3 efficiently in P. aeruginosa [43]. However, with a polar diol side chain on the triazalone, 37 showed a significant reduction of plasma protein binding compared with 38, thus, increasing its concentration in tissue. MC-1 (37) exhibited superior protection in an in vivo model of respiratory tract infection with P. aeruginosa 1091–05, with PD50 values of 20.6 versus >150 mg/kg for U-78608 (38). This is important because lungs are frequently the sites of infection of some nosocomial Gram-negative pathogens such as P. aeruginosa.

Similar to MC-1, BAL30072 (39) is a sulfactam with a dihydropyridone moiety, which was designed to promote conjugate influx across the Gram-negative outer membrane. BAL30072 displayed potent activity against multidrug-resistant (MDR) P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp. isolates, including many carbapenem-resistant strains. The MIC90 values were 4 μg/ml for MDR Acinetobacter spp. and 8 μg/ml for MDR P. aeruginosa, while the MIC90 of meropenem for the same sets of isolates was >32 μg/ml. Further study found that in a time-kill study against MDR Acinetobacter baumannii, combining BAL30072 with meropenem lowered the bactericidal concentrations two- to eightfold, compared with using meropenem or BAL30072 alone.

The potential of a DFO–gallium complex as an anti-pseudomonal therapeutic agent

Non-iron siderophore–metal complexes have also been explored as potential Trojan Horses. Rogers et al. reported the use of scandium and indium complexes of enterobactin to inhibit growth of E. coli [49]. Kaneko et al. reported that Ga(NO3)3 inhibited growth of P. aeruginosa in vitro and as biofilm, presumably by disrupting the iron metabolism of the pathogen [50]. More recently, Banin et al. expanded this idea by reporting the use of the siderophore DFO, to deliver gallium rather than iron to P. aeruginosa and observe its effect [51]. The rationale behind their design being that Pseudomonas is believed to possess two pathways for uptake of the DFO–Fe3+ complex, thus, DFO might effectively be used as a Trojan Horse to deliver the Ga3+ ion and induce iron starvation. Their results demonstrated that both the DFO–Ga3+ complex and GaCl3 inhibited growth of the organism, while DFO alone did not, even when tested at a maximum concentration of 1 mM. When compared with antibiotic gentamicin, the DFO–Ga3+ complex was 10–100-times more effective, and when gentamicin was combined with DFO–Ga3+, the growth was synergistically decreased by sixfold. Growth studies using siderophore-transporter mutants revealed that as long as one of the DFO–Fe3+ uptake paths was available to the organism, the Ga3+ complex remained effective, and only when both uptake mechanisms were eliminated, was a reduced sensitivity observed. Also when these agents were tested at sub-MIC levels, only DFO–Ga3+ and GaCl3 (0.001 mM) were capable of inhibiting growth, whereas neither DFO nor Gm alone did. DFO–Ga3+ was also effective in blocking biofilm formation and killing mature preformed biofilm. The gallium complex was also tested against 15 clinical isolates of Pseudomonas and all were found to be sensitive to DFO–Ga3+. Considering the organism has two uptake methods for this siderophore, development of resistance was expected to possibly be more complicated. The details about the mode of action of the gallium complexes are still being investigated.

Siderophore conjugates as potential diagnostic agents for prostate cancer

In 2007, Ding et al. reported the syntheses of inhibitors of N-acetylated α-linked acidic dipeptidase (NAALADase), a protease involved in the release of glutamate in the brain [52]. A protein having NAALADase activity, the prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA), is expressed very early in prostate cancer. Conjugation of PSMA inhibitors with siderophores is of particular interest since the conjugates could be employed as contrast agents for prostate-derived cancer cells detection by means of MRI. A NAALADase inhibitor, 2-PMPA, was used as a template to develop the trihydroxamate-based siderophore–PMPA conjugate 41 (Figure 13). Conjugate 41 displayed strong NAALADase inhibitory activity with IC50 = 5 nM, with abilities in formation of Fe3+ or Gd3+ complexes for further MRI experiments. In 2008, Ding et al. reported the synthesis of a modified siderophore-conjugate 42, which incorporated a linker to prevent interaction of the carboxylic acids in the PSMA inhibitors and the metal binding siderophore moiety. The inhibitory activity of this conjugate was retained at IC50 = 4 nM [53].

Figure 13.

Figure 13.

Siderophore conjugate: potential diagnostic agent for prostate cancer.

A novel near-IR fluorescent integrin-targeted DFO analog

Another use of siderophores is in combination with various fluorescent molecules for in vivo and in vitro imaging. Fluorescent probes based on bidentate iron chelators have been applied in detection of labile iron in primary hepatocytes [54]. More recently, Ye et al. reported the development of an integrin-targeted near-IR (NIR) fluorescent probe in conjugation with the siderophore DFO as an optical contrast agent [55]. The authors evaluated the use of cypate (Figure 14), a NIR active compound, previously reported to have excellent spectral properties and employed to label diverse peptides as well as other bioactive molecules [56], and cyclo[RGDfK(~)], a small cyclic peptide that targets the cell surface receptor (integrin αVβ3) ABIR with high affinity and selectivity. The over-expression of ABIR has been correlated with tumor growth, invasion and metastasis and, therefore, constitutes an attractive molecular target for specific imaging, diagnosis and therapy. Three conjugates were assembled, DFO-cypate-cyclo[RGDfK(~)] 43 (Figure 14), cypate-cyclo[RGDfK(~)] 44 and cypate-DFO, and studied to determine the ability of cyclo[RGDfK(~)] to transport DFO into the tumors, the effect of the siderophore on the biological activity of the conjugates and the potential modulation of the fluorescent NIR probe due to the chelating capabilities of DFO. Metal binding studies were carried out using 13 different metal ions, among which the fully elaborated conjugate 43 showed high affinity for Al3+, Fe3+ and Ga3+, indicating that chelation by the siderophore remained viable after the assembly.

Figure 14.

Figure 14.

Near-IR fluorescent integrin-targeted siderophore conjugate.

With the exception of Fe2+, Fe3+ and Cu2+, addition of metals did not change the probe’s green color. And based on the affinity results, the Fe complexes were presumed to quench fluorescence by a photo-induced electron transfer mechanism, while the Cu2+ complex did so by interaction with cypate. Ga3+ seemed to enhance the light emission of the conjugate, as expected since it has been used in other nuclear imaging studies.

ABIR binding studies showed that incorporation of DFO in 43 diminished the receptor affinity of the reference compound 44 by a twofold factor, but the resulting affinity was comparable to that of the cyclo [RGDfK(~)] peptide alone. Cell internalization experiments showed that both 43 and 44 internalized rapidly into ABIR-positive cells within 1 h post-incubation and remained in the intracellular space for up to 10 h. In contrast, DFO itself had difficulty crossing cell membranes without a mechanism of penetration.

Use of siderophore–protein carrier conjugates in the development of bacterial vaccines

Bergeron and co-workers realized that covalently linking siderophore analogues to siderophore bacterial outer-membrane receptors represents a credible target for bacterial vaccine development [57]. Therefore, vibriobactin (VIB), a siderophore responsible for iron utilization in Vibrio Cholerae, fixed to large carrier proteins ovalbumin (OVA) and bovine serum albumin, respectively, were synthesized with a thiol tether (Figure 15). The resulting OVA–VIB conjugate 45 was successfully used as an antigen to raise antibodies in mice. Further studies showed that the antigenic determinants of the antibody were associated with the VIB rather than with the carrier proteins. IgG monoclonal antibodies specific to the VIB fragment of the bovine serum albumin and OVA conjugates were also isolated. Furthermore, studies to evaluate the antibodies’ potential in a vibrio-infected animal model would be of great interest.

Figure 15.

Figure 15.

Vibriobactin–ovalbumin and vibrobactin–bovine serum-albumin conjugates from vibriobactin thiol.

Use of siderophores for pathogen detection & diagnostics

Diagnostic processes are desperately needed for rapid and effective identification of bacteria in infections to facilitate proper treatment. Since many siderophores are microbe selective, their use as affinity probes for selective bacteria is under consideration. Covalent attachment of metal-bound siderophores to surfaces or absorbents with appropriate linkers may allow recognition of bacterial outer membrane siderophore receptors and with consequent selective absorbance of the targeted bacteria. The immobilized bacteria might then be observed and identified by microscopic techniques or detected by other devices. The result could be a faster, cheaper, more portable and accurate method for pathogen diagnosis relative to traditional microbiological methods, which often take several days to complete.

Low et al. developed such a device for detection of P. aeruginosa by coating pyoverdin onto a gold-plated glass chip (Figure 16) [58]. After exposure of the chip to a P. aeruginosa containing solution, the bacteria were visualized by darkfield microscopy. The detection limit was as low as 102 bacteria/ml and at higher bacteria concentration, the captured bacteria could be observed within 1 min. As a demonstration of the selectivity of this siderophore-based detection process, other bacteria such as E. coli and Y. enterocolitica were not able to be captured on the pseudomonal selective chip. Immobilization of Microbacterium flavescens with an artificial hydroxamate siderophore on a gold electrode was also reported [59]. The bacteria absorption was observed by optical, scanning electron and atomic force microscopy as well as quartz crystal microbalance method.

Figure 16.

Figure 16.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa detection by pyoverdin-coated chips.

Future perspective

Siderophores are an important class of natural products that have received wide attention for many years due to their unique properties as iron chelators and potential use in drug delivery, imaging and, most recently, in diagnostics. Significant advances have been made in the past decade, but additional studies and applications show promise for extended utility. Further appropriately designed studies will demonstrate the scope and limitations of the use of siderophores as active transport vehicles that may circumvent cell permeability and/or drug efflux problems associated with drug-resistant strains of bacteria. Advances in X-ray crystallography have revealed structures of a number of outer membrane receptors and will certainly have an impact on the field of siderophore research by, for example, determination of the proper modification sites on siderophores for drug attachment to ensure active transport [36]. Further attention in the development of controlled drug release processes from siderophore–antibiotic conjugates will expand the drug profiles and types of intracellular targets that can be considered. In addition, siderophore metal complexes and conjugates have considerable potential for use as targeted contrast agents and new pathogen detection devices. Successful development of siderophore–drug conjugates and siderophore-based diagnostic device will facilitate microbe selective, personalized antibiotic therapies that will slow the inevitable development of antibiotic resistance and help keep us one step ahead in the never ending microbial war.

Key Terms.

Siderophore

Low MW iron chelators synthesized and secreted by microbes to sequester and solubilize iron from the environment.

Sideromycins

Siderophore conjugates consisting of a metal-binding portion, a spacer or linker, and a drug moiety.

Siderophore conjugates

Combinations of various functionalized molecules (e.g., drug or fluorescent probe) ligated onto siderophores to achieve the designed purpose (e.g., microbial drug delivery, bacterial detection or diagnosis, cancer cell recognition).

Executive summary.

  • Iron acquisition has been proven to play an essential role in microbial virulence and pathogenicity. Investigation of microbial iron transport system led to the invention of siderophore–drug conjugates as a promising ‘Trojan Horse’ approach that uses active iron-transport processes to deliver antimicrobial agents.

  • Studies on the use of siderophores for development of imaging agents and pathogen detection devices have provided great opportunities for future application of these versatile microbial iron chelators.

Footnotes

Financial & competing interests disclosure

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.

References

  • 1.Miethke M, Marahiel MA. Siderophore-based iron acquisition and pathogen control. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev 71(3), 413–451 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chu BC, Garcia-Herrero A, Johanson TH et al. Siderophore uptake in bacteria and the battle for iron with the host; a bird’s eye view. Biometals 23(4), 601–611 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Crosa JH, Mey AR, Payne SM. Iron Transport in Bacteria. (ASM) Press, Washington, DC, USA: (2004). [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Crumbliss AL, Harrington JM. Iron sequestration by small molecules: thermodynamic and kinetic studies of natural siderophores and synthetic model compounds In: Advances in Inorganic Chemistry, (Volume 61) Metal Ion Controlled Reactivity, Vaneldik R, Hubbard CD (Eds). Elsevier Academic Press Inc, San Diego, USA: 179–250 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sandy M, Butler A. Microbial iron acquisition: marine and terrestrial siderophores. Chem. Rev 109(10), 4580–4595 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hider RC, Kong XL. Chemistry and biology of siderophores. Nat. Prod. Rep 27(5), 637–657 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Braun V, Hantke K. Recent insights into iron import by bacteria. Curr. Opin Chem. Biol 15(2), 328–334 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wencewicz TA. Development of microbe-selective antibacterial agents: from small molecules to siderophores. Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Notre Dame, IN, USA: (2011). [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Braun V, Pramanik A, Gwinner T, Koeberle M, Bohn E. Sideromycins: tools and antibiotics. Biometals 22(1), 3–13 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Roosenberg JM, Lin YM, Lu Y, Miller MJ. Studies and syntheses of siderophores, microbial iron chelators and analogs as potential drug delivery agents. Curr. Med. Chem 7(2), 159–197 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hartmann A, Fiedler HP, Braun V. Uptake and conversion of the antibiotic albomycin by Escherichia coli K-12. Eur. J. Biochem 99(3), 517–524 (1979). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Braun V, Günthner K, Hantke K, Zimmermann L. Intracellular activation of albomycin in Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium. J. Bacteriol 156(1), 308–315 (1983). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Nolan EM, Walsh CT. Investigations of the MceIJ-catalyzed posttranslational modification of the microcin E492 C-terminus: linkage of ribosomal and nonribosomal peptides to form ‘Trojan Horse’ antibiotics. Biochemistry 47(35), 9289–9299 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Duquesne S, Destoumieux-Garzon D, Peduzzi J, Rebuffat S. Microcins, gene-encoded antibacterial peptides from enterobacteria. Nat. Prod. Rep 24(4), 708–734 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Vertesy L, Aretz W, Fehlhaber HW, Kogler H. Salmycin A-D, antibiotics from streptomyces violaceus, DSM 8286 having a siderophore aminoglycoside structure. Helv. Chim. Acta 78(1), 46–60 (1995). [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Roosenberg JM, Miller MJ. Total synthesis of the siderophore danoxamine. J. Org. Chem 65(16), 4833–4838 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Dong L, Roosenberg JM, Miller MJ. Total synthesis of desferrisalmycin B. J. Am. Chem. Soc 124(50), 15001–15005 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Möllmann U, Dong L, Vertesy L, Miller MJ. Salmycins-natural siderophore-drug conjugates: prospects for modification and investigation based on successful total synthesis. Presented at: The 2nd international Biometals symposium Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany (2004). [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wencewicz TA, Möllmann U, Long TE, Miller MJ. Is drug release necessary for antimicrobial activity of siderophore-drug conjugates? Syntheses and biological studies of the naturally occurring salmycin ‘Trojan Horse’ antibiotics and synthetic desferridanoxamine-antibiotic conjugates. Biometals 22(4), 633–648 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bernier G, Girijavallabhan V, Murray A et al. Desketoneoenactin-siderophore conjugates for Candida: evidence of iron transport-dependent species selectivity. Antimicrob. Agents Chemo 49(1), 241–248 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Irvin RT, Govan JW, Fyfe JA, Coster ton JW. Heterogeneity of antibiotic-resistance in mucoid isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa obtained from cystic fibrosis patients: role of outer membrane proteins. Antimicrob. Agents Chemo 19(6), 1056–1063 (1981). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Meynard JL, Barbut F, Guiguet M et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in human immunodeficiency virus infected patients. J. Infection 38(3), 176–181 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nikaido H, Nikaido K, Harayama S. Identification and characterization of porins in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Biol Chem 266(2), 770–779 (1991). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Meyer JM, Stintzi A, Devos D et al. Use of siderophores to type pseudomonads: The three Pseudomonas aeruginosa pyoverdine systems. Microbiology 143, 35–43 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kinzel O, Tappe R, Gerus I, Budzikiewicz H. The synthesis and antibacterial activity of two pyoverdin-ampicillin conjugates, entering Pseudomonas aeruginosa via the pyoverdin-mediated iron uptake pathway. J. Antibiotics 51(5), 499–507 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ghosh A, Ghosh M, Niu C, Malouin F, Möllmann U, Miller MJ. Iron transport-mediated drug delivery using mixed-ligand siderophore-β-lactam conjugates. Chem. Biol 3(12), 1011–1019 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kinzel O, Budzikiewicz H. Synthesis and biological evaluation of a pyoverdin-β-lactam conjugate: a new type of arginine-specific crosslinking in aqueous solution. J. Pep. Res 53(6), 618–625 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hennard C, Truong QC, Desnottes JF, Paris JM, Moreau NJ, Abdallah MA. Synthesis and activities of pyoverdin-quinolone adducts: a prospective approach to a specific therapy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Med. Chem 44(13), 2139–2151 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ankenbauer R, Sriyosachati S, Cox CD. Effects of siderophores on the growth of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in human serum and transferrin. Infect. Immun 49(1), 132–140 (1985). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Rivault F, Liebert C, Burger A et al. Synthesis of pyochelin-norfloxacin conjugates. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett 17(3), 640–644 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Md-Saleh SR, Chilvers EC, Kerr KG et al. Synthesis of citrate-ciprofloxacin conjugates. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett 19(5), 1496–1498 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Heinisch L, Wittmann S, Stoiber T, Berg A, Ankel-Fuchs D, Möllmann U. Highly antibacterial active aminoacyl penicillin conjugates with acylated bis-catecholate siderophores based on secondary diamino acids and related compounds. J. Med. Chem 45(14), 3032–3040 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Heinisch L, Wittmann S, Stoiber T, Scherlitz-Hofmann I, Ankel-Fuchs D, Möllmann U. Synthesis and biological activity of tris- and tetrakiscatecholate siderophores based on poly-aza alkanoic acids or alkylbenzoic acids and their conjugates with β-lactam antibiotics. Arzneimittel Forschung Drug Res. 53(3), 188–195 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wittmann S, Schnabelrauch M, Scherlitz-Hofmann I, Möllmann U, Ankel-Fuchs D, Heinisch L. New synthetic siderophores and their β-lactam conjugates based on diamino acids and dipeptides. Bioorg. Med. Chem 10(6), 1659–1670 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ohi N, Aoki B, Kuroki T, Matsumoto M, Kojima K, Nehashi T. Semisynthetic β-lactam antibiotics III. Effect on antibacterial activity and COMT-susceptibility of chlorine-introduction into the catechol nucleus of 6-(R)-2–3-(3,4-dihydroxybenzoyl)-3-(3-hydroxypropyl)-1-ureido-2-pheny lacetamido penicillanic acid. J. Antibiotics 40(1), 22–28 (1987). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Yoganathan S, Sit CS, Vederas JC. Chemical synthesis and biological evaluation of gallidermin-siderophore conjugates. Org. Biomol. Chem 9(7), 2133–2141 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Willey JM, Van Der Donk WA. Lantibiotics: peptides of diverse structure and function. Ann. Rev. Microbiol 61, 477–501 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kellner R, Jung G, Horner T et al. Gallidermin - a new lanthionine-containing polypeptide antibiotic. Eur. J. Biochem 177(1), 53–59 (1988). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Miller MJ, Walz AJ, Zhu H et al. Design, synthesis, and study of a mycobactin–artemisinin conjugate that has selective and potent activity against tuberculosis and malaria. J. Am. Chem. Soc 133(7), 2076–2079 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kline T, Fromhold M, Mckennon TE et al. Antimicrobial effects of novel siderophores linked to β-lactam antibiotics. Bioorg. Med. Chem 8(1), 73–93 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Buynak JD. The discovery and development of modified penicillin- and cephalosporin-derived β-lactamase inhibitors. Curr. Med. Chem 11(14), 1951–1964 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Flanagan ME, Brickner SJ, Lall M et al. Preparation, Gram-negative antibacterial activity, and hydrolytic stability of novel siderophore-conjugated monocarbam diols. Acs. Med. Chem. Lett 2(5), 385–390 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Han S, Zaniewski RP, Marr ES et al. Structural basis for effectiveness of siderophore-conjugated monocarbams agains clinically relevant strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107(51) 22002–22007 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Mima T, Kvitko BH, Rholl DA, Page MGP, Desarbre E, Schweizer HP. In vitro activity of BAL30072 against Burkholderia pseudomallei Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 38(2), 157–159 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Page MGP, Dantier C, Desarbre E. In vitro properties of BAL30072, a novel siderophore sulfactam with activity against multiresistant Gram-negative bacilli. Antimicrob. Agents Chemo 54(6), 2291–2302 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Russo TA, Page MGP, Beanan JM et al. In vivo and in vitro activity of the siderophore monosulfactam BAL30072 against Acinetobacter baumannii. J. Antimicrob. Chemo 66(4), 867–873 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Barry AL, Thornsberry C, Jones RN, Gavan TL. Aztreonam-antibacterial activity β-lactamase stability, and interpretive standards and quality control guidelines for disk-diffusion susceptibility tests. Rev. Infect. Dis 7, S594–S604 (1985). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Jones RN, Barry AL, Thornsberry C, Fuchs PC, Packer RR. The antimicrobial activity, β-lactamase stability, and disk diffusion susceptibility testing of carumonam (RO 17–2301, AMA-1080), a new monobactam. Am. J. Clin. Pathol 86(5), 608–618 (1986). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Rogers HJ, Woods VE, Synge C. Antibacterial effect of the scandium and indium complexes of enterochelin on Escherichia coli. J. Gen. Microbiol 128, 2389–2394 (1982). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kaneko Y, Thoendel M, Olakanmi O, Britigan BE, Singh PK. The transition metal gallium disrupts Pseudomonas aeruginosa iron metabolism and has antimicrobial and antibiofilm activity. J. Clin. Invest 117(4), 877–888 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Banin E, Lozinski A, Brady KM et al. The potential of desferrioxamine-gallium as an anti-Pseudomonas therapeutic agent. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105(43), 16761–16766 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ding PY, Helquist P, Miller MJ. Design, synthesis and pharmacological activity of novel enantiomerically pure phosphonic acid-based NAALADase inhibitors. Org. Biomol. Chem 5(5), 826–831 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ding PY, Helquist P, Miller MJ. Design and synthesis of a siderophore conjugate as a potent PSMA inhibitor and potential diagnostic agent for prostate cancer. Bioorg. Med. Chem 16(4), 1648–1657 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Ma YM, De Groot H, Liu ZD, Hider RC, Petrat F. Chelation and determination of labile iron in primary hepatocytes by pyridinone fluorescent probes. Biochem. J 395, 49–55 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Ye Y, Bloch S, Xu B, Achilefu S. Novel near-infrared fluorescent integrin-targeted DFO analogue. Bioconj. Chem 19(1), 225–234 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ye Y, Bloch S, Kao J, Achilefu S. Multivalent carbocyanine molecular probes: synthesis and applications. Bioconj. Chem 16(1), 51–61 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Bergeron RJ, Bharti N, Singh S, Mcmanis JS, Wiegand J, Green LG. Vibriobactin antibodies: a vaccine strategy. J. Med. Chem 52(12), 3801–3813 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Doorneweerd DD, Henne WA, Reifenberger RG, Low PS. Selective capture and identification of pathogenic bacteria using an immobilized siderophore. Langmuir 26(19), 15424–15429 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Inomata T, Eguchi H, Matsumoto K, Funahashi Y, Ozawa T, Masuda H. Adsorption of microorganisms onto an artificial siderophore-modified Au substrate. Biosensors Bioelectronics 23(5), 751–755 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES