Past
Esophagectomy following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) remains standard treatment for patients with potentially curable locally advanced esophageal cancer (EC). In the CROSS study with carboplatin/paclitaxel and 41.4 Gy/23 × 1.8 Gy, a pathologic complete response was achieved in 23% and 49% of patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), respectively.1
However, high-aged patients and those with severe comorbidity are faced with considerable high postoperative morbidity and mortality.2 In these patients, who are medically unfit for surgery, definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) would be a good alternative curative-intended treatment.3 Most studies in the past explored the usefulness of cisplatin-based regimen according to the RTOG 85-01 landmark study. Recent studies have shown more or less equal results of carboplatin/paclitaxel-based dCRT. In contrast with ESCC, data concerning the efficacy of dCRT in EAC are still lacking. Besides some recommendation, age and comorbidity are not clearly implemented in current treatment guideline of patients with EC.4,5
Present
Many elderly patients have multiple age-associated comorbidities, limiting the use of current combined treatment with either nCRT or dCRT. In our study age ≥ 75 years and multiple comorbidities were associated with a higher probability for dCRT. Approximately 78% of these elderly patients were treated with dCRT.6 The strongest associations were found for the combination of hypertension plus diabetes and the combination of cardiovascular with pulmonary comorbidity. The results of this population-based study support the administration of dCRT in patients with ESCC having at least two comorbidities or being older than 75 years. This was seen particularly among those with cardiovascular diseases or previous malignancies, because their overall survival after dCRT was comparable to the overall survival for patients after nCRT plus surgery. However, in operable patients with locally advanced EAC, the use of nCRT plus surgery was associated with a better overall survival regardless of age, number, and type of pretreatment comorbidities.
Future
In a selected group of elderly patients following dCRT, good results are reported with complete responses (58–68%) and 2-year survival rates of 36–64% against acceptable ≥ grade 3 toxicity (24–36%).7 Several studies have stressed better results with dCRT in ESCC and the use of carboplatin/paclitaxel regimen with less toxicity and similar results compared with cisplatin-based dCRT.8,9
As functional rather than chronological older age is decisive for a proper treatment decision-making, comprehensive geriatric assessment is required in multidisciplinary tumor boards. Moreover, the increased risk of postoperative treatment-related morbidity and mortality in these patients is associated with the frailty index. Although there is no consensus on the definition of frailty and standardized cutoff points, comprehensive frailty testing facilitates an individualized preoperative risk assessment, while improving clinical outcome.10
Promising strategies are the use of biomarkers in combined chemoimmunotherapy as (neo)adjuvant,11 whereas improved outcome and less toxicity might be achieved by up-to-date radiation techniques, including intensity-modulated radiotherapy and proton therapy.12
DISCLOSURE
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Footnotes
ASO Author Reflections is a brief invited commentary on the article, “Impact of age and comorbidity on choice and outcome of two different treatment options for patients with potentially curable esophageal cancer.” Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26:986–95. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1245/s10434-019-07181-6.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(22):2074–2084. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1112088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.van Gestel YR, Lemmens VE, de Hingh IH, et al. Influence of comorbidity and age on 1-, 2-, and 3-month postoperative mortality rates in gastrointestinal cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(2):371–380. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2663-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Stahl M, Stuschke M, Lehmann N, et al. Chemoradiation with and without surgery in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(10):2310–2317. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.00.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Tougeron D, Scotté M, Hamidou, et al. Definitive chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma: an alternative to surgery? J Surg Oncol. 2012;105(8):761–766. doi: 10.1002/jso.22157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kristjansson SR, Nesbakken A, Jordhøy MS, et al. Comprehensive geriatric assessment can predict complications in elderly patients after elective surgery for colorectal cancer: a prospective observational cohort study. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2010;76(3):208–217. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2009.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Faiz Z, van Putten M, Verhoeven RHA, et al. Impact of age and comorbidity on choice and outcome of two different treatment options for patients with potentially curable esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26:986–995. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07181-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Tougeron D, Di Fiore F, Thureau S, et al. Safety and outcome of definitive chemoradiotherapy in elderly patients with oesophageal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2008;99(10):1586–1592. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Best LM, Mughal M, Gurusamy KS. Nonsurgical versus surgical treatment for oesophageal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;3:CD011498. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011498.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Honing J, Smit JK, Muijs CT, et al. A comparison of carboplatin and paclitaxel with cisplatinum and 5-fluorouracil in definitive chemoradiation in esophageal cancer patients. Ann Oncol. 2014;25(3):638–643. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ethun CG, Bilen MA, Jani AB, et al. Frailty and cancer: implications for oncology surgery, medical oncology, and radiation oncology. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(5):362–377. doi: 10.3322/caac.21406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kelly RJ. Immunotherapy for esophageal and gastric cancer. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2017;37:292–300. doi: 10.14694/EDBK_175231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Welsh J, Gomez D, Palmer MB, et al. Intensity-modulated proton therapy further reduces normal tissue exposure during definitive therapy for locally advanced distal esophageal tumours: a dosimetric study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;81(5):1336–1342. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.07.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]