Abstract
Apoptosis is a form of programmed cell death in multicellular organisms. Bcl-2 prevents apoptosis and promotes cellular survival by neutralizing BH3 domain-containing proteins, which directly activate the pore-forming proteins BAX and BAK. However, Bcl-2 is not known to regulate other cell death effectors such as gasdermin D (GSDMD) or mixed lineage kinase domain-like (MLKL), whose activation causes pyroptosis and necroptosis, respectively. Here, we identify a BH3-like domain in both GSDMD and MLKL that mediates an interaction with B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2). The presence of Bcl-2 reduced GSDMD cleavage at D275 by caspase-1, 4 or 5, and enhanced the GSDMD cleavage at D87. The GSDMD D87 cleavage inactivates the pyroptotic execution program. The presence of Bcl-2 also limited RIP3 mediated phosphorylation of MLKL, which reduced MLKL oligomerization and tempered the induction of necroptosis. Our observations suggest that the presence of Bcl-2 limits the induction of three forms of cell death apoptosis, pyroptosis, and necroptosis.
Subject terms: Necroptosis, Immune cell death
Introduction
Apoptosis helps preserve tissue homeostasis and is obligatory for normal embryonic development1. The downregulation of apoptosis can contribute to tumorigenesis, while its upregulation functionally impacts the severity of a variety of infectious, neurodegenerative, and autoimmune diseases2. The intrinsic pathway also known as the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway is tightly regulated by members of the Bcl-2 protein family. Together these protein function to modulate the permeability of the mitochondrial outer membrane3.
Based on their operational roles in apoptosis and the number of Bcl-2 homology (BH) domains that they possess, the Bcl-2 family members are divided into three subgroups4. One subgroup includes the proapoptotic members of the family such as Bax and Bak. These proteins mediate the increased mitochondrial outer membrane permeability. A second subgroup are the BH3-only members Bid, Bim, and PUMA, which are the initiators of the apoptosis program. The third subgroup includes the antiapoptotic or pro-survival Bcl-2 family members such as BCL-2, BCL-XL, BCL-W, and MCL1. Each of the pro-survival proteins possess four BCL-2 homology domains (BH1-4), which form a furrow-like structure in the individual proteins. Lacking a cell death signal, the furrow in the pro-survival proteins contacts the pro-apoptotic BH3 proteins, thereby blocking their activation. Moreover, the pro-survival proteins also bind the pro-apoptotic effectors BAX and BAK, which limits their oligomerization. A variety of non-receptor mediated events can trigger the intrinsic apoptosis pathway including growth factor removal, radiation, and certain toxins. The BH3-domain only proteins initiate the apoptosis program by releasing BAX or BAK from the pro-survival BCL-2-like proteins. They also directly bind and activate BAX and/or BAK5,6. The activated BAX and BAK proteins auto-oligomerize forming pore-like structures in the mitochondrial outer membrane causing the release into the cytosol of pro-apoptotic mitochondrial contents. Among them is cytochrome c, which facilitates the oligomerization of APAF-1 (apoptotic peptide activating factor-1). Forming an heptameric structure, APAF-1 recruits and activates caspase-9, thereby forming the apoptosome, which cleaves and activates the effector caspases7.
Using genomic screening techniques, two groups in 2015 reported the identification of GSDMD as a substrate of inflammasome-associated caspase-1, 4 or 5 in humans and caspase-1 and 11 in mice. These caspases cleave GSDMD to generate N-terminal fragments that translocate to cellular membranes, auto-oligomerize, and assemble into membrane pores. This facilitates the secretion of IL-1β and IL-18; and triggers an inflammatory programmed cell death process called pyroptosis8,9. Functionally, pyroptosis is a major mediator of lethal polymicrobial sepsis10. In neutrophils, GSDMD cleavage helps generate neutrophil extracellular traps, a specialized form of neutrophil cell death that releases chromatin and antimicrobial proteins into the extracellular milieu11,12. Active caspase-1 cleaves and triggers caspase-3 and caspase-7 activation through an unclear mechanism, which in turn cleave GSDMD at position D87 in the protein. This inactivates GSDMD pyroptosis in monocytes and macrophages13.
Necroptosis is a form of regulated necrotic cell death that is mediated by the RIP1/RIP3/MLKL signaling axis. Engagement of cell death receptors activates RIP1 and RIP3. The activated RIP kinases form a large protein complex called a necrosome, which phosphorylates MLKL14–16. The phosphorylated MLKL proteins translocate to the plasma membrane, where together with the inositol phosphate (IP) kinases IPMK and ITPK1 they form a highly phosphorylated protein complex, which facilitates the displacement of the MLKL auto-inhibitory brace region. This promotes MLKL auto-oligomerization and membrane pore formation to initiate necroptosis17.
The prominent functional role of Bcl-2 proteins in protecting cells from apoptosis prompted us to assess whether Bcl2 proteins might affect other forms of cell death. Here, we show that GSDMD and MLKL contain a BH3-like domain, which serves as a key structural motif to enable an interaction with Bcl-2. We find that Bcl-2 functions not only as an antiapoptotic protein, but also as an anti-pyroptotic and an anti-necroptotic protein.
Results
GSDMD interacts with Bcl-2
Bcl-2 functions by binding the BH3 domain in target proteins6. To address whether Bcl-2 might have a similar role in the regulation of pyroptosis, we carefully examined the amino acid sequence of pyroptotic executor protein GSDMD for the presence of a BH3-like domain. The consensus sequence for a BH3 domain is Hy-xxx-Hy-K/R-xx-Small-D/E-x-Hy, where Hy is a hydrophobic residue and Small indicates a small amino acid such as glycine18. A highly conserved region in the N-terminal portion of GSDMD conforms to this consensus sequence for a BH3 domain (Fig. 1a). To verify that this region might confer upon GSDMD the ability to interact with Bcl-2, we checked whether the endogenous proteins co-immunoprecipitated using lysates prepared from the human macrophage cell line THP-1. We found that under basal conditions a constitutive interaction between Bcl-2 and GSDMD could be detected (Fig. 1b). To assess whether NLRP3 inflammasome activation and the induction of pyroptosis might affect this interaction, we primed THP-1 cells with LPS and stimulated them with nigericin. Following this treatment, the level of GSDMD in cell lysates remained similar, while that of Bcl-2 declined slightly. However, 2.4-fold more GSDMD associated with Bcl-2 than had under basal conditions (Fig. 1b).
Caspase-1, 4 or 5 cleaves human GSDMD at position 275, forming an N-terminal fragment (NT) and C-terminal fragment (CT) fragment. Consistent with the location of BH3-like domain in NT fragment of GSDMD, the CT fragment of GSDMD did not co-immunoprecipitate with Bcl-2 (Fig. 1c). Three hydrophobic residues in the BH3 domain are critical for binding BH3 domain-containing proteins within the groove of Bcl-2. When we replaced leucine 150 in the BH3-like domain of GSDMD NT with glutamine, it disrupted the interaction with Bcl-2. Furthermore, when we compared Bcl-2 and Bcl-2 G145A, which no longer binds BH3 domain proteins, we found that Bcl-2 G145A did not interact with GSDMD (Fig. 1d) When we replaced GSDMD NT fragment with its full-length version and performed the same assay, we found comparable results (Fig. 1e). To further examine whether GSDMD directly binds Bcl-2, a Bcl-2 recombinant protein was incubated with the immunoprecipitated and washed GSDMD wild type or Bcl-2 target deficient mutant L150Q. We found that Bcl-2 bound GSDMD, and that GSDMD L150Q mutation reduced its interaction with Bcl-2 (Fig. 1f). To confirm that the BH3-like domain of GSDMD alone can bind the Bcl-2 recombinant protein, we used a GST fusion of GSDMD (amino acids 142–159), or its L150Q mutant. As a positive control, we used the BAK BH3 domain (amino acids 70–87). Our data showed that the BH3-like domain of GSDMD pulled down Bcl-2 as efficiently as did the BAK BH3 domain (Fig. 1g). Taken together, the interaction between GSDMD and Bcl-2 depends on a BH3-like domain present in the N-terminal portion of GSDMD.
Bcl-2 inhibits GSDMD cleavage by caspases 1,4, and 5
Next, we expressed caspase-1, 4, or 5 in HEK 293 T to examine the GSDMD cleave pattern generated when we co-expressed Bcl-2 or its G145A mutant. We found that Bcl-2 reduced the GSDMD P30.5 NT cleavage fragment following caspase-1, 4 or 5 expression, but that the Bcl-2 mutant was less able to suppress this cleavage. Interestingly, expression of both the wild type and the mutant Bcl-2 caused the appearance of a P10 NT band (Fig. 2a). To address whether BH3-like domain of GSDMD is critical for Bcl-2 to regulate the caspase mediated GSDMD cleavage, we compared the wild type protein to the GSDMD L150Q protein. Caspase-1, 4, and 5 cleaved the GSDMD L150Q protein to form a P30.5 NT fragment as observed with the wild type GSDMD, however co-expression of Bcl-2 did not have meaningfully impact on the cleavage. The GSDMD L150Q mutation suppressed the appearance of the P10 NT fragment observed following Bcl-2 expression with the wild type GSDMD (Fig. 2b, c). Importantly, the expression of Bcl-2 reduced the amount of cell death detected following expression of caspase-5 and wild type GSDMD (Fig. 2d). To determine whether another pro-survival Bcl-2 protein family member had the same effect, we co-expressed MCL1 with either caspase-1, 4, or 5 in HEK293T cells. In contrast to Bcl-2, MCL1 did not reduce the appearance of the P30.5 NT fragments of GSDMD cleaved by the different caspases. MCL1 expression did induce the appearance of the P10 NT fragment of GSDMD when co-expressed with caspase-1, but we did not detect the P10 NT fragments following caspase-4 or caspase-5 expression (Fig. 2e). To check whether Bcl-2 recombinant protein could impair GSDMD cleavage by caspase-1 in vitro, we used immunoprecipitated GSDMD as a substrate for a recombinant active form of caspase-1. We found that Bcl-2 protein partially reduced the cleavage (Fig. 2f). Next, we assessed whether the addition of the GST-GSDMD BH3-like domain, the L150Q mutation, or GST-BAK BH3 domain would affect the Bcl-2 mediated protection. We co-expressed the various proteins in HEK293T cells. While less effective than the GST-BAK BH3 domain, the GST-GSDMD BH3-like domain partially reversed the Bcl-2 protection and was superior to the L150Q mutant protein (Fig. 2g). These data indicate Bcl-2 targets that GSDMD BH3-like domain to limit caspase cleavage.
Bcl-2 induces cleavage of GSDMD at D87
It has been reported that apoptotic stimulus can induce caspase-3 or -7 mediated cleavage of GSDMD at residue D8713. We had detected a P10 NT GSDMD cleaved band following Bcl-2 co-expression along with the different caspases in HEK-293T cells. As the P10 NT GSDMD fragment is consistent with GSDMD D87 cleavage we sought further evidence to support this possibility. To do so we expressed Flag-GSDMD, Flag-GSDMD D275A, or Flag-GSDMD D87A in HEK 293T cells along with caspase-1, 4 or 5, in the presence or absence of Bcl-2. An antibody raised against amino acids 154–252 of GSDMD was used to detect the 88–484 C-terminal fragment of GSDMD (P42.8 CT). Following expression of caspase-1, 4 or 5, we detected the P42.8 CT cleaved bands in the samples where we had expressed Bcl-2 along with GSDMD or GSDMD D275A but it did not appear with GSDMD D87A. We reblotted the same membrane using Flag antibodies to detect the N-terminal tagged fragment of GSDMD. Again, the P10 NT bands appeared in the GSDMD and GSDMD D275A samples, but not in the GSDMD D87A sample (Fig. 3a–c). To address whether Bcl-2 also inhibits the cleavage of GSDMD at D87 by caspase-3, we performed an in vitro caspase-3 assay with immunoprecipitated GSDMD as a substrate. We found that the added Bcl-2 recombinant protein clearly impaired caspase-3 driven cleavage of GSDMD at D87 (Fig. 3d). These data indicate that the presence of Bcl-2 promoted caspase directed cleavage of GSDMD at D87 rather than at D275 in the cells, but inhibited D87 cleavage by caspase-3 in vitro.
Manipulated expression of Bcl-2 impacts NLRP3 inflammasome activation and GSDMD cleavage
NLRP3 inflammasome activation leads to caspase-1 mediated cleavage of GSDMD at D275. The released N-terminus inserts into plasma membranes forming transmembrane oligomers, which assemble pores that facilitate mature IL-1β secretion19. To address whether Bcl-2 affected NLRP3 inflammasome induced IL-1β production, we used differentiated THP-1 cells and manipulated their Bcl-2 expression levels. Besides IL-1β secretion, we monitored caspase-1 activation and GSDMD cleavage. Following inflammasome activation, an increase in Bcl-2 levels reduced GSDMD cleavage at D275, caspase-1 activation, and IL-1 β secretion, while Bcl-2 G145A did not have these effects (Fig. 4a). Conversely, reducing Bcl2 expression prior to inflammasome activation enhanced GSDMD cleavage at D275, caspase-1 activation, and IL-1β secretion (Fig. 4b). Next, we checked caspase-1 activity following NLRP3 inflammasome reconstitution in HEK293T cells that co-expressed Bcl-2, Bcl-2 G145, or a control. Bcl-2 reduced caspase-1 activation (Fig. 4c). In contrast, when LPS trigged caspase-4 or 5 activation in reconstituted HEK 293T cells Bcl-2 expression did not meaningfully impact caspase-4 or 5 activation (Fig. 4d, e).
Bcl-2 interacts with MLKL
The detection of a functional BH3-like domain in GSDMD prompted us to search for a similar motif in MLKL. We found a reasonable match between amino acid 165 and 176 in human MLKL. It conforms to the consensus BH3 domain sequence except at position 173, where a lysine is present while a smaller amino acid would be favored. We focused on human MLKL as the mouse sequence over the homologous region lacks a basic residue at position 160 (Fig. 5a). The purported BH3 domain in MLKL overlaps with the second brace helix (aa 169–179) in the protein. Together with the first brace helix (aa 129–158), they mediate two functional roles for the protein. First, they transmit conformational information induced by phosphorylation of the MLKL kinase domain to the N-terminal four-helix bundle (4HD) domain, and second, they provide an interface for MLKL oligomerization20,21.
To determine whether the identified potential BH3-like domain in human MLKL can mediate an interaction with Bcl-2, we transfected HEK 293T cells with MLKL and MLKL L176A, a mutation likely to disrupt a MLKL and Bcl-2 interface. We co-transfected Bcl-2 or its BH3 binding deficient mutant Bcl-2 G145A. We found that Bcl-2 co-immunoprecipitated with MLKL, while the MLKL L176A mutation reduced the interaction. The MLKL wild type and its L176A mutant both reduced in the Bcl-2 G145A immunoprecipitations (Fig. 5b). These suggest that the interaction depended upon Bcl-2 recognizing the BH3-like domain in MLKL.
RIP3 phosphorylates the MLKL pseudokinase domain, which switches MLKL from an inert to an activated state16. To test whether the phosphorylation status of MLKL impacted the MLKL/Bcl-2 interaction, we utilized a MLKL phosphorylation site deficient mutant MLKL T357A/S358A and its phosphorylation mimic MLKL T357D/S358E. Constructs expressing each of the proteins were transfected into HEK 293T cells along with RIP3 and Bcl-2. We assessed the interaction between the MLKL proteins and Bcl-2 (Fig. 5c). The results showed that either expressing RIP3 with wild type MLKL or expressing the MLKL phosphorylation mimic enhanced the interaction between MLKL and Bcl-2 (Fig. 5c). In contrast, expression of the phosphorylation site deficient MLKL protein slightly reduced the interaction, even when co-expressed with RIP3 (Fig. 5c). These data suggest that the phosphorylation status of the pseudokinase domain in MLKL can modulate the affinity of the interaction between MLKL and Bcl-2. To examine whether the endogenous MLKL interacts with Bcl-2, THP-1 cells were chosen for immunoprecipitation assays. We found that Bcl-2 consistently interacted with MLKL (Fig. 5d). Moreover, MLKL bound to Bcl-2 recombinant protein, and the BH3-like domain mutant L176A of MLKL exhibited less binding (Fig. 5e). To prove BH3-like domain of MLKL alone could bind with Bcl-2 recombinant protein, we expressed and purified GST fusions of BH3-like domain of MLKL, its mutant L176A, and the BAK BH3 domain. The protein binding assays showed that the GST-MLKL BH3-like domain bound Bcl-2, and the L176A mutation reduced its interaction with Bcl-2 (Fig. 5f). Taken together, our data indicate that the MLKL BH3-like domain can bind Bcl-2.
Bcl-2 reduces phosphorylation of MLKL and decreases the formation of MLKL oligomers
The above results encouraged us to check the impact of Bcl-2 on MLKL functionality. First, we expressed RIP3 to drive MLKL phosphorylation and oligomerization in HEK 293T cells, which lack endogenous RIP3. We co-transfected either Bcl-2 or Bcl-2 G145A. The cell lysates were separated into membrane and cytosol enriched fractions to check the status of MLKL phosphorylation and oligomerization. We found that the wild type Bcl-2, not only reduced MLKL phosphorylation, but also its oligomerization. In contrast, Bcl-2 G145A had little impact (Fig. 6a). Second, an in vitro kinase assay using RIP3 and MLKL showed that the addition of a Bcl-2 recombinant protein reduced MLKL phosphorylation (Fig. 6b). Third, the purified GST-MLKL BH3-like domain reversed the Bcl-2 mediated interference of RIP3 mediated MILK phosphorylation. Furthermore, the GST-MLKL BH3-like domain mutant L176A had less effect (Fig. 6c). Fourth, in HEK 293T cells Bcl-2 reduced MLKL phosphorylation by RIP3, and the MLKL L176A mutation reduced the efficacy of Bcl-2 (Fig. 6d). Taken together, our results indicate that BH3-like domain of MLKL facilitates Bcl-2 mediated inhibition of MLKL phosphorylation by Rip3. Furthermore, we made use of HT-29 cells, a human colon adenocarcinoma cell line. Treating these cells with a combination of TNF-α, molecules that sensitize TNF-α activity such as second mitochondria-derived activator of caspases (Smac) mimetics, and a pan caspase inhibitor causes them to undergo necroptosis. This combination is often referred to as TSZ. We also favored HT-29 cells because they have low endogenous Bcl-2 expression. Therefore, we stably expressed Bcl-2 or Bcl-2 G145A in HT-29 cells and used these permanent cell lines to test whether Bcl-2 affects MLKL mediated necroptosis. Like the previous experiment using HEK 293T cells, Bcl-2, but not Bcl-2G145A reduced MLKL phosphorylation and oligomerization when induced with TSZ (Fig. 7a). The cellular viability assay showed that Bcl-2, but not Bcl-2 G145A reduced TSZ driven necroptosis (Fig. 7b).
The above studies indicated that the presence of Bcl-2 reduced MLKL phosphorylation and MLKL oligomerization. To try and tease out whether Bcl-2 directly impacted MLKL oligomerization, we co-transfected constructs expressing Bcl-2 or Bcl-2 G145A with MLKL T357D/S358E phosphorylated mimic protein into HEK 293 T cells. The MLKL mutations lessened its translocation to cellular membrane. Consequently, the majority of the oligomerized MLKL remained in the cytosol fraction. We found that Bcl-2, but not Bcl-2 G145A decreased the MLKL oligomerization by approximately 30% suggesting that Bcl-2 directly interferes with MLKL oligomerization (Fig. 7c). Finally, we tested whether the Bcl-2 family member MCL1 could play the same as role Bcl-2. We compared the effect of Bcl-2 to that of MCL1 on MLKL phosphorylation in HEK 293T cells transiently expressing RIP3 and MLKL. As previously Bcl-2 reduced the amount of phosphorylated MLKL (approximately 70%), however, MCL1 had little effect suggesting that MCL1 does not impact RIP3 driven necroptosis. We also checked whether Bcl-2 or MCL1 affected the autophosphorylation of RIP3 by immunoblotting for pRIP3. However, neither Bcl-2 or MCL1 had an appreciable effect (Fig. 7d). This suggests that Bcl-2 does impact MLKL phosphorylation by directly interfering with RIP3 kinase to target its substrate MLKL.
Discussion
Necroptosis and pyroptosis depend upon oligomerized proteins inserting into cell membranes to form pores and cause cell death22. In this study, we found that Bcl-2 interacted with the pyroptosis and necroptosis effector proteins that oligomerize and insert into the plasma membrane, GSDMD and MLKL, respectively. The interaction of Bcl-2 with GSDMD and MLKL depended upon sequence motifs in them that resemble the consensus sequence for the BH3 domains present in Bcl-2 family members. Following necroptotic signals Bcl-2 reduced MLKL phosphorylation, sharply decreased its tendency to oligomerize, and reduced cell death.
Our results indicate that the binding of Bcl-2 to GSDMD alters the caspase 1, 4, and 5 mediated cleavage from residue D274 to D87, thereby resulting in the generation of less active GSDMD (fragment amino acids 1–275). We never detected the 88–257 amino acid fragment suggesting that Bcl-2 redirects the caspase from D274 to D87, rather than permitting cleavage at both sites.
Interestingly, in mouse models of sepsis the transgenic expression of Bcl-2 in a variety of cell types reduces cell death and improves survival23. Arguing that Bcl-2 may not only target apoptosis, but also pyroptosis, GSDMD is a likely contributor to the pathogenesis of sepsis24. Furthermore, a recently developed chemical inhibitor of gasdermin D, Necrosulfonamide improves survival following sepsis in mice arguing that gasdermin D inhibitors may be efficacious in treating certain inflammatory diseases25. Based on our study, enhancing Bcl-2 activity, which would limit GSDMD activation could also prove beneficial.
Bcl-2 has been reported to negatively affect NLRP3 inflammasome activity in macrophages26. Our data indicate that Bcl-2 directly inhibits caspase 1 mediated cleavage of GSDMD at D274, which will reduce the incidence of pyroptosis and lessens IL-1β release. Bcl-2 and Bcl-XL also suppress NLRP1 inflammasome activation by reducing the binding of ATP to NLRP1, suppressing NLRP1 oligomerization, and thereby reducing NLRP1-mediated caspase-1 activation. When exposed to a NLRP1 activator, Bcl-2-deficient macrophages exhibit more caspase-1 processing and IL-1β production, whereas Bcl-2-overexpressing macrophages have the opposite phenotype27,28. Since NLRP1 inflammasomes can also trigger pyroptosis, Bcl-2 may also directly suppress pyroptosis by and IL-1β secretion by directly altering the cleavage of GSDMD.
It has been reported that MLKL adopts a monomeric conformation in human cells prior to exposure to a necroptotic stimulus29. Based on our data, Bcl-2 may interact with monomeric MLKL, and with the monomeric MLKL/Rip3 complex. The presence of a BH3-like domain in MLKL that overlies the second brace region argues that the Bcl-2/MLKL interaction has a physiologic role. In the present study, Bcl-2 interactions with this region in MLKL disrupted the phosphorylation and oligomerization of the protein. Furthermore, mutation of the fourth hydrophobic residue in the human MLKL BH3-like domain (L176A) disrupted the interaction of Bcl-2 with MLKL. A mutation in mouse MLKL also in the fourth hydrophobic residue of the BH3-like domain (L166A) along with an adjacent mutation (T165A) caused defective MLKL oligomerization and interfered with the execution of necroptosis20.
That Bcl-2 binds to a BH3-like domain in a non-Bcl2 family member to affect function of that protein is not unprecedented. Bcl-2 binds to a BH3- like domain in Beclin-1, which acts as a brake on the initialization of autophagy30. Mice carrying a Beclin-1 F121A mutation, which disrupts the Belcin-1/BCL-2 autophagy regulatory complex, have increased autophagy, a prolonged duration of good health, and enhanced longevity31. Our investigation provides two other examples of Bcl-2 acting on non-Bcl-2 family to regulate protein function.
Materials and methods
Reagents and antibodies
Antibodies used for immunoblotting analysis were the following: anti-IL-1β (#12703), anti-caspase-1 (#3866), anti-caspase-4 (#4450), anti-caspase-5 (#46680), anti-MLKL (#14993), anti-phospho-MLKL (#91689), anti-RIP-3 (#13526), anti-phospho-RIP3 (#93654) and anti-Myc-tag (#2278) (Cell Signaling Technology); and anti-Flag (Sigma-Aldrich, F1804), anti-Bcl-2 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-783), anti-actin conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Sigma-Aldrich, A3854), anti-GAPDH conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Proteintech, HRP-60004), goat anti-rabbit HRP-linked antibody (#7074), and horse anti-mouse HRP-linked antibody (#7076) (Cell Signaling Technology). Anti-GSDMD was from (Novusbio, NBP2-33422). The LPS, nigericin and Z-VAD-FMK caspase inhibitor were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. SYTOX Green nucleic acid stain was purchased from Invitrogen. Smac mimetic was from Tocris. Caspase-1, caspase-3 and Bcl-2 recombinant proteins were from EMD Millipore. Human TNFα was from R&D System. Smac mimic was from APExBIO.
Cells, plasmids, and siRNAs
THP-1 cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection. THP-1 and HT-29 cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 Medium supplemented with 10% FBS (Invitrogen), and HEK 293 T cells were maintained in DMEM Medium with 10% FBS. To differentiate THP-1 cells into macrophages the cells were treated with 25 ng/ml of PMA (Sigma-Aldrich) for 3 h. Subsequently, the cells were washed with Opti-MEM medium (Life Technologies) and re-seeded into 12 well plates in 0.5 ml of Opi-MEM media. The Flag tagged GSDMD full length, its NT, CT, and D275A mutant plasmids; and Myc-caspase-1, Myc-caspase-4, Myc-caspase-5 and Myc-caspase-11 were a kind gift from Dr. Feng Shao (National Institute of Biological Sciences, Beijing, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Beijing China). Flag-MLKL and Myc-RIP3 plasmids were a gift from Dr. Zheng-Gang Liu (National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health). GST fusion BAK BH3 (70–87 aa), GST fusion GSDMD BH3-like (142–159 aa), its mutant L150Q, GST fusion MLKL BH3-like (161–178 aa) were made by ligating the respectively synthesized DNA with a GST expression vector. Bcl-2 and scrambled control siRNAs were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. The plasmids or the siRNAs were transiently transfected into the cells using X-tremeGENE-HP (Roche) following the manufacture’s protocol.
Stable expression of Bcl-2 and its mutant in HT-29 cells
Bcl-2 plasmids were transfected into HT-29 cells. 24 h later G418 (400 µg/ml) was added to the cell culture for 2 weeks. Dead cells were removed when the media was changed. Single clones were picked and expanded for evaluation. Bcl-2 expression was tested by immunoblotting and positive cell lines were expanded for cell freezing and experiments.
Immunoblot analysis and immunoprecipitations
For standard immunoblotting, the cells were lysed using a buffer of 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 50 mM β-glycerophosphate, 1 mM Na3VO4, 0.5% (vol/vol) Triton X-100, 0.5% (vol/vol) CHAPS (3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)-dimethylammonio]-1-propane sulfonate hydrate) and 10% (vol/vol) glycerol with a protease inhibitor ‘cocktail' tablet (Roche). The lysates were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose membrane by iBLOT Gel Transfer System (Invitrogen). The membrane was incubated with 5% nonfat milk w/v in TBS buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5; 150 mM NaCl; 0.1% Tween-20) for 1 h, and then reacted with the primary antibody in TBS buffer with 2.5% nonfat milk or 5% BSA w/v overnight by shaking at 4 °C. The appropriate second antibodies conjugated to HRP were used to detect the protein of interest via enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL). To immunoprecipitate endogenous or tagged proteins, the cells were lysed in the above buffer and incubated for 2 h at 4 °C with the antibody conjugated beads or primary antibodies followed by protein G beads for another 1 h. The captured immunoprecipitates were washed eight times with lysis buffer, then separated by SDS-PAGE, and analyzed by immunoblotting. The results were quantitated using ImageJ.
Phase separation fractionation
The fractionation was performed as previously described16. Briefly, cell pellets were re‐suspended in 5× volume of Triton X-114 lysis buffer (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 2% Triton X-114, and complete protease inhibitor [Roche]) and incubated on ice for 30 min. The cell lysate was centrifuged at 15,000 × g at 4 °C for 10 min, and then the supernatant was harvested as the detergent soluble fraction. After warming at 30 °C for 3 min, the detergent soluble fraction was centrifuged at 1500 × g for 5 min at room temperature. The aqueous layer was collected then re‐centrifuged at 1500 × g for 5 min to remove any contamination from the detergent enriched layer and saved as the aqueous faction. The detergent enriched layer was diluted with 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl to the same volume as the detergent soluble fraction and re‐centrifuged at 1500 × g for 5 min. The washed, detergent enriched layer was diluted with the same buffer to the identical volume as the aqueous faction and saved as the detergent fraction.
In vitro protein binding, protein kinase, and caspase assay
For in vitro protein binding assay, the immunoprecipitated GSDMD, MLKL or GST-BH3-like domains were washed 4 times with lysis buffer, then incubated with added Bcl-2 recombinant protein, or BSA as a control protein. The samples were washed again with lysis buffer prior to SDS-PAGE gel and immunoblotting. For in vitro kinase assays, cell lysate from HEK 293 T expressing RIP3 were added to the immunoprecipitated and purified MLKL using a kinase reaction buffer (25 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, β-glycerol phosphate 12.5 mM, MgCl2 10 mM, fresh ATP 100 µM and DTT 5 mM). The sample was incubated at room temperature with gently shaking for 30 min. SDS loading buffer was added to stop the reaction prior to fractionation on SDS-PAGE gel. Similarly, in vitro caspase activation assays were performed by mixing the active caspase, Bcl-2 recombinant protein, along with immunoprecipitated and purified protein together in caspase reaction buffer (50 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, NaCl 50 mM, 0.1% CHAPS, 1 mM EDTA, 5% glycerol, fresh 10 mM DTT), for a 30 min incubation at room temperature. SDS loading buffer was added to stop the reaction prior to fractionation on SDS-PAGE gel.
Cell viability assay
To detect cell death triggered by cleaved GSDMD, we used trypan blue uptake and light microscopy. Twenty-four hours following transfection, trypan blue stained cells were evaluated using bright light microscopy. Blue stained cells with ruptured plasma membranes were distinguished from non-stained live cells with intact plasma membrane. The dead cells were calculated as a percentage of the total number of cells32. SYTOX green was used to evaluate cellular necroptosis induced by TNF-α 20 ng/ml, 100 nM Smac mimetic and 20 µM z-VAD-FMK following the manufacturer’s protocol.
Inflammasome activation assay
To assess NLRP3 inflammasome activation THP-1 cells were treated with PMA 25 ng/ml for 3 h and the cells washed once with Opi-MEM medium (Life Technologies). The cells were reseeded with 0.5 ml Opi-MEM medium in 12 well plate. LPS (50 ng/ml) was used to prime the cells overnight, and nigericin (15 µM) was added for 45 min, then the cell supernatants were collected. Bcl-2 or its siRNA were transfected into PMA treated THP-1 cells overnight. Following the culture period, the supernatants were transferred to a microcentrifuge tube and 0.5 ml of methanol and 0.125 ml chloroform added. After mixing and a 5-min centrifugation at 13,000 RPM, the upper phase was discarded being careful not to disturb the interface. 0.5 ml methanol was added the samples spun again for 5 min at 13,000 rpm. The supernatants were discarded, and the pelleted proteins air dried for 5 min at 50 °C. After which 60 µl of 1× sample loading buffer with DTT (final concentration of 0.1 µM) was added to each sample prior to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting to detect IL-1β and caspase-1 p20.
Statistics
All experiments were repeated a minimum of three times unless otherwise indicated. Statistical significance is based on the analysis of at least triplicate samples. Standard errors of the mean (SEM) and p-values were calculated using t-test in GraphPad Prism (GraphPad software).
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Feng Shao and Dr. Zheng-Gang Liu for providing reagents. We thank Dr. Anthony Fauci for his longstanding support. This research was supported by the intramural program of NIAID.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Footnotes
Edited by M.V. Niklison Chirou
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Henson PM, Hume DA. Apoptotic cell removal in development and tissue homeostasis. Trends Immunol. 2006;27:244–250. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2006.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Favaloro B, Allocati N, Graziano V, Di Ilio C, De Laurenzi V. Role of apoptosis in disease. Aging (Albany NY) 2012;4:330–349. doi: 10.18632/aging.100459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Elmore S. Apoptosis: a review of programmed cell death. Toxicol. Pathol. 2007;35:495–516. doi: 10.1080/01926230701320337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chipuk JE, Moldoveanu T, Llambi F, Parsons MJ, Green DR. The BCL-2 family reunion. Mol. Cell. 2010;37:299–310. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.01.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Delbridge AR, Strasser A. The BCL-2 protein family, BH3-mimetics and cancer therapy. Cell Death Differ. 2015;22:1071–1080. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2015.50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Czabotar PE, Lessene G, Strasser A, Adams JM. Control of apoptosis by the BCL-2 protein family: implications for physiology and therapy. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2014;15:49–63. doi: 10.1038/nrm3722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Jiang X, Wang X. Cytochrome C-mediated apoptosis. Annu Rev. Biochem. 2004;73:87–106. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.011303.073706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kayagaki N, et al. Caspase-11 cleaves gasdermin D for non-canonical inflammasome signalling. Nature. 2015;526:666–671. doi: 10.1038/nature15541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Shi J, et al. Cleavage of GSDMD by inflammatory caspases determines pyroptotic cell death. Nature. 2015;526:660–665. doi: 10.1038/nature15514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kang R, et al. Lipid peroxidation drives gasdermin D-mediated pyroptosis in lethal polymicrobial sepsis. Cell Host Microbe. 2018;24:97–108 e104. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2018.05.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chen KW, et al. Noncanonical inflammasome signaling elicits gasdermin D–dependent neutrophil extracellular traps. Sci. Immunol. 2018;3:eaar6676. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.aar6676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sollberger G, et al. Gasdermin D plays a vital role in the generation of neutrophil extracellular traps. Sci. Immunol. 2018;3:eaar6689. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.aar6689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Taabazuing CY, Okondo MC, Bachovchin DA. Pyroptosis and apoptosis pathways engage in bidirectional crosstalk in monocytes and macrophages. Cell Chem. Biol. 2017;24:507–514 e504. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2017.03.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zhao J, et al. Mixed lineage kinase domain-like is a key receptor interacting protein 3 downstream component of TNF-induced necrosis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2012;109:5322–5327. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1200012109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sun L, et al. Mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein mediates necrosis signaling downstream of RIP3 kinase. Cell. 2012;148:213–227. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wang H, et al. Mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein MLKL causes necrotic membrane disruption upon phosphorylation by RIP3. Mol. Cell. 2014;54:133–146. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Dovey CM, et al. MLKL requires the inositol phosphate code to execute necroptosis. Mol. Cell. 2018;70:936–948 e937. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.05.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sinha S, Levine B. The autophagy effector Beclin 1: a novel BH3-only protein. Oncogene. 2008;27(Suppl 1):S137–S148. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.He WT, et al. Gasdermin D is an executor of pyroptosis and required for interleukin-1beta secretion. Cell Res. 2015;25:1285–1298. doi: 10.1038/cr.2015.139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Davies KA, et al. The brace helices of MLKL mediate interdomain communication and oligomerisation to regulate cell death by necroptosis. Cell Death Differ. 2018;25:1567–1580. doi: 10.1038/s41418-018-0061-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Petrie EJ, Hildebrand JM, Murphy JM. Insane in the membrane: a structural perspective of MLKL function in necroptosis. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2017;95:152–159. doi: 10.1038/icb.2016.125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zhang Y, Chen X, Gueydan C, Han J. Plasma membrane changes during programmed cell deaths. Cell Res. 2018;28:9–21. doi: 10.1038/cr.2017.133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hotchkiss RS, et al. Overexpression of Bcl-2 in transgenic mice decreases apoptosis and improves survival in sepsis. J. Immunol. 1999;162:4148–4156. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Liu X, Lieberman J. How ICE lights the pyroptosis fire. Cell Death Differ. 2017;24:197–199. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2016.157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Rathkey JK, et al. Chemical disruption of the pyroptotic pore-forming protein gasdermin D inhibits inflammatory cell death and sepsis. Sci. Immunol. 2018;3:eaat2738. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.aat2738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Shimada K, et al. Oxidized mitochondrial DNA activates the NLRP3 inflammasome during apoptosis. Immunity. 2012;36:401–414. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.01.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bruey JM, et al. Bcl-2 and Bcl-XL regulate proinflammatory caspase-1 activation by interaction with NALP1. Cell. 2007;129:45–56. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.01.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Faustin B, et al. Mechanism of Bcl-2 and Bcl-X(L) inhibition of NLRP1 inflammasome: loop domain-dependent suppression of ATP binding and oligomerization. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106:3935–3940. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0809414106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Petrie EJ, et al. Conformational switching of the pseudokinase domain promotes human MLKL tetramerization and cell death by necroptosis. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:2422. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04714-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Pattingre S, et al. Bcl-2 antiapoptotic proteins inhibit Beclin 1-dependent autophagy. Cell. 2005;122:927–939. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Fernandez AF, et al. Disruption of the beclin 1-BCL2 autophagy regulatory complex promotes longevity in mice. Nature. 2018;558:136–140. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0162-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Crowley LC, Marfell BJ, Christensen ME, Waterhouse NJ. Measuring cell death by trypan blue uptake and light microscopy. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2016;2016:1064–1072. doi: 10.1101/pdb.prot087155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]