Andrzej Grzybowski, Ronald A Schachar, Magdalena Gaca-Wysocka, Ira H Schachar, Barbara K. Pierscionek
(Int J Ophthalmol 2019;12(11):1751-1757, DOI:10.18240/ijo.2019.11.14)
The authors wish to revise the follow contents:
Page 1753, 2nd Column: 1st Paragraph, 1st Sentence: The precision of the measurements fell between the time base resolution of the UBM, which was 5 mm [This should be 5 µm], and the pixel size of the image, which was 11.5 mm [This should be 11.5 µm].
Page 1753, 2nd Column, 4th Paragraph, 2nd Sentence: Only 8 of 25 subjects satisfied the inclusion criteria of registerable foveal images, central corneal shifts ≤100 mm [This should be 100 µm] and >7 diopters of change in accommodative amplitude post-pilocarpine.
Page 1754, Table 1: △ELR (mm) [This should be △ELR (µm)].
Page 1754, Table 2: △CLT (mm) [This should be △CLT (µm)].
Page 1755, Figure 3, Legend: The predicted change in ELR was obtained by multiplying accommodative amplitude, AAELR given in Table 1, by the change/diopter in CLT, 6.75 mm/diopter [This should be 6.75 µm/diopter].
The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused by these errors.
