Abstract
Mast cells constitutively express ß-catenin and expand in solid tumors such as colon and skin cancer. However, the role of ß-catenin signaling in mast cells and the cause or effect of mast cell expansion and tumor growth has yet to be established. In earlier studies we used mast cell depletion and protease staining approaches, to provide evidence for a causative role of mast cells in small bowel polyposis, and related specific phenotypes and distributions of tumor infiltrating mast cells to stages of tumor growth. Here we report that, stabilization of ß-catenin expands mast cells to promote high incidence of colon polyposis and infrequent small bowel polyps and skin cancer. Expression of a dominant acting ß-catenin in mast cells (5CreCAT) stimulated maturation and expression of granule stored proteases. Both mucosal and connective tissue type mast cells accumulated in colonic small bowel polyps independent of gender, and mice developed chronic systemic inflammation with splenomegaly. Reconstitution of polyposis-prone mice with bone marrow from 5CreCAT mice resulted in focal expansion of connective tissue like mast cells, which are normally rare in benign polyps and characteristically expand during adenoma-to-carcinoma transition. Our findings highlight a hitherto unknown contribution of ß-catenin signaling in mast cells to their maturation and to increased risk of colon cancer.
Keywords: mast cells, ß-catenin, bone marrow, proteases, inflammation, cancer
Introduction
Two distinct populations of mast cells (MCs) have been described, the connective tissue mast cells (CTMCs) that are often embryonic-derived and serve as innate tissue sentinels, and the bone marrow-derived mucosal mast cells (MMCs) that are induced in response to parasitic invasion or tissue damage (1). CTMCs are independent of T-cells while MMCs are recruited into the gut as progenitors and mature in a T-cell dependent manner (2–4). In addition to their role in parasitic infections and allergic reactions, MC infiltration of tumors has been documented in mouse models of cancer and in human colon cancer (5, 6). However, the role of MCs in tumor growth is unclear (7). This could be related to MC plasticity and to the multitude of functions attributed to them. Indeed, there is evidence that MCs can both promote and reject tumors, and it has been suggested that MCs function as a rheostatic to regulate tumor immunity (8–10). Some striking examples of the protective function of MCs in cancer include a recent study where the genetic ablation of ACKR2, a decoy chemokine receptor, in the Min-APC mouse model of polyposis increased recruitment of MCs and led to tumor rejection in a MC and CD8 dependent manner (11). MCs were also reported to reject tumors in mouse models of metastatic colon cancer, in a TH9-dependent manner (12). Signals that activate MC maturation in the intestine independently of invading pathogens are poorly understood. Our findings demonstrated that initiation and progression of solid tumors are one such example. In earlier studies we used mouse models of spontaneous polyposis and intestinal cancer to identify distinct populations of tumor infiltrating MCs, which phenotypically resembled MMCs and CTMCs. MMCs expanded inside tumors during tumor initiation and CTMCs during tumor progression (5, 13). We also used MC depletion and MC protease knock-out experiments to demonstrate the role of MMCs in polyposis and of CTMCs in tumor growth, and additionally provided evidence for differential cytokine requirements of these two types of MCs (5, 13–15). What makes MCs reject tumors or promote tumor growth remain unknown.
MCs share many characteristics with stem cells including expression of the stem cell factor receptor c-Kit and ß-catenin. In vitro studies using cultured MCs demonstrated that activation of c-Kit feeds to the downstream canonical Wnt/ß-catenin signaling pathway (16, 17), and mediates MC maturation (18). Wnt proteins are abundantly expressed and secreted by colon tumor cells (19), and potentially could activate ß-catenin signaling in tumor infiltrating MCs. To better understand how ß-catenin signaling in MCs alters their properties, we expressed Catnblox(ex3) (20) a conditional dominant-stable ß-catenin in C57BL6/J mice. This was achieved by using Mcpt5-Cre (21), a MC specific Cre, to excise phosphorylation sites in exon-3 of the endogenous ß-catenin gene, thus preventing ubiquitination and degradation of ß-catenin. Nearly all the resulting Mcpt5-Cre Catnblox(ex3) mice (abbreviated as 5CreCAT) developed colonic polyps, independent of gender. Infrequent skin tumors and small bowel adenomatous polyps were also observed. Colonic polyposis coincided with notable intrapolyp expansion of both MMC and CTMC type MCs along with type-2 innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) and T-helper-2 T-cells in the colon and with systemic inflammation. Introduction of 5CreCAT bone marrow into irradiated, polyposis-prone APCΔ468 mice caused focal expansion of CTMC like MCs in the lesions and increased tumor load. These findings mechanistically link the action of ß-catenin in MCs to their gain of tumor promoting properties.
Materials and Methods
Primary Mast Cell Cultures
Femurs and tibia from 5Cre or 5CreCAT mice were flushed with PBS using 27-gauge needles and were dispersed by pipetting up and down. Cells were filtered through 40 μM strainers into 15 ml tubes. Cells were then centrifuged at 1,400 rpm for 10 min at 4°C, then resuspended and washed. Erythrocytes were lysed in ACK lysis buffer (Lonza) for 1 min. Lysis reaction was stopped with 2% BSA containing PBS and cells were then washed. Cells were resuspended in RPMI 1640 complete media (Lonza). RPMI 1640 media supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Millipore), L-glutamine (2 mM), non-essential amino acids (0.1 mM), penicillin/streptomycin (100 U/ml), interleukin-3 (5-ng/ml), ß-Mercaptoethanol 7 ul, (Invitrogen), stem cell factor (12.5 ng/ml) (Gibco), and transferred into a 25-cm2 flask. On the next day, cells were split into three new 25-cm2 flasks filled with 5 ml of growth medium. A fresh 5 ml of medium was added every 48 h until the volume reached 15 ml. The cells were then centrifuged at 200 rcf and resuspended into 5 ml of growth medium, repeating the cycle. After 3 weeks of culture, cells were checked for maturity by microscopic morphology, cytospin staining for mast cell specific proteases, and by flow cytometry for the expression of ß-catenin, FcεR1, and c-Kit.
β-Hexosaminidase Release (Mast Cell Degranulation) Assay
Mouse anti-DNP immunoglobulin E (IgE) at 1 μg/ml concentration was added overnight to primary bone marrow derived MC. On the next day, cells were washed (centrifugation at 1,000 rpm) with Tyrode's buffer, and subsequently challenged with DNP-BSA (Sigma) at 100 ng/ml for 30 min. The supernatant was collected and stored at 4°C and the pellet was lyzed with 0.1% Triton X. The 20 μl of supernatant or pellet lysate were incubated with 1 mM 4-nitrophenyl N-acetyl-β-d-glucosaminide (PNAG) for 60 min at 37°C and the reaction was stopped with 200 μl carbonate buffer (0.1 M, pH 10). β-hexosaminidase release in the supernatant was measured at 405 nm absorbance and interpreted as the percentage of total cellular (lysate + supernatant) β-hexosaminidase.
Immunofluorescence and Immunohistochemistry
For tissue pathology assessment, both small bowel and large bowel were affixed in Swiss-roll fashion, fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin for overnight, and paraffin embedded and processed. For hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), immunofluorescence, and immunohistochemistry staining, 5 μm thick sections were dewaxed and then hydrated using xylene and alcohol/water. For immunofluorescence and immunohistochemistry, antigen retrieval was performed using Antigen Deloaker (Biocare medical) and Target Retrieval Solution (Dako). Following retrieval, tissues were washed with PBS and blocked using Background Sniper (Biocare medical), and Avidin/Biotin blocking kit (Vector Laboratories). Primary antibodies were prepared in Dako Antibody Diluent (Dako) and incubated overnight at 4°C. Slides were washed with Dako Wash buffer for 5 min 3 times. Secondary biotinylated antibodies (Vector laboratories) were then added and incubated for 45 min, and then Avidin-biotin complex with conjugated alkaline phosphate (Vector laboratories) was for 45 min. SIGMAFAST™ Fast Red TR/Naphthol (Sigma) was used for the color reaction. Slides were mounted with CC-mount (Sigma). GATA3 staining methods were adapted from Mackley et al. (22).
Cytospin Tryptase Immunocytochemistry
MCs were cytospun on to slides at 500 rpm. The slides were dried for 5 min and then fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde for 10 min. Endogenous avidin and biotin were blocked using Avidin-biotin blocking kit (Vector Labs) and non-specific Fc-receptor binding was blocked by anti-mouse CD16/CD32 (clone 2.4G2). Staining steps were then completed as mention above.
Antibodies
Mast cell protease antibodies (Rabbit anti-mouse mMCP-2, dilution: 1/200; Sheep anti-mMCP2, dilution: 1/200; Rabbit anti-mouse mMCP5, dilution: 1/100; Rabbit anti-mouse mMCP6, dilution: 1/500) were a gift from Dr. Michael Gurish. Antibodies to ß-catenin (clone 14, dilution: 1/200,) was purchased from BD Biosciences. CD3ε (clone eBio500A2, dilution: 1/100), and GATA3 (clone TWAJ, dilution: 1/50), were purchased from ebiosciences-Thermo. Alexafluor conjugated (anti-rat, anti-rabbit, anti-sheep, dilution: 1/200) were obtained from Invitrogen-Thermo. For flow cytometry antibodies, anti-CD11b (clone M1/70, dilution: 1/700), anti-CD11c (clone N418, dilution: 1/100), anti-Ly6C (clone HK1.4, dilution: 1/300), anti-Ly6G (clone 1A8, dilution: 1/300), anti-CD117 (clone 2B8, dilution: 1/200), and antiFcεR1 (clone MAR-1, dilution: 1/100) antibodies were purchased from Biolegend. Anti-RORγt (clone Q31-378, dilution: 1/100) was purchased from BD. Anti-Foxp3 (clone FJK-16s, dilution: 1/100) was purchased from ebiosciences-Thermo.
Flow Cytometry
Cells were harvested from tissues of interest (spleens and MLN). 2 × 106 cells per 100 μl staining volume were transferred to a 96-well, round-bottomed plate (Corning). After centrifugation for 5 min at 4°C at 200 rcf, cells were then incubated for 20 min on ice with Fc-block (clone 2.4G2) added and washed with PBS. Cells were then incubated with surface antibodies and LIVE/DEAD Fixable Blue stain (Molecular Probes) for 30 min in the dark on ice, and washed twice with PBS. Stained cells were then fixed using 2% PFA for 10 min in the dark on ice, and then washed once with PBS. For intracellular staining, cells were fixed and permeabilized using Foxp3/Transcription Factor Staining Buffer kit (eBioscience). Antibodies for intracellular staining were diluted in 100 μl 1X wash/perm buffer and cells were incubated in 100 μl of the staining solution for 2 h on ice or overnight at 4°C. Cells were then centrifuged and washed twice using the wash/perm buffer, and transferred to tubes for acquisition.
Flow Cytometry Acquisition and Analysis
Cells were suspended at 2 × 106 cells per 250-μl volume, and samples were run on a BD LSRII flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and Accuri BD flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). Data were analyzed using FlowJo software (TreeStar).
Microscopy
A Leica light microscope mounted with a Zeiss Axiocam 503 camera was used for imaging immunohistochemistry staining. For imaging fluorescent staining, a Zeiss Observer Z1 microscope mounted with an Axiocam 506 mono camera was used. Fiji software was used for image analysis.
Bone Marrow Reconstitution Experiments
At 2 months of age, mice were irradiated with Cesium-137 (Cs) 1,100-rads dose (split over 2 days; 550 rads/day). Four hours following the irradiation, 2–4 × 106 washed, RBCs lysed bone marrow cells obtained from control 5Cre or 5CreCAT mice were injected into the retro-orbital sinus. Mice were kept on antibiotics supplied in drinking water for 2 months.
Statistical Analysis
All results are presented as the mean with SD. Significance between two groups was assessed by the Student's two-tailed t-test. P-value that was less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant for all data sets. All statistical analysis was performed with the use of Prism 8 software (GraphPad).
Ethical Statement
Experiments with mice were approved by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee protocol number A00004708-19 and A733113, Mayo Clinic.
Results
To understand how ß-catenin shapes MC properties, we crossed Mcpt5-Cre mice (21) to Catnblox(ex3) mice, which express a conditional dominant ß-catenin (20). In the Mcpt5-Cre transgenic mice, the Cre recombinase is expressed specifically in MCs under the control of the promoter of mMCP5, a CTMC-specific protease (21, 23). We crossed the Mcpt5-Cre mice with Catnblox(ex3) mice to excise exon 3 of ß-catenin in MCs. Our earlier studies had shown that stabilization of ß-catenin has pro-inflammatory, cytotoxic, and oncogenic outcomes in T-cells. For example, CD4Cre Catnblox(ex3) mice that stabilized ß-catenin in T-cells had reduced numbers of mature T-cells and developed systemic inflammation and colitis, or T-cell leukemia (24, 25). To ascertain stabilization of ß-catenin in MCs, and their viability and functionality, we expanded MCs ex vivo from bone marrows of control Mcpt5-Cre mice (abbreviated to 5Cre) and Mcpt5-Cre Catnblox(ex3) mice (abbreviated to 5CreCAT) in medium containing SCF and IL-3. Matured MCs were identified by their morphology and by staining for mMCP6 containing storage granules. Immunofluorescence staining of cytospun cells detected co-expression mMCP6 and nuclear ß-catenin in less than half of the 5CreCAT cells, and positive mMCP6 staining but no ß-catenin in the control 5CreCat cultures (Figure 1A compare to Figure 1B, quantification in Figure 1C). FACS analysis detected expression of ß-catenin in both cultures, but a notable increase in 5CreCAT compared to 5Cre cells (Figure 1D compare to Figure 1E). To test for expression of the exon-3 deleted Catnblox(ex3) transgene (20), we performed Western blot analysis of cell extracts prepared from heterozygous 5CreCAT MCs, using antibody to ß-catenin. Control 5Cre MCs expressed a ~94 kD band corresponding to the native unmutated ß-catenin, while 5CreCAT MCs expressed an additional shorter prominent band corresponding to exon-3 deleted ß-catenin (Figure 1F). The matured 5CreCAT MCs expressed bona fide MC lineage markers c-Kit and FcεRI, and distributed into 3 putative stages of MC maturation described earlier (26) (Supplementary Figures 1A,B). Earlier reports have suggested that ß-catenin positively regulates the expression of granule stored proteases in MCs (18). Cross linking of cell surface IgE receptors triggered degranulation by both types of MC, but less efficiently by 5CreCAT than control 5Cre MCs. This could suggest either a delay in maturation or a partial loss of function of 5CreCAT relative to 5Cre MCs (Figure 1G).
Activated MCs can mediate colitis (27) or exacerbate ileum food anaphylaxis (28). We have reported extensively on focal intra-polyp and intra-tumor mastocytosis during polyposis and cancer in the small bowel and colon (5, 13–15). Therefore, we examined the 5CreCAT mice for intestinal pathologies. Younger mice appeared healthy, however both male and female mice developed rectal prolapse as early as 5 months of age. Necropsy of the mice determined that by 5.5 months of age, 9/10 male and 9/10 female 5CreCAT mice had large colonic polyps (Figures 2A,B), ranging in size between 1.5 and 7.0 mm with a mean diameter of 3.8 mm. Histological examination of FFPE sections of colon jelly rolls revealed pedunculated/tubular adenomatous polyps (Figure 2C). To confirm epithelial transformation, colon sections were stained with antibody to ß-catenin. Nuclear accumulation of ß-catenin was prominent in aberrant epithelial cells (Figures 2D,E). By contrast, small bowel adenomatous polyps were rare, and occurred in 1/10 of the examined mice. These lesions had a sessile/villous appearance typical of the small bowel adenomas in mouse models of hereditary polyposis (Figure 2F), and were otherwise similar to the colon adenomas with typical top-down morphology of aberrant epithelial cells (Figures 2G,H). MCs have also been associated with skin tumors (29). We detected only rare incidences of skin tumor, in 2/20 examined mice. These were squamous epithelial tumors that originated in the epidermis and produced nodules that extended deep into the dermis (Figure 2I). The nodules were infiltrated with mMCP5 granule-stored MCs (Figures 2J,K). This is consistent with earlier reported role of CTMCs in the initiation and progession of skin cancer (30). We conclude that chronic activation of ß-catenin in MCs imparts pathogenic properties to MCs, rendering them capable of initiating colon cancer with high prevalence, and increasing the risk of cancer in the small bowel and skin.
To better define the status of MCs in 5CreCAT mice, we stained histological sections of the colon with antibodies to MC-specific proteases. In the healthy gut, storage granule content of mMCP2 and intraepithelial localization identifies MMCs while mMCP5 and mMCP6 together with stromal localization identifies CTMCs (2–4). While we cannot rule out that tumor infiltrating MCs may be different from MCs that infiltrate the healthy gut, it was intriguing to detect in 5CreCAT colon adenomas, MCs with both MMC and CTMC characteristics. It was also of significance that MC densities in these lesions were at least 10 times higher than in the healthy adjacent, or marginal tissue (Figure 3A compare to Figure 3B). mMCP5 was strongly expressed in stromal MCs, while mMCP2 and mMCP6 were expressed by both intraepithelial and stromal MCs (Figure 3C), as has been described for the healthy gut responding to nematode infection. In earlier studies, we established that adenomatous polyps in mouse models of polyposis are from onset infiltrated by mMCP2+ intraepithelial MMCs while transition of adenomas to carcinomas is marked by accumulation of stromal mMCP6+ and submucosal mMCP5+ CTMCs (13). Therefore, the high densities of mMCP5+ and mMCP6+ MCs in 5CreCAT mice had higher densities of both stromal and intraepithelial mMCP5+ MCs than age matched TS4Cre APClox468 (cAPC) mice that develop polyposis due to loss of function of APC in gut epithelial cells (Supplementary Figure 2). The high densities of mMCP5+ MCs in 5CreCAT polyps was surprising and distinguished these from typical benign polyps that arise spontaneously in mouse models of polyposis.
We had also earlier reported that spontaneous polyposis in genetically susceptible APC deficient mice is marked by mixed TH2 and TH17 inflammation, and that MCs and GATA3 positive cells tend to accumulate together inside polyps (13). To further investigate TH2 inflammation in 5CreCAT polyps we performed IF staining on FFPE sections for the Gata3+CD3− innate lymphoid type-2 cells (ILC2s), Gata3+CD3+ T-helper cells type-2 cells (TH2) and, CD3+ GATA3− T-cells. We detected preferential intra-polyp accumulation of all three cell types, over and above the densities of the same cells in distant healthy tissues (Figures 4A,C,D). Thus, the 5CreCAT adenomas had a strong TH2 microenvironment supportive of MC expansion. Interestingly, nearly half of the polyp infiltrating mMCP2+ MCs were located within one cell distance of GATA3+ cells (Figures 4B,E). This finding raises the intriguing possibility of close interactions of MCs and ILCs within the polyps. This finding raises the intriguing possibility of close interactions of MCs and ILCs within the polyps.
With age, both male and female 5CreCAT mice developed splenomegaly (Figure 5A). Spleens of 5CreCAT mice contained high densities of megakaryocytes as compared to control 5Cre mice (Figures 5B–D). Megakaryocytes are now recognized as immune cells capable of inducing inflammation (31). The 5CreCAT spleens also contained increased densities of pro-inflammatory Ly6ChiCX3CR1lo monocytes, but decreased resident anti-inflammatory Ly6CloCX3CR1hi monocytes (32) (Figures 5E,F), and high densities CD11b+Ly6C+Ly6G+ myeloid-derived suppressor cells (Figure 5G). Regulatory T-cells respond to inflammation. We had reported earlier that during polyposis mast cell render Tregs pro-inflammatory and capable of secreting IL-17 (33). Accordingly, total densities of Tregs and the fraction of Tregs that co-expressed Foxp3 and RORγt were elevated in the MLN of 5CreCAT mice (Figures 5H,I).
To test the direct effect of 5CreCAT MCs on colon cancer, we introduced 5CreCAT or control 5Cre bone marrow into lethally-irradiated WT mice and polyposis-prone APCΔ468 mice 8 weeks after birth. We then aged the mice to 5.5 months of age. Mice that were reconstituted with 5CreCAT bone marrow had markedly elongated colon crypts as compared to mice that received 5Cre bone marrow (Figure 6A), demonstrating enhanced colonocyte renewal. APCΔ468 mice normally develop severe small bowel polyposis, but few if any colonic polyps. Accordingly, by 5.5 months of age, only 2/7 control 5Cre-chimeric APCΔ468 mice developed one colonic polyp each (Figure 6B). By contrast 4/7 5CreCAT-chimeric APCΔ468 mice developed 3–4 colonic polyps (Figure 6B). Histologic analysis revealed aggressive adenomas in 5CreCAT chimeric relative to 5Cre mice, with extensive nuclear ß-catenin staining throughout the lesions that extended to the submucosal border (Figures 6D–O). In earlier studies we had related expansion of CTMC to adenoma to carcinoma transition in mice (13). Accordingly, we noted expansion of stromal mMCP5 stained MCs in the 5CreCAT relative to 5Cre chimeric APCΔ468 mice (Figures 6C,P–R). These findings are consistent with tumorigenic properties of 5CreCAT bone marrow derived MCs.
Discussion
We demonstrated that MCs tolerate over expression of ß-catenin which however predisposes mice to develop colonic polyps in an age dependent manner, independently of gender. Accumulation of both MMC and CTMC type MCs in the polyps distinguished these from benign adenomas that develop in mouse models of spontaneous polyposis, which are primarily infiltrated by mMCP2+ MMCs but not mMCP5+ CTMCs (5, 13). The frequent incidence of colonic polyps, but only rare small polyps, indicates a association between stabilization ß-catenin in MCs and increased risk of colon cancer. We provided further evidence in support of the tumorigenic properties of ß-catenin overexpressing MCs by generating bone marrow chimeric mice. APCΔ468 mice that received 5CreCAT bone marrow developed more aggressive colon polyposis. In both models, MC expansion was largely confined to tumors and was markedly less in the distant healthy tissue, suggesting a positive feedback loop between the tumor and MCs. Altogether, these observations strongly suggest that Mcpt5-Cre mediated stabilization of ß-catenin in 5CreCAT mice increases the risk of colon cancer by activating MCs.
A number of observations distinguish the 5CreCAT mice from classical mouse models of polyposis. Mouse models of hereditary polyposis including the APCΔ468 mice mainly develop small bowel polyps, and only rarely have polyps in the colon. In earlier studies we made the surprising observation that polyposis in the small bowel and colon has differential requirements for cytokines and MC. In small polyposis MMCs expanded in an IL10 dependent manner and both IL10 and MMCs were essential for polyp growth (5, 13, 15). By contrast, colon polyps were not affected by IL10 deficiency and progressed in IL10 deficient mice with extensive infiltration of the polyps with CTMCs (14, 15). The and intrapolyp expansion of mMCP5+ CTMCs in 5CreCAT mice is in agreement with these earlier observations, and with the notion that mMCP5+ CTMCs may have a causative role in colon carcinogenesis.
Colonic polyposis in 5CreCAT mice coincided with systemic inflammation, which we readily detected in the spleens of affected mice. The inflammation was characterized by splenomegaly, notable expansion of megakaryocytes, increase in frequencies inflammatory monocytes and myeloid derived suppressor cells, and expansion of Tregs. We had reported earlier that Treg suppressive properties are compromised in polyposis and colon cancer, as they gain TH17 like characteristics and become pro-inflammatory (25, 34–36). This change in properties coincided with upregulation of both the co-expression of Foxp3 and the canonical TH17 transcription factor RORγt (33, 34). Similar changes in Treg characteristics were introduced by ex vivo co-culture of Tregs with MCs (33). Accordingly, in the current study we detected increased densities of CD4+Foxp3+ and CD4+Foxp3+RORγt+ Tregs in the mesenteric lymph nodes (MLNs) of 5CreCAT mice. These findings indicate that expansion of MCs in the colon promotes systemic inflammation, and this could be in part by altering Treg properties.
Our finding that constitutive ß-catenin activity expands MCs is consistent with earlier ex vivo studies that documented Wnt5A-stimulation of MC maturation (18), a report suggesting that ß-catenin is activated downstream of c-Kit (16), and observations suggesting that ß-catenin signaling in MCs is inhibited through pharmacologic blockade of c-Kit phosphorylation (37). These reports together with our findings encourage more work in understanding the cross talk between c-Kit and ß-catenin signaling in MCs in colon cancer.
Activation of MCs by ß-catenin coincided with the expansion of Gata3+ type-2 lymphocytes. MCs are essential for induction of ILC2 responses to helminth infection (38). MC-ILC cooperation has been documented in animal models of skin scratch and food allergy ileitis (28), and expansion of MCs in the duodenum was reported to be ILC-dependent (28). While a TH2 environment in colonic polyps is consistent with MC expansion, the nature of communication between MCs and Gata3+ lymphocytes, which include T-cells and ILC2s is poorly understood. Activation of ß-catenin in MCs may define the nature and outcomes of such interactions. Further research is needed to establish whether the close apposition of Gata3+ cells and MCs in 5CreCAT polyps indicates paracrine crosstalk and/or direct contact between the cell types.
Tissue resident CTMCs are abundant in the skin, which expand in response to various stimuli including scratching (28), and have also been associated with skin tumors (29). While we expected skin tumors in 5CreCAT mice the relatively low incidence of skin tumors was a surprise. One possibility is that skin-residing CTMCs which are typically innate and of embryonic origin are distinct from the bone marrow derived ß-catenin activated-MCs that also happen to have a CTMC like phenotype.
The transfer of bone marrow from 5rCreCAT mice to APCΔ468 mice was sufficient to increase colonic polyposis and enhance their aggressive characteristics marked by extensive nuclear ß-catenin staining of the lesions. The transfer of 5CreCAT bone marrow to the APCΔ468 mice resulted in focal expansion of CTMCs in the tumor stroma, as compared to 5Cre bone marrow chimeric mice. These findings support the bone marrow origin of tumor promoting MCs in the 5CreCAT chimeric mice. Our efficiency of bone marrow reconstitution (assessed by reconstituting CD45.1 mice with CD45.2 bone marrow and analyzing MNCs from mesenteric lymph nodes) is typically over 85%. Tissue resident gut MC could be radio resistant. However, we have previously shown that with polyp growth, additional bone marrow derived MCp are actively recruited to the gut. By transferring CD34 CD43 deficient bone marrow to lethally irradiated APCΔ468 mice we were able to efficiently block MCp homing of bone marrow derived MCp to the gut, and attenuated polyposis (5). We are therefore confident that bone marrow derived mast cells contribute to polyposis. In the current study, bone marrow transfer from 5CreCAT mice to APCΔ468 mice increased colonic polyposis and the density of mMCP5+ mast cells in the polyp stroma. These findings indicate that expression of a dominant active ß-catenin conveys colon cancer promoting properties to bone marrow derived mast cells.
Overall, these observations provide new insights into the role Wnt/ß-catenin signaling in the gain of pro-inflammatory and colon cancer promoting properties by MCs. Our findings expand and solidify the role of mast cells in tumor immunology. Nevertheless, we are aware that in spite of similarities in expression of mMCP5, submucosal distribution, and association with tumor invasion, our observations do not prove that 5CreCAT MCs are identical to mMCP5+ CTMCs in healthy mice or in tumors. This question remains to be addressed in future studies by further molecular and functional comparisons of the MCs.
Data Availability Statement
All datasets generated for this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material.
Ethics Statement
The animal study was reviewed and approved by Mayo Clinic.
Author Contributions
AS, ML, FT, AO, and MS participated in the design and execution of experiments, collected and analyzed data, helped in preparation of figures, and text of manuscript. DL, KD, SMMH, and FG provided material and critical advice, participated in the interpretation of findings and edited draft of manuscript. KK conceived the project, designed experiments, analyzed and interpreted data, wrote the manuscript. MG generously provided material and crucial advice without which this work would have not been possible.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
Ms. Nicoleta Carapanceanu and Mr. Vali Carapanceanu are thankfully acknowledged for outstanding technical assistance.
Glossary
Abbreviations
- 5Cre
Mcpt5-Cre mice
- 5CreCAT
Mcpt5-Cre Catnblox(ex3) compound mutant mice
- MC
mature mast cells
- eMCP
early mature mast cells
- MCp
mast cell progenitors
- rcf
relative centrifugal force
- RBC
red blood cells
- FFPE
formalin fixed paraffin embedded
- MNC
mononuclear cells
- CTMC
connective tissue mast cells
- MMC
mucosal mast cells
- IF
immunofluorescence:
- PCR
polymerase chain reaction
- ILC
innate lymphoid cells
- TH2
T-helper cells type 2
- MLNs
mesenteric lymph nodes
- APC
adenomatous polyposis coli.
Footnotes
Funding. This work was supported by R01CA160436 and R01 AI 108682 (KK and FG) and a Canadian Cancer Society (CCS) Innovation Grant (grant # 706396) to SMMH.
Supplementary Material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2019.02777/full#supplementary-material
References
- 1.Austen KF, Gurish MF. Resolution of a human mast cell development conundrum. Blood. (2017) 130:1777–8. 10.1182/blood-2017-09-802173 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Friend DS, Ghildyal N, Austen KF, Gurish MF, Matsumoto R, Stevens RL. Mast cells that reside at different locations in the jejunum of mice infected with Trichinella spiralis exhibit sequential changes in their granule ultrastructure and chymase phenotype. J Cell Biol. (1996) 135:279–90. 10.1083/jcb.135.1.279 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Friend DS, Ghildyal N, Gurish MF, Hunt J, Hu X, Austen KF, et al. Reversible expression of tryptases and chymases in the jejunal mast cells of mice infected with Trichinella spiralis. J Immunol. (1998) 160:5537–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gurish MF, Austen KF. Developmental origin and functional specialization of mast cell subsets. Immunity. (2012) 37:25–33. 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.07.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gounaris E, Erdman SE, Restaino C, Gurish MF, Friend DS, Gounari F, et al. Mast cells are an essential hematopoietic component for polyp development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2007) 104:19977–82. 10.1073/pnas.0704620104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Khazaie K, Blatner NR, Khan MW, Gounari F, Gounaris E, Dennis K, et al. The significant role of mast cells in cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev. (2011) 30:45–60. 10.1007/s10555-011-9286-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Varricchi G, Galdiero MR, Loffredo S, Marone G, Iannone R, Marone G, et al. Are mast cells MASTers in cancer? Front Immunol. (2017) 8:424. 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00424 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Rigoni A, Bongiovanni L, Burocchi A, Sangaletti S, Danelli L, Guarnotta C, et al. Mast cells infiltrating inflamed or transformed gut alternatively sustain mucosal healing or tumor growth. Cancer Res. (2015) 75:3760–70. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-3767 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rigoni A, Colombo MP, Pucillo C. The role of mast cells in molding the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Microenviron. (2015) 8:167–76. 10.1007/s12307-014-0152-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Frossi B, Mion F, Tripodo C, Colombo MP, Pucillo CE. Rheostatic functions of mast cells in the control of innate and adaptive immune responses. Trends Immunol. (2017) 38:648–56. 10.1016/j.it.2017.04.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bodduluri SR, Mathis S, Maturu P, Krishnan E, Satpathy SR, Chilton PM, et al. Mast cell-dependent CD8(+) T-cell recruitment mediates immune surveillance of intestinal tumors in Apc(Min/+) mice. Cancer Immunol Res. (2018) 6:332–47. 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-17-0424 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Abdul-Wahid A, Cydzik M, Prodeus A, Alwash M, Stanojcic M, Thompson M, et al. Induction of antigen-specific TH 9 immunity accompanied by mast cell activation blocks tumor cell engraftment. Int J Cancer. (2016) 139:841–53. 10.1002/ijc.30121 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Saadalla AM, Osman A, Gurish MF, Dennis KL, Blatner NR, Pezeshki A, et al. Mast cells promote small bowel cancer in a tumor stage-specific and cytokine-dependent manner. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2018) 115:1588–92. 10.1073/pnas.1716804115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Dennis KL, Wang Y, Blatner NR, Wang S, Saadalla A, Trudeau E, et al. Adenomatous polyps are driven by microbe-instigated focal inflammation and are controlled by IL-10-producing T cells. Cancer Res. (2013) 73:5905–13. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-1511 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dennis KL, Saadalla A, Blatner NR, Wang S, Venkateswaran V, Gounari F, et al. T-cell expression of IL10 is essential for tumor immune surveillance in the small intestine. Cancer Immunol Res. (2015) 3:806–14. 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-14-0169 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kajiguchi T, Lee S, Lee MJ, Trepel JB, Neckers L. KIT regulates tyrosine phosphorylation and nuclear localization of beta-catenin in mast cell leukemia. Leuk Res. (2008) 32:761–70. 10.1016/j.leukres.2007.08.023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tickenbrock L, Hehn S, Sargin B, Evers G, Ng PR, Choudhary C, et al. Activation of Wnt signaling in cKit-ITD mediated transformation and imatinib sensitivity in acute myeloid leukemia. Int J Hematol. (2008) 88:174–80. 10.1007/s12185-008-0141-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yamaguchi T, Nishijima M, Tashiro K, Kawabata K. Wnt-β-catenin signaling promotes the maturation of mast cells. Biomed Res Int. (2016) 2016:2048987. 10.1155/2016/2048987 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Voloshanenko O, Erdmann G, Dubash TD, Augustin I, Metzig M, Moffa G, et al. Wnt secretion is required to maintain high levels of Wnt activity in colon cancer cells. Nat Commun. (2013) 4:2610. 10.1038/ncomms3610 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Harada N, Tamai Y, Ishikawa T, Sauer B, Takaku K, Oshima M, et al. Intestinal polyposis in mice with a dominant stable mutation of the beta-catenin gene. EMBO J. (1999) 18:5931–42. 10.1093/emboj/18.21.5931 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Scholten J, Hartmann K, Gerbaulet A, Krieg T, Muller W, Testa G, et al. Mast cell-specific Cre/loxP-mediated recombination in vivo. Transgenic Res. (2008) 17:307–15. 10.1007/s11248-007-9153-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mackley EC, Houston S, Marriott CL, Halford EE, Lucas B, Cerovic V, et al. CCR7-dependent trafficking of RORgamma(+) ILCs creates a unique microenvironment within mucosal draining lymph nodes. Nat Commun. (2015) 6:5862. 10.1038/ncomms6862 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Dudeck A, Dudeck J, Scholten J, Petzold A, Surianarayanan S, Kohler A, et al. Mast cells are key promoters of contact allergy that mediate the adjuvant effects of haptens. Immunity. (2011) 34:973–84. 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.03.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Dose M, Emmanuel AO, Chaumeil J, Zhang J, Sun T, Germar K, et al. β-catenin induces T-cell transformation by promoting genomic instability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2014) 111:391–6. 10.1073/pnas.1315752111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Keerthivasan S, Aghajani K, Dose M, Molinero L, Khan MW, Venkateswaran V, et al. β-catenin promotes colitis and colon cancer through imprinting of proinflammatory properties in T cells. Sci Transl Med. (2014) 6:225ra228. 10.1126/scitranslmed.3007607 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bankova LG, Dwyer DF, Liu AY, Austen KF, Gurish MF. Maturation of mast cell progenitors to mucosal mast cells during allergic pulmonary inflammation in mice. Mucosal Immunol. (2015) 8:596–606. 10.1038/mi.2014.91 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Gerbaulet A, Wickenhauser C, Scholten J, Peschke K, Drube S, Horny HP, et al. Mast cell hyperplasia, B-cell malignancy, and intestinal inflammation in mice with conditional expression of a constitutively active kit. Blood. (2011) 117:2012–21. 10.1182/blood-2008-11-189605 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Leyva-Castillo JM, Galand C, Kam C, Burton O, Gurish M, Musser MA, et al. Mechanical skin injury promotes food anaphylaxis by driving intestinal mast cell expansion. Immunity. (2019) 50:1262–75 e1264. 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.03.023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ch'ng S, Wallis RA, Yuan L, Davis PF, Tan ST. Mast cells and cutaneous malignancies. Mod Pathol. (2006) 19:149–59. 10.1038/modpathol.3800474 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Varricchi G, Galdiero MR, Marone G, Granata F, Borriello F, Marone G. Controversial role of mast cells in skin cancers. Exp Dermatol. (2017) 26:11–7. 10.1111/exd.13107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Cunin P, Nigrovic PA. Megakaryocytes as immune cells. J Leukoc Biol. (2019) 105:1111–21. 10.1002/JLB.MR0718-261RR [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Mitchell AJ, Roediger B, Weninger W. Monocyte homeostasis and the plasticity of inflammatory monocytes. Cell Immunol. (2014) 291:22–31. 10.1016/j.cellimm.2014.05.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Blatner NR, Bonertz A, Beckhove P, Cheon EC, Krantz SB, Strouch M, et al. In colorectal cancer mast cells contribute to systemic regulatory T-cell dysfunction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2010) 107:6430–5. 10.1073/pnas.0913683107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Gounaris E, Blatner NR, Dennis K, Magnusson F, Gurish MF, Strom TB, et al. T-regulatory cells shift from a protective anti-inflammatory to a cancer-promoting proinflammatory phenotype in polyposis. Cancer Res. (2009) 69:5490–7. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-0304 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Blatner NR, Mulcahy MF, Dennis KL, Scholtens D, Bentrem DJ, Phillips JD, et al. Expression of RORgammat marks a pathogenic regulatory T cell subset in human colon cancer. Sci Transl Med. (2012) 4:164ra159. 10.1126/scitranslmed.3004566 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Bos PD, Rudensky AY. Treg cells in cancer: a case of multiple personality disorder. Sci Transl Med. (2012) 4:164fs144. 10.1126/scitranslmed.3005283 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Jin B, Ding K, Pan J. Ponatinib induces apoptosis in imatinib-resistant human mast cells by dephosphorylating mutant D816V KIT and silencing β-catenin signaling. Mol Cancer Ther. (2014) 13:1217–30. 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0397 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Shimokawa C, Kanaya T, Hachisuka M, Ishiwata K, Hisaeda H, Kurashima Y, et al. Mast cells are crucial for induction of group 2 innate lymphoid cells and clearance of helminth infections. Immunity. (2017) 46:863–74 e864. 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.04.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All datasets generated for this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material.