In the Special Communication entitled “Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies: The PRISMA-DTA Statement”1 published in the January 23/30, 2018, issue of JAMA, incorrect terminology appeared in Table 2. In Table 2, in the ninth row up from the bottom of the table, “Results of individual studiesb,” “receiver operating characteristic curve” should have been “receiver operating characteristic plot.” This article was corrected online.
Reference
- 1.McInnes MDF, Moher D, Thombs BD, et al. ; the PRISMA-DTA Group . Preferred reporting items for a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies: the PRISMA-DTA statement. JAMA. 2018;319(4):388-396. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.19163 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
